Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-31DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003451
Ahmed Telbany, Abhishek Patel, Pooja Viswanath, Evelyn Inga, Swathi Paleti
Introduction: The liver supplement market is rapidly expanding, yet the efficacy and safety of these products remain largely unsubstantiated. The aim of this study was to analyze the best-selling liver "cleansing" supplements on Amazon, the leading online retailer in the United States.
Methods: We identified the top 20 liver cleanse supplements on Amazon using specific search criteria. Product composition, marketing claims, customer reviews, sales data, and revenue were analyzed. AMZScout was used for sales analytics and FakeSpot for review authenticity assessment. The most common ingredients were identified, and their scientific evidence evaluated through structured PubMed searches with predefined criteria for evidence quality assessment.
Results: The 20 top-selling supplements generated total annual sales of 1,420,584 units with a revenue of $38,783,937. All products claimed to "eliminate toxins" or provide "liver detox/cleanse," whereas 85% claimed to "enhance liver function." The average product rating was 4.4 of 5 stars, with review reliability averaging 73% ± 20%. Milk thistle was the most common ingredient (19/20 products), followed by dandelion and turmeric root (13/20 each). Scientific evidence supporting these ingredients' efficacy in liver health was limited and inconclusive.
Discussion: This study reveals a thriving market for liver supplements, despite limited scientific evidence supporting their efficacy. The prevalence of bold health claims, high consumer satisfaction, and significant sales highlight the need for more rigorous evaluation and regulation of these products. Healthcare providers should be aware of these trends to better counsel patients on evidence-based approaches to liver health.
{"title":"Liver Cleansing Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Liver Supplements.","authors":"Ahmed Telbany, Abhishek Patel, Pooja Viswanath, Evelyn Inga, Swathi Paleti","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003451","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The liver supplement market is rapidly expanding, yet the efficacy and safety of these products remain largely unsubstantiated. The aim of this study was to analyze the best-selling liver \"cleansing\" supplements on Amazon, the leading online retailer in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified the top 20 liver cleanse supplements on Amazon using specific search criteria. Product composition, marketing claims, customer reviews, sales data, and revenue were analyzed. AMZScout was used for sales analytics and FakeSpot for review authenticity assessment. The most common ingredients were identified, and their scientific evidence evaluated through structured PubMed searches with predefined criteria for evidence quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 20 top-selling supplements generated total annual sales of 1,420,584 units with a revenue of $38,783,937. All products claimed to \"eliminate toxins\" or provide \"liver detox/cleanse,\" whereas 85% claimed to \"enhance liver function.\" The average product rating was 4.4 of 5 stars, with review reliability averaging 73% ± 20%. Milk thistle was the most common ingredient (19/20 products), followed by dandelion and turmeric root (13/20 each). Scientific evidence supporting these ingredients' efficacy in liver health was limited and inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study reveals a thriving market for liver supplements, despite limited scientific evidence supporting their efficacy. The prevalence of bold health claims, high consumer satisfaction, and significant sales highlight the need for more rigorous evaluation and regulation of these products. Healthcare providers should be aware of these trends to better counsel patients on evidence-based approaches to liver health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-03DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003754
Chengrun Xu, Weiwei Hu, Jie Chen
{"title":"Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Chengrun Xu, Weiwei Hu, Jie Chen","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003754","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003754","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003763
Linda Jiang, Keming Yang, Ravy K Vajravelu, Robert E Schoen
{"title":"Response to Limburg.","authors":"Linda Jiang, Keming Yang, Ravy K Vajravelu, Robert E Schoen","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003763","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003763","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e3-e4"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145666664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: To evaluate the risks of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in older adult patients, given the increasing number of ESD in an aging population.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese nationwide database from 2012 to 2023. Patients aged 60 years or older who underwent colorectal ESD were included. The primary outcome was overall adverse events (AEs), including in-hospital mortality, procedure-related perforation, abdominal surgery, aspiration pneumonia, and significant postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic events. We first examined the association between age and AEs using multivariable regression adjusting for patient characteristics. Next, to explore the factors associated with overall AEs in those aged 85 years or older, we fit a multivariable logistic regression.
Results: The study included 143,925 cases. Age distribution was as follows: 60-64 (13.5%), 65-74 (44.9%), 75-84 (35.8%), and ≥85 (5.8%) years. The prevalence of overall AEs increased with age: 5.3% for ages 60-64 years, 7.9% for ages 85-89 years, and 9.2% for ages 90 years or older. Patients aged 85 years or older had a higher prevalence of overall AEs compared with patients aged 60-64 years, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33, P < 0.01) for those aged 85-89 years and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.80, P < 0.01) for those aged 90 years or older. Most AEs in patients aged 85 years or older were due to significant postoperative bleeding, with anticoagulant use and body mass index ≥30 identified as key risk factors.
Discussion: The risks of AEs during colorectal ESD increase with age, particularly in patients aged 85 years or older.
目的:考虑到老年人群中结肠内镜下粘膜下夹层(ESD)的数量不断增加,评估老年患者结肠内镜下粘膜下夹层的风险。方法:我们利用2012年至2023年日本全国数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。年龄≥60岁且行结肠直肠ESD的患者纳入研究。主要结局是总体不良事件(ae),包括住院死亡率、手术相关穿孔、腹部手术、吸入性肺炎以及术后显著出血和血栓栓塞事件。我们首先通过对患者特征进行多变量回归调整,检验了年龄与ae之间的关系。接下来,我们拟合了多变量logistic回归,以探讨与≥85岁患者总体ae相关的因素。结果:纳入143925例病例。年龄分布:60 ~ 64岁(13.5%)、65 ~ 74岁(44.9%)、75 ~ 84岁(35.8%)、≥85岁(5.8%)。总体不良事件发生率随年龄增长而增加:60-64岁5.3%,85-89岁7.9%,≥90岁9.2%。与60-64岁的患者相比,≥85岁的患者总体不良事件发生率较高,85-89岁患者的调整优势比(aOR)为1.19(95%可信区间[CI]: 1.07-1.33, p < 0.01),≥90岁患者的调整优势比(aOR)为1.45 (95% CI: 1.16-1.80, p < 0.01)。≥85岁患者的ae主要是由于术后出血,使用抗凝剂和体重指数≥30是主要危险因素。结论:结直肠ESD患者发生不良事件的风险随着年龄的增长而增加,尤其是年龄≥85岁的患者。
{"title":"Risk of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Older Adults: A Nationwide Study in Japan.","authors":"Chikamasa Ichita, Tadahiro Goto, Akiko Sasaki, Kiyohide Fushimi, Sayuri Shimizu","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003447","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the risks of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in older adult patients, given the increasing number of ESD in an aging population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese nationwide database from 2012 to 2023. Patients aged 60 years or older who underwent colorectal ESD were included. The primary outcome was overall adverse events (AEs), including in-hospital mortality, procedure-related perforation, abdominal surgery, aspiration pneumonia, and significant postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic events. We first examined the association between age and AEs using multivariable regression adjusting for patient characteristics. Next, to explore the factors associated with overall AEs in those aged 85 years or older, we fit a multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 143,925 cases. Age distribution was as follows: 60-64 (13.5%), 65-74 (44.9%), 75-84 (35.8%), and ≥85 (5.8%) years. The prevalence of overall AEs increased with age: 5.3% for ages 60-64 years, 7.9% for ages 85-89 years, and 9.2% for ages 90 years or older. Patients aged 85 years or older had a higher prevalence of overall AEs compared with patients aged 60-64 years, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33, P < 0.01) for those aged 85-89 years and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.80, P < 0.01) for those aged 90 years or older. Most AEs in patients aged 85 years or older were due to significant postoperative bleeding, with anticoagulant use and body mass index ≥30 identified as key risk factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The risks of AEs during colorectal ESD increase with age, particularly in patients aged 85 years or older.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"222-232"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003825
Michelle A Anderson, Gregory A Cote, Rajesh N Keswani, Sarah A Rodriguez, Uzma D Siddiqui, B Joseph Elmunzer
{"title":"Quality Indicators for ERCP.","authors":"Michelle A Anderson, Gregory A Cote, Rajesh N Keswani, Sarah A Rodriguez, Uzma D Siddiqui, B Joseph Elmunzer","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003825","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003825","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"80-95"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145766904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Postendoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) bleeding presents challenges for endoscopists using side-viewing duodenoscopes. Recently, polysaccharide hemostatic powder (PHP) has shown promising results in managing gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Given the established efficacy of endoscopic clips in addressing post-EST bleeding, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of PHP and its noninferiority to endoscopic clips in patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding.
Methods: Patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding were randomized to receive either PHP or endoscopic clips. The primary end point was the immediate hemostasis rate, with secondary end points including delayed bleeding rate, overall treatment success rate, mean hemostasis time, and other major complications.
Results: A total of 104 patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding were included. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the PHP group and 92.3% in the endoscopic clip group (risk difference, 7.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5%-15.0%, P = 0.022). Four patients in the endoscopic clip group experienced immediate hemostasis failure. Hemostasis time was shorter in the PHP group (50.77 vs 62.81 seconds, P = 0.011). One delayed bleeding case (2.1%) occurred in the clip group, whereas none were observed in the PHP group. The overall treatment success rate was higher in the PHP group compared with the endoscopic clip group (100% vs 90.4%; P = 0.022). No differences were observed in adverse events.
Discussion: PHP is not inferior to endoscopic clip and could be of use in immediate hemostasis for nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding, with the added advantage of ease of use. Further research is needed to assess its efficacy in preventing delayed bleeding ( chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2400092280).
{"title":"Efficacy of Polysaccharide Hemostatic Powder on Blood Oozing Among Patients With Postendoscopic Sphincterotomy Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hengcun Li, Jiaxuan Zuo, Wenhai Wang, Shanshan Wu, Yu Zhao, Yongqiu Wei, Jiugang Song, Zheng Zhang, Weilong Yao, Junxiong Wang, Chuntao Liu, Hongtao Wei, Zheng Liang, Xiaohan Yang, Kaiqi Yang, Fujing Lv, Yongjun Wang, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003468","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postendoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) bleeding presents challenges for endoscopists using side-viewing duodenoscopes. Recently, polysaccharide hemostatic powder (PHP) has shown promising results in managing gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Given the established efficacy of endoscopic clips in addressing post-EST bleeding, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of PHP and its noninferiority to endoscopic clips in patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding were randomized to receive either PHP or endoscopic clips. The primary end point was the immediate hemostasis rate, with secondary end points including delayed bleeding rate, overall treatment success rate, mean hemostasis time, and other major complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients with nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding were included. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the PHP group and 92.3% in the endoscopic clip group (risk difference, 7.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5%-15.0%, P = 0.022). Four patients in the endoscopic clip group experienced immediate hemostasis failure. Hemostasis time was shorter in the PHP group (50.77 vs 62.81 seconds, P = 0.011). One delayed bleeding case (2.1%) occurred in the clip group, whereas none were observed in the PHP group. The overall treatment success rate was higher in the PHP group compared with the endoscopic clip group (100% vs 90.4%; P = 0.022). No differences were observed in adverse events.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PHP is not inferior to endoscopic clip and could be of use in immediate hemostasis for nonpulsatile post-EST bleeding, with the added advantage of ease of use. Further research is needed to assess its efficacy in preventing delayed bleeding ( chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2400092280).</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"233-241"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12746778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003827
{"title":"Calendar of Courses, Symposiums and Conferences.","authors":"","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003827","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"121 1","pages":"277"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003742
Russell Yanofsky, Benjamin D McDonald, Newsha Nikzad, David Choi, Christopher R Shea, Angad A Chadha, David T Rubin
Introduction: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are small-molecule therapies used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We describe 8 patients with IBD who developed an eczematous eruption, presumed atopic dermatitis (AD), after stopping JAKi therapy.
Methods: This case series describes 8 patients with IBD who developed de novo AD after withdrawal of JAKi therapy.
Results: Median time to AD onset was 7 days (interquartile range 2-12). Two cases with biopsy-confirmed AD resolved after reinitiation of JAKi therapy and adjunct AD treatments.
Discussion: A subset of patients with IBD may have latent susceptibility to AD, unmasked by therapy cessation and potentially triggered by an immune rebound effect.
{"title":"New Eczematous Eruption in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Who Stop Janus Kinase Inhibitors.","authors":"Russell Yanofsky, Benjamin D McDonald, Newsha Nikzad, David Choi, Christopher R Shea, Angad A Chadha, David T Rubin","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003742","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are small-molecule therapies used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We describe 8 patients with IBD who developed an eczematous eruption, presumed atopic dermatitis (AD), after stopping JAKi therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series describes 8 patients with IBD who developed de novo AD after withdrawal of JAKi therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time to AD onset was 7 days (interquartile range 2-12). Two cases with biopsy-confirmed AD resolved after reinitiation of JAKi therapy and adjunct AD treatments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A subset of patients with IBD may have latent susceptibility to AD, unmasked by therapy cessation and potentially triggered by an immune rebound effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144938995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}