Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002808
Allison M Flowerdew, W Shane Journeay
{"title":"Second-Order Peer Reviews of Clinically Relevant Articles for the Physiatrist: \" Context of Injury and Clinical Trajectories After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury \".","authors":"Allison M Flowerdew, W Shane Journeay","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002808","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002808","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145538621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on pain intensity, psychological symptoms, and quality of life in patients with central poststroke pain (CPSP).
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched through April 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were performed by stimulation target and modality.
Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 430 participants were included. Compared with sham stimulation, NIBS significantly reduced pain intensity (SMD = -0.64, 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.05, p = 0.035). Subgroup analyses showed greater pain reduction when stimulation targeted the primary motor cortex (M1) (SMD = -1.07, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.52) and when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.17). However, no significant effects were observed on depression, anxiety, or quality of life.
Conclusion: NIBS, particularly M1 stimulation and tDCS, may provide analgesic benefits for CPSP but appears ineffective for psychosocial outcomes. Larger, well-designed trials are required to validate stimulation-specific efficacy and clarify the broader therapeutic role of NIBS in CPSP.
{"title":"Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation for patients with central poststroke pain: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Tieshan Li, Xianjun Zhang, Xiaoming Yu, Minghua Zhong, Chengfei Gao","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on pain intensity, psychological symptoms, and quality of life in patients with central poststroke pain (CPSP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched through April 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were performed by stimulation target and modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen RCTs involving 430 participants were included. Compared with sham stimulation, NIBS significantly reduced pain intensity (SMD = -0.64, 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.05, p = 0.035). Subgroup analyses showed greater pain reduction when stimulation targeted the primary motor cortex (M1) (SMD = -1.07, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.52) and when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.17). However, no significant effects were observed on depression, anxiety, or quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIBS, particularly M1 stimulation and tDCS, may provide analgesic benefits for CPSP but appears ineffective for psychosocial outcomes. Larger, well-designed trials are required to validate stimulation-specific efficacy and clarify the broader therapeutic role of NIBS in CPSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002926
Hilmi Berkan Abacıoğlu, Ahmet Furkan Çolak, Mustafa Cihad Güneş, Berkay Yalçınkaya, Murat Kara
{"title":"Subdeltoid Bursitis Following a Transient Ischemic Attack.","authors":"Hilmi Berkan Abacıoğlu, Ahmet Furkan Çolak, Mustafa Cihad Güneş, Berkay Yalçınkaya, Murat Kara","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002926","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002932
Ivo Petrov, Kamen Stoichev, Okan Aliman, Yana Kashilska, Dolina Gencheva, Georgi Goranov, Dorothea Tsekoura, Gabriel Parisotto, Arthur Sa Ferreira, Agnaldo José Lopes, Nigyar Dzhafer, Hristo Bozov, Kiril Panayotov, Jannis Papathanasiou
Objective: To compare the effects of two nutritional supplementation strategies Amendcor® (Creatine, D-ribose, coenzyme Q10, and vitamin E) vs. Ubiquinol+D-ribose, combined with a 12-wk group-based high-intensity aerobic interval training (GB-HIAIT) on functional exercise capacity (FEC), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and perceived exertion (PE), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Design: 68 patients with HFrEF were randomly assigned to a Creatine + D-ribose + CoQ10 + Vit. E) (n = 35) or a Ubiquinol + D-ribose group (n = 33) and performed GB-HIAIT. The primary outcome was FEC, assessed via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), peak VO₂, and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Secondary outcomes included HRQoL, LVEF, and PE.
Results: Study participants supplemented with Creatine + D-ribose + CoQ10 + Vit. E demonstrated significantly greater improvements in FEC (6MWT: +19.88%, VO₂ peak: +25.46%, PE: -38.53%), HRQoL: -25.64%, LVEF: +40.94%, compared with subjects supplemented with Ubiquinol + D-ribose (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Patients with HFrEF who received multi-ingredient supplementation combined with GB-HIAIT demonstrated superior improvements in FEC, HRQoL, LVEF, and PE, compared with those supplemented with Ubiquinol + D-ribose.
目的:比较两种营养补充策略amendor®(肌酸、d - rna、辅酶Q10和维生素E)与Ubiquinol+ d - rna,结合12周的高强度有氧间歇训练(GB-HIAIT)对心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者功能运动能力(FEC)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和感觉用力(PE)的影响。设计:68例HFrEF患者被随机分配到肌酸+ d -核糖+辅酶q10 + Vit组。E组(n = 35)或Ubiquinol + d -核糖组(n = 33)行GB-HIAIT。主要终点是FEC,通过6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、vo2峰值和呼吸交换率(RER)峰值进行评估。次要结局包括HRQoL、LVEF和PE。结果:研究参与者补充了肌酸+ d -核糖+辅酶q10 + Vit。E组FEC (6MWT: +19.88%, VO 2峰:+25.46%,PE: -38.53%)、HRQoL: -25.64%, LVEF: +40.94% (P < 0.05)。结论:与补充泛醇+ d -核糖的患者相比,接受多成分补充剂联合GB-HIAIT的HFrEF患者在FEC、HRQoL、LVEF和PE方面表现出更优越的改善。
{"title":"Effects of differing nutritional supplementation combined with high-intensity aerobic interval training on functional exercise capacity, cardiac function, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized trial.","authors":"Ivo Petrov, Kamen Stoichev, Okan Aliman, Yana Kashilska, Dolina Gencheva, Georgi Goranov, Dorothea Tsekoura, Gabriel Parisotto, Arthur Sa Ferreira, Agnaldo José Lopes, Nigyar Dzhafer, Hristo Bozov, Kiril Panayotov, Jannis Papathanasiou","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002932","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002932","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of two nutritional supplementation strategies Amendcor® (Creatine, D-ribose, coenzyme Q10, and vitamin E) vs. Ubiquinol+D-ribose, combined with a 12-wk group-based high-intensity aerobic interval training (GB-HIAIT) on functional exercise capacity (FEC), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and perceived exertion (PE), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>68 patients with HFrEF were randomly assigned to a Creatine + D-ribose + CoQ10 + Vit. E) (n = 35) or a Ubiquinol + D-ribose group (n = 33) and performed GB-HIAIT. The primary outcome was FEC, assessed via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), peak VO₂, and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Secondary outcomes included HRQoL, LVEF, and PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants supplemented with Creatine + D-ribose + CoQ10 + Vit. E demonstrated significantly greater improvements in FEC (6MWT: +19.88%, VO₂ peak: +25.46%, PE: -38.53%), HRQoL: -25.64%, LVEF: +40.94%, compared with subjects supplemented with Ubiquinol + D-ribose (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with HFrEF who received multi-ingredient supplementation combined with GB-HIAIT demonstrated superior improvements in FEC, HRQoL, LVEF, and PE, compared with those supplemented with Ubiquinol + D-ribose.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002929
Hilmi Berkan Abacıoğlu, Alp Çetin
{"title":"Advanced Ultrasonographic Insights into Neglected/Occult Achilles Tendon Rupture in Rheumatoid Arthritis.","authors":"Hilmi Berkan Abacıoğlu, Alp Çetin","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002929","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002927
Matthew M Hanks, Joshua M Leonardis, Adam W Bleakney, Sarah Bruch, Jonathon W Senefeld
Objective: To evaluate the historical trends of sex differences in athletic performance and participation among male and female wheelchair marathon athletes.
Design: This retrospective, observational study utilized secondary, publicly available data of the Boston, Chicago, and New York City marathons within the Wheelchair Division from 1984 to 2023. Athletic performance and participation were evaluated across all marathon events and over time using univariate analysis of variance and Pearson correlations.
Results: Sex differences in athletic performance were observed with males outperforming females in all marathon events over time (p < 0.001). The sex difference among first place finishers was 20% and increased to 33% for tenth place finishers. Though sex differences decreased over time (p < 0.001), large sex differences in performance remain. Female athlete participation in wheelchair marathon events significantly increased over time (p < 0.001) and the ratio of male athletes to female athletes in these events significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001). Overall participation and male athlete participation also generally increased over time.
Conclusion: Significant sex differences were observed in wheelchair marathon performance and participation. These findings highlight the importance of sex as a key biological variable related to human health and performance, especially among wheelchair athletes.
{"title":"Sex differences in wheelchair marathon performance.","authors":"Matthew M Hanks, Joshua M Leonardis, Adam W Bleakney, Sarah Bruch, Jonathon W Senefeld","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the historical trends of sex differences in athletic performance and participation among male and female wheelchair marathon athletes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective, observational study utilized secondary, publicly available data of the Boston, Chicago, and New York City marathons within the Wheelchair Division from 1984 to 2023. Athletic performance and participation were evaluated across all marathon events and over time using univariate analysis of variance and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sex differences in athletic performance were observed with males outperforming females in all marathon events over time (p < 0.001). The sex difference among first place finishers was 20% and increased to 33% for tenth place finishers. Though sex differences decreased over time (p < 0.001), large sex differences in performance remain. Female athlete participation in wheelchair marathon events significantly increased over time (p < 0.001) and the ratio of male athletes to female athletes in these events significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001). Overall participation and male athlete participation also generally increased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant sex differences were observed in wheelchair marathon performance and participation. These findings highlight the importance of sex as a key biological variable related to human health and performance, especially among wheelchair athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002923
Shantanu A Satpute, Rosemarie Cooper, Garrett Grindle, Rory A Cooper
Objectives: Transfers between wheelchairs and beds pose injury risks to users and caregivers, with conventional devices often inefficient and unsafe. The Powered Personal Transfer System (PPTS)-a no-lift solution integrating an Electric Powered Wheelchair (EPW) and hospital bed-aims to improve safety and efficiency. This study evaluated (1) the usability of the PPTS compared with current transfer methods, (2) whether design refinements, including a docking station for EPW positioning, reduced workload, and (3) whether EPW modifications affected indoor mobility functionality.
Design: Cross-sectional usability study.
Setting: Simulated bedroom laboratory.
Intervention: Participants viewed a short instructional video, performed transfers using the PPTS, and completed validated usability measures comparing the PPTS with their usual transfer methods.
Main outcome measures: System Usability Scale (SUS), Usability Scale for Assistive Technology (USAT), NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for mobility ease.
Results: The PPTS achieved excellent usability. SUS scores were higher than current methods (users: 90 vs 63.4, p < .01; caregivers: 82.5 vs 62.5, p = .013). The docking station reduced mental workload (p < .001). Mobility tasks were rated easy (median VAS >8.5).
Conclusion: PPTS demonstrated excellent usability, and outperformed existing transfer methods, offering a promising, safe, and efficient no-lift transfer solution.
目标:轮椅和床之间的转移对使用者和护理人员造成伤害风险,传统设备往往效率低下且不安全。动力个人转移系统(PPTS)是一种集成了电动轮椅(EPW)和医院病床的无电梯解决方案,旨在提高安全性和效率。本研究评估了(1)与现有运输方法相比,PPTS的可用性;(2)设计改进(包括用于EPW定位的对接站)是否减少了工作量;(3)EPW的修改是否影响室内移动功能。设计:横断面可用性研究。设置:模拟卧室实验室。干预:参与者观看一个简短的教学视频,使用PPTS进行转移,并完成有效的可用性测量,将PPTS与他们通常的转移方法进行比较。主要结果测量:系统可用性量表(SUS)、辅助技术可用性量表(USAT)、NASA任务负荷指数(NASA- tlx)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。结果:PPTS具有良好的可用性。SUS评分高于现有方法(使用者:90 vs 63.4, p < 0.01;护理者:82.5 vs 62.5, p = 0.013)。坞站减少了脑力工作量(p < 0.001)。活动任务被评为容易(VAS中位>8.5)。结论:PPTS表现出良好的可用性,优于现有的转移方法,提供了一种有前途的、安全高效的无升降转移解决方案。
{"title":"Improving Wheelchair Transfers: Usability Study of a Robotic Transfer System.","authors":"Shantanu A Satpute, Rosemarie Cooper, Garrett Grindle, Rory A Cooper","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transfers between wheelchairs and beds pose injury risks to users and caregivers, with conventional devices often inefficient and unsafe. The Powered Personal Transfer System (PPTS)-a no-lift solution integrating an Electric Powered Wheelchair (EPW) and hospital bed-aims to improve safety and efficiency. This study evaluated (1) the usability of the PPTS compared with current transfer methods, (2) whether design refinements, including a docking station for EPW positioning, reduced workload, and (3) whether EPW modifications affected indoor mobility functionality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional usability study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Simulated bedroom laboratory.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants viewed a short instructional video, performed transfers using the PPTS, and completed validated usability measures comparing the PPTS with their usual transfer methods.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>System Usability Scale (SUS), Usability Scale for Assistive Technology (USAT), NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for mobility ease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PPTS achieved excellent usability. SUS scores were higher than current methods (users: 90 vs 63.4, p < .01; caregivers: 82.5 vs 62.5, p = .013). The docking station reduced mental workload (p < .001). Mobility tasks were rated easy (median VAS >8.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPTS demonstrated excellent usability, and outperformed existing transfer methods, offering a promising, safe, and efficient no-lift transfer solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract: Early recovery of arm and trunk function after high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging. We report a case of a 42-year-old woman with subacute C3 AIS B SCI treated with cervical and thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) during acute inpatient rehabilitation. Initiated six weeks post-injury alongside physical therapy, tSCS was associated with improved motor scores (0 to 10), sensory gains, and AIS conversion to C. Functional gains included better trunk control and voluntary upper extremity movement. Treatment was well tolerated without adverse effects. This case supports the feasibility and potential efficacy of early tSCS integration in acute cervical SCI rehabilitation and warrants further study.
{"title":"Early Application of Cervical and Thoracic Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation for High Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.","authors":"Danyal Tahseen, Halle Flate, Hilary Osterman, Cory Wernimont","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Early recovery of arm and trunk function after high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging. We report a case of a 42-year-old woman with subacute C3 AIS B SCI treated with cervical and thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) during acute inpatient rehabilitation. Initiated six weeks post-injury alongside physical therapy, tSCS was associated with improved motor scores (0 to 10), sensory gains, and AIS conversion to C. Functional gains included better trunk control and voluntary upper extremity movement. Treatment was well tolerated without adverse effects. This case supports the feasibility and potential efficacy of early tSCS integration in acute cervical SCI rehabilitation and warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002916
Quintin Peters, Yumeng Wang, Hogene Kim, Corrie Yablon, Jon Jacobson, Anita Vasavada, Xuming He, James Ashton-Miller, James T Eckner
Magnetic resonance imaging is the current "gold standard" for measuring cervical muscle volume, but the associated time and cost may be prohibitive in numerous environments. This study sought to develop a novel and accessible model for estimating cervical muscle volume in adolescent athletes. It was hypothesized that cervical muscle volume could be accurately predicted using a combination of clinically-accessible variables. This secondary analysis of clinical trial data utilized 78 sets of biomechanics lab measurements and neck magnetic resonance imaging scans collected in a total of 42 adolescent athletes to develop a multiple linear regression model for predicting total cervical muscle volume. The final regression model was significant (R2 = 0.7644, F = 78.94, p < 0.001) and successfully predicted total cervical muscle volume using body weight, sex, and neck circumference as model inputs. These variables can be easily obtained using simple measurement tools that are available across most clinical and research environments. This model may be used by medical professionals and researchers to estimate total cervical muscle volume when magnetic resonance imaging measurements are unavailable.
磁共振成像是目前测量颈椎肌肉体积的“金标准”,但在许多环境下,相关的时间和成本可能令人望而却步。本研究旨在建立一种新的、可接近的模型来估计青少年运动员的颈椎肌肉体积。假设使用临床可获得的变量组合可以准确预测颈椎肌肉体积。这项临床试验数据的二次分析利用了总共42名青少年运动员的78组生物力学实验室测量数据和颈部磁共振成像扫描数据,建立了一个预测颈部肌肉总量的多元线性回归模型。最终回归模型具有显著性(R2 = 0.7644, F = 78.94, p < 0.001),并以体重、性别和颈围作为模型输入成功预测了总颈肌体积。这些变量可以使用大多数临床和研究环境中可用的简单测量工具轻松获得。该模型可用于医学专业人员和研究人员在磁共振成像测量不可用时估计总颈肌体积。
{"title":"Developing a Novel, Accessible Method for Estimating Cervical Muscle Volume in Adolescent Athletes.","authors":"Quintin Peters, Yumeng Wang, Hogene Kim, Corrie Yablon, Jon Jacobson, Anita Vasavada, Xuming He, James Ashton-Miller, James T Eckner","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic resonance imaging is the current \"gold standard\" for measuring cervical muscle volume, but the associated time and cost may be prohibitive in numerous environments. This study sought to develop a novel and accessible model for estimating cervical muscle volume in adolescent athletes. It was hypothesized that cervical muscle volume could be accurately predicted using a combination of clinically-accessible variables. This secondary analysis of clinical trial data utilized 78 sets of biomechanics lab measurements and neck magnetic resonance imaging scans collected in a total of 42 adolescent athletes to develop a multiple linear regression model for predicting total cervical muscle volume. The final regression model was significant (R2 = 0.7644, F = 78.94, p < 0.001) and successfully predicted total cervical muscle volume using body weight, sex, and neck circumference as model inputs. These variables can be easily obtained using simple measurement tools that are available across most clinical and research environments. This model may be used by medical professionals and researchers to estimate total cervical muscle volume when magnetic resonance imaging measurements are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002913
Merve Çetin, Seçilay Güneş, Atilla Halil Elhan, Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci
Objective: Primary aim was to investigate the effects of upper extremity (UE) robot-assisted training (RAT), applied in addition to conventional rehabilitation program, on cognitive functions after stroke. Secondary aim was to investigate its effects on UE motor functions and activities, hand dexterity, and daily living activities.
Design: 40 post-acute stroke patients were randomized into robotic (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. All patients received a conventional rehabilitation program for 6 weeks, total 30 sessions. The robotic group received additional RAT to the affected UE by exoskeleton robotic system at each session. Cognitive functions (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), UE motor functions (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity), UE activities (Motor Activity Log-28), hand dexterity (Box and Block Test), and daily living activities (Functional Independence Measure) were assessed before and after the treatment, and at 3-month follow-up.
Results: Both groups showed significant improvements regarding primary and secondary outcomes (p < 0,05). However, improvements in all outcome measures did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0,0167).
Conclusions: UE RAT applied in addition to conventional rehabilitation program in post-acute stroke provided no extra benefit in terms of improvements in cognitive functions, as well as UE extremity motor functions and activities, hand dexterity, and daily living activities.
{"title":"The Effects of Robot-Assisted Upper Extremity Training on Cognitive and Physical Functions in Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Merve Çetin, Seçilay Güneş, Atilla Halil Elhan, Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary aim was to investigate the effects of upper extremity (UE) robot-assisted training (RAT), applied in addition to conventional rehabilitation program, on cognitive functions after stroke. Secondary aim was to investigate its effects on UE motor functions and activities, hand dexterity, and daily living activities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>40 post-acute stroke patients were randomized into robotic (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. All patients received a conventional rehabilitation program for 6 weeks, total 30 sessions. The robotic group received additional RAT to the affected UE by exoskeleton robotic system at each session. Cognitive functions (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), UE motor functions (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity), UE activities (Motor Activity Log-28), hand dexterity (Box and Block Test), and daily living activities (Functional Independence Measure) were assessed before and after the treatment, and at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements regarding primary and secondary outcomes (p < 0,05). However, improvements in all outcome measures did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0,0167).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UE RAT applied in addition to conventional rehabilitation program in post-acute stroke provided no extra benefit in terms of improvements in cognitive functions, as well as UE extremity motor functions and activities, hand dexterity, and daily living activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}