Pub Date : 2024-05-16DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00867-y
Nicole Cherepacha, Frances St George-Hyslop, Bindiya Chugani, Yousef Alabdeen, Luis F. Sanchez-Espino, Quenby Mahood, Cathryn Sibbald, Ruud H. J. Verstegen
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) is known to cause mortality and long-term sequelae in the pediatric population, however there are no established clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric DReSS. We conducted a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the currently available data on treatment, mortality, and long-term sequelae of DReSS in children (aged 0–18 years). Data from 644 individuals revealed that various treatment strategies are being used in the management of pediatric DReSS, and strategies were often used in combination. The diversity in treatment approaches cannot be solely attributed to age or disease severity and reflects the lack of evidence-based management guidelines for DReSS. Children are also at risk of developing autoimmune sequelae following DReSS, most commonly thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus. We found that the eventual development of autoimmune disease was more often associated with DReSS caused by antibiotics, especially minocycline and sulfamethoxazole, in comparison with individuals who did not develop sequelae. In this study, we identify strengths and weaknesses in the currently available literature and highlight that future prospective studies with structured and long-term follow-up of children with DReSS are needed to better understand potential risk factors for mortality and development of sequelae after DReSS.
{"title":"Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS) in Children: A Scoping Review","authors":"Nicole Cherepacha, Frances St George-Hyslop, Bindiya Chugani, Yousef Alabdeen, Luis F. Sanchez-Espino, Quenby Mahood, Cathryn Sibbald, Ruud H. J. Verstegen","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00867-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00867-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) is known to cause mortality and long-term sequelae in the pediatric population, however there are no established clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric DReSS. We conducted a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the currently available data on treatment, mortality, and long-term sequelae of DReSS in children (aged 0–18 years). Data from 644 individuals revealed that various treatment strategies are being used in the management of pediatric DReSS, and strategies were often used in combination. The diversity in treatment approaches cannot be solely attributed to age or disease severity and reflects the lack of evidence-based management guidelines for DReSS. Children are also at risk of developing autoimmune sequelae following DReSS, most commonly thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus. We found that the eventual development of autoimmune disease was more often associated with DReSS caused by antibiotics, especially minocycline and sulfamethoxazole, in comparison with individuals who did not develop sequelae. In this study, we identify strengths and weaknesses in the currently available literature and highlight that future prospective studies with structured and long-term follow-up of children with DReSS are needed to better understand potential risk factors for mortality and development of sequelae after DReSS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"609 - 621"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140954811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00857-0
Francesco Bellinato, Martina Maurelli, Davide Geat, Giampiero Girolomoni, Paolo Gisondi
Epidemiological data demonstrate strong associations between psoriasis and metabolic comorbidities, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The presence of metabolic comorbidities significantly influences the selection and effectiveness of pharmacological treatments. Some drugs should be prescribed with caution in patients with metabolic comorbidities because of an increased risk of adverse events, while others could have a reduced effectiveness. The aim of this narrative review is to highlight the challenges that healthcare professionals may face regarding the management of psoriasis in patients with metabolic comorbidities. In the first part of the article, the epidemiological association between psoriasis and metabolic comorbidities and their pathogenetic mechanisms is summarized. The second part describes the efficacy and safety profile of conventional and biologic drugs in patients with selected metabolic comorbidities including obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/hepatic steatosis, and diabetes. Finally, the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, such as diet, alcohol abstinence, physical activity, and smoking avoidance is discussed. In conclusion, the choice of the best approach to manage patients with psoriasis with metabolic comorbidities should encompass both tailored pharmacological and individualized non-pharmacological interventions.
{"title":"Managing the Patient with Psoriasis and Metabolic Comorbidities","authors":"Francesco Bellinato, Martina Maurelli, Davide Geat, Giampiero Girolomoni, Paolo Gisondi","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00857-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00857-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Epidemiological data demonstrate strong associations between psoriasis and metabolic comorbidities, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The presence of metabolic comorbidities significantly influences the selection and effectiveness of pharmacological treatments. Some drugs should be prescribed with caution in patients with metabolic comorbidities because of an increased risk of adverse events, while others could have a reduced effectiveness. The aim of this narrative review is to highlight the challenges that healthcare professionals may face regarding the management of psoriasis in patients with metabolic comorbidities. In the first part of the article, the epidemiological association between psoriasis and metabolic comorbidities and their pathogenetic mechanisms is summarized. The second part describes the efficacy and safety profile of conventional and biologic drugs in patients with selected metabolic comorbidities including obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/hepatic steatosis, and diabetes. Finally, the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, such as diet, alcohol abstinence, physical activity, and smoking avoidance is discussed. In conclusion, the choice of the best approach to manage patients with psoriasis with metabolic comorbidities should encompass both tailored pharmacological and individualized non-pharmacological interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"527 - 540"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140920743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-14DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00865-0
Sarah L. Becker, Shannon Kody, Nicole M. Fett, Alexander Hines, Afsaneh Alavi, Alex G. Ortega-Loayza
The heterogeneity of atypical wounds can present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, as the prevalence of atypical wounds grows worldwide, prompt and accurate management is increasingly an essential skill for dermatologists. Addressing the underlying cause of an atypical wound is critical for successful outcomes. An integrated approach with a focus on pain management and patient engagement is recommended to facilitate enduring wound closure. Advances in treatment, in addition to further research and clinical training, are necessary to address the expanding burden of atypical wounds.
{"title":"Approach to the Atypical Wound","authors":"Sarah L. Becker, Shannon Kody, Nicole M. Fett, Alexander Hines, Afsaneh Alavi, Alex G. Ortega-Loayza","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00865-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00865-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The heterogeneity of atypical wounds can present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, as the prevalence of atypical wounds grows worldwide, prompt and accurate management is increasingly an essential skill for dermatologists. Addressing the underlying cause of an atypical wound is critical for successful outcomes. An integrated approach with a focus on pain management and patient engagement is recommended to facilitate enduring wound closure. Advances in treatment, in addition to further research and clinical training, are necessary to address the expanding burden of atypical wounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"559 - 584"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140920737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-14DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00859-y
Amy S. Paller, Elaine C. Siegfried, Eric L. Simpson, Michael J. Cork, Robert Sidbury, Iris H. Chen, Faisal A. Khokhar, Jing Xiao, Ariane Dubost-Brama, Ashish Bansal
Background
Pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often experience a high disease burden and have a high risk of persistent disease. Standard-of-care immunosuppressive systemic treatments have been used off-label for AD in pediatric patients despite concerns for suboptimal safety with continuous use and risk of relapse upon discontinuation. The biologic agent dupilumab is the first systemic treatment approved for moderate-to-severe AD in children as young as 6 months. Long-term safety and efficacy data in this patient population are needed to inform continuous AD management.
Objectives
The purpose of this work was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment up to 1 year in an open-label extension (OLE) study [LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (NCT02612454)] in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who previously participated in the 16-week, double-blind, phase 3 LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434 part B; parent study) and were subsequently enrolled in PED-OLE.
Methods
In PED-OLE, patients received dupilumab every 4 weeks according to a weight-tiered regimen (body weight ≥ 5 kg to < 15 kg: 200 mg; ≥ 15 kg to < 30 kg: 300 mg).
Results
Data for 142 patients were analyzed, 60 of whom had completed the 52-week visit at time of database lock. Mean age at baseline was 4.1 y [SD, 1.13; range, 1.0–5.9 years]. A majority (78.2%) of patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most of which were mild or moderate and transient. The most frequently reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (19.7%), cough (15.5%), and pyrexia (14.1%). One TEAE led to treatment discontinuation (severe urticaria, which resolved in 1 day). By week 52, 36.2% of patients had achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear skin), and 96.6%, 79.3%, and 58.6% had at least 50%, 75%, or 90% improvement, respectively, in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores.
Conclusions
Consistent with results seen in adults, adolescents, and older children (aged 6–11 years), treatment with dupilumab for up to 1 year in children aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD demonstrated an acceptable long-term safety profile and sustained efficacy. These results support the long-term continuous use of dupilumab in this patient population.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02612454 and NCT03346434 (part B).
背景:患有中度至重度特应性皮炎(AD)的儿童患者通常疾病负担较重,且病情持续存在的风险较高。尽管存在持续使用安全性不佳和停药后复发风险的问题,但标准的免疫抑制系统治疗一直被用于儿童特应性皮炎的标示外治疗。生物制剂 dupilumab 是首个获准用于 6 个月大儿童中度至重度 AD 的全身治疗药物。我们需要这一患者群体的长期安全性和疗效数据,以便为持续性 AD 管理提供依据:这项工作的目的是在一项开放标签扩展(OLE)研究[LIBERTY AD PED-OLE(NCT02612454)]中,确定6个月至5岁中重度AD儿童接受长达1年的dupilumab治疗的长期安全性和疗效,这些儿童之前参加了为期16周的双盲3期LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL试验(NCT03346434 B部分;母研究),随后被纳入PED-OLE:在PED-OLE中,患者按照体重阶梯疗法(体重≥5 kg至<15 kg:200 mg;≥15 kg至<30 kg:300 mg)每4周接受一次dupilumab治疗:对142名患者的数据进行了分析,其中60名患者在数据库锁定时已完成52周的访问。基线时的平均年龄为 4.1 岁 [SD, 1.13; range, 1.0-5.9 years]。大多数患者(78.2%)报告了≥1次治疗突发不良事件(TEAE),其中大多数为轻度或中度,且为一过性。最常报告的 TEAE 为鼻咽炎(19.7%)、咳嗽(15.5%)和发热(14.1%)。有 1 例 TEAE 导致停药(严重荨麻疹,1 天后缓解)。到第52周时,36.2%的患者的研究者总体评估得分达到0/1(皮肤清澈/几乎清澈),96.6%、79.3%和58.6%的患者的湿疹面积和严重程度指数得分分别至少改善了50%、75%或90%:与在成人、青少年和年龄较大的儿童(6-11 岁)身上看到的结果一致,对于 6 个月至 5 岁中度至重度 AD 控制不佳的儿童,使用杜比单抗长达 1 年的治疗显示出了可接受的长期安全性和持续疗效。这些结果支持在这一患者群体中长期持续使用dupilumab:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers:NCT02612454 和 NCT03346434(B 部分)。
{"title":"Dupilumab Safety and Efficacy up to 1 Year in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years with Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Phase 3 Open-Label Extension Study","authors":"Amy S. Paller, Elaine C. Siegfried, Eric L. Simpson, Michael J. Cork, Robert Sidbury, Iris H. Chen, Faisal A. Khokhar, Jing Xiao, Ariane Dubost-Brama, Ashish Bansal","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00859-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00859-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often experience a high disease burden and have a high risk of persistent disease. Standard-of-care immunosuppressive systemic treatments have been used off-label for AD in pediatric patients despite concerns for suboptimal safety with continuous use and risk of relapse upon discontinuation. The biologic agent dupilumab is the first systemic treatment approved for moderate-to-severe AD in children as young as 6 months. Long-term safety and efficacy data in this patient population are needed to inform continuous AD management.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this work was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment up to 1 year in an open-label extension (OLE) study [LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (NCT02612454)] in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who previously participated in the 16-week, double-blind, phase 3 LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434 part B; parent study) and were subsequently enrolled in PED-OLE.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In PED-OLE, patients received dupilumab every 4 weeks according to a weight-tiered regimen (body weight ≥ 5 kg to < 15 kg: 200 mg; ≥ 15 kg to < 30 kg: 300 mg).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Data for 142 patients were analyzed, 60 of whom had completed the 52-week visit at time of database lock. Mean age at baseline was 4.1 y [SD, 1.13; range, 1.0–5.9 years]. A majority (78.2%) of patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most of which were mild or moderate and transient. The most frequently reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (19.7%), cough (15.5%), and pyrexia (14.1%). One TEAE led to treatment discontinuation (severe urticaria, which resolved in 1 day). By week 52, 36.2% of patients had achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear skin), and 96.6%, 79.3%, and 58.6% had at least 50%, 75%, or 90% improvement, respectively, in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consistent with results seen in adults, adolescents, and older children (aged 6–11 years), treatment with dupilumab for up to 1 year in children aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD demonstrated an acceptable long-term safety profile and sustained efficacy. These results support the long-term continuous use of dupilumab in this patient population.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02612454 and NCT03346434 (part B).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"655 - 668"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193700/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140920741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2
Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Eric L. Simpson, Kim Papp, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Andrew Blauvelt, Leon Kircik, Jonathan I. Silverberg, Elaine C. Siegfried, Michael E. Kuligowski, May E. Venturanza, Howard Kallender, Haobo Ren, Amy S. Paller
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2).</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12–17 years from pooled phase 3 study data.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigator’s Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3–20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12–17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [− 0.9 (1.9) versus −0.2 (1.4); <i>P</i> = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib crea
{"title":"Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies","authors":"Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Eric L. Simpson, Kim Papp, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Andrew Blauvelt, Leon Kircik, Jonathan I. Silverberg, Elaine C. Siegfried, Michael E. Kuligowski, May E. Venturanza, Howard Kallender, Haobo Ren, Amy S. Paller","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2).</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12–17 years from pooled phase 3 study data.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigator’s Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3–20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12–17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [− 0.9 (1.9) versus −0.2 (1.4); <i>P</i> = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib crea","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"669 - 683"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00860-5
Kathy A. Fraser
{"title":"American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting: San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2024","authors":"Kathy A. Fraser","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00860-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00860-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 3","pages":"509 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140652110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-22DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00858-z
Jürgen C. Becker, Andreas Stang, David Schrama, Selma Ugurel
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation. Its carcinogenesis is based either on the integration of the Merkel cell polyomavirus or on ultraviolet (UV) mutagenesis, both of which lead to high immunogenicity either through the expression of viral proteins or neoantigens. Despite this immunogenicity resulting from viral or UV-associated carcinogenesis, it exhibits highly aggressive behavior. However, owing to the rarity of MCC and the lack of epidemiologic registries with detailed clinical data, there is some uncertainty regarding the spontaneous course of the disease. Historically, advanced MCC patients were treated with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy yielding a median response duration of only 3 months. Starting in 2017, four programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors—avelumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab (utilized in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings), and retifanlimab—have demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with disseminated MCC on the basis of prospective clinical trials. However, generating clinical evidence for rare cancers, such as MCC, is challenging owing to difficulties in conducting large-scale trials, resulting in small sample sizes and therefore lacking statistical power. Thus, to comprehensively understand the available clinical evidence on various immunotherapy approaches for MCC, we also delve into the epidemiology and immune biology of this cancer. Nevertheless, while randomized studies directly comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in MCC are lacking, immunotherapy shows response rates comparable to those previously reported with chemotherapy but with more enduring responses. Notably, adjuvant nivolumab has proven superiority to the standard-of-care therapy (observation) in the adjuvant setting.
{"title":"Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Integrating Epidemiology, Immunology, and Therapeutic Updates","authors":"Jürgen C. Becker, Andreas Stang, David Schrama, Selma Ugurel","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00858-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00858-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation. Its carcinogenesis is based either on the integration of the Merkel cell polyomavirus or on ultraviolet (UV) mutagenesis, both of which lead to high immunogenicity either through the expression of viral proteins or neoantigens. Despite this immunogenicity resulting from viral or UV-associated carcinogenesis, it exhibits highly aggressive behavior. However, owing to the rarity of MCC and the lack of epidemiologic registries with detailed clinical data, there is some uncertainty regarding the spontaneous course of the disease. Historically, advanced MCC patients were treated with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy yielding a median response duration of only 3 months. Starting in 2017, four programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors—avelumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab (utilized in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings), and retifanlimab—have demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with disseminated MCC on the basis of prospective clinical trials. However, generating clinical evidence for rare cancers, such as MCC, is challenging owing to difficulties in conducting large-scale trials, resulting in small sample sizes and therefore lacking statistical power. Thus, to comprehensively understand the available clinical evidence on various immunotherapy approaches for MCC, we also delve into the epidemiology and immune biology of this cancer. Nevertheless, while randomized studies directly comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in MCC are lacking, immunotherapy shows response rates comparable to those previously reported with chemotherapy but with more enduring responses. Notably, adjuvant nivolumab has proven superiority to the standard-of-care therapy (observation) in the adjuvant setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"541 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40257-024-00858-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140803011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00862-3
Zhao Feng Liu, Amy Sylivris, Johnny Wu, Darren Tan, Samuel Hong, Lawrence Lin, Michael Wang, Christopher Chew
Background
Ultrasound surveillance has become the new standard of care in stage III melanoma after the 2017 Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) demonstrated non-inferior 3-year survival compared with complete lymph node dissection.
Objective
We aimed to quantify diagnostic performance and adherence rates of ultrasound surveillance for melanoma locoregional metastasis, offering insights into real-world applicability.
Methods
Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until 11 October 2023. All primary studies that reported data on the diagnostic performance or adherence rates to ultrasound surveillance in melanoma were included. R statistical software was used for data synthesis and analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were aggregated across studies using the meta-analytic method for diagnostic tests outlined by Rutter and Gatsonis. Adherence rates were calculated as the ratio of patients fully compliant to planned follow-up to those who were not.
Results
A total of 36 studies including 18,273 patients were analysed, with a mean age of 56.6 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.11. The median follow-up duration and frequency was 36 and 4 months, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of ultrasound examination was 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.878–0.879) and specificity was 0.969 (95% CI 0.968–0.970), representing a diagnostic odds ratio of 224.5 (95% CI 223.1–225.9). Ultrasound examination demonstrated a substantial improvement in absolute sensitivity over clinical examination alone, with a number needed to screen (NNS) of 2.95. The overall adherence rate was 77.0% (95% CI 76.0–78.1%), with significantly lower rates in the United States [US] (p < 0.001) and retrospective studies (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Ultrasound is a powerful diagnostic tool for locoregional melanoma metastasis. However, the real applicability to surveillance programmes is limited by low adherence rates, especially in the US. Further studies should seek to address this adherence gap.
背景2017年多中心选择性淋巴结切除术试验II(MSLT-II)显示,与完全淋巴结清扫术相比,超声监测的3年生存率并不劣于完全淋巴结清扫术,因此超声监测已成为III期黑色素瘤治疗的新标准。方法 根据系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们系统检索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中从开始到 2023 年 10 月 11 日的所有研究。纳入了所有报告黑色素瘤超声监测诊断效果或坚持率数据的主要研究。使用 R 统计软件进行数据综合与分析。采用 Rutter 和 Gatsonis 概述的诊断测试荟萃分析方法对各研究的敏感性和特异性进行汇总。坚持率按完全按计划随访的患者与未按计划随访的患者之比计算。结果 共分析了 36 项研究,包括 18 273 名患者,平均年龄为 56.6 岁,男女比例为 1:1.11。随访时间和次数的中位数分别为 36 个月和 4 个月。超声检查的汇总灵敏度为 0.879(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.878-0.879),特异性为 0.969(95% CI 0.968-0.970),诊断几率比为 224.5(95% CI 223.1-225.9)。与单纯的临床检查相比,超声检查大大提高了绝对灵敏度,筛查所需人数(NNS)为 2.95。总体坚持率为 77.0%(95% CI 76.0-78.1%),美国(US)和回顾性研究(P< 0.001)的坚持率明显较低(P< 0.001)。结论超声波是局部黑色素瘤转移的强大诊断工具,但由于使用率较低,特别是在美国,其在监测计划中的实际应用受到了限制。进一步的研究应设法解决这一问题。
{"title":"Ultrasound Surveillance in Melanoma Management: Bridging Diagnostic Promise with Real-World Adherence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Zhao Feng Liu, Amy Sylivris, Johnny Wu, Darren Tan, Samuel Hong, Lawrence Lin, Michael Wang, Christopher Chew","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00862-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00862-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ultrasound surveillance has become the new standard of care in stage III melanoma after the 2017 Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) demonstrated non-inferior 3-year survival compared with complete lymph node dissection.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to quantify diagnostic performance and adherence rates of ultrasound surveillance for melanoma locoregional metastasis, offering insights into real-world applicability.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p> Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until 11 October 2023. All primary studies that reported data on the diagnostic performance or adherence rates to ultrasound surveillance in melanoma were included. R statistical software was used for data synthesis and analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were aggregated across studies using the meta-analytic method for diagnostic tests outlined by Rutter and Gatsonis. Adherence rates were calculated as the ratio of patients fully compliant to planned follow-up to those who were not.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 36 studies including 18,273 patients were analysed, with a mean age of 56.6 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.11. The median follow-up duration and frequency was 36 and 4 months, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of ultrasound examination was 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.878–0.879) and specificity was 0.969 (95% CI 0.968–0.970), representing a diagnostic odds ratio of 224.5 (95% CI 223.1–225.9). Ultrasound examination demonstrated a substantial improvement in absolute sensitivity over clinical examination alone, with a number needed to screen (NNS) of 2.95. The overall adherence rate was 77.0% (95% CI 76.0–78.1%), with significantly lower rates in the United States [US] (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and retrospective studies (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ultrasound is a powerful diagnostic tool for locoregional melanoma metastasis. However, the real applicability to surveillance programmes is limited by low adherence rates, especially in the US. Further studies should seek to address this adherence gap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"513 - 525"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140629942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Secondary bacterial infections of common dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis, ectoparasitosis, and varicella zoster virus infections are frequent, with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes being the bacteria most involved. There are also Gram-negative infections secondary to common dermatoses such as foot dyshidrotic eczema and tinea pedis. Factors favoring secondary bacterial infections in atopic dermatitis, ectoparasitosis, and varicella zoster virus infections mainly include an epidermal barrier alteration as well as itch. Mite-bacteria interaction is also involved in scabies and some environmental factors can promote Gram-negative bacterial infections of the feet. Furthermore, the bacterial ecology of these superinfections may depend on the geographical origin of the patients, especially in ectoparasitosis. Bacterial superinfections can also have different clinical aspects depending on the underlying dermatoses. Subsequently, the choice of class, course, and duration of antibiotic treatment depends on the severity of the infection and the suspected bacteria, primarily targeting S. aureus. Prevention of these secondary bacterial infections depends first and foremost on the management of the underlying skin disorder. At the same time, educating the patient on maintaining good skin hygiene and reporting changes in the primary lesions is crucial. In the case of recurrent secondary infections, decolonization of S. aureus is deemed necessary, particularly in atopic dermatitis.
{"title":"Secondary Bacterial Infections in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis or Other Common Dermatoses","authors":"Romain Salle, Pascal Del Giudice, Charbel Skayem, Camille Hua, Olivier Chosidow","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00856-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00856-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Secondary bacterial infections of common dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis, ectoparasitosis, and varicella zoster virus infections are frequent, with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> being the bacteria most involved. There are also Gram-negative infections secondary to common dermatoses such as foot dyshidrotic eczema and tinea pedis. Factors favoring secondary bacterial infections in atopic dermatitis, ectoparasitosis, and varicella zoster virus infections mainly include an epidermal barrier alteration as well as itch. Mite-bacteria interaction is also involved in scabies and some environmental factors can promote Gram-negative bacterial infections of the feet. Furthermore, the bacterial ecology of these superinfections may depend on the geographical origin of the patients, especially in ectoparasitosis. Bacterial superinfections can also have different clinical aspects depending on the underlying dermatoses. Subsequently, the choice of class, course, and duration of antibiotic treatment depends on the severity of the infection and the suspected bacteria, primarily targeting <i>S. aureus</i>. Prevention of these secondary bacterial infections depends first and foremost on the management of the underlying skin disorder. At the same time, educating the patient on maintaining good skin hygiene and reporting changes in the primary lesions is crucial. In the case of recurrent secondary infections, decolonization of <i>S. aureus</i> is deemed necessary, particularly in atopic dermatitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 4","pages":"623 - 637"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140587422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4
Jonathan I. Silverberg, Melinda J. Gooderham, Amy S. Paller, Mette Deleuran, Christopher G. Bunick, Linda F. Stein Gold, DirkJan Hijnen, Brian M. Calimlim, Wan-Ju Lee, Henrique D. Teixeira, Xiaofei Hu, Shiyu Zhang, Yang Yang, Ayman Grada, Andrew M. Platt, Diamant Thaçi
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by increased itch, skin pain, poor sleep quality, and other symptoms that negatively affect patient quality of life. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, or tyrosine kinase 2, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from two phase III monotherapy trials of upadacitinib (Measure Up 1, NCT03569293; Measure Up 2, NCT03607422) were integrated. Changes in pruritus, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, mental health, and patient impression were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome assessments included the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment. Minimal clinically important differences, achievement of scores representing minimal disease burden, and the change from baseline were evaluated in patients who received upadacitinib through week 52 and in patients who received placebo through week 16.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This analysis included 1609 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, <i>N</i> = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, <i>N</i> = 567; placebo, <i>N</i> = 485). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across all arms. The proportion of patients treated with upadacitinib reporting improvements in itch increased rapidly by week 1, increased steadily through week 8, and was sustained through week 52. Patients receiving upadacitinib also experienced improvements in pain and other skin symptoms by week 1, which continued through week 16; improvements were maintained through week 52. Patient reports of improved sleep increased rapidly from baseline to week 1, increased steadily through week 32, and were sustained through week 52. Patients experienced quality-of-life improvements through week 8, which were maintained through week 52. By week 1, patients in both upadacitinib groups experienced rapid improvements in emotional state, and by week 12, patients also achieved meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression. Improvements in mental health continued steadily through week 32 and were maintained through week 52. Patients treated with upadacitinib 30 mg generally experienced improvements in patient-reported outcomes earlier than those treated with upadacitinib 15 mg. Through week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib experienced greater improvements versus those receiving placebo in all assessed patient-reported
背景:特应性皮炎是一种慢性炎症性疾病,其特点是瘙痒加剧、皮肤疼痛、睡眠质量差以及对患者生活质量产生负面影响的其他症状。乌达帕替尼是一种口服选择性Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂,对JAK1的抑制效力大于JAK2、JAK3或酪氨酸激酶2,已被批准用于治疗中度至重度特应性皮炎:我们旨在评估达达替尼对中重度特应性皮炎成人和青少年患者52周内患者报告结果的影响:我们整合了两项奥达替尼III期单药治疗试验(Measure Up 1,NCT03569293;Measure Up 2,NCT03607422)的数据。对瘙痒、疼痛、其他皮肤症状、睡眠、生活质量、心理健康和患者印象的变化进行了评估。患者报告的结果评估包括最严重瘙痒数字评分量表、以患者为导向的湿疹测量、皮肤科生活质量指数、特应性皮炎症状量表、特应性皮炎影响量表、医院焦虑和抑郁量表、SCORing 特应性皮炎指数、患者对严重程度的总体印象、患者对变化的总体印象以及患者对治疗的总体印象。评估了接受达达替尼治疗至第52周的患者和接受安慰剂治疗至第16周的患者的最小临床重要差异、达到代表最小疾病负担的评分以及与基线相比的变化:该分析包括1609名患者(达帕替尼15毫克,N = 557;达帕替尼30毫克,N = 567;安慰剂,N = 485)。所有治疗组的基线人口统计学和疾病特征基本相似。接受奥达帕替尼治疗的患者中,瘙痒症状有所改善的比例在第1周时迅速增加,在第8周时稳步上升,并持续到第52周。接受奥达替尼治疗的患者在第1周时疼痛和其他皮肤症状也有所改善,这种情况一直持续到第16周;这种改善一直维持到第52周。患者对睡眠改善的报告从基线到第1周迅速增加,在第32周稳步上升,并持续到第52周。患者的生活质量从第 8 周开始得到改善,并一直保持到第 52 周。到第1周时,两组达帕替尼患者的情绪状态都得到了迅速改善,到第12周时,患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪也得到了显著改善。心理健康状况的改善一直持续到第32周,并保持到第52周。与接受奥达替尼15毫克治疗的患者相比,接受奥达替尼30毫克治疗的患者通常更早出现患者报告结果的改善。在第16周,接受达达替尼治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,在所有评估的患者报告结果方面都有了更大的改善:结论:成人和青少年中重度特应性皮炎患者接受每天一次的奥达帕替尼15毫克或30毫克治疗后,在瘙痒、疼痛、其他皮肤症状、睡眠、生活质量和心理健康方面均有早期改善,并可持续到第52周:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03569293(2018年8月13日)和NCT03607422(2018年7月27日)。
{"title":"Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2)","authors":"Jonathan I. Silverberg, Melinda J. Gooderham, Amy S. Paller, Mette Deleuran, Christopher G. Bunick, Linda F. Stein Gold, DirkJan Hijnen, Brian M. Calimlim, Wan-Ju Lee, Henrique D. Teixeira, Xiaofei Hu, Shiyu Zhang, Yang Yang, Ayman Grada, Andrew M. Platt, Diamant Thaçi","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by increased itch, skin pain, poor sleep quality, and other symptoms that negatively affect patient quality of life. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, or tyrosine kinase 2, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from two phase III monotherapy trials of upadacitinib (Measure Up 1, NCT03569293; Measure Up 2, NCT03607422) were integrated. Changes in pruritus, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, mental health, and patient impression were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome assessments included the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment. Minimal clinically important differences, achievement of scores representing minimal disease burden, and the change from baseline were evaluated in patients who received upadacitinib through week 52 and in patients who received placebo through week 16.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This analysis included 1609 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, <i>N</i> = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, <i>N</i> = 567; placebo, <i>N</i> = 485). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across all arms. The proportion of patients treated with upadacitinib reporting improvements in itch increased rapidly by week 1, increased steadily through week 8, and was sustained through week 52. Patients receiving upadacitinib also experienced improvements in pain and other skin symptoms by week 1, which continued through week 16; improvements were maintained through week 52. Patient reports of improved sleep increased rapidly from baseline to week 1, increased steadily through week 32, and were sustained through week 52. Patients experienced quality-of-life improvements through week 8, which were maintained through week 52. By week 1, patients in both upadacitinib groups experienced rapid improvements in emotional state, and by week 12, patients also achieved meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression. Improvements in mental health continued steadily through week 32 and were maintained through week 52. Patients treated with upadacitinib 30 mg generally experienced improvements in patient-reported outcomes earlier than those treated with upadacitinib 15 mg. Through week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib experienced greater improvements versus those receiving placebo in all assessed patient-reported ","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 3","pages":"485 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140288060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}