Pub Date : 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02333-8
Tingyu Gou, Rui Liu, Yang Su, Astrid M. Veronig, Hanya Pan, Runbin Luo, Weiqun Gan
Coronal jets are believed to be the miniature version of large-scale solar eruptions. In particular, the eruption of a minifilament inside the base arch is suggested to be the trigger and even driver of blowout jets. Here, we propose an alternative triggering mechanism, based on high-resolution H(alpha ) observations of a blowout jet associated with a minifilament and an M1.2-class flare. The minifilament remains largely stationary during the blowout jet, except that it is straddled by flare loops connecting two flare ribbons, indicating that the magnetic arcade embedding the minifilament has been torn into two parts, with the upper part escaping with the blowout jet. In the wake of the flare, the southern end of the minifilament fans out like neighboring fibrils, indicative of mass and field exchanges between the minifilament and the fibrils. The blowout jet is preceded by a standard jet. With H(alpha ) fibrils moving toward the single-strand spire in a sweeping fashion, the standard jet transitions to the blowout jet. A similar pattern of standard-to-blowout jet transition occurs in an earlier C-class flare before the minifilament forms. The spiraling morphology and sweeping direction of these fibrils are suggestive of their footpoints being dragged by the leading sunspot that undergoes clockwise rotation for over two days. Soon after the sunspot rotation reaches a peak angular speed as fast as 10 deg h−1, the dormant active region becomes flare productive, and the minifilament forms through the interaction of moving magnetic features from the rotating sunspot with satellite spots/pores. Hence, we suggest that the sunspot rotation plays a key role in building up free energy for flares and jets and in triggering blowout jets by inducing sweeping motions of fibrils.
{"title":"High-Resolution Observation of Blowout Jets Regulated by Sunspot Rotation","authors":"Tingyu Gou, Rui Liu, Yang Su, Astrid M. Veronig, Hanya Pan, Runbin Luo, Weiqun Gan","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02333-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02333-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coronal jets are believed to be the miniature version of large-scale solar eruptions. In particular, the eruption of a minifilament inside the base arch is suggested to be the trigger and even driver of blowout jets. Here, we propose an alternative triggering mechanism, based on high-resolution H<span>(alpha )</span> observations of a blowout jet associated with a minifilament and an M1.2-class flare. The minifilament remains largely stationary during the blowout jet, except that it is straddled by flare loops connecting two flare ribbons, indicating that the magnetic arcade embedding the minifilament has been torn into two parts, with the upper part escaping with the blowout jet. In the wake of the flare, the southern end of the minifilament fans out like neighboring fibrils, indicative of mass and field exchanges between the minifilament and the fibrils. The blowout jet is preceded by a standard jet. With H<span>(alpha )</span> fibrils moving toward the single-strand spire in a sweeping fashion, the standard jet transitions to the blowout jet. A similar pattern of standard-to-blowout jet transition occurs in an earlier C-class flare before the minifilament forms. The spiraling morphology and sweeping direction of these fibrils are suggestive of their footpoints being dragged by the leading sunspot that undergoes clockwise rotation for over two days. Soon after the sunspot rotation reaches a peak angular speed as fast as 10 deg h<sup>−1</sup>, the dormant active region becomes flare productive, and the minifilament forms through the interaction of moving magnetic features from the rotating sunspot with satellite spots/pores. Hence, we suggest that the sunspot rotation plays a key role in building up free energy for flares and jets and in triggering blowout jets by inducing sweeping motions of fibrils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141572672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02338-3
Agnieszka Gil, Eleanna Asvestari, Alexandar Mishev, Nicholas Larsen, Ilya Usoskin
The variability of galactic cosmic rays near Earth is nearly isotropic and driven by large-scale heliospheric modulation but rarely can very local anisotropic events be observed in low-energy cosmic rays. These anisotropic cosmic-ray enhancement (ACRE) events are related to interplanetary transients. Until now, two such events have been known. Here, we report the discovery of the third ACRE event observed as an increase of up to 6.4% in count rates of high- and midlatitude neutron monitors between ca. 09 – 14 UT on 5 November 2023 followed by a moderate Forbush decrease and a strong geomagnetic storm. This is the first known observation of ACRE in the midrigidity range of up to 8 GV. The anisotropy axis of ACRE was in the nearly anti-Sun direction. Modeling of the geomagnetic conditions implies that the observed increase was not caused by a storm-induced weakening of the geomagnetic shielding. As suggested by a detailed analysis and qualitative modeling using the EUHFORIA model, the ACRE event was likely produced by the scattering of cosmic rays on an intense interplanetary flux rope propagating north of the Earth and causing a glancing encounter. The forthcoming Forbush decrease was caused by an interplanetary coronal mass ejection that hit Earth centrally. A comprehensive analysis of the ACRE and complex heliospheric conditions is presented. However, a full quantitative modeling of such a complex event is not possible even with the most advanced models and calls for further developments.
{"title":"New Anisotropic Cosmic-Ray Enhancement (ACRE) Event on 5 November 2023 Due to Complex Heliospheric Conditions","authors":"Agnieszka Gil, Eleanna Asvestari, Alexandar Mishev, Nicholas Larsen, Ilya Usoskin","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02338-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02338-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The variability of galactic cosmic rays near Earth is nearly isotropic and driven by large-scale heliospheric modulation but rarely can very local anisotropic events be observed in low-energy cosmic rays. These anisotropic cosmic-ray enhancement (ACRE) events are related to interplanetary transients. Until now, two such events have been known. Here, we report the discovery of the third ACRE event observed as an increase of up to 6.4% in count rates of high- and midlatitude neutron monitors between ca. 09 – 14 UT on 5 November 2023 followed by a moderate Forbush decrease and a strong geomagnetic storm. This is the first known observation of ACRE in the midrigidity range of up to 8 GV. The anisotropy axis of ACRE was in the nearly anti-Sun direction. Modeling of the geomagnetic conditions implies that the observed increase was not caused by a storm-induced weakening of the geomagnetic shielding. As suggested by a detailed analysis and qualitative modeling using the EUHFORIA model, the ACRE event was likely produced by the scattering of cosmic rays on an intense interplanetary flux rope propagating north of the Earth and causing a glancing encounter. The forthcoming Forbush decrease was caused by an interplanetary coronal mass ejection that hit Earth centrally. A comprehensive analysis of the ACRE and complex heliospheric conditions is presented. However, a full quantitative modeling of such a complex event is not possible even with the most advanced models and calls for further developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-024-02338-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02340-9
Junyan Liu, Chenglong Shen, Yang Wang, Mengjiao Xu, Yutian Chi, Zhihui Zhong, Dongwei Mao, Zhiyong Zhang, Can Wang, Jiajia Liu, Yuming Wang
The Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) Index stands as a crucial geomagnetic metric, serving to quantify the intensity of geomagnetic disturbances. The accurate prediction of the Dst index plays a pivotal role in mitigating the detrimental effects caused by severe space-weather events. Therefore, Dst prediction has been a long-standing focal point within the realms of space physics and space-weather forecasting. In this study, a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) is deployed in tandem with the Integrated Gradient (IG) algorithm to predict the Dst index and scrutinize its associated physical processes. With these two components, our model can give the contribution of each input parameter to the outcome along with the forecast. The TCN component of our model utilizes interplanetary observational data, encompassing the vector magnetic field, solar-wind velocity, proton temperature, proton density, interplanetary electric field, and other relevant parameters for forecasting Dst indices. Despite the disparity in test sets, our model’s forecast accuracy approximates the error levels of the prior models. Remarkably, the prediction error of these machine-learning models has become comparable to the inherent error between the Dst index itself and the actual ring-current strength.
To understand the physical process behind the forecasting model, the IG algorithm was applied in our prediction model, in an attempt to analyze the underlying physical process of the machine-learning black box. In the temporal dimension, it is evident that the more recent the time, the more substantial the influence on the final prediction. Regarding the physical parameters, besides the historical Dst index itself, the flow pressure, the (z)-component of the magnetic field, and the proton density all significantly contribute to the final prediction. Additionally, IG attributions were analyzed for subsets of data, including different Dst-index ranges, different observation times, and different interplanetary structures. Most of the subsets exhibit an IG matrix with deviations from the mean distribution, which indicates a complex nonlinear system and sensitivity of the prediction to input values. These analyses align with physical reasoning and are in good agreement with previous research. The results affirm that the TCN+IG technique not only enhances space-weather forecast accuracy but also advances our comprehension of the underlying physical processes in space weather.
{"title":"Forecasting the Dst Index with Temporal Convolutional Network and Integrated Gradients","authors":"Junyan Liu, Chenglong Shen, Yang Wang, Mengjiao Xu, Yutian Chi, Zhihui Zhong, Dongwei Mao, Zhiyong Zhang, Can Wang, Jiajia Liu, Yuming Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02340-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02340-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) Index stands as a crucial geomagnetic metric, serving to quantify the intensity of geomagnetic disturbances. The accurate prediction of the Dst index plays a pivotal role in mitigating the detrimental effects caused by severe space-weather events. Therefore, Dst prediction has been a long-standing focal point within the realms of space physics and space-weather forecasting. In this study, a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) is deployed in tandem with the Integrated Gradient (IG) algorithm to predict the Dst index and scrutinize its associated physical processes. With these two components, our model can give the contribution of each input parameter to the outcome along with the forecast. The TCN component of our model utilizes interplanetary observational data, encompassing the vector magnetic field, solar-wind velocity, proton temperature, proton density, interplanetary electric field, and other relevant parameters for forecasting Dst indices. Despite the disparity in test sets, our model’s forecast accuracy approximates the error levels of the prior models. Remarkably, the prediction error of these machine-learning models has become comparable to the inherent error between the Dst index itself and the actual ring-current strength.</p><p>To understand the physical process behind the forecasting model, the IG algorithm was applied in our prediction model, in an attempt to analyze the underlying physical process of the machine-learning black box. In the temporal dimension, it is evident that the more recent the time, the more substantial the influence on the final prediction. Regarding the physical parameters, besides the historical Dst index itself, the flow pressure, the <span>(z)</span>-component of the magnetic field, and the proton density all significantly contribute to the final prediction. Additionally, IG attributions were analyzed for subsets of data, including different Dst-index ranges, different observation times, and different interplanetary structures. Most of the subsets exhibit an IG matrix with deviations from the mean distribution, which indicates a complex nonlinear system and sensitivity of the prediction to input values. These analyses align with physical reasoning and are in good agreement with previous research. The results affirm that the TCN+IG technique not only enhances space-weather forecast accuracy but also advances our comprehension of the underlying physical processes in space weather.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2
Hemapriya Raju, Saurabh Das
Geomagnetic storms resulting from solar disturbances impact telecommunication and satellite systems. Satellites are positioned at Lagrange point L1 to monitor these disturbances and give warning 30 min to 1 h ahead. As propagation delay from L1 to Earth depends on various factors, estimating the delay using the assumption of ballistic propagation can result in greater uncertainty. In this study, we aim to reduce the uncertainty in the propagation delay by using machine-learning (ML) models. Solar-wind velocity components ((V_{ mathrm{x}}), (V_{mathrm{y}}), (V_{mathrm{z}})), the position of Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) at all three coordinates ((r_{mathrm{x}}), (r_{mathrm{y}}), (r_{mathrm{z}})), and the Earth’s dipole tilt angle at the time of the disturbances are taken as input parameters. The target is the time taken by the disturbances to reach from L1 to the magnetosphere. The study involves a comparison of eight ML models that are trained across three different speed ranges of solar-wind disturbances. For low and very high-speed solar wind, the vector-delay method fares better than the flat-plane propagation method and ML models. Ridge regression performs consistently better at all three speed ranges in ML models. For high-speed solar wind, boosting models perform well with an error of around 3.8 min better than the vector-delay model. Studying the best-performing models through variable-importance measures, the velocity component (V_{mathrm{x}}) is identified as the most important feature for the estimation and aligns well with the flat-plane propagation method. Additionally, for slow solar-wind disturbances, the position of ACE is seen as the second most important feature in ridge regression, while high-speed disturbances emphasize the importance of other vector components of solar-wind speed over the ACE position. This work improves our understanding of the propagation delay of different solar-wind speed and showcases the potential of ML in space weather prediction.
太阳扰动导致的地磁暴会影响电信和卫星系统。卫星位于拉格朗日点 L1,用于监测这些干扰,并提前 30 分钟至 1 小时发出警告。由于从拉格朗日点 L1 到地球的传播延迟取决于各种因素,因此使用弹道传播假设来估算延迟会导致更大的不确定性。在这项研究中,我们旨在利用机器学习(ML)模型来减少传播延迟的不确定性。太阳风速度分量((V_{ mathrm{x}}), (V_{ mathrm{y}}), (V_{ mathrm{z}}) )、高级合成探测器(ACE)在所有三个坐标上的位置((r_{ mathrm{x}})、(r_{/mathrm{y}})、(r_{/mathrm{z}}))以及扰动发生时的地球偶极倾角作为输入参数。目标是扰动从 L1 到达磁层所需的时间。这项研究包括对八个 ML 模型进行比较,这些模型是在三个不同的太阳风扰动速度范围内训练出来的。对于低速和超高速太阳风,矢量延迟法比平面传播法和 ML 模型表现更好。在所有三个速度范围内,岭回归在 ML 模型中的表现一直较好。对于高速太阳风,助推模型表现良好,误差约为 3.8 分钟,优于矢量延迟模型。通过变量重要性度量研究表现最佳的模型,速度分量 (V_{mathrm{x}})被认为是估算中最重要的特征,并且与平面传播方法非常吻合。此外,对于慢速太阳风扰动,ACE 的位置被视为脊回归中第二重要的特征,而高速扰动则强调太阳风速度的其他矢量分量比 ACE 位置更重要。这项工作提高了我们对不同太阳风速度传播延迟的理解,并展示了 ML 在空间天气预报中的潜力。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Various Machine-Learning Models for Solar-Wind Propagation-Delay Estimation","authors":"Hemapriya Raju, Saurabh Das","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geomagnetic storms resulting from solar disturbances impact telecommunication and satellite systems. Satellites are positioned at Lagrange point L1 to monitor these disturbances and give warning 30 min to 1 h ahead. As propagation delay from L1 to Earth depends on various factors, estimating the delay using the assumption of ballistic propagation can result in greater uncertainty. In this study, we aim to reduce the uncertainty in the propagation delay by using machine-learning (ML) models. Solar-wind velocity components (<span>(V_{ mathrm{x}})</span>, <span>(V_{mathrm{y}})</span>, <span>(V_{mathrm{z}})</span>), the position of Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) at all three coordinates (<span>(r_{mathrm{x}})</span>, <span>(r_{mathrm{y}})</span>, <span>(r_{mathrm{z}})</span>), and the Earth’s dipole tilt angle at the time of the disturbances are taken as input parameters. The target is the time taken by the disturbances to reach from L1 to the magnetosphere. The study involves a comparison of eight ML models that are trained across three different speed ranges of solar-wind disturbances. For low and very high-speed solar wind, the vector-delay method fares better than the flat-plane propagation method and ML models. Ridge regression performs consistently better at all three speed ranges in ML models. For high-speed solar wind, boosting models perform well with an error of around 3.8 min better than the vector-delay model. Studying the best-performing models through variable-importance measures, the velocity component <span>(V_{mathrm{x}})</span> is identified as the most important feature for the estimation and aligns well with the flat-plane propagation method. Additionally, for slow solar-wind disturbances, the position of ACE is seen as the second most important feature in ridge regression, while high-speed disturbances emphasize the importance of other vector components of solar-wind speed over the ACE position. This work improves our understanding of the propagation delay of different solar-wind speed and showcases the potential of ML in space weather prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-02DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02337-4
Patrick Antolin, Frédéric Auchère, Ethan Winch, Elie Soubrié, Ramón Oliver
The AIA 304 Å channel on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) offers a unique view of (approx 10^{5}text{ K}) plasma emitting in the He ii 304 Å line. However, when observing off-limb, the emission of the (small) cool structures in the solar atmosphere (such as spicules, coronal rain and prominence material) can be of the same order as the surrounding hot coronal emission from other spectral lines included in the 304 Å passband, particularly over active regions. In this paper, we investigate three methods based on temperature and morphology that are able to distinguish the cool and hot emission within the 304 Å passband. The methods are based on the Differential Emission Measure (DEM), a linear decomposition of the AIA response functions (RFit) and the Blind Source Separation (BSS) technique. All three methods are found to produce satisfactory results in both quiescent and flaring conditions, largely removing the diffuse corona and leading to images with cool material off-limb in sharp contrast with the background. We compare our results with co-aligned data from the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) in the SJI 1400 Å and 2796 Å channels, and find the RFit method to best match the quantity and evolution of the cool material detected with IRIS. Some differences can appear due to plasma emitting in the (log T=5.1,text{--},5.5) temperature range, particularly during the catastrophic cooling stage prior to rain appearance during flares. These methods are, in principle, applicable to any passband from any instrument suffering from similar cool and hot emission ambiguity, as long as there is good coverage of the high-temperature range.
太阳动力学天文台(SDO)上的 AIA 304 Å 频道为观测 He ii 304 Å 线发射的等离子体提供了独特的视角。然而,在离圈观测时,太阳大气中(小)冷结构(如尖晶石、日冕雨和突出物质)的发射可能与周围来自 304 Å 通带中其他光谱线的热日冕发射处于同一量级,尤其是在活跃区上空。在本文中,我们研究了三种基于温度和形态的方法,它们能够区分 304 Å 通带内的冷发射和热发射。这三种方法分别基于差分发射测量(DEM)、AIA 响应函数(RFit)的线性分解和盲源分离(BSS)技术。在静态和耀斑条件下,这三种方法都能产生令人满意的结果,在很大程度上消除了漫射日冕,使图像中的冷物质与背景形成鲜明对比。我们将我们的结果与界面区域成像光谱仪(IRIS)在 SJI 1400 Å 和 2796 Å 频道的共同对齐数据进行了比较,发现 RFit 方法与 IRIS 检测到的冷物质的数量和演变最为匹配。由于等离子体在(log T=5.1,text{--},5.5)温度范围内发射,特别是在耀斑期间雨出现之前的灾难性冷却阶段,可能会出现一些差异。这些方法原则上适用于任何仪器的任何通带,只要能很好地覆盖高温范围,这些仪器都会出现类似的冷热发射模糊现象。
{"title":"Decomposing the AIA 304 Å Channel into Its Cool and Hot Components","authors":"Patrick Antolin, Frédéric Auchère, Ethan Winch, Elie Soubrié, Ramón Oliver","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02337-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02337-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The AIA 304 Å channel on board the <i>Solar Dynamics Observatory</i> (SDO) offers a unique view of <span>(approx 10^{5}text{ K})</span> plasma emitting in the He <span>ii</span> 304 Å line. However, when observing off-limb, the emission of the (small) cool structures in the solar atmosphere (such as spicules, coronal rain and prominence material) can be of the same order as the surrounding hot coronal emission from other spectral lines included in the 304 Å passband, particularly over active regions. In this paper, we investigate three methods based on temperature and morphology that are able to distinguish the cool and hot emission within the 304 Å passband. The methods are based on the Differential Emission Measure (DEM), a linear decomposition of the AIA response functions (RFit) and the Blind Source Separation (BSS) technique. All three methods are found to produce satisfactory results in both quiescent and flaring conditions, largely removing the diffuse corona and leading to images with cool material off-limb in sharp contrast with the background. We compare our results with co-aligned data from the <i>Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph</i> (IRIS) in the SJI 1400 Å and 2796 Å channels, and find the RFit method to best match the quantity and evolution of the cool material detected with IRIS. Some differences can appear due to plasma emitting in the <span>(log T=5.1,text{--},5.5)</span> temperature range, particularly during the catastrophic cooling stage prior to rain appearance during flares. These methods are, in principle, applicable to any passband from any instrument suffering from similar cool and hot emission ambiguity, as long as there is good coverage of the high-temperature range.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-024-02337-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141513402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The solar eruption that occurred on 28 November 2023 (SOL2023-11-28) triggered an intense geomagnetic storm on 1 December 2023. The associated terrestrial auroras manifested at the most southern latitudes in the northern hemisphere observed in the past two decades. In order to explore the profound geoeffectiveness of this event, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of its solar origin to offer potential factors contributing to its impact. Magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) are twisted magnetic structures recognized as significant contributors to coronal mass ejections (CMEs), thereby impacting space weather greatly. In this event, we identified multiple MFRs in the solar active region and observed distinct slipping processes of the three MFRs: MFR1, MFR2, and MFR3. All three MFRs exhibit slipping motions at a speed of 40 – 137 km s−1, extending beyond their original locations. Notably, the slipping of MFR2 extends to (sim 30text{ Mm}) and initiates the eruption of MFR3. Ultimately, MFR1’s eruption results in an M3.4-class flare and a CME, while MFR2 and MFR3 collectively produce an M9.8-class flare and another halo CME. This study shows the slipping process in a multi-MFR system, showing how one MFR’s slipping can trigger the eruption of another MFR. We propose that the CME–CME interactions caused by multiple MFR eruptions may contribute to the significant geoeffectiveness.
{"title":"The Solar Origin of an Intense Geomagnetic Storm on 1 December 2023: Successive Slipping and Eruption of Multiple Magnetic Flux Ropes","authors":"Zheng Sun, Ting Li, Yijun Hou, Hui Tian, Ziqi Wu, Ke Li, Yining Zhang, Zhentong Li, Xianyong Bai, Li Feng, Chuan Li, Zhenyong Hou, Qiao Song, Jingsong Wang, Guiping Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02329-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02329-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The solar eruption that occurred on 28 November 2023 (SOL2023-11-28) triggered an intense geomagnetic storm on 1 December 2023. The associated terrestrial auroras manifested at the most southern latitudes in the northern hemisphere observed in the past two decades. In order to explore the profound geoeffectiveness of this event, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of its solar origin to offer potential factors contributing to its impact. Magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) are twisted magnetic structures recognized as significant contributors to coronal mass ejections (CMEs), thereby impacting space weather greatly. In this event, we identified multiple MFRs in the solar active region and observed distinct slipping processes of the three MFRs: MFR1, MFR2, and MFR3. All three MFRs exhibit slipping motions at a speed of 40 – 137 km s<sup>−1</sup>, extending beyond their original locations. Notably, the slipping of MFR2 extends to <span>(sim 30text{ Mm})</span> and initiates the eruption of MFR3. Ultimately, MFR1’s eruption results in an M3.4-class flare and a CME, while MFR2 and MFR3 collectively produce an M9.8-class flare and another halo CME. This study shows the slipping process in a multi-MFR system, showing how one MFR’s slipping can trigger the eruption of another MFR. We propose that the CME–CME interactions caused by multiple MFR eruptions may contribute to the significant geoeffectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141507229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-25DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02330-x
Beili Ying, Guanglu Shi, Li Feng, Lei Lu, Jianchao Xue, Shuting Li, Weiqun Gan, Hui Li
The combination of the H i Ly(alpha ) (121.6 nm) line formation mechanism with ultraviolet (UV) Ly(alpha ) and white-light (WL) observations provides an effective method for determining the electron temperature of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). A key to ensuring the accuracy of this diagnostic technique is the precise calculation of theoretical Ly(alpha ) intensities. This study performs a modeled CME and its driven shock via the three-dimensional numerical magneto-hydrodynamic simulation. Then, we generate synthetic UV and WL images of the CME and shock within a few solar radii to quantify the impact of different assumptions on the theoretical Ly(alpha ) intensities, such as the incident intensity of the solar chromospheric Ly(alpha ) line ((I_{disk})), the geometric scattering function ((p(theta ))), and the kinetic temperature ((T_{ boldsymbol{n}})) assumed to be equal to either the proton ((T_{p})) or electron ((T_{e})) temperature. By comparing differences of the Ly(alpha ) intensities of the CME and shock under these assumptions, we find that: (1) Using the uniform or Carrington maps of the disk Ly(alpha ) emission underestimates the corona Ly(alpha ) intensity (with relative uncertainties below 10%) compared to the synchronic map, except for a slight overestimate (<4%) observed in the partial CME core. The Carrington map yields lower uncertainties than the uniform disk. (2) Neglecting the geometric scattering process has a relatively minor impact on the Ly(alpha ) intensity, with a maximum relative uncertainty of no more than 5%. The Ly(alpha ) intensity is underestimated for the most part but overestimated in the CME core. (3) Compared to the assumption (T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{p}), using (T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{e}) leads to more complex relative uncertainties in CME Ly(alpha ) intensity. The CME core and void are both overestimated, with the maximum relative uncertainty in the core exceeding 50% and in the void remaining below 35%. An appropriate increasing proton-to-electron temperature ratio can reduce the uncertainty in the CME core and void. In the CME front, both overestimates and underestimates exist with relative uncertainties of less than 35%. The electron temperature assumption has a smaller impact on the shock, with an underestimated relative uncertainty of less than 20%.
H i Ly(α )(121.6纳米)线形成机制与紫外线(UV)Ly(α )和白光(WL)观测相结合,为确定日冕物质抛射(CMEs)的电子温度提供了一种有效的方法。确保这一诊断技术准确性的关键是精确计算理论Ly(α )强度。本研究通过三维磁流体动力数值模拟,对CME及其驱动的冲击进行建模。然后,我们生成了几个太阳半径范围内的CME和冲击的合成紫外和可见光图像,以量化不同假设对理论Ly(α)强度的影响,如太阳色球Ly(α)线的入射强度(I_{disk})、几何散射函数(p(theta)),以及假定等于质子(T_{p})或电子(T_{e})温度的动力学温度(T_{boldsymbol{n}})。通过比较这些假设下CME和冲击的Ly(α)强度的差异,我们发现(1) 与同步图相比,使用盘面Ly(α)发射的均匀图或卡林顿图会低估日冕的Ly(α)强度(相对不确定性低于10%),除了在部分CME核心观察到的轻微高估(<4%)。卡林顿图的不确定性低于均匀盘。(2) 忽略几何散射过程对Ly(α)强度的影响相对较小,最大相对不确定性不超过5%。Ly(α )强度大部分被低估了,但在CME核心被高估了。(3) 与假设(T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{p})相比,使用(T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{e})会导致CME Ly(α )强度的相对不确定性更加复杂。CME的核心和空隙都被高估了,核心的最大相对不确定性超过了50%,而空隙则保持在35%以下。适当提高质子-电子温度比可以降低 CME 核心和空隙的不确定性。在 CME 前端,高估和低估都存在,相对不确定性低于 35%。电子温度假设对冲击的影响较小,低估的相对不确定性小于 20%。
{"title":"Parameter Effects on the Total Intensity of H i Ly(alpha ) Line for a Modeled Coronal Mass Ejection and Its Driven Shock","authors":"Beili Ying, Guanglu Shi, Li Feng, Lei Lu, Jianchao Xue, Shuting Li, Weiqun Gan, Hui Li","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02330-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02330-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The combination of the H <span>i</span> Ly<span>(alpha )</span> (121.6 nm) line formation mechanism with ultraviolet (UV) Ly<span>(alpha )</span> and white-light (WL) observations provides an effective method for determining the electron temperature of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). A key to ensuring the accuracy of this diagnostic technique is the precise calculation of theoretical Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensities. This study performs a modeled CME and its driven shock via the three-dimensional numerical magneto-hydrodynamic simulation. Then, we generate synthetic UV and WL images of the CME and shock within a few solar radii to quantify the impact of different assumptions on the theoretical Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensities, such as the incident intensity of the solar chromospheric Ly<span>(alpha )</span> line (<span>(I_{disk})</span>), the geometric scattering function (<span>(p(theta ))</span>), and the kinetic temperature (<span>(T_{ boldsymbol{n}})</span>) assumed to be equal to either the proton (<span>(T_{p})</span>) or electron (<span>(T_{e})</span>) temperature. By comparing differences of the Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensities of the CME and shock under these assumptions, we find that: (1) Using the uniform or Carrington maps of the disk Ly<span>(alpha )</span> emission underestimates the corona Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensity (with relative uncertainties below 10%) compared to the synchronic map, except for a slight overestimate (<4%) observed in the partial CME core. The Carrington map yields lower uncertainties than the uniform disk. (2) Neglecting the geometric scattering process has a relatively minor impact on the Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensity, with a maximum relative uncertainty of no more than 5%. The Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensity is underestimated for the most part but overestimated in the CME core. (3) Compared to the assumption <span>(T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{p})</span>, using <span>(T_{boldsymbol{n}}=T_{e})</span> leads to more complex relative uncertainties in CME Ly<span>(alpha )</span> intensity. The CME core and void are both overestimated, with the maximum relative uncertainty in the core exceeding 50% and in the void remaining below 35%. An appropriate increasing proton-to-electron temperature ratio can reduce the uncertainty in the CME core and void. In the CME front, both overestimates and underestimates exist with relative uncertainties of less than 35%. The electron temperature assumption has a smaller impact on the shock, with an underestimated relative uncertainty of less than 20%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141507230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02322-x
Shahid Idrees, Jiangtao Su, Jie Chen, Yuanyong Deng
In this study, we investigate the decay of sunspots in the active region NOAA 13229 using data from the ASO-S/FMG and SDO/HMI. We closely examine the decay patterns of sunspots S1 and S2, which reveal different decay rates and features due to the mechanisms of magnetic cancellation, dispersion, and the role of horizontal flows. Our analysis highlights the significant impact of magnetic flux changes, including the decrease of both the sunspot area and magnetic flux over time, which adheres to distinct decay laws. This study elucidates the complex interplay between magnetic submergence, cancellation, and dispersion in the sunspot decay process, contributing to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving these phenomena. Our results emphasize the importance of horizontal flow dynamics in shaping the decay characteristics of sunspots, providing insights for the role played by the magnetic and plasma processes in solar active regions.
{"title":"Investigation of Decaying (beta )-Configuration Sunspot in Active Region NOAA 13229","authors":"Shahid Idrees, Jiangtao Su, Jie Chen, Yuanyong Deng","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02322-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02322-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we investigate the decay of sunspots in the active region NOAA 13229 using data from the ASO-S/FMG and SDO/HMI. We closely examine the decay patterns of sunspots S1 and S2, which reveal different decay rates and features due to the mechanisms of magnetic cancellation, dispersion, and the role of horizontal flows. Our analysis highlights the significant impact of magnetic flux changes, including the decrease of both the sunspot area and magnetic flux over time, which adheres to distinct decay laws. This study elucidates the complex interplay between magnetic submergence, cancellation, and dispersion in the sunspot decay process, contributing to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving these phenomena. Our results emphasize the importance of horizontal flow dynamics in shaping the decay characteristics of sunspots, providing insights for the role played by the magnetic and plasma processes in solar active regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141507231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-21DOI: 10.1007/s11207-024-02335-6
Jaidev Sharma, Shyamal Kumar Banerjee, Nitin Kumar Singh, Hari Om Vats
The long-term study of the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar photosphere, chromosphere, and corona has been widely undertaken. To date it is unclear whether the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar transition region has a systematic periodicity. In this article we perform a study on the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar transition region. For this purpose, we use the Lyman (alpha ) line emission at a wavelength of 121.56 nm corresponding to the solar transition region from the year 1965 to 2019, covering four complete solar cycles (i.e., Cycles 21, 22, 23, 24) as well as descending and ascending phases of Cycles 20 and 25, respectively. An autocorrelation analysis depicts that the average sidereal rotation period of the transition region (from 1965 to 2019) is 24.8 days. Furthermore, we find that a significant periodicity of about 12 years exists in the temporal variation of the sidereal rotation period of the solar transition region. The results indicate that this periodicity is closely linked to the 11-year Schwabe cycle. A cross-correlation analysis between the time series of the sidereal rotation period and sunspot numbers (as a function of lag in years) exhibits a positive correlation between these aforementioned parameters. From this result, we can state that the sidereal rotation period of the solar transition region leads the solar activity by about six months. This correlation again proves the periodicity of about 11 years in the rotation period of the transition region which is closely linked to the 11-year Schwabe cycle. Furthermore, long-term variation of rotation periods also demonstrates a decreasing trend from 1965 to 2019, which is similar to that in the sunspot numbers. From this long-term study, it seems that solar activity is largely driven by solar rotation.
{"title":"Periodicity in the Rotation of the Solar Transition Region and Sunspot Numbers","authors":"Jaidev Sharma, Shyamal Kumar Banerjee, Nitin Kumar Singh, Hari Om Vats","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02335-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-024-02335-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The long-term study of the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar photosphere, chromosphere, and corona has been widely undertaken. To date it is unclear whether the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar transition region has a systematic periodicity. In this article we perform a study on the temporal variation of the rotation period of the solar transition region. For this purpose, we use the Lyman <span>(alpha )</span> line emission at a wavelength of 121.56 nm corresponding to the solar transition region from the year 1965 to 2019, covering four complete solar cycles (i.e., Cycles 21, 22, 23, 24) as well as descending and ascending phases of Cycles 20 and 25, respectively. An autocorrelation analysis depicts that the average sidereal rotation period of the transition region (from 1965 to 2019) is 24.8 days. Furthermore, we find that a significant periodicity of about 12 years exists in the temporal variation of the sidereal rotation period of the solar transition region. The results indicate that this periodicity is closely linked to the 11-year Schwabe cycle. A cross-correlation analysis between the time series of the sidereal rotation period and sunspot numbers (as a function of lag in years) exhibits a positive correlation between these aforementioned parameters. From this result, we can state that the sidereal rotation period of the solar transition region leads the solar activity by about six months. This correlation again proves the periodicity of about 11 years in the rotation period of the transition region which is closely linked to the 11-year Schwabe cycle. Furthermore, long-term variation of rotation periods also demonstrates a decreasing trend from 1965 to 2019, which is similar to that in the sunspot numbers. From this long-term study, it seems that solar activity is largely driven by solar rotation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141507232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}