首页 > 最新文献

American heart journal最新文献

英文 中文
Safety of a remote disease management program to improve sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prescribing in type 2 diabetes with elevated cardiovascular or kidney risk. 改善钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在心血管或肾脏风险升高的2型糖尿病处方中的远程疾病管理项目的安全性
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107359
Lee-Shing Chang, Shahzad Hassan, Jacqueline Chasse, Gretchen Stern, Daniel Gabovitch, David Zelle, Caitlin Colling, Jennifer Crossen, Samuel J Aronson, Michael Oates, Christian Figueroa, Emma Collins, Ryan Ruggiero, Jorge Plutzky, Thomas A Gaziano, Christopher P Cannon, Deborah J Wexler, Benjamin M Scirica, Alexander J Blood
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) reduce cardiovascular and kidney risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet real-world use remains suboptimal. Remote care models offer a promising approach to improve access; there is limited data on the safety of and adverse events (AEs) associated with prescribing and titrating these therapies through a protocol-driven remote management program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DRIVE trial was a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety of a remote disease management program that initiated SGLT2i and/or GLP1 RA in patients with T2D and elevated cardiovascular or kidney risk. Participants were enrolled at a large integrated health care system in Massachusetts between March 2021 and December 2022. Participants were randomized to one of two implementation strategies: a sequential approach (two months of education first followed by medication initiation) or a bundled approach (simultaneous education and medication initiation). Non-clinical navigators and clinical pharmacists, supervised by physicians, oversaw medication initiation and monitoring under a collaborative drug therapy management agreement and protocol that included algorithms for initiation and titration of SGLT2i and GLP1 RA, as well as adjustment of concurrent glucose-lowering medications to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia Safety outcomes were collected through chart review and patient report, including targeted AEs, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and urgent care visits. Targeted AEs were prospectively collected over the first six months after enrollment: for SGLT2i initiators, symptoms of genital mycotic infection, urinary tract infection, or volume depletion; for GLP 1 RA initiators, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and urgent care visits over the first six months after enrollment were retrospectively collected through electronic health record review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 200 participants enrolled, 106 (53%) initiated SGLT2i (n=68) or GLP1 RA (n=40). Among SGLT2i users, 29.4% reported an AE, most commonly genital mycotic infections (10.3%) and symptoms of volume depletion (11.8%); 10.3% discontinued due to AEs. Among GLP1 RA users, 55.0% experienced AEs, predominantly gastrointestinal; 10.0% discontinued due to AEs. No severe hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A remote, pharmacist- and navigator-led program safely initiated SGLT2i and GLP1 RA in a high-risk T2D population, with AE rates comparable to clinical trials and high persistence. These findings support the feasibility of remote prescribing with appropriate clinical oversight and structured AE management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; URL: https://clinicaltr
背景:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1 RA)可降低2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心血管和肾脏风险,但实际应用仍不理想。远程护理模式提供了一种改善访问的有希望的方法;通过协议驱动的远程管理程序,关于这些疗法的处方和滴定的安全性和不良事件(ae)的数据有限。方法:DRIVE试验是一项实用的随机临床试验,评估远程疾病管理项目的安全性,该项目启动SGLT2i和/或GLP1 RA,用于T2D和心血管或肾脏风险升高的患者。参与者在2021年3月至2022年12月期间在马萨诸塞州的一个大型综合医疗保健系统注册。参与者被随机分配到两种实施策略之一:顺序方法(首先进行两个月的教育,然后开始用药)或捆绑方法(同时进行教育和开始用药)。非临床导航员和临床药师在医生的监督下,根据合作药物治疗管理协议和方案监督药物的启动和监测,包括SGLT2i和GLP1 RA的启动和滴定算法,以及调整同时使用的降糖药物以降低低血糖的风险。急诊科访问和紧急护理访问。在入组后的前6个月内前瞻性收集目标ae:针对SGLT2i启动者、生殖器真菌感染、尿路感染或容量减少的症状;用于glp1ra启动剂,恶心,呕吐,腹泻和腹痛。通过电子健康记录回顾回顾性收集入组后前6个月的住院情况、急诊科就诊情况和紧急护理就诊情况。结果:在纳入的200名参与者中,106名(53%)接受了SGLT2i (n=68)或GLP1 RA (n=40)的治疗。在sgltti使用者中,29.4%报告了AE,最常见的是生殖器真菌感染(10.3%)和体积耗损症状(11.8%);10.3%因ae而停药。在GLP1 RA使用者中,55.0%经历ae,主要是胃肠道ae;10.0%因ae停产。无严重低血糖、急诊或住院。结论:一个远程的,由药剂师和导航员主导的项目在高危T2D人群中安全地启动了SGLT2i和GLP1 RA, AE率与临床试验相当,并且持久性高。这些研究结果支持远程处方的可行性,并辅以适当的临床监督和结构化的AE管理。试验注册:注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06046560;唯一标识符:NCT06046560。
{"title":"Safety of a remote disease management program to improve sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prescribing in type 2 diabetes with elevated cardiovascular or kidney risk.","authors":"Lee-Shing Chang, Shahzad Hassan, Jacqueline Chasse, Gretchen Stern, Daniel Gabovitch, David Zelle, Caitlin Colling, Jennifer Crossen, Samuel J Aronson, Michael Oates, Christian Figueroa, Emma Collins, Ryan Ruggiero, Jorge Plutzky, Thomas A Gaziano, Christopher P Cannon, Deborah J Wexler, Benjamin M Scirica, Alexander J Blood","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107359","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) reduce cardiovascular and kidney risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet real-world use remains suboptimal. Remote care models offer a promising approach to improve access; there is limited data on the safety of and adverse events (AEs) associated with prescribing and titrating these therapies through a protocol-driven remote management program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The DRIVE trial was a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety of a remote disease management program that initiated SGLT2i and/or GLP1 RA in patients with T2D and elevated cardiovascular or kidney risk. Participants were enrolled at a large integrated health care system in Massachusetts between March 2021 and December 2022. Participants were randomized to one of two implementation strategies: a sequential approach (two months of education first followed by medication initiation) or a bundled approach (simultaneous education and medication initiation). Non-clinical navigators and clinical pharmacists, supervised by physicians, oversaw medication initiation and monitoring under a collaborative drug therapy management agreement and protocol that included algorithms for initiation and titration of SGLT2i and GLP1 RA, as well as adjustment of concurrent glucose-lowering medications to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia Safety outcomes were collected through chart review and patient report, including targeted AEs, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and urgent care visits. Targeted AEs were prospectively collected over the first six months after enrollment: for SGLT2i initiators, symptoms of genital mycotic infection, urinary tract infection, or volume depletion; for GLP 1 RA initiators, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and urgent care visits over the first six months after enrollment were retrospectively collected through electronic health record review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 200 participants enrolled, 106 (53%) initiated SGLT2i (n=68) or GLP1 RA (n=40). Among SGLT2i users, 29.4% reported an AE, most commonly genital mycotic infections (10.3%) and symptoms of volume depletion (11.8%); 10.3% discontinued due to AEs. Among GLP1 RA users, 55.0% experienced AEs, predominantly gastrointestinal; 10.0% discontinued due to AEs. No severe hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations occurred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;A remote, pharmacist- and navigator-led program safely initiated SGLT2i and GLP1 RA in a high-risk T2D population, with AE rates comparable to clinical trials and high persistence. These findings support the feasibility of remote prescribing with appropriate clinical oversight and structured AE management.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trial registration: &lt;/strong&gt;Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; URL: https://clinicaltr","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study Evaluating Dexmedetomidine in the Acute Treatment of Electrical storm (SEDATE): rationale and design. 评价右美托咪定急性治疗电风暴(SEDATE)的研究:理论基础和设计。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107358
Pouya Motazedian, Pietro Di Santo, Graeme Prosperi-Porta, David Nelson, Baylie Morgan, Colleen Ratelle, Hannah Feagan, Zandra Koopman, Richard Jung, Marie-Eve Mathieu, William Knoll, Simon Parlow, Omar Abdel-Razek, Rebecca Mathew, George A Wells, Michael H Chiu, Brennan Ballantyne, Benjamin Hibbert, F Daniel Ramirez

Background: Electrical storm (ES) is a clinical syndrome characterized by densely clustered ventricular arrhythmias, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Autonomic dysfunction is thought to play key role in the pathophysiology of ES, with sympathetic blockade considered a therapeutic target. However, robust data supporting this treatment strategy remains limited. The objective of the SEDATE trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine in the acute management of ES.

Methods and design: SEDATE is a multi-center, double-blinded, randomized trial comparing dexmedetomidine to placebo in the acute treatment of patients with ES. A total of 192 participants admitted to an intensive care unit with ES will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either dexmedetomidine or placebo. Participants will undergo a study drug titration phase, followed by a 48-hour maintenance period and a subsequent study drug weaning phase. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause in-hospital mortality and/or recurrent ventricular arrhythmia prompting intervention. All participants will be followed for the duration of their hospitalization.

Implication: The SEDATE clinical trial aims to determine whether early use of dexmedetomidine improves in-hospital outcomes in patients with ES.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT06281977.

背景:电风暴(ES)是一种以密集聚集性室性心律失常为特征的临床综合征,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。自主神经功能障碍被认为在ES的病理生理中起关键作用,交感神经阻滞被认为是治疗靶点。然而,支持这种治疗策略的可靠数据仍然有限。SEDATE试验的目的是评估右美托咪定在ES急性治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法和设计:SEDATE是一项多中心、双盲、随机试验,比较右美托咪定和安慰剂在ES患者急性治疗中的作用。共有192名ES患者入住重症监护病房,将以1:1的比例随机分配,接受右美托咪定或安慰剂治疗。参与者将经历一个研究药物滴定阶段,随后是48小时的维持期和随后的研究药物断奶阶段。主要转归是全因住院死亡率和/或复发性室性心律失常促使干预的综合结果。所有参与者在住院期间都将被跟踪。意义:SEDATE临床试验旨在确定早期使用右美托咪定是否能改善ES患者的住院预后。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov NCT06281977。
{"title":"Study Evaluating Dexmedetomidine in the Acute Treatment of Electrical storm (SEDATE): rationale and design.","authors":"Pouya Motazedian, Pietro Di Santo, Graeme Prosperi-Porta, David Nelson, Baylie Morgan, Colleen Ratelle, Hannah Feagan, Zandra Koopman, Richard Jung, Marie-Eve Mathieu, William Knoll, Simon Parlow, Omar Abdel-Razek, Rebecca Mathew, George A Wells, Michael H Chiu, Brennan Ballantyne, Benjamin Hibbert, F Daniel Ramirez","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107358","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrical storm (ES) is a clinical syndrome characterized by densely clustered ventricular arrhythmias, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Autonomic dysfunction is thought to play key role in the pathophysiology of ES, with sympathetic blockade considered a therapeutic target. However, robust data supporting this treatment strategy remains limited. The objective of the SEDATE trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine in the acute management of ES.</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>SEDATE is a multi-center, double-blinded, randomized trial comparing dexmedetomidine to placebo in the acute treatment of patients with ES. A total of 192 participants admitted to an intensive care unit with ES will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either dexmedetomidine or placebo. Participants will undergo a study drug titration phase, followed by a 48-hour maintenance period and a subsequent study drug weaning phase. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause in-hospital mortality and/or recurrent ventricular arrhythmia prompting intervention. All participants will be followed for the duration of their hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Implication: </strong>The SEDATE clinical trial aims to determine whether early use of dexmedetomidine improves in-hospital outcomes in patients with ES.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov NCT06281977.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrated Care Management for Older Multimorbid Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics for the Atrial Fibrillation Integrated Approach in Frail, Multimorbid and Polymedicated Older People (AFFIRMO) trial. 老年多病房颤患者的综合护理管理:虚弱、多病、多药老年人房颤综合治疗方法的基本原理、设计和基线特征(AFFIRMO)试验
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107356
Marco Proietti, Gregory Y H Lip, John Ainsworth, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan, Lars Frost, Guendalina Graffigna, Donata Lucci, Francisco Marin, Tatjana S Potpara, Alam Sanaullah, Mariya Tokmakova, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Aldo Pietro Maggioni

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in older people, with an increasing prevalence of various geriatric conditions, such as multimorbidity and frailty. A contemporary integrated approach is effective in reducing the risk of clinical adverse events, particularly when streamlined through the application of the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway, as proven in two non-European trials.

Methods: The AFFIRMO trial, a European multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised study, will examine whether a mobile-health integrated care approach based on the ABC pathway combined with a multidimensional Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can reduce the 12-month risk of unplanned all-cause hospitalisations in patients with AF ≥65 years with ≥1 concomitant chronic condition(s).

Results: The AFFIRMO trial enrolled 1,260 patients with AF (mean age 74 (SD 6) years; 44.4% female) across six European countries (Bulgaria, Denmark, Italy, Romania, Serbia, and Spain). At baseline, the median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 [3-5], and the median [IQR] HAS-BLED score was 1 [1-2]. Hypertension was reported in 992 (78.7%) patients, and diabetes mellitus in 369 (29.3%) patients. Among the enrolled patients, 507 (40.5%) were pre-frail, and 171 (13.7%) were frail. OACs were prescribed for 1,225 (97.2%) patients, with 1,149 (91.2%) patients receiving NOACs. Follow-up is ongoing and planned to be completed in January 2026.

Conclusions: The AFFIRMO trial will provide evidence on the efficacy of the ABC pathway in conjunction with the CGA approach in reducing the risk of unplanned all-cause hospitalisations and other clinical adverse events in older, multimorbid patients with AF.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06775028.

房颤(AF)是老年人最常见的心律失常,随着各种老年疾病的患病率增加,如多病和虚弱。当代综合方法在降低临床不良事件风险方面是有效的,特别是当通过应用心房颤动更好的护理(ABC)途径进行简化时,两项非欧洲试验证明了这一点。方法:欧洲多中心、开放标签、聚类随机研究AFFIRMO试验将检验基于ABC途径结合多维综合老年病学评估(CGA)的移动健康综合护理方法是否可以降低≥65岁伴有≥1种慢性疾病的AF患者12个月非计划全因住院的风险。结果:AFFIRMO试验纳入1260例房颤患者(平均年龄74岁(SD 6)岁;44.4%女性),分布在六个欧洲国家(保加利亚、丹麦、意大利、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚和西班牙)。基线时,CHA2DS2-VASc [IQR]中位评分为4 [3-5],HAS-BLED [IQR]中位评分为1[1-2]。高血压992例(78.7%),糖尿病369例(29.3%)。在纳入的患者中,507例(40.5%)为体弱前期,171例(13.7%)为体弱。1225例(97.2%)患者开了oac, 1149例(91.2%)患者接受了noac。后续工作正在进行中,计划于2026年1月完成。结论:AFFIRMO试验将为ABC途径联合CGA方法在降低老年多病af患者意外全因住院和其他临床不良事件风险方面的有效性提供证据。
{"title":"Integrated Care Management for Older Multimorbid Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics for the Atrial Fibrillation Integrated Approach in Frail, Multimorbid and Polymedicated Older People (AFFIRMO) trial.","authors":"Marco Proietti, Gregory Y H Lip, John Ainsworth, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan, Lars Frost, Guendalina Graffigna, Donata Lucci, Francisco Marin, Tatjana S Potpara, Alam Sanaullah, Mariya Tokmakova, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Aldo Pietro Maggioni","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in older people, with an increasing prevalence of various geriatric conditions, such as multimorbidity and frailty. A contemporary integrated approach is effective in reducing the risk of clinical adverse events, particularly when streamlined through the application of the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway, as proven in two non-European trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AFFIRMO trial, a European multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised study, will examine whether a mobile-health integrated care approach based on the ABC pathway combined with a multidimensional Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can reduce the 12-month risk of unplanned all-cause hospitalisations in patients with AF ≥65 years with ≥1 concomitant chronic condition(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AFFIRMO trial enrolled 1,260 patients with AF (mean age 74 (SD 6) years; 44.4% female) across six European countries (Bulgaria, Denmark, Italy, Romania, Serbia, and Spain). At baseline, the median [IQR] CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 4 [3-5], and the median [IQR] HAS-BLED score was 1 [1-2]. Hypertension was reported in 992 (78.7%) patients, and diabetes mellitus in 369 (29.3%) patients. Among the enrolled patients, 507 (40.5%) were pre-frail, and 171 (13.7%) were frail. OACs were prescribed for 1,225 (97.2%) patients, with 1,149 (91.2%) patients receiving NOACs. Follow-up is ongoing and planned to be completed in January 2026.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AFFIRMO trial will provide evidence on the efficacy of the ABC pathway in conjunction with the CGA approach in reducing the risk of unplanned all-cause hospitalisations and other clinical adverse events in older, multimorbid patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06775028.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146043691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Outcomes of Off-Label Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair/Replacement in the STS/ACC TVT Registry. STS/ACC TVT登记中经导管三尖瓣修复/置换术的早期结果
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107355
Andrew M Vekstein, Husam M Salah, Amanda Stebbins, Zachary Wegermann, George Sipa Yankey, Andrzej Kosinski, Andrew Wang, Suzanne Arnold, David Cohen, Paul Sorajja, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Wayne Batchelor, Vinod Thourani, Sreekanth Vemulapalli

Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have expanded with the recent FDA approval of both replacement (TTVR) and edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) devices. However, the volume and outcomes of commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures are unknown. Herein, we describe institutional volume and patient characteristics for commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures in the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapies (TVT) registry, and assess 30-day and 1-year outcomes, including quality of life.

Methods: Patients undergoing isolated TTVR or T-TEER for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) without stenosis were identified. The primary outcomes were residual TR severity and change in KCCQ-OS at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, vascular/bleeding complications, heart failure readmission, tricuspid reintervention, and 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated mortality.

Results: A total of 995 tricuspid procedures were performed at 142 sites from 01/2021 to 12/2023, including 238 TTVR (primarily valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring) and 757 T-TEER. 72% of sites performed 5 or fewer procedures, while 4 high-volume centers performed 49, 81, 94, and 120 procedures, respectively. Among TTVR patients (median age 60), 97% had ≤ moderate residual TR at 30 days; 61% had substantial improvement and 14% had moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.9% and 19% respectively. Among T-TEER patients (median age 78), 74% had ≤ moderate residual TR; 54% had substantial improvement and 17% moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.0% and 18%, respectively.

Conclusions: Off-label use of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions was highly variable across institutions, with the majority of institutions performing <5 procedures, while others performed >100. Both T-TEER and TTVR reduced residual TR to ≤ moderate in the majority of cases and were associated with substantial improvements in quality of life.

背景:经导管三尖瓣干预已经扩大,最近FDA批准了两种替代(TTVR)和边缘到边缘修复(T-TEER)装置。然而,商业化、非标签TTVR和T-TEER手术的数量和结果尚不清楚。在本文中,我们描述了STS/ACC经导管瓣膜治疗(TVT)注册中商业化、非标签TTVR和T-TEER手术的机构数量和患者特征,并评估了30天和1年的结果,包括生活质量。方法:对无狭窄的三尖瓣反流(TR)患者进行单独TTVR或T-TEER治疗。主要结局是30天时残余TR严重程度和KCCQ-OS的变化。次要结局包括30天死亡率、血管/出血并发症、心力衰竭再入院、三尖瓣再干预和1年Kaplan-Meier估计死亡率。结果:从2021年1月1日至2023年12月,共在142个部位进行了995例三尖瓣手术,其中包括238例TTVR(主要是瓣膜内或瓣膜内环)和757例T-TEER。72%的中心进行了5次或更少的手术,而4个大容量中心分别进行了49次、81次、94次和120次手术。在TTVR患者(中位年龄60岁)中,97%在30天的残余TR≤中度;61%的患者KCCQ-OS有明显改善,14%的患者KCCQ-OS有中度改善。30天和1年估计死亡率分别为3.9%和19%。在T-TEER患者(中位年龄78岁)中,74%的患者残留TR≤中度;54%的患者KCCQ-OS有明显改善,17%有中度改善。30天和1年估计死亡率分别为3.0%和18%。结论:经导管三尖瓣干预的说明书外使用在各机构之间差异很大,大多数机构执行100。在大多数病例中,T-TEER和TTVR均可将残余TR降低至≤中度,并与生活质量的显著改善相关。
{"title":"Early Outcomes of Off-Label Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair/Replacement in the STS/ACC TVT Registry.","authors":"Andrew M Vekstein, Husam M Salah, Amanda Stebbins, Zachary Wegermann, George Sipa Yankey, Andrzej Kosinski, Andrew Wang, Suzanne Arnold, David Cohen, Paul Sorajja, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Wayne Batchelor, Vinod Thourani, Sreekanth Vemulapalli","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have expanded with the recent FDA approval of both replacement (TTVR) and edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) devices. However, the volume and outcomes of commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures are unknown. Herein, we describe institutional volume and patient characteristics for commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures in the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapies (TVT) registry, and assess 30-day and 1-year outcomes, including quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing isolated TTVR or T-TEER for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) without stenosis were identified. The primary outcomes were residual TR severity and change in KCCQ-OS at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, vascular/bleeding complications, heart failure readmission, tricuspid reintervention, and 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 995 tricuspid procedures were performed at 142 sites from 01/2021 to 12/2023, including 238 TTVR (primarily valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring) and 757 T-TEER. 72% of sites performed 5 or fewer procedures, while 4 high-volume centers performed 49, 81, 94, and 120 procedures, respectively. Among TTVR patients (median age 60), 97% had ≤ moderate residual TR at 30 days; 61% had substantial improvement and 14% had moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.9% and 19% respectively. Among T-TEER patients (median age 78), 74% had ≤ moderate residual TR; 54% had substantial improvement and 17% moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.0% and 18%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Off-label use of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions was highly variable across institutions, with the majority of institutions performing <5 procedures, while others performed >100. Both T-TEER and TTVR reduced residual TR to ≤ moderate in the majority of cases and were associated with substantial improvements in quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146016822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staged interventional strategies for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patient with multi-vessel disease: Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized STAGED trial. 急性st段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管疾病的分期介入治疗策略:一项多中心、随机分期试验的基本原理和设计
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107352
Xiang Chen, Suiji Li, Bin Wang, Geng Chen, Yaner Yao, Yuquan He, Xinhua Wu, Youdong Yang, Huiyuan Kang, Licheng Ding, Ye Cheng, Qiusheng Shen, Haijun Guo, Jinping Wang, Shangyu Wen, Li Zhu, Yulong Xing, Qian Tong, Ping Li, Yin Liu, Xiaoping Peng, Shao-Liang Chen, Yan Wang

Background: Complete revascularization (CR) has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared with culprit-only revascularization (COR) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD). However, the optimal timing of staged complete revascularization (SCR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.

Trial design: The STAGED trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized study involving 37 sites, aiming to include 1,586 acute STEMI patients with MVD undergoing successful primary PCI of the culprit lesion followed by SCR. Eligible patients will be assigned to two groups based on the timing of SCR: early-staged PCI and delayed-staged PCI. The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac event (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization for both culprit and non-culprit vessels at 12 months since the randomization. The secondary endpoint is individual components of primary endpoint, all-cause death, heart failure-related rehospitalization, stroke, contrast-induced nephropathy, and radiation exposure dose . Follow-up will be conducted through clinic visits or telephone interviews at 1, 3, and 12 months after the index procedure.

Conclusion: The STAGED trial is the first randomized controlled study specifically designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different timing strategies for SCR in acute STEMI patients with MVD.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04918030.

背景:在急性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)合并多血管疾病(MVD)患者中,完全血运重建术(CR)已被证明比单纯的罪魁祸首血运重建术(COR)可降低不良心血管事件的风险。然而,原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后分期完全血运重建术(SCR)的最佳时机仍不清楚。试验设计:分阶段试验是一项研究者发起的、多中心、随机研究,涉及37个地点,旨在纳入1,586例急性STEMI合并MVD患者,这些患者成功地对罪魁祸首病变进行了首次PCI治疗,随后进行了SCR。符合条件的患者将根据SCR的时间分配到两组:早期PCI和延迟PCI。主要终点是主要心脏不良事件(MACE),包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死或缺血驱动的罪魁祸首和非罪魁祸首血管在随机分组后12个月的血运重建。次要终点是主要终点的各个组成部分、全因死亡、心力衰竭相关的再住院、中风、造影剂肾病和辐射暴露剂量。随访将在索引程序后1、3和12个月通过诊所访问或电话访谈进行。结论:分期试验是第一个专门设计的随机对照研究,旨在评估急性STEMI合并MVD患者不同时间策略的SCR的临床疗效和安全性。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04918030。
{"title":"Staged interventional strategies for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patient with multi-vessel disease: Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized STAGED trial.","authors":"Xiang Chen, Suiji Li, Bin Wang, Geng Chen, Yaner Yao, Yuquan He, Xinhua Wu, Youdong Yang, Huiyuan Kang, Licheng Ding, Ye Cheng, Qiusheng Shen, Haijun Guo, Jinping Wang, Shangyu Wen, Li Zhu, Yulong Xing, Qian Tong, Ping Li, Yin Liu, Xiaoping Peng, Shao-Liang Chen, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete revascularization (CR) has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared with culprit-only revascularization (COR) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD). However, the optimal timing of staged complete revascularization (SCR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Trial design: </strong>The STAGED trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized study involving 37 sites, aiming to include 1,586 acute STEMI patients with MVD undergoing successful primary PCI of the culprit lesion followed by SCR. Eligible patients will be assigned to two groups based on the timing of SCR: early-staged PCI and delayed-staged PCI. The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac event (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization for both culprit and non-culprit vessels at 12 months since the randomization. The secondary endpoint is individual components of primary endpoint, all-cause death, heart failure-related rehospitalization, stroke, contrast-induced nephropathy, and radiation exposure dose . Follow-up will be conducted through clinic visits or telephone interviews at 1, 3, and 12 months after the index procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The STAGED trial is the first randomized controlled study specifically designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different timing strategies for SCR in acute STEMI patients with MVD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04918030.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accuracy of site versus core laboratory interpretations of right heart catheterization hemodynamics. 右心导管血流动力学位点与核心实验室解释的准确性。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107351
Omar Cantu-Martinez, Marat Fudim, David F Kong, Ryan J Tedford, Philip G Jones, Andrew J Sauer, Timothy J Fendler, John A Spertus

An accurate interpretation of hemodynamics measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) is crucial for guiding the management of heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the concordance and variability between site-reported and core laboratory-adjudicated interpretations of invasive hemodynamic measurements.

正确解释右心导管(RHC)测量的血流动力学对指导心力衰竭和肺动脉高压的治疗至关重要。我们评估了现场报告和核心实验室判定的有创血流动力学测量解释之间的一致性和可变性。
{"title":"Accuracy of site versus core laboratory interpretations of right heart catheterization hemodynamics.","authors":"Omar Cantu-Martinez, Marat Fudim, David F Kong, Ryan J Tedford, Philip G Jones, Andrew J Sauer, Timothy J Fendler, John A Spertus","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107351","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An accurate interpretation of hemodynamics measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) is crucial for guiding the management of heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the concordance and variability between site-reported and core laboratory-adjudicated interpretations of invasive hemodynamic measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Performance of Large Language Models on Cardiovascular Certification Simulation Exam. 大型语言模型在心血管认证模拟考试中的比较性能。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107353
Eesha Nachnani, Kashish Goel, Alexander E Sullivan

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly prevalent in medical practice and has demonstrated sufficient clinical acumen to pass several licensing examinations. We tested the ability of three popular large-language models, ChatGPT-4.0 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Bing AI (Microsoft), to pass a cardiovascular medicine board-style exam. Of these AI platforms, only ChatGPT-4.0 was able to achieve a score similar to human participants.

人工智能(AI)在医疗实践中变得越来越普遍,并且已经表现出足够的临床敏锐度,可以通过几个许可考试。我们测试了三种流行的大语言模型——ChatGPT-4.0 (OpenAI)、Gemini(谷歌)和Bing AI(微软)——通过心血管医学委员会式考试的能力。在这些人工智能平台中,只有ChatGPT-4.0能够达到与人类参与者相似的分数。
{"title":"Comparative Performance of Large Language Models on Cardiovascular Certification Simulation Exam.","authors":"Eesha Nachnani, Kashish Goel, Alexander E Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107353","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly prevalent in medical practice and has demonstrated sufficient clinical acumen to pass several licensing examinations. We tested the ability of three popular large-language models, ChatGPT-4.0 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Bing AI (Microsoft), to pass a cardiovascular medicine board-style exam. Of these AI platforms, only ChatGPT-4.0 was able to achieve a score similar to human participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Information for Readers 读者资讯
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(26)00008-6
{"title":"Information for Readers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0002-8703(26)00008-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0002-8703(26)00008-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"293 ","pages":"Article 107346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145921040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design and rationale of the GUARD-OAC: A randomized controlled trial evaluating proton pump inhibitor cotherapy for gastrointestinal protection in patients requiring direct oral anticoagulants GUARD-OAC的设计和基本原理:一项随机对照试验,评估质子泵抑制剂协同治疗对需要直接口服抗凝剂的患者的胃肠道保护作用。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107341
Hyo-Jeong Ahn , So-Ryoung Lee , Soonil Kwon , Tae-Min Rhee , Young Soo Lee , Sang-Jin Han , Ki-Woon Kang , Jaemin Shim , Hee Tae Yu , Il-Young Oh , Hyoung-Seob Park , Jin-Kyu Park , Sung-Won Jang , Sung Ho Lee , Seung-Young Roh , Kwang Jin Chun , Hyung Wook Park , Kyung-Yeon Lee , Seil Oh , Eue-Keun Choi

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of thromboembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, or other cardiovascular conditions. However, DOAC use is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding being the most common site of major bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are reasonably used during combined antithrombotic therapy or based on individual bleeding risk; nonetheless, evidence supporting their benefit in patients receiving DOAC therapy remains limited.

Methods

The Gastrointestinal protection Using proton-pump inhibitor in pAtients who RequireD Oral AntiCoagulants (GUARD-OAC) trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating the GI protective effect of PPI coadministration with DOAC. Eligible participants are patients with cardio- or cerebrovascular disease requiring long-term anticoagulation (≥1 year), who are currently receiving or initiating DOAC therapy, and have a HAS-BLED score of ≥1. The primary outcome is a composite of upper GI clinical events, including bleeding, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer, persistent pain of presumed GI origin with underlying multiple erosive disease, obstruction, or perforation. The secondary outcomes are the individual components of the primary outcome, GI symptoms or signs, cardiovascular or all bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. Assuming a 40% relative risk reduction of the primary outcome in the PPI plus DOAC group compared to the DOAC alone group, a total of 3,846 patients will be enrolled and followed for one year. A Clinical Events Committee will adjudicate clinical outcomes and adverse events for causality and attribution, and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee the study. The GUARD-OAC trial is funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Conclusions

The GUARD-OAC trial is the first randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of PPI cotherapy in patients receiving DOACs, providing evidence that may inform future guidelines on GI protection in this population.

Trial registration

Clinical Research Information Service, Identifier KCT0006848.
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)是房颤、静脉血栓栓塞或其他心血管疾病患者血栓栓塞预防的基石。然而,DOAC的使用与出血风险增加有关,胃肠道出血是最常见的大出血部位。质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在联合抗血栓治疗或基于个体出血风险合理使用;尽管如此,支持它们对接受DOAC治疗的患者有益的证据仍然有限。方法:质子泵抑制剂对口服抗凝剂患者的胃肠保护(GUARD-OAC)试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,旨在评估PPI与DOAC合用对胃肠道的保护作用。符合条件的参与者是需要长期抗凝治疗(≥1年)的心脑血管疾病患者,目前正在接受或正在启动DOAC治疗,且HAS-BLED评分≥1。主要结局是上消化道临床事件的综合,包括出血、症状性胃十二指肠溃疡、推定为胃肠道起源的持续疼痛,并伴有潜在的多发性糜烂性疾病、梗阻或穿孔。次要结局是主要结局的个别组成部分,胃肠道症状或体征,心血管或所有出血事件,以及全因死亡率。假设PPI + DOAC组与单独DOAC组相比,主要结局相对风险降低40%,总共3846例患者将被纳入并随访一年。临床事件委员会将判定临床结果和不良事件的因果关系和归因,独立的数据安全监测委员会将监督该研究。GUARD-OAC试验由大韩民国卫生和福利部资助。结论:GUARD-OAC试验是首个探索PPI协同治疗DOACs患者疗效的随机对照试验,为这一人群未来的GI保护指南提供了证据。试验注册:临床研究信息服务中心,标识符KCT0006848。
{"title":"Design and rationale of the GUARD-OAC: A randomized controlled trial evaluating proton pump inhibitor cotherapy for gastrointestinal protection in patients requiring direct oral anticoagulants","authors":"Hyo-Jeong Ahn ,&nbsp;So-Ryoung Lee ,&nbsp;Soonil Kwon ,&nbsp;Tae-Min Rhee ,&nbsp;Young Soo Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Jin Han ,&nbsp;Ki-Woon Kang ,&nbsp;Jaemin Shim ,&nbsp;Hee Tae Yu ,&nbsp;Il-Young Oh ,&nbsp;Hyoung-Seob Park ,&nbsp;Jin-Kyu Park ,&nbsp;Sung-Won Jang ,&nbsp;Sung Ho Lee ,&nbsp;Seung-Young Roh ,&nbsp;Kwang Jin Chun ,&nbsp;Hyung Wook Park ,&nbsp;Kyung-Yeon Lee ,&nbsp;Seil Oh ,&nbsp;Eue-Keun Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107341","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107341","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of thromboembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, or other cardiovascular conditions. However, DOAC use is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding being the most common site of major bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are reasonably used during combined antithrombotic therapy or based on individual bleeding risk; nonetheless, evidence supporting their benefit in patients receiving DOAC therapy remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Gastrointestinal protection Using proton-pump inhibitor in pAtients who RequireD Oral AntiCoagulants (GUARD-OAC) trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating the GI protective effect of PPI coadministration with DOAC. Eligible participants are patients with cardio- or cerebrovascular disease requiring long-term anticoagulation (≥1 year), who are currently receiving or initiating DOAC therapy, and have a HAS-BLED score of ≥1. The primary outcome is a composite of upper GI clinical events, including bleeding, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer, persistent pain of presumed GI origin with underlying multiple erosive disease, obstruction, or perforation. The secondary outcomes are the individual components of the primary outcome, GI symptoms or signs, cardiovascular or all bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. Assuming a 40% relative risk reduction of the primary outcome in the PPI plus DOAC group compared to the DOAC alone group, a total of 3,846 patients will be enrolled and followed for one year. A Clinical Events Committee will adjudicate clinical outcomes and adverse events for causality and attribution, and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee the study. The GUARD-OAC trial is funded by the Ministry of Health &amp; Welfare, Republic of Korea.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The GUARD-OAC trial is the first randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of PPI cotherapy in patients receiving DOACs, providing evidence that may inform future guidelines on GI protection in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Clinical Research Information Service, Identifier KCT0006848.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 107341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproductive health outcomes of congenital heart disease survivors: A report from the congenital heart disease project to understand lifelong survivor experience (CHD PULSE study) 先天性心脏病幸存者的生殖健康结果:一份来自先天性心脏病项目的报告,以了解终身幸存者的经历(CHD PULSE研究)。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107338
Sukran Erdem MD , Caroline Yunhua Shi PhD , Andrew Dailey Schwartz MD , Jesica Flores MD , Jessica Knight PhD , Osamah Aldoss MD , Susan C. Anderson BA , Charles E. Canter MD , Gurumurthy Hiremath MD , Tarique Hussain MD, PhD , Anitha S. John MD, PhD , Bradley S. Marino MD , Kimberly E. McHugh MD , Geetha Raghuveer MD, MPH , Logan G. Spector PhD , James D. St Louis MD , Lazaros Kochilas MD , Matthew E. Oster MD , Mansi Gaitonde MD

Background

Improved survival of individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) into adulthood has made reproductive health a crucial aspect of CHD care. Despite existing guidelines on heritability, contraception, pregnancy, and postpartum care, little is known about CHD survivors’ experiences and attitudes toward reproductive health. This study aimed to examine reproductive health outcomes and experiences among adults with CHD, with a focus on female survivors.

Methods

Data were drawn from the CHD PULSE (Project to Understand Lifelong Survivor Experience) study, a cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2021 to April 2023. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with at least 1 CHD intervention at 1 of 11 U.S. Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium centers. CHD severity was categorized based on initial diagnosis and intervention. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively.

Results

Among 3,073 respondents (1,704 females, 1,369 males), 48% of female participants reported receiving no reproductive counseling. Factors significantly associated with receiving counseling included older age, later age at last surgery, marital history, severe CHD, higher income, government insurance, and more comorbidities (P < .001). Women were significantly more likely to have biological children than men (40.4% vs 37.5%, P < .0001).

Conclusion

Reproductive counseling is infrequent among women with CHD, especially among younger, unmarried, low-income individuals with less severe CHD and fewer comorbidities. Significant gender disparities in reproductive outcomes emphasize the need for tailored, gender-specific reproductive health counseling for CHD survivors.
背景:先天性心脏病(CHD)患者成人期存活率的提高使得生殖健康成为冠心病护理的一个重要方面。尽管已有关于遗传性、避孕、怀孕和产后护理的指导方针,但人们对冠心病幸存者的经历和对生殖健康的态度知之甚少。本研究旨在研究成年冠心病患者的生殖健康结果和经历,重点是女性幸存者。方法:数据来自2021年9月至2023年4月进行的CHD PULSE(了解终身幸存者经历项目)横断面调查。参与者为成人(≥18岁),在11个美国儿童心脏护理联盟中心中至少接受过一次冠心病干预。根据初始诊断和干预对冠心病严重程度进行分类。分类变量和连续变量分别采用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。结果:在3073名受访者中(1704名女性,1369名男性),48%的女性受访者表示没有接受过生殖咨询。与接受咨询显著相关的因素包括年龄较大、最后手术年龄较晚、婚姻史、严重冠心病、高收入、政府保险和更多合并症(P< 0.001)。女性有亲生子女的可能性明显高于男性(40.4%比37.5%,P< 0.0001)。结论:生殖咨询在冠心病女性中较少,尤其是在年轻、未婚、低收入且冠心病较轻且合并症较少的人群中。生殖结果的显著性别差异强调了为冠心病幸存者提供量身定制的、针对性别的生殖健康咨询的必要性。
{"title":"Reproductive health outcomes of congenital heart disease survivors: A report from the congenital heart disease project to understand lifelong survivor experience (CHD PULSE study)","authors":"Sukran Erdem MD ,&nbsp;Caroline Yunhua Shi PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Dailey Schwartz MD ,&nbsp;Jesica Flores MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Knight PhD ,&nbsp;Osamah Aldoss MD ,&nbsp;Susan C. Anderson BA ,&nbsp;Charles E. Canter MD ,&nbsp;Gurumurthy Hiremath MD ,&nbsp;Tarique Hussain MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anitha S. John MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley S. Marino MD ,&nbsp;Kimberly E. McHugh MD ,&nbsp;Geetha Raghuveer MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Logan G. Spector PhD ,&nbsp;James D. St Louis MD ,&nbsp;Lazaros Kochilas MD ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Oster MD ,&nbsp;Mansi Gaitonde MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107338","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107338","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Improved survival of individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) into adulthood has made reproductive health a crucial aspect of CHD care. Despite existing guidelines on heritability, contraception, pregnancy, and postpartum care, little is known about CHD survivors’ experiences and attitudes toward reproductive health. This study aimed to examine reproductive health outcomes and experiences among adults with CHD, with a focus on female survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were drawn from the CHD PULSE (Project to Understand Lifelong Survivor Experience) study, a cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2021 to April 2023. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with at least 1 CHD intervention at 1 of 11 U.S. Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium centers. CHD severity was categorized based on initial diagnosis and intervention. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3,073 respondents (1,704 females, 1,369 males), 48% of female participants reported receiving no reproductive counseling. Factors significantly associated with receiving counseling included older age, later age at last surgery, marital history, severe CHD, higher income, government insurance, and more comorbidities (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Women were significantly more likely to have biological children than men (40.4% vs 37.5%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reproductive counseling is infrequent among women with CHD, especially among younger, unmarried, low-income individuals with less severe CHD and fewer comorbidities. Significant gender disparities in reproductive outcomes emphasize the need for tailored, gender-specific reproductive health counseling for CHD survivors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American heart journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1