Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento MD, MSc , Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD , Marcos Venicius Malveira De Lima , Matheus de Freitas Itaborahy , Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, PhD , Brijesh Sathian MD, PhD , Holger Thiele MD, PhD , Bruno Ramos Nascimento
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is considered the main cause of mortality and morbidity for decades globally. Regularly, cardiology-related medical organizations publish clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to support healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of future cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the level of evidence (LOE) and classification of recommendations (CORs) endorsing STEMI-associated CPGs recommendations have not been systematically appraised.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This meta-research study evaluated and described the CORs and LOE over time for STEMI guidelines endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC), from 1990 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>We initially searched on PubMed and AHA/ACC/ESC electronic repositories to obtain STEMI-related CPGs, published from 1990 to 2023, including their immediate predecessors.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Guidelines related to acute in-hospital STEMI management were included; recommendations related to unstable angina/Non–STEMI were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Data management was performed by 2 content experts. Recommendations on pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions (PI and NPI, respectively) were extracted ipsilaterally, further processed and coded based on thematic analysis fundamentals. Recommendation's recordings associated with each recommendation were maintained as the primary guideline publication without team's specialist judgement. Pharmacological-related recommendations were categorized in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Changes in the proportion and LOE were evaluated longitudinally, using chi-square test (x<sup>2</sup>). Data visualization included heatmaps, linear plots, and Sankey diagrams.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Twenty-six guidelines (2,139 STEMI-specific recommendations) were evaluated. We observed an overall predominance of recommendations relying on moderate (proportion of 30.1% of LOE-B recommendations) or low (proportion of 28.9% of LOE-C recommendations) quality of evidence over the 33-year span. Only 17.7% of processed recommendations were based on high quality of evidence. Pharmacological interventions were more often LOE-A compared with NPI (21.5% vs 13.8%; <em>P</em>-value < 0.05). Most abstracted PI related to anticoagulants and dual anti-platelet therapies, while the most frequent category of NPI were related to percutaneous coronary interventions and implantable cardiac devices. Two consecutive guidelines comparison revealed that LOE and COR assigned to corresponding recommendation were minimal.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Restriction to only AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines and prim
{"title":"Coevolutionary analysis of evidence and recommendations in STEMI clinical practice guidelines: A 33-year meta-research study of ACC, AHA, and ESC","authors":"Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento MD, MSc , Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD , Marcos Venicius Malveira De Lima , Matheus de Freitas Itaborahy , Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, PhD , Brijesh Sathian MD, PhD , Holger Thiele MD, PhD , Bruno Ramos Nascimento","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is considered the main cause of mortality and morbidity for decades globally. Regularly, cardiology-related medical organizations publish clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to support healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of future cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the level of evidence (LOE) and classification of recommendations (CORs) endorsing STEMI-associated CPGs recommendations have not been systematically appraised.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This meta-research study evaluated and described the CORs and LOE over time for STEMI guidelines endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC), from 1990 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>We initially searched on PubMed and AHA/ACC/ESC electronic repositories to obtain STEMI-related CPGs, published from 1990 to 2023, including their immediate predecessors.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Guidelines related to acute in-hospital STEMI management were included; recommendations related to unstable angina/Non–STEMI were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Data management was performed by 2 content experts. Recommendations on pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions (PI and NPI, respectively) were extracted ipsilaterally, further processed and coded based on thematic analysis fundamentals. Recommendation's recordings associated with each recommendation were maintained as the primary guideline publication without team's specialist judgement. Pharmacological-related recommendations were categorized in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Changes in the proportion and LOE were evaluated longitudinally, using chi-square test (x<sup>2</sup>). Data visualization included heatmaps, linear plots, and Sankey diagrams.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Twenty-six guidelines (2,139 STEMI-specific recommendations) were evaluated. We observed an overall predominance of recommendations relying on moderate (proportion of 30.1% of LOE-B recommendations) or low (proportion of 28.9% of LOE-C recommendations) quality of evidence over the 33-year span. Only 17.7% of processed recommendations were based on high quality of evidence. Pharmacological interventions were more often LOE-A compared with NPI (21.5% vs 13.8%; <em>P</em>-value < 0.05). Most abstracted PI related to anticoagulants and dual anti-platelet therapies, while the most frequent category of NPI were related to percutaneous coronary interventions and implantable cardiac devices. Two consecutive guidelines comparison revealed that LOE and COR assigned to corresponding recommendation were minimal.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Restriction to only AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines and prim","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340
Balaji Tamarappoo MD, PhD , Rafal Wolny MD, PhD , Guadalupe Flores Tomasino MD , Daniel Berman MD , Eileen Handberg PhD , Carl J. Pepine MD , Margaret C. Lo MD , Matthew Budoff MD , Leslee Shaw PhD , Chrisandra Shufelt MD , Janet Wei MD , Martha Gulati MD, MS , C. Noel Bairey Merz MD , Damini Dey PhD
Background
Over 50% of women evaluated for suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in intermediate outcome trials; however, impact on coronary plaque has not been well characterized.
Objectives
The Women’s IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR NCT03417388) trial testing intensive medical therapy (IMT) (high intensity statin, ACEI or ARB and low dose aspirin) vs usual care (UC) in women with suspected INOCA offers the opportunity to evaluate the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and chest pain symptoms by coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We hypothesize that IMT provides beneficial data on plaque composition impacting flow reserve and trial outcomes.
Methods
This WARRIOR ancillary study will consecutively enroll 200 eligible participants randomized to IMT vs UC by baseline and exit CCTA. Changes in plaque and peri‑coronary artery adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT) characteristics will be quantified.
Results
Results will address: (1) Changes in coronary plaque characteristics and their hemodynamic significance using AI-enabled quantification of CCTA; (2) Changes in plaque inflammatory characteristics through pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density analysis; (3) Plaque burden, composition and PCAT density changes related to angina score (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]), (4) Derive a quantitative machine learning risk score (MLRS) using CCTA-derived variables for prediction of change in angina.
Conclusions
The ancillary study will be the first to quantify the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and outcomes in women with suspected INOCA.
Trial Registration
WARRIOR Ancillary Study for CCTA Analysis, NCT05035056
{"title":"Design and rationale of the WARRIOR ancillary study for coronary CT angiographic analysis","authors":"Balaji Tamarappoo MD, PhD , Rafal Wolny MD, PhD , Guadalupe Flores Tomasino MD , Daniel Berman MD , Eileen Handberg PhD , Carl J. Pepine MD , Margaret C. Lo MD , Matthew Budoff MD , Leslee Shaw PhD , Chrisandra Shufelt MD , Janet Wei MD , Martha Gulati MD, MS , C. Noel Bairey Merz MD , Damini Dey PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Over 50% of women evaluated for suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in intermediate outcome trials; however, impact on coronary plaque has not been well characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Women’s IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR NCT03417388) trial testing intensive medical therapy (IMT) (high intensity statin, ACEI or ARB and low dose aspirin) vs usual care (UC) in women with suspected INOCA offers the opportunity to evaluate the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and chest pain symptoms by coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We hypothesize that IMT provides beneficial data on plaque composition impacting flow reserve and trial outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This WARRIOR ancillary study will consecutively enroll 200 eligible participants randomized to IMT vs UC by baseline and exit CCTA. Changes in plaque and peri‑coronary artery adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT) characteristics will be quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results will address: (1) Changes in coronary plaque characteristics and their hemodynamic significance using AI-enabled quantification of CCTA; (2) Changes in plaque inflammatory characteristics through pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density analysis; (3) Plaque burden, composition and PCAT density changes related to angina score (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]), (4) Derive a quantitative machine learning risk score (MLRS) using CCTA-derived variables for prediction of change in angina.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The ancillary study will be the first to quantify the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and outcomes in women with suspected INOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>WARRIOR Ancillary Study for CCTA Analysis, NCT05035056</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-03DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339
Roberto Diletti MD, PhD , Joost Daemen MD, PhD , Benjamin Faurie MD , Marco Barbierato MD , Didier Tchetche MD , Thomas Hovasse MD , Koen Teeuwen MD, PhD , Rohit M. Oemrawsingh MD, PhD , Abdelhakim Allali MD, PhD , Gianluca Campo MD, PhD , Johan Bennett MD, PhD , Fernando Alfonso MD , Kambis Mashayekhi MD, PhD , Raul Moreno MD, PhD , Youssef S. Abdelwahed MD, PhD , Admir Dedic MD, PhD , Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez MD, PhD , John C. Murphy MB, BCH, MD, MRCP , Ignacio Amat-Santos MD, PhD , Joseph Dens MD, PhD , Nicolas M. Van Mieghem MD, PhD
Background
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in clinical events. Whereas most evidence is generated in Asian-Pacific populations, its global adoption remains low.
Methods
The IVUS complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP) trial is a multicenter, international, event-driven, randomized superiority trial comparing IVUS-guided PCI with angio-guided PCI during complex high-risk indicated procedures. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. The IVUS CHIP trial utilizes an event-driven approach. The outcomes for the primary endpoint are first reported when at least 169 patients with a primary endpoint have been confirmed. A total of 2020 patients will be enrolled in 37 European sites.
Conclusions
The aim of the IVUS CHIP trial is to assess the superiority of an IVUS-guided approach vs an angio-guided approach in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures in terms of the study primary endpoint of target vessel failure.
Trial Registration
The IVUS CHIP trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov and assigned the identifier NCT04854070.
{"title":"Intravascular ultrasound guidance for complex high-risk indicated procedures: The IVUS CHIP trial study design","authors":"Roberto Diletti MD, PhD , Joost Daemen MD, PhD , Benjamin Faurie MD , Marco Barbierato MD , Didier Tchetche MD , Thomas Hovasse MD , Koen Teeuwen MD, PhD , Rohit M. Oemrawsingh MD, PhD , Abdelhakim Allali MD, PhD , Gianluca Campo MD, PhD , Johan Bennett MD, PhD , Fernando Alfonso MD , Kambis Mashayekhi MD, PhD , Raul Moreno MD, PhD , Youssef S. Abdelwahed MD, PhD , Admir Dedic MD, PhD , Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez MD, PhD , John C. Murphy MB, BCH, MD, MRCP , Ignacio Amat-Santos MD, PhD , Joseph Dens MD, PhD , Nicolas M. Van Mieghem MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in clinical events. Whereas most evidence is generated in Asian-Pacific populations, its global adoption remains low.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The IVUS complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP) trial is a multicenter, international, event-driven, randomized superiority trial comparing IVUS-guided PCI with angio-guided PCI during complex high-risk indicated procedures. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. The IVUS CHIP trial utilizes an event-driven approach. The outcomes for the primary endpoint are first reported when at least 169 patients with a primary endpoint have been confirmed. A total of 2020 patients will be enrolled in 37 European sites.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The aim of the IVUS CHIP trial is to assess the superiority of an IVUS-guided approach vs an angio-guided approach in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures in terms of the study primary endpoint of target vessel failure.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>The IVUS CHIP trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov and assigned the identifier NCT04854070.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145905456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334
Alan Cohen MD , Anita Cohen
{"title":"Another perspective on democracy, healthcare and the public good","authors":"Alan Cohen MD , Anita Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145877472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337
Francisco B. Alexandrino MD , Reid Schlesinger MD , Jared Bird MD , Eunjung Lee PhD , Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS , Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH , Jae K. Oh , Peter A. Noseworthy MD , Patricia A. Pellikka MD , Zachi Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD , Paul A. Friedman , Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD , Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD , Gal Tsaban MD, PhD
Background
Early structural heart disease (SHD) detection is crucial for improving prognostic outcomes, but widely accessible screening methods are lacking. The advent of artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) and point-of-care cardiac-ultrasonography (POCCUS) offers promising new approaches for patient screening. We explored the feasibility and potential of integrating these innovative technologies into a practical SHD screening framework.
Methods
Outpatients undergoing ECG at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between November 2023 and February 2024 were pragmatically offered POCCUS, performed by novice operators and reviewed by expert echocardiographers. AI-ECG and POCCUS findings were integrated to assess SHD, including reduced left ventricular systolic function (ejection-fraction<50%), aortic stenosis, and increased left ventricular wall thickness suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Operators were blinded to patients’ comorbidities and formal echocardiogram results.
Results
Of 486 patients (median-age 64 years; 49% women), 286 had available formal echocardiography, with 17.5% having SHD. AI-ECG had a 32% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 94% negative predictive value (NPV) to detect any SHD. Adding POCCUS increased the overall PPV to 64% with an NPV of 93%, with an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 67% to 88%. Notably, 89.5% (17/19) of the “false positives” by AI-ECG + POCCUS had less-than-moderate-SHD. Applying the AI-ECG + POCCUS screening workflow on the entire cohort resulted in a number-needed-to-screen of 8 to identify 1 patient requiring formal echocardiography.
Conclusions
The integration of AI-ECG and POCCUS holds promise as a potentially effective screening method for SHD, facilitating improved patient selection for formal echocardiography.
{"title":"Integrating AI-ECG and point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for screening structural heart disease: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Francisco B. Alexandrino MD , Reid Schlesinger MD , Jared Bird MD , Eunjung Lee PhD , Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS , Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH , Jae K. Oh , Peter A. Noseworthy MD , Patricia A. Pellikka MD , Zachi Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD , Paul A. Friedman , Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD , Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD , Gal Tsaban MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early structural heart disease (SHD) detection is crucial for improving prognostic outcomes, but widely accessible screening methods are lacking. The advent of artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) and point-of-care cardiac-ultrasonography (POCCUS) offers promising new approaches for patient screening. We explored the feasibility and potential of integrating these innovative technologies into a practical SHD screening framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outpatients undergoing ECG at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between November 2023 and February 2024 were pragmatically offered POCCUS, performed by novice operators and reviewed by expert echocardiographers. AI-ECG and POCCUS findings were integrated to assess SHD, including reduced left ventricular systolic function (ejection-fraction<50%), aortic stenosis, and increased left ventricular wall thickness suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Operators were blinded to patients’ comorbidities and formal echocardiogram results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 486 patients (median-age 64 years; 49% women), 286 had available formal echocardiography, with 17.5% having SHD. AI-ECG had a 32% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 94% negative predictive value (NPV) to detect any SHD. Adding POCCUS increased the overall PPV to 64% with an NPV of 93%, with an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 67% to 88%. Notably, 89.5% (17/19) of the “false positives” by AI-ECG + POCCUS had less-than-moderate-SHD. Applying the AI-ECG + POCCUS screening workflow on the entire cohort resulted in a number-needed-to-screen of 8 to identify 1 patient requiring formal echocardiography.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The integration of AI-ECG and POCCUS holds promise as a potentially effective screening method for SHD, facilitating improved patient selection for formal echocardiography.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431
Alexander C Egbe, Zeyad Kholeif, Malini Madhavan, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone
Background: Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (cc-TGA). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in adults with cc-TGA.
Method: Retrospective cohort study of adults with cc-TGA who underwent ICD implantation at Mayo Clinic (2003-2024). Indications for ICD implantation were classified as primary versus secondary prevention. Study outcomes were appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks. Exploratory outcomes were device-related complications and mortality.
Results: Of 278 patients, 87 (31%) underwent ICD implantation (age 45±15 years, 59% males; primary prevention [N=67, 77%], secondary prevention [N=20, 23%]). Overall, 14 (16%) patients received appropriate ICD shock. The annual incidence of appropriate ICD shock was 3.7% per year and was lower in the primary versus secondary prevention groups (1.9% versus 8.2% per year, p=0.006). Overall, 11 (13%) patients received inappropriate ICD shock, yielding annual incidence of 3.5% per year. This was similar between the 2 groups. Apart from ICD implantation for secondary prevention, none of the conventional risk factors were associated with an appropriate ICD shock. All-cause mortality was high (31%) among the cohort, but none of the patients experienced SCD.
Conclusions: We observed a high rate of appropriate ICD shock, especially in the secondary prevention group. However, risk stratification of ICD implantation for primary prevention remains challenging. The absence of SCD (despite a high prevalence of all-cause mortality) suggest that ICD implantation may provide a survival benefit.
{"title":"Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Adults with Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries.","authors":"Alexander C Egbe, Zeyad Kholeif, Malini Madhavan, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (cc-TGA). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in adults with cc-TGA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of adults with cc-TGA who underwent ICD implantation at Mayo Clinic (2003-2024). Indications for ICD implantation were classified as primary versus secondary prevention. Study outcomes were appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks. Exploratory outcomes were device-related complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 278 patients, 87 (31%) underwent ICD implantation (age 45±15 years, 59% males; primary prevention [N=67, 77%], secondary prevention [N=20, 23%]). Overall, 14 (16%) patients received appropriate ICD shock. The annual incidence of appropriate ICD shock was 3.7% per year and was lower in the primary versus secondary prevention groups (1.9% versus 8.2% per year, p=0.006). Overall, 11 (13%) patients received inappropriate ICD shock, yielding annual incidence of 3.5% per year. This was similar between the 2 groups. Apart from ICD implantation for secondary prevention, none of the conventional risk factors were associated with an appropriate ICD shock. All-cause mortality was high (31%) among the cohort, but none of the patients experienced SCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a high rate of appropriate ICD shock, especially in the secondary prevention group. However, risk stratification of ICD implantation for primary prevention remains challenging. The absence of SCD (despite a high prevalence of all-cause mortality) suggest that ICD implantation may provide a survival benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430
Carlos Iribarren, Meng Lu, Alan S Go, Jamal S Rana, Karry Ngai, Adam M Rogers
Background: Despite evidence supporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction below 70 mg/dL after a major acute coronary event (MACE), many patients fail to reach this target.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study (baseline 2012-2022) with follow-up through 12/31/2024 (median follow-up: 5.1 years). Participants were 47,416 adults with non-fatal myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization discharged on lipid-lowering therapy. Main exposures were LDL-C levels within 1-year post-event and annually for 10 years. Outcomes were incident ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, revascularization, ischemic stroke, CHD death) and composite CVD events (ASCVD, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, CVD death).
Results: The cohort's mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years; 72% were male, and 58% white. In year 1, 12% lacked LDL-C testing; this rose from 44% in year 2 to 64% in year 10. Target LDL-C attainment was 67% in year 1 and 57-60% in years 2-10. Women and African American patients had lower target attainment. There was a clear upward trend of improved target control over time (58% in 2012, 77% in 2022). Comorbidities, cardiac rehabilitation participation, and adherence to lipid lowering therapy were associated with improved LDL-C control. Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL was associated with lower risk of ASCVD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) and composite CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.87); both p<0.001. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one ASCVD or composite CVD event were 19.7 and 26.3, respectively.
Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in LDL-C monitoring and treatment goal attainment post-MACE. Notable disparities by sex and race/ethnicity were observed. Failure to meet LDL-C targets was associated with a significant increase in ASCVD and CVD risk.
{"title":"Attaining LDL-cholesterol target post major coronary event: Care gap, associated factors and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Carlos Iribarren, Meng Lu, Alan S Go, Jamal S Rana, Karry Ngai, Adam M Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction below 70 mg/dL after a major acute coronary event (MACE), many patients fail to reach this target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study (baseline 2012-2022) with follow-up through 12/31/2024 (median follow-up: 5.1 years). Participants were 47,416 adults with non-fatal myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization discharged on lipid-lowering therapy. Main exposures were LDL-C levels within 1-year post-event and annually for 10 years. Outcomes were incident ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, revascularization, ischemic stroke, CHD death) and composite CVD events (ASCVD, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, CVD death).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort's mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years; 72% were male, and 58% white. In year 1, 12% lacked LDL-C testing; this rose from 44% in year 2 to 64% in year 10. Target LDL-C attainment was 67% in year 1 and 57-60% in years 2-10. Women and African American patients had lower target attainment. There was a clear upward trend of improved target control over time (58% in 2012, 77% in 2022). Comorbidities, cardiac rehabilitation participation, and adherence to lipid lowering therapy were associated with improved LDL-C control. Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL was associated with lower risk of ASCVD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) and composite CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.87); both p<0.001. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one ASCVD or composite CVD event were 19.7 and 26.3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant gaps exist in LDL-C monitoring and treatment goal attainment post-MACE. Notable disparities by sex and race/ethnicity were observed. Failure to meet LDL-C targets was associated with a significant increase in ASCVD and CVD risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429
Andreas Tzoumas, Danielle N Tapp, Namrita Ashokprabu, Christian W Schmidt, Sukhleen Kaur, Jane Carnesi, Claire Hanycz, Evan Lahkia, Jacob T Davis, Kamryn Wilson, Audrey Baker, Anibelky Almanzar, Jenny Zhang, Elnaz Mahbub, Somesh Rai, Ayushi Mohan, Odayme Quesada, Timothy D Henry
Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and is predominantly performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We analyzed a prospective registry of 231 patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent consecutive ICFT using the Doppler method in both the proximal LAD and the left circumflex (LCx) arteries for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment that included the LCx in addition to the LAD identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD (CFR<2.5) that would have been missed by LAD assessment only.
{"title":"Enhancing Invasive Coronary Function Testing: Multivessel Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (ANOCA).","authors":"Andreas Tzoumas, Danielle N Tapp, Namrita Ashokprabu, Christian W Schmidt, Sukhleen Kaur, Jane Carnesi, Claire Hanycz, Evan Lahkia, Jacob T Davis, Kamryn Wilson, Audrey Baker, Anibelky Almanzar, Jenny Zhang, Elnaz Mahbub, Somesh Rai, Ayushi Mohan, Odayme Quesada, Timothy D Henry","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and is predominantly performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We analyzed a prospective registry of 231 patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent consecutive ICFT using the Doppler method in both the proximal LAD and the left circumflex (LCx) arteries for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment that included the LCx in addition to the LAD identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD (CFR<2.5) that would have been missed by LAD assessment only.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107429"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427
Enrico Poletti, Sudhir Thotakura, Kathleen E Kearney, William L Lombardi, David E Hamilton, Hitinder S Gurm, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Lorenzo Azzalini
Background: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is a high-risk procedure where reliable risk prediction is essential. We compared the performance of two risk models (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2] and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS-CTO]) for the prediction of in-hospital outcomes after CTO-PCI.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed 1,157 CTO-PCI procedures performed at a single tertiary center between 2019 and 2023. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) method and calibration with calibration plots. Model accuracy was further quantified by the Brier score.
Results: Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred in 3.0% (n=35), and mortality in 1.0% (n=11). The BMC2 score outperformed PROGRESS-CTO for mortality prediction (AUC 0.96 vs 0.71; p<0.001). BMC2 achieved excellent prediction for acute kidney injury (AUC 0.93), dialysis (0.91), and stroke (0.84), while PROGRESS-CTO provided moderate accuracy for periprocedural myocardial infarction, pericardiocentesis (both AUC 0.71), coronary perforation (AUC 0.72) and MACCE (AUC 0.62). Calibration plots indicated better calibration for the PROGRESS-CTO model, while both models showed low overall prediction error (Brier score).
Conclusions: In CTO-PCI, BMC2 offers superior performance for in-hospital mortality prediction. Their complementary features suggest BMC2 as a powerful, data-demanding, and patient-focused tool, while PROGRESS-CTO as an easy-to-calculate, procedure-oriented model.
背景:慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CTO-PCI)是一种高风险手术,可靠的风险预测是必不可少的。我们比较了两种风险模型(密歇根心血管联盟的蓝十字蓝盾[BMC2]和慢性完全闭塞干预研究的前瞻性全球注册[PROGRESS-CTO])在预测CTO-PCI术后住院结果方面的表现。方法:我们回顾性分析了2019年至2023年在单个三级中心进行的1157例CTO-PCI手术。主要终点为住院死亡率。采用曲线下面积法(AUC)和标定图进行判别。模型的准确性通过Brier评分进一步量化。结果:主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)发生率为3.0% (n=35),死亡率为1.0% (n=11)。BMC2评分在预测死亡率方面优于PROGRESS-CTO评分(AUC 0.96 vs 0.71)。结论:在CTO-PCI中,BMC2评分在预测院内死亡率方面优于PROGRESS-CTO评分。它们的互补特性表明BMC2是一种功能强大、数据要求高、以患者为中心的工具,而PROGRESS-CTO是一种易于计算、面向过程的模型。
{"title":"Comparative Validation of Risk Scores for In-Hospital Complications Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Enrico Poletti, Sudhir Thotakura, Kathleen E Kearney, William L Lombardi, David E Hamilton, Hitinder S Gurm, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Lorenzo Azzalini","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is a high-risk procedure where reliable risk prediction is essential. We compared the performance of two risk models (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2] and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS-CTO]) for the prediction of in-hospital outcomes after CTO-PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 1,157 CTO-PCI procedures performed at a single tertiary center between 2019 and 2023. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) method and calibration with calibration plots. Model accuracy was further quantified by the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred in 3.0% (n=35), and mortality in 1.0% (n=11). The BMC2 score outperformed PROGRESS-CTO for mortality prediction (AUC 0.96 vs 0.71; p<0.001). BMC2 achieved excellent prediction for acute kidney injury (AUC 0.93), dialysis (0.91), and stroke (0.84), while PROGRESS-CTO provided moderate accuracy for periprocedural myocardial infarction, pericardiocentesis (both AUC 0.71), coronary perforation (AUC 0.72) and MACCE (AUC 0.62). Calibration plots indicated better calibration for the PROGRESS-CTO model, while both models showed low overall prediction error (Brier score).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CTO-PCI, BMC2 offers superior performance for in-hospital mortality prediction. Their complementary features suggest BMC2 as a powerful, data-demanding, and patient-focused tool, while PROGRESS-CTO as an easy-to-calculate, procedure-oriented model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147493564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424
Jonas Pausch, Oliver Bhadra, Jessica Weimann, Xiaoqin Hua, Yousuf Alassar, Evaldas Girdauskas, Andreas Schäfer, Simon Pecha, Hermann Reichenspurner, Lenard Conradi
Background: Endoscopic mitral valve surgery (MVS) has evolved at specialized centers aiming to reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery. The aim of this study was to monitor the evolution and temporal changes of endoscopic MVS at our institution.
Methods: Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 1.037 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic MVS and were categorized into an initial- (2012-2017; n=487) and a late-group (2018-2022; n=550). Data was retrospectively analyzed.
Results: Patient age increased during the study period from 56.0(47.0-64.2) to 61.0(55.0-68.0)years (p trend=0.0275). The prevalence of coronary artery disease (9.3vs.17.1%;p<0.001) and endocarditis (2.1vs.6.0%;p=0.0026) differed between groups. Median STS PROM score increased from 0.3(0.3-0.5) to 0.4(0.3-0.9) (p trend<0.001). MV repair was performed in 92.7%. Concomitant procedures, e.g., closure of left atrial appendage (21.0%), atrial ablation (19.2%) or tricuspid valve repair (6.7%) increased significantly over time (p trend<0.01). Nevertheless, median bypass and cross-clamp times decreased (p trend<0.001). Median postoperative ventilation time was 5.0(3.3-7.0)hours and decreased during the study-period (p trend<0.001). Length of intensive care unit and in-hospital stay were 2.0(1.0-3.0) and 7.0(6.0-9.0)days, respectively. At 30 days, overall mortality was 0.6% excluding patients with endocarditis. After 5 years re-operation rate was 2.5% and overall survival was 94.0%. During a maximum follow up of 11.2 years, reoperation rate was 5.0%, whereas overall survival was 88.5%.
Conclusions: In the present analysis, evolution of endoscopic MVS from isolated procedures in young, low-risk patients with simple MV pathology to combined procedures in older patients with complex MV disease, was demonstrated. Despite increasing surgical risk, complexity of MV disease as well as an increasing rate of concomitant procedures, perioperative outcome remained favorable over time, resulting in promising mid- to long-term results.
{"title":"Evolution of endoscopic mitral valve surgery over a 11-year period at a high-volume center.","authors":"Jonas Pausch, Oliver Bhadra, Jessica Weimann, Xiaoqin Hua, Yousuf Alassar, Evaldas Girdauskas, Andreas Schäfer, Simon Pecha, Hermann Reichenspurner, Lenard Conradi","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic mitral valve surgery (MVS) has evolved at specialized centers aiming to reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery. The aim of this study was to monitor the evolution and temporal changes of endoscopic MVS at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 1.037 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic MVS and were categorized into an initial- (2012-2017; n=487) and a late-group (2018-2022; n=550). Data was retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient age increased during the study period from 56.0(47.0-64.2) to 61.0(55.0-68.0)years (p trend=0.0275). The prevalence of coronary artery disease (9.3vs.17.1%;p<0.001) and endocarditis (2.1vs.6.0%;p=0.0026) differed between groups. Median STS PROM score increased from 0.3(0.3-0.5) to 0.4(0.3-0.9) (p trend<0.001). MV repair was performed in 92.7%. Concomitant procedures, e.g., closure of left atrial appendage (21.0%), atrial ablation (19.2%) or tricuspid valve repair (6.7%) increased significantly over time (p trend<0.01). Nevertheless, median bypass and cross-clamp times decreased (p trend<0.001). Median postoperative ventilation time was 5.0(3.3-7.0)hours and decreased during the study-period (p trend<0.001). Length of intensive care unit and in-hospital stay were 2.0(1.0-3.0) and 7.0(6.0-9.0)days, respectively. At 30 days, overall mortality was 0.6% excluding patients with endocarditis. After 5 years re-operation rate was 2.5% and overall survival was 94.0%. During a maximum follow up of 11.2 years, reoperation rate was 5.0%, whereas overall survival was 88.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present analysis, evolution of endoscopic MVS from isolated procedures in young, low-risk patients with simple MV pathology to combined procedures in older patients with complex MV disease, was demonstrated. Despite increasing surgical risk, complexity of MV disease as well as an increasing rate of concomitant procedures, perioperative outcome remained favorable over time, resulting in promising mid- to long-term results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147484434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}