首页 > 最新文献

American heart journal最新文献

英文 中文
Coevolutionary analysis of evidence and recommendations in STEMI clinical practice guidelines: A 33-year meta-research study of ACC, AHA, and ESC STEMI临床实践指南中证据和建议的共同进化分析:一项针对ACC、AHA和ESC的33年荟萃研究
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento MD, MSc , Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD , Marcos Venicius Malveira De Lima , Matheus de Freitas Itaborahy , Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, PhD , Brijesh Sathian MD, PhD , Holger Thiele MD, PhD , Bruno Ramos Nascimento
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is considered the main cause of mortality and morbidity for decades globally. Regularly, cardiology-related medical organizations publish clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to support healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of future cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the level of evidence (LOE) and classification of recommendations (CORs) endorsing STEMI-associated CPGs recommendations have not been systematically appraised.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This meta-research study evaluated and described the CORs and LOE over time for STEMI guidelines endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC), from 1990 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>We initially searched on PubMed and AHA/ACC/ESC electronic repositories to obtain STEMI-related CPGs, published from 1990 to 2023, including their immediate predecessors.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Guidelines related to acute in-hospital STEMI management were included; recommendations related to unstable angina/Non–STEMI were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Data management was performed by 2 content experts. Recommendations on pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions (PI and NPI, respectively) were extracted ipsilaterally, further processed and coded based on thematic analysis fundamentals. Recommendation's recordings associated with each recommendation were maintained as the primary guideline publication without team's specialist judgement. Pharmacological-related recommendations were categorized in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Changes in the proportion and LOE were evaluated longitudinally, using chi-square test (x<sup>2</sup>). Data visualization included heatmaps, linear plots, and Sankey diagrams.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Twenty-six guidelines (2,139 STEMI-specific recommendations) were evaluated. We observed an overall predominance of recommendations relying on moderate (proportion of 30.1% of LOE-B recommendations) or low (proportion of 28.9% of LOE-C recommendations) quality of evidence over the 33-year span. Only 17.7% of processed recommendations were based on high quality of evidence. Pharmacological interventions were more often LOE-A compared with NPI (21.5% vs 13.8%; <em>P</em>-value < 0.05). Most abstracted PI related to anticoagulants and dual anti-platelet therapies, while the most frequent category of NPI were related to percutaneous coronary interventions and implantable cardiac devices. Two consecutive guidelines comparison revealed that LOE and COR assigned to corresponding recommendation were minimal.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Restriction to only AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines and prim
背景:st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)被认为是几十年来全球死亡率和发病率的主要原因。心脏病学相关的医疗组织定期发布临床实践指南(cpg),以支持医疗保健专业人员诊断、管理和预防未来的心血管事件。然而,支持stemi相关CPGs建议的证据水平(LOE)和建议分类(CORs)尚未得到系统评价。目的:本荟萃研究评估并描述了美国心脏协会(AHA)、美国心脏病学会(ACC)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)认可的STEMI指南在1990-2023年间的CORs和LOE随时间的变化。数据来源:我们首先检索PubMed®和AHA/ACC/ESC电子知识库,获取1990-2023年间发表的stemi相关cpg,包括其直接前身。研究选择:纳入与急性院内STEMI管理相关的指南;不稳定型心绞痛/非stemi相关的推荐被排除。数据提取:由两名内容专家进行数据管理。对药物和非药物干预措施的建议(分别为PI和NPI)进行同侧提取,并根据主题分析基础进行进一步处理和编码。与每项建议相关的录音被保留为主要的指南出版物,没有团队的专家判断。世卫组织药物统计方法学合作中心根据解剖治疗化学分类系统对与药物有关的建议进行了分类。采用卡方检验(x2)纵向评价比例和LOE的变化。数据可视化包括热图、线性图和桑基图。数据综合:评估了26项指南(2139项stemi特定建议)。我们观察到,在33年的时间跨度中,中度(占LOE-B推荐的30.1%)或低质量(占LOE-C推荐的28.9%)证据质量的推荐总体上占主导地位。经过处理的建议中只有17.7%是基于高质量的证据。与NPI相比,药物干预更多的是LOE-A(21.5%比13.8%;p值< 0.05)。大多数抽象的PI与抗凝剂和双重抗血小板治疗有关,而最常见的NPI类别与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和植入式心脏装置有关。两个连续的指南比较显示LOE和COR分配到相应的建议是最小的。局限性:仅限于AHA/ACC/ESC指南,主要关注急性院内管理建议。结论:全球最重要的心脏病学会提出的stemi相关建议在很大程度上依赖于中等/低质量的证据,随着时间的推移会有轻微的变化。以更务实和有效的方式产生高质量证据的新方法是必要的。协议注册:OSF.IO/BRD58下的开放科学框架。
{"title":"Coevolutionary analysis of evidence and recommendations in STEMI clinical practice guidelines: A 33-year meta-research study of ACC, AHA, and ESC","authors":"Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcos Venicius Malveira De Lima ,&nbsp;Matheus de Freitas Itaborahy ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brijesh Sathian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Holger Thiele MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bruno Ramos Nascimento","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107326","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is considered the main cause of mortality and morbidity for decades globally. Regularly, cardiology-related medical organizations publish clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to support healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of future cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the level of evidence (LOE) and classification of recommendations (CORs) endorsing STEMI-associated CPGs recommendations have not been systematically appraised.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This meta-research study evaluated and described the CORs and LOE over time for STEMI guidelines endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC), from 1990 to 2023.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data sources&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We initially searched on PubMed and AHA/ACC/ESC electronic repositories to obtain STEMI-related CPGs, published from 1990 to 2023, including their immediate predecessors.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Selection&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Guidelines related to acute in-hospital STEMI management were included; recommendations related to unstable angina/Non–STEMI were excluded.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Extraction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Data management was performed by 2 content experts. Recommendations on pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions (PI and NPI, respectively) were extracted ipsilaterally, further processed and coded based on thematic analysis fundamentals. Recommendation's recordings associated with each recommendation were maintained as the primary guideline publication without team's specialist judgement. Pharmacological-related recommendations were categorized in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Changes in the proportion and LOE were evaluated longitudinally, using chi-square test (x&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;). Data visualization included heatmaps, linear plots, and Sankey diagrams.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Synthesis&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Twenty-six guidelines (2,139 STEMI-specific recommendations) were evaluated. We observed an overall predominance of recommendations relying on moderate (proportion of 30.1% of LOE-B recommendations) or low (proportion of 28.9% of LOE-C recommendations) quality of evidence over the 33-year span. Only 17.7% of processed recommendations were based on high quality of evidence. Pharmacological interventions were more often LOE-A compared with NPI (21.5% vs 13.8%; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;-value &lt; 0.05). Most abstracted PI related to anticoagulants and dual anti-platelet therapies, while the most frequent category of NPI were related to percutaneous coronary interventions and implantable cardiac devices. Two consecutive guidelines comparison revealed that LOE and COR assigned to corresponding recommendation were minimal.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Restriction to only AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines and prim","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design and rationale of the WARRIOR ancillary study for coronary CT angiographic analysis 冠状动脉CT血管造影分析的WARRIOR辅助研究的设计和原理。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340
Balaji Tamarappoo MD, PhD , Rafal Wolny MD, PhD , Guadalupe Flores Tomasino MD , Daniel Berman MD , Eileen Handberg PhD , Carl J. Pepine MD , Margaret C. Lo MD , Matthew Budoff MD , Leslee Shaw PhD , Chrisandra Shufelt MD , Janet Wei MD , Martha Gulati MD, MS , C. Noel Bairey Merz MD , Damini Dey PhD

Background

Over 50% of women evaluated for suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in intermediate outcome trials; however, impact on coronary plaque has not been well characterized.

Objectives

The Women’s IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR NCT03417388) trial testing intensive medical therapy (IMT) (high intensity statin, ACEI or ARB and low dose aspirin) vs usual care (UC) in women with suspected INOCA offers the opportunity to evaluate the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and chest pain symptoms by coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We hypothesize that IMT provides beneficial data on plaque composition impacting flow reserve and trial outcomes.

Methods

This WARRIOR ancillary study will consecutively enroll 200 eligible participants randomized to IMT vs UC by baseline and exit CCTA. Changes in plaque and peri‑coronary artery adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT) characteristics will be quantified.

Results

Results will address: (1) Changes in coronary plaque characteristics and their hemodynamic significance using AI-enabled quantification of CCTA; (2) Changes in plaque inflammatory characteristics through pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density analysis; (3) Plaque burden, composition and PCAT density changes related to angina score (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]), (4) Derive a quantitative machine learning risk score (MLRS) using CCTA-derived variables for prediction of change in angina.

Conclusions

The ancillary study will be the first to quantify the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and outcomes in women with suspected INOCA.

Trial Registration

WARRIOR Ancillary Study for CCTA Analysis, NCT05035056
背景:超过50%被评估为疑似缺血的女性没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(INOCA)。他汀类药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在中间结局试验中是有效的;然而,对冠状动脉斑块的影响尚未很好地表征。目的:减少非阻塞性CAD事件的女性缺血试验(WARRIOR NCT03417388)试验测试了疑似inova女性强化药物治疗(IMT)(高强度他汀类药物、ACEI或ARB和低剂量阿司匹林)与常规治疗(UC)的对比,通过冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)评估IMT与UC对斑块组成和胸痛症状的影响。我们假设IMT提供了影响血流储备和试验结果的斑块组成的有益数据。方法:这项WARRIOR辅助研究将连续招募200名符合条件的参与者,根据基线和退出CCTA随机分为IMT和UC。斑块和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织衰减(PCAT)特征的变化将被量化。结果:结果将解决:(1)使用人工智能支持的CCTA量化冠状动脉斑块特征的变化及其血流动力学意义;(2)通过冠状动脉周围脂肪组织(PCAT)密度分析斑块炎症特征的变化;(3)斑块负担、组成和PCAT密度变化与心绞痛评分相关(Seattle angina Questionnaire [SAQ]);(4)利用ccta衍生的变量得出定量机器学习风险评分(MLRS),用于预测心绞痛的变化。结论:这项辅助研究将首次量化IMT与UC对怀疑患有INOCA的女性斑块组成和结局的影响。试验注册:WARRIOR辅助研究CCTA分析,NCT05035056。
{"title":"Design and rationale of the WARRIOR ancillary study for coronary CT angiographic analysis","authors":"Balaji Tamarappoo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rafal Wolny MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Flores Tomasino MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Berman MD ,&nbsp;Eileen Handberg PhD ,&nbsp;Carl J. Pepine MD ,&nbsp;Margaret C. Lo MD ,&nbsp;Matthew Budoff MD ,&nbsp;Leslee Shaw PhD ,&nbsp;Chrisandra Shufelt MD ,&nbsp;Janet Wei MD ,&nbsp;Martha Gulati MD, MS ,&nbsp;C. Noel Bairey Merz MD ,&nbsp;Damini Dey PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107340","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Over 50% of women evaluated for suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in intermediate outcome trials; however, impact on coronary plaque has not been well characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Women’s IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR NCT03417388) trial testing intensive medical therapy (IMT) (high intensity statin, ACEI or ARB and low dose aspirin) vs usual care (UC) in women with suspected INOCA offers the opportunity to evaluate the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and chest pain symptoms by coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We hypothesize that IMT provides beneficial data on plaque composition impacting flow reserve and trial outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This WARRIOR ancillary study will consecutively enroll 200 eligible participants randomized to IMT vs UC by baseline and exit CCTA. Changes in plaque and peri‑coronary artery adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT) characteristics will be quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results will address: (1) Changes in coronary plaque characteristics and their hemodynamic significance using AI-enabled quantification of CCTA; (2) Changes in plaque inflammatory characteristics through pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density analysis; (3) Plaque burden, composition and PCAT density changes related to angina score (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]), (4) Derive a quantitative machine learning risk score (MLRS) using CCTA-derived variables for prediction of change in angina.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The ancillary study will be the first to quantify the impact of IMT vs UC on plaque composition, and outcomes in women with suspected INOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>WARRIOR Ancillary Study for CCTA Analysis, NCT05035056</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for complex high-risk indicated procedures: The IVUS CHIP trial study design 复杂高危手术的血管内超声指导:IVUS CHIP试验研究设计。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339
Roberto Diletti MD, PhD , Joost Daemen MD, PhD , Benjamin Faurie MD , Marco Barbierato MD , Didier Tchetche MD , Thomas Hovasse MD , Koen Teeuwen MD, PhD , Rohit M. Oemrawsingh MD, PhD , Abdelhakim Allali MD, PhD , Gianluca Campo MD, PhD , Johan Bennett MD, PhD , Fernando Alfonso MD , Kambis Mashayekhi MD, PhD , Raul Moreno MD, PhD , Youssef S. Abdelwahed MD, PhD , Admir Dedic MD, PhD , Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez MD, PhD , John C. Murphy MB, BCH, MD, MRCP , Ignacio Amat-Santos MD, PhD , Joseph Dens MD, PhD , Nicolas M. Van Mieghem MD, PhD

Background

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in clinical events. Whereas most evidence is generated in Asian-Pacific populations, its global adoption remains low.

Methods

The IVUS complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP) trial is a multicenter, international, event-driven, randomized superiority trial comparing IVUS-guided PCI with angio-guided PCI during complex high-risk indicated procedures. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. The IVUS CHIP trial utilizes an event-driven approach. The outcomes for the primary endpoint are first reported when at least 169 patients with a primary endpoint have been confirmed. A total of 2020 patients will be enrolled in 37 European sites.

Conclusions

The aim of the IVUS CHIP trial is to assess the superiority of an IVUS-guided approach vs an angio-guided approach in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures in terms of the study primary endpoint of target vessel failure.

Trial Registration

The IVUS CHIP trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov and assigned the identifier NCT04854070.
背景:血管内超声(IVUS)指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与临床事件的减少有关。虽然大多数证据是在亚太地区产生的,但其全球采用率仍然很低。方法:IVUS CHIP试验是一项多中心、国际性、事件驱动的随机优势试验,比较IVUS引导下的PCI与血管引导下的PCI在复杂的高风险指示手术中的差异。主要终点是靶血管衰竭,定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或临床指示的靶血管重建术。IVUS CHIP试验采用事件驱动的方法。当至少169例患者确认有主要终点时,首次报告主要终点的结果。总共有2020名患者将在37个欧洲站点入组。IVUS CHIP试验在ClinicalTrial.gov注册,并分配标识符NCT04854070。结论:IVUS CHIP试验的目的是就研究主要终点靶血管衰竭而言,评估IVUS引导入路与血管引导入路在接受复杂高风险指征手术的患者中的优越性。
{"title":"Intravascular ultrasound guidance for complex high-risk indicated procedures: The IVUS CHIP trial study design","authors":"Roberto Diletti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joost Daemen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Faurie MD ,&nbsp;Marco Barbierato MD ,&nbsp;Didier Tchetche MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Hovasse MD ,&nbsp;Koen Teeuwen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rohit M. Oemrawsingh MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Abdelhakim Allali MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Campo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Johan Bennett MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fernando Alfonso MD ,&nbsp;Kambis Mashayekhi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Raul Moreno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Youssef S. Abdelwahed MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Admir Dedic MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John C. Murphy MB, BCH, MD, MRCP ,&nbsp;Ignacio Amat-Santos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph Dens MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107339","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in clinical events. Whereas most evidence is generated in Asian-Pacific populations, its global adoption remains low.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The IVUS complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP) trial is a multicenter, international, event-driven, randomized superiority trial comparing IVUS-guided PCI with angio-guided PCI during complex high-risk indicated procedures. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. The IVUS CHIP trial utilizes an event-driven approach. The outcomes for the primary endpoint are first reported when at least 169 patients with a primary endpoint have been confirmed. A total of 2020 patients will be enrolled in 37 European sites.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The aim of the IVUS CHIP trial is to assess the superiority of an IVUS-guided approach vs an angio-guided approach in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures in terms of the study primary endpoint of target vessel failure.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>The IVUS CHIP trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov and assigned the identifier NCT04854070.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145905456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Another perspective on democracy, healthcare and the public good 这是对民主、医疗保健和公益事业的另一种看法。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334
Alan Cohen MD , Anita Cohen
{"title":"Another perspective on democracy, healthcare and the public good","authors":"Alan Cohen MD ,&nbsp;Anita Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107334","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145877472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating AI-ECG and point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for screening structural heart disease: A proof-of-concept study 整合AI-ECG和即时心脏超声筛查结构性心脏病:一项概念验证研究
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337
Francisco B. Alexandrino MD , Reid Schlesinger MD , Jared Bird MD , Eunjung Lee PhD , Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS , Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH , Jae K. Oh , Peter A. Noseworthy MD , Patricia A. Pellikka MD , Zachi Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD , Paul A. Friedman , Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD , Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD , Gal Tsaban MD, PhD

Background

Early structural heart disease (SHD) detection is crucial for improving prognostic outcomes, but widely accessible screening methods are lacking. The advent of artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) and point-of-care cardiac-ultrasonography (POCCUS) offers promising new approaches for patient screening. We explored the feasibility and potential of integrating these innovative technologies into a practical SHD screening framework.

Methods

Outpatients undergoing ECG at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between November 2023 and February 2024 were pragmatically offered POCCUS, performed by novice operators and reviewed by expert echocardiographers. AI-ECG and POCCUS findings were integrated to assess SHD, including reduced left ventricular systolic function (ejection-fraction<50%), aortic stenosis, and increased left ventricular wall thickness suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Operators were blinded to patients’ comorbidities and formal echocardiogram results.

Results

Of 486 patients (median-age 64 years; 49% women), 286 had available formal echocardiography, with 17.5% having SHD. AI-ECG had a 32% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 94% negative predictive value (NPV) to detect any SHD. Adding POCCUS increased the overall PPV to 64% with an NPV of 93%, with an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 67% to 88%. Notably, 89.5% (17/19) of the “false positives” by AI-ECG + POCCUS had less-than-moderate-SHD. Applying the AI-ECG + POCCUS screening workflow on the entire cohort resulted in a number-needed-to-screen of 8 to identify 1 patient requiring formal echocardiography.

Conclusions

The integration of AI-ECG and POCCUS holds promise as a potentially effective screening method for SHD, facilitating improved patient selection for formal echocardiography.
背景:早期结构性心脏病(SHD)检测对改善预后至关重要,但缺乏广泛可及的筛查方法。人工智能心电图(AI-ECG)和即时心脏超声检查(POCCUS)的出现为患者筛查提供了有希望的新方法。我们探索了将这些创新技术整合到实际的SHD筛选框架中的可行性和潜力。方法:2023年11月至2024年2月在梅奥诊所心电实验室接受心电图检查的门诊患者,采用实用的POCCUS,由新手操作并由超声心动图专家审核。综合AI-ECG和POCCUS结果来评估SHD,包括左心室收缩功能降低(射血分数)结果:在486例患者(中位年龄64岁;49%为女性)中,286例进行了正式的超声心动图检查,其中17.5%患有SHD。AI-ECG检测任何SHD的阳性预测值为32%,阴性预测值为94%。添加POCCUS将总PPV提高到64%,NPV提高到93%,诊断准确率从67%提高到88%。值得注意的是,89.5%(17/19)的AI-ECG+POCCUS“假阳性”为中度以下shd。在整个队列中应用AI-ECG+POCCUS筛查工作流程导致需要筛查的数字为8,以确定需要正式超声心动图的患者。结论:AI-ECG和POCCUS的结合有望成为一种潜在的有效的SHD筛查方法,有助于改善患者对正式超声心动图的选择。
{"title":"Integrating AI-ECG and point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for screening structural heart disease: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Francisco B. Alexandrino MD ,&nbsp;Reid Schlesinger MD ,&nbsp;Jared Bird MD ,&nbsp;Eunjung Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS ,&nbsp;Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Jae K. Oh ,&nbsp;Peter A. Noseworthy MD ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Pellikka MD ,&nbsp;Zachi Attia PhD ,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD ,&nbsp;Paul A. Friedman ,&nbsp;Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gal Tsaban MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107337","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early structural heart disease (SHD) detection is crucial for improving prognostic outcomes, but widely accessible screening methods are lacking. The advent of artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) and point-of-care cardiac-ultrasonography (POCCUS) offers promising new approaches for patient screening. We explored the feasibility and potential of integrating these innovative technologies into a practical SHD screening framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outpatients undergoing ECG at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between November 2023 and February 2024 were pragmatically offered POCCUS, performed by novice operators and reviewed by expert echocardiographers. AI-ECG and POCCUS findings were integrated to assess SHD, including reduced left ventricular systolic function (ejection-fraction&lt;50%), aortic stenosis, and increased left ventricular wall thickness suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Operators were blinded to patients’ comorbidities and formal echocardiogram results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 486 patients (median-age 64 years; 49% women), 286 had available formal echocardiography, with 17.5% having SHD. AI-ECG had a 32% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 94% negative predictive value (NPV) to detect any SHD. Adding POCCUS increased the overall PPV to 64% with an NPV of 93%, with an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 67% to 88%. Notably, 89.5% (17/19) of the “false positives” by AI-ECG + POCCUS had less-than-moderate-SHD. Applying the AI-ECG + POCCUS screening workflow on the entire cohort resulted in a number-needed-to-screen of 8 to identify 1 patient requiring formal echocardiography.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The integration of AI-ECG and POCCUS holds promise as a potentially effective screening method for SHD, facilitating improved patient selection for formal echocardiography.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 107337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Adults with Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries. 成人先天性纠正性大动脉转位的植入式心律转复除颤器植入的结果。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-03-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431
Alexander C Egbe, Zeyad Kholeif, Malini Madhavan, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone

Background: Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (cc-TGA). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in adults with cc-TGA.

Method: Retrospective cohort study of adults with cc-TGA who underwent ICD implantation at Mayo Clinic (2003-2024). Indications for ICD implantation were classified as primary versus secondary prevention. Study outcomes were appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks. Exploratory outcomes were device-related complications and mortality.

Results: Of 278 patients, 87 (31%) underwent ICD implantation (age 45±15 years, 59% males; primary prevention [N=67, 77%], secondary prevention [N=20, 23%]). Overall, 14 (16%) patients received appropriate ICD shock. The annual incidence of appropriate ICD shock was 3.7% per year and was lower in the primary versus secondary prevention groups (1.9% versus 8.2% per year, p=0.006). Overall, 11 (13%) patients received inappropriate ICD shock, yielding annual incidence of 3.5% per year. This was similar between the 2 groups. Apart from ICD implantation for secondary prevention, none of the conventional risk factors were associated with an appropriate ICD shock. All-cause mortality was high (31%) among the cohort, but none of the patients experienced SCD.

Conclusions: We observed a high rate of appropriate ICD shock, especially in the secondary prevention group. However, risk stratification of ICD implantation for primary prevention remains challenging. The absence of SCD (despite a high prevalence of all-cause mortality) suggest that ICD implantation may provide a survival benefit.

背景:室性心律失常和心源性猝死(SCD)在成人先天性大动脉转位(cc-TGA)中很常见。本研究的目的是描述成人cc-TGA患者植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入术后的结果。方法:回顾性队列研究2003-2024年在梅奥诊所接受ICD植入的成人cc-TGA患者。ICD植入的适应症分为一级预防和二级预防。研究结果是适当和不适当的ICD电击。探索性结果为器械相关并发症和死亡率。结果:278例患者中,87例(31%)行ICD植入术(年龄45±15岁,男性59%;一级预防[N=67, 77%],二级预防[N=20, 23%])。总体而言,14例(16%)患者接受了适当的ICD休克。适当ICD休克的年发生率为3.7% /年,一级预防组比二级预防组低(1.9% /年比8.2% /年,p=0.006)。总体而言,11例(13%)患者接受了不适当的ICD休克,年发病率为3.5%。这在两组之间是相似的。除了ICD植入用于二级预防外,没有任何常规危险因素与适当的ICD休克相关。该队列的全因死亡率很高(31%),但没有患者发生SCD。结论:我们观察到适当的ICD休克率很高,特别是在二级预防组。然而,ICD植入术的一级预防风险分层仍然具有挑战性。没有SCD(尽管全因死亡率很高)表明ICD植入可能提供生存益处。
{"title":"Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Adults with Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries.","authors":"Alexander C Egbe, Zeyad Kholeif, Malini Madhavan, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (cc-TGA). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in adults with cc-TGA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of adults with cc-TGA who underwent ICD implantation at Mayo Clinic (2003-2024). Indications for ICD implantation were classified as primary versus secondary prevention. Study outcomes were appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks. Exploratory outcomes were device-related complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 278 patients, 87 (31%) underwent ICD implantation (age 45±15 years, 59% males; primary prevention [N=67, 77%], secondary prevention [N=20, 23%]). Overall, 14 (16%) patients received appropriate ICD shock. The annual incidence of appropriate ICD shock was 3.7% per year and was lower in the primary versus secondary prevention groups (1.9% versus 8.2% per year, p=0.006). Overall, 11 (13%) patients received inappropriate ICD shock, yielding annual incidence of 3.5% per year. This was similar between the 2 groups. Apart from ICD implantation for secondary prevention, none of the conventional risk factors were associated with an appropriate ICD shock. All-cause mortality was high (31%) among the cohort, but none of the patients experienced SCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a high rate of appropriate ICD shock, especially in the secondary prevention group. However, risk stratification of ICD implantation for primary prevention remains challenging. The absence of SCD (despite a high prevalence of all-cause mortality) suggest that ICD implantation may provide a survival benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attaining LDL-cholesterol target post major coronary event: Care gap, associated factors and clinical outcomes. 在主要冠状动脉事件后达到ldl -胆固醇目标:护理差距、相关因素和临床结果
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-03-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430
Carlos Iribarren, Meng Lu, Alan S Go, Jamal S Rana, Karry Ngai, Adam M Rogers

Background: Despite evidence supporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction below 70 mg/dL after a major acute coronary event (MACE), many patients fail to reach this target.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study (baseline 2012-2022) with follow-up through 12/31/2024 (median follow-up: 5.1 years). Participants were 47,416 adults with non-fatal myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization discharged on lipid-lowering therapy. Main exposures were LDL-C levels within 1-year post-event and annually for 10 years. Outcomes were incident ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, revascularization, ischemic stroke, CHD death) and composite CVD events (ASCVD, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, CVD death).

Results: The cohort's mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years; 72% were male, and 58% white. In year 1, 12% lacked LDL-C testing; this rose from 44% in year 2 to 64% in year 10. Target LDL-C attainment was 67% in year 1 and 57-60% in years 2-10. Women and African American patients had lower target attainment. There was a clear upward trend of improved target control over time (58% in 2012, 77% in 2022). Comorbidities, cardiac rehabilitation participation, and adherence to lipid lowering therapy were associated with improved LDL-C control. Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL was associated with lower risk of ASCVD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) and composite CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.87); both p<0.001. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one ASCVD or composite CVD event were 19.7 and 26.3, respectively.

Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in LDL-C monitoring and treatment goal attainment post-MACE. Notable disparities by sex and race/ethnicity were observed. Failure to meet LDL-C targets was associated with a significant increase in ASCVD and CVD risk.

背景:尽管有证据支持在严重急性冠状动脉事件(MACE)后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)降至70 mg/dL以下,但许多患者未能达到这一目标。方法:回顾性队列研究(基线2012-2022),随访至2024年12月31日(中位随访:5.1年)。参与者是47,416名接受降脂治疗的非致死性心肌梗死和/或冠状动脉血运重建的成年人。主要暴露于事件发生后1年内和10年内的LDL-C水平。结果是ASCVD事件(心肌梗死、血运重建术、缺血性卒中、冠心病死亡)和复合CVD事件(ASCVD、心力衰竭、周围血管疾病、CVD死亡)。结果:该队列的平均(SD)年龄为66(12)岁;其中72%为男性,58%为白人。在第1年,12%的患者缺乏LDL-C检测;这一比例从第二年的44%上升到第10年的64%。目标LDL-C在第一年达到67%,在2-10年达到57-60%。女性和非裔美国患者的目标达成率较低。随着时间的推移,改善目标控制的趋势明显上升(2012年为58%,2022年为77%)。合并症、心脏康复参与和坚持降脂治疗与改善LDL-C控制相关。结论:mace后LDL-C监测和治疗目标实现存在显著差距。性别和种族/民族之间存在显著差异。未能达到LDL-C目标与ASCVD和CVD风险显著增加相关。
{"title":"Attaining LDL-cholesterol target post major coronary event: Care gap, associated factors and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Carlos Iribarren, Meng Lu, Alan S Go, Jamal S Rana, Karry Ngai, Adam M Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction below 70 mg/dL after a major acute coronary event (MACE), many patients fail to reach this target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study (baseline 2012-2022) with follow-up through 12/31/2024 (median follow-up: 5.1 years). Participants were 47,416 adults with non-fatal myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization discharged on lipid-lowering therapy. Main exposures were LDL-C levels within 1-year post-event and annually for 10 years. Outcomes were incident ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, revascularization, ischemic stroke, CHD death) and composite CVD events (ASCVD, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, CVD death).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort's mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years; 72% were male, and 58% white. In year 1, 12% lacked LDL-C testing; this rose from 44% in year 2 to 64% in year 10. Target LDL-C attainment was 67% in year 1 and 57-60% in years 2-10. Women and African American patients had lower target attainment. There was a clear upward trend of improved target control over time (58% in 2012, 77% in 2022). Comorbidities, cardiac rehabilitation participation, and adherence to lipid lowering therapy were associated with improved LDL-C control. Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL was associated with lower risk of ASCVD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) and composite CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.87); both p<0.001. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one ASCVD or composite CVD event were 19.7 and 26.3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant gaps exist in LDL-C monitoring and treatment goal attainment post-MACE. Notable disparities by sex and race/ethnicity were observed. Failure to meet LDL-C targets was associated with a significant increase in ASCVD and CVD risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Invasive Coronary Function Testing: Multivessel Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (ANOCA). 增强有创冠状动脉功能检测:多血管评估心绞痛和无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-03-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429
Andreas Tzoumas, Danielle N Tapp, Namrita Ashokprabu, Christian W Schmidt, Sukhleen Kaur, Jane Carnesi, Claire Hanycz, Evan Lahkia, Jacob T Davis, Kamryn Wilson, Audrey Baker, Anibelky Almanzar, Jenny Zhang, Elnaz Mahbub, Somesh Rai, Ayushi Mohan, Odayme Quesada, Timothy D Henry

Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and is predominantly performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We analyzed a prospective registry of 231 patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent consecutive ICFT using the Doppler method in both the proximal LAD and the left circumflex (LCx) arteries for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment that included the LCx in addition to the LAD identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD (CFR<2.5) that would have been missed by LAD assessment only.

有创冠状动脉功能测试(ICFT)是诊断冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)的金标准,主要在左冠状动脉前降支(LAD)中进行。我们分析了231例心绞痛且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)患者的前瞻性登记,这些患者使用多普勒方法在近端LAD和左旋(LCx)动脉连续进行ICFT,以评估冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)。ICFT结合多血管CFR评估,除LAD外,还包括LCx,额外确定了10%的CMD (CFR)患者
{"title":"Enhancing Invasive Coronary Function Testing: Multivessel Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (ANOCA).","authors":"Andreas Tzoumas, Danielle N Tapp, Namrita Ashokprabu, Christian W Schmidt, Sukhleen Kaur, Jane Carnesi, Claire Hanycz, Evan Lahkia, Jacob T Davis, Kamryn Wilson, Audrey Baker, Anibelky Almanzar, Jenny Zhang, Elnaz Mahbub, Somesh Rai, Ayushi Mohan, Odayme Quesada, Timothy D Henry","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and is predominantly performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We analyzed a prospective registry of 231 patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent consecutive ICFT using the Doppler method in both the proximal LAD and the left circumflex (LCx) arteries for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment that included the LCx in addition to the LAD identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD (CFR<2.5) that would have been missed by LAD assessment only.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107429"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Validation of Risk Scores for In-Hospital Complications Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. 慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后院内并发症风险评分的比较验证。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427
Enrico Poletti, Sudhir Thotakura, Kathleen E Kearney, William L Lombardi, David E Hamilton, Hitinder S Gurm, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Lorenzo Azzalini

Background: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is a high-risk procedure where reliable risk prediction is essential. We compared the performance of two risk models (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2] and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS-CTO]) for the prediction of in-hospital outcomes after CTO-PCI.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 1,157 CTO-PCI procedures performed at a single tertiary center between 2019 and 2023. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) method and calibration with calibration plots. Model accuracy was further quantified by the Brier score.

Results: Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred in 3.0% (n=35), and mortality in 1.0% (n=11). The BMC2 score outperformed PROGRESS-CTO for mortality prediction (AUC 0.96 vs 0.71; p<0.001). BMC2 achieved excellent prediction for acute kidney injury (AUC 0.93), dialysis (0.91), and stroke (0.84), while PROGRESS-CTO provided moderate accuracy for periprocedural myocardial infarction, pericardiocentesis (both AUC 0.71), coronary perforation (AUC 0.72) and MACCE (AUC 0.62). Calibration plots indicated better calibration for the PROGRESS-CTO model, while both models showed low overall prediction error (Brier score).

Conclusions: In CTO-PCI, BMC2 offers superior performance for in-hospital mortality prediction. Their complementary features suggest BMC2 as a powerful, data-demanding, and patient-focused tool, while PROGRESS-CTO as an easy-to-calculate, procedure-oriented model.

背景:慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CTO-PCI)是一种高风险手术,可靠的风险预测是必不可少的。我们比较了两种风险模型(密歇根心血管联盟的蓝十字蓝盾[BMC2]和慢性完全闭塞干预研究的前瞻性全球注册[PROGRESS-CTO])在预测CTO-PCI术后住院结果方面的表现。方法:我们回顾性分析了2019年至2023年在单个三级中心进行的1157例CTO-PCI手术。主要终点为住院死亡率。采用曲线下面积法(AUC)和标定图进行判别。模型的准确性通过Brier评分进一步量化。结果:主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)发生率为3.0% (n=35),死亡率为1.0% (n=11)。BMC2评分在预测死亡率方面优于PROGRESS-CTO评分(AUC 0.96 vs 0.71)。结论:在CTO-PCI中,BMC2评分在预测院内死亡率方面优于PROGRESS-CTO评分。它们的互补特性表明BMC2是一种功能强大、数据要求高、以患者为中心的工具,而PROGRESS-CTO是一种易于计算、面向过程的模型。
{"title":"Comparative Validation of Risk Scores for In-Hospital Complications Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Enrico Poletti, Sudhir Thotakura, Kathleen E Kearney, William L Lombardi, David E Hamilton, Hitinder S Gurm, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Lorenzo Azzalini","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is a high-risk procedure where reliable risk prediction is essential. We compared the performance of two risk models (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2] and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS-CTO]) for the prediction of in-hospital outcomes after CTO-PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 1,157 CTO-PCI procedures performed at a single tertiary center between 2019 and 2023. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) method and calibration with calibration plots. Model accuracy was further quantified by the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred in 3.0% (n=35), and mortality in 1.0% (n=11). The BMC2 score outperformed PROGRESS-CTO for mortality prediction (AUC 0.96 vs 0.71; p<0.001). BMC2 achieved excellent prediction for acute kidney injury (AUC 0.93), dialysis (0.91), and stroke (0.84), while PROGRESS-CTO provided moderate accuracy for periprocedural myocardial infarction, pericardiocentesis (both AUC 0.71), coronary perforation (AUC 0.72) and MACCE (AUC 0.62). Calibration plots indicated better calibration for the PROGRESS-CTO model, while both models showed low overall prediction error (Brier score).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CTO-PCI, BMC2 offers superior performance for in-hospital mortality prediction. Their complementary features suggest BMC2 as a powerful, data-demanding, and patient-focused tool, while PROGRESS-CTO as an easy-to-calculate, procedure-oriented model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147493564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolution of endoscopic mitral valve surgery over a 11-year period at a high-volume center. 内镜下二尖瓣手术在大容量中心11年间的发展。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424
Jonas Pausch, Oliver Bhadra, Jessica Weimann, Xiaoqin Hua, Yousuf Alassar, Evaldas Girdauskas, Andreas Schäfer, Simon Pecha, Hermann Reichenspurner, Lenard Conradi

Background: Endoscopic mitral valve surgery (MVS) has evolved at specialized centers aiming to reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery. The aim of this study was to monitor the evolution and temporal changes of endoscopic MVS at our institution.

Methods: Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 1.037 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic MVS and were categorized into an initial- (2012-2017; n=487) and a late-group (2018-2022; n=550). Data was retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Patient age increased during the study period from 56.0(47.0-64.2) to 61.0(55.0-68.0)years (p trend=0.0275). The prevalence of coronary artery disease (9.3vs.17.1%;p<0.001) and endocarditis (2.1vs.6.0%;p=0.0026) differed between groups. Median STS PROM score increased from 0.3(0.3-0.5) to 0.4(0.3-0.9) (p trend<0.001). MV repair was performed in 92.7%. Concomitant procedures, e.g., closure of left atrial appendage (21.0%), atrial ablation (19.2%) or tricuspid valve repair (6.7%) increased significantly over time (p trend<0.01). Nevertheless, median bypass and cross-clamp times decreased (p trend<0.001). Median postoperative ventilation time was 5.0(3.3-7.0)hours and decreased during the study-period (p trend<0.001). Length of intensive care unit and in-hospital stay were 2.0(1.0-3.0) and 7.0(6.0-9.0)days, respectively. At 30 days, overall mortality was 0.6% excluding patients with endocarditis. After 5 years re-operation rate was 2.5% and overall survival was 94.0%. During a maximum follow up of 11.2 years, reoperation rate was 5.0%, whereas overall survival was 88.5%.

Conclusions: In the present analysis, evolution of endoscopic MVS from isolated procedures in young, low-risk patients with simple MV pathology to combined procedures in older patients with complex MV disease, was demonstrated. Despite increasing surgical risk, complexity of MV disease as well as an increasing rate of concomitant procedures, perioperative outcome remained favorable over time, resulting in promising mid- to long-term results.

背景:内窥镜二尖瓣手术(MVS)已经在专门的中心发展,旨在减少手术创伤和提高恢复。本研究的目的是监测内镜下MVS的演变和时间变化。方法:2012- 2022年间,共有1.037例患者连续接受了内镜下MVS,分为初始组(2012-2017;n=487)和晚期组(2018-2022;n=550)。回顾性分析资料。结果:研究期间患者年龄从56.0(47.0 ~ 64.2)岁增加到61.0(55.0 ~ 68.0)岁(p趋势=0.0275)。结论:在目前的分析中,证明了内镜下MVS从年轻、低风险的单纯中压病变患者的单独手术到老年复杂中压病变患者的联合手术的演变。尽管手术风险增加,MV疾病的复杂性以及伴随手术的发生率增加,围手术期结果仍然良好,导致有希望的中长期结果。
{"title":"Evolution of endoscopic mitral valve surgery over a 11-year period at a high-volume center.","authors":"Jonas Pausch, Oliver Bhadra, Jessica Weimann, Xiaoqin Hua, Yousuf Alassar, Evaldas Girdauskas, Andreas Schäfer, Simon Pecha, Hermann Reichenspurner, Lenard Conradi","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic mitral valve surgery (MVS) has evolved at specialized centers aiming to reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery. The aim of this study was to monitor the evolution and temporal changes of endoscopic MVS at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 1.037 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic MVS and were categorized into an initial- (2012-2017; n=487) and a late-group (2018-2022; n=550). Data was retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient age increased during the study period from 56.0(47.0-64.2) to 61.0(55.0-68.0)years (p trend=0.0275). The prevalence of coronary artery disease (9.3vs.17.1%;p<0.001) and endocarditis (2.1vs.6.0%;p=0.0026) differed between groups. Median STS PROM score increased from 0.3(0.3-0.5) to 0.4(0.3-0.9) (p trend<0.001). MV repair was performed in 92.7%. Concomitant procedures, e.g., closure of left atrial appendage (21.0%), atrial ablation (19.2%) or tricuspid valve repair (6.7%) increased significantly over time (p trend<0.01). Nevertheless, median bypass and cross-clamp times decreased (p trend<0.001). Median postoperative ventilation time was 5.0(3.3-7.0)hours and decreased during the study-period (p trend<0.001). Length of intensive care unit and in-hospital stay were 2.0(1.0-3.0) and 7.0(6.0-9.0)days, respectively. At 30 days, overall mortality was 0.6% excluding patients with endocarditis. After 5 years re-operation rate was 2.5% and overall survival was 94.0%. During a maximum follow up of 11.2 years, reoperation rate was 5.0%, whereas overall survival was 88.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present analysis, evolution of endoscopic MVS from isolated procedures in young, low-risk patients with simple MV pathology to combined procedures in older patients with complex MV disease, was demonstrated. Despite increasing surgical risk, complexity of MV disease as well as an increasing rate of concomitant procedures, perioperative outcome remained favorable over time, resulting in promising mid- to long-term results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147484434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American heart journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1