Islam, M. R., Alam, M. A., Rahman, M. M., Shahin-Uz-Zaman, M., Iqbal, M. S., El-Sabagh, A., Ismaan, H. N., Islam, M. A., Sultana, N., & Islam, M. S. (2025). Optimizing water-stressed mungbean for climate-smart sustainable intensification: Potassium's role in improving soil moisture, physio-biochemical traits, and yield sustainability. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8, e70209. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70209
The last name of co-author Hassan Nuur Ismaan has been corrected from “Issman” to “Ismaan” in the byline, the Author Contributions and How to Cite This Article sections.
The sixth byline has been updated from “Somali Agricultural Research and Technology Centre (SARTEC), Somali, Somalia” to “Faculty of Agriculture, Jazeera University, Mogadishu, Somalia.”
{"title":"Correction to “Optimizing water-stressed mungbean for climate-smart sustainable intensification: Potassium's role in improving soil moisture, physio-biochemical traits, and yield sustainability”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70240","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Islam, M. R., Alam, M. A., Rahman, M. M., Shahin-Uz-Zaman, M., Iqbal, M. S., El-Sabagh, A., Ismaan, H. N., Islam, M. A., Sultana, N., & Islam, M. S. (2025). Optimizing water-stressed mungbean for climate-smart sustainable intensification: Potassium's role in improving soil moisture, physio-biochemical traits, and yield sustainability. <i>Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment</i>, <i>8</i>, e70209. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70209</p><p>The last name of co-author Hassan Nuur Ismaan has been corrected from “Issman” to “Ismaan” in the byline, the Author Contributions and How to Cite This Article sections.</p><p>The sixth byline has been updated from “Somali Agricultural Research and Technology Centre (SARTEC), Somali, Somalia” to “Faculty of Agriculture, Jazeera University, Mogadishu, Somalia.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70240","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maize (Zea mays L.) production in Ethiopia spans across various agro-ecologies, encompassing humid highland, humid midland, dry lowland, and humid lowland areas. Identifying well-adapted and productive genotypes for target production environments could be achieved by evaluating new experimental hybrids across various representative test environments. This study aimed to examine the mean grain yield performance, grain yield stability, and genotype-by-environment interaction of quality protein maize (QPM) hybrids evaluated across environments in Ethiopia. Forty-eight QPM experimental hybrids, along with two commercial check hybrids, were evaluated across six environments. Analysis of variance for grain yield exhibited highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) differences due to genotype, environment, and genotype by environment interaction (GEI). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis revealed that genotype, environment, and GEI effects contributed to 4.57%, 78.59%, and 16.84% of the total variation, respectively. The first two interaction principal component axes (IPCAs) explained 66.29% of the total variations attributed to GEI sum of squares, indicating that these IPCAs captured most of the interaction effects. The AMMI stability value identified G5, G19, G22, and G42 as stable and high-yielding QPM hybrids, while G5 was the most stable genotype identified by yield stability index analysis. Genotype main effects plus GEI (GGE) biplot analysis identified G13, G14, and G25 as the most desirable hybrids. Among the test environments, Holeta was identified as an ideal test environment, exhibiting the highest discriminating power among the tested hybrids and the most representative of the test environments. The polygon view of GGE biplot subdivided the testing environments into different groups, mainly represented by Holeta, and Haramayaand Kulumsa. Among the various analytical models, the GGE biplot proved to be the most effective and precise tool for identifying high-yielding and stable hybrids. Results of this study indicated the possibility of developing stable and high-yielding QPM hybrids suited to representative maize production environments.
{"title":"Grain yield stability and genotype by environment interaction of quality protein maize hybrids in Ethiopia","authors":"Diriba Beyene, Dagne Wegary, Bulti Tesso, Zerihun Jalata, Negash Geleta, Kasahun Sadessa","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70236","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production in Ethiopia spans across various agro-ecologies, encompassing humid highland, humid midland, dry lowland, and humid lowland areas. Identifying well-adapted and productive genotypes for target production environments could be achieved by evaluating new experimental hybrids across various representative test environments. This study aimed to examine the mean grain yield performance, grain yield stability, and genotype-by-environment interaction of quality protein maize (QPM) hybrids evaluated across environments in Ethiopia. Forty-eight QPM experimental hybrids, along with two commercial check hybrids, were evaluated across six environments. Analysis of variance for grain yield exhibited highly significant (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) differences due to genotype, environment, and genotype by environment interaction (GEI). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis revealed that genotype, environment, and GEI effects contributed to 4.57%, 78.59%, and 16.84% of the total variation, respectively. The first two interaction principal component axes (IPCAs) explained 66.29% of the total variations attributed to GEI sum of squares, indicating that these IPCAs captured most of the interaction effects. The AMMI stability value identified G5, G19, G22, and G42 as stable and high-yielding QPM hybrids, while G5 was the most stable genotype identified by yield stability index analysis. Genotype main effects plus GEI (GGE) biplot analysis identified G13, G14, and G25 as the most desirable hybrids. Among the test environments, Holeta was identified as an ideal test environment, exhibiting the highest discriminating power among the tested hybrids and the most representative of the test environments. The polygon view of GGE biplot subdivided the testing environments into different groups, mainly represented by Holeta, and Haramayaand Kulumsa. Among the various analytical models, the GGE biplot proved to be the most effective and precise tool for identifying high-yielding and stable hybrids. Results of this study indicated the possibility of developing stable and high-yielding QPM hybrids suited to representative maize production environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70236","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hussam F. N. Alawadi, Magdi T. Abdelhamid, Amir M. H. Ibrahim, Nithya K. Subramanian, Stanley Omar P. B. Samonte
Aromatic rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation is economically essential, but its successful production depends on genotype adaptability and stability across different environments. In Texas, where environmental conditions can vary substantially between regions, it is essential to develop aromatic rice varieties that deliver high yields and maintain stability in diverse growing conditions. This study aimed to assess the performance and adaptability of 120 aromatic rice genotypes across two distinct environments, Beaumont and Eagle Lake, and to identify superior genotypes for each location. The study was conducted at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center in Beaumont and Eagle Lake, TX, and was motivated by the need to develop rice varieties with improved yield and stability under diverse environmental conditions. We assessed diverse morphological and agronomic traits and used genotype main effect plus genotype-by-environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis to elucidate genotype–environment interactions. Our results revealed significant variations in several characteristics, including days to heading, plant height, and grain yield, among genotypes and across locations. GGE biplot analysis allowed us to identify the best-performing genotypes for each environment, with G85 and G98 excelling in Beaumont and G73 and G90 performing well in Eagle Lake. Furthermore, the analysis provided insights into genotype stability, revealing G27 as a highly stable genotype with above-average grain yield. Cluster analysis categorized the genotypes into four distinct groups based on their overall trait performance. This study highlights the importance of multi-environment trials in aromatic rice breeding programs. It demonstrates the utility of GGE biplot and cluster analysis for identifying superior genotypes with high yield potential and adaptability to specific environments. The findings can be valuable for developing region-specific cultivars and enhancing rice production in diverse agro-ecological zones.
{"title":"GGE biplot analysis of aromatic rice yield stability and adaptability in Texas","authors":"Hussam F. N. Alawadi, Magdi T. Abdelhamid, Amir M. H. Ibrahim, Nithya K. Subramanian, Stanley Omar P. B. Samonte","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aromatic rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i>) cultivation is economically essential, but its successful production depends on genotype adaptability and stability across different environments. In Texas, where environmental conditions can vary substantially between regions, it is essential to develop aromatic rice varieties that deliver high yields and maintain stability in diverse growing conditions. This study aimed to assess the performance and adaptability of 120 aromatic rice genotypes across two distinct environments, Beaumont and Eagle Lake, and to identify superior genotypes for each location. The study was conducted at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center in Beaumont and Eagle Lake, TX, and was motivated by the need to develop rice varieties with improved yield and stability under diverse environmental conditions. We assessed diverse morphological and agronomic traits and used genotype main effect plus genotype-by-environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis to elucidate genotype–environment interactions. Our results revealed significant variations in several characteristics, including days to heading, plant height, and grain yield, among genotypes and across locations. GGE biplot analysis allowed us to identify the best-performing genotypes for each environment, with G85 and G98 excelling in Beaumont and G73 and G90 performing well in Eagle Lake. Furthermore, the analysis provided insights into genotype stability, revealing G27 as a highly stable genotype with above-average grain yield. Cluster analysis categorized the genotypes into four distinct groups based on their overall trait performance. This study highlights the importance of multi-environment trials in aromatic rice breeding programs. It demonstrates the utility of GGE biplot and cluster analysis for identifying superior genotypes with high yield potential and adaptability to specific environments. The findings can be valuable for developing region-specific cultivars and enhancing rice production in diverse agro-ecological zones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70216","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jacob Danso, Jacob Ulzen, Moses Ahenkan, Ophelia Osei Ulzen, Rechiatu Asei, Joseph Sarkodie-Addo, Christopher Appiah-Agyei
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is an important crop for addressing food security in Africa, especially Ghana. However, its production is limited by soil nutrient deficiencies, particularly nitrogen (N). This study aimed to assess the impact of N fertilizer application and inoculation on the growth and yield of cowpea. A factorial experiment was conducted with two inoculant strains (WB74and BR 3262) and four N fertilizer levels (0, 15, 30, and 45 kg N/ha) laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plant height, branching, leaf number, yield components, N fixation, and N derived from the atmosphere were measured. At 25 and 35 days after planting (DAP), the 45 kg N/ha treatment produced the tallest plants, which was significantly higher than those from other treatments. Both inoculant strains improved growth compared to the control. The 45 kg N/ha treatment had the most branches, while the 30 kg N/ha treatment had the most nodules per plant. At 40 DAP, the WB74 had the most effective nodules. The 45 kg N/ha treatment produced the highest grain yield, and the BR 3262 strain outperformed the control and WB74. N fixation and N derived from the atmosphere were highest with the 45 kg N/ha treatment, and the BR 3262 inoculant had greater N fixation than the other treatments. For optimal cowpea growth, N fixation, and yield, a combination of N fertilizer application and inoculation should not be overlooked.
豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)Walp.)是解决非洲,特别是加纳粮食安全问题的重要作物。然而,它的生产受到土壤养分缺乏,特别是氮(N)的限制。本试验旨在评价施氮和接种对豇豆生长和产量的影响。试验采用随机完全区组设计,采用2个接种菌株wb74和BR 3262, 4个施氮水平(0、15、30和45 kg N/ha), 4个重复。测定了株高、分枝、叶数、产量组成、固氮和大气氮源。在种植后25和35 d (DAP), 45 kg N/ha处理植株最高,显著高于其他处理。与对照相比,两种接种菌株都促进了生长。45 kg N/ha处理单株分枝数最多,30 kg N/ha处理单株根瘤数最多。在40 DAP时,WB74有最有效的结节。45 kg N/ha处理产量最高,且BR 3262优于对照和WB74。以45 kg N/ha处理的固氮和来自大气的氮最高,且br3262接种剂的固氮效果优于其他处理。为了获得最佳的豇豆生长、固氮和产量,施用氮肥和接种氮肥的组合不应被忽视。
{"title":"Growth and yield response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] to nitrogen fertilizer and inoculant application","authors":"Jacob Danso, Jacob Ulzen, Moses Ahenkan, Ophelia Osei Ulzen, Rechiatu Asei, Joseph Sarkodie-Addo, Christopher Appiah-Agyei","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70237","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cowpea (<i>Vigna unguiculata</i> (L.) Walp.), is an important crop for addressing food security in Africa, especially Ghana. However, its production is limited by soil nutrient deficiencies, particularly nitrogen (N). This study aimed to assess the impact of N fertilizer application and inoculation on the growth and yield of cowpea. A factorial experiment was conducted with two inoculant strains (WB74and BR 3262) and four N fertilizer levels (0, 15, 30, and 45 kg N/ha) laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plant height, branching, leaf number, yield components, N fixation, and N derived from the atmosphere were measured. At 25 and 35 days after planting (DAP), the 45 kg N/ha treatment produced the tallest plants, which was significantly higher than those from other treatments. Both inoculant strains improved growth compared to the control. The 45 kg N/ha treatment had the most branches, while the 30 kg N/ha treatment had the most nodules per plant. At 40 DAP, the WB74 had the most effective nodules. The 45 kg N/ha treatment produced the highest grain yield, and the BR 3262 strain outperformed the control and WB74. N fixation and N derived from the atmosphere were highest with the 45 kg N/ha treatment, and the BR 3262 inoculant had greater N fixation than the other treatments. For optimal cowpea growth, N fixation, and yield, a combination of N fertilizer application and inoculation should not be overlooked.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70237","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammad M. Almutari, Ganga M. Hettiarachchi, Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz, Allan Fritz, Johnathon D. Holman, Yared Assefa
Zinc malnutrition ranks fifth in terms of the leading cause of disease in developing countries. Agronomic biofortification is an effective way to increase micronutrient concentrations in grain crops. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of various Zn sources (organic and inorganic) with and without organic C-based co-additives (AVAIL and humic acid) on the biofortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with Zn in a mildly calcareous soil. Specifically, the objective is to determine the distribution (stems/leaves, whole grain, bran, and flour) and bioavailability of Zn in different plant parts. The results of this study indicated that application of inorganic Zn in various forms significantly increased grain yield from 26% to 41% compared with the fertilized control. Similarly, grain Zn concentration in wheat increased by 58% when applied as ZnO and by 30% when Zn is applied as ZnSO4. Flour phytate (PA) to Zn ratio with the addition of Zn as ZnSO4 and ZnO with and without co-additives to the soil was relatively lower (<8) than with the addition of granular Zn (>10) treatments (MAP-ZnSO4 and MAP-ZnO), with and without co-additives, and low PA:Zn ratio ensures increased Zn bioavailability. Between the two, less soluble ZnO showed more promising results (greater Zn concentration in whole grain, bran, and aboveground biomass) compared to soluble ZnSO4. Co-additives did not improve soil Zn extractability or Zn uptake by wheat. We concluded that Zn application resulted in successful biofortification of wheat grain with Zn while simultaneously increasing yield. This is a greenhouse study under controlled environmental conditions, and therefore, we recommend further field research in multiple years and locations to confirm or challenge these results.
{"title":"Agronomic biofortification of wheat with zinc through co-addition of organic carbon with zinc fertilizers","authors":"Mohammad M. Almutari, Ganga M. Hettiarachchi, Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz, Allan Fritz, Johnathon D. Holman, Yared Assefa","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70228","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zinc malnutrition ranks fifth in terms of the leading cause of disease in developing countries. Agronomic biofortification is an effective way to increase micronutrient concentrations in grain crops. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of various Zn sources (organic and inorganic) with and without organic C-based co-additives (AVAIL and humic acid) on the biofortification of wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) with Zn in a mildly calcareous soil. Specifically, the objective is to determine the distribution (stems/leaves, whole grain, bran, and flour) and bioavailability of Zn in different plant parts. The results of this study indicated that application of inorganic Zn in various forms significantly increased grain yield from 26% to 41% compared with the fertilized control. Similarly, grain Zn concentration in wheat increased by 58% when applied as ZnO and by 30% when Zn is applied as ZnSO<sub>4</sub>. Flour phytate (PA) to Zn ratio with the addition of Zn as ZnSO<sub>4</sub> and ZnO with and without co-additives to the soil was relatively lower (<8) than with the addition of granular Zn (>10) treatments (MAP-ZnSO<sub>4</sub> and MAP-ZnO), with and without co-additives, and low PA:Zn ratio ensures increased Zn bioavailability. Between the two, less soluble ZnO showed more promising results (greater Zn concentration in whole grain, bran, and aboveground biomass) compared to soluble ZnSO<sub>4</sub>. Co-additives did not improve soil Zn extractability or Zn uptake by wheat. We concluded that Zn application resulted in successful biofortification of wheat grain with Zn while simultaneously increasing yield. This is a greenhouse study under controlled environmental conditions, and therefore, we recommend further field research in multiple years and locations to confirm or challenge these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70228","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maureen M. Kahiu, Benjamin D. Pritchard, José J. Vargas, Gregory K. Breeden, James T. Brosnan
Divots are pieces of the turfgrass sward removed when golf clubs strike playing surfaces with impact energy that exceeds turfgrass shear strength. Divot resistance and recovery are factors affecting turfgrass species and cultivar selection for golf courses. Research was conducted in Knoxville, TN, during 2022 and 2023, evaluating divot resistance and recovery of two hybrid bermudagrasses [C. dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy, cv. Tifway (TIF) and cv. Latitude 36 (L36)] and one creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L., cv. L93-XD). A third hybrid bermudagrass (Tahoma 31 [T31]) was included in 2023. A pendulum apparatus was used to create 100 divots on each surface in May each year. Divot resistance was indirectly quantified by measuring the volume of sand used to fill each divot scar. Divot recovery was evaluated via visual assessments of turfgrass cover within the divot scar over time. Divot recovery data were fit to a nonlinear regression model to determine days required to reach 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% recovery (i.e., Days25, Days50, Days75, and Days95). Divot resistance for TIF, L36, and T31 was greater than L93-XD each year. Divot recovery was faster on hybrid bermudagrass in 2022 (Days95 = 28–44) than 2023 (Days95 = 40–77 days); the opposite response was observed on creeping bentgrass with fewer days required for recovery in 2023 compared to 2022. Among hybrid bermudagrasses, Days95 values were lowest for T31 and highest for TIF, with L36 ranking intermediate. However, T31 data were limited to a single year.
{"title":"Exploring divot resistance and recovery of select turfgrasses used on golf courses","authors":"Maureen M. Kahiu, Benjamin D. Pritchard, José J. Vargas, Gregory K. Breeden, James T. Brosnan","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70238","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Divots are pieces of the turfgrass sward removed when golf clubs strike playing surfaces with impact energy that exceeds turfgrass shear strength. Divot resistance and recovery are factors affecting turfgrass species and cultivar selection for golf courses. Research was conducted in Knoxville, TN, during 2022 and 2023, evaluating divot resistance and recovery of two hybrid bermudagrasses [<i>C. dactylon</i> (L.) Pers. × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> Burtt-Davy, cv. Tifway (TIF) and cv. Latitude 36 (L36)] and one creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L., cv. L93-XD). A third hybrid bermudagrass (Tahoma 31 [T31]) was included in 2023. A pendulum apparatus was used to create 100 divots on each surface in May each year. Divot resistance was indirectly quantified by measuring the volume of sand used to fill each divot scar. Divot recovery was evaluated via visual assessments of turfgrass cover within the divot scar over time. Divot recovery data were fit to a nonlinear regression model to determine days required to reach 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% recovery (i.e., Days<sub>25</sub>, Days<sub>50</sub>, Days<sub>75,</sub> and Days<sub>95</sub>). Divot resistance for TIF, L36, and T31 was greater than L93-XD each year. Divot recovery was faster on hybrid bermudagrass in 2022 (Days<sub>95</sub> = 28–44) than 2023 (Days<sub>95</sub> = 40–77 days); the opposite response was observed on creeping bentgrass with fewer days required for recovery in 2023 compared to 2022. Among hybrid bermudagrasses, Days<sub>95</sub> values were lowest for T31 and highest for TIF, with L36 ranking intermediate. However, T31 data were limited to a single year.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70238","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil surfactants are applied to recreational turfgrass areas like golf course putting greens to help improve water infiltration, distribution, and uniformity. Most commercially available surfactant labels recommend immediate post-application irrigation (PAI) to maximize product efficacy. However, many turfgrass managers may forgo PAI due to potential concerns of excess surface wetness, reduced surface firmness, or time constraints with golf play. A field study was conducted in 2024 to evaluate the effect of immediate PAI for two surfactant chemistries ([polyoxyalkylene polymer [PP] [8.0 L ha−1] and a blend of alkoxylated ethylene oxide-propylene oxide adducts/nonionic polyols [AEPA] [6.4 L ha−1]) on a sand-based creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) research green in West Lafayette, IN. Surfactants were initially applied on May 30, 2024 and reapplied every 14 days for a total of nine applications and received either immediate PAI with 0.5 cm water or scheduled nightly irrigation approximately 18 h after application across the study area. Visual turfgrass quality, percentage of turfgrass stress, soil volumetric water content (VWC), and water droplet penetration time (WDPT) were measured. Both surfactants improved seasonal quality and reduced stress/wilt with or without immediate PAI. Compared to the non-treated control, the surfactants increased VWC and reduced WDPT in the upper 0–1 cm in early September. Immediate PAI increased average VWC and reduced WDPT in late summer compared to the non-treated control. This 1-year field study reinforces the value of immediate PAI to maximize surfactant efficacy and turfgrass health, especially during late-summer stress.
土壤表面活性剂被应用于休闲草坪区域,如高尔夫球场的果岭,以帮助改善水的渗透、分布和均匀性。大多数市售表面活性剂标签建议立即应用后灌溉(PAI),以最大限度地提高产品功效。然而,许多草坪管理者可能会放弃PAI,因为潜在的担心表面过度潮湿,表面硬度降低,或高尔夫比赛的时间限制。研究了两种表面活性剂(聚氧亚烯聚合物[PP] [8.0 L ha−1]和烷氧化环氧乙烷-环氧丙烷加合物/非离子多元醇[AEPA] [6.4 L ha−1])的直接PAI对美国西拉斐特(West Lafayette)沙地匍生草(Agrostis stolonifera L.)研究绿地的影响。表面活性剂最初于2024年5月30日施用,每14天重新施用一次,共9次施用,在整个研究区域施用后大约18小时,立即用0.5厘米的水进行PAI或定期夜间灌溉。测定了草坪草的视觉质量、草坪草应力百分比、土壤体积含水量(VWC)和水滴渗透时间(WDPT)。两种表面活性剂都改善了季节性品质,并减少了胁迫/枯萎,无论是否具有即时PAI。9月初,与未处理的对照相比,表面活性剂增加了0 ~ 1 cm上部的VWC,降低了WDPT。与未处理的对照相比,即时PAI增加了夏末的平均VWC,降低了WDPT。这项为期一年的实地研究强调了即时PAI在最大限度地提高表面活性剂效果和草坪草健康方面的价值,特别是在夏末的压力下。
{"title":"Post-application irrigation effect on surfactant efficacy applied to a sand-based putting green","authors":"Jada S. Powlen, Cale A. Bigelow","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil surfactants are applied to recreational turfgrass areas like golf course putting greens to help improve water infiltration, distribution, and uniformity. Most commercially available surfactant labels recommend immediate post-application irrigation (PAI) to maximize product efficacy. However, many turfgrass managers may forgo PAI due to potential concerns of excess surface wetness, reduced surface firmness, or time constraints with golf play. A field study was conducted in 2024 to evaluate the effect of immediate PAI for two surfactant chemistries ([polyoxyalkylene polymer [PP] [8.0 L ha<sup>−1</sup>] and a blend of alkoxylated ethylene oxide-propylene oxide adducts/nonionic polyols [AEPA] [6.4 L ha<sup>−1</sup>]) on a sand-based creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) research green in West Lafayette, IN. Surfactants were initially applied on May 30, 2024 and reapplied every 14 days for a total of nine applications and received either immediate PAI with 0.5 cm water or scheduled nightly irrigation approximately 18 h after application across the study area. Visual turfgrass quality, percentage of turfgrass stress, soil volumetric water content (VWC), and water droplet penetration time (WDPT) were measured. Both surfactants improved seasonal quality and reduced stress/wilt with or without immediate PAI. Compared to the non-treated control, the surfactants increased VWC and reduced WDPT in the upper 0–1 cm in early September. Immediate PAI increased average VWC and reduced WDPT in late summer compared to the non-treated control. This 1-year field study reinforces the value of immediate PAI to maximize surfactant efficacy and turfgrass health, especially during late-summer stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70227","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gunasekhar Nachimuthu, Blake Palmer, Hiz Jamali, Andy Hundt, Stacey Cunningham, Duy P. Le, Graeme Schwenke
Soil compaction commonly impacts productivity in Australian cotton production systems. A field experiment conducted during the 2019–2020 season showed that compaction decreased lint yield by 27%. The objective of this study is to evaluate the legacy effect of soil compaction on subsequent crop yields (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] in 2020 and 2022 and cotton [Gossypium hirsutum L.] in 2021–2022). Wheat and cotton yields, cotton biomass, Verticillium wilt incidence in cotton, soil water, and soil strength were assessed. There was no legacy effect of soil compaction on the wheat grain yields in the 2020 and 2022 seasons. The lack of difference in wheat yields is the result of sufficient rainfall recharging the soil profile during the growing season to overcome compaction limitations of deeper soil water extraction. Similarly, there was no legacy effect of soil compaction on cotton lint yield or fiber quality in the 2021–2022 crop. We found no difference in soil strength (penetrometer resistance) or soil water use by cotton during the 2021–2022 season. These results suggest, indirectly, that cotton root systems were not constrained from extracting water from lower depths of the soil. Verticillium wilt was absent in the compacted plots, and its incidence reached 15.3% in the uncompacted plots during the 2021–2022 season. The legacy effect of soil compaction may not impact subsequent crop yields under the right climatic conditions. However, a study conducted during dry years could offer further insights into its long-term impact. Future research should be expanded to explore the relationship between disease incidence and soil compaction.
{"title":"Compaction effects on crop yields in Vertisols: Transient under wet years","authors":"Gunasekhar Nachimuthu, Blake Palmer, Hiz Jamali, Andy Hundt, Stacey Cunningham, Duy P. Le, Graeme Schwenke","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70220","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil compaction commonly impacts productivity in Australian cotton production systems. A field experiment conducted during the 2019–2020 season showed that compaction decreased lint yield by 27%. The objective of this study is to evaluate the legacy effect of soil compaction on subsequent crop yields (wheat [<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.] in 2020 and 2022 and cotton [<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.] in 2021–2022). Wheat and cotton yields, cotton biomass, Verticillium wilt incidence in cotton, soil water, and soil strength were assessed. There was no legacy effect of soil compaction on the wheat grain yields in the 2020 and 2022 seasons. The lack of difference in wheat yields is the result of sufficient rainfall recharging the soil profile during the growing season to overcome compaction limitations of deeper soil water extraction. Similarly, there was no legacy effect of soil compaction on cotton lint yield or fiber quality in the 2021–2022 crop. We found no difference in soil strength (penetrometer resistance) or soil water use by cotton during the 2021–2022 season. These results suggest, indirectly, that cotton root systems were not constrained from extracting water from lower depths of the soil. Verticillium wilt was absent in the compacted plots, and its incidence reached 15.3% in the uncompacted plots during the 2021–2022 season. The legacy effect of soil compaction may not impact subsequent crop yields under the right climatic conditions. However, a study conducted during dry years could offer further insights into its long-term impact. Future research should be expanded to explore the relationship between disease incidence and soil compaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70220","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145317108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hannah Voye, Christopher Graham, Rhoda Burrows, Kristine M. Lang
Much of the research for tarping and soil health has taken place in the northeastern United States, and minimal research has applied early season tarping in a drier, sunnier climate such as the US Midwest. This study in Brookings, SD, evaluated soil health impact from early season (April through May) solarization and occultation at different durations (6, 4, and 2 weeks) used for weed control in onion (Allium cepa) production during 2023 and 2024. Solarization was conducted using greenhouse plastic, while occultation was evaluated using both white side up and black side up silage tarps. A randomized complete block design with four blocks and ten treatment plots per block, including an untarped, tilled control, was established. Immediately following tarp removal, clear and untarped control plots were tilled to remove high weed pressure, and all planting beds were harrowed within each plot where onions were planted. Soil response variables included inorganic nitrogen (N), soil respiration, active carbon (POXC), organic N, temperature, and moisture. Daily temperatures were up to 6°C higher in solarized plots compared to occultation plots during tarping. Occultation treatments showed trends of lower moisture during tarping and higher moisture during the growing season when compared to control plots. No differences were seen among tarp treatments for N, soil respiration, or POXC. While early season soil tarping used in the US Midwest can manipulate temperature, our research showed no significant impacts on other soil health indicators.
{"title":"Improving reduced tillage vegetable systems for the Northern Great Plains: How does early season soil tarping (solarization and occultation) impact soil health?","authors":"Hannah Voye, Christopher Graham, Rhoda Burrows, Kristine M. Lang","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70230","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much of the research for tarping and soil health has taken place in the northeastern United States, and minimal research has applied early season tarping in a drier, sunnier climate such as the US Midwest. This study in Brookings, SD, evaluated soil health impact from early season (April through May) solarization and occultation at different durations (6, 4, and 2 weeks) used for weed control in onion (<i>Allium cepa</i>) production during 2023 and 2024. Solarization was conducted using greenhouse plastic, while occultation was evaluated using both white side up and black side up silage tarps. A randomized complete block design with four blocks and ten treatment plots per block, including an untarped, tilled control, was established. Immediately following tarp removal, clear and untarped control plots were tilled to remove high weed pressure, and all planting beds were harrowed within each plot where onions were planted. Soil response variables included inorganic nitrogen (N), soil respiration, active carbon (POXC), organic N, temperature, and moisture. Daily temperatures were up to 6°C higher in solarized plots compared to occultation plots during tarping. Occultation treatments showed trends of lower moisture during tarping and higher moisture during the growing season when compared to control plots. No differences were seen among tarp treatments for N, soil respiration, or POXC. While early season soil tarping used in the US Midwest can manipulate temperature, our research showed no significant impacts on other soil health indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70230","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145317147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lawrence Aula, Amanda C. Easterly, Milena Maria Tomaz de Oliveira, Cody F. Creech
Achieving greater productivity and ecological sustainability of agricultural soils requires moving beyond conventional management practices. No-till (NT) enhances soil health while presenting weed management and nutrient stratification challenges. Occasional tillage (OT) carried out once every 6 years presents a chance for alleviating these problems without altering soil quality and research in this field continues evolving. This study evaluated the effect of a change from NT to OT on soil health while relating their performance to native sods consisting of native prairie vegetation. The long-term tillage study was established in 1970 as winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow. Original treatments included continuous NT, stubble mulch (SM), moldboard plow (MP), and native sod. In 2010–2011, the plots associated with NT, SM, and MP were each split into two and assigned either NT or OT. Here, we used the original NT plots (comprising of OT and NT) and native sods. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 cm. Soil organic carbon, active carbon, respiration, and protein were not substantially different between NT and OT (p ≥ 0.05). The same soil health indicators with OT and NT were substantially low compared with native sod (p < 0.00001) and were of the order native sod > NT = OT. Depending on the indicator considered, soil health differences between tillage practices and native sod were variable with the difference ranging from 28 % to 182 %. For over 14 years encompassing two OT events, soil health indicators remain unaltered relative to NT, offering a potential solution to weed and pest management challenges associated with continuous NT.
{"title":"Soil health unaltered by conversion from no-till to occasional tillage","authors":"Lawrence Aula, Amanda C. Easterly, Milena Maria Tomaz de Oliveira, Cody F. Creech","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70234","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Achieving greater productivity and ecological sustainability of agricultural soils requires moving beyond conventional management practices. No-till (NT) enhances soil health while presenting weed management and nutrient stratification challenges. Occasional tillage (OT) carried out once every 6 years presents a chance for alleviating these problems without altering soil quality and research in this field continues evolving. This study evaluated the effect of a change from NT to OT on soil health while relating their performance to native sods consisting of native prairie vegetation. The long-term tillage study was established in 1970 as winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.)–fallow. Original treatments included continuous NT, stubble mulch (SM), moldboard plow (MP), and native sod. In 2010–2011, the plots associated with NT, SM, and MP were each split into two and assigned either NT or OT. Here, we used the original NT plots (comprising of OT and NT) and native sods. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 cm. Soil organic carbon, active carbon, respiration, and protein were not substantially different between NT and OT (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05). The same soil health indicators with OT and NT were substantially low compared with native sod (<i>p <</i> 0.00001) and were of the order native sod > NT = OT. Depending on the indicator considered, soil health differences between tillage practices and native sod were variable with the difference ranging from 28 % to 182 %. For over 14 years encompassing two OT events, soil health indicators remain unaltered relative to NT, offering a potential solution to weed and pest management challenges associated with continuous NT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70234","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145316934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}