Pub Date : 2024-12-05DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00907-7
David X. Zheng, David J. Bozym, Giuseppe Tarantino, Ryan J. Sullivan, David Liu, Russell W. Jenkins
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.
{"title":"Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Melanoma Immunotherapy","authors":"David X. Zheng, David J. Bozym, Giuseppe Tarantino, Ryan J. Sullivan, David Liu, Russell W. Jenkins","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00907-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00907-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"77 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142783980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00905-9
Olivia M. Katamanin, Isabella J. Tan, Jillian Barry, Mohammad Jafferany
The growing field of psychodermatology examines the interplay between dermatological and psychiatric comorbidities. While current literature recognizes that cutaneous and psychiatric conditions often coexist within patients, the relationship between dysregulated inflammation and depression in patients with inflammatory skin conditions has not been thoroughly explored. This review seeks to describe the connection between cutaneous disease and depression via shared inflammatory cytokine pathways. A review of current literature was conducted, and studies addressing the co-occurrence of depression and inflammatory skin diseases were included. This review focuses on depression in patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. Studies that focused on the prevalence of depression in these populations, shared inflammatory pathways, and co-management of cutaneous and psychiatric disorders were chosen. The literature revealed a high prevalence of depression in individuals with inflammatory skin conditions compared with those without cutaneous disease. Recent studies described how proinflammatory cytokines in inflammatory skin diseases can elicit inflammation in the brain, leading to depressive symptoms. Certain subsets of cytokines that mediate inflammatory pathways were associated with both cutaneous inflammation and depression, highlighting shared pathology. Antiinflammatory medications targeting shared cytokines found reductions in both cutaneous and depressive symptoms. Practitioners have emphasized interdisciplinary approaches to treating both conditions, including psychotherapy and pharmacological methods. There is a clear association between inflammatory cutaneous diseases and depression. Co-management of these conditions, including interdisciplinary methods, is essential for patients’ well-being. Future research addressing similar links between other cutaneous and psychiatric conditions could yield new treatment opportunities as well.
{"title":"Role of Inflammation and Cytokine Dysregulation in Depression in Patients with Inflammatory Skin Conditions","authors":"Olivia M. Katamanin, Isabella J. Tan, Jillian Barry, Mohammad Jafferany","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00905-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00905-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing field of psychodermatology examines the interplay between dermatological and psychiatric comorbidities. While current literature recognizes that cutaneous and psychiatric conditions often coexist within patients, the relationship between dysregulated inflammation and depression in patients with inflammatory skin conditions has not been thoroughly explored. This review seeks to describe the connection between cutaneous disease and depression via shared inflammatory cytokine pathways. A review of current literature was conducted, and studies addressing the co-occurrence of depression and inflammatory skin diseases were included. This review focuses on depression in patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. Studies that focused on the prevalence of depression in these populations, shared inflammatory pathways, and co-management of cutaneous and psychiatric disorders were chosen. The literature revealed a high prevalence of depression in individuals with inflammatory skin conditions compared with those without cutaneous disease. Recent studies described how proinflammatory cytokines in inflammatory skin diseases can elicit inflammation in the brain, leading to depressive symptoms. Certain subsets of cytokines that mediate inflammatory pathways were associated with both cutaneous inflammation and depression, highlighting shared pathology. Antiinflammatory medications targeting shared cytokines found reductions in both cutaneous and depressive symptoms. Practitioners have emphasized interdisciplinary approaches to treating both conditions, including psychotherapy and pharmacological methods. There is a clear association between inflammatory cutaneous diseases and depression. Co-management of these conditions, including interdisciplinary methods, is essential for patients’ well-being. Future research addressing similar links between other cutaneous and psychiatric conditions could yield new treatment opportunities as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"35 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142765704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00908-6
Parnia Behinaein, Katherine Gavagan, Jacob Waitzman, Aunna Pourang, Geoffrey Potts
Secondary hyperhidrosis is a multifactorial condition that poses unique diagnostic and management challenges. Distinguishing secondary from primary hyperhidrosis remains difficult due to overlapping symptoms. This review consolidates existing evidence on the numerous underlying causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms of secondary hyperhidrosis across various disciplines. Secondary hyperhidrosis typically manifests in the fourth decade of life or later, whereas primary hyperhidrosis usually begins earlier. Generalized hyperhidrosis often suggests a secondary cause, though the distribution can vary, including focal symmetric/asymmetric or regional patterns depending on the underlying condition. Key clinical features such as lack of family history and associated symptoms provide additional clues favoring a secondary etiology. Recognizing these distinct characteristics is crucial for accurate differentiation between secondary and primary hyperhidrosis, thereby guiding appropriate evaluation and management of the underlying cause.
{"title":"A Review of the Etiologies and Key Clinical Features of Secondary Hyperhidrosis","authors":"Parnia Behinaein, Katherine Gavagan, Jacob Waitzman, Aunna Pourang, Geoffrey Potts","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00908-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00908-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Secondary hyperhidrosis is a multifactorial condition that poses unique diagnostic and management challenges. Distinguishing secondary from primary hyperhidrosis remains difficult due to overlapping symptoms. This review consolidates existing evidence on the numerous underlying causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms of secondary hyperhidrosis across various disciplines. Secondary hyperhidrosis typically manifests in the fourth decade of life or later, whereas primary hyperhidrosis usually begins earlier. Generalized hyperhidrosis often suggests a secondary cause, though the distribution can vary, including focal symmetric/asymmetric or regional patterns depending on the underlying condition. Key clinical features such as lack of family history and associated symptoms provide additional clues favoring a secondary etiology. Recognizing these distinct characteristics is crucial for accurate differentiation between secondary and primary hyperhidrosis, thereby guiding appropriate evaluation and management of the underlying cause.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"97 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00900-0
Alexandra Dobre, Roxana-Ioana Nedelcu, Gabriela Turcu, Alice Brinzea, Irina Struna, Gabriela Tudorache, Alen Ali, Ionela Hulea, Elena Balasescu, Tudor Emanuel Fertig, Mihaela Gherghiceanu, Catherine Harwood, Daniela Adriana Ion, Ana-Maria Forsea
Keratoacanthoma (KA) is a relatively common, fast-growing epithelial tumour, with characteristic behaviour and clinical variability. Although it appears as a solitary lesion in a majority of cases, multiple KAs do occur, secondary to skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation, chemical carcinogens or certain medications, but may also be associated with various genetic syndromes. Thus, multiple KAs may serve as an early clinical alarm sign. Prompt diagnosis of the underlying cause and identification of the mechanism of development are critical for the secondary prevention of associated organ disorders or neoplasias, the improvement of patient quality of life and familial counselling. Although research in this field has seen important progress in the last few years, there are still many pathogenic processes that have not been elucidated. Additionally, the literature on this topic is limited to individual case reports and small case series, making it difficult for clinicians to parse available data and select the essential information. Therefore, this work aims to review current knowledge, summarizing existing studies, with focus on multiple KAs associated with genetic syndromes, and proposes a diagnostic algorithm for these rare cases to help guide clinicians in their practice. Lastly, we aim to highlight the main gaps in understanding the underlying mechanisms and suggest further research avenues.