Juan Antonio García, Bernardo Rodamilans, Sandra Martínez-Turiño, Adrian A. Valli, Carmen Simón-Mateo, Mariano Cambra
The study of Potyvirus plumpoxi (plum pox virus, PPV) has a long history, beginning with its foundational description by Atanassof in 1932 in Bulgaria. Interest in the virus has significantly increased over the past decades, as evidenced by a rise in published articles, highlighting its importance in plant pathology. Research on PPV offers broader insights into the biology and pathology of the extensive Potyviridae virus family to which it belongs. The virus's large strain diversity and wide host range make it a key subject for research into plant–virus interactions, host adaptation and virus evolution. PPV causes sharka, the most damaging disease affecting stone fruit trees. Economic losses from sharka disease have recently been estimated at over €2.4 thousand million for the last 28 years. The significance of this disease is further amplified by the ease of aphid-mediated transmission from infected plant material and the virus's ability to establish and spread to new regions, making it a global agricultural challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various biological traits of PPV and will form the basis of an updated version on the Association of Applied Biologists Description of Plant Viruses for PPV.
{"title":"Plum pox virus: An overview of the potyvirus behind sharka, a harmful stone fruit disease","authors":"Juan Antonio García, Bernardo Rodamilans, Sandra Martínez-Turiño, Adrian A. Valli, Carmen Simón-Mateo, Mariano Cambra","doi":"10.1111/aab.12958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12958","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study of <i>Potyvirus plumpoxi</i> (plum pox virus, PPV) has a long history, beginning with its foundational description by Atanassof in 1932 in Bulgaria. Interest in the virus has significantly increased over the past decades, as evidenced by a rise in published articles, highlighting its importance in plant pathology. Research on PPV offers broader insights into the biology and pathology of the extensive <i>Potyviridae</i> virus family to which it belongs. The virus's large strain diversity and wide host range make it a key subject for research into plant–virus interactions, host adaptation and virus evolution. PPV causes sharka, the most damaging disease affecting stone fruit trees. Economic losses from sharka disease have recently been estimated at over €2.4 thousand million for the last 28 years. The significance of this disease is further amplified by the ease of aphid-mediated transmission from infected plant material and the virus's ability to establish and spread to new regions, making it a global agricultural challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various biological traits of PPV and will form the basis of an updated version on the Association of Applied Biologists Description of Plant Viruses for PPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 1","pages":"49-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12958","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rhopalosiphum padi L. is one of the most devastating cereal aphids in the world. Its feeding does not induce a clear phytotoxic response in plants. Little information is available on defence response triggered by R. padi feeding on wild wheats, frequently used to improve hexaploid wheat. An attempt has been made to understand the differential biochemical and molecular responses of R. padi feeding on moderately resistant and susceptible Aegilops tauschii genotypes. RNA-Seq based transcriptomic analysis was conducted on 14 day-old leaf tissues of moderately aphid resistant (R) genotype (Ae. tauschii pau14232) and susceptible (S) genotype (Ae. tauschii pau14138) infested with R. padi for 12, 24 and 48 h. Plant response to aphid infestation was comparatively faster in R genotype. A total of 10,589 genes were altered in R genotype in comparison to only 8068 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in S genotypes. There was a gradual increase in significant DEGs from 12 to 48 h after R. padi infestation in R (4931–6582) and S genotype (4860–5736). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis revealed that 18 pathway genes were differentially expressed in R and S genotypes at different feeding time intervals. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs after R. padi feeding indicated up-regulation of genes for secondary metabolite synthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging, transcription factors (ethylene responsive transcript factor [ERF], NAC, WRKY, MADS-box and Myb) and salicylic acid and ethylene signalling pathways in R genotype while down-regulation in S genotype. However, photosynthesis and light-harvesting DEGs were down-regulated in both the genotypes resulting in decreased chlorophyll content. Biochemical analysis showed that R. padi feeding induced substantial hydrogen peroxide accumulation in R genotype unlike in S genotype. Also, activities of peroxidase and catalase were comparatively higher in R than S genotype, confirming efficient ROS-scavenging in R genotype. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction expression validation studies of 11 DEGs followed same trend as in RNA-Seq data. Our study concluded up-regulation of stress response genes, salicylate and ethylene signalling pathways and efficient ROS-scavenging imparted a fitness advantage to R genotype during R. padi attack, resulting in reduced nymphiposition and nymphal survival. These findings will help in understanding the mechanism of host plant resistance and the development of aphid resistant wheat varieties.
{"title":"Comparative biochemical and transcriptomic analyses reveal the bases of Rhopalosiphum padi L. resistance in Aegilops tauschii Coss.","authors":"Deepika Narang, Beant Singh, Satvir Kaur Grewal, Satinder Kaur, Parveen Chhuneja","doi":"10.1111/aab.12950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Rhopalosiphum padi</i> L. is one of the most devastating cereal aphids in the world. Its feeding does not induce a clear phytotoxic response in plants. Little information is available on defence response triggered by <i>R. padi</i> feeding on wild wheats, frequently used to improve hexaploid wheat. An attempt has been made to understand the differential biochemical and molecular responses of <i>R. padi</i> feeding on moderately resistant and susceptible <i>Aegilops tauschii</i> genotypes. RNA-Seq based transcriptomic analysis was conducted on 14 day-old leaf tissues of moderately aphid resistant (R) genotype (<i>Ae. tauschii</i> pau14232) and susceptible (S) genotype (<i>Ae. tauschii</i> pau14138) infested with <i>R. padi</i> for 12, 24 and 48 h. Plant response to aphid infestation was comparatively faster in R genotype. A total of 10,589 genes were altered in R genotype in comparison to only 8068 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in S genotypes. There was a gradual increase in significant DEGs from 12 to 48 h after <i>R. padi</i> infestation in R (4931–6582) and S genotype (4860–5736). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis revealed that 18 pathway genes were differentially expressed in R and S genotypes at different feeding time intervals. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs after <i>R. padi</i> feeding indicated up-regulation of genes for secondary metabolite synthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging, transcription factors (ethylene responsive transcript factor [ERF], NAC, WRKY, MADS-box and Myb) and salicylic acid and ethylene signalling pathways in R genotype while down-regulation in S genotype. However, photosynthesis and light-harvesting DEGs were down-regulated in both the genotypes resulting in decreased chlorophyll content. Biochemical analysis showed that <i>R. padi</i> feeding induced substantial hydrogen peroxide accumulation in R genotype unlike in S genotype. Also, activities of peroxidase and catalase were comparatively higher in R than S genotype, confirming efficient ROS-scavenging in R genotype. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction expression validation studies of 11 DEGs followed same trend as in RNA-Seq data. Our study concluded up-regulation of stress response genes, salicylate and ethylene signalling pathways and efficient ROS-scavenging imparted a fitness advantage to R genotype during <i>R. padi</i> attack, resulting in reduced nymphiposition and nymphal survival. These findings will help in understanding the mechanism of host plant resistance and the development of aphid resistant wheat varieties.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 2","pages":"168-180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143497145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evgenia Sarakatsani, Jay Darryl L. Ermio, Shahinoor Rahman, Patrizia Bella, Alfonso Agrò, Mirella Lo Pinto, Ezio Peri, Stefano Colazza, Bart Lievens, Michael Rostás, Antonino Cusumano
Flowering plants can be introduced in modern agroecosystems to support resident natural enemies in the context of Conservation Biological Control (CBC). Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) (Polygonales: Polygonaceae) has been shown to enhance the longevity of several parasitoids through the provision of high quality and easily accessible floral nectar. Yet floral nectar is ubiquitously colonized by microbes which can change nectar chemistry with consequences for parasitoids. Nonetheless, how bacteria associated with buckwheat floral nectar affect parasitoid performance is not known. In this study, adult females of Trissolcus basalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two parasitoids of Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), were provided with synthetic nectar fermented by 14 bacterial isolates originating from buckwheat nectar. We recorded the effect of bacterial fermentation on female longevity and nectar chemistry. In the case of T. basalis, females consuming nectar fermented by Bacillus sp., Brevibacillus sp., Brevibacterium frigoritolerans, Saccharibacillus endophyticus, and Terribacillus saccharophilus significantly enhanced their longevity compared with females fed with non-fermented nectar. For O. telenomicida, enhanced longevity was recorded only in the case of B. frigoritolerans and Pantoea dispersa. For both parasitoids, no negative effects due to bacterial fermentation of nectar were recorded. Chemical investigations of bacteria-fermented nectars revealed an increased diversity in the composition of sugars and sugar alcohols, whereas non-fermented nectar only contained sucrose. Our findings show that nectar-inhabiting bacteria are important “hidden players” in the interactions between flowers and parasitoids, an indication that a better understanding of plant–microbe–insect interactions could improve CBC programmes.
{"title":"Nectar-inhabiting bacteria differently affect the longevity of co-occurring egg parasitoid species by modifying nectar chemistry","authors":"Evgenia Sarakatsani, Jay Darryl L. Ermio, Shahinoor Rahman, Patrizia Bella, Alfonso Agrò, Mirella Lo Pinto, Ezio Peri, Stefano Colazza, Bart Lievens, Michael Rostás, Antonino Cusumano","doi":"10.1111/aab.12959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12959","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flowering plants can be introduced in modern agroecosystems to support resident natural enemies in the context of Conservation Biological Control (CBC). Buckwheat (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i>) (Polygonales: Polygonaceae) has been shown to enhance the longevity of several parasitoids through the provision of high quality and easily accessible floral nectar. Yet floral nectar is ubiquitously colonized by microbes which can change nectar chemistry with consequences for parasitoids. Nonetheless, how bacteria associated with buckwheat floral nectar affect parasitoid performance is not known. In this study, adult females of <i>Trissolcus basalis</i> (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and <i>Ooencyrtus telenomicida</i> (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two parasitoids of <i>Nezara viridula</i> (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), were provided with synthetic nectar fermented by 14 bacterial isolates originating from buckwheat nectar. We recorded the effect of bacterial fermentation on female longevity and nectar chemistry. In the case of <i>T. basalis</i>, females consuming nectar fermented by <i>Bacillus</i> sp., <i>Brevibacillus</i> sp., <i>Brevibacterium frigoritolerans</i>, <i>Saccharibacillus endophyticus</i>, and <i>Terribacillus saccharophilus</i> significantly enhanced their longevity compared with females fed with non-fermented nectar. For <i>O. telenomicida</i>, enhanced longevity was recorded only in the case of <i>B. frigoritolerans</i> and <i>Pantoea dispersa</i>. For both parasitoids, no negative effects due to bacterial fermentation of nectar were recorded. Chemical investigations of bacteria-fermented nectars revealed an increased diversity in the composition of sugars and sugar alcohols, whereas non-fermented nectar only contained sucrose. Our findings show that nectar-inhabiting bacteria are important “hidden players” in the interactions between flowers and parasitoids, an indication that a better understanding of plant–microbe–insect interactions could improve CBC programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 2","pages":"204-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12959","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143497264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Organic manure plays an important role in soil fertility, microbial communities and sustainable agricultural strategies. In organic cultivation of crops, manures are mostly used without any calculation of the nutrients added to soil through their application. The quantities of nutrients supplied by the organic manures to the crop have to equalize the quantity of nutrients supplied by inorganic chemical fertilizers, in order to replace chemical fertilizers in organic farming. Since the organic manures release nutrients slowly into the soil over a period of time, the availability of nutrients to the standing crop requires precise estimation. In the present study, the amount of nutrients available in the soil as well as in all the manures was calculated. Moreover, the study included metagenomic analysis of different organic manures used by farmers and gives an insight to the role the microbiome plays in plant growth. Using a formula of STCR-IPNS (soil test crop response integrated plant nutrition system), the quantities of different combinations of organic manures required to supply nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) to sunflower plants were calculated. Organic manure combinations using animal bone meal, neem cake, farmyard manure and vermicompost recorded better growth and yield responses in sunflower plants compared to inorganic chemical fertilizers. Based on the estimation of NPK in the individual manures and in the soil, pot experiments were carried out to understand the effect of organic manures as well as inorganic fertilizers in the vegetative and reproductive growth of sunflower.
{"title":"Microbiome and nutrient dynamics of organic manures for precision NPK management in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)","authors":"Babitha Joseph, Subramanian Babu","doi":"10.1111/aab.12955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12955","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic manure plays an important role in soil fertility, microbial communities and sustainable agricultural strategies. In organic cultivation of crops, manures are mostly used without any calculation of the nutrients added to soil through their application. The quantities of nutrients supplied by the organic manures to the crop have to equalize the quantity of nutrients supplied by inorganic chemical fertilizers, in order to replace chemical fertilizers in organic farming. Since the organic manures release nutrients slowly into the soil over a period of time, the availability of nutrients to the standing crop requires precise estimation. In the present study, the amount of nutrients available in the soil as well as in all the manures was calculated. Moreover, the study included metagenomic analysis of different organic manures used by farmers and gives an insight to the role the microbiome plays in plant growth. Using a formula of STCR-IPNS (soil test crop response integrated plant nutrition system), the quantities of different combinations of organic manures required to supply nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) to sunflower plants were calculated. Organic manure combinations using animal bone meal, neem cake, farmyard manure and vermicompost recorded better growth and yield responses in sunflower plants compared to inorganic chemical fertilizers. Based on the estimation of NPK in the individual manures and in the soil, pot experiments were carried out to understand the effect of organic manures as well as inorganic fertilizers in the vegetative and reproductive growth of sunflower.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 2","pages":"181-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143497257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ricardo A. Azevedo, Martin A. J. Parry, Alfred J. Keys, Ben J. Miflin, William J. Davies, Adam H. Price, Bertrand Hirel
Professor Peter John Lea (Figure 1), PhD, Emeritus Professor at Lancaster University, passed away on 16 June 2024. Tributes such as the one by Lancaster University (https://portal.lancaster.ac.uk/intranet/news/article/professor-peter-lea-phd-dsc-liverpool-fibiol), among others, have been paid to him soon after and an announcement was published on the website of Annals of Applied Biology (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17447348).
Peter was a highly esteemed colleague, former Annals Senior Editor, and a dear friend. He retired as Emeritus Professor of Lancaster University and was renowned not only in his field, but well beyond.
Peter Lea received his BSc, PhD and DSc from the University of Liverpool in the late 1960s. He was a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Botany and Microbiology at University College London from 1970 until 1973. Following this he worked for almost 12 years in the Biochemistry Department at Rothamsted Experimental Station, now Rothamsted Research (https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/). In 1985 he moved to Lancaster where he worked at Biological Sciences Department, now Lancaster Environmental Centre (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/—Figure 2), Lancaster University (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/), as Professor of Biology until his retirement over 20 years later. His main research interests have been the pathways and mechanisms by which plants are able to take up nitrogen and convert it to amino acids and proteins that are used as animal and human food.
Peter's work on nitrogen assimilation was extremely relevant to crop improvement and to the work on nitrogen metabolism ever since. The discovery of glutamate synthases (E.C. 1.4.1.13 and E.C. 1.4.7.1) caused a major re-assessment of the way in which ammonium is assimilated in bacteria and higher plants. Two key articles (Lea & Miflin, 1974; Miflin & Lea, 1976) published with his colleague Prof. Ben Miflin are classical citations. He has also contributed with a significant amount of important work to the advancement of plant stress responses to abiotic stresses (Gratão et al., 2005), amino acids metabolism (Azevedo et al., 1997) and photorespiration (Keys et al., 1978).
Peter was also heavily involved in numerous other activities and was a member of the Association of Applied Biologists (https://www.aab.org.uk/) as President Elect 2005–2006 and President 2007–2008. He was also an Annals of Applied Biology Senior Editor for Crop Improvement for almost 12 years. He was a mentor to many students, scientists and editors.
He published/edited dozens of books and book chapters and over 300 papers. He also left his mark publishing important papers in Annals such as “Asparagine in plants” (Lea et al., 2007), which is the 8th most cited paper of the journal in its 110 years.
Peter will be missed. We all worked together with
Peter John Lea教授(图1),兰开斯特大学名誉教授,于2024年6月16日逝世。不久之后,兰开斯特大学(https://portal.lancaster.ac.uk/intranet/news/article/professor-peter-lea-phd-dsc-liverpool-fibiol)等机构就向他表示了敬意,《应用生物学年鉴》的网站上也发表了一篇声明(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17447348).Peter),他是一位备受尊敬的同事,前《年鉴》高级编辑,也是一位亲爱的朋友。他以兰开斯特大学名誉教授的身份退休,不仅在他的领域享有盛誉,而且在其他领域也享有盛誉。Peter Lea于20世纪60年代末在利物浦大学获得学士学位、博士学位和理科硕士学位。1970年至1973年,他在伦敦大学学院植物与微生物系做博士后研究员。之后,他在洛桑试验站的生物化学系工作了近12年,现在是洛桑研究所(https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/)。1985年,他搬到兰开斯特,在兰开斯特大学(https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/)生物科学系,即现在的兰开斯特环境中心(https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/ -图2)工作,担任生物学教授,直到20多年后退休。他的主要研究兴趣是植物吸收氮并将其转化为氨基酸和蛋白质的途径和机制,这些氨基酸和蛋白质被用作动物和人类的食物。彼得在氮同化方面的研究与作物改良和氮代谢方面的研究息息相关。谷氨酸合成酶(E.C. 1.4.1.13和E.C. 1.4.7.1)的发现引起了对细菌和高等植物中铵的同化方式的重大重新评估。两篇关键文章(Lea &;Miflin, 1974;Miflin,Lea, 1976)与他的同事Ben Miflin教授发表的都是经典引文。他还在植物对非生物胁迫的胁迫反应(grat<e:1>等人,2005)、氨基酸代谢(Azevedo等人,1997)和光呼吸(Keys等人,1978)方面做出了大量重要贡献。彼得还积极参与许多其他活动,是应用生物学家协会(https://www.aab.org.uk/)的成员,2005-2006年当选主席,2007-2008年当选主席。他还曾担任《应用生物学年鉴》作物改良高级编辑近12年。他是许多学生、科学家和编辑的导师。他出版/编辑了数十本书籍和书籍章节,并发表了300多篇论文。他还在《年鉴》上发表了重要论文,如《植物中的天冬酰胺》(Lea et al., 2007),这篇论文是该杂志110年来被引用次数排名第8位的论文。我们会想念彼得的。我们都和他一起工作,虽然科学把我们团结在一起,但真正的友谊让我们在一起了几十年!一位杰出的科学家和人将被怀念。Peter是我在兰开斯特大学的博士生导师(1988-1992)。我也在他的实验室里作为博士后和他一起工作了一年多(1996-1997)。博士研究氨基酸代谢,博士后研究植物臭氧胁迫。在过去的三个月里,我与他的同事和女儿Julia Lea交换了很多关于Peter的信息。我重温了我们的工作,我们的旅行,我们的照片。当我第一次见到彼得时:1988年8月12日,一个晴朗的星期五傍晚,我到达兰开斯特。我只和他交换过几次传真信息(他在1988年1月12日,我的生日那天收我为博士生——这是一份多么好的礼物啊!)在兰开斯特大学接待处谈了5分钟后,彼得在弗内斯学院给我安排了一个房间,让我第二天周六中午12点在系里见他,讨论我的博士项目的想法,他还带我参观了系。星期天,他请我和他的妻子克里斯汀和女儿朱莉娅共进晚餐!周一上午9点,他让他的秘书帮我开了一个银行账户,由大学的住宿服务办公室为我安排了接下来四周的住宿,并从9月开始为我的家人安排了一套校园公寓。这是一段牢固的工作关系的开始,也是一段多年来不断发展的友谊。博士:我的课题是玉米的赖氨酸和苏氨酸代谢。我设法在不到4年的时间里完成了它,写论文,并帮助其他学生。论文答辩期间发生了一件奇怪的事情:上午9点开始,午餐时间只有1小时,下午5点20分左右结束。我的同事约翰·史密斯告诉我,彼得在部门里走来走去,想知道发生了什么事!持续时间不应超过2-3小时。但一切都很好,论文没有变化,两位成员都对工作非常满意。 论文发表后,他在我实验室的工作台上留下了一份《植物化学》杂志的硬拷贝,在论文的第一页上贴了一张黄色的贴纸,上面写着:“祝贺你,太棒了。”那是彼得!我把黄色贴纸放在家里一个安全的地方。如果我的文章过于私人,我很抱歉,但彼得是我的导师,我最好的朋友,我告诉我的学生们要学习的真正聪明的人和科学家的榜样。我记得当实验室里的每个人知道“Peter Lea教授要来皮拉西卡巴参观实验室”时,他们都很兴奋!彼得,感谢你让我和我的家人生活得更好,并与你、克里斯汀和朱莉娅一起度过了不可思议的36年。我对你的钦佩和尊敬是无法估量的。我第一次见到彼得是在洛桑研究所,当时我还是一名研究生,坦率地说,我觉得他的知识、无限的精力和热情有点吓人。他绝对是一个有竞争力的、比生活更重要的人物,他总是能把握住脉搏,甚至在每个人做自己之前就知道他们在做什么。多年来,我对Peter有了更深入的了解,我们合作了许多项目,他成为了我的密友和导师(图5)。Peter是一个很好的战略家,总是有一个计划,所以我们每次会议或讨论结束时都有行动点,这样每个人都清楚自己在做什么,怎么做,什么时候做。他要求很高,但真正关心和支持他的同事,并确保他们都得到应有的认可。当我成为《应用生物学年鉴》的EIC时,Peter是我第一个加入编委会的人,他在那里担任了多年的高级编辑,确保出版的作品是最高标准的,并帮助作者达到这种质量。我第一次见到彼得·李是在1973年。当时他和莱斯利·福登(Leslie Fowden)一起获得了皇家学会的皮克林奖学金,后者刚刚被任命为洛桑试验站主任。那年晚些时候,我担任了那里的生物化学系主任,彼得也加入了该系。彼得一直在研究非蛋白氨基酸和tRNA合酶的特异性。然而,不久之后,彼得和我开始了一项长期的合作,研究植物吸收氮的方式。彼得在利物浦和大卫·瑟曼一起完成了关于谷氨酸脱氢酶的博士学位他对谷氨酸脱氢酶在叶片氮同化中的作用并不感兴趣。我在哈里·比弗斯的实验室里度过了一个假期,分离和研究了根和茎质体中酶的分布。结果表明,GDH不是氮素同化的途径,但叶绿体中有大量的谷氨酰胺合成酶和将硝酸盐转化为谷氨酰胺的酶。在我休假之前,我在纽卡斯尔大学工作,与查理·布朗共用设备,他告诉我他发现了谷氨酸合酶(GOGAT)。彼得和我开始相信,如果我们能在植物尤其是叶绿体中证明这种酶可以解决这个问题。尝试使用先前的NADH或NADPH作为供体的检测失败。彼得想出了谷氨酸的色谱分析方法,我们决定用铁氧还蛋白作为供体。在那些日子里,这种物质无法从化学品供应商那里获得,但国王学院的大卫·霍尔好心地捐赠了一份供应,作为捐赠者,它催化了谷氨酰胺生产谷氨酸。五十年后,我们提出的植物氮同化的途径仍然成立。彼得总是对调查和回顾文献很感兴趣,这给了他一个广阔的视野,在引发讨论和提出解决任何问
{"title":"Professor Peter J. Lea: The man, the scientist","authors":"Ricardo A. Azevedo, Martin A. J. Parry, Alfred J. Keys, Ben J. Miflin, William J. Davies, Adam H. Price, Bertrand Hirel","doi":"10.1111/aab.12956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12956","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Professor Peter John Lea (Figure 1), PhD, Emeritus Professor at Lancaster University, passed away on 16 June 2024. Tributes such as the one by Lancaster University (https://portal.lancaster.ac.uk/intranet/news/article/professor-peter-lea-phd-dsc-liverpool-fibiol), among others, have been paid to him soon after and an announcement was published on the website of <i>Annals of Applied Biology</i> (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17447348).</p><p>Peter was a highly esteemed colleague, former <i>Annals</i> Senior Editor, and a dear friend. He retired as Emeritus Professor of Lancaster University and was renowned not only in his field, but well beyond.</p><p>Peter Lea received his BSc, PhD and DSc from the University of Liverpool in the late 1960s. He was a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Botany and Microbiology at University College London from 1970 until 1973. Following this he worked for almost 12 years in the Biochemistry Department at Rothamsted Experimental Station, now Rothamsted Research (https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/). In 1985 he moved to Lancaster where he worked at Biological Sciences Department, now Lancaster Environmental Centre (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/—Figure 2), Lancaster University (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/), as Professor of Biology until his retirement over 20 years later. His main research interests have been the pathways and mechanisms by which plants are able to take up nitrogen and convert it to amino acids and proteins that are used as animal and human food.</p><p>Peter's work on nitrogen assimilation was extremely relevant to crop improvement and to the work on nitrogen metabolism ever since. The discovery of glutamate synthases (E.C. 1.4.1.13 and E.C. 1.4.7.1) caused a major re-assessment of the way in which ammonium is assimilated in bacteria and higher plants. Two key articles (Lea & Miflin, <span>1974</span>; Miflin & Lea, <span>1976</span>) published with his colleague Prof. Ben Miflin are classical citations. He has also contributed with a significant amount of important work to the advancement of plant stress responses to abiotic stresses (Gratão et al., <span>2005</span>), amino acids metabolism (Azevedo et al., <span>1997</span>) and photorespiration (Keys et al., <span>1978</span>).</p><p>Peter was also heavily involved in numerous other activities and was a member of the Association of Applied Biologists (https://www.aab.org.uk/) as President Elect 2005–2006 and President 2007–2008. He was also an <i>Annals of Applied Biology</i> Senior Editor for Crop Improvement for almost 12 years. He was a mentor to many students, scientists and editors.</p><p>He published/edited dozens of books and book chapters and over 300 papers. He also left his mark publishing important papers in <i>Annals</i> such as “Asparagine in plants” (Lea et al., <span>2007</span>), which is the 8th most cited paper of the journal in its 110 years.</p><p>Peter will be missed. We all worked together with","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12956","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143114316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Prof. Fernanda Fidalgo, Associate Professor w/Habilitation at the Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Portugal, member of the GreenUPorto, and coordinator of the Plant Stress Lab.