Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae178.281
Megan Alcock, Mary Hayes, Catherine O'Sullivan, Kieran O'Connor
Background Our current healthcare systems are designed around periods of acute illness and are ill equipped to meet the needs of multimorbid and frail adults with worsening mobility, cognition and function. According to The Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA), Ireland has a high proportion of hospital deaths, indicating inadequate community and home care supports. Recognizing patients who are likely to benefit from supportive and palliative approaches with a goal to die at home can be done using a combination of tools and based on advanced care planning discussions. Methods In 2021, our Department for Older Persons Services allocated a team consisting of a Registrar and Advanced Nurse Practitioner in Frailty to form an outreach service. Inpatients who appear nearing end of life who have expressed wishes to avoid further hospitalization and to die at home are identified during their admission. Home visits allow for a holistic assessment and family members are given the opportunity to ask questions. We provide education on end of life, trying to anticipate needs and often see patients and families through periods of deterioration until they stabilize again in a ‘new normal’ or begin the process of active dying. We communicate with Public Health Nurses, General Practitioners and the Community Palliative Care Team. Results Families and carers supporting loved ones who wish to avoid further hospitalization and die at home benefit from combined medical and nursing support & specialist expertise the team brings. Conclusion Addressing end of life for multimorbid patients living with severe frailty is a global challenge. Hospital admission is an ideal time to begin conversations regarding goals of care and initiate advanced care planning. The outreach team work together with hospital and community colleagues to the common goal of following patients’ wishes at end of life.
{"title":"Managing End of Life Needs of Frail, Older Adults in the Community: The Role of a Hospital-Based Community Outreach Team","authors":"Megan Alcock, Mary Hayes, Catherine O'Sullivan, Kieran O'Connor","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.281","url":null,"abstract":"Background Our current healthcare systems are designed around periods of acute illness and are ill equipped to meet the needs of multimorbid and frail adults with worsening mobility, cognition and function. According to The Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA), Ireland has a high proportion of hospital deaths, indicating inadequate community and home care supports. Recognizing patients who are likely to benefit from supportive and palliative approaches with a goal to die at home can be done using a combination of tools and based on advanced care planning discussions. Methods In 2021, our Department for Older Persons Services allocated a team consisting of a Registrar and Advanced Nurse Practitioner in Frailty to form an outreach service. Inpatients who appear nearing end of life who have expressed wishes to avoid further hospitalization and to die at home are identified during their admission. Home visits allow for a holistic assessment and family members are given the opportunity to ask questions. We provide education on end of life, trying to anticipate needs and often see patients and families through periods of deterioration until they stabilize again in a ‘new normal’ or begin the process of active dying. We communicate with Public Health Nurses, General Practitioners and the Community Palliative Care Team. Results Families and carers supporting loved ones who wish to avoid further hospitalization and die at home benefit from combined medical and nursing support & specialist expertise the team brings. Conclusion Addressing end of life for multimorbid patients living with severe frailty is a global challenge. Hospital admission is an ideal time to begin conversations regarding goals of care and initiate advanced care planning. The outreach team work together with hospital and community colleagues to the common goal of following patients’ wishes at end of life.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142360114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae178.278
Eleanor Marks, Sophie Buckley, Orlaith O'Connell, Claire O'Brien, Mary Buckley
Background Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders and Treatment Escalation Plans (TEPs) are key components of advanced care planning for managing patients with progressive life-limiting illnesses and significant frailty. Our study aimed to determine the proportion of such patients being transferred from residential care facilities with documented TEPs upon medical admission, examine whether these TEPs were revised during the hospital stay, and assess patient outcomes at 14 days post-presentation. Methods We reviewed the lists of patients who had been referred for medical admission via the emergency department over a one-month period and identified those presenting from residential care facilities. We excluded those under the age of 65. We reviewed relevant medical notes and collected anonymised data into an Excel spreadsheet on a password protected computer. Results We identified 34 patient’s relevant patients. Notes were available for review in 31 cases (17 male; age range 66 to 96 years old, mean age 82.3). Of the 31 cases reviewed, the mean Clinical Frailty Score was 7.4. Residential care facilities sent documentation outlining TEPs in 19/31 cases. In those cases, 4/19 specified full resuscitation. In 3/4 of these cases, the TEP was revised during their admission. In one case, documentation specified that the patient did not want to be transferred to hospital under any circumstances. A total of 14 patients had no documentation regarding TEP. Of those, 7/14 went on to have DNA CPR orders filled out during their admission. At 14 days post presentation, 7 had died in hospital, 16 were discharged back to their residential care facility, and the remainder remained inpatient. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for better advance care planning, potentially improving patient management and reducing the emotional burden on patients, healthcare providers and families during critical moments.
{"title":"Improving Advanced Care Planning: Documentation of DNA CPR Orders and TEPs in Residential Care Admissions","authors":"Eleanor Marks, Sophie Buckley, Orlaith O'Connell, Claire O'Brien, Mary Buckley","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.278","url":null,"abstract":"Background Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders and Treatment Escalation Plans (TEPs) are key components of advanced care planning for managing patients with progressive life-limiting illnesses and significant frailty. Our study aimed to determine the proportion of such patients being transferred from residential care facilities with documented TEPs upon medical admission, examine whether these TEPs were revised during the hospital stay, and assess patient outcomes at 14 days post-presentation. Methods We reviewed the lists of patients who had been referred for medical admission via the emergency department over a one-month period and identified those presenting from residential care facilities. We excluded those under the age of 65. We reviewed relevant medical notes and collected anonymised data into an Excel spreadsheet on a password protected computer. Results We identified 34 patient’s relevant patients. Notes were available for review in 31 cases (17 male; age range 66 to 96 years old, mean age 82.3). Of the 31 cases reviewed, the mean Clinical Frailty Score was 7.4. Residential care facilities sent documentation outlining TEPs in 19/31 cases. In those cases, 4/19 specified full resuscitation. In 3/4 of these cases, the TEP was revised during their admission. In one case, documentation specified that the patient did not want to be transferred to hospital under any circumstances. A total of 14 patients had no documentation regarding TEP. Of those, 7/14 went on to have DNA CPR orders filled out during their admission. At 14 days post presentation, 7 had died in hospital, 16 were discharged back to their residential care facility, and the remainder remained inpatient. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for better advance care planning, potentially improving patient management and reducing the emotional burden on patients, healthcare providers and families during critical moments.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142360112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae178.117
Lorna King, Catherine Devaney, Karen Sayers, Christina Donnellan
Background Health care professionals (HCPs) working with older persons are often asked nutrition related questions. This study explored how first line nutrition information such as general leaflets are accessed and used by HCPs and older persons. Is there a role for video-based nutrition education? Methods HCPs working with older persons completed an online survey. An older person’s reference group participated in a virtual focus group. Participants were asked about knowledge seeking, accessing and providing nutrition information, and engaging with videos on nutrition topics. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Ninety five HCPs completed the survey (44% Nursing, 27% Physiotherapy, 14% Occupational Therapy, 6% Speech & Language Therapy and 9% other (doctors, social worker, pharmacist and care needs facilitator).Eighty-eight (90%) HCPs reported being asked nutrition related questions, topics included poor appetite (n=77, 83%), weight loss (n=68, 75%) and constipation (n=66, 72%).Twenty HCPs (21%) reported confidence answering questions, while 28 (29%) reported low confidence. Forty-three (44%) had little or no awareness of available first line information and 37 (39%) rarely or never provided information. Eighty-two (86%) HCPs agreed that nutrition education videos would be used if available. Three themes emerged from the HCPs survey: (i) importance of nutrition for HCPs (ii) barriers to use of first line information and (iii) support systems. Fourteen persons (64% women, 36% men) attended the focus group. Two themes were identified: (i) access to health information and (ii) barriers to access. Discussions included difficulty in proactively seeking information, joined up sharing and that education videos would be beneficial, but the distribution needed consideration. Conclusion Timely access to information is empowering for the older person. HCPs were identified as a resource for seeking nutrition advice. The communication of and access to nutrition information merits consideration. Following these findings, nutrition videos are currently being developed.
{"title":"Engaging with First Line Nutrition Information - Insights from Health Care Professionals and Older Persons","authors":"Lorna King, Catherine Devaney, Karen Sayers, Christina Donnellan","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.117","url":null,"abstract":"Background Health care professionals (HCPs) working with older persons are often asked nutrition related questions. This study explored how first line nutrition information such as general leaflets are accessed and used by HCPs and older persons. Is there a role for video-based nutrition education? Methods HCPs working with older persons completed an online survey. An older person’s reference group participated in a virtual focus group. Participants were asked about knowledge seeking, accessing and providing nutrition information, and engaging with videos on nutrition topics. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Ninety five HCPs completed the survey (44% Nursing, 27% Physiotherapy, 14% Occupational Therapy, 6% Speech & Language Therapy and 9% other (doctors, social worker, pharmacist and care needs facilitator).Eighty-eight (90%) HCPs reported being asked nutrition related questions, topics included poor appetite (n=77, 83%), weight loss (n=68, 75%) and constipation (n=66, 72%).Twenty HCPs (21%) reported confidence answering questions, while 28 (29%) reported low confidence. Forty-three (44%) had little or no awareness of available first line information and 37 (39%) rarely or never provided information. Eighty-two (86%) HCPs agreed that nutrition education videos would be used if available. Three themes emerged from the HCPs survey: (i) importance of nutrition for HCPs (ii) barriers to use of first line information and (iii) support systems. Fourteen persons (64% women, 36% men) attended the focus group. Two themes were identified: (i) access to health information and (ii) barriers to access. Discussions included difficulty in proactively seeking information, joined up sharing and that education videos would be beneficial, but the distribution needed consideration. Conclusion Timely access to information is empowering for the older person. HCPs were identified as a resource for seeking nutrition advice. The communication of and access to nutrition information merits consideration. Following these findings, nutrition videos are currently being developed.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142360279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bronwen E Warner, Mary Wells, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Stephen J Brett
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly expected in healthcare systems prioritising patient autonomy. Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) outline contingency for medical intervention in the event of patient deterioration. This study aimed to understand clinicians’ perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting. Methods This was a qualitative study following a constructivist approach. Semistructured interviews with vignettes were conducted with 26 consultant and registrar doctors working in emergency medicine, general internal medicine, intensive care medicine and palliative care medicine. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed. Results There were three themes: ‘An unequal partnership’, ‘Options without equipoise’ and ‘Decisions with shared understanding’. Clinicians’ expertise in synthesising complex, uncertain clinical information was contrasted with perceived patient unfamiliarity with future health planning and medical intervention. There was a strong sense of morality underpinning decision-making and little equipoise about appropriate TEP decisions. Communication around the TEP was important, and clinicians sought control over the high-stakes decision whilst avoiding conflict and achieving shared understanding. Conclusions Clinicians take responsibility for securing a ‘good’ TEP decision for older patients in the acute medical setting. They synthesise clinical data with implicit ethical reasoning according to their professional predictions of qualitative and quantitative success following medical intervention. SDM is seldom considered a priority for this context. Nonetheless, avoidance of conflict, preserving the clinical relationship and shared understanding with the patient and family are important.
{"title":"Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians’ perspectives (STREAMS-C)","authors":"Bronwen E Warner, Mary Wells, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Stephen J Brett","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae204","url":null,"abstract":"Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly expected in healthcare systems prioritising patient autonomy. Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) outline contingency for medical intervention in the event of patient deterioration. This study aimed to understand clinicians’ perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting. Methods This was a qualitative study following a constructivist approach. Semistructured interviews with vignettes were conducted with 26 consultant and registrar doctors working in emergency medicine, general internal medicine, intensive care medicine and palliative care medicine. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed. Results There were three themes: ‘An unequal partnership’, ‘Options without equipoise’ and ‘Decisions with shared understanding’. Clinicians’ expertise in synthesising complex, uncertain clinical information was contrasted with perceived patient unfamiliarity with future health planning and medical intervention. There was a strong sense of morality underpinning decision-making and little equipoise about appropriate TEP decisions. Communication around the TEP was important, and clinicians sought control over the high-stakes decision whilst avoiding conflict and achieving shared understanding. Conclusions Clinicians take responsibility for securing a ‘good’ TEP decision for older patients in the acute medical setting. They synthesise clinical data with implicit ethical reasoning according to their professional predictions of qualitative and quantitative success following medical intervention. SDM is seldom considered a priority for this context. Nonetheless, avoidance of conflict, preserving the clinical relationship and shared understanding with the patient and family are important.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142325346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The UK is launching a new free vaccination programme against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults aged 75 or over. This follows the development of safe and effective vaccines against RSV and the growing realisation of the burden of RSV-related disease in older adults—estimated at circa 8000 deaths and 175 000 GP episodes every year in the UK. It is likely that the full burden of RSV-related illness is under-appreciated and under-reported due to a lack of testing and awareness of its dangers in older adults. Healthcare professionals working with older people should be aware of the evidence base and be in a position to advise patients on the risks and benefits of vaccination and nonvaccination. We briefly review the evidence for the safety and effectiveness of the two licensed vaccines against RSV with a special focus on what geriatricians and others working with frailer, older people need to know.
{"title":"Why the UK is vaccinating its older adult population against RSV—what geriatricians should know","authors":"Johnny Naylor, Antonia Ho, Roy L Soiza","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae202","url":null,"abstract":"The UK is launching a new free vaccination programme against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults aged 75 or over. This follows the development of safe and effective vaccines against RSV and the growing realisation of the burden of RSV-related disease in older adults—estimated at circa 8000 deaths and 175 000 GP episodes every year in the UK. It is likely that the full burden of RSV-related illness is under-appreciated and under-reported due to a lack of testing and awareness of its dangers in older adults. Healthcare professionals working with older people should be aware of the evidence base and be in a position to advise patients on the risks and benefits of vaccination and nonvaccination. We briefly review the evidence for the safety and effectiveness of the two licensed vaccines against RSV with a special focus on what geriatricians and others working with frailer, older people need to know.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142317593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Domenico Azzolino, Rachele Piras, Aida Zulueta, Tiziano Lucchi, Christian Lunetta
Sarcopenia, the progressive decline of muscle mass and function, has traditionally been viewed as an age-related process leading to a broad range of adverse outcomes. However, it has been widely reported that sarcopenia can occur earlier in life in association with various conditions (i.e. disease-related sarcopenia), including neuromuscular disorders. As early as 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People included neurodegenerative diseases characterised by motor neuron loss among the mechanisms underlying sarcopenia. Despite some differences in pathogenetic mechanisms, both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and age-related sarcopenia share common characteristics, such as the loss of motor units and muscle fibre atrophy, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation. The histology of older muscle shows fibre size heterogeneity, fibre grouping and a loss of satellite cells, similar to what is observed in ALS patients. Regrettably, the sarcopenic process in ALS patients has been largely overlooked, and literature on the condition in this patient group is very scarce. Some instruments used for the assessment of sarcopenia in older people could also be applied to ALS patients. At this time, there is no approved specific pharmacological treatment to reverse damage to motor neurons or cure ALS, just as there is none for sarcopenia. However, some agents targeting the muscle, like myostatin and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, are under investigation both in the sarcopenia and ALS context. The development of new therapeutic agents targeting the skeletal muscle may indeed be beneficial to both ALS patients and older people with sarcopenia.
肌肉疏松症是指肌肉质量和功能的逐渐下降，传统上被认为是一种与年龄相关的过程，会导致一系列不良后果。然而，有广泛报道称，肌肉疏松症可能在生命早期因各种疾病（即与疾病相关的肌肉疏松症）而发生，其中包括神经肌肉疾病。早在 2010 年，欧洲老年人肌肉疏松症工作组就将以运动神经元缺失为特征的神经退行性疾病纳入了肌肉疏松症的发病机制。肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症（ALS）和老年性肌肉疏松症尽管在发病机制上存在一些差异，但两者都有共同的特点，如运动单位丧失、肌肉纤维萎缩、氧化应激、线粒体功能障碍和炎症。老年肌肉的组织学表现为纤维大小不均、纤维分组和卫星细胞丧失，这与渐冻症患者的情况类似。遗憾的是，肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者的肌肉松弛过程在很大程度上被忽视了，有关该患者群体肌肉松弛状况的文献也非常稀少。一些用于评估老年人肌肉疏松症的工具也可用于 ALS 患者。目前，还没有获得批准的特效药物可以逆转运动神经元的损伤或治愈 ALS，就像没有药物可以治疗肌肉疏松症一样。不过，一些针对肌肉的药物，如肌生长抑素和哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶点抑制剂，正在针对肌肉疏松症和渐进性脊髓侧索硬化症进行研究。开发以骨骼肌为靶点的新治疗药物，可能对渐冻症患者和患有肌肉疏松症的老年人都有好处。
{"title":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as a disease model of sarcopenia","authors":"Domenico Azzolino, Rachele Piras, Aida Zulueta, Tiziano Lucchi, Christian Lunetta","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae209","url":null,"abstract":"Sarcopenia, the progressive decline of muscle mass and function, has traditionally been viewed as an age-related process leading to a broad range of adverse outcomes. However, it has been widely reported that sarcopenia can occur earlier in life in association with various conditions (i.e. disease-related sarcopenia), including neuromuscular disorders. As early as 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People included neurodegenerative diseases characterised by motor neuron loss among the mechanisms underlying sarcopenia. Despite some differences in pathogenetic mechanisms, both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and age-related sarcopenia share common characteristics, such as the loss of motor units and muscle fibre atrophy, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation. The histology of older muscle shows fibre size heterogeneity, fibre grouping and a loss of satellite cells, similar to what is observed in ALS patients. Regrettably, the sarcopenic process in ALS patients has been largely overlooked, and literature on the condition in this patient group is very scarce. Some instruments used for the assessment of sarcopenia in older people could also be applied to ALS patients. At this time, there is no approved specific pharmacological treatment to reverse damage to motor neurons or cure ALS, just as there is none for sarcopenia. However, some agents targeting the muscle, like myostatin and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, are under investigation both in the sarcopenia and ALS context. The development of new therapeutic agents targeting the skeletal muscle may indeed be beneficial to both ALS patients and older people with sarcopenia.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142276913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chien-Chou Su, Yi-Ching Yang, Yu-Huai Yu, Yu-Hsuan Tsai, Deng-Chi Yang
Background We aimed to analyse the differences in the risk of geriatric syndromes between older adults with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients from the US Collaborative Network in the TriNetX between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. We included individuals aged older than 65 years with at least 2 health care visits who underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests during the study period. We excluded those with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, diagnosis with neoplasm and geriatric syndromes before the index date, and death within 30 days after the index date. The index date was defined as the first date of the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for eight geriatric syndromes were estimated for propensity score-matched older adults with and without COVID-19. Subgroup analyses of sex and age were also performed. Results After propensity score matching, 315 826 patients were included (mean [standard deviation] age, 73.5 [6.4] years; 46.7% males and 51.7% females). The three greatest relative increases in the risk of geriatric syndromes in the COVID-19 cohort were cognitive impairment (HR: 3.13; 95% CI: 2.96–3.31), depressive disorder (HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 2.62–2.82) and pressure injury (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 2.34–2.71). Conclusions The risk of developing geriatric syndromes is much higher in the COVID-19 cohort. It is imperative that clinicians endeavour to prevent or minimise the development of these syndromes in the post-COVID-19 era.
{"title":"The risk of geriatric syndromes in older COVID-19 survivors among the nonvaccinated population: a real world retrospective cohort study","authors":"Chien-Chou Su, Yi-Ching Yang, Yu-Huai Yu, Yu-Hsuan Tsai, Deng-Chi Yang","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae205","url":null,"abstract":"Background We aimed to analyse the differences in the risk of geriatric syndromes between older adults with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients from the US Collaborative Network in the TriNetX between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. We included individuals aged older than 65 years with at least 2 health care visits who underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests during the study period. We excluded those with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, diagnosis with neoplasm and geriatric syndromes before the index date, and death within 30 days after the index date. The index date was defined as the first date of the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for eight geriatric syndromes were estimated for propensity score-matched older adults with and without COVID-19. Subgroup analyses of sex and age were also performed. Results After propensity score matching, 315 826 patients were included (mean [standard deviation] age, 73.5 [6.4] years; 46.7% males and 51.7% females). The three greatest relative increases in the risk of geriatric syndromes in the COVID-19 cohort were cognitive impairment (HR: 3.13; 95% CI: 2.96–3.31), depressive disorder (HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 2.62–2.82) and pressure injury (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 2.34–2.71). Conclusions The risk of developing geriatric syndromes is much higher in the COVID-19 cohort. It is imperative that clinicians endeavour to prevent or minimise the development of these syndromes in the post-COVID-19 era.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142276915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Phoebe Scarfield, Amy R Sharkey, Jugdeep K Dhesi, Bijan Modarai, Mark R Tyrrell, Judith S L Partridge
Design An observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral center for aortic surgery to describe the medical and surgical characteristics of patients assessed for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and examine associations with 12-month outcome. Methods Patients with aortic aneurysms referred for discussion at the aortic multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). Data were collected via a prospectively maintained clinical database and included aneurysm characteristics, patient demographics, co-morbidities, geriatric syndromes, including frailty, management decision and 12-month mortality, both aneurysm-related and all-cause including cause of death. The operative and non-operative groups were compared statistically. Results 621 patients referred to aortic MDM; 292 patients listed for operative management, 141 patients continued on surveillance, 138 patients for non-operative management. There was a higher 12-month mortality rate in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (41% vs 7%, P = <0.001). In the non-operative group, 16 patients (29%) died of aneurysm rupture within 12 months, with 39 patients (71%) dying from other medical causes. Non-operatively managed patients were older, more likely to have cardiac and respiratory disease and more likely to be living with frailty, cognitive impairment and functional limitation, compared to the operative group. Conclusion This study shows that preoperative geriatric syndromes and increased comorbidity lead to shared decision to non-operatively manage asymptomatic aortic aneurysms. Twelve-month mortality is higher in the non-operative group with the majority of deaths occurring due to cause other than aneurysm rupture. These findings support the need for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment followed by multispecialty discussion and shared decision making.
{"title":"Preoperative clinical characteristics and 12-month outcomes following operative or non-operative management of asymptomatic aortic aneurysms","authors":"Phoebe Scarfield, Amy R Sharkey, Jugdeep K Dhesi, Bijan Modarai, Mark R Tyrrell, Judith S L Partridge","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae193","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae193","url":null,"abstract":"Design An observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral center for aortic surgery to describe the medical and surgical characteristics of patients assessed for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and examine associations with 12-month outcome. Methods Patients with aortic aneurysms referred for discussion at the aortic multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). Data were collected via a prospectively maintained clinical database and included aneurysm characteristics, patient demographics, co-morbidities, geriatric syndromes, including frailty, management decision and 12-month mortality, both aneurysm-related and all-cause including cause of death. The operative and non-operative groups were compared statistically. Results 621 patients referred to aortic MDM; 292 patients listed for operative management, 141 patients continued on surveillance, 138 patients for non-operative management. There was a higher 12-month mortality rate in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (41% vs 7%, P = &lt;0.001). In the non-operative group, 16 patients (29%) died of aneurysm rupture within 12 months, with 39 patients (71%) dying from other medical causes. Non-operatively managed patients were older, more likely to have cardiac and respiratory disease and more likely to be living with frailty, cognitive impairment and functional limitation, compared to the operative group. Conclusion This study shows that preoperative geriatric syndromes and increased comorbidity lead to shared decision to non-operatively manage asymptomatic aortic aneurysms. Twelve-month mortality is higher in the non-operative group with the majority of deaths occurring due to cause other than aneurysm rupture. These findings support the need for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment followed by multispecialty discussion and shared decision making.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142275496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yuxiao Li, Rebecca M Smith, Susan L Whitney, Barry M Seemungal, Toby J Ellmers
Background Dizziness is common in older adults, especially in those attending falls services. Yet, the extent to which dizziness is associated with future falls has not been reviewed. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the association between dizziness and future falls and related injuries in older adults. Methods EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, SCOPUS and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to 5 February 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42022371839). Meta-analyses were conducted for the associations of dizziness with future falls (including recurrent and injurious falls). Three meta-analyses were performed on different outcomes: any-type falls (≥1 falls), recurrent falls (≥2 falls) and injurious falls. Results Twenty-nine articles were included in the systematic review (N = 103 306 participants). In a meta-analysis of 14 articles (N = 46 795 participants), dizziness was associated with significantly higher odds of any-type future falls (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.44–1.84). In another meta-analysis involving seven articles (N = 5630 participants), individuals with dizziness also had significantly higher odds of future recurrent falls (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.62–2.42). For both meta-analyses, significant overall associations were observed even when adjusted for important confounding variables. In contrast, a meta-analysis (three articles, N = 46 631 participants) revealed a lack of significant association between dizziness and future injurious falls (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.87–1.45). Conclusions Dizziness is an independent predictor of future falls in older adults. These findings emphasise the importance of recognising dizziness as a risk factor for falls and implementing appropriate interventions.
{"title":"Association between dizziness and future falls and fall-related injuries in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yuxiao Li, Rebecca M Smith, Susan L Whitney, Barry M Seemungal, Toby J Ellmers","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae177","url":null,"abstract":"Background Dizziness is common in older adults, especially in those attending falls services. Yet, the extent to which dizziness is associated with future falls has not been reviewed. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the association between dizziness and future falls and related injuries in older adults. Methods EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, SCOPUS and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to 5 February 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42022371839). Meta-analyses were conducted for the associations of dizziness with future falls (including recurrent and injurious falls). Three meta-analyses were performed on different outcomes: any-type falls (≥1 falls), recurrent falls (≥2 falls) and injurious falls. Results Twenty-nine articles were included in the systematic review (N = 103 306 participants). In a meta-analysis of 14 articles (N = 46 795 participants), dizziness was associated with significantly higher odds of any-type future falls (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.44–1.84). In another meta-analysis involving seven articles (N = 5630 participants), individuals with dizziness also had significantly higher odds of future recurrent falls (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.62–2.42). For both meta-analyses, significant overall associations were observed even when adjusted for important confounding variables. In contrast, a meta-analysis (three articles, N = 46 631 participants) revealed a lack of significant association between dizziness and future injurious falls (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.87–1.45). Conclusions Dizziness is an independent predictor of future falls in older adults. These findings emphasise the importance of recognising dizziness as a risk factor for falls and implementing appropriate interventions.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142245513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Adults with frailty have palliative care needs [1] but have disproportionately less access to palliative care services [2]. Frailty affects ~4000 patients admitted to hospital per day in the UK [3], making the hospital admission a unique opportunity to assess palliative care needs and deliver interventions. Objectives Synthesise the evidence regarding hospital palliative care (HPC) for patients with frailty. Narratively analyse the evidence regarding methods used to identify palliative care needs; types of palliative care interventions studied; and whether HPC improves outcomes. Methods Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of experimental, observational and systematic review articles investigating palliative care interventions for hospitalised adults aged ≥65 years with frailty. Electronic search of five databases from database inception to 30 January 2023. Included studies analysed using narrative synthesis according to Popay et al [4]. Results 15 465 titles retrieved, 12 included. Three studies detailed how they identified palliative care needs; all three used prognostication e.g. the ‘surprise question’. Most papers (10/12) investigated specialist palliative care interventions. These interventions addressed a wider range of care needs than non-specialist interventions. Evidence suggested an improvement in some symptom burden and healthcare utilisation outcomes following HPC. Conclusion Prognostication was the main method of identifying palliative care needs, rather than individuals’ specific needs. Specialist palliative care interventions were more holistic, indicating that non-specialist palliative care approaches may benefit from specialist team input. Despite suggestions of improvement in some outcomes with palliative care, heterogenous evidence prevented establishment of conclusive effects.
{"title":"Hospital-initiated palliative care interventions for adults with frailty: findings from a systematic review and narrative synthesis","authors":"Phoebe Sharratt, Antony Zacharias, Amara Callistus Nwosu, Amy Gadoud","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae190","url":null,"abstract":"Background Adults with frailty have palliative care needs [1] but have disproportionately less access to palliative care services [2]. Frailty affects ~4000 patients admitted to hospital per day in the UK [3], making the hospital admission a unique opportunity to assess palliative care needs and deliver interventions. Objectives Synthesise the evidence regarding hospital palliative care (HPC) for patients with frailty. Narratively analyse the evidence regarding methods used to identify palliative care needs; types of palliative care interventions studied; and whether HPC improves outcomes. Methods Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of experimental, observational and systematic review articles investigating palliative care interventions for hospitalised adults aged ≥65 years with frailty. Electronic search of five databases from database inception to 30 January 2023. Included studies analysed using narrative synthesis according to Popay et al [4]. Results 15 465 titles retrieved, 12 included. Three studies detailed how they identified palliative care needs; all three used prognostication e.g. the ‘surprise question’. Most papers (10/12) investigated specialist palliative care interventions. These interventions addressed a wider range of care needs than non-specialist interventions. Evidence suggested an improvement in some symptom burden and healthcare utilisation outcomes following HPC. Conclusion Prognostication was the main method of identifying palliative care needs, rather than individuals’ specific needs. Specialist palliative care interventions were more holistic, indicating that non-specialist palliative care approaches may benefit from specialist team input. Despite suggestions of improvement in some outcomes with palliative care, heterogenous evidence prevented establishment of conclusive effects.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142236861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：