Estifanos, F., Getu, E., Beyene, D., Habtegebriel, M. H., & Fenta, B. A.(2025). Grain yield stability by different statistical models in small seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes at diverse agroecologies of Ethiopia. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8, e70253. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70253
There was a grammatical error in the title of the article—“acroecologies” was mistakenly used instead of “agroecologies.” This has now been corrected in both the title and in the How to Cite section. The correct title is “Grain yield stability by different statistical models in small seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes at diverse agroecologies of Ethiopia.”
We apologize for this error.
Estifanos, F., Getu, E., Beyene, D., Habtegebriel, m.h., & Fenta, b.a.(2025)。埃塞俄比亚不同农业生态条件下小粒豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)基因型籽粒产量稳定性的不同统计模型地球科学与环境学报,2016,33(2):444 - 444。https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70253There是文章标题中的一个语法错误——用“acroecologies”代替“agroecologies”是错误的。这已经在标题和如何引用部分得到了纠正。正确的标题是“埃塞俄比亚不同农业生态条件下小粒普通豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)基因型不同统计模型的粮食产量稳定性”。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Grain yield stability by different statistical models in small seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes at diverse agroecologies of Ethiopia”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70282","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estifanos, F., Getu, E., Beyene, D., Habtegebriel, M. H., & Fenta, B. A.(2025). Grain yield stability by different statistical models in small seeded common bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.) genotypes at diverse agroecologies of Ethiopia. <i>Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment</i>, <i>8</i>, e70253. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70253</p><p>There was a grammatical error in the title of the article—“acroecologies” was mistakenly used instead of “agroecologies.” This has now been corrected in both the title and in the How to Cite section. The correct title is “Grain yield stability by different statistical models in small seeded common bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.) genotypes at diverse agroecologies of Ethiopia.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70282","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145887835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samuel Adissie Gedamu, Kassa Sisay, Habtemariam Teshome, Tigabu Fenta
Knowing the most yield-limiting soil nutrient is crucial for closing the yield gap in all crop production systems. The proper supply of balanced nutrients is essential for maximizing the production of onions and tomatoes. The study was conducted to determine the response of onion and tomato to the omission of different nutrients in their growth and yield under open-field conditions at Raya Kobo District during the 2020/21 growing season, under irrigation. The experiment was laid out in the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. A soil sample was taken using an auger before planting for the analysis of the physicochemical properties of the soil. Analysis of variance was computed using R software. The analysis result showed that statistically, the lowest marketable yield of onion was recorded from the omission of nitrogen and the control treatment. In contrast, the highest total unmarketable yield of onion was recorded from the control treatments. Similarly, the combined analysis result for tomato showed that the highest marketable yield was recorded from boron-omitted plots, which significantly differs from N omitted and control treatments but not significantly from others. In contrast, the lowest total marketable yield was recorded from the control and N-omitted treatments. There was also a substantial and positive correlation between marketable yield and the number of clusters per plant and the number of fruit per cluster (p < 0.01). The analysis of variance indicates that N was the most yield-limiting nutrient for both onion and tomato production, more than any other nutrient. This study was conducted to determine which nutrient was yield-limiting and did not address what amount was needed. Therefore, optimum fertilizer rate determination on the yield-limiting nutrient should be conducted.
{"title":"Multi-nutrient omission trials for yield optimization: Diagnosing yield-limiting nutrients for onion (Allium cepa L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under irrigation conditions in Raya Kobo District, Eastern Ethiopia","authors":"Samuel Adissie Gedamu, Kassa Sisay, Habtemariam Teshome, Tigabu Fenta","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowing the most yield-limiting soil nutrient is crucial for closing the yield gap in all crop production systems. The proper supply of balanced nutrients is essential for maximizing the production of onions and tomatoes. The study was conducted to determine the response of onion and tomato to the omission of different nutrients in their growth and yield under open-field conditions at Raya Kobo District during the 2020/21 growing season, under irrigation. The experiment was laid out in the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. A soil sample was taken using an auger before planting for the analysis of the physicochemical properties of the soil. Analysis of variance was computed using R software. The analysis result showed that statistically, the lowest marketable yield of onion was recorded from the omission of nitrogen and the control treatment. In contrast, the highest total unmarketable yield of onion was recorded from the control treatments. Similarly, the combined analysis result for tomato showed that the highest marketable yield was recorded from boron-omitted plots, which significantly differs from N omitted and control treatments but not significantly from others. In contrast, the lowest total marketable yield was recorded from the control and N-omitted treatments. There was also a substantial and positive correlation between marketable yield and the number of clusters per plant and the number of fruit per cluster (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The analysis of variance indicates that N was the most yield-limiting nutrient for both onion and tomato production, more than any other nutrient. This study was conducted to determine which nutrient was yield-limiting and did not address what amount was needed. Therefore, optimum fertilizer rate determination on the yield-limiting nutrient should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145887290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Connor N. Sible, Jared S. Fender, Frederick E. Below
The use of carbon-based biostimulants (e.g., humic acid [HA] and molasses/yeast extract [MYE]) to enhance grain yield and/or quality of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is increasing. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine if MYE or HA use can consistently influence grain yield and quality of maize and soybean across site-years and (2) ascertain if these applications are profitable. Treatments consisted of an untreated control and two commercially available products, one MYE and one HA, applied as either a broadcast soil application or to the seed furrow at planting of maize and soybean in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Maize yield was higher with in-furrow applications compared to preplant broadcast applications, culminating in a 3-year average yield increase of 310 (HA) or 370 (MYE) kg ha−1 and respective return on investment of $29 or $63 ha−1. Maize grain protein concentration increased with both the broadcast HA (+1.7 g kg−1) and in-furrow MYE (+1.8 g kg−1) applications, netting an increase in protein production of 40 and 50 kg ha−1, respectively. Conversely, there were no consistent effects of HA or MYE applications on soybean grain yield or quality, netting an average loss of $51 ha−1. These data suggest that soil-applied MYE or HA can increase grain yield, protein production, and profitability of maize but did not have a measurable agronomic or economic value when applied to soybean grown under the non-stressed field conditions observed here.
使用碳基生物刺激剂(如腐植酸[HA]和糖蜜/酵母提取物[MYE])来提高玉米(Zea mays L.)和大豆(Glycine max (L.))的粮食产量和/或质量。稳定。正在增加。本研究的目的是:(1)确定MYE或HA的使用是否可以持续地影响玉米和大豆的产量和质量。(2)确定这些应用是否有利可图。处理包括未经处理的对照和两种市售产品,一种是MYE,一种是HA,分别在2020年、2021年和2022年播种玉米和大豆时撒播土壤或施用于种沟。与播前施用相比,垄作玉米产量更高,3年平均产量增加310(公顷)或370 (MYE)公斤公顷- 1,投资回报率分别为29美元或63美元公顷- 1。撒播透明质酸(+1.7 g kg - 1)和垄作透明质酸(+1.8 g kg - 1)均可提高玉米籽粒蛋白质浓度,蛋白质产量分别增加40和50 kg HA - 1。相反,施用HA或MYE对大豆籽粒产量或质量没有一致的影响,平均净损失为51公顷- 1。这些数据表明,土壤施用MYE或HA可以提高玉米的粮食产量、蛋白质产量和盈利能力,但在无胁迫条件下施用大豆时,没有可测量的农艺或经济价值。
{"title":"Soil-applied carbon-based biostimulants differentially affect maize and soybean grain yield and quality","authors":"Connor N. Sible, Jared S. Fender, Frederick E. Below","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70281","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of carbon-based biostimulants (e.g., humic acid [HA] and molasses/yeast extract [MYE]) to enhance grain yield and/or quality of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] is increasing. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine if MYE or HA use can consistently influence grain yield and quality of maize and soybean across site-years and (2) ascertain if these applications are profitable. Treatments consisted of an untreated control and two commercially available products, one MYE and one HA, applied as either a broadcast soil application or to the seed furrow at planting of maize and soybean in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Maize yield was higher with in-furrow applications compared to preplant broadcast applications, culminating in a 3-year average yield increase of 310 (HA) or 370 (MYE) kg ha<sup>−1</sup> and respective return on investment of $29 or $63 ha<sup>−1</sup>. Maize grain protein concentration increased with both the broadcast HA (+1.7 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) and in-furrow MYE (+1.8 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) applications, netting an increase in protein production of 40 and 50 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Conversely, there were no consistent effects of HA or MYE applications on soybean grain yield or quality, netting an average loss of $51 ha<sup>−1</sup>. These data suggest that soil-applied MYE or HA can increase grain yield, protein production, and profitability of maize but did not have a measurable agronomic or economic value when applied to soybean grown under the non-stressed field conditions observed here.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70281","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Albrecht, K. A.,Contreras-Govea, F. E., Munaiz, E. D., Bures, E. J., & Arriaga, F. J. (2025). Performance of drought-tolerant maize for silage or grain in conventional and Kura clover perennial groundcover cropping systems. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8, e70255.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70255
The affiliation for co-author Eduardo D. Munaiz was incomplete. The original affiliation is listed as “UniLaSalle, College of Agrosciences, Beauvais, France.” It has now been updated to “UniLaSalle, College of Agrosciences, AGHYLE UP 2018.C101, Beauvais, France.”
We apologize for this error.
Albrecht, K. A.,Contreras-Govea, F. E., Munaiz, E. D., Bures, E. J., & & Arriaga, F. J.(2025)。耐旱玉米在传统和库拉三叶草多年生地被作物系统中的青贮或谷物性能。农业系统,地球科学与环境,8,e70255.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70255The与作者Eduardo D. Munaiz的联系不完整。最初的隶属关系是“UniLaSalle,农业科学学院,博韦,法国。”现在已更新为“UniLaSalle, College of Agrosciences, AGHYLE UP 2018”。C101,博韦,法国。”我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Performance of drought-tolerant maize for silage or grain in conventional and Kura clover perennial groundcover cropping systems”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70270","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Albrecht, K. A.,Contreras-Govea, F. E., Munaiz, E. D., Bures, E. J., & Arriaga, F. J. (2025). Performance of drought-tolerant maize for silage or grain in conventional and Kura clover perennial groundcover cropping systems. <i>Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8</i>, e70255.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70255</p><p>The affiliation for co-author Eduardo D. Munaiz was incomplete. The original affiliation is listed as “UniLaSalle, College of Agrosciences, Beauvais, France.” It has now been updated to “UniLaSalle, College of Agrosciences, AGHYLE UP 2018.C101, Beauvais, France.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70270","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rehnuma Maisha, Dean D. Steele, Aaron L. M. Daigh, Xinhua Jia, Thomas DeSutter, Christopher M. U. Neale
With the increasing availability of soil water sensing technologies for irrigation management, it is essential to compare sensor options in production field settings. In this study, four soil water sensors—CropX, FieldNet with Watermark sensors, Valley Aqua Trac Lite using Sentek probe, and Aqua Trac Pro with Watermark sensors—were compared with Acclima TDR-310H (where TDR is time domain reflectometry) at four depths during the 2021–2023 growing seasons in three production fields in southeastern North Dakota. The Acclima sensor was calibrated in the same fields where the sensors were installed and was considered the reference standard for comparison with the other sensors. Soil water characteristic curves were developed to convert soil water potential from Watermark sensors from FieldNet and Valley Aqua Trac Pro systems to volumetric water content for comparison to other sensors. Overall, Aqua Trac Lite and CropX had mixed results at all depths (root mean square error [RMSE] typically above 0.05 cm3 cm−3). Lindsay and Aqua Trac Pro had better (smaller) RMSE across depths at sites 1 and 3 compared to CropX and Aqua Trac Lite. As expected, measured soil water contents varied over time for all sensors (i.e., significant main effect for timestamp [p < 0.05]). However, the sensor type's effect on θv was consistent across all 3 years (i.e., main effect for sensor type [p < 0.05] but there was no interaction with timestamp [p > 0.05]). These results will help farmers and crop consultants understand sensor performance when selecting soil water sensors for irrigation management.
随着用于灌溉管理的土壤水分传感技术的日益普及,比较生产现场设置中的传感器选择是至关重要的。在这项研究中,四种土壤水分传感器——cropx、带水印传感器的FieldNet、使用Sentek探针的Valley Aqua Trac Lite和带水印传感器的Aqua Trac Pro——与Acclima TDR- 310h (TDR是时域反射法)在2021-2023年生长季节在北达科他州东南部的三个生产油田的四个深度进行了比较。Acclima传感器在安装传感器的同一领域进行校准,并被视为与其他传感器进行比较的参考标准。开发了土壤水分特征曲线,将FieldNet和Valley Aqua Trac Pro系统的水印传感器的土壤水势转换为体积含水量,以便与其他传感器进行比较。总的来说,Aqua Trac Lite和CropX在所有深度的结果都是混合的(均方根误差[RMSE]通常大于0.05 cm3 cm - 3)。与CropX和Aqua Trac Lite相比,Lindsay和Aqua Trac Pro在站点1和3的深度上有更好(更小)的RMSE。正如预期的那样,所有传感器测量的土壤含水量随时间变化(即时间戳的显著主效应[p <; 0.05])。然而,传感器类型对θv的影响在所有3年中都是一致的(即传感器类型的主要影响[p <; 0.05],但与时间戳没有交互作用[p >; 0.05])。这些结果将有助于农民和作物顾问在选择用于灌溉管理的土壤水分传感器时了解传感器的性能。
{"title":"Comparative analysis of four soil water sensors for irrigation water management","authors":"Rehnuma Maisha, Dean D. Steele, Aaron L. M. Daigh, Xinhua Jia, Thomas DeSutter, Christopher M. U. Neale","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70268","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the increasing availability of soil water sensing technologies for irrigation management, it is essential to compare sensor options in production field settings. In this study, four soil water sensors—CropX, FieldNet with Watermark sensors, Valley Aqua Trac Lite using Sentek probe, and Aqua Trac Pro with Watermark sensors—were compared with Acclima TDR-310H (where TDR is time domain reflectometry) at four depths during the 2021–2023 growing seasons in three production fields in southeastern North Dakota. The Acclima sensor was calibrated in the same fields where the sensors were installed and was considered the reference standard for comparison with the other sensors. Soil water characteristic curves were developed to convert soil water potential from Watermark sensors from FieldNet and Valley Aqua Trac Pro systems to volumetric water content for comparison to other sensors. Overall, Aqua Trac Lite and CropX had mixed results at all depths (root mean square error [RMSE] typically above 0.05 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>). Lindsay and Aqua Trac Pro had better (smaller) RMSE across depths at sites 1 and 3 compared to CropX and Aqua Trac Lite. As expected, measured soil water contents varied over time for all sensors (i.e., significant main effect for timestamp [<i>p</i> < 0.05]). However, the sensor type's effect on <i>θ<sub>v</sub></i> was consistent across all 3 years (i.e., main effect for sensor type [<i>p</i> < 0.05] but there was no interaction with timestamp [<i>p</i> > 0.05]). These results will help farmers and crop consultants understand sensor performance when selecting soil water sensors for irrigation management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70268","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maintaining soil fertility and enhancing food production on smallholder farms in Ethiopia remain a major challenge due to severe nutrient depletion caused by continuous cropping with minimal external nutrient inputs. In this context, a field study was conducted on Nitisols over two consecutive cropping seasons (2022–2023) across four locations to evaluate the effects of combining bio-slurry with inorganic fertilizer on selected soil chemical properties, wheat yield, and economic feasibility. The experiment consisted of 11 treatments comprising sole and integrated applications of liquid bio-slurry, dry bio-slurry, vermicompost, and nitrogen fertilizer from urea. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that the integrated use of bio-slurry with inorganic fertilizer significantly improved soil chemical properties, wheat yield, yield attributes, and overall economic profitability. The combined treatments increased grain yield by 84%–102% compared to the untreated plot, with the highest yield (3835.2 kg ha−1) achieved with 50% N from urea and 50% N from liquid bio-slurry. Specifically, 75% N from urea combined with 25% N from liquid bio-slurry produced the highest grain yields in Hula and Basoliben, while 100% N from urea supplemented with 25% N from liquid and dry bio-slurries provided the maximum yields in Welmera and Ejere districts, respectively. In conclusion, the integrated application of bio-slurry and inorganic fertilizer enhances soil chemical properties, improves wheat yield and its components, and offers a promising approach for sustainable intensification of smallholder wheat production in Nitisols of the study areas and similar agro-ecologies.
在埃塞俄比亚,维持土壤肥力和提高小农农场的粮食产量仍然是一项重大挑战,原因是外部养分投入最少的连作造成了严重的养分消耗。在此背景下,在四个地点连续两个种植季(2022-2023)对Nitisols进行了实地研究,以评估生物浆与无机肥组合对土壤化学性质、小麦产量和经济可行性的影响。试验包括单独施用和综合施用液体生物浆、干燥生物浆、蚯蚓堆肥和尿素氮肥11个处理。处理采用完全随机区组设计,3个重复。结果表明,生物浆与无机肥配合施用显著改善了土壤化学性质、小麦产量、产量属性和综合经济效益。与未处理相比,组合处理的籽粒产量提高了84%-102%,其中50%尿素施氮和50%生物液施氮的产量最高(3835.2 kg ha - 1)。其中,75%尿素施氮配合25%液态生物浆施氮在Hula和Basoliben地区的产量最高,而100%尿素施氮配合25%液态和干燥生物浆施氮在Welmera和Ejere地区的产量最高。综上所述,生物浆与无机肥的综合施用改善了土壤化学性质,提高了小麦产量及其组成成分,为研究区和类似农业生态系统中小农小麦生产的可持续集约化提供了一条有希望的途径。
{"title":"Effects of bio-slurry and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer rates on wheat yield components, yield, and soil properties","authors":"Ashenafi Nigusse, Girma Chala, Fitih Ademe, Dejene Abera, Kasaye Abera, Kassu Tadess, Zeleke Obsa, Melkamu Hordofa, Matias Dejene, Habtamu Getnet, Temesgen Desalegn, Ribika Mekuria","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maintaining soil fertility and enhancing food production on smallholder farms in Ethiopia remain a major challenge due to severe nutrient depletion caused by continuous cropping with minimal external nutrient inputs. In this context, a field study was conducted on Nitisols over two consecutive cropping seasons (2022–2023) across four locations to evaluate the effects of combining bio-slurry with inorganic fertilizer on selected soil chemical properties, wheat yield, and economic feasibility. The experiment consisted of 11 treatments comprising sole and integrated applications of liquid bio-slurry, dry bio-slurry, vermicompost, and nitrogen fertilizer from urea. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that the integrated use of bio-slurry with inorganic fertilizer significantly improved soil chemical properties, wheat yield, yield attributes, and overall economic profitability. The combined treatments increased grain yield by 84%–102% compared to the untreated plot, with the highest yield (3835.2 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) achieved with 50% N from urea and 50% N from liquid bio-slurry. Specifically, 75% N from urea combined with 25% N from liquid bio-slurry produced the highest grain yields in Hula and Basoliben, while 100% N from urea supplemented with 25% N from liquid and dry bio-slurries provided the maximum yields in Welmera and Ejere districts, respectively. In conclusion, the integrated application of bio-slurry and inorganic fertilizer enhances soil chemical properties, improves wheat yield and its components, and offers a promising approach for sustainable intensification of smallholder wheat production in Nitisols of the study areas and similar agro-ecologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70279","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren Gwaltney, Kristofor R. Brye, Diego Della Lunga, Jonathan B. Brye, Trenton L. Roberts, Samuel B. Fernandes, Michael B. Daniels
Reduced tillage (RT) is a common conservation agriculture practice, generally regarded to be a valuable greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation approach through increasing soil carbon (C) stocks. However, direct GHG measurements from RT compared to conventional tillage (CT) treatments can vary greatly depending on site-specific soil properties and management practices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of RT on soil-to-atmosphere carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes and emissions, global warming potential (GWP), yield, and emissions intensity (EI) throughout the 2024 soybean (Glycine max) growing season in a southeast Arkansas production field. Bulk density was lower (p < 0.05) in the CT (1.29 g cm−3) than in the RT (1.44 g cm−3) treatment at the beginning of the growing season, but the greater bulk density in the RT treatment did not result in a change in yield compared to CT. There was no difference in CO2 fluxes between tillage treatments on any measurement date. Methane fluxes from CT were greater (p < 0.05) than from RT on four out of seven measurement dates. Nitrous oxide fluxes were greater (p < 0.05) from CT than RT and greater from RT than CT on four out of eight measurement dates each. Season-long CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions and EI, as well as GWP, did not differ (p > 0.05) between RT and CT. Results showed that more continuous RT practices are needed to develop a residue layer capable of affecting GHG emissions.
减少耕作(RT)是一种常见的保护性农业做法,通常被认为是通过增加土壤碳(C)储量而有价值的温室气体(GHG)缓解方法。然而,与传统耕作(CT)处理相比,RT的直接温室气体测量值可能因场地特定的土壤特性和管理实践而有很大差异。本研究的目的是评估RT对阿肯色州东南部大豆产区2024年大豆(Glycine max)生长季土壤-大气二氧化碳(CO2)、甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)通量和排放、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、产量和排放强度(EI)的短期影响。生长季开始时,CT处理(1.29 g cm−3)的容重低于RT处理(1.44 g cm−3)(p < 0.05),但RT处理较大的容重并未导致产量与CT相比发生变化。在任何测量日期,不同耕作处理之间的CO2通量没有差异。在7个测量日期中的4个,CT的甲烷通量大于RT (p < 0.05)。在8个测量日期中的4个,CT处理的氧化亚氮通量大于RT处理(p < 0.05), RT处理的氧化亚氮通量大于CT处理的氧化亚氮通量。整个季节CO2、CH4和N2O排放量以及EI和GWP在RT和CT之间没有差异(p > 0.05)。结果表明,需要更多的连续RT实践来开发能够影响温室气体排放的残留物层。
{"title":"Short-term tillage effects on greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential from soybean in southeast Arkansas","authors":"Lauren Gwaltney, Kristofor R. Brye, Diego Della Lunga, Jonathan B. Brye, Trenton L. Roberts, Samuel B. Fernandes, Michael B. Daniels","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70274","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reduced tillage (RT) is a common conservation agriculture practice, generally regarded to be a valuable greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation approach through increasing soil carbon (C) stocks. However, direct GHG measurements from RT compared to conventional tillage (CT) treatments can vary greatly depending on site-specific soil properties and management practices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of RT on soil-to-atmosphere carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) fluxes and emissions, global warming potential (GWP), yield, and emissions intensity (EI) throughout the 2024 soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) growing season in a southeast Arkansas production field. Bulk density was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the CT (1.29 g cm<sup>−3</sup>) than in the RT (1.44 g cm<sup>−3</sup>) treatment at the beginning of the growing season, but the greater bulk density in the RT treatment did not result in a change in yield compared to CT. There was no difference in CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes between tillage treatments on any measurement date. Methane fluxes from CT were greater (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than from RT on four out of seven measurement dates. Nitrous oxide fluxes were greater (<i>p</i> < 0.05) from CT than RT and greater from RT than CT on four out of eight measurement dates each. Season-long CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and EI, as well as GWP, did not differ (<i>p</i> > 0.05) between RT and CT. Results showed that more continuous RT practices are needed to develop a residue layer capable of affecting GHG emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70274","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giuliano Sciusco, Carlo De Luca, Simone Magni, Tommaso Federighi, Marco Fontanelli, Lorenzo Gagliardi, J. Scott McElroy, Alessandro De Luca, Massimo Mocioni, Stefano Macolino, Chiara Toniatti, Alice Slaviero, Cristina Pornaro, Nicolò Barbato, Alberto Minelli, Marco Volterrani
The golf industry is undergoing a technological transformation with the integration of autonomous solutions for turf maintenance. The implementation of autonomous mowers (AMs) offers the potential for maintaining low cutting heights at high frequencies, thereby reducing soil compaction and labor requirements. In this case study conducted at Montecchia Golf Course in Italy, a comparative analysis was performed between AMs set to work with a daily mowing frequency and reel mowers set to work two times per week at 16 mm mowing height focusing on turf quality, color, normalized difference vegetation index, root growth, and soil moisture, temperature, and surface hardness. Economic and environmental evaluations, including cost analysis and local CO2 emissions, were also taken into account to assess the two mowing managements. Results indicate that although the reel mower exhibited superior turf quality in May, July, August, and September and turf color during all the study period (May, June, July, August, and September), AMs maintained acceptable standards while providing significant cost and environmental advantages, notably reduced CO2 emissions. This research supports informed decision-making for turf managers contemplating the adoption of autonomous mowing technology.
{"title":"Autonomous and reel mowers in golf course fairway maintenance: A case study in Italy","authors":"Giuliano Sciusco, Carlo De Luca, Simone Magni, Tommaso Federighi, Marco Fontanelli, Lorenzo Gagliardi, J. Scott McElroy, Alessandro De Luca, Massimo Mocioni, Stefano Macolino, Chiara Toniatti, Alice Slaviero, Cristina Pornaro, Nicolò Barbato, Alberto Minelli, Marco Volterrani","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70271","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The golf industry is undergoing a technological transformation with the integration of autonomous solutions for turf maintenance. The implementation of autonomous mowers (AMs) offers the potential for maintaining low cutting heights at high frequencies, thereby reducing soil compaction and labor requirements. In this case study conducted at Montecchia Golf Course in Italy, a comparative analysis was performed between AMs set to work with a daily mowing frequency and reel mowers set to work two times per week at 16 mm mowing height focusing on turf quality, color, normalized difference vegetation index, root growth, and soil moisture, temperature, and surface hardness. Economic and environmental evaluations, including cost analysis and local CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, were also taken into account to assess the two mowing managements. Results indicate that although the reel mower exhibited superior turf quality in May, July, August, and September and turf color during all the study period (May, June, July, August, and September), AMs maintained acceptable standards while providing significant cost and environmental advantages, notably reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This research supports informed decision-making for turf managers contemplating the adoption of autonomous mowing technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70271","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samuel Okai, Sydney Logwood, Lori Duncan, Daniel Yoder, Debasish Saha, Xinhua Yin, Jones Akuaku, Nutifafa Adotey
The composition and breakdown paths of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) and urea are different, but there is limited information on how soil properties relate to ammonia volatilization loss from surface-applied, unincorporated UAN and urea on various soils. Controlled environment incubation experiments were conducted to evaluate ammonia volatilization potential of commonly used urea-containing fertilizers, and to correlate these losses to selected soil properties. A completely randomized design with four replicates was used to evaluate and correlate ammonia loss from urea and UAN applied onto eight soils at a rate of 134 kg N ha−1. Urea was more susceptible to ammonia loss (21% of applied N) than UAN (3.3% of applied N) in soils with pH < 7. In contrast, the losses from UAN were either higher or comparable to urea for soils with pH > 7. A significant and strong relationship was evident between ammonia loss from UAN and soil pH (R2 = 0.84), soil organic matter (R2 = 0.65), clay content (R2 = 0.69), and container capacity (R2 = 0.90). In contrast, the loss relationships observed for the urea and these properties were insignificant. Stepwise regression analysis identified clay content and soil pH as the most influential factors affecting ammonia loss from both urea and UAN applications. In conclusion, high initial soil pH significantly increases ammonia loss for surface-applied UAN but not for urea, suggesting that different soil management strategies may be needed depending on the N fertilizer source used.
在不同土壤中,硝酸铵和尿素的组成和击穿途径不同,但关于土壤性质与地表施用、未掺入的硝酸铵和尿素的氨挥发损失之间的关系的信息有限。通过可控环境培养试验,评价了常用含尿素肥料的氨挥发潜力,并将这些损失与选定的土壤性质联系起来。采用4个重复的完全随机设计,评价了在134 kg N ha−1的施氮量下8种土壤上尿素和UAN的氨损失及其相关性。在pH <的土壤中,尿素(占施氮量的21%)比UAN(占施氮量的3.3%)更容易受到氨损失的影响。相比之下,在pH = gt; 7的土壤中,UAN的损失要么高于尿素,要么与尿素相当。土壤pH值(R2 = 0.84)、土壤有机质(R2 = 0.65)、粘土含量(R2 = 0.69)和容器容量(R2 = 0.90)与UAN氨损失呈显著强相关。相比之下,尿素的损失与这些性质之间的关系微不足道。逐步回归分析发现,粘土含量和土壤pH值是影响尿素和UAN施用中氨损失的最重要因素。综上所述,高初始土壤pH值显著增加了表层施用的UAN的氨损失,但对尿素没有影响,这表明根据所使用的氮肥来源,可能需要不同的土壤管理策略。
{"title":"Soil properties that influence ammonia loss from surface-applied, unincorporated urea-based fertilizer","authors":"Samuel Okai, Sydney Logwood, Lori Duncan, Daniel Yoder, Debasish Saha, Xinhua Yin, Jones Akuaku, Nutifafa Adotey","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70269","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The composition and breakdown paths of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) and urea are different, but there is limited information on how soil properties relate to ammonia volatilization loss from surface-applied, unincorporated UAN and urea on various soils. Controlled environment incubation experiments were conducted to evaluate ammonia volatilization potential of commonly used urea-containing fertilizers, and to correlate these losses to selected soil properties. A completely randomized design with four replicates was used to evaluate and correlate ammonia loss from urea and UAN applied onto eight soils at a rate of 134 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. Urea was more susceptible to ammonia loss (21% of applied N) than UAN (3.3% of applied N) in soils with pH < 7. In contrast, the losses from UAN were either higher or comparable to urea for soils with pH > 7. A significant and strong relationship was evident between ammonia loss from UAN and soil pH (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.84), soil organic matter (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.65), clay content (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.69), and container capacity (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.90). In contrast, the loss relationships observed for the urea and these properties were insignificant. Stepwise regression analysis identified clay content and soil pH as the most influential factors affecting ammonia loss from both urea and UAN applications. In conclusion, high initial soil pH significantly increases ammonia loss for surface-applied UAN but not for urea, suggesting that different soil management strategies may be needed depending on the N fertilizer source used.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70269","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ye Jin Kim, Jeong Wook Jo, Jae Hun Kim, Gyu Won Lee, Kwang Jin Kim, Ho Hyun Kim, Hyung Joo Kim
Precise nondestructive methods for monitoring soil water content (SWC) are essential for maintaining plant growth and metabolic activity. In this study, an inductance-based monitoring system was developed using a solenoid-coil sensor for continuous in situ SWC measurements. Three plant species, Melissa officinalis L., Ficus benghalensis L., and Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Sweet, were selected as the experimental plants based on their distinct leaf morphologies and stomatal traits. In the control experiments, the inductance variation showed a strong linear correlation with soil moisture meter-based SWC (r2 = 0.900, p < 0.001). When the system was applied to live experimental plants, plant species-specific differences in water consumption rates were monitored. The system showed a strong relationship between photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) and the inductance-based SWC. These results indicate that the inductance measurement system supports rapid, reliable, and noninvasive plant cultivation based on an accurate watering schedule and enhanced water-use efficiency.
精确的无损监测土壤含水量(SWC)的方法对于维持植物生长和代谢活动至关重要。在本研究中,开发了一种基于电感的监测系统,使用电磁线圈传感器进行连续原位SWC测量。三种植物:梅莉莎、榕树和大叶竹。根据不同的叶片形态和气孔特征,选择甜瓜作为实验植物。在对照实验中,电感变化与基于土壤湿度计的SWC呈强线性相关(r2 = 0.900, p < 0.001)。当该系统应用于活的实验植物时,监测了植物物种特有的耗水率差异。该系统显示光合效率(Fv/Fm)与基于电感的SWC之间有很强的关系。这些结果表明,电感测量系统基于精确的浇水计划和提高的水分利用效率,支持快速、可靠和无创的植物栽培。
{"title":"A simple soil water content measurement system for plant cultivation","authors":"Ye Jin Kim, Jeong Wook Jo, Jae Hun Kim, Gyu Won Lee, Kwang Jin Kim, Ho Hyun Kim, Hyung Joo Kim","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70276","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Precise nondestructive methods for monitoring soil water content (SWC) are essential for maintaining plant growth and metabolic activity. In this study, an inductance-based monitoring system was developed using a solenoid-coil sensor for continuous in situ SWC measurements. Three plant species, <i>Melissa officinalis</i> L., <i>Ficus benghalensis</i> L., and <i>Podocarpus macrophyllus</i> (Thunb.) Sweet, were selected as the experimental plants based on their distinct leaf morphologies and stomatal traits. In the control experiments, the inductance variation showed a strong linear correlation with soil moisture meter-based SWC (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.900, <i>p</i> < 0.001). When the system was applied to live experimental plants, plant species-specific differences in water consumption rates were monitored. The system showed a strong relationship between photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) and the inductance-based SWC. These results indicate that the inductance measurement system supports rapid, reliable, and noninvasive plant cultivation based on an accurate watering schedule and enhanced water-use efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}