Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1134/S1560354725540044
Corrado Falcolini, Davide Zaccaria
We provide a new expansion of the Fourier coefficient of the perturbing function of the PCR3Body problem in terms of Hansen coefficients. This gives us a precise asymptotic formula for the coefficient in the region of application of KAM theory (i. e., small value of eccentricity and semimajor axis. See, e. g., [17]). Moreover, in the above region, we study the presence of zeros of the Fourier coefficient for coprime modes ((m,k)inmathbb{Z}^{2}) and the presence of common zeros as functions of actions between coefficients relative to modes ((m,k)),((2m,2k)) and ((m,k)),((2m,2k)),((3m,3k)). Thanks to the previous expansion, this numerical analysis is done up to order (60) in the power of eccentricity and semimajor axis. This is the first step for a possible application of [4, 9] to the PCR3Body Problem that would imply a reduction in terms of measure in the phase space of the so-called “non-torus” set from (O(1-sqrt{varepsilon})) (implied by standard KAM theory) to (O(1-varepsilon|logvarepsilon|^{c})) for some (c>0).
{"title":"On the Analytic Properties of the Perturbing Function in the PCR3Body Problem","authors":"Corrado Falcolini, Davide Zaccaria","doi":"10.1134/S1560354725540044","DOIUrl":"10.1134/S1560354725540044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We provide a new expansion of the Fourier coefficient of the perturbing function of the\u0000PCR3Body problem in terms of Hansen coefficients. This gives us a precise asymptotic formula\u0000for the coefficient in the region of application of KAM theory (i. e., small value of eccentricity and semimajor\u0000axis. See, e. g., [17]). Moreover, in the above region, we study the presence of zeros of the Fourier coefficient for coprime modes <span>((m,k)inmathbb{Z}^{2})</span> and the presence of common zeros as functions of actions between coefficients relative to modes <span>((m,k))</span>,<span>((2m,2k))</span> and <span>((m,k))</span>,<span>((2m,2k))</span>,<span>((3m,3k))</span>.\u0000Thanks to the previous expansion, this numerical analysis is done up to order <span>(60)</span> in the power\u0000of eccentricity and semimajor axis. This is the\u0000first step for a possible application of [4, 9] to the PCR3Body Problem that would imply a reduction in terms of measure in the phase space of the so-called “non-torus” set from <span>(O(1-sqrt{varepsilon}))</span> (implied by standard KAM theory) to <span>(O(1-varepsilon|logvarepsilon|^{c}))</span> for some <span>(c>0)</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":752,"journal":{"name":"Regular and Chaotic Dynamics","volume":"31 Editors:","pages":"92 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147340626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1134/S1560354725540056
Jair Koiller
Rubber rolling (meaning no-slip and no-twist constraints) of a convex body on the plane under the influence of gravity is a (SE(2)) Chaplygin system that reduces to the cotangent bundle of the unit sphere of Poisson vectors. I comment here upon an observation by A. V. Borisov and I. S. Mamaev [1, 2008], also found in A. V. Borisov, I. S. Mamaev and I. A. Bizyaev [2, 2013] that surfaces of revolution are special: the additional integral of motion is elementary, while for marble rolling it requires special functions. I use the term “Nose function” to refer to their expression (N(theta)=big{(}I_{1}cos^{2}theta+I_{3}sin^{2}theta+mz_{C}^{2}(theta)big{)}^{1/2}) where (theta) is the nutation and (z_{C}(theta)) is the center of mass height. (N(theta)) appears somewhat miraculously in the process of the almost symplectic reduction. I work in a space frame using the Euler angles (phi text{(yaw)}, psi text{ roll and } theta). The reduction to 1 DoF is done in two stages: first, reduction by the group (SE(2)={(x,y,phi)}) to (T^{*}S^{2}) with almost symplectic 2-form (Omega_{NH}=dp_{theta}wedge dtheta+dp_{psi}wedge dpsi+Jcdot K). The semibasic term is (Jcdot K=-p_{psi}(dlogbig{(}N(theta)big{)}wedge dpsi). It follows that (Omega_{NH}) is conformally symplectic in the sense that (dleft(frac{1}{N}Omega_{NH}right)=0.)