首页 > 最新文献

Organizational behavior and human performance最新文献

英文 中文
Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing 决策行为的补偿和非补偿模型的度量:过程跟踪与策略捕获
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90129-0
Robert S. Billings, Stephen A. Marcus

While a variety of techniques have been used to infer compensatory versus noncompensatory decision making, few studies have used multiple measures in order to evaluate their validity. Using a sample of 48 college students, this study examines two measures from a search task (the variability and pattern of search on an information board) and three measures from a rating or judgment task (nonlinear regression modeling, ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity). The validity of these measures is assessed by their sensitivity to a manipulation of information load and their extent of convergence with one another. The variability of search on the information board and the ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity all indicated an increase in noncompensatory decision making under high information load, while the regression modeling measure did not. There was some convergence between the regression and ANOVA indices, but no relation between the search task and rating task measures. It is concluded that the ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity are more sensitive measures than the nonlinear regression procedure. The information board and ANOVA measures are apparently both valid indices of noncompensatory decision making; they may lack convergence because they represent different parts of the decision process (information acquisition vs combination) or require different responses (choice vs judgment).

虽然已经使用了各种各样的技术来推断补偿与非补偿决策,但很少有研究使用多种措施来评估其有效性。本研究以48名大学生为样本,考察了搜索任务(信息板上搜索的可变性和模式)和评分或判断任务(非线性回归建模、交互和曲线的方差分析)的两个指标。这些措施的有效性是通过它们对信息负荷操纵的敏感性和它们彼此收敛的程度来评估的。信息板搜索的可变性、交互作用和曲线度的方差分析均表明,在高信息负荷下,非补偿性决策增加,而回归建模测量则没有。回归指标与方差分析指标之间存在一定的收敛性,但搜索任务与评分任务测度之间不存在相关性。结果表明,相互作用和曲线的方差分析方法比非线性回归方法更敏感。信息板测度和方差分析测度显然都是有效的非补偿性决策指标;它们可能缺乏收敛性,因为它们代表决策过程的不同部分(信息获取vs组合)或需要不同的响应(选择vs判断)。
{"title":"Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing","authors":"Robert S. Billings,&nbsp;Stephen A. Marcus","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90129-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90129-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While a variety of techniques have been used to infer compensatory versus noncompensatory decision making, few studies have used multiple measures in order to evaluate their validity. Using a sample of 48 college students, this study examines two measures from a search task (the variability and pattern of search on an information board) and three measures from a rating or judgment task (nonlinear regression modeling, ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity). The validity of these measures is assessed by their sensitivity to a manipulation of information load and their extent of convergence with one another. The variability of search on the information board and the ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity all indicated an increase in noncompensatory decision making under high information load, while the regression modeling measure did not. There was some convergence between the regression and ANOVA indices, but no relation between the search task and rating task measures. It is concluded that the ANOVA measures of interaction and curvilinearity are more sensitive measures than the nonlinear regression procedure. The information board and ANOVA measures are apparently both valid indices of noncompensatory decision making; they may lack convergence because they represent different parts of the decision process (information acquisition vs combination) or require different responses (choice vs judgment).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 331-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90129-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 193
The identification of people for whom job descriptive index scores are inappropriate 对那些工作描述指数得分不合适的人的识别
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90131-9
Charles K. Parsons

Occasionally, personal and situational factors can adversely affect measurement accuracy of job satisfaction questionnaires. Fatigue, misunderstood instructions, and poor reading comprehension are examples where at least some observed responses to questionnaires may not be meaningfully related to an individual's existing level of job satisfaction. Appropriateness indices (M. V. Levine & D. Rubin, Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979, 4, 269–290) are a method of quantifying the probability of response patterns in order to identify those questionnaires containing unexpected responses. The indices in this study, based on a two-parameter item response model, showed good hit rates for identifying experimentally distorted response patterns. Further predictions concerning lower scale variance in samples with lower appropriateness indices were also substantiated in three large samples of survey data. These results are discussed in relation to potential improvements in the appropriateness index, the systematic study of undesirable response distortion, and applications of the research.

偶尔,个人因素和情境因素会对工作满意度问卷的测量准确性产生不利影响。疲劳、误解指示和阅读理解能力差是至少一些观察到的问卷回答可能与个人现有的工作满意度水平没有意义相关的例子。适当性指数(m.v. Levine &;D. Rubin, Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979, 4,269 - 290)是一种量化回答模式概率的方法,以便识别那些包含意外回答的问卷。本研究中基于双参数项目反应模型的指标在识别实验扭曲的反应模式方面显示出良好的命中率。在三个大样本的调查数据中也证实了有关适当性指数较低的样本的更低尺度方差的进一步预测。这些结果与适当性指数的潜在改进、不良反应失真的系统研究以及研究的应用有关。
{"title":"The identification of people for whom job descriptive index scores are inappropriate","authors":"Charles K. Parsons","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90131-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90131-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Occasionally, personal and situational factors can adversely affect measurement accuracy of job satisfaction questionnaires. Fatigue, misunderstood instructions, and poor reading comprehension are examples where at least some observed responses to questionnaires may not be meaningfully related to an individual's existing level of job satisfaction. Appropriateness indices (<span>M. V. Levine &amp; D. Rubin, <em>Journal of Educational Statistics</em>, 1979,</span> <strong>4</strong>, 269–290) are a method of quantifying the probability of response patterns in order to identify those questionnaires containing unexpected responses. The indices in this study, based on a two-parameter item response model, showed good hit rates for identifying experimentally distorted response patterns. Further predictions concerning lower scale variance in samples with lower appropriateness indices were also substantiated in three large samples of survey data. These results are discussed in relation to potential improvements in the appropriateness index, the systematic study of undesirable response distortion, and applications of the research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 365-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90131-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Author index for volume 31 第31卷的作者索引
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90134-4
{"title":"Author index for volume 31","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90134-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90134-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Page 419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90134-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136848842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of the mixed-cultural work group 跨文化工作团队的管理
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90128-9
Lynn R. Anderson

Survey data were obtained from 84 New Zealand Pakeha (white) male managers to explore how cultural composition of the work group affected the relationship between leader behavior and leader effectiveness. Factor analysis identified five leadership factors composed of items from American leadership scales and items from interviews with New Zealand employees. Organizationally rated performance evaluations were obtained for each manager along with self-rated evaluations of effectiveness. The managers also rated their level of satisfaction, relations with subordinates, relations among subordinates, and relations with their own boss. Results indicated that three of the leadership factors were significantly correlated with managerial effectiveness for first-level managers and the two remaining factors were significantly correlated with effectiveness at middle-level management. Due to unique socioeconomic conditions in New Zealand, the work groups showed wide variations in cultural (ethnic) composition, ranging from homogeneous up to a mix of five diverse, often antagonistic, ethnic populations. Yet at both levels of management the degree of cultural heterogeneity within the work group did not affect the relationship between the group leader's behavior and the leader's effectiveness. Cultural heterogeneity of the work group was also unrelated to the leader's overall satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, promotion, and supervision. Leader—member relations, relations among work group members, and the relation between the leader and the leader's own supervisor were also unrelated to cultural heterogeneity of the work group. Similar results were obtained for a very small sample of Polynesian male managers and for a sample of Pakeha (white) female managers. Because organizational level produced major differences in the effectiveness of the leadership factors, it was concluded that the tasks of the work groups determined the effectiveness of the leader's behavior while the cultural background of group members may have influenced the difficulty of implementing the necessary leadership behavior.

调查数据来自84名新西兰Pakeha(白人)男性管理者,以探讨工作组的文化构成如何影响领导者行为和领导者效能之间的关系。因子分析确定了五个领导力因素,这些因素由美国领导力量表中的项目和新西兰员工访谈中的项目组成。获得了每位经理的组织评级绩效评估以及自评有效性评估。经理们还对自己的满意度、与下属的关系、下属之间的关系以及与自己老板的关系进行了打分。结果表明,其中3个领导因素与基层管理者的管理效能显著相关,其余2个因素与中层管理者的管理效能显著相关。由于新西兰独特的社会经济条件,工作组在文化(种族)构成方面表现出很大的差异,从同质到五种不同的、经常是敌对的种族人口的混合。然而,在这两个管理层次上,团队内部文化异质性的程度并不影响团队领导行为与领导效能之间的关系。工作团队的文化异质性也与领导者的总体满意度无关,包括对薪酬、晋升和监督的满意度。领导与成员关系、工作组成员之间的关系、领导与领导自己的主管之间的关系也与工作组的文化异质性无关。在一个非常小的波利尼西亚男性经理样本和一个Pakeha(白人)女性经理样本中也得到了类似的结果。由于组织层次对领导因素的有效性产生了重大差异,因此可以得出结论,工作组的任务决定了领导者行为的有效性,而团队成员的文化背景可能影响了实施必要领导行为的难度。
{"title":"Management of the mixed-cultural work group","authors":"Lynn R. Anderson","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90128-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90128-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Survey data were obtained from 84 New Zealand Pakeha (white) male managers to explore how cultural composition of the work group affected the relationship between leader behavior and leader effectiveness. Factor analysis identified five leadership factors composed of items from American leadership scales and items from interviews with New Zealand employees. Organizationally rated performance evaluations were obtained for each manager along with self-rated evaluations of effectiveness. The managers also rated their level of satisfaction, relations with subordinates, relations among subordinates, and relations with their own boss. Results indicated that three of the leadership factors were significantly correlated with managerial effectiveness for first-level managers and the two remaining factors were significantly correlated with effectiveness at middle-level management. Due to unique socioeconomic conditions in New Zealand, the work groups showed wide variations in cultural (ethnic) composition, ranging from homogeneous up to a mix of five diverse, often antagonistic, ethnic populations. Yet at both levels of management the degree of cultural heterogeneity within the work group did not affect the relationship between the group leader's behavior and the leader's effectiveness. Cultural heterogeneity of the work group was also unrelated to the leader's overall satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, promotion, and supervision. Leader—member relations, relations among work group members, and the relation between the leader and the leader's own supervisor were also unrelated to cultural heterogeneity of the work group. Similar results were obtained for a very small sample of Polynesian male managers and for a sample of Pakeha (white) female managers. Because organizational level produced major differences in the effectiveness of the leadership factors, it was concluded that the tasks of the work groups determined the effectiveness of the leader's behavior while the cultural background of group members may have influenced the difficulty of implementing the necessary leadership behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 303-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90128-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
Acknowledgment 鸣谢
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90133-2
{"title":"Acknowledgment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90133-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90133-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Page 418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90133-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136848843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of pay and market pay variability in job application decisions 薪酬和市场薪酬变化在求职决策中的作用
Pub Date : 1983-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90130-7
Sara L. Rynes, Donald P. Schwab, Herbert G. Heneman III

The influence of pay and three other attributes on job application decisions under two sets of market conditions were examined. Consistent with economic hypothesizing, results suggested that most respondents used noncompensatory strategies to evaluate pay in making their application decisions. Moreover, both model usage and the pay importance appeared to vary as a function of market pay variability. Results are discussed primarily in terms of likely limitations to the generalizability of findings obtained from studies of attribute importance.

在两组市场条件下,考察了薪酬和其他三个属性对工作申请决策的影响。与经济学假设一致,结果表明,大多数受访者在做出申请决策时使用非补偿性策略来评估薪酬。此外,模型的使用和薪酬的重要性似乎随着市场薪酬的变化而变化。结果主要是根据属性重要性研究结果的可推广性的可能局限性来讨论的。
{"title":"The role of pay and market pay variability in job application decisions","authors":"Sara L. Rynes,&nbsp;Donald P. Schwab,&nbsp;Herbert G. Heneman III","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90130-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90130-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The influence of pay and three other attributes on job application decisions under two sets of market conditions were examined. Consistent with economic hypothesizing, results suggested that most respondents used noncompensatory strategies to evaluate pay in making their application decisions. Moreover, both model usage and the pay importance appeared to vary as a function of market pay variability. Results are discussed primarily in terms of likely limitations to the generalizability of findings obtained from studies of attribute importance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 353-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90130-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 161
External validity tests of laboratory studies of information integration 信息集成实验室研究的外部效度检验
Pub Date : 1983-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90119-8
Irwin P. Levin, Jordan J. Louviere, Albert A. Schepanski, Kent L. Norman

Laboratory research aimed at increased understanding of judgment and decision-making behavior has been criticized for lack of external validity. To counter this criticism, the present paper describes a number of laboratory studies of information integration that demonstrate that responses to independent variable manipulations in the laboratory are meaningfully related to factors external to the task and are predictive of decisions made outside the laboratory. Suggestions are made for how researchers can increase the generalizability and external validity of their results by taking into account differences between the laboratory setting and the natural environment.

旨在提高对判断和决策行为的理解的实验室研究因缺乏外部有效性而受到批评。为了反驳这一批评,本文描述了一些关于信息集成的实验室研究,这些研究表明,对实验室中自变量操作的响应与任务外部因素有意义的关系,并且可以预测实验室外做出的决策。对研究人员如何通过考虑实验室环境和自然环境之间的差异来增加其结果的普遍性和外部有效性提出了建议。
{"title":"External validity tests of laboratory studies of information integration","authors":"Irwin P. Levin,&nbsp;Jordan J. Louviere,&nbsp;Albert A. Schepanski,&nbsp;Kent L. Norman","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90119-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90119-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laboratory research aimed at increased understanding of judgment and decision-making behavior has been criticized for lack of external validity. To counter this criticism, the present paper describes a number of laboratory studies of information integration that demonstrate that responses to independent variable manipulations in the laboratory are meaningfully related to factors external to the task and are predictive of decisions made outside the laboratory. Suggestions are made for how researchers can increase the generalizability and external validity of their results by taking into account differences between the laboratory setting and the natural environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 173-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90119-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108
The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down 积极情绪对冒险的影响:关键时刻
Pub Date : 1983-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4
Alice M. Isen, Robert Patrick

Two studies conducted simultaneously investigated the influence of positive affect on risk taking. Results of the study, which employed an actual measure of subjects' willingness to bet something of value, supported the prediction of an interaction between level of risk and positive affect: subjects who had reason to be feeling elated bet more than control subjects on a low-risk bet, but wagered less than controls on a high-risk bet. At the same time, in contrast, a study involving hypothetical risk-taking showed that in general subjects were more willing to take the chance as probability of success went up; but that elated subjects were more daring than controls on a “long shot.” Differences in hypothetical vs real risk taking were noted, and the complexity (the interaction) of the influence of positive feelings on real risk taking was emphasized. The results were related to other research suggesting an influence of feeling states on cognitive processes and decision making.

同时进行的两项研究调查了积极情绪对冒险行为的影响。这项研究采用了一种实际测量受试者对有价值的东西下注意愿的方法,其结果支持了风险水平与积极影响之间相互作用的预测:在低风险的赌注中,有理由感到高兴的受试者比对照组的受试者下注更多,但在高风险的赌注中,他们的赌注比对照组的受试者少。与此同时,与此相反,一项涉及假设冒险的研究表明,一般来说,随着成功可能性的增加,受试者更愿意冒险;但是,兴高采烈的受试者在“长镜头”上比对照组更大胆。注意到假设风险与实际风险承担的差异,并强调了积极情绪对实际风险承担影响的复杂性(相互作用)。这一结果与其他研究有关,表明情绪状态对认知过程和决策的影响。
{"title":"The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down","authors":"Alice M. Isen,&nbsp;Robert Patrick","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two studies conducted simultaneously investigated the influence of positive affect on risk taking. Results of the study, which employed an actual measure of subjects' willingness to bet something of value, supported the prediction of an interaction between level of risk and positive affect: subjects who had reason to be feeling elated bet more than control subjects on a low-risk bet, but wagered less than controls on a high-risk bet. At the same time, in contrast, a study involving hypothetical risk-taking showed that in general subjects were more willing to take the chance as probability of success went up; but that elated subjects were more daring than controls on a “long shot.” Differences in hypothetical vs real risk taking were noted, and the complexity (the interaction) of the influence of positive feelings on real risk taking was emphasized. The results were related to other research suggesting an influence of feeling states on cognitive processes and decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 600
Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? 为自己的判断辩护会改变判断过程的本质吗?
Pub Date : 1983-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90122-8
Roger Hagafors, Berndt Brehmer

The effects of justification on subjects' application of judgment policies in a multiple-cue probability learning task under conditions of high versus low task predictability and provision versus no provision of feedback were investigated. The results showed that having to justify one's judgments will lead to higher consistency in the judgment policy when task predictability is low and no feedback is provided. The results are interpreted as indicating that justification may lead to an analytical mode of functioning in judgment behavior. Implications for research in cognitive conflict are also discussed.

在多线索概率学习任务中,考察了在任务可预测性高与低、提供与不提供反馈的条件下,证明对被试判断策略应用的影响。结果表明,当任务可预测性较低且没有反馈时,必须证明自己的判断会导致更高的判断策略一致性。结果被解释为表明辩护可能导致判断行为中的分析功能模式。对认知冲突研究的启示也进行了讨论。
{"title":"Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process?","authors":"Roger Hagafors,&nbsp;Berndt Brehmer","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90122-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90122-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of justification on subjects' application of judgment policies in a multiple-cue probability learning task under conditions of high versus low task predictability and provision versus no provision of feedback were investigated. The results showed that having to justify one's judgments will lead to higher consistency in the judgment policy when task predictability is low and no feedback is provided. The results are interpreted as indicating that justification may lead to an analytical mode of functioning in judgment behavior. Implications for research in cognitive conflict are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 223-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90122-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 183
Believing is not the same as testing: A reply to Beyth-Marom and Arkes 相信不等于测试:对beth - marom和Arkes的回复
Pub Date : 1983-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90125-3
Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski, Lee Roy Beach

Several of Beyth-Marom and Arkes' criticisms of our original article arise from their misunderstanding our conclusions. This reply clarifies those misunderstandings. We reiterate our conclusion that even though people may not use normative rules in laboratory tasks, they still can make inferences that are nearly as optimal as those they would have made if they had been using those rules. This reply also elaborates upon our concern about the use of quantitative word problems to test human inference. We submit that additional evidence is needed to justify continued reliance on these problems.

beth - marom和Arkes对我们原文的一些批评源于他们对我们结论的误解。这个答复澄清了这些误解。我们重申我们的结论,即使人们在实验室任务中可能不使用规范规则,他们仍然可以做出几乎和他们使用这些规则时一样最佳的推断。这个答复还详细阐述了我们对使用定量单词问题来测试人类推理的关注。我们认为需要更多的证据来证明继续依赖这些问题是合理的。
{"title":"Believing is not the same as testing: A reply to Beyth-Marom and Arkes","authors":"Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,&nbsp;Lee Roy Beach","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90125-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90125-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several of Beyth-Marom and Arkes' criticisms of our original article arise from their misunderstanding our conclusions. This reply clarifies those misunderstandings. We reiterate our conclusion that even though people may not use normative rules in laboratory tasks, they still can make inferences that are nearly as optimal as those they would have made if they had been using those rules. This reply also elaborates upon our concern about the use of quantitative word problems to test human inference. We submit that additional evidence is needed to justify continued reliance on these problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 258-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90125-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53836259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
期刊
Organizational behavior and human performance
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1