Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)最新文献

Bone loss and fractures are common complications of heart and liver transplantation, and are likely related to high-dose immunosuppressive therapy. We have previously demonstrated that many patients with end-stage lung disease already have osteoporosis and may be at even greater risk for fracture after lung transplantation. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of fracture in lung transplant recipients on osteoporosis prevention regimens, the relationship of fracture to pretransplant bone mineral density, and the impact of fracture on quality of life after lung transplantation. Twenty-one lung transplant candidates were prospectively evaluated with spine radiographs and bone mineral densitometry. Bone density was expressed as T scores, the number of standard deviations from the mean bone density of a young normal population of the same gender. Of 21 patients, 8 (38%) fractured during the first year. The mean pretransplant lumbar spine T score was significantly lower in the fracture patients (P = .03). Four of the 7 surviving fracture patients and 1 of the 10 patients who survived without fracture believed that chronic pain diminished their quality of life (X2 = 4.408; P = .04). These findings suggest that bone mineral density should be routinely included in the evaluation of lung transplant candidates. Patients with extremely low bone density or osteoporotic fracture should be counseled about the increased risk of fracture after transplantation.

Kidney transplantation has become a reasonable treatment option for selected patients aged 60 years or older, and a number of different immunosuppressive drug protocols have been described. This article concerns 230 recipients who were aged 60 years or older and who were undergoing kidney-only transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh between January 1990 and April 1997. All recipients were treated with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. The median follow-up was 31.5 months (range, 1-86). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 90%, 83%, and 76%, respectively. There were 42 (19%) deaths, cardiovascular disease (50%) and infection (38%) being the main causes. Death with a functioning kidney occurred in 28 (67%) patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial graft survival rates were 84%, 74%, and 64%, respectively. The delayed graft function rate was 33%. Rejection was seen in 57 (25%) elderly patients. The mean serum creatinine was 2.6 +/- 2.7 mg/dL and the serum urea nitrogen was 35 +/- 22 mg/dL. The mean tacrolimus level was 8.5 +/- 3.8 ng/mL. These results suggest that renal transplantation in older recipients under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with reasonable outcomes, and can be offered to appropriately selected patients.

Context: Tacrolimus, microemulsion cyclosporine (Neoral), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 2 and 3 grams daily have demonstrated superior immunosuppressive properties in several recent clinical trials involving solid-organ transplants. An effective immunosuppression may be maintained with lower doses of MMF administered with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporine.

Objective: To compare tacrolimus plus "low-dose" MMF-based immunosuppressive regimen (TMBIR) with Neoral plus "low-dose" MMF-based immunosuppressive regimens (NMBIR) among kidney transplant recipients.

Design: Prospective, randomized study.

Patients: 53 consecutive adult recipients of kidney transplant. Both groups (TMBIR and NMBIR) were equally matched on demographic characteristics.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive orally either tacrolimus (0.08 mg/kg twice daily) (n = 27) or Neoral (4 mg/kg twice daily) (n = 26). Both regimens were started before surgery and continued when allograft demonstrated no postoperative acute tubular necrosis. Both groups received similar "low-dose" MMF (500 mg twice daily) and prednisone (2 mg/kg/day to taper off after 1 year). Switch from tacrolimus to Neoral or vice versa was allowed after refractory rejection or serious adverse events.

Main outcome measure: Acute rejection and patient and graft survival 1 year following kidney transplant.

Results: One-year patient survival rates were 88.9% for the TMBIR group and 100% for the NMBIR group; 1-year graft survival rates were 88.9% for the TMBIR group and 96.1% for the NMBIR group. No significant differences were found in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (14.8% TMBIR vs 23% NMBIR). Steroid-resistant rejections requiring cytolytic antibody therapy were higher in the NMBIR group (50% vs 25%). Three patients crossed over from NMBIR to TMBIR for refractory rejections and 1 patient crossed over from TMBIR to NMBIR for new onset seizure. Three episodes of cytomegalovirus infection were observed in the TMBIR group. Other adverse events were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Both tacrolimus and microemulsion cyclosporine combined with "low-dose" MMF and corticosteroids provide effective immunosuppression and have similar adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.