Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x
M R Bartucci
Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.
{"title":"Issues in cyclosporine drug substitution: implications for patient management.","authors":"M R Bartucci","doi":"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 3","pages":"137-42; quiz 143-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21556010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j28354x695735514
W Paris, S Dunham, A Sebastian, C Jacobs, B Nour
The question of patient nonadherence has always been an important factor in determining candidate suitability for organ transplantation. Data that explore the association of financial problems and posttransplant medication nonadherence are limited. Findings suggest that medication nonadherence was more likely to occur when recipients did not have insurance coverage and had to rely on Medicaid or indigent drug programs. Our center developed a formalized program within the outpatient pharmacy, including a full-time medication counselor who helped recipients secure resources to pay for pre- and posttransplant medications. To determine whether the availability of posttransplant medications could reduce medication nonadherence, we conducted a survey with 50 consecutive liver transplant recipients in the outpatient clinic. Nonadherence rates were significantly reduced from 25% to 10% (P < .01) compared with recipients who had been transplanted before the development of our drug program. These results suggest that optimum medication adherence can be obtained when recipients are provided guidance in securing their necessary medications without financial restriction.
{"title":"Medication nonadherence and its relation to financial restriction.","authors":"W Paris, S Dunham, A Sebastian, C Jacobs, B Nour","doi":"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j28354x695735514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j28354x695735514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question of patient nonadherence has always been an important factor in determining candidate suitability for organ transplantation. Data that explore the association of financial problems and posttransplant medication nonadherence are limited. Findings suggest that medication nonadherence was more likely to occur when recipients did not have insurance coverage and had to rely on Medicaid or indigent drug programs. Our center developed a formalized program within the outpatient pharmacy, including a full-time medication counselor who helped recipients secure resources to pay for pre- and posttransplant medications. To determine whether the availability of posttransplant medications could reduce medication nonadherence, we conducted a survey with 50 consecutive liver transplant recipients in the outpatient clinic. Nonadherence rates were significantly reduced from 25% to 10% (P < .01) compared with recipients who had been transplanted before the development of our drug program. These results suggest that optimum medication adherence can be obtained when recipients are provided guidance in securing their necessary medications without financial restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 3","pages":"149-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21556012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900303
S. Fritzsche, J. L. McCabe, R. Chinnock
Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 sequencing of the procedures generally called for renal grafting to follow the cardiac transplant as soon as hemodynamic stability was achieved. Adequate cardiac output would then provide necessary perfusion to the kidney; with the sequential procedures minimizing ischemic times. Combined heart and kidney transplant has several theoretical advantages. The recipient is exposed to only 1 set of alloantigens, thus reducing the likelihood of rejection. It is postulated, from clinical and animal models, that there is a protective mechanism in patients receiving multiple allografts from the same donor.6,11,12,14-16 Also, the patient is subjected to only 1 general anesthesia and hospitalization at the time of surgery. Results of CHKT are similar to isolated heart and kidney transplants.8,12,14-17 Rejection must be monitored in both organs because they can reject asynchronously.3,6,8,12-16,18 The experience with CHKT in children has not been well documented. In one multicenter report, clinical outcomes are described in 82 CHKT recipients ranging in age from 8 to 65 years, but the pediatric recipient results are not discussed.14 Only 3 reported cases exist of CHKT in patients aged 17 years or younger.11,17,18 Livesey et al18 performed a CHKT in a 17-year-old adolescent boy with familial dilated cardiomyopathy and nonspecific glomerulonephritis. Savdie et al11 performed the procedure on Rare combined heart and kidney transplant in a pediatric patient: a case study
{"title":"Rare Combined Heart and Kidney Transplant in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Study","authors":"S. Fritzsche, J. L. McCabe, R. Chinnock","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900303","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 sequencing of the procedures generally called for renal grafting to follow the cardiac transplant as soon as hemodynamic stability was achieved. Adequate cardiac output would then provide necessary perfusion to the kidney; with the sequential procedures minimizing ischemic times. Combined heart and kidney transplant has several theoretical advantages. The recipient is exposed to only 1 set of alloantigens, thus reducing the likelihood of rejection. It is postulated, from clinical and animal models, that there is a protective mechanism in patients receiving multiple allografts from the same donor.6,11,12,14-16 Also, the patient is subjected to only 1 general anesthesia and hospitalization at the time of surgery. Results of CHKT are similar to isolated heart and kidney transplants.8,12,14-17 Rejection must be monitored in both organs because they can reject asynchronously.3,6,8,12-16,18 The experience with CHKT in children has not been well documented. In one multicenter report, clinical outcomes are described in 82 CHKT recipients ranging in age from 8 to 65 years, but the pediatric recipient results are not discussed.14 Only 3 reported cases exist of CHKT in patients aged 17 years or younger.11,17,18 Livesey et al18 performed a CHKT in a 17-year-old adolescent boy with familial dilated cardiomyopathy and nonspecific glomerulonephritis. Savdie et al11 performed the procedure on Rare combined heart and kidney transplant in a pediatric patient: a case study","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"145 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900303","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65465943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900312
K. A. Evers, D. D. Lewis
Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 bank in reviewing death records to improve identification of potential donors.3 These reviews, when modified, can not only report the potential for brain-dead donors, but also for NHBD. In 1997, Daemen et al4 estimated that, after reviewing 109 charts from a major university hospital in the Netherlands, 56 potential non–heart-beating donors were identified, which related to 4.5 to 9.2 potential non–heart-beating donors per 100 hospital deaths. After modifying the death-record review to include NHBD, an OPO was able to estimate its non–heartbeating and brain-death potential donors in a large urban level 1 trauma center. This discussion will report the findings of that review, compare the number of potential brain-dead and non–heart-beating donors, and then estimate the increase in the number of available kidneys for transplantation if NHBD is pursued.
{"title":"Estimating the Non—Heart-Beating Donor Potential at a Trauma Center","authors":"K. A. Evers, D. D. Lewis","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900312","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 bank in reviewing death records to improve identification of potential donors.3 These reviews, when modified, can not only report the potential for brain-dead donors, but also for NHBD. In 1997, Daemen et al4 estimated that, after reviewing 109 charts from a major university hospital in the Netherlands, 56 potential non–heart-beating donors were identified, which related to 4.5 to 9.2 potential non–heart-beating donors per 100 hospital deaths. After modifying the death-record review to include NHBD, an OPO was able to estimate its non–heartbeating and brain-death potential donors in a large urban level 1 trauma center. This discussion will report the findings of that review, compare the number of potential brain-dead and non–heart-beating donors, and then estimate the increase in the number of available kidneys for transplantation if NHBD is pursued.","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"186 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65466467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j9386t727g0585r0
S D Fritzsche, J L McCabe, R E Chinnock
Multiple reports of successful combined heart and kidney transplants adults suggest that this may be a viable option for a small subset of patients with coexisting end-stage heart and kidney failure. A review of the literature, however, reveals that few combined heart and kidney transplants have been reported in children. This article presents the case of a 13-year-old boy who underwent unsuccessful palliative surgery for a congenital heart defect. The patient developed heart failure with subsequent acute renal failure, and ultimately required a combined heart and kidney transplant. The combined procedure was successful in this patient and he is alive and well 27 months postoperatively.
{"title":"Rare combined heart and kidney transplant in a pediatric patient: a case study.","authors":"S D Fritzsche, J L McCabe, R E Chinnock","doi":"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j9386t727g0585r0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.j9386t727g0585r0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple reports of successful combined heart and kidney transplants adults suggest that this may be a viable option for a small subset of patients with coexisting end-stage heart and kidney failure. A review of the literature, however, reveals that few combined heart and kidney transplants have been reported in children. This article presents the case of a 13-year-old boy who underwent unsuccessful palliative surgery for a congenital heart defect. The patient developed heart failure with subsequent acute renal failure, and ultimately required a combined heart and kidney transplant. The combined procedure was successful in this patient and he is alive and well 27 months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 3","pages":"145-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21556011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900306
S. Randolph, K. Scholz
Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 stay to be the key factor explaining transplant charge variances. Posttransplant hospital stays, therefore, became a major area targeted to reduce transplant costs. As a result, transplant centers consistently discharge patients earlier, often using alternate site care to support patient recovery and ensure uncompromised patient care. Additionally, many transplant centers now compete for “Centers of Excellence” status with payor organizations or for inclusion into transplant networks to help direct patients into their programs. The impact of this trend can been seen wherever patients may have to travel outside their community or state to receive treatment. In fact, patients from the same community may now receive transplants at multiple sites. These trends have also had a major impact on the home care industry. As a result of early discharge, patients are now being managed in the home care setting at a higher acuity level than ever before. Additionally, the home care provider is coordinating care for patients discharged from multiple transplant centers, each with its own set of unique protocols and patient education guidelines. Patients and their caregivers do not have the luxury of a prolonged hospital stay and are frequently overwhelmed by the reality of the transplant and the posttransplant responsibilities and lifestyle changes. They may not have absorbed all Self-care guidelines: finding a common ground
{"title":"Self-Care Guidelines: Finding a Common Ground","authors":"S. Randolph, K. Scholz","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900306","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 stay to be the key factor explaining transplant charge variances. Posttransplant hospital stays, therefore, became a major area targeted to reduce transplant costs. As a result, transplant centers consistently discharge patients earlier, often using alternate site care to support patient recovery and ensure uncompromised patient care. Additionally, many transplant centers now compete for “Centers of Excellence” status with payor organizations or for inclusion into transplant networks to help direct patients into their programs. The impact of this trend can been seen wherever patients may have to travel outside their community or state to receive treatment. In fact, patients from the same community may now receive transplants at multiple sites. These trends have also had a major impact on the home care industry. As a result of early discharge, patients are now being managed in the home care setting at a higher acuity level than ever before. Additionally, the home care provider is coordinating care for patients discharged from multiple transplant centers, each with its own set of unique protocols and patient education guidelines. Patients and their caregivers do not have the luxury of a prolonged hospital stay and are frequently overwhelmed by the reality of the transplant and the posttransplant responsibilities and lifestyle changes. They may not have absorbed all Self-care guidelines: finding a common ground","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"156 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900306","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65465652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900301
J. Craven, J. Schaefers
{"title":"Quality of Life after Transplantation","authors":"J. Craven, J. Schaefers","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900301","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"135 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900301","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65465756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900310
M. Bires
Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 Establishing the Designated Requestor Program Before the designated requestor program was presented to a hospital, the OPO set criteria for participation that demonstrated the hospital’s commitment to the program. First, the hospital was required to demonstrate 100% compliance with its own policy of routine referral of every death and impending death for 1 year. The compliance was validated through a death record review conducted by the OPO. The hospital was then asked to choose participants based on their support of donation and their availability to provide appropriate support to the grieving family. These participants had to have experience working with families throughout the donation process, and have a strong personal belief in donation. Also, participants had to accept brain death and be comfortable and knowledgeable about donation issues. The participants who were identified by the hospital attended an 8-hour designated requestor program conducted by the OPO. This training, developed by CORE, is based on the foundation of assessment of the family’s understanding and acceptance of brain death and the importance of decoupling. The objectives of the designated requestor program were stated, and an overview of the donation process was presented to provide basic knowledge of the process. This overview Comparison of consent rates between hospital-based designated requestors and organ procurement coordinators
{"title":"Comparison of Consent Rates between Hospital-Based Designated Requestors and Organ Procurement Coordinators","authors":"M. Bires","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900310","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 Establishing the Designated Requestor Program Before the designated requestor program was presented to a hospital, the OPO set criteria for participation that demonstrated the hospital’s commitment to the program. First, the hospital was required to demonstrate 100% compliance with its own policy of routine referral of every death and impending death for 1 year. The compliance was validated through a death record review conducted by the OPO. The hospital was then asked to choose participants based on their support of donation and their availability to provide appropriate support to the grieving family. These participants had to have experience working with families throughout the donation process, and have a strong personal belief in donation. Also, participants had to accept brain death and be comfortable and knowledgeable about donation issues. The participants who were identified by the hospital attended an 8-hour designated requestor program conducted by the OPO. This training, developed by CORE, is based on the foundation of assessment of the family’s understanding and acceptance of brain death and the importance of decoupling. The objectives of the designated requestor program were stated, and an overview of the donation process was presented to provide basic knowledge of the process. This overview Comparison of consent rates between hospital-based designated requestors and organ procurement coordinators","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"177 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65466277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.m1w82kq86r437337
M H Bires
Recent legislation in our service area has put restrictions on who is allowed to approach families about donation. Many hospitals have therefore requested training for designated requestors to speak with families. The organ procurement organization followed the consent rate of 2 hospitals to evaluate the effectiveness of the designated requestors in the consent process. This article compares the success of the hospital-based designated requestor program in obtaining consent with that of another hospital, which relies solely on the organ procurement coordinator to approach families. Thirteen staff members in hospital A received the 8-hour designated requestor training. A decrease in the consent rate at hospital A prompted the organ procurement organization to interview the 13 requestors. Possible reasons for the decline ranged from lack of experience to the lack of identification as donor family advocate. Both hospitals were encouraged to consider a multidisciplinary approach, which includes the organ procurement coordinator in the request process.
{"title":"Comparison of consent rates between hospital-based designated requestors and organ procurement coordinators.","authors":"M H Bires","doi":"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.m1w82kq86r437337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.m1w82kq86r437337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent legislation in our service area has put restrictions on who is allowed to approach families about donation. Many hospitals have therefore requested training for designated requestors to speak with families. The organ procurement organization followed the consent rate of 2 hospitals to evaluate the effectiveness of the designated requestors in the consent process. This article compares the success of the hospital-based designated requestor program in obtaining consent with that of another hospital, which relies solely on the organ procurement coordinator to approach families. Thirteen staff members in hospital A received the 8-hour designated requestor training. A decrease in the consent rate at hospital A prompted the organ procurement organization to interview the 13 requestors. Possible reasons for the decline ranged from lack of experience to the lack of identification as donor family advocate. Both hospitals were encouraged to consider a multidisciplinary approach, which includes the organ procurement coordinator in the request process.</p>","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 3","pages":"177-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21555262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-09-01DOI: 10.1177/090591999900900304
W. Paris, S. Dunham, A. Sebastian, C. Jacobs, B. Nour
Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 medication nonadherence is considered a psychosocial issue (ie, pathologic), requiring a clinical intervention rather than a financial one. Only recently, there has been a serious exploration of the relationship between financial factors and medication nonadherence.4-6 In 1994, using factors based on clinical observation, the Integris Oklahoma Transplantation Institute explored the relationship of medication nonadherence (immunosuppressive and other medications) among 100 consecutive heart transplant recipients seen in the outpatient clinic.7 Outpatient nurse coordinators, who were unaware of the purposes of the study, collected data from patient interviews and review of the medical chart. Nonadherence was defined as “had not taken the medications as prescribed on, at least, 1 (or more) occasions out of 10.” Twenty-five percent of the recipients were found to be nonadherent with regard to at least 1 or more of their overall medication therapy (excluding immunosuppressive medications), but only 3% of these recipients were nonadherent with regard to their immunosuppressive medications. Nonadherent recipients were more likely (P<.01) to have been dependent on state Medicaid and/or multiple indigent drug programs. It was concluded that if optimum transplant results were to be obtained, every effort must be made to provide recipients with the Medication nonadherence and its relation to financial restriction
{"title":"Medication Nonadherence and its Relation to Financial Restriction","authors":"W. Paris, S. Dunham, A. Sebastian, C. Jacobs, B. Nour","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900304","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Transplant Coordination, Vol. 9, Number 3, September 1999 medication nonadherence is considered a psychosocial issue (ie, pathologic), requiring a clinical intervention rather than a financial one. Only recently, there has been a serious exploration of the relationship between financial factors and medication nonadherence.4-6 In 1994, using factors based on clinical observation, the Integris Oklahoma Transplantation Institute explored the relationship of medication nonadherence (immunosuppressive and other medications) among 100 consecutive heart transplant recipients seen in the outpatient clinic.7 Outpatient nurse coordinators, who were unaware of the purposes of the study, collected data from patient interviews and review of the medical chart. Nonadherence was defined as “had not taken the medications as prescribed on, at least, 1 (or more) occasions out of 10.” Twenty-five percent of the recipients were found to be nonadherent with regard to at least 1 or more of their overall medication therapy (excluding immunosuppressive medications), but only 3% of these recipients were nonadherent with regard to their immunosuppressive medications. Nonadherent recipients were more likely (P<.01) to have been dependent on state Medicaid and/or multiple indigent drug programs. It was concluded that if optimum transplant results were to be obtained, every effort must be made to provide recipients with the Medication nonadherence and its relation to financial restriction","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"149 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900304","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65465997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}