首页 > 最新文献

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial and associated complications: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study LACC 试验后宫颈癌根治性切除术的方法及相关并发症:NSQIP 研究。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.008
Gabriel Levin MD , Pedro T. Ramirez MD , Jason D. Wright MD , Brian M. Slomovitz MD , Kacey M. Hamilton MD , Rebecca J. Schneyer MD , Moshe Barnajian MD , Yosef Nasseri MD , Matthew T. Siedhoff MD, MSCR , Kelly N. Wright MD , Raanan Meyer MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer study results revolutionized our understanding of the best surgical management for this disease. After its publication, the guidelines state that the standard and recommended approach for radical hysterectomy is an open abdominal approach. Nevertheless, the effect of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial on real-world changes in the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy remains elusive.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the trends and routes of radical hysterectomy and to evaluate postoperative complication rates before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (2018).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to examine radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed between 2012 and 2022. This study excluded vaginal radical hysterectomies and simple hysterectomies. The primary outcome measures were the trends in the route of surgery (minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy) and surgical complication rates, stratified by periods before and after the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial in 2018 (2012–2017 vs 2019–2022). The secondary outcome measure was major complications associated specifically with the different routes of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 3611 patients included, 2080 (57.6%) underwent laparotomy, and 1531 (42.4%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. There was a significant increase in the minimally invasive surgery approach from 2012 to 2017 (45.6% in minimally invasive surgery in 2012 to 75.3% in minimally invasive surgery in 2017; <em>P</em><.01) and a significant decrease in minimally invasive surgery from 2018 to 2022 (50.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2018 to 11.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2022; <em>P</em><.001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than after the trial (317 [16.9%] vs 288 [21.3%], respectively; <em>P</em>=.002). The major complication rates were similar before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (139 [7.4%] vs 78 [5.8%], respectively; <em>P</em>=.26). The rates of blood transfusions and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than in the period after the trial (137 [7.3%] vs 133 [9.8%] [<em>P</em>=.012] and 20 [1.1%] vs 53 [3.9%] [<em>P</em><.001], respectively). In a comparison of minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy radical hysterectomy during the entire study period, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had lower rates of minor complications than in those in the laparotomy group (190 [12.4%] vs 472 [22.7%], respectively; <em>P</em><.001), and the rates of major complications were similar in both groups (100
背景:宫颈癌腹腔镜手术(LACC)研究结果彻底改变了我们对该疾病最佳手术治疗方法的认识。该研究发表后,指南规定根治性子宫切除术的标准和推荐方法是开腹手术。然而,LACC 试验对现实世界中根治性子宫切除术手术方法变化的影响仍然难以捉摸:我们旨在研究根治性子宫切除术的趋势和途径,并评估 LACC 试验(2018 年)前后的术后并发症发生率:我们利用国家手术质量改进计划注册表对2012-2022年间因宫颈癌实施的根治性子宫切除术进行了研究。我们排除了阴道根治性子宫切除术和单纯子宫切除术。主要结局指标是手术路径[微创手术(MIS)与开腹手术]和手术并发症发生率的趋势,按2018年LACC试验发表前后的时间段进行分层(2012-2017年与2019-2022年)。次要结局指标是与不同手术路径具体相关的主要并发症:在纳入的3611名患者中,2080人(57.6%)接受了开腹手术,1531人(42.4%)接受了MIS根治性子宫切除术。从2012年到2017年,MIS方法明显增加(2012年MIS占45.6%,2017年MIS占75.3%,p结论:LACC试验后,MIS根治性子宫切除术的比例骤然下降,但术后主要并发症的发生率没有变化。此外,子宫切除术的途径与术后主要并发症无关。
{"title":"Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial and associated complications: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study","authors":"Gabriel Levin MD ,&nbsp;Pedro T. Ramirez MD ,&nbsp;Jason D. Wright MD ,&nbsp;Brian M. Slomovitz MD ,&nbsp;Kacey M. Hamilton MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Schneyer MD ,&nbsp;Moshe Barnajian MD ,&nbsp;Yosef Nasseri MD ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Siedhoff MD, MSCR ,&nbsp;Kelly N. Wright MD ,&nbsp;Raanan Meyer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer study results revolutionized our understanding of the best surgical management for this disease. After its publication, the guidelines state that the standard and recommended approach for radical hysterectomy is an open abdominal approach. Nevertheless, the effect of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial on real-world changes in the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy remains elusive.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study aimed to investigate the trends and routes of radical hysterectomy and to evaluate postoperative complication rates before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (2018).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to examine radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed between 2012 and 2022. This study excluded vaginal radical hysterectomies and simple hysterectomies. The primary outcome measures were the trends in the route of surgery (minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy) and surgical complication rates, stratified by periods before and after the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial in 2018 (2012–2017 vs 2019–2022). The secondary outcome measure was major complications associated specifically with the different routes of surgery.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Of the 3611 patients included, 2080 (57.6%) underwent laparotomy, and 1531 (42.4%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. There was a significant increase in the minimally invasive surgery approach from 2012 to 2017 (45.6% in minimally invasive surgery in 2012 to 75.3% in minimally invasive surgery in 2017; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt;.01) and a significant decrease in minimally invasive surgery from 2018 to 2022 (50.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2018 to 11.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2022; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt;.001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than after the trial (317 [16.9%] vs 288 [21.3%], respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=.002). The major complication rates were similar before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (139 [7.4%] vs 78 [5.8%], respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=.26). The rates of blood transfusions and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than in the period after the trial (137 [7.3%] vs 133 [9.8%] [&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=.012] and 20 [1.1%] vs 53 [3.9%] [&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt;.001], respectively). In a comparison of minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy radical hysterectomy during the entire study period, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had lower rates of minor complications than in those in the laparotomy group (190 [12.4%] vs 472 [22.7%], respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt;.001), and the rates of major complications were similar in both groups (100","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages 208.e1-208.e11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141995101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endometriosis of the Bartholin gland in a patient with deep endometriosis 一名深部子宫内膜异位症患者的巴氏腺体子宫内膜异位症。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.104
Sebastián Lavanderos MD , Valeria Puebla MD , Osman Barboza MD
{"title":"Endometriosis of the Bartholin gland in a patient with deep endometriosis","authors":"Sebastián Lavanderos MD ,&nbsp;Valeria Puebla MD ,&nbsp;Osman Barboza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.104","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.104","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages 232-234"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agnostic identification of plasma biomarkers 对血浆生物标志物进行不可知论鉴定。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.032
Jianfang Liao MD, Juan Cao MD
{"title":"Agnostic identification of plasma biomarkers","authors":"Jianfang Liao MD,&nbsp;Juan Cao MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Page e49"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141791666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimization of the betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing regimen during pregnancy: a combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach 妊娠期倍他米松和地塞米松用药方案的优化:基于胎盘灌注和妊娠生理药代动力学模型的组合方法
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.012
Joyce E.M. Van Der Heijden MSc , Hedwig Van Hove MSc , Niki M. Van Elst BSc , Petra Van Den Broek BSc , Joris Van Drongelen MD, PhD , Hubertina C.J. Scheepers MD, PhD , Saskia N. De Wildt MD, PhD , Rick Greupink PharmD, PhD

Background

Antenatal betamethasone and dexamethasone are prescribed to women who are at high risk of premature birth to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The current treatment regimens, effective to prevent neonatal RDS, may be suboptimal. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding possible adverse long-term neurological outcomes due to high fetal drug exposures. Data from nonhuman primates and sheep suggest maintaining a fetal plasma concentration above 1 ng/mL for 48 hours to retain efficacy, while avoiding undesirable high fetal plasma levels.

Objective

We aimed to re-evaluate the current betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing strategies to assess estimated fetal exposure and provide new dosing proposals that meet the efficacy target but avoid excessive peak exposures.

Study design

A pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to predict fetal drug exposures. To allow prediction of the extent of betamethasone and dexamethasone exposure in the fetus, placenta perfusion experiments were conducted to determine placental transfer. Placental transfer rates were integrated in the PBPK model to predict fetal exposure and model performance was verified using published maternal and fetal pharmacokinetic data. The verified pregnancy PBPK models were then used to simulate alternative dosing regimens to establish a model-informed dose.

Results

Ex vivo data showed that both drugs extensively cross the placenta. For betamethasone 15.7±1.7% and for dexamethasone 14.4±1.5%, the initial maternal perfusate concentration reached the fetal circulations at the end of the 3-hour perfusion period. Pregnancy PBPK models that include these ex vivo-derived placental transfer rates accurately predicted maternal and fetal exposures resulting from current dosing regimens. The dose simulations suggest that for betamethasone intramuscular, a dose reduction from 2 dosages 11.4 mg, 24 hours apart, to 4 dosages 1.425 mg, 12 hours apart would avoid excessive peak exposures and still meet the fetal response threshold. For dexamethasone, the dose may be reduced from 4 times 6 mg every 12 hours to 8 times 1.5 mg every 6 hours.

Conclusion

A combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy PBPK modeling approach adequately predicted both maternal and fetal drug exposures of 2 antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs). Strikingly, our PBPK simulations suggest that drug doses might be reduced drastically to still meet earlier proposed efficacy targets and minimize peak exposures. We propose the provided model-informed dosing regimens are used to support further discussion on an updated ACS scheme and design of clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness and safety of lower doses.
{"title":"Optimization of the betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing regimen during pregnancy: a combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach","authors":"Joyce E.M. Van Der Heijden MSc ,&nbsp;Hedwig Van Hove MSc ,&nbsp;Niki M. Van Elst BSc ,&nbsp;Petra Van Den Broek BSc ,&nbsp;Joris Van Drongelen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hubertina C.J. Scheepers MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Saskia N. De Wildt MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rick Greupink PharmD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antenatal betamethasone and dexamethasone are prescribed to women who are at high risk of premature birth to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The current treatment regimens, effective to prevent neonatal RDS, may be suboptimal. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding possible adverse long-term neurological outcomes due to high fetal drug exposures. Data from nonhuman primates and sheep suggest maintaining a fetal plasma concentration above 1 ng/mL for 48 hours to retain efficacy, while avoiding undesirable high fetal plasma levels.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to re-evaluate the current betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing strategies to assess estimated fetal exposure and provide new dosing proposals that meet the efficacy target but avoid excessive peak exposures.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to predict fetal drug exposures. To allow prediction of the extent of betamethasone and dexamethasone exposure in the fetus, placenta perfusion experiments were conducted to determine placental transfer. Placental transfer rates were integrated in the PBPK model to predict fetal exposure and model performance was verified using published maternal and fetal pharmacokinetic data. The verified pregnancy PBPK models were then used to simulate alternative dosing regimens to establish a model-informed dose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ex vivo data showed that both drugs extensively cross the placenta. For betamethasone 15.7±1.7% and for dexamethasone 14.4±1.5%, the initial maternal perfusate concentration reached the fetal circulations at the end of the 3-hour perfusion period. Pregnancy PBPK models that include these ex vivo-derived placental transfer rates accurately predicted maternal and fetal exposures resulting from current dosing regimens. The dose simulations suggest that for betamethasone intramuscular, a dose reduction from 2 dosages 11.4 mg, 24 hours apart, to 4 dosages 1.425 mg, 12 hours apart would avoid excessive peak exposures and still meet the fetal response threshold. For dexamethasone, the dose may be reduced from 4 times 6 mg every 12 hours to 8 times 1.5 mg every 6 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy PBPK modeling approach adequately predicted both maternal and fetal drug exposures of 2 antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs). Strikingly, our PBPK simulations suggest that drug doses might be reduced drastically to still meet earlier proposed efficacy targets and minimize peak exposures. We propose the provided model-informed dosing regimens are used to support further discussion on an updated ACS scheme and design of clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness and safety of lower doses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages 228.e1-228.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141040285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of endometrial cancer-related bleeding in virtual visits 在虚拟访问中检测子宫内膜癌相关出血。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.032
Elizabeth J. Suh-Burgmann MD, Holly Finertie MPH, Nickolas Nguyen, Sarah Dolisca MD, Julie A. Schmittdiel PhD
{"title":"Detection of endometrial cancer-related bleeding in virtual visits","authors":"Elizabeth J. Suh-Burgmann MD,&nbsp;Holly Finertie MPH,&nbsp;Nickolas Nguyen,&nbsp;Sarah Dolisca MD,&nbsp;Julie A. Schmittdiel PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages e40-e44"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142556915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blood pressure cutoffs at 11-13 weeks of gestation and risk of preeclampsia 妊娠 11-13 周时的血压临界值与子痫前期的风险。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.032
Laura J. Slade , Argyro Syngelaki PhD , Milly Wilson MWH , Hiten D. Mistry PhD , Ranjit Akolekar MD , Peter von Dadelszen PhD , Kypros H. Nicolaides MD , Laura A. Magee MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>A parallel has been drawn between first-trimester placental vascular maturation and maternal cardiovascular adaptations, including blood pressure. Although 140/90 mm Hg is well-accepted as the threshold for chronic hypertension in the general obstetric population in early pregnancy, a different threshold could apply to stratify the risk of </span>adverse outcomes<span><span>, such as preeclampsia. This could have implications for interventions, such as the threshold for initiation of </span>antihypertensive therapy and the target blood pressure level.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>We evaluated the relationship between various blood pressure cutoffs at 11–13 weeks of gestation and the development of </span>preeclampsia, overall and according to key maternal characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div><span><span><span>This secondary analysis was of data from a prospective nonintervention cohort study of singleton pregnancies delivering at ≥24 weeks, without major anomalies, at 2 United Kingdom maternity hospitals, 2006–2020. Blood pressure at 11–13 weeks of gestation was classified according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association categories (mm Hg) as (1) normal blood pressure (systolic <120 and diastolic <80), (2) </span>elevated blood pressure<span> (systolic ≥120 and diastolic <80), stage 1 hypertension (systolic ≥130 or diastolic 80–89), and stage 2 hypertension (systolic ≥140 or diastolic ≥90). For blood pressure category thresholds and the outcome of preeclampsia, the following were calculated overall and across maternal age, </span></span>body mass index, ethnicity, method of conception, and previous pregnancy history: detection rate, screen-positive rate, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. A </span><em>P</em> value of <.05 was considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>There were 137,458 pregnancies screened at 11–13 weeks of gestation. The population was ethnically diverse, with 15.9% of Black ethnicity, 6.7% of South or East Asian ethnicity, and 2.7% of mixed ethnicity, with the remainder of White ethnicity. Compared with normal blood pressure, stage 2 hypertension was associated with both preterm preeclampsia (0.3% to 4.9%) and term preeclampsia (1.0% to 8.3%). A blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg was good at identifying women at increased risk of preeclampsia overall (positive likelihood ratio, 5.61 [95% confidence interval, 5.14–6.11]) and across maternal characteristics, compared with elevated blood pressure (positive likelihood ratio, 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.63–1.77]) and stage 1 hypertension (positive likelihood ratio, 2.68 [95% confidence interval, 2.58–2.77]). There were 2 exceptions: a blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mm Hg was better for the 2.1% of women with </span>body mass index <18.5 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup><span> (positive likeli
背景:妊娠头三个月胎盘血管成熟与孕产妇心血管适应性(包括血压)之间存在平行关系。虽然 140/90 mmHg 已被公认为妊娠早期普通产科人群中慢性高血压的阈值,但不同的阈值可能适用于不良结局风险分层,如子痫前期。这可能会对干预措施产生影响,如开始降压治疗的阈值和目标血压水平:我们评估了妊娠 11-13 周时的各种血压临界值与子痫前期发生之间的关系,包括总体关系和主要产妇特征:这项二次分析是对一项前瞻性非干预队列研究的数据进行的,研究对象是 2006-2020 年在英国两家妇产医院分娩的≥24 周、无重大异常的单胎妊娠。妊娠 11-13 周时的血压根据美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会的分类(毫米汞柱)分为正常血压"(收缩压 结果):共有 137,458 名孕妇在妊娠 11-13 周时接受了筛查。筛查人群具有种族多样性,其中黑人占 15.9%,南亚或东亚人占 6.7%,混血人占 2.7%,其余为白人。与 "正常血压 "相比,"2 期高血压 "与早产子痫前期(0.3% 至 4.9%)和足月子痫前期(1.0% 至 8.3%)均有关联。与 "血压升高"(正似然比为 1.70,95% CI 为 1.63-1.77)和 "高血压 1 期"(正似然比为 2.68,95% CI 为 2.58-2.77)相比,140/90 mmHg 的血压阈值在总体(正似然比为 5.61,95% CI 为 5.14-6.11)和不同孕产妇特征方面都能很好地识别子痫前期风险增加的妇女。但有两个例外:130/80 mmHg 的血压阈值更适合 2.1% 体重指数为 2 的妇女(正似然比为 5.13,95% CI 为 3.22-8.16),135/85 mmHg 的血压阈值更适合 50.4% 无子痫前期病史的准妈妈(正似然比为 5.24,95% CI 为 4.77-5.77)。没有任何血压阈值低于该阈值时可以保证不会发生子痫前期(所有负似然比均≥0.20):结论:传统的血压阈值 140/90 mmHg 能很好地识别子痫前期风险增加的妇女。体重过轻或无先兆子痫病史的parous妇女可通过较低的阈值更好地识别;但是,如果在此阈值下也进行降压治疗,则有必要进行随机试验,以确定这种方法的益处。无论孕产妇的特征如何,任何血压阈值都不能保证不会发生子痫前期。
{"title":"Blood pressure cutoffs at 11-13 weeks of gestation and risk of preeclampsia","authors":"Laura J. Slade ,&nbsp;Argyro Syngelaki PhD ,&nbsp;Milly Wilson MWH ,&nbsp;Hiten D. Mistry PhD ,&nbsp;Ranjit Akolekar MD ,&nbsp;Peter von Dadelszen PhD ,&nbsp;Kypros H. Nicolaides MD ,&nbsp;Laura A. Magee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.032","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;A parallel has been drawn between first-trimester placental vascular maturation and maternal cardiovascular adaptations, including blood pressure. Although 140/90 mm Hg is well-accepted as the threshold for chronic hypertension in the general obstetric population in early pregnancy, a different threshold could apply to stratify the risk of &lt;/span&gt;adverse outcomes&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, such as preeclampsia. This could have implications for interventions, such as the threshold for initiation of &lt;/span&gt;antihypertensive therapy and the target blood pressure level.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;We evaluated the relationship between various blood pressure cutoffs at 11–13 weeks of gestation and the development of &lt;/span&gt;preeclampsia, overall and according to key maternal characteristics.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;This secondary analysis was of data from a prospective nonintervention cohort study of singleton pregnancies delivering at ≥24 weeks, without major anomalies, at 2 United Kingdom maternity hospitals, 2006–2020. Blood pressure at 11–13 weeks of gestation was classified according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association categories (mm Hg) as (1) normal blood pressure (systolic &lt;120 and diastolic &lt;80), (2) &lt;/span&gt;elevated blood pressure&lt;span&gt; (systolic ≥120 and diastolic &lt;80), stage 1 hypertension (systolic ≥130 or diastolic 80–89), and stage 2 hypertension (systolic ≥140 or diastolic ≥90). For blood pressure category thresholds and the outcome of preeclampsia, the following were calculated overall and across maternal age, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;body mass index, ethnicity, method of conception, and previous pregnancy history: detection rate, screen-positive rate, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. A &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; value of &lt;.05 was considered significant.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;There were 137,458 pregnancies screened at 11–13 weeks of gestation. The population was ethnically diverse, with 15.9% of Black ethnicity, 6.7% of South or East Asian ethnicity, and 2.7% of mixed ethnicity, with the remainder of White ethnicity. Compared with normal blood pressure, stage 2 hypertension was associated with both preterm preeclampsia (0.3% to 4.9%) and term preeclampsia (1.0% to 8.3%). A blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg was good at identifying women at increased risk of preeclampsia overall (positive likelihood ratio, 5.61 [95% confidence interval, 5.14–6.11]) and across maternal characteristics, compared with elevated blood pressure (positive likelihood ratio, 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.63–1.77]) and stage 1 hypertension (positive likelihood ratio, 2.68 [95% confidence interval, 2.58–2.77]). There were 2 exceptions: a blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mm Hg was better for the 2.1% of women with &lt;/span&gt;body mass index &lt;18.5 kg/m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt; (positive likeli","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages 214.e1-214.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140850066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deep learning to predict fetal acidemia: a response 深度学习预测胎儿酸血症:回应。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.037
Jennifer A. McCoy MD, MSCE, William G. La Cava PhD
{"title":"Deep learning to predict fetal acidemia: a response","authors":"Jennifer A. McCoy MD, MSCE,&nbsp;William G. La Cava PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Page e46"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141791669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postpartum depressive symptoms and contraception 产后抑郁症状与避孕。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.019
Brynne Ridgewell BSN, Keisha Callins MD
{"title":"Postpartum depressive symptoms and contraception","authors":"Brynne Ridgewell BSN,&nbsp;Keisha Callins MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Page e47"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External aortic compression: buying time to save lives in obstetric hemorrhage 主动脉外压迫:为挽救产科大出血患者的生命争取时间。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.017
Albaro J. Nieto-Calvache MD , Jose M. Palacios-Jaraquemada MD, PhD , Rozi A. Aryananda MD , Nicolas Basanta MD , Nareswari Cininta MD , Luisa F. Rivera-Torres MD , Esperanza Bautista MD , Ahmed M. Hussein MD
{"title":"External aortic compression: buying time to save lives in obstetric hemorrhage","authors":"Albaro J. Nieto-Calvache MD ,&nbsp;Jose M. Palacios-Jaraquemada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rozi A. Aryananda MD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Basanta MD ,&nbsp;Nareswari Cininta MD ,&nbsp;Luisa F. Rivera-Torres MD ,&nbsp;Esperanza Bautista MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Hussein MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Pages 239-241"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142275297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world evidence for utility of serum angiogenic and antiangiogenic biomarker testing 血清血管生成和抗血管生成生物标志物检测的实际应用证据。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.008
Sarosh Rana MD, MPH, Luke P. Burns MD
{"title":"Real-world evidence for utility of serum angiogenic and antiangiogenic biomarker testing","authors":"Sarosh Rana MD, MPH,&nbsp;Luke P. Burns MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 2","pages":"Page e71"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1