Annals of cardiothoracic surgery最新文献

The aortic valve (AV) is a three-dimensional structure, with leaflets that are suspended within the functional aortic annulus (FAA). These structures (AV and FAA) are therefore intrinsically connected and disease of just one component can independently lead to AV dysfunction. Hence, AV dysfunction can occur in the setting of entirely normal valve leaflets. However, as these structures are functionally inter-connected, disease of one component can lead to abnormalities of the other over time. Thus, AV dysfunction is often multifactorial. Valve-sparing root procedures require an in-depth understanding of these inter-relationships, and herein we are providing a detailed account of some of the most pertinent anatomical relationships.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.21037/acs-2022-urats-157.].

The first valve sparing root replacement (VSRR) was first described over thirty years ago. Reimplantation is favored at our institution to provide maximum annular support in the setting of annuloaortic ectasia. Multiple iterations for this operation have been reported. Surgical intervention varies in terms of graft sizing, the number and method of inflow suture placement, strategy for annular plication and stabilization, and finally choice of graft type. Our specific technique has evolved over the last eighteen years and the current approach is to use a larger straight graft loosely based on the original Feindel-David formula, six inflow sutures to anchor the graft, and some degree of annular plication with annular stabilization. The long-term results for both trileaflet and bicuspid valves are associated with a low reintervention rate. Herein we provide a clear outline for our specific approach to the reimplantation technique.

Owing to its excellent long-term results, aortic valve-sparing surgery is increasingly used in patients with aortic regurgitation and/or ascending aortic aneurysm. Moreover, in patients with a bicuspid valve who meet the criteria for replacement of the aortic sinuses or aortic regurgitation surgery, valve-sparing surgery may be considered if performed at a comprehensive valve center (Class 2b indication in both the American and European guidelines). Reconstructive valve surgery aims at restoring a normal aortic valve function and a normal aortic root shape as well. Echocardiography plays a central role in defining abnormal valve morphologies, in quantifying aortic regurgitation and mechanisms, and in appreciating tissue valve quality and surgical results. Therefore, despite the emergence of other tomographic techniques, 2D and 3D echocardiography represents the cornerstone for patient selection and prediction of the probability of a reliable repair. The present review focuses on echocardiographic evaluation to detect aortic valve and aortic root abnormalities, to quantify aortic valve regurgitation, to predict aortic valve reparability, and to assess immediate postoperative results in the operating room. Echocardiographic predictors of successful valve and root repair are presented in a practical way.

Background: Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm. The objective of this review was to summarize our experience with root remodeling encompassing 28 years.

Methods: We performed root remodeling in 1,189 patients (76% male, mean age 53±14 years) between October 1995 and September 2022. The original valve morphology was unicuspid in 33 (2%), bicuspid in 472 (40%) and tricuspid in 684 (58%) patients. Fifty-four patients (5%) had Marfan's syndrome. Objective measurement of valve configuration was performed in 804 (77%) and an external suture annuloplasty was added in 524 patients (44%). Cusp repair was performed in 1,047 (88%) patients, most commonly for prolapse (n=972; 82%). Mean follow-up was 6.7±5.5 years [1 month to 28 years]. Follow-up was 95% complete (7,700 patient-years).

Results: Survival was 71% at 20 years; freedom from cardiac death was 80%. Freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥2 was 77% at 15 years. Freedom from reoperation was 89% and was higher in tricuspid aortic valves (94%) compared to bicuspid (84%) and unicuspid valves (P<0.001). Since the introduction of effective height measurement, freedom from reoperation has remained stable at 15 years (91%). With the addition of a suture annuloplasty, freedom from reoperation was 94% at 12 years. The difference with or without annuloplasty (91%) was not significant (P=0.949).

Conclusions: Root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. Concomitant cusp prolapse is frequent and can be corrected reproducibly by intraoperative measurement of effective height. The long-term benefit of an annuloplasty still needs to be defined.