Annals of surgery最新文献

Objective: To understand psychosocial functioning before and after gender-affirming facial feminization surgery (FFS) as well as identify predictors of postoperative psychosocial functioning.

Summary background data: Few investigations have rigorously explored the impact of gender-affirming FFS on psychosocial functioning in transgender and gender non-binary (TGNB) individuals. This knowledge gap hinders the identification of methods to optimize mental health quality-of-life outcomes after FFS and carries repercussions for access to care.

Methods: Adult TGNB participants awaiting gender-affirming FFS were prospectively enrolled and administered Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments assessing anxiety, anger, depression, global mental and physical health, positive affect, emotional support, social isolation, companionship, and meaning and purpose before and 3-6 months after FFS. Paired t-tests compared pre- and postoperative scores. Multivariable linear models identified predictors of postoperative psychosocial outcomes.

Results: Among the domains, psychosocial scores improved for anxiety, depression, global mental health, social isolation, and positive affect after FFS. When accounting for potential variables contributing to postoperative psychosocial scores including other gender-affirming surgeries, hormone therapy duration, and private versus public insurance type, we found that preoperative depression scores independently predicted the variance in all other postoperative scores with global mental health (β=-0.52, 95%CI -0.58--0.31 P<0.001), anxiety (β=0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.51, P<0.001), and meaning and purpose (β=-0.52, 95% CI -0.78--0.42 P<0.001) as the strongest models.

Conclusions: This study suggests that gender-affirming FFS improves psychosocial functioning; however, such improvements are highly influenced by the baseline psychological functioning of each individual. These findings indicate that preoperative psychological functioning may be a potential avenue for improving outcomes after FFS via perioperative psychological interventions.

Objective: In this study we analyzed the impact of centralization on key metrics, outcomes and patterns of care at the Irish National Center.

Summary background data: Overall survival rates in esophageal cancer in the West have doubled in the last 25 years. An international trend towards centralization may be relevant, however this model remains controversial with Ireland, centralizing esophageal cancer surgery in 2011.

Study design: All patients (n=1245) with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or junction treated with curative intent involving surgery, including endoscopic surgery, were included (n= 461 from 2000-2011, and 784 from 2012-2022). All data entry was prospectively recorded. Overall survival was measured (i) for the entire cohort; (ii) patients with locally advanced disease (cT2-3N0-3); and (iii) patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. All complications were recorded as per Esophageal Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) definitions, and the Clavien Dindo (CD) severity classification.

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (v.6.0) for Windows and SPSS (v.23.0) software (SPSS,Chicago,IL) RStudio (Rversion4.2.2). Survival times were calculated using log-rank test and a Cox-regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves generated.

Results: Endotherapy for cT1a/IMC adenocarcinoma increased from 40 (9% total) to 245 (31% total) procedures between the pre-centralization (pre-C) and post-centralization (post-C) periods. A significantly (P<0.001) higher proportion of patients with cT2-3N0-3 disease in the post-C period underwent neoadjuvant therapy (66% vs 53%). Operative mortality was lower (P=0.02) post-C, at 2% vs 4.5%, and>IIIa CD major complications decreased from 33% to 25% (P<0.01). Recurrence rates were lower post-C (38% vs 53%, P<0.01). Median overall survival was 73.83 versus 47.23 months in the 2012-22 and 2000-11 cohorts respectively (P<0.001). For those who received neoadjuvant therapy, the median survival was 28.5 months pre-C and 42.5 months post-C (P<0.001).

Conclusion: These data highlight improvements in both operative outcomes and survival from the time of centralization, and a major expansion of endoscopic surgery. Although not providing proof, the study suggests a positive impact of formal centralization with governance on key quality metrics, and an evolution in patterns of care.

Objectives: To externally validate the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) classification and test its performance for predicting clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CRPF) for periampullary tumours (P-amps).

Background: The ISGPS is a simple two-factor, four-tier classification of pancreas-related risk for CRPF after a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). External validation and performance of the classification specific to P-amps are lacking. P-amps have different disease biology, lesser need for neoadjuvant therapy, softer pancreas, and a higher rate of CRPF, underscoring the importance of site-specific prediction.

Methods: Validation was performed in a cohort of 1422 patients, with CRPF as the primary outcome. Model performance was tested by plotting the receiver operating curve and calibration plots. After analysing the factors predicting CRPF, the model was optimised for P-amps.

Results: CRPF rate was 22.2% (315/1422), for P-amps being 25.8%. The ISGPS model performed moderately (AUC=0.632, 95% CI 0.598-0.666, P<0.001), with worse performance for P-amps (AUC=0.605, 95% CI 0.566-0.645, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, soft pancreas (OR 1.689, 95% CI 1.136-2.512, P=0.010), body mass index ≥23 kg/m2 (OR 2.112, 95% CI 1.464-3.046, P<0.001) and pancreatic duct ≤3 mm (OR 2.113 95% CI 1.457-3.064, P<0.001), emerged as independent predictors and the model was optimised. The adjusted ISGPS for P-amps showed improved discrimination (AUC=0.672, P<0.001, 95% CI 0.637-0.707), with adequate performance on internal validation.

Conclusion: The adjusted ISPGS performs better than the original ISGPS in predicting CRPF for P-amps. Large-scale multicenter data is needed to generate and validate site-specific predictive models.

Objective: To compare the rates of unplanned procedures for access-sensitive surgical conditions among beneficiaries living in census tracts of varying social capital levels.

Background: Access-sensitive surgical conditions are conditions ideally screened for and treated in an elective setting. However, when left untreated, these conditions may result in unplanned (i.e., urgent or emergent) surgery. It is possible that social capital-the resources available to individuals through their membership in a social network-may impact the likelihood of a planned procedure occurring.

Methods: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent one of three access-sensitive procedures (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy for cancer, and ventral hernia repair) between 2016-2020 were stratified by their census tract level of social capital, the exposure variable. Outcomes included rate of unplanned surgery, readmission, 30-day mortality, and complications which were risk-adjusted with a logistic regression model that accounted for patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, and area deprivation.

Results: A total of 975,048 beneficiaries were included (mean [SD] patient age, 76 [7.6] years; 443,190 were male [45.45%]). Compared to patients from census tracts in the highest overall social capital decile, those from census tracts with the least social capital were on average more likely to undergo unplanned surgery (40.67% versus 35.28%, OR=1.26 P<0.001). Additionally, beneficiaries in these communities were also more likely to experience postoperative complications (24.99% versus 22.90%, OR=1.12 P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in rates of readmission or mortality. When evaluating only elective procedures, the differences between the lowest and highest social capital decile groups reduced significantly for complications (12.77% versus 12.11%, OR=1.06 P=0.04), the differences in mortality rates collapsed, and differences in readmission rates remained insignificant.

Conclusion: These data suggest that Medicare beneficiaries who live in communities with lower social capital are more likely to undergo unplanned surgery for access-sensitive conditions. Efforts to improve social capital in these communities may be one strategy for reducing the rate of unplanned operations.

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of marginal liver grafts based on the Eurotransplant extended donor criteria (ECD) criteria.

Summary background data: Eurotransplant uses a broad definition of ECD criteria (age >65 years, steatosis >40%, BMI >30 kg/m2, ICU stay >7 days, DCD, and certain laboratory parameters) for allocating organs to recipients who have consented to marginal grafts. Historically, marginal liver grafts were associated with increased rates of dysfunction.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis using the German Transplant Registry (GTR) and the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2006-2016. Results were validated with recent SRTR data (2017-2022). Donors were classified according to the Eurotransplant ECD criteria, DCD was excluded. Data were analyzed with cut-off prediction, binomial logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression.

Results: The study analyzed 92,330 deceased brain-dead donors (87% SRTR) and 70,374 transplants (87% SRTR) in adult recipients. Predominant ECD factors were donor age in Germany (30%) and BMI in the US (28%). Except for donor age, grafts meeting ECD criteria were not associated with impaired 1- or 3-year survival. Cut-offs had little to no predictive value for 30-day graft survival (AUROC 0.49 - 0.52) and were nominally higher for age (72 vs. 65 years) in Germany as compared to those defined by current Eurotransplant criteria.

Conclusions: The outcome of transplanted grafts from higher risk donors was nearly equal to standard donors with Eurotransplant criteria failing to predict survival of marginal grafts. Modifying ECD criteria could improve graft allocation and potentially expand the donor pool.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of indocyanine-green (ICG)-guided lymphography (ICG-Lg) in reducing the incidence of chyle leak (CL) after esophagectomy.

Background: Chylothorax may severely impact esophageal cancer surgery, and the pre-emptive ligation of the thoracic duct (TD) is the most widespread control of this complication. Intraoperative ICG-Lg has been recently embedded in minimally invasive esophagectomy to facilitate TD detection and pre-emptive ligation.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer at a tertiary referral center between January 2018 and August 2023. Patients were routinely submitted to extended lymphadenectomy with TD ligation and removal. All patients treated after January 2021 underwent ICG-Lg for TD identification and ligation (ICG group) and compared to the previous series (no-ICG group). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative CL, while univariate and backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify associated factors.

Results: After including 320 patients, 151 (ICG group) were submitted to ICG-Lg before the pre-emptive TD ligation. Both groups presented similar characteristics, except for neoadjuvant therapy (P=<0.001) and preoperative comorbidities (P=0.045). Intraoperative ICG-Lg significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative CL (11.8% vs 4.6%, P=0.026) and was significantly associated with shorter median length of hospital stay (13 vs 9 days, P=0.006). However, CL after ICG-Lg was more likely to require repairing reoperation (P=0.050).

Conclusions: Intraoperative ICG-Lg demonstrated significantly lower rates of CL after total minimally invasive esophagectomy and, therefore, it should be routinely embedded in the standardized surgical technique of high-volume centers for esophageal cancer.

Objective: To clarify the impact of the preoperative time intervals on short-term postoperative and pathological outcomes in esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy.

Summary background data: The impact of preoperative intervals on esophageal cancer patients who received multimodality treatment remains unknown.

Methods: Patients(cT1-4aN0-3M0) treated with nCRT plus esophagectomy were included using the Dutch national DUCA-database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effect of different time intervals upon short-term postoperative and pathological outcomes: diagnosis-to-nCRT intervals (≤5, 5-8 and 8-12 wk), nCRT-to-surgery intervals (5-11, 11-17 and >17 wk) and total preoperative intervals (≤16, 16-25 and >25 wk).

Results: Between 2010-2021, a total of 5052 patients were included. Compared to diagnosis-to-nCRT interval ≤5 weeks, the interval 8-12 weeks was associated with higher risk of overall complications (P=0.049). Compared to nCRT-to-surgery interval 5-11 weeks, the longer intervals (11-17 wk and >17 wk) were associated with higher risk of overall complications (P-value=0.016; P-value<0.001) and anastomotic leakage (P-value=0.004; P-value=0.030), but the interval >17 weeks was associated with lower risk of ypN+ (P-value=0.021). The longer total preoperative intervals were not associated with the risk of 30-day mortality and complications compared to the interval ≤16 weeks, but the longer total preoperative interval (>25 wk) was associated with higher ypT stage (P-value=0.010) and lower pCR rate (P-value=0.013).

Conclusion: In patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT and esophagectomy, prolonged preoperative time intervals may lead to higher morbidity and disease progression, and the causal relationship requires further confirmation.

Objective: To define the concept of surgeon-scientists and identify the root causes of their decline in number and impact. The secondary aim was to provide actionable remedies.

Background: Surgeons who conduct research in addition to patient care are referred to as «surgeon-scientists». While their value to society remains undisputed, their numbers and associated impact have been plunging. While reasons have been well identified along with proposals for countermeasures, their application have largely failed.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review covering all aspects of surgeon-scientists together with a global online survey among 141 young academic surgeons. Using gap analysis, we determined implementation gaps for proposed measures. Then, we developed a comprehensive rescue package.

Results: A surgeon-scientist must actively and continuously engage in both patient care and research. Competence in either field must be established through protected training and criteria of excellence, particularly reflecting contribution to innovation. The decline of surgeon-scientists has reached unprecedented magnitude. Leadership turning hospitals into «profit-factories» is one reason, a flawed selection process not exclusively based on excellence another. Most importantly, the appreciation for the academic mission has vanished. Along with fundamentally addressing these root causes, surgeon-scientists' path to excellence must be streamlined, and their continuous devotion for innovation cherished.

Conclusion: The journey of the surgeon-scientist is at crossroads. As society, we either adapt and shift our priorities again towards innovation or capitulate to the greed for profit, permanently losing these invaluable professionals. Successful rescue packages must not only involve hospitals and universities but also the political sphere.

Objective: The aim of this study was a prospective validation of the recently established ISGPS pancreas classification as a parenchymal risk classification system for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Summary background data: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the major driver for complications after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) published a pancreas classification containing the parameters main pancreatic duct diameter (MPD) and pancreatic texture to help assess the risk of POPF development following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods: From January 2020 to July 2021, 271 patients receiving elective PD were included after informed consent. The postoperative course was documented prospectively up to postoperative day 30. Among the pancreas characteristics, MPD and pancreatic texture were assessed intraoperatively at the pancreatic resection margin and the pancreatic glands were assigned to one of the four pancreas classes according to the ISGPS (A to D). The primary endpoint was POPF according to the updated ISGPS definition. Secondary endpoints comprised other post-PD morbidity and mortality.

Results: Of 271 patients, 264 had available data according to the ISGPS pancreas classification. Of those, 78 were assigned to class A (30%), 53 to class B (20%), 50 to class C (19%) and 83 to class D (31%). POPF occurred in 54 of 271 patients (19.9%). The 30-day mortality was 7/271 (2.6%), with 6/7 having developed POPF (86%). POPF rates within the classes A, B, C and D were 9.0%, 11.3%, 20.0% and 37.4%, respectively (P<0.001). In the univariable regression analysis, only patients in pancreas class D demonstrated a significantly higher risk for POPF when compared to class A (OR 6.05, 95%-CI: 2.6-15.9, P<0.001). In the multivariable regression model, patients in class D had a significantly higher risk for POPF compared to class A (OR 3.45, 95%-CI: 1.15-11.3, P=0.032). The model comprised Body Mass Index, surgery duration, microscopic fibrosis and the ISGPS pancreas classification, demonstrating an AUC-value of approximately 0.82 when tested on the PARIS dataset.

Conclusion: This prospective trial shows that the ISGPS pancreas classification is valid. Patients in risk class D are prone to POPF independently of other factors. Therefore, all future publications on pancreatic surgery should report the risk class according to the ISGPS pancreas classification to allow for a better comparison of reported cohorts.

Background: The BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training.

Methods: It was organized into subcommittees, each of which was asked to prepare a manuscript on their findings and recommendations. The BRC II Subcommittees were: Blue Ribbon Committee 1 Review and Assessment; Surgical Workforce; Medical Student Education; Work Life Integration; Resident Education; Goals, Structure and Financing of Training; Education Support and Faculty Development; Research Training; Educational Technology and Assessment. BRC II used the Delphi approach with consensus defined as equal to or greater than 80% and identified and recommended 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024.

Results: The initial findings were presented to a general surgery and related specialty resident and fellow focus group for comments and written feedback, and they were asked to prepare a manuscript as well.

Conclusions: The reports of the Subcommittees of the BRC II provide an assessment and key recommendations concerning surgical education and training in 2024.