Aleksander Aszkiełowicz, Cezary Kapłan, Patrycja Kapica, Rozalia Marszałek
Remimazolam is a novel, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has emerged as a promising agent in modern anesthetic and intensive care practice. This review pre-sents a detailed analysis of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy, and safety profile across various patient populations and procedural contexts. The drug's rapid metabolism by plasma esterases, minimal reliance on hepatic or renal function, and availability of a reversal agent (flumazenil) distinguish it from traditional sedatives such as propofol and midazolam. Clinical data support its utility in procedural sedation, general anesthesia, and ICU sedation, particularly in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Pediatric applications are discussed, highlighting the early evidence and dosing considerations. The review also compares remimazolam with other agents such as propofol and dexmedetomidine, underlining its advantages in cardiovascular stability and recovery profiles. While current results are encouraging, the article emphasizes the need for further research to establish standardized protocols and explore its long-term safety, especially in vulnerable populations.
{"title":"Remimazolam: a comprehensive review.","authors":"Aleksander Aszkiełowicz, Cezary Kapłan, Patrycja Kapica, Rozalia Marszałek","doi":"10.5114/ait/210611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/210611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remimazolam is a novel, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has emerged as a promising agent in modern anesthetic and intensive care practice. This review pre-sents a detailed analysis of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy, and safety profile across various patient populations and procedural contexts. The drug's rapid metabolism by plasma esterases, minimal reliance on hepatic or renal function, and availability of a reversal agent (flumazenil) distinguish it from traditional sedatives such as propofol and midazolam. Clinical data support its utility in procedural sedation, general anesthesia, and ICU sedation, particularly in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Pediatric applications are discussed, highlighting the early evidence and dosing considerations. The review also compares remimazolam with other agents such as propofol and dexmedetomidine, underlining its advantages in cardiovascular stability and recovery profiles. While current results are encouraging, the article emphasizes the need for further research to establish standardized protocols and explore its long-term safety, especially in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"257-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mostafa Somri, Feras Somri, Luis Gaitini, Anan Safadi, Ayoub Abd El Azim, Ibraheem Mafra, Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Introduction: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices, such as the laryngeal tube suction disposable (LTS-D) and i-gel, are widely used in pediatric anesthesia due to advantages such as improved sealing and gastric drainage. This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of the LTS-D and i-gel in non-paralyzed pediatric patients under general anesthesia.
Material and methods: Eighty ASA I children aged 2-8 years (12-25 kg), scheduled for short elective surgical procedures, were randomized to the LTS-D (n = 40) or i-gel (n = 40) group. Primary outcomes were oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂). Secondary outcomes included insertion time, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic view, tidal volumes (Vt), and adverse events.
Results: Both devices maintained comparable oxygenation. Mean EtCO₂ was slightly higher in the i-gel group, with a mean difference of 2.56 mmHg (95% CI: 1.86-3.26; P < 0.001). The i-gel had significantly faster insertion times (24.53 ± 2.00 s vs. 31.20 ± 1.95 s; P < 0.001) and superior fiberoptic visualization (optimal grades in 99% vs. 70%; P < 0.001). The LTS-D showed higher oropharyngeal leak pressures (37.63 ± 3.71 cmH₂O vs. 24.43 ± 1.72 cmH₂O; P < 0.001). Vt and adverse event rates were similar, with no severe complications reported (P = 0.65).
Conclusions: Both the LTS-D and i-gel are safe and effective for airway management in non-paralyzed children undergoing short procedures. The i-gel enables faster insertion and better anatomical positioning, while the LTS-D offers higher leak pressures, making it preferable when a better seal is needed. Device choice should be guided by clinical context and patient characteristics.
简介:第二代声门上气道装置,如喉管吸吸一次性(LTS-D)和i-gel,由于其改善了密封和胃引流等优点,被广泛应用于儿科麻醉。这项随机对照试验比较了LTS-D和i-gel在全麻下非瘫痪儿童患者中的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:80例2-8岁(12-25 kg)的ASA I型儿童,计划进行短期选择性手术,随机分为LTS-D组(n = 40)和I -gel组(n = 40)。主要指标为血氧饱和度(SpO₂)和末潮CO₂(EtCO₂)。次要结局包括插入时间、口咽漏压、光纤视图、潮气量(Vt)和不良事件。结果:两种设备维持了相当的氧合。i-gel组平均EtCO₂略高,平均差异为2.56 mmHg (95% CI: 1.86 ~ 3.26; P < 0.001)。i-gel具有明显更快的插入时间(24.53±2.00 s vs. 31.20±1.95 s, P < 0.001)和优越的光纤可视化(99% vs. 70%的最佳等级,P < 0.001)。LTS-D显示口咽漏压较高(37.63±3.71 cmH₂O vs. 24.43±1.72 cmH₂O; P < 0.001)。Vt和不良事件发生率相似,无严重并发症报告(P = 0.65)。结论:LTS-D和i-gel对于接受短期手术的非瘫痪儿童气道管理是安全有效的。i-gel可以实现更快的插入和更好的解剖定位,而LTS-D提供更高的泄漏压力,使其在需要更好的密封时更受欢迎。器械的选择应根据临床情况和患者特点进行指导。
{"title":"Comparison of LTS-D and i-gel in non-paralyzed pediatric patients under general anesthesia: a randomized trial.","authors":"Mostafa Somri, Feras Somri, Luis Gaitini, Anan Safadi, Ayoub Abd El Azim, Ibraheem Mafra, Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos","doi":"10.5114/ait/208942","DOIUrl":"10.5114/ait/208942","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Second-generation supraglottic airway devices, such as the laryngeal tube suction disposable (LTS-D) and i-gel, are widely used in pediatric anesthesia due to advantages such as improved sealing and gastric drainage. This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of the LTS-D and i-gel in non-paralyzed pediatric patients under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighty ASA I children aged 2-8 years (12-25 kg), scheduled for short elective surgical procedures, were randomized to the LTS-D (n = 40) or i-gel (n = 40) group. Primary outcomes were oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂). Secondary outcomes included insertion time, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic view, tidal volumes (Vt), and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both devices maintained comparable oxygenation. Mean EtCO₂ was slightly higher in the i-gel group, with a mean difference of 2.56 mmHg (95% CI: 1.86-3.26; P < 0.001). The i-gel had significantly faster insertion times (24.53 ± 2.00 s vs. 31.20 ± 1.95 s; P < 0.001) and superior fiberoptic visualization (optimal grades in 99% vs. 70%; P < 0.001). The LTS-D showed higher oropharyngeal leak pressures (37.63 ± 3.71 cmH₂O vs. 24.43 ± 1.72 cmH₂O; P < 0.001). Vt and adverse event rates were similar, with no severe complications reported (P = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the LTS-D and i-gel are safe and effective for airway management in non-paralyzed children undergoing short procedures. The i-gel enables faster insertion and better anatomical positioning, while the LTS-D offers higher leak pressures, making it preferable when a better seal is needed. Device choice should be guided by clinical context and patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"248-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manuel de la Matta, Minia Bastón-Castiñeiras, Daniel López-Herrera
Introduction: The effect of modifying the end inspiratory pause (EIP) on the variations in the physiological dead space (VDphys) in patients undergoing robotic surgery ventilated under a tailored open lung approach has not been addressed before.
Material and methods: This prospective-paired study was carried out in a tertiary hospital. Following an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre (ARM) and the application of a tailored open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPOL), participants consecutively received three EIP levels (30%, 40%, and 10%). The sequence was repeated after pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position and following a second ARM for patients with suspected lung collapse based on an Air test.
Results: Eighteen adult subjects were included. The use of an EIP of 10% was asso-ciated with a higher VDphys, both before pneumoperitoneum: 210 mL (IQR 200-237) vs. 197 mL (IQR 173-217) and 196.8 (IQR 185-218) with EIP 30% and 40%, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006) and after pneumoperitoneum: 212 mL (IQR 198-228) vs. 202 mL (IQR 181-213), P = 0.001. The application of ARMs and PEEPOL led to a significant reduction in driving pressure [5 cmH₂O (IQR 5-6) vs. 7 cmH₂O (IQR 6-10), P < 0.001], despite concurrent increases in PEEP [12 cmH₂O (IQR 10-13) vs. 5 cmH₂O, P < 0.001] and plateau pressure [17 cmH₂O (IQR 16-19) vs. 12 cmH₂O (IQR 12-15)].
Conclusions: The use of an EIP of 30-40% compared to 10% in patients undergoing robotic surgery optimises lung mechanics and minimises ventilation inefficiencies both before and during the establishment of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning.
导读:调整吸气末暂停(EIP)对机器人手术患者在量身定制的开放肺入路下通气时生理死腔(VDphys)变化的影响此前尚未得到解决。材料和方法:本前瞻性配对研究在某三级医院进行。在肺泡恢复操作(ARM)和量身定制的开放肺呼气末正压(PEEPOL)应用后,参与者连续接受三个EIP水平(30%,40%和10%)。在气腹和Trendelenburg体位后重复该顺序,并根据Air试验对疑似肺萎陷的患者进行第二次ARM。结果:纳入18名成人受试者。使用10%的EIP与较高的VDphys相关,气腹前:210 mL (IQR 200-237) vs 197 mL (IQR 173-217)和196.8 (IQR 185-218), EIP分别为30%和40% (P < 0.001和P = 0.006),气腹后:212 mL (IQR 198-228) vs 202 mL (IQR 181-213), P = 0.001。ARMs和PEEPOL的应用导致驾驶压力显著降低[5 cmH₂O (IQR 5-6) vs. 7 cmH₂O (IQR 6-10), P < 0.001],尽管同时增加了PEEP [12 cmH₂O (IQR 10-13) vs. 5 cmH₂O, P < 0.001]和平台压力[17 cmH₂O (IQR 16-19) vs. 12 cmH₂O (IQR 12-15)]。结论:与接受机器人手术的患者相比,使用30-40%的EIP优化了肺力学,并最大限度地减少了气腹和Trendelenburg定位之前和期间的通气效率低下。
{"title":"Influence of the end inspiratory pause on ventilatory efficiency and respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing robotic surgery under a tailored open lung approach: a prospective-paired study.","authors":"Manuel de la Matta, Minia Bastón-Castiñeiras, Daniel López-Herrera","doi":"10.5114/ait/209514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/209514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effect of modifying the end inspiratory pause (EIP) on the variations in the physiological dead space (VDphys) in patients undergoing robotic surgery ventilated under a tailored open lung approach has not been addressed before.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective-paired study was carried out in a tertiary hospital. Following an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre (ARM) and the application of a tailored open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPOL), participants consecutively received three EIP levels (30%, 40%, and 10%). The sequence was repeated after pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position and following a second ARM for patients with suspected lung collapse based on an Air test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen adult subjects were included. The use of an EIP of 10% was asso-ciated with a higher VDphys, both before pneumoperitoneum: 210 mL (IQR 200-237) vs. 197 mL (IQR 173-217) and 196.8 (IQR 185-218) with EIP 30% and 40%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.006) and after pneumoperitoneum: 212 mL (IQR 198-228) vs. 202 mL (IQR 181-213), <i>P</i> = 0.001. The application of ARMs and PEEPOL led to a significant reduction in driving pressure [5 cmH₂O (IQR 5-6) vs. 7 cmH₂O (IQR 6-10), <i>P</i> < 0.001], despite concurrent increases in PEEP [12 cmH₂O (IQR 10-13) vs. 5 cmH₂O, <i>P</i> < 0.001] and plateau pressure [17 cmH₂O (IQR 16-19) vs. 12 cmH₂O (IQR 12-15)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an EIP of 30-40% compared to 10% in patients undergoing robotic surgery optimises lung mechanics and minimises ventilation inefficiencies both before and during the establishment of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oliwia Doroba, Leszek Czupryniak, Filippo Sanfilippo, Paweł Andruszkiewicz, Mateusz Zawadka
An increasing number of patients treated with novel antidiabetic drugs, including glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, are presenting in the perioperative period. GLP-1RAs are known to delay gastric emptying, although current data remain preliminary and somewhat conflicting. SGLT2 inhibitors may be associated with euglycemic ketoacidosis in the perioperative period. To assess residual gastric content, gastric ultrasound may serve as a valuable tool in stratifying aspiration risk. Various recommendations are available for the perioperative management of patients on GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors. These are based largely on expert opinion and multi-society consensus. This review aims to summarise the key perioperative considerations related to these drug classes and to familiarise practitioners with their pharmacological profiles. We highlight their potential adverse effects and present current recommendations from professional organisations to support safe and effective perioperative management.
{"title":"New therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes: anaesthetic considerations. A narrative review.","authors":"Oliwia Doroba, Leszek Czupryniak, Filippo Sanfilippo, Paweł Andruszkiewicz, Mateusz Zawadka","doi":"10.5114/ait/208895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/208895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing number of patients treated with novel antidiabetic drugs, including glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, are presenting in the perioperative period. GLP-1RAs are known to delay gastric emptying, although current data remain preliminary and somewhat conflicting. SGLT2 inhibitors may be associated with euglycemic ketoacidosis in the perioperative period. To assess residual gastric content, gastric ultrasound may serve as a valuable tool in stratifying aspiration risk. Various recommendations are available for the perioperative management of patients on GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors. These are based largely on expert opinion and multi-society consensus. This review aims to summarise the key perioperative considerations related to these drug classes and to familiarise practitioners with their pharmacological profiles. We highlight their potential adverse effects and present current recommendations from professional organisations to support safe and effective perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"231-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcin Kołacz, Dariusz Kosson, Radosław Rzepliński, Kinga Olczyk-Miiller, Piotr Mieszczański, Ewa Puchalska-Kowalczyk, Grzegorz Cichowlas
Introduction: Neuropathic pain (NP) arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. Antidepressants (ADs) are recommended for the pharmacological treatment of NP. However, current guidelines do not specify how long ADs may be effective in NP treatment if the patient is benefiting from the therapy.
Material and methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study aiming to analyze the effectiveness of ADs in the treatment of NP by assessing the relationship between AD usage, the length of AD treatment and the intensity of pain in this group patients. Based on their pain intensity and length of treatment, the patients were divided into: three groups (NRS 0-3, NRS 4-6 and NRS ≥ 7), and six groups (< 1 month, 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years, and > 5 years), respectively.
Results: The study was conducted on a database from 421 patients, 231 (54.86%) of whom took antidepressants. We found that AD treatment significantly reduces the likelihood of being in the NRS 7-10 group compared to the NRS 0-3 group (OR = 0.611, 95% CI: 0.37-1.0, P = 0.05), and this reduction was observed up to 24 months of treatment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75, P < 0.004).
Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the study, the use of ADs in NP therapy may have a significant impact on reducing the occurrence of severe pain up to 24 months of therapy and should be included in pharmacotherapy in this group of patients.
{"title":"Effectiveness of antidepressants in neuropathic pain management: a retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Marcin Kołacz, Dariusz Kosson, Radosław Rzepliński, Kinga Olczyk-Miiller, Piotr Mieszczański, Ewa Puchalska-Kowalczyk, Grzegorz Cichowlas","doi":"10.5114/ait/208941","DOIUrl":"10.5114/ait/208941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropathic pain (NP) arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. Antidepressants (ADs) are recommended for the pharmacological treatment of NP. However, current guidelines do not specify how long ADs may be effective in NP treatment if the patient is benefiting from the therapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study aiming to analyze the effectiveness of ADs in the treatment of NP by assessing the relationship between AD usage, the length of AD treatment and the intensity of pain in this group patients. Based on their pain intensity and length of treatment, the patients were divided into: three groups (NRS 0-3, NRS 4-6 and NRS ≥ 7), and six groups (< 1 month, 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years, and > 5 years), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was conducted on a database from 421 patients, 231 (54.86%) of whom took antidepressants. We found that AD treatment significantly reduces the likelihood of being in the NRS 7-10 group compared to the NRS 0-3 group (OR = 0.611, 95% CI: 0.37-1.0,<i> P</i> = 0.05), and this reduction was observed up to 24 months of treatment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the limitations of the study, the use of ADs in NP therapy may have a significant impact on reducing the occurrence of severe pain up to 24 months of therapy and should be included in pharmacotherapy in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"226-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145073985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michal Kalina, Barbora Stadlerová, David Astapenko, Marcela Bílská, Vladimír Černý, Roman Škulec
Introduction: Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion is a common intervention, conventionally performed using visualization and palpation techniques. It has been reported that the first attempt success rate can be as low as 51%. Ultrasound guidance improves the overall success rate and the success rate of the first attempt. Therefore, we performed a randomized, prospective, clinical trial to compare two different techniques of PVC insertion in the setting of an operating theatre with a focus on the first attempt success rate.
Material and methods: This clinical trial allocated patients scheduled for elective surgery in general anaesthesia to undergo PVC cannulation with ultrasound guidance (Group A) or to undergo PVC cannulation without the use of ultrasound (Group B).
Results: A total of 613 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first cannulation attempt was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (Group A: 90.6%, Group B: 84.5%, P = 0.039). The overall success rate in both groups was 100%. The time needed to perform PVC cannulation was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (Group A: 406 ± 200 s, Group B: 301 ± 215 s, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: We found that ultrasound-guided PVC cannulation was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate than the conventional technique.
简介:外周静脉导管(PVC)插入是一种常见的干预措施,通常使用可视化和触诊技术进行。据报道,第一次尝试的成功率可低至51%。超声引导提高了整体成功率和首次尝试成功率。因此,我们进行了一项随机的、前瞻性的临床试验,以比较两种不同的PVC插入技术在手术室的设置,重点是第一次尝试的成功率。材料与方法:本临床试验将全麻择期手术患者分为超声引导下行PVC插管组(A组)和不超声引导下行PVC插管组(B组)。结果:共纳入613例成人患者。A组首次插管成功率明显高于B组(A组:90.6%,B组:84.5%,P = 0.039)。两组的总成功率均为100%。B组插管时间明显低于A组(A组:406±200 s, B组:301±215 s, P < 0.001)。结论:我们发现超声引导下的PVC插管比常规技术有更高的首次成功率。
{"title":"Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous cannulation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Michal Kalina, Barbora Stadlerová, David Astapenko, Marcela Bílská, Vladimír Černý, Roman Škulec","doi":"10.5114/ait/208286","DOIUrl":"10.5114/ait/208286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion is a common intervention, conventionally performed using visualization and palpation techniques. It has been reported that the first attempt success rate can be as low as 51%. Ultrasound guidance improves the overall success rate and the success rate of the first attempt. Therefore, we performed a randomized, prospective, clinical trial to compare two different techniques of PVC insertion in the setting of an operating theatre with a focus on the first attempt success rate.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This clinical trial allocated patients scheduled for elective surgery in general anaesthesia to undergo PVC cannulation with ultrasound guidance (Group A) or to undergo PVC cannulation without the use of ultrasound (Group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 613 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first cannulation attempt was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (Group A: 90.6%, Group B: 84.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.039). The overall success rate in both groups was 100%. The time needed to perform PVC cannulation was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (Group A: 406 ± 200 s, Group B: 301 ± 215 s, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that ultrasound-guided PVC cannulation was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate than the conventional technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"219-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francesca Gargano, Marco Fiore, Eleni McCaffery, Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessandro Ruggiero, Sabrina Migliorelli, Massimiliano Carassiti
{"title":"Regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for managing polytrauma surgically.","authors":"Francesca Gargano, Marco Fiore, Eleni McCaffery, Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessandro Ruggiero, Sabrina Migliorelli, Massimiliano Carassiti","doi":"10.5114/ait/208285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/208285","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"215-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Włodzimierz Płotek, Artur Bekała, Jadwiga Łuczak-Wawrzyniak, Katarzyna Dudzińska-Rapczewska, Małgorzata Gasińska-Błotniak, Marcin Cybulski, Agnieszka Kubik-Komar, Elżbieta Kubera, Maciej Wilczak, Wojciech Dąbrowski
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the neurocognitive safety of two schemes of general anesthesia based on propofol or sevoflurane applied to patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological operations, with a special focus on the patients' age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status/risk category I, II, or III, and levels of neuromarkers.
Material and methods: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was chosen for cognitive assessment. The potential neuroinjury after anesthesia and operation was assessed with a set of neuromarkers: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), tau protein (tau), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). The study was conducted on a group of women with no prior neurological or psychiatric diseases.
Results: A total of 61 patients (mean age 40.57 years) were included in the study (29 patients under propofol-based anesthesia [PBA], 32 patients under sevoflurane-based anesthesia [SBA]). The groups were demographically comparable. The patients in both groups exhibited a postoperative increase in the MoCA regardless of the type of anesthesia. The NFL and UCH-L1 levels increased significantly in both groups. The GFAP levels were significantly higher in the SBA group. Neither the age nor the increase in the neuromarkers influenced the patients' cognition.
Conclusions: The types of anesthesia applied in the laparoscopic gynecological operations resulted in a cognitively safe outcome despite detectable alterations in the neuromarkers.
{"title":"Is general anesthesia neuroinjury-free and safe for gynecological patients' cognition? A comparison of two typical anesthesia schemes based on propofol and sevoflurane.","authors":"Włodzimierz Płotek, Artur Bekała, Jadwiga Łuczak-Wawrzyniak, Katarzyna Dudzińska-Rapczewska, Małgorzata Gasińska-Błotniak, Marcin Cybulski, Agnieszka Kubik-Komar, Elżbieta Kubera, Maciej Wilczak, Wojciech Dąbrowski","doi":"10.5114/ait/208017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/208017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the neurocognitive safety of two schemes of general anesthesia based on propofol or sevoflurane applied to patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological operations, with a special focus on the patients' age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status/risk category I, II, or III, and levels of neuromarkers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was chosen for cognitive assessment. The potential neuroinjury after anesthesia and operation was assessed with a set of neuromarkers: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), tau protein (tau), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). The study was conducted on a group of women with no prior neurological or psychiatric diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients (mean age 40.57 years) were included in the study (29 patients under propofol-based anesthesia [PBA], 32 patients under sevoflurane-based anesthesia [SBA]). The groups were demographically comparable. The patients in both groups exhibited a postoperative increase in the MoCA regardless of the type of anesthesia. The NFL and UCH-L1 levels increased significantly in both groups. The GFAP levels were significantly higher in the SBA group. Neither the age nor the increase in the neuromarkers influenced the patients' cognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The types of anesthesia applied in the laparoscopic gynecological operations resulted in a cognitively safe outcome despite detectable alterations in the neuromarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"205-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tomasz Reysner, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Grzegorz Kowalski, Lukasz Lapaj, Przemyslaw Daroszewski, Małgorzata Reysner
Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe pain. We examined whether an ultrasound-guided, single-injection L2 erector spinae plane block could improve analgesia compared to an ultrasound-guided iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block with adductor canal block (ACB) in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia.
Material and methods: Ninety patients aged 65-89 years of both sexes (ASA I-III) scheduled for TKA were randomly allocated to receive iPACK block (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL) with ACB (ropivacaine 0.2%, 10 mL), lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL on each side), or to the control group. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first rescue opioid analgesia, quadriceps muscle strength, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet- to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).
Results: The total opioid consumption in 48 h was significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB group (mean ± SD) (3.0 ± 3.3) compared to L-ESPB (6.8 ± 3.8, P = 0.0442) and the control group (18.2 ± 4.0, P < 0.001). The time to first rescue opioid analgesia was longer in the iPACK+ACB (12.0 ± 1.9) compared to the L-ESPB (9.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) group and the control group (4.3 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). The pain scores, NLR, and PLR levels were significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB and L-ESPB groups than at all time points in the control group.
Conclusions: The iPACK+ACB is more effective than L-ESPB in pain management following TKA. iPACK+ACB and the L-ESPB lowered total opioid consumption and prolonged time to first opioid analgesia. NLR and PLR levels did not differ between the groups.
{"title":"iPACK block with adductor canal block vs. lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.","authors":"Tomasz Reysner, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Grzegorz Kowalski, Lukasz Lapaj, Przemyslaw Daroszewski, Małgorzata Reysner","doi":"10.5114/ait/208016","DOIUrl":"10.5114/ait/208016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe pain. We examined whether an ultrasound-guided, single-injection L2 erector spinae plane block could improve analgesia compared to an ultrasound-guided iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block with adductor canal block (ACB) in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety patients aged 65-89 years of both sexes (ASA I-III) scheduled for TKA were randomly allocated to receive iPACK block (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL) with ACB (ropivacaine 0.2%, 10 mL), lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL on each side), or to the control group. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first rescue opioid analgesia, quadriceps muscle strength, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet- to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total opioid consumption in 48 h was significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB group (mean ± SD) (3.0 ± 3.3) compared to L-ESPB (6.8 ± 3.8, <i>P</i> = 0.0442) and the control group (18.2 ± 4.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The time to first rescue opioid analgesia was longer in the iPACK+ACB (12.0 ± 1.9) compared to the L-ESPB (9.2 ± 1.9, <i>P</i> < 0.001) group and the control group (4.3 ± 1.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The pain scores, NLR, and PLR levels were significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB and L-ESPB groups than at all time points in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The iPACK+ACB is more effective than L-ESPB in pain management following TKA. iPACK+ACB and the L-ESPB lowered total opioid consumption and prolonged time to first opioid analgesia. NLR and PLR levels did not differ between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dorota Karkowska, Michał Modro, Tomasz Adam Karkowski
In Poland, epidural analgesia in labour is reimbursed from public funds by the National Health Fund, and yet many women are still unable to access it. The main factor limiting the accessibility of this procedure is the lack of an anaesthesiologist. Compared to other fields of medicine in which anaesthesiologists are involved, the needs of women giving birth are often marginalized and do not constitute a priority for the managers of medical entities. In 2022, 14% of births took place under analgesia, rising to 17% in 2023, and 23% in 2024. Despite the positive trend, still, on average, only one in four women can count on giving birth without unnecessary suffering. The aim of the article is to review the current legal ramifications of labour analgesia in terms of international, European, and Polish law.
{"title":"Advocating for universal access to epidural analgesia for women during childbirth: a scientific review Polish National Social Campaign \"Hear the voice of pain\".","authors":"Dorota Karkowska, Michał Modro, Tomasz Adam Karkowski","doi":"10.5114/ait/207671","DOIUrl":"10.5114/ait/207671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Poland, epidural analgesia in labour is reimbursed from public funds by the National Health Fund, and yet many women are still unable to access it. The main factor limiting the accessibility of this procedure is the lack of an anaesthesiologist. Compared to other fields of medicine in which anaesthesiologists are involved, the needs of women giving birth are often marginalized and do not constitute a priority for the managers of medical entities. In 2022, 14% of births took place under analgesia, rising to 17% in 2023, and 23% in 2024. Despite the positive trend, still, on average, only one in four women can count on giving birth without unnecessary suffering. The aim of the article is to review the current legal ramifications of labour analgesia in terms of international, European, and Polish law.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"174-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144740955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}