Anaesthesiology intensive therapy最新文献

Introduction: The present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided triple nerve block (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral) versus unilateral subarachnoid block for adult male patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Material and methods: Sixty ASA I-III adult male patients > 18 years old, scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia surgery were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 patients each. In Group A ( n = 30) the patients received ultrasound-guided nerve block (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral), and in Group B ( n = 30) the patients received unilateral subarachnoid block. The primary outcome was to assess postoperative analgesic efficacy (visual analogue scale [VAS] scores at rest and during coughing/ambulation). The secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesia with morphine, the total dose of morphine used as rescue analgesia, urinary retention, time to first micturition, time to first unassisted walking, and time to discharge from the surgical recovery room.

Results: The mean pain scores at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during rest and during coughing/ambulation were significantly lower in Group A when compared to patients in Group B ( P < 0.001). There was no requirement for rescue analgesic opioids in Group A ( P < 0.001). Mean time to first micturition and mobilization occurred earlier in Group A, leading to early discharge from the recovery room ( P < 0.001). No major side effects were observed in any of the study groups.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided triple nerve block technique can be used as a sole anaesthetic technique for inguinal hernia surgery because it not only provides optimal anaesthesia intra-operatively but also has a favourable analgesic and opioid-sparing efficacy in the early postoperative period with minimal adverse effects.

Introduction: Although manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is gene-rally mild or asymptomatic, anaesthetic implications of the infection in children are still a matter of concern. Single reports suggest that patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at higher risk of anaesthetic complications.

Material and methods: We performed a retrospective, case control study analysing the risk of general anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2 infected children admitted to a tertiary paediatric university hospital for the purpose of urgent procedures requiring anaesthesia  between April 1st and September 30 th , 2021. The control group consisted of  SARS-CoV-2 negative children consecutively anaesthetised for the same reasons during the first month of observation. Our hypothesis was: general anaesthesia can be safely performed in SARS-CoV-2 infected children. Study endpoints: primary - anaesthetic respiratory complications (bronchospasm, laryngospasm, intraoperative desaturation below 94%, desaturation below 94% after awakening, unplanned postoperative mechanical ventilation); secondary - hospital length of stay, thrombotic, cardiac, haemorrhagic events, ICU admission, deaths during hospitalisation.

Results: The examined group consisted of 58 SARS-CoV-2 infected children, the matched control group of 198 patients. The rate of complications in both groups was very low, with no significant difference between the groups. The only differences observed were a higher frequency of desaturations in the awakening period and longer time of hospitalisation in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that physical status of the patient and duration of the procedure were the main factors influencing the risk of complications.

Conclusions: In our experience anaesthesia of SARS-CoV-2 infected children can be safely performed.

Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterised by loss of skeletal muscle mass, loss of muscle quality, and reduced muscle strength, resulting in low performance. Sarcopenia has been associated with increased mortality and complications after medical interventions. In daily clinical practice, sarcopenia is assessed by clinical assessment of muscle strength and performance tests and muscle mass quantification by dual-energy X-ray absorptio-metry (DXA) or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Assessment of the skeletal muscle quantity and quality obtained by abdominal computed tomography (CT) has gained interest in the medical community, as abdominal CT is performed for various medical reasons, and quantification of the psoas and skeletal muscle can be performed without additional radiation load and dye administration. The definitions of CT-derived skeletal muscle mass quantification are briefly reviewed: psoas muscle area (PMA), skeletal muscle area (SMA), and transverse psoas muscle thickness (TPMT). We explain how CT attenuation coefficient filters are used to determine PMA and SMA, resulting in the psoas muscle index (PMI) and skeletal muscle index (SMI), respectively, after indexation to body habitus. Psoas muscle density (PMD), a biomarker for skeletal muscle quality, can be assessed by measuring the psoas muscle CT attenuation coefficient, expressed in Hounsfield units. The concept of low-density muscle (LDM) is explained. Finally, we review the medical literature on PMI and PMD as predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing trauma or elective major surgery, transplantation, and in patients with cardiovascular and internal disease. PMI and PMD are promising new biomarkers predicting adverse outcomes after medical interventions.

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a modern approach to perioperative management. This study aimed to evaluate compliance with certain aspects of the ERAS protocol in malnourished and properly nourished patients undergoing elective surgery.

Material and methods: A questionnaire study was conducted among 197 patients undergoing elective surgery at the university hospital. We divided patients into two groups according to nutritional status.

Results: The study's results showed that 67 patients (34%) lost weight before admission (the weight-loss group). Twenty-five participants (37%) in the weight-loss group and 15 patients (12%) in the preserved-weight group underwent surgery due to cancer ( P < 0.001). More patients in the weight loss group (45 of 67) than in the preserved-weight group (40 of 129, P < 0.001) limited their food intake a week before the surgery. The preserved-weight group participants were mobilized earlier than the weight-loss group ( P = 0.04). The median number of hours since drinking their last fluids and eating their last meals before the surgery were 12.2 hours and 25.4 hours for both groups, respectively. Only eight patients received preoperative carbohydrate loading. We found higher serum protein concentrations in the preserved-weight group (7.10 [0.5] vs. 6.92 [0.71], P = 0.023); however, white blood cell count was higher in the weight-loss group (7.85 (2.28) vs.7.10 (0.50), P = 0.04). Both groups were highly satisfied with their hospital treatments.

Conclusions: Our study revealed relatively high malnutrition in patients undergoing elective surgery. As a standard of perioperative care in the studied centre, the ERAS protocol implementation level is low.