Annals of cardiothoracic surgery最新文献

Background: Several conduit configurations, such as straight graft (SG), Valsalva graft (VG), anticommissural plication (ACP), and the Stanford modification (SMOD) technique, have been described for the valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedure. Prior ex vivo studies have evaluated the impact of conduit configurations on root biomechanics, but the mock coronary artery circuits used could not replicate the physical properties of native coronary arteries. Moreover, the individual leaflet's biomechanics, including the fluttering phenomenon, were unclear.

Methods: Porcine aortic roots with coronary arteries were explanted (n=5) and underwent VSARR using SG, VG, ACP, and SMOD for evaluation in an ex vivo left heart flow loop simulator. Additionally, 762 patients who underwent VSARR from 1993 through 2022 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis of variance was performed to evaluate differences between different conduit configurations, with post hoc Tukey's correction for pairwise testing.

Results: SG demonstrated lower rapid leaflet opening velocity compared with VG (P=0.001) and SMOD (P=0.045) in the left coronary cusp (LCC), lower rapid leaflet closing velocity compared with VG (P=0.04) in the right coronary cusp (RCC), and lower relative opening force compared with ACP (P=0.04) in the RCC. The flutter frequency was lower in baseline compared with VG (P=0.02) and in VG compared with ACP (P=0.03) in the LCC. Left coronary artery mean flow was higher in SG compared with SMOD (P=0.02) and ACP (P=0.05). Clinically, operations using SG compared with sinus-containing graft was associated with shorter aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time (P<0.001, <0.001).

Conclusions: SG demonstrated hemodynamics and biomechanics most closely recapitulating those from the native root with significantly shorter intraoperative times compared with repair using sinus-containing graft. Future in vivo validation studies as well as correlation with comprehensive, comparative clinical study outcomes may provide additional invaluable insights regarding strategies to further enhance repair durability.

Background: The Ross procedure has demonstrated excellent long-term results, with restoration of life-expectancy in patients with severe aortic valve dysfunction. However, reintervention after Ross can occur, and herein we describe our center's experience with redo surgery after previous Ross procedures.

Methods: We searched our prospective database for aortic valve-repair and recruited all adult (≥18 years) patients who have undergone valve-sparing root replacements (VSRRs) and/or aortic valve-repair after Ross procedure between July 2001 and July 2022. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables affecting early mortality. Survival, freedom-from-valve-reintervention and freedom-from-aortic regurgitation (AR) grade ≥3 were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 63 patients were recruited for this study. Indication for reoperation after Ross was aortic aneurysm without AR in 17 (27%), aortic aneurysm with AR in 27 (43%), and isolated AR in 19 (30%) patients. Median follow-up time was 7.82 years. The majority of patients (76%) had undergone the free root technique during their index Ross operation. Cumulative survival, after redo surgery following Ross, was 98.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.3-99.8%] at 1 year, 96.3% (95% CI: 88.2-98.3%) at 5 years, and 92.4% (95% CI: 87.1-98.0%) at 10 years. Freedom-from-reoperation on the aortic valve at 1 year was 98.4% (95% CI: 97.0-99.8%), at 5 years was 96.7% (95% CI: 87.6-99.0%), and 79.7% (95% CI: 71.1-88.3%) at 10 years.

Conclusions: Long-term survival after redo surgery following the Ross operation is excellent. The data support our aggressive valve-sparing approach after Ross.

Aortic root remodeling was originally designed in the late 1980s to treat patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs), aortic regurgitation (AR), and root aneurysm to normalize root dimensions. The late results showed a relevant proportion of patients who required reoperation for recurrent AR. Later observations revealed that cusp prolapse is frequently present after correction of root dilatation. We showed that such prolapse could be detected by measuring effective height (eH) and corrected by concomitant cusp repair. In the past 13 years, we have added a suture annuloplasty to improve aortic valve function further. The operation starts with ascertaining adequate cusp size by measuring geometric cusp height. The dilated aortic wall is resected, and a Dacron graft is tailored to create three tongues. These tongues are sutured to the cusp insertion lines. Starting the suture in the nadir allows for easy extension of tongue length to avoid commissural height restriction. A suture annuloplasty is added at nadir level and tied around a Hegar dilator to normalize annular diameter. The valve is assessed visually and by measuring eH. Cusp prolapse (eH <9 mm) is frequent and corrected by free margin plication until all free margins are at equal level and eH is 9 mm. We have employed root remodeling in more than 710 instances of root aneurysm and TAVs. Mean myocardial ischemic time has been 65±13 minutes for isolated remodeling, operative mortality has been 1.5% for elective procedures. With suture annuloplasty, 10-year freedom from reoperation is 95%, even without suture annuloplasty 20-year freedom from reoperation is 85%. In our experience, root remodeling has been a valid form of valve-preserving surgery with low morbidity and mortality and excellent long-term results.