首页 > 最新文献

The European Physical Journal H最新文献

英文 中文
Exoplanets – the beginning of a new era in astrophysics 系外行星——天体物理学新时代的开端
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2018-04-10 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2018-80063-1
Michel Mayor, Davide Cenadelli

This oral history interview touches upon important topics like the dynamics of the discovery, in 1995, of 51 Pegasi b – the first extrasolar planet ever found around a normal star other than the Sun – the development of better and better equipment that made it possible, the importance it had in shaping a new community of scholars dealing with this new field of research, and, more at large, the cultural importance it had in overturning our view of the cosmos.

这口述历史访谈触及重要话题的动态发现,1995年,51 Pegasi b -首次发现的太阳系外行星周围其他正常的恒星比太阳——更好的发展和更好的设备成为可能,它在塑造一个新的社区的重要性处理这个新领域的研究,学者,更多的,文化的重要性在颠覆我们对宇宙的看法。
{"title":"Exoplanets – the beginning of a new era in astrophysics","authors":"Michel Mayor,&nbsp;Davide Cenadelli","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2018-80063-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2018-80063-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000This oral history interview touches upon important topics like the dynamics of the discovery, in 1995, of 51 Pegasi b – the first extrasolar planet ever found around a normal star other than the Sun – the development of better and better equipment that made it possible, the importance it had in shaping a new community of scholars dealing with this new field of research, and, more at large, the cultural importance it had in overturning our view of the cosmos.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2018-80063-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4410198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
One hundred years of the cosmological constant: from “superfluous stunt” to dark energy 百年宇宙常数:从“多余的特技”到暗能量
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2018-03-16 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7
Cormac O’Raifeartaigh, Michael O’Keeffe, Werner Nahm, Simon Mitton

We present a centennial review of the history of the term known as the cosmological constant. First introduced to the general theory of relativity by Einstein in 1917 in order to describe a universe that was assumed to be static, the term fell from favour in the wake of the discovery of the expanding universe, only to make a dramatic return in recent times. We consider historical and philosophical aspects of the cosmological constant over four main epochs; (i) the use of the term in static cosmologies (both Newtonian and relativistic): (ii) the marginalization of the term following the discovery of cosmic expansion: (iii) the use of the term to address specific cosmic puzzles such as the timespan of expansion, the formation of galaxies and the redshifts of the quasars: (iv) the re-emergence of the term in today’s Λ-CDM cosmology. We find that the cosmological constant was never truly banished from theoretical models of the universe, but was marginalized by astronomers for reasons of convenience. We also find that the return of the term to the forefront of modern cosmology did not occur as an abrupt paradigm shift due to one particular set of observations, but as the result of a number of empirical advances such as the measurement of present cosmic expansion using the Hubble Space Telescope, the measurement of past expansion using type SN Ia supernovae as standard candles, and the measurement of perturbations in the cosmic microwave background by balloon and satellite. We give a brief overview of contemporary interpretations of the physics underlying the cosmic constant and conclude with a synopsis of the famous cosmological constant problem.

我们提出了一个百年回顾的历史上的术语被称为宇宙常数。1917年,爱因斯坦首次将这个词引入广义相对论,以描述一个被认为是静态的宇宙。随着宇宙膨胀的发现,这个词不再受欢迎,只是在最近才戏剧性地重新流行起来。我们考虑四个主要时期的宇宙常数的历史和哲学方面;(i)静态宇宙学(牛顿宇宙学和相对论宇宙学)对该术语的使用;(ii)在发现宇宙膨胀之后,该术语被边缘化;(iii)使用该术语来解决特定的宇宙难题,如膨胀的时间跨度、星系的形成和类星体的红移;(iv)该术语在今天的Λ-CDM宇宙学中重新出现。我们发现,宇宙常数从来没有真正从宇宙的理论模型中被排除,而是由于方便的原因被天文学家边缘化了。我们还发现,这个术语回到现代宇宙学的前沿,并不是由于一组特定的观测结果而突然发生的范式转变,而是许多经验进步的结果,例如使用哈勃太空望远镜测量当前的宇宙膨胀,使用SN Ia型超新星作为标准蜡烛测量过去的膨胀,以及使用气球和卫星测量宇宙微波背景中的扰动。我们简要概述了当代对宇宙常数背后的物理学解释,并以著名的宇宙常数问题的概要结束。
{"title":"One hundred years of the cosmological constant: from “superfluous stunt” to dark energy","authors":"Cormac O’Raifeartaigh,&nbsp;Michael O’Keeffe,&nbsp;Werner Nahm,&nbsp;Simon Mitton","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000We present a centennial review of the history of the term known as the cosmological constant. First introduced to the general theory of relativity by Einstein in 1917 in order to describe a universe that was assumed to be static, the term fell from favour in the wake of the discovery of the expanding universe, only to make a dramatic return in recent times. We consider historical and philosophical aspects of the cosmological constant over four main epochs; (i) the use of the term in static cosmologies (both Newtonian and relativistic): (ii) the marginalization of the term following the discovery of cosmic expansion: (iii) the use of the term to address specific cosmic puzzles such as the timespan of expansion, the formation of galaxies and the redshifts of the quasars: (iv) the re-emergence of the term in today’s Λ-CDM cosmology. We find that the cosmological constant was never truly banished from theoretical models of the universe, but was marginalized by astronomers for reasons of convenience. We also find that the return of the term to the forefront of modern cosmology did not occur as an abrupt paradigm shift due to one particular set of observations, but as the result of a number of empirical advances such as the measurement of present cosmic expansion using the Hubble Space Telescope, the measurement of past expansion using type SN Ia supernovae as standard candles, and the measurement of perturbations in the cosmic microwave background by balloon and satellite. We give a brief overview of contemporary interpretations of the physics underlying the cosmic constant and conclude with a synopsis of the famous <i>cosmological constant problem</i>.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 1","pages":"73 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4655329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
The evolution of modern cosmology as seen through a personal walk across six decades 现代宇宙学的演变,通过个人走过六十年
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2018-02-22 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5
Jayant V. Narlikar

This highly personal account of evolution of cosmology spans a period of approximately six decades 1959–2017. It begins when in 1959 the author, as an undergraduate at Cambridge, was attracted to the subject by the thought provoking lectures by Fred Hoyle as well as by his popular books The Nature of Universe and The Frontiers of Astronomy. The result was that after a successful performance at the Mathematical Tripos (Part III) examination, he enrolled as a research student of Hoyle. In this article the author describes the interesting works in cosmology that kept him busy both in Cambridge and in India. The issues pertinent to cosmological research in the 1960s and 1970s included the Mach’s principle, the Wheeler-Feynman theory relating the local electromagnetic arrow of time to the cosmological one, the observational tests of specific expanding universe models, and issues like singularity in quantum cosmology. However, post-1965, the nature of cosmological research changed dramatically with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). Given the assumption that the CMBR is a relic of big bang there has been a host of papers on the early universe, going as close to the big bang as the very early universe would permit: around just 10?36 s. The author argues that despite the popularity of the standard hot big bang cosmology (SBBC) it rests on rather shaky foundations. On the theoretical side there is no well established physical framework to support the SBBC; nor is there independent observational support for its assumptions like the nonbaryonic dark matter, inflation and dark energy. While technological progress has made it possible to explore the universe in greater detail with open mind, today’s cosmologists seem caught in a range of speculations in support of the big bang dogma. Thus, in modern times cosmology appears to have lost the Camelot spirit encouraging adventurous studies of the unknown. A spirit of openness is advocated to restore cosmology to its rightful position as the flagship of astronomy.

这本对宇宙学演化的高度个人化的描述跨越了1959年至2017年大约60年的时间。1959年,作为剑桥大学的一名本科生,作者被弗雷德·霍伊尔发人深省的讲座以及他的畅销书《宇宙的本质》和《天文学的前沿》所吸引,对这一主题产生了兴趣。结果是,在数学博士学位(第三部分)考试中取得成功后,他被霍伊尔大学录取为一名研究生。在这篇文章中,作者描述了让他在剑桥和印度都很忙的有趣的宇宙学工作。20世纪60年代和70年代与宇宙学研究相关的问题包括马赫原理、惠勒-费曼理论(惠勒-费曼理论将局部电磁时间箭头与宇宙时间箭头联系起来)、特定膨胀宇宙模型的观测测试,以及量子宇宙学中的奇点等问题。然而,1965年后,随着宇宙微波背景辐射(CMBR)的发现,宇宙学研究的性质发生了巨大变化。假设CMBR是大爆炸的遗迹,已经有大量关于早期宇宙的论文,在非常早期的宇宙允许的范围内尽可能接近大爆炸:大约只有10?36。作者认为,尽管标准热大爆炸宇宙论(SBBC)很受欢迎,但它建立在相当不稳定的基础上。在理论方面,没有一个很好的物理框架来支持SBBC;它的假设也没有独立的观测支持,比如非重子暗物质、暴胀和暗能量。虽然科技的进步使得以开放的心态更详细地探索宇宙成为可能,但今天的宇宙学家似乎陷入了支持大爆炸教条的一系列猜测之中。因此,在现代,宇宙学似乎已经失去了鼓励对未知进行冒险研究的卡米洛特精神。提倡开放的精神,以恢复宇宙学作为天文学旗舰的应有地位。
{"title":"The evolution of modern cosmology as seen through a personal walk across six decades","authors":"Jayant V. Narlikar","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000This highly personal account of evolution of cosmology spans a period of approximately six decades 1959–2017. It begins when in 1959 the author, as an undergraduate at Cambridge, was attracted to the subject by the thought provoking lectures by Fred Hoyle as well as by his popular books <i>The Nature of Universe and The Frontiers of Astronomy</i>. The result was that after a successful performance at the <i>Mathematical Tripos</i> (Part III) examination, he enrolled as a research student of Hoyle. In this article the author describes the interesting works in cosmology that kept him busy both in Cambridge and in India. The issues pertinent to cosmological research in the 1960s and 1970s included the Mach’s principle, the Wheeler-Feynman theory relating the local electromagnetic arrow of time to the cosmological one, the observational tests of specific expanding universe models, and issues like singularity in quantum cosmology. However, post-1965, the nature of cosmological research changed dramatically with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). Given the assumption that the CMBR is a relic of big bang there has been a host of papers on the early universe, going as close to the big bang as the very early universe would permit: around just 10<sup>?36</sup> s. The author argues that despite the popularity of the standard hot big bang cosmology (SBBC) it rests on rather shaky foundations. On the theoretical side there is no well established physical framework to support the SBBC; nor is there independent observational support for its assumptions like the nonbaryonic dark matter, inflation and dark energy. While technological progress has made it possible to explore the universe in greater detail with open mind, today’s cosmologists seem caught in a range of speculations in support of the big bang dogma. Thus, in modern times cosmology appears to have lost the Camelot spirit encouraging adventurous studies of the unknown. A spirit of openness is advocated to restore cosmology to its rightful position as the flagship of astronomy.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 1","pages":"43 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4858807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
How hadron collider experiments contributed to the development of QCD: from hard-scattering to the perfect liquid 强子对撞机实验如何促进QCD的发展:从硬散射到完美的液体
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2018-01-30 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80056-0
M. J. Tannenbaum

A revolution in elementary particle physics occurred during the period from the ICHEP1968 to the ICHEP1982 with the advent of the parton model from discoveries in Deeply Inelastic electron-proton Scattering at SLAC, neutrino experiments, hard-scattering observed in p+p collisions at the CERN ISR, the development of QCD, the discovery of the J/Ψ at BNL and SLAC and the clear observation of high transverse momentum jets at the CERN SPS p??+?p collider. These and other discoveries in this period led to the acceptance of QCD as the theory of the strong interactions. The desire to understand nuclear physics at high density such as in neutron stars led to the application of QCD to this problem and to the prediction of a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) in nuclei at high energy density and temperatures. This eventually led to the construction of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at BNL to observe superdense nuclear matter in the laboratory. This article discusses how experimental methods and results which confirmed QCD at the first hadron collider, the CERN ISR, played an important role in experiments at the first heavy ion collider, RHIC, leading to the discovery of the QGP as a perfect liquid as well as discoveries at RHIC and the LHC which continue to the present day.

从ICHEP1968到ICHEP1982,随着部分子模型的出现、SLAC深度非弹性电子-质子散射的发现、中微子实验、CERN ISR在p+p碰撞中观测到的硬散射、QCD的发展、BNL和SLAC的J/Ψ的发现以及CERN SPS的高横向动量射流的清晰观测,基本粒子物理学发生了一场革命。p对撞机。这些发现和这一时期的其他发现使人们接受QCD作为强相互作用的理论。对中子星等高密度核物理的理解,促使QCD应用于这一问题,并预测了高能密度和高温下原子核中的夸克-胶子等离子体(QGP)。这最终导致了在BNL建造相对论重离子对撞机(RHIC),在实验室中观察超致密核物质。本文讨论了在第一个强子对撞机(CERN ISR)上证实QCD的实验方法和结果如何在第一个重离子对撞机(RHIC)上的实验中发挥了重要作用,从而导致了QGP作为完美液体的发现,以及在RHIC和LHC上的发现,这些发现一直持续到今天。
{"title":"How hadron collider experiments contributed to the development of QCD: from hard-scattering to the perfect liquid","authors":"M. J. Tannenbaum","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80056-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80056-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000A revolution in elementary particle physics occurred during the period from the ICHEP1968 to the ICHEP1982 with the advent of the parton model from discoveries in Deeply Inelastic electron-proton Scattering at SLAC, neutrino experiments, hard-scattering observed in p+p collisions at the CERN ISR, the development of QCD, the discovery of the J/<i>Ψ</i> at BNL and SLAC and the clear observation of high transverse momentum jets at the CERN SPS <i>p?</i>?+?<i>p</i> collider. These and other discoveries in this period led to the acceptance of QCD as the theory of the strong interactions. The desire to understand nuclear physics at high density such as in neutron stars led to the application of QCD to this problem and to the prediction of a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) in nuclei at high energy density and temperatures. This eventually led to the construction of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at BNL to observe superdense nuclear matter in the laboratory. This article discusses how experimental methods and results which confirmed QCD at the first hadron collider, the CERN ISR, played an important role in experiments at the first heavy ion collider, RHIC, leading to the discovery of the QGP as a perfect liquid as well as discoveries at RHIC and the LHC which continue to the present day.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 2","pages":"119 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80056-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5145701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hermann Hankel’s “On the general theory of motion of fluids” 赫尔曼·汉克尔《论流体运动的一般理论》
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-12-15 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80039-6
Barbara Villone, Cornelius Rampf

The present is a companion paper to “A contemporary look at Hermann Hankel’s 1861 pioneering work on Lagrangian fluid dynamics” by Frisch, Grimberg and Villone [Eur. Phys. J. H 42, 537–556 (2017)]. Here we present the English translation of the 1861 prize manuscript from G?ttingen University “Zur allgemeinen Theorie der Bewegung der Flüssigkeiten” (On the general theory of the motion of the fluids) of Hermann Hankel (1839–1873), which was originally submitted in Latin and then translated into German by the Author for publication. We also provide the English translation of two important reports on the manuscript, one written by Bernhard Riemann and the other by Wilhelm Eduard Weber during the assessment process for the prize. Finally, we give a short biography of Hermann Hankel with his complete bibliography.

本文是由弗里施、格里姆伯格和维隆[欧元]撰写的《赫尔曼·汉克尔1861年在拉格朗日流体动力学方面的开创性工作的当代观察》的同伴论文。理论物理。[j].中华医学杂志,2012,37(2017)。在这里,我们呈现1861年G?Hermann Hankel(1839-1873)的《论流体运动的一般理论》,最初以拉丁语提交,然后由作者翻译成德语出版。我们还提供了两份关于手稿的重要报告的英文翻译,一份由Bernhard Riemann撰写,另一份由Wilhelm edward Weber在评奖过程中撰写。最后,我们给出了一个简短的传记赫尔曼汉克尔与他的完整的参考书目。
{"title":"Hermann Hankel’s “On the general theory of motion of fluids”","authors":"Barbara Villone,&nbsp;Cornelius Rampf","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80039-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80039-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000The present is a companion paper to “A contemporary look at Hermann Hankel’s 1861 pioneering work on Lagrangian fluid dynamics” by Frisch, Grimberg and Villone [Eur. Phys. J. H <b>42</b>, 537–556 (2017)]. Here we present the English translation of the 1861 prize manuscript from G?ttingen University “Zur allgemeinen Theorie der Bewegung der Flüssigkeiten” (On the general theory of the motion of the fluids) of Hermann Hankel (1839–1873), which was originally submitted in Latin and then translated into German by the Author for publication. We also provide the English translation of two important reports on the manuscript, one written by Bernhard Riemann and the other by Wilhelm Eduard Weber during the assessment process for the prize. Finally, we give a short biography of Hermann Hankel with his complete bibliography.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"557 - 609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80039-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4600601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
A contemporary look at Hermann Hankel’s 1861 pioneering work on Lagrangian fluid dynamics 赫尔曼·汉克尔1861年在拉格朗日流体动力学方面的开创性工作的当代观察
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-12-15 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80038-2
Uriel Frisch, Gérard Grimberg, Barbara Villone

The present paper is a companion to the paper by Villone and Rampf (2017), titled “Hermann Hankel’s On the general theory of motion of fluids, an essay including an English translation of the complete Preisschrift from 1861” together with connected documents [Eur. Phys. J. H 42, 557–609 (2017)]. Here we give a critical assessment of Hankel’s work, which covers many important aspects of fluid dynamics considered from a Lagrangian-coordinates point of view: variational formulation in the spirit of Hamilton for elastic (barotropic) fluids, transport (we would now say Lie transport) of vorticity, the Lagrangian significance of Clebsch variables, etc. Hankel’s work is also put in the perspective of previous and future work. Hence, the action spans about two centuries: from Lagrange’s 1760–1761 Turin paper on variational approaches to mechanics and fluid mechanics problems to Arnold’s 1966 founding paper on the geometrical/variational formulation of incompressible flow. The 22-year-old Hankel ? who was to die 12 years later — emerges as a highly innovative master of mathematical fluid dynamics, fully deserving Riemann’s assessment that his Preisschrift contains “all manner of good things.”

本论文是Villone和Rampf(2017)的论文的同伴,题为“Hermann Hankel 's On The general theory of motion of fluid,一篇文章,包括1861年完整的Preisschrift的英文翻译”以及相关文件[Eur。理论物理。[j].浙江大学学报(自然科学版),2017,557-609。在这里,我们对汉克尔的工作进行了批判性的评估,它涵盖了从拉格朗日坐标角度考虑的流体动力学的许多重要方面:弹性(正压)流体的汉密尔顿精神的变分公式,涡旋的输运(我们现在称之为李输运),克莱布什变量的拉格朗日意义,等等。汉克尔的工作也被放在以前和未来的工作的角度。因此,这一行动跨越了大约两个世纪:从拉格朗日1760年至1761年在都灵发表的关于力学和流体力学问题变分方法的论文,到阿诺德1966年关于不可压缩流动的几何/变分公式的奠基性论文。22岁的汉克尔?他在12年后去世,是一位极具创新精神的数学流体动力学大师,完全配得上黎曼的评价,即他的《预言》包含了“各种各样的好东西”。
{"title":"A contemporary look at Hermann Hankel’s 1861 pioneering work on Lagrangian fluid dynamics","authors":"Uriel Frisch,&nbsp;Gérard Grimberg,&nbsp;Barbara Villone","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80038-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80038-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000The present paper is a companion to the paper by Villone and Rampf (2017), titled “Hermann Hankel’s <i>On the general theory of motion of fluids</i>, an essay including an English translation of the complete Preisschrift from 1861” together with connected documents [Eur. Phys. J. H <b>42</b>, 557–609 (2017)]. Here we give a critical assessment of Hankel’s work, which covers many important aspects of fluid dynamics considered from a Lagrangian-coordinates point of view: variational formulation in the spirit of Hamilton for elastic (barotropic) fluids, transport (we would now say Lie transport) of vorticity, the Lagrangian significance of Clebsch variables, etc. Hankel’s work is also put in the perspective of previous and future work. Hence, the action spans about two centuries: from Lagrange’s 1760–1761 Turin paper on variational approaches to mechanics and fluid mechanics problems to Arnold’s 1966 founding paper on the geometrical/variational formulation of incompressible flow. The 22-year-old Hankel ? who was to die 12 years later — emerges as a highly innovative master of mathematical fluid dynamics, fully deserving Riemann’s assessment that his <i>Preisschrift</i> contains “all manner of good things.”\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"537 - 556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80038-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4602895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958–1993) 理论物理学的魅力(1958-1993)
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9
Luciano Maiani, Luisa Bonolis

Personal recollections on theoretical particle physics in the years when the Standard Theory was formed. In the background, the remarkable development of Italian theoretical physics in the second part of the last century, with great personalities like Bruno Touschek, Raoul Gatto, Nicola Cabibbo and their schools.

标准理论形成时个人对理论粒子物理的回忆。在此背景下,意大利理论物理学在上世纪下半叶取得了显著的发展,有布鲁诺·图谢克、拉乌尔·加托、尼古拉·卡比博和他们的学派等伟大人物。
{"title":"The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958–1993)","authors":"Luciano Maiani,&nbsp;Luisa Bonolis","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000Personal recollections on theoretical particle physics in the years when the Standard Theory was formed. In the background, the remarkable development of Italian theoretical physics in the second part of the last century, with great personalities like Bruno Touschek, Raoul Gatto, Nicola Cabibbo and their schools.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"611 - 661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4907615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Analysis of the Jun Ishiwara’s “The universal meaning of the quantum of action” 试析石原俊《作用量子的普遍意义》
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80034-x
Karla Pelogia, Carlos Alexandre Brasil

Here, we present an analysis of the paper “Universelle Bedeutung des Wirkungsquantums” (The universal meaning of the quantum of action), published by Jun Ishiwara in German in the “Proceedings of Tokyo Mathematico-Physical Society 8 (1915) 106–116”. In his work, Ishiwara, established in the Sendai University, Japan, proposed – simultaneously with Arnold Sommerfeld, William Wilson and Niels Bohr in Europe – the phase-space-integral quantization, a rule that would be incorporated into the old-quantum-theory formalism. The discussions and analysis render this paper fully accessible to undergraduate students of physics with elementary knowledge of quantum mechanics.

在这里,我们对石原君在《东京数学物理学会学报》8(1915)106-116上发表的《作用量子的普遍意义》(Universelle Bedeutung des Wirkungsquantums)一文进行了分析。石原在日本仙台大学就职,在他的工作中,他与欧洲的阿诺德·萨默菲尔德、威廉·威尔逊和尼尔斯·玻尔同时提出了相空间积分量子化,这一规则将被纳入旧的量子理论形式主义。本文的讨论和分析使具有基本量子力学知识的物理学本科学生能够完全理解本文。
{"title":"Analysis of the Jun Ishiwara’s “The universal meaning of the quantum of action”","authors":"Karla Pelogia,&nbsp;Carlos Alexandre Brasil","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80034-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80034-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000Here, we present an analysis of the paper “Universelle Bedeutung des Wirkungsquantums” (The universal meaning of the quantum of action), published by Jun Ishiwara in German in the “Proceedings of Tokyo Mathematico-Physical Society 8 (1915) 106–116”. In his work, Ishiwara, established in the Sendai University, Japan, proposed – simultaneously with Arnold Sommerfeld, William Wilson and Niels Bohr in Europe – the phase-space-integral quantization, a rule that would be incorporated into the old-quantum-theory formalism. The discussions and analysis render this paper fully accessible to undergraduate students of physics with elementary knowledge of quantum mechanics.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"507 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80034-x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4907629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The LHC timeline: a personal recollection (1980–2012) LHC时间表:个人回忆(1980-2012)
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80052-8
Luciano Maiani, Luisa Bonolis

The objective of this interview is to study the history of the Large Hadron Collider in the LEP tunnel at CERN, from first ideas to the discovery of the Brout–Englert–Higgs boson, seen from the point of view of a member of CERN scientific committees, of the CERN Council and a former Director General of CERN in the years of machine construction.

本次采访的目的是研究欧洲核子研究中心LEP隧道中的大型强子对撞机的历史,从最初的想法到发现布朗-恩格勒-希格斯玻色子,从欧洲核子研究中心科学委员会成员、欧洲核子研究中心理事会成员和欧洲核子研究中心前总干事的角度来看机器建设的岁月。
{"title":"The LHC timeline: a personal recollection (1980–2012)","authors":"Luciano Maiani,&nbsp;Luisa Bonolis","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80052-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80052-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000The objective of this interview is to study the history of the Large Hadron Collider in the LEP tunnel at CERN, from first ideas to the discovery of the Brout–Englert–Higgs boson, seen from the point of view of a member of CERN scientific committees, of the CERN Council and a former Director General of CERN in the years of machine construction.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"475 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80052-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4911743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The universal meaning of the quantum of action 作用量子的普遍意义
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1
Jun Ishiwara
{"title":"The universal meaning of the quantum of action","authors":"Jun Ishiwara","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"523 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"4907771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
期刊
The European Physical Journal H
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1