Anaesthesiology intensive therapy最新文献

Introduction: Recent years have seen an increasing number of elective total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Since a wide variety of methods and procedures are used in perioperative management, a survey-based study was carried out to identify the patterns of practice in Polish hospitals.

Material and methods: With the help of the LimeSurvey application, questionnaires for anaesthesio-logists and orthopaedists were prepared to gain insight into the preparation of patients for TKA and THA procedures and perioperative care. Questionnaires included both single and multiple-choice questions concerning among other things type of laboratory tests, additional examinations and consultations performed on a routine basis before elective TKA and THA procedures.

Results: A total of 162 medical centres took part in the study. Questionnaire responses were obtained from 93 (57%) orthopaedics teams and 112 (69%) anaesthesiology teams. A mean (standard deviation, SD) of 7.2 (3.5) laboratory tests are routinely ordered before surgery. For example, 47% of orthopaedists and 20% of anaesthesiologists order urinalysis, while 53% of orthopaedists and 26% of anaesthesiologists order a CRP test. Seventy-nine per cent of orthopaedists refer patients for at least one specialist consultation before the procedure. Dental consultation is requested by 40%, gynaecological consultation by 27%. Patient preoperative education is provided by 85% of orthopaedists and preoperative rehabilitation is prescribed by 46% of them. A total of 56% surveyed anaesthesiologists perform pre-anaesthetic evaluation upon patients' hospital admission.

Conclusions: The study found that the number of examinations and specialist consultations conducted in Polish hospitals exceeded the scope of recommendations of scientific societies. Furthermore, the authors identified a need to standardise perioperative management in the form of Polish guidelines or recommendations, with the intention to improve patient safety and optimize health care expenses.

Background: Guidelines and consensus statements recommend the use of videola-ryngoscopes (VLs) in airway management of patients with COVID-19. However, there is a lack of knowledge about which types of videolaryngoscopes are used, differences of use between countries, and how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced their use. The primary aim of this before-and-after cross-sectional survey study was to assess the frequency of the use of videolaryngoscopy in the operation theatres in different countries. Also, the preferred characteristics of videolaryngoscopes were assessed.

Methods: With Ethics Committee approval, a questionnaire was distributed among anaes-thesiologists through the European Airway Management Society's network in 2019 before and in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses to the questions were analysed and presented as descriptive statistics.

Results: We reached out to 791 anaesthesiologists; 155 (19.5%) returned the first questionnaire, and 91 (11.5%) returned the second survey. Videolaryngoscopes were used in 24.1% of cases before COVID-19 and in 43.1% after the pandemic ( P < 0.001). We revealed that the availability of videolaryngoscopes increased to 100% in all centres during the pandemic. Routine use of videolaryngoscopes in all cases increased from 12.5% to 38.9%. The type of videolaryngoscope and the blade preference did not change during this period ( P = 1.000).

Conclusions: This survey reflects that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the availability and use of videolaryngoscopes in operating theatres, and that more anaesthesiologists now use them routinely in all cases. The preferred type of VL or blade did not change during the pandemic.

Preoperative ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and the collapsi-bility index might identify patients with intravascular volume depletion. The purpose of this review was to gather the existing evidence to find out whether preoperative IVC ultrasound (IVCUS) derived parameters can reliably predict hypotension after spinal or general anaesthesia. PubMed was searched to identify research articles that addressed the role of IVC ultrasound in predicting hypotension after spinal and general anaesthesia in adult patients. We included 4 randomized control trials and 17 observational studies in our final review. Among these, 15 studies involved spinal anaesthesia and 6 studies involved general anaesthesia. Heterogeneity with respect to the patient populations under evaluation, definitions used for hypotension after anaesthesia, IVCUS assessment methods, and cut-off values for IVCUS-derived parameters to predict hypotension precluded pooled meta-analysis. The maximum and minimum reported sensitivity of the IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) for predicting post-spinal hypotension was 84.6% and 58.8% respectively, while the maximum and minimum specificities were 93.1% and 23.5% respectively. For the prediction of hypotension after general anaesthesia induction, the reported ranges of sensitivity and specificity of IVCCI were 86.67% to 45.5% and 94.29% to 77.27%, respectively. Current literature on the predictive role of IVCUS for hypotension after anaesthesia is heterogeneous both in methodology and in results. Standardization of the definition of hypotension under anaesthesia, method of IVCUS assessment, and the cut-offs for IVC diameter and the collapsibility index for prediction of hypotension after anaesthesia are necessary for drawing clinically relevant conclusions.

Introduction: Heart transplant recipients present unique perioperative challenges for surgery. Specifically, autonomic system denervation has significant implications for commonly used perioperative drugs. This study investigates neuromuscular blocking antagonists in this population when undergoing subsequent non-cardiac surgery.

Material and methods: A retrospective review was performed for the period 2015-2019 across our health care enterprise. Patients with previous orthotopic heart transplant and subsequent non-cardiac surgery were identified. A total of 185 patients were found, 67 receiving neostigmine (NEO) and 118 receiving sugammadex (SGX). Information of patient characteristics, prior heart transplant, and subsequent non-cardiac surgery was collected. Our primary outcome was the incidence of bradycardia (heart rate < 60 bpm) and/or hypotension (mean blood pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg) following neuromuscular blockade reversal. Secondary outcomes included need of intra-operative inotropic agents, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, hospital length of stay (hLOS), ICU admission, and death within 30 postoperative days.

Results: In unadjusted analysis, no significant differences were found between the two groups in change in heart rate [0 (-26, 14) vs. 1 (-19, 10), P = 0.59], change in MAP [0 (-22, 28) vs. 0 (-40, 47), P = 0.96], hLOS [2 days (1, 72) vs. 2 (0, 161), P = 0.92], or intraoperative hypotension [4 (6.0%) vs. 5 (4.2%), OR = 0.70, P = 0.60] for NEO and SGX respectively. After multivariable analysis, the results were similar for change in heart rate ( P = 0.59) and MAP ( P = 0.90).

Conclusions: No significant differences in the incidence of bradycardia and hypotension were found in the NEO versus SGX groups. NEO and SGX may have similar safety profiles in patients with prior heart transplant undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Introduction: Despite the recent use of serratus anterior plane (SAP) and pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks for pain management following breast surgery, there are insufficient data comparing their analgesic benefits. This study aimed to compare the quality of analgesia for PECS and SAP blocks in patients having modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

Material and methods: This trial enrolled 50 adult female patients scheduled for MRM under anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. After induction of anaesthesia, 25 patients received US-guided PECS II block, and 25 patients received US-guided SAP block. The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request. Secondary outcomes included the total analgesic consumption and postoperative pain during the first 24 hours as well as the total time to perform the block, surgeon satisfaction, haemodynamic parameters, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Results: Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the SAP group than in the PECS II block group (95% CI: 90.2-574.5, P = 0.009). The SAP block significantly lowered the total analgesics consumption, the 24 hours patient's need for analgesia, and the VAS scores immediately, as well as at 2, 8, 20, 22, and 24 hours postoperatively ( P < 0.005). Although it required a longer preparation time than PECS II block, the SAP block had comparable surgeons' satisfaction, haemodynamic parameters, and post-operative nausea and vomiting to PECS II block.

Conclusions: Following MRM, US-guided SAP block provided a delayed time to first rescue analgesia with better acute pain control and lower total analgesic consumption compared to the PECS II block.