American Journal of Clinical Dermatology最新文献

Background

The phase III KEYNOTE-913 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

Objective

The aim was to report results from the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-913.

Patients and Methods

Patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 treatments (~ 2 years). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability.

Results

Fifty-five patients were treated with pembrolizumab. The median time from first dose to data cutoff (February 15, 2024) was 50.3 months (range 38.7–59.4). The ORR was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35–63), with 12 complete responses and 15 partial responses. The median DOR was 39.8 months (range 4.8–52.5+), and the 24-month DOR rate was 69%. The median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 3–26), and the 24-month PFS rate was 39%. The median OS was 24.3 months (95% CI 12.4 to not reached), and the 24-month OS rate was 51%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 patients (69%); 13 patients (24%) experienced grade 3–5 AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (n = 12 [22%]), pruritus (n = 12 [22%]), and lipase increase (n = 10 [18%]). One patient died of treatment-related Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity and promising survival and had a manageable safety profile in patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC, supporting its use in this population.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03783078.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychotropic cannabinoid with multiple pharmacological properties. Cannabidiol has attracted growing attention in the cosmetic industry, with an increasing number of CBD-containing skincare products on the market in recent years. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current evidence on the use of CBD for cosmetic purposes. Following an overview of CBD and the endocannabinoid system in the skin, we summarize pre-clinical and clinical studies that address the potential of CBD in cosmetic dermatology. Available in vitro and in vivo evidence suggests that CBD has anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, moisturizing, anti-acne, wound-healing, and anti-aging properties. However, only a few clinical studies have been conducted on the use of CBD in the skin. In addition, there is a critical need to develop an efficient drug-delivery system for topical/transdermal application of CBD. Further research, including clinical and pharmacokinetic studies, are needed to fully evaluate the role of CBD in cosmetic dermatology.

Erythroderma, an inflammatory skin condition characterized by widespread erythema with variable degrees of exfoliation, pustulation, or vesiculobullous formation, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Determining the underlying cause of erythroderma frequently presents a diagnostic challenge, which may contribute to the condition’s relatively poor prognosis. This review covers the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of erythroderma. It discusses similarities and differences among the many underlying etiologies of the condition and differences between erythrodermic and non-erythrodermic presentations of the same dermatosis. Finally, this article explores current research that may provide future tools in the diagnosis and management of erythroderma.

Background

Many morphological and histological changes take place in aging skin. Topical tretinoin is the gold standard anti-aging agent used to reduce signs of aging through stimulation of epidermal growth and differentiation and inhibition of collagenase.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize studies evaluating the efficacy of tretinoin compared with other topical medications and cosmeceuticals in reducing the appearance of skin aging.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Embase databases from conception to December 2023. Studies were included if they compared anti-aging outcomes of topical medications with those of topical tretinoin (also called all-trans retinoic acid and retinoic acid). Studies were excluded if they compared non-topical anti-aging treatments with tretinoin or were conducted on animal models.

Results

The literature search resulted in 25 studies that met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common study comparators to tretinoin included other forms of vitamin A. Outcomes were reported on the basis of visual reduction of aging signs, histological assessment of the epidermis and dermis, and protein expression. Although comparators to tretinoin had variable efficacy (greater in 7 studies, equivalent in 13 studies, and less in 3 studies), most studies found the comparator to be less irritating and better tolerated by patients than tretinoin.

Discussion

Tretinoin is currently the gold standard therapy for the treatment of photoaging, but its poor tolerability often limits its use. Unfortunately, given that most studies comparing topical therapies with tretinoin are of poor quality and/or demonstrate bias, there is a lack of substantial evidence to support an alternative first-line therapy. However, given there are some data to support the efficacy of retinoid precursors, namely retinaldehyde, pro-retinal nanoparticles, and conjugated alpha-hydroxy acid and retinoid (AHA-ret), these agents can be considered a second-line option for anti-aging treatment in patients who cannot tolerate tretinoin.

Background

Intralesional corticosteroid administration (ICA) is a first-line keloid treatment. However, it faces significant variability in current clinical and scientific practice, which hinders comparability of treatment results.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to reach consensus on different aspects of ICA using hypodermic needles in keloids among an international group of dermatologists and plastic surgeons specialized in keloid treatment to provide consensus-based clinical treatment recommendations for all physicians treating keloids.

Methods

The keloid expert panel of 12 dermatologists and 11 plastic surgeons rated 30 statements. Two online e-Delphi rounds were held, both with a response rate of 100%. Fifteen (65%) keloid experts participated in the final consensus meetings. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the participants choosing agree or strongly agree on a 7-point Likert scale.

Results

Consensus was reached on treatment goals, indication for ICA, triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) 40 mg/mL as the preferred corticosteroid administered at a maximum of 80 mg per month and at intervals of 4 weeks, minimizing pain during ICA, the use of 1 mL syringes and 25 or 27 Gauge needles, blanching as endpoint of successful infiltration, caution of not injecting subcutaneously, and the option of making multiple passes in very firm keloids prior to infiltration. Consensus could not be reached on TAC dosing, methods of prior local anesthesia, and location of injection.

Conclusions

This e-Delphi study provides important clinical treatment recommendations on essential aspects of ICA in keloids. By implementing these recommendations, uniformity of ICA in keloid treatment will increase and better treatment results may be achieved.

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a complex, challenging, and frequently multifactorial skin disease of the hands. It is very common in the general population, especially in certain professions. When hand eczema (HE) persists for longer than 3 months or has a minimum of two relapses per year after initial manifestation with complete clearance, it is considered chronic. In this case, health-related quality of life and the patient’s working life are often impaired. CHE can be considered as an umbrella term because it covers different clinical pictures and etiologies. To date, there is no definite and unique HE classification. Treatment starts with identifying the individual HE etiology paralleled by symptomatic therapy (local and/or systemic and/or ultraviolet phototherapy). Sustainable management of HE requires the identification and avoidance of its triggering factors, from the professional and private environment. This includes ruling out allergic contact dermatitis if any HE persists for more than 3 months despite adequate therapy. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy in HE are lacking for several treatment modalities. Patient education measures of skin protection and prevention complete the multimodal treatment.