Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003903
Han Zheng, Kang Qiu, Yiyao Xu, Xin Lu, Bao Jin
{"title":"Something Fishy in the Liver-An Unexpected Mass in a Patient With Heavy Alcohol Use.","authors":"Han Zheng, Kang Qiu, Yiyao Xu, Xin Lu, Bao Jin","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003903","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003903","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003911
Jennifer K Maratt, Anneleise Frie, Jennifer M Weiss
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, particularly those of the stomach and colorectum, are among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and worldwide. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene functions as a tumor suppressor gene whose loss of function plays a critical role in GI cancer development. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of the APC gene are associated with intestinal (gastric, small bowel, and colorectal neoplasia) and extra-intestinal manifestations. In this narrative review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of APC gene related polyposis syndromes. We also review the variation in genotype-phenotype presentations and discuss practical aspects of caring for individuals affected by these syndromes with an emphasis on multidisciplinary care, family planning, and transitions of care.
{"title":"Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-related Syndromes.","authors":"Jennifer K Maratt, Anneleise Frie, Jennifer M Weiss","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, particularly those of the stomach and colorectum, are among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and worldwide. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene functions as a tumor suppressor gene whose loss of function plays a critical role in GI cancer development. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of the APC gene are associated with intestinal (gastric, small bowel, and colorectal neoplasia) and extra-intestinal manifestations. In this narrative review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of APC gene related polyposis syndromes. We also review the variation in genotype-phenotype presentations and discuss practical aspects of caring for individuals affected by these syndromes with an emphasis on multidisciplinary care, family planning, and transitions of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: To use a large language model (LLM) to create accurate and useable summaries of patient records for clinicians triaging new hepatology referrals.
Methods: We developed a comprehensive list of data elements required to triage a new hepatology referral and engaged in an iterative prompt engineering process to instruct an LLM to extract relevant data from patient referral documents. The final prompt was used on 50 original patient records from June to July 2025 to generate corresponding artificial intelligence (AI) summaries, which were assigned to 2 providers to review and triage according to their usual process. We assessed time to triage original vs AI files and accuracy of the AI files. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine an adjusted time ratio comparing the time to triage AI files vs original files.
Results: AI-generated summaries were significantly shorter than original files (median [interquartile range] 2 [2-3] vs 23 [10.2-38.8] pages, P < 0.001). AI summaries had high accuracy (median [interquartile range]: 94.6% [86.5%-97.3%]) with a low hallucination rate. Use of the AI summaries led to a 60% reduction in triage time (adjusted mean triage time of 37.2 seconds for AI files vs 94.2 seconds for original files, P < 0.001).
Discussion: The use of an LLM led to significantly reduced document length, maintained an appropriate level of accuracy, and led to a significant decrease in clinician time to review the patient record. Future steps involve creating a fully automated workflow that is integrated into the electronic health record for widespread use.
目的:使用大型语言模型(LLM)来创建准确和可用的患者记录摘要,以便临床医生对新的肝病转诊进行分诊。方法:我们开发了一个全面的数据元素列表,用于对新的肝病转诊进行分类,并参与了一个迭代的快速工程过程,以指导法学硕士从患者转诊文件中提取相关数据。最后的提示用于2025年6月至7月的50份原始患者记录,生成相应的人工智能(AI)摘要,并将其分配给两个提供者,根据他们的常规流程进行审查和分类。我们评估了对原始文件和人工智能文件进行分类的时间以及人工智能文件的准确性。使用线性混合效果模型来确定调整后的时间比,比较人工智能文件与原始文件的分类时间。结果:人工智能生成的摘要明显短于原始文件(中位数[IQR] 2 [2-3] vs. 23[10.2 - 38.8]页)。结论:使用LLM显著缩短了文档长度,保持了适当的准确性,并显著减少了临床医生审查患者记录的时间。未来的步骤包括创建一个完全自动化的工作流,该工作流集成到电子健康记录中以供广泛使用。
{"title":"A Large Language Model Assistant for Summarizing Hepatology Referral Documents.","authors":"Hersh Shroff, Anubhav Shankar, Alison Baron, Lindsay Yoxheimer, Oren K Fix","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003905","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003905","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To use a large language model (LLM) to create accurate and useable summaries of patient records for clinicians triaging new hepatology referrals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a comprehensive list of data elements required to triage a new hepatology referral and engaged in an iterative prompt engineering process to instruct an LLM to extract relevant data from patient referral documents. The final prompt was used on 50 original patient records from June to July 2025 to generate corresponding artificial intelligence (AI) summaries, which were assigned to 2 providers to review and triage according to their usual process. We assessed time to triage original vs AI files and accuracy of the AI files. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine an adjusted time ratio comparing the time to triage AI files vs original files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-generated summaries were significantly shorter than original files (median [interquartile range] 2 [2-3] vs 23 [10.2-38.8] pages, P < 0.001). AI summaries had high accuracy (median [interquartile range]: 94.6% [86.5%-97.3%]) with a low hallucination rate. Use of the AI summaries led to a 60% reduction in triage time (adjusted mean triage time of 37.2 seconds for AI files vs 94.2 seconds for original files, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of an LLM led to significantly reduced document length, maintained an appropriate level of accuracy, and led to a significant decrease in clinician time to review the patient record. Future steps involve creating a fully automated workflow that is integrated into the electronic health record for widespread use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003902
Julian Diaz-Moreno, Sankalp Dwivedi, James Kruer
{"title":"The Appendix as a Diagnostic Blind Spot: A Case of Concealed Tubular Adenoma.","authors":"Julian Diaz-Moreno, Sankalp Dwivedi, James Kruer","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003902","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003902","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-03DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003766
Yunyi Yang, Zheng Yao, Hongjie Yang
{"title":"Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Yunyi Yang, Zheng Yao, Hongjie Yang","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003766","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003766","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e5-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003870
Daphne Moutsoglou
Article Title: Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
文章标题:炎症性肠病妊娠管理的全球共识声明。
{"title":"Continuing Medical Education Questions: January 2026.","authors":"Daphne Moutsoglou","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Article Title: Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"121 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-31DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456
Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani
Introduction: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.
Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model.
Results: Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12-15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1-1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98-19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58-6.17) among BE patients.
Discussion: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.
{"title":"Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.","authors":"Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12-15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1-1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98-19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58-6.17) among BE patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"140-150"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003466
Yannick Hoffert, Zhigang Wang, Mathurin Fumery, Maria Nachury, Maëva Bazoge, Anthony Buisson, Erwin Dreesen
Introduction: A subcutaneous formulation of infliximab was recently approved for maintenance therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, limited clinical experience, particularly with patients on escalated intravenous infliximab regimens, poses challenges for the transition to subcutaneous therapy. We investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous infliximab to identify early predictors of relapse on switching.
Methods: We repurposed data from a prospective, multicenter trial involving patients with IBD switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab. We estimated each patient's infliximab clearance using Bayesian forecasting from a preswitch sample and a population pharmacokinetics model. We performed pharmacodynamics modeling to evaluate preswitch predictors of postswitch relapse. Relapse was defined as clinical recurrence (partial Mayo score >2 or Harvey-Bradshaw Index >4 leading to therapeutic escalation) or an increase in fecal calprotectin ≥150 μg/g on switching.
Results: Using data from 98 patients with IBD, we identified infliximab clearance and fecal calprotectin as independent predictors of relapse. A 2-item risk score stratified patients into the low-risk (<19% probability of relapse; 75/98; 77%) and high-risk (≥19% probability of relapse; 23/98; 23%) groups (sensitivity 0.75 [95% CI 0.48-0.93], specificity 0.87 [95% CI 0.77-0.93] positive predictive value 52% [95% CI 31-73%], negative predictive value 95% [95% CI 87-99%]). Our pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics model classified patients with and without relapse ( P < 0.0001) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.93).
Discussion: Preswitch infliximab clearance and fecal calprotectin are accurate predictors of relapse after switching to subcutaneous infliximab. An interactive risk stratification tool facilitates confirmation of a stratified medicine approach to improve infliximab therapy in IBD.
{"title":"A Risk Stratification Tool for Relapse After Intravenous-To-Subcutaneous Switching of Infliximab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.","authors":"Yannick Hoffert, Zhigang Wang, Mathurin Fumery, Maria Nachury, Maëva Bazoge, Anthony Buisson, Erwin Dreesen","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003466","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A subcutaneous formulation of infliximab was recently approved for maintenance therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, limited clinical experience, particularly with patients on escalated intravenous infliximab regimens, poses challenges for the transition to subcutaneous therapy. We investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous infliximab to identify early predictors of relapse on switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We repurposed data from a prospective, multicenter trial involving patients with IBD switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab. We estimated each patient's infliximab clearance using Bayesian forecasting from a preswitch sample and a population pharmacokinetics model. We performed pharmacodynamics modeling to evaluate preswitch predictors of postswitch relapse. Relapse was defined as clinical recurrence (partial Mayo score >2 or Harvey-Bradshaw Index >4 leading to therapeutic escalation) or an increase in fecal calprotectin ≥150 μg/g on switching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using data from 98 patients with IBD, we identified infliximab clearance and fecal calprotectin as independent predictors of relapse. A 2-item risk score stratified patients into the low-risk (<19% probability of relapse; 75/98; 77%) and high-risk (≥19% probability of relapse; 23/98; 23%) groups (sensitivity 0.75 [95% CI 0.48-0.93], specificity 0.87 [95% CI 0.77-0.93] positive predictive value 52% [95% CI 31-73%], negative predictive value 95% [95% CI 87-99%]). Our pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics model classified patients with and without relapse ( P < 0.0001) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.93).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preswitch infliximab clearance and fecal calprotectin are accurate predictors of relapse after switching to subcutaneous infliximab. An interactive risk stratification tool facilitates confirmation of a stratified medicine approach to improve infliximab therapy in IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are an adverse outcome associated with missed lesions and incomplete polypectomy. However, their molecular features have not been systematically reviewed.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2024. Studies examining the molecular characteristics of PCCRCs, including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP), genetic mutations, and chromosomal alterations were regarded as eligible.
Results: In total, 15 studies encompassing 11 cohorts, with 2,143 PCCRC and 19,036 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) cases, were analyzed. Compared with SCRC, PCCRC was associated with older age (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.38) and more proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63). Molecularly, PCCRCs were more likely to exhibit MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08), CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18), and BRAF mutations (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49) but were less likely to exhibit KRAS mutations (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87). Furthermore, MSI was strongly correlated with BRAF mutation (OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16) and proximal lesions (OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16) in a pooled analysis. Although the pooled 5-year overall survival rate was similar between PCCRC and SCRC cases (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66), PCCRCs exhibited worse survival compared with screening-detected ones (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.46-1.86).
Discussion: Clinical and molecular features indicate that PCCRCs are more likely to be associated with the serrated pathway than with SCRC. Enhancing the detection of clinically significant serrated lesions may improve the efficacy of CRC screening.
结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRCs)是一种与遗漏病变和不完全息肉切除术相关的不良结果。然而,它们的分子特征尚未得到系统的评述。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从成立到2024年4月。研究PCCRCs的分子特征,包括微卫星不稳定性(MSI)、CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)、基因突变和染色体改变被认为是合格的。结果:共分析了15项研究,包括11个队列,2143例PCCRC和19036例散发性结直肠癌(SCRC)病例。与SCRC相比,PCCRC与年龄较大(标准化平均差0.29,95%可信区间[CI] 0.20-0.38)和近端病变较多相关(优势比[OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63)。从分子上看,pccrc更容易表现出MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08)、CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18)和BRAF突变(OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49),但较少表现出KRAS突变(OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87)。此外,在合并分析中,MSI与BRAF突变(OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16)和近端病变(OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16)密切相关。尽管PCCRC和SCRC病例的5年总生存率相似(风险比1.03,95% CI 0.64-1.66),但PCCRC患者的生存率较筛查检测患者差(风险比1.65,95% CI 1.46-1.86)。结论:临床和分子特征表明pccrc更可能与锯齿状通路相关,而不是与SCRC相关。加强对具有临床意义的锯齿状病变的检测,可以提高CRC筛查的效果。
{"title":"Predominant Serrated Molecular Signature in Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jen-Hao Yeh, Sin-Hua Moi, Chia-Chi Chen, Chao-Wen Hsu, Wen-Shuo Yeh, Tzu-Ning Tseng, Chuan-Pin Lin, Yu-Peng Liu, Jaw-Yuan Wang","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003658","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003658","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are an adverse outcome associated with missed lesions and incomplete polypectomy. However, their molecular features have not been systematically reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2024. Studies examining the molecular characteristics of PCCRCs, including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP), genetic mutations, and chromosomal alterations were regarded as eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies encompassing 11 cohorts, with 2,143 PCCRC and 19,036 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) cases, were analyzed. Compared with SCRC, PCCRC was associated with older age (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.38) and more proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63). Molecularly, PCCRCs were more likely to exhibit MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08), CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18), and BRAF mutations (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49) but were less likely to exhibit KRAS mutations (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87). Furthermore, MSI was strongly correlated with BRAF mutation (OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16) and proximal lesions (OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16) in a pooled analysis. Although the pooled 5-year overall survival rate was similar between PCCRC and SCRC cases (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66), PCCRCs exhibited worse survival compared with screening-detected ones (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.46-1.86).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical and molecular features indicate that PCCRCs are more likely to be associated with the serrated pathway than with SCRC. Enhancing the detection of clinically significant serrated lesions may improve the efficacy of CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"122-129"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12746767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144688648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003669
Amitabh Chak, Komal Keerthy, Gi-Ming Wang, Wendy Brock, Beth Bednarchik, Rajesh Guptha, Suman Verma, Helen Moinova, Curtis Tatsuoka, John Dumot, Sapna Thomas, Joseph E Willis, Sanford Markowitz
Introduction: Upper endoscopy (EGD) is generally recommended in those with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To evaluate nonendoscopic screening in those without GERD symptoms.
Methods: EsoCheck/Esoguard (LucidDx) was performed in recruited patients without chronic GERD who had ≥3 other BE risk factors.
Results: The EsoGuard assay was positive in 34 of 120 patients. BE was identified in 9 of 27 who had follow-up EGD, positive predictive value = 33% (17%-54%). EGD performed in 22 of 86 subjects with negative assays found no BE, negative predictive value = 100% (85%-100%).
Discussion: Nonendoscopic BE detection is effective in patients without chronic GERD.
{"title":"Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus on Patients Without Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms.","authors":"Amitabh Chak, Komal Keerthy, Gi-Ming Wang, Wendy Brock, Beth Bednarchik, Rajesh Guptha, Suman Verma, Helen Moinova, Curtis Tatsuoka, John Dumot, Sapna Thomas, Joseph E Willis, Sanford Markowitz","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003669","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper endoscopy (EGD) is generally recommended in those with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To evaluate nonendoscopic screening in those without GERD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EsoCheck/Esoguard (LucidDx) was performed in recruited patients without chronic GERD who had ≥3 other BE risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EsoGuard assay was positive in 34 of 120 patients. BE was identified in 9 of 27 who had follow-up EGD, positive predictive value = 33% (17%-54%). EGD performed in 22 of 86 subjects with negative assays found no BE, negative predictive value = 100% (85%-100%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nonendoscopic BE detection is effective in patients without chronic GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"258-261"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144758959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}