Steven D Johnson, Jeremy J Midgley, Luis G Bocourt-Hernandez, F G Loiret, Patricia Ortega-Rodés, Nicola Illing
Premise: Flowers that present their anthers and stigma in close proximity can achieve precise animal-mediated pollen transfer, but risk self-pollination. One evolutionary solution is reciprocal herkogamy. Reciprocity of anther and style positions among different plants (i.e., a genetic dimorphism) is common in distylous plants, but very rare in enantiostylous plants. We investigated the pollination and reproductive system of the enantiostylous Caribbean plant Cubanicula xanthorrhizos (Haemodoraceae).
Methods: We assessed stylar orientation of flowers and conducted controlled pollination experiments. We used videography of flower visitors and pollen load analysis to determine the pollination mechanism. We also measured floral morphology, pollen production, spectral reflectance, and volatile emissions.
Results: Cubanicula xanthorrhizos exhibits dimorphic enantiostyly with c. 50:50 left- to right-styled morphs. Plants are self-compatible, but pollinator dependent for seed production. Intra- and intermorph crosses are equally fertile. The nectarless flowers are pollinated by female carpenter bees (Xylocopa cubaecola) that collect pollen, often by sonication, from two centrally positioned yellow feeding anthers. An inconspicuous deflected pollinating anther deposits pollen on the side of the bee thorax, which contacts the stigma of the mirror-image morph. A yellow-orange "guide" on the white tepals appears to be a visual attractant. Flowers emit methoxy benzenoid volatiles that may also attract bees.
Conclusions: Reciprocity of the style with a single pollinating stamen in C. xanthorrhizos appears to promote intermorph pollen export via "safe sites" on pollen-collecting bees. This novel case of dimorphic enantiostyly contributes to understanding of the evolution of floral polymorphisms.
{"title":"Dimorphic enantiostyly and its function for pollination by carpenter bees in a pollen-rewarding Caribbean bloodwort.","authors":"Steven D Johnson, Jeremy J Midgley, Luis G Bocourt-Hernandez, F G Loiret, Patricia Ortega-Rodés, Nicola Illing","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>Flowers that present their anthers and stigma in close proximity can achieve precise animal-mediated pollen transfer, but risk self-pollination. One evolutionary solution is reciprocal herkogamy. Reciprocity of anther and style positions among different plants (i.e., a genetic dimorphism) is common in distylous plants, but very rare in enantiostylous plants. We investigated the pollination and reproductive system of the enantiostylous Caribbean plant Cubanicula xanthorrhizos (Haemodoraceae).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed stylar orientation of flowers and conducted controlled pollination experiments. We used videography of flower visitors and pollen load analysis to determine the pollination mechanism. We also measured floral morphology, pollen production, spectral reflectance, and volatile emissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cubanicula xanthorrhizos exhibits dimorphic enantiostyly with c. 50:50 left- to right-styled morphs. Plants are self-compatible, but pollinator dependent for seed production. Intra- and intermorph crosses are equally fertile. The nectarless flowers are pollinated by female carpenter bees (Xylocopa cubaecola) that collect pollen, often by sonication, from two centrally positioned yellow feeding anthers. An inconspicuous deflected pollinating anther deposits pollen on the side of the bee thorax, which contacts the stigma of the mirror-image morph. A yellow-orange \"guide\" on the white tepals appears to be a visual attractant. Flowers emit methoxy benzenoid volatiles that may also attract bees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reciprocity of the style with a single pollinating stamen in C. xanthorrhizos appears to promote intermorph pollen export via \"safe sites\" on pollen-collecting bees. This novel case of dimorphic enantiostyly contributes to understanding of the evolution of floral polymorphisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea E. Berardi, José Carlos del Valle, Matthew H. Koski, Eduardo Narbona, Justen Whittall
<p>Flower color plays a central role in pollination, functioning as one of the major traits attracting pollinators. The close relationship between flower color phenotypes and pollination has been studied extensively, and we are still learning about the intricacies of the role of flower color in plant–pollinator relationships. However, there are also other alternative, complementary, and important functions that flower color plays a role in, often due to alternative functions of pigments behind the color, the traits that are tightly correlated with flower color, or structural epidermal changes. For example, many of the flavonoid-based pigments (including anthocyanins) in plants function as antioxidants or provide protection against extreme temperatures, drought, UV radiation, pathogens, herbivores, and other selective agents. These additional pigment functions may explain the current distribution of flower colors across environmental gradients and may have important consequences when interpreting plant adaptations to pollinators and their environment, particularly in the face of rapid and ongoing changes in climate globally (Koski et al., <span>2020</span>; Sullivan et al., <span>2021</span>; Lacey, <span>2025</span>). Carotenoids and betalains, the other major groups of flower pigments, also have antioxidant activity, although their protective roles in flowers are less well characterized.</p><p>The purpose of this special issue is not to question or diminish the role of pollinators in flower color diversity, but rather to highlight the alternative, complementary, and even antagonistic roles, selective pressures, and macroevolutionary patterns that can shape flower color—reflecting an emerging paradigm shift in how we study and understand floral color. The articles in this special issue cover a broad range of approaches to study and assess flower color in the field, greenhouse, and laboratory including biochemical quantification, reflectance spectra, photography, physics, modeling, citizen-science databases, and herbarium collections.</p><p>The research in this special issue helps to expand our understanding of the forces shaping flower color, revealing complex interplays between biotic partners, abiotic conditions, and intrinsic physiological and macroevolutionary correlations and constraints. For example, Sinnott-Armstrong et al. (<span>2026</span>) link macroevolutionary patterns of flower and fruit color across lineages, and Dellinger et al. (<span>2025</span>) challenge a long-standing paradigm that flower colors are primarily molded by animal visual systems, instead highlighting that flowers and fruits often experience distinct suites of abiotic selective pressures. This shift toward a more integrative framework is echoed by studies demonstrating environmentally and ecologically mediated divergence. Camargo et al. (<span>2026</span>) show how both biotic and abiotic factors drive the diversification of color traits across the mosaic landscap
{"title":"Paradigm shifts in flower color: An introduction","authors":"Andrea E. Berardi, José Carlos del Valle, Matthew H. Koski, Eduardo Narbona, Justen Whittall","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70150","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajb2.70150","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flower color plays a central role in pollination, functioning as one of the major traits attracting pollinators. The close relationship between flower color phenotypes and pollination has been studied extensively, and we are still learning about the intricacies of the role of flower color in plant–pollinator relationships. However, there are also other alternative, complementary, and important functions that flower color plays a role in, often due to alternative functions of pigments behind the color, the traits that are tightly correlated with flower color, or structural epidermal changes. For example, many of the flavonoid-based pigments (including anthocyanins) in plants function as antioxidants or provide protection against extreme temperatures, drought, UV radiation, pathogens, herbivores, and other selective agents. These additional pigment functions may explain the current distribution of flower colors across environmental gradients and may have important consequences when interpreting plant adaptations to pollinators and their environment, particularly in the face of rapid and ongoing changes in climate globally (Koski et al., <span>2020</span>; Sullivan et al., <span>2021</span>; Lacey, <span>2025</span>). Carotenoids and betalains, the other major groups of flower pigments, also have antioxidant activity, although their protective roles in flowers are less well characterized.</p><p>The purpose of this special issue is not to question or diminish the role of pollinators in flower color diversity, but rather to highlight the alternative, complementary, and even antagonistic roles, selective pressures, and macroevolutionary patterns that can shape flower color—reflecting an emerging paradigm shift in how we study and understand floral color. The articles in this special issue cover a broad range of approaches to study and assess flower color in the field, greenhouse, and laboratory including biochemical quantification, reflectance spectra, photography, physics, modeling, citizen-science databases, and herbarium collections.</p><p>The research in this special issue helps to expand our understanding of the forces shaping flower color, revealing complex interplays between biotic partners, abiotic conditions, and intrinsic physiological and macroevolutionary correlations and constraints. For example, Sinnott-Armstrong et al. (<span>2026</span>) link macroevolutionary patterns of flower and fruit color across lineages, and Dellinger et al. (<span>2025</span>) challenge a long-standing paradigm that flower colors are primarily molded by animal visual systems, instead highlighting that flowers and fruits often experience distinct suites of abiotic selective pressures. This shift toward a more integrative framework is echoed by studies demonstrating environmentally and ecologically mediated divergence. Camargo et al. (<span>2026</span>) show how both biotic and abiotic factors drive the diversification of color traits across the mosaic landscap","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70150","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}