Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)最新文献

A significant number of donor organs emanate from the medical examiner's or coroner's offices, because victims of head injuries from vehicular accidents, falls, assaults, gunshot injuries, and unattended cerebrovascular accidents fall under the jurisdiction of the medical examiner or coroner. Unfortunately, many organ procurement organizations may not fully understand the legal responsibilities of the medical examiner. Most of the medical examiner or coroner cases could be used without compromising the medical-legal responsibilities of the medical examiner or coroner if a reliable description of the respective organ could be made after surgical removal by either having a pathologist present or by having the surgeon prepare a description of the respective organ. The objective of this paper is to present a series of protocols that have been designed to describe the heart, lungs, liver, kidney, and spleen for use by organ transplant surgeons. These protocols have proven to be highly successful in making more organs available for transplantation.

Medical decisions about organ donation and transplantation are considered by a growing number of individuals. The complex issue of whether and to what extent organ recipients and donor families should interact or communicate has gained increasing public awareness, thereby creating an area of major ethical and legal concern for the transplant community. Communication issues have traditionally been decided by transplant coordinators and guided by personal beliefs, agency guidelines, and organizational policies. Organizations are often inconsistent in their practices, and this in turn causes frustration and confusion for both donor families and transplant recipients. This study explored how the experience of meeting the recipient(s) of a loved one's organ affected the grieving process of donor families and altered their lives. The information from this study might be useful to transplant professionals to develop guidelines and policies that lessen the confusion and frustration felt by those involved with the transplant process.

Context: Efforts to increase organ donation include serious attempts in hospital settings, where unrealized donation potential exists. Research on hospital donation must include understanding organizational as well as patient-specific influences on the donation process.

Objective: To identify organizational characteristics that distinguish hospitals producing organ donations from those that do not, and to estimate the number of nondonor hospitals with donor potential.

Design: Data from the American Hospital Association's 1992 annual survey of hospitals were matched to Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network information from the United Network for Organ Sharing regarding the number of solid-organ donors in 1992. Hospitals with donation capability were identified, based on bed size and factors necessary to produce successful donor maintenance and organ recovery. Based on statistical analyses, organizational characteristics distinguishing donor hospitals from nondonor hospitals were identified. We also compared the number of donors and the number of donor hospitals in 1992 and 1996.

Setting: United States.

Results: Among all hospitals affiliated with the American Hospital Association (n = 5607), 1214 (22%) were identified as donor hospitals (> or = 1 donation in 1992). Of 2333 hospitals with procurement capability, 1268 (54%) produced no donors in 1992. Based on a multiple logistic regression model, donor hospitals differed from nondonor hospitals by hospital ownership, with municipally owned hospitals more likely and federally owned hospitals less likely to produce donation, compared with for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals. Other organizational characteristics associated with donor hospitals were level of trauma services, whether the hospital had a transplant surgery program or a hospital ethics committee, and whether it was located in the South Atlantic, Southwest Central, or Pacific regions of the United States.

Conclusions: Among hospitals not currently producing organ donations, there is a sizable subgroup with donor potential. This area merits further attention.

Context: Kidney preservation has been performed by either ice (static) or machine pulsatile perfusion. Ice storage is simple, with only 1 methodology. Machine perfusion, on the other hand, is accomplished using multiple methodologies. This article delineates the different methodologies of pumping centers throughout the country.

Objective: Pulsatile machine perfusion is again being viewed as the preservation method of choice for kidneys from non-heart-beating cadaver donors and cadaver kidneys from marginal donors. To develop indices to predict the viability of cadaver kidneys for transplant, a review of the organ procurement organizations, specific perfusion techniques, and a comparison of the delayed graft function and graft survival rates were considered.

Methods: A survey, asking for specifics on perfusion parameters, pulsatile machine perfusion experience, and criteria for perfusion implementation and graft survival results, was mailed to all organ procurement organizations in the United States.

Results: Of the 44 centers that responded to the survey, 12 used pulsatile machine perfusion (11 used the Waters perfusion machine), 6 pumped marginal cadaver kidneys, and the remaining 6 pumped all cadaver kidneys. Minimum perfusion criteria, pulse rates, perfusate composition, pressures, renal resistance, and renal pressure and flow were considered. Vasodilators and other machine additives were used to improve flow. The variance in each center's number of cadaver kidneys pumped each year, as well as the differences in pump times, was noted.

Conclusion: Twelve centers use pulsatile machine perfusion. A variety of techniques are used to perform pulsatile machine perfusion, but 11 of 12 have less delayed graft function than those programs employing ice storage preservation.

Maximizing kidney transplant patients' long-term compliance with immunosuppressants is a major challenge to transplant coordinators. Although previous research has found substantial proportions of recipients to be noncompliant, predictors of noncompliance and characteristics of noncompliers remain unclear. In this study of more than 1400 kidney transplant patients, we found noncompliance to be associated with patient and transplant characteristics and with patient beliefs concerning the efficacy of immunosuppressants. Three distinct profiles of noncompliers were identified: accidental noncompliers, invulnerables, and decisive noncompliers. This information can be used by transplant coordinators to recognize cues that predict noncompliance and to work with at-risk patients to forestall or remedy noncompliant behavior.

Organ transplantation is a psychosocially demanding process. Patients must undergo a comprehensive evaluation to await a donor organ that may never become available. After transplantation, recipients must deal with the acceptance of a new organ and comply with a medical regimen that includes numerous medications, follow-up exams, and procedures. Emotional well-being is monitored throughout the transplant process. However, despite the best of efforts and thorough pretransplant bio-psycho-social evaluations, it is possible for patients to have significant psychopathology that remains undetected. Following the stress of transplantation, such patients may present with exacerbation of symptomatology, which has the potential to negatively affect compliance and long-term outcome.