Slaughterhouses in The Gambia serve as critical feeding sites for diverse vertebrate scavenger communities, including hooded vultures, domestic dogs, pigs and avian species such as pied crows, black kites and cattle egrets. This study investigated how the quantity and type of organic waste influence the composition and competitive interactions of scavengers across five slaughterhouses. Using multivariate statistical models, we found that waste quantity was the strongest predictor of scavenger community composition, explaining 32.7% of the variation, with hooded vultures being most abundant at high-waste sites. Specific waste types influenced feeding behaviour, suggesting niche differentiation among species; for instance, cattle egrets focused on blood and insects, while vultures dominated meat-based resources. Competitive interactions varied by species, with domestic dogs frequently displacing vultures without physical conflict, whereas hooded vultures dominated interactions against other birds. Activity patterns revealed temporal separation, with vultures and dogs active primarily in the morning, and other avian scavengers more active in the afternoon, reducing interspecific competition. The study highlights the essential role of hooded vultures in waste management and disease mitigation but also emphasises how poor fencing facilitates mammalian access, intensifying competition and potentially threatening obligate scavengers. Improving fencing, controlling feeding, and incorporating targeted waste management strategies are recommended to support scavenger conservation and enhance ecosystem services in urbanised environments.
{"title":"Amount of Organic Waste Affects the Composition and Interactions of Vertebrate Scavengers at Gambian Slaughterhouses","authors":"Michael Bode Agunbiade, Esteban Menares, Chefor Fotang, Mawdo Jallow, Fagimba Camara, Evidence Chinedu Enoguanbhor, Wakil Adebola Shittu, Darcy Ogada, Klaus Birkhofer","doi":"10.1111/aje.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Slaughterhouses in The Gambia serve as critical feeding sites for diverse vertebrate scavenger communities, including hooded vultures, domestic dogs, pigs and avian species such as pied crows, black kites and cattle egrets. This study investigated how the quantity and type of organic waste influence the composition and competitive interactions of scavengers across five slaughterhouses. Using multivariate statistical models, we found that waste quantity was the strongest predictor of scavenger community composition, explaining 32.7% of the variation, with hooded vultures being most abundant at high-waste sites. Specific waste types influenced feeding behaviour, suggesting niche differentiation among species; for instance, cattle egrets focused on blood and insects, while vultures dominated meat-based resources. Competitive interactions varied by species, with domestic dogs frequently displacing vultures without physical conflict, whereas hooded vultures dominated interactions against other birds. Activity patterns revealed temporal separation, with vultures and dogs active primarily in the morning, and other avian scavengers more active in the afternoon, reducing interspecific competition. The study highlights the essential role of hooded vultures in waste management and disease mitigation but also emphasises how poor fencing facilitates mammalian access, intensifying competition and potentially threatening obligate scavengers. Improving fencing, controlling feeding, and incorporating targeted waste management strategies are recommended to support scavenger conservation and enhance ecosystem services in urbanised environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143904938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ecology's strength lies in its ability to explain and predict interactions between organisms and their environment. However, African ecological research has historically been dominated by descriptive studies, focusing on biodiversity patterns, species distributions, and behavioural observations or monitoring of large mammal populations (especially in East African savannahs). This pattern has also traditionally characterised the African studies in community ecology. While valuable, these studies often fall short in providing predictive insights essential for addressing pressing ecological challenges such as climate change, species interactions and ecosystem resilience. We advocate for a paradigm shift in African community ecology—moving beyond description to hypothesis-driven, predictive research. Community ecology studies in Africa can transcend pattern documentation to uncover the mechanisms underlying ecological processes by integrating methodologies such as null models, Monte Carlo simulations and predictive modelling based upon data mining techniques. Predictive studies focusing on species interactions, community assembly and ecosystem functions have the potential to enhance both theoretical and applied ecological science, ensuring its global relevance. Curriculum reforms in ecological statistics and methodological training in African academic institutions will be crucial in fostering this transformation. As the African Journal of Ecology seeks to champion this transition, we urge researchers to embrace predictive frameworks that not only document biodiversity but also provide actionable insights into ecosystem dynamics. This could be achieved also by re-analysing long-term data sets that have been published in several less-distributed journals, often in other languages than English. This shift is critical to positioning African ecology at the forefront of the international ecological discourse, driving impactful conservation and management strategies.
{"title":"Beyond Description: Unlocking the Predictive Potential of African Ecology","authors":"Luca Luiselli, Nic Pacini","doi":"10.1111/aje.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecology's strength lies in its ability to explain and predict interactions between organisms and their environment. However, African ecological research has historically been dominated by descriptive studies, focusing on biodiversity patterns, species distributions, and behavioural observations or monitoring of large mammal populations (especially in East African savannahs). This pattern has also traditionally characterised the African studies in community ecology. While valuable, these studies often fall short in providing predictive insights essential for addressing pressing ecological challenges such as climate change, species interactions and ecosystem resilience. We advocate for a paradigm shift in African community ecology—moving beyond description to hypothesis-driven, predictive research. Community ecology studies in Africa can transcend pattern documentation to uncover the mechanisms underlying ecological processes by integrating methodologies such as null models, Monte Carlo simulations and predictive modelling based upon data mining techniques. Predictive studies focusing on species interactions, community assembly and ecosystem functions have the potential to enhance both theoretical and applied ecological science, ensuring its global relevance. Curriculum reforms in ecological statistics and methodological training in African academic institutions will be crucial in fostering this transformation. As the <i>African Journal of Ecology</i> seeks to champion this transition, we urge researchers to embrace predictive frameworks that not only document biodiversity but also provide actionable insights into ecosystem dynamics. This could be achieved also by re-analysing long-term data sets that have been published in several less-distributed journals, often in other languages than English. This shift is critical to positioning African ecology at the forefront of the international ecological discourse, driving impactful conservation and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143884132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}