Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1007/s11270-024-07288-x
Hannah Binner, Piotr Wojda, Felipe Yunta, Timo Breure, Andrea Schievano, Emanuele Massaro, Arwyn Jones, Jennifer Newell, Remigio Paradelo, Iustina Popescu Boajă, Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė, Teresa Tuttolomondo, Nicolò Iacuzzi, Giulia Bondi, Vesna Zupanc, Laure Mamy, Lorenza Pacini, Mauro De Feudis, Valeria Cardelli, Alicja Kicińska, Michael J. Stock, Hongdou Liu, Erdona Demiraj, Calogero Schillaci
There is an urgent need by the European Union to establish baseline levels for many widespread pollutants and to set out specific levels for these under the Zero pollution action plan. To date, few systematic reviews, superseded by bibliometric analyses, have explored this issue. Even less research has been carried out to compare the efficacy of these two data extraction approaches. This study aims to address these two issues by i) constructing an inventory of the available information on urban soils, highlighting evidence gaps and measuring compliance with the Zero pollution action plan, and by ii) comparing the methods and results of these two data extraction approaches. Through Scopus and Web of Science databases, peer-reviewed articles using the terms urban soil in combination with specific urban soil threats and/or challenges were included. Notably, both approaches retrieved a similar number of initial articles overall, while the bibliometric analysis removed fewer duplicates and excluded fewer articles overall, leaving the total number of articles included in each approach as: 603 articles in the systematic review and 2372 articles in the bibliometric analysis. Nevertheless, both approaches identified the two main urban soil threats and/or challenges to be linked to soil organic carbon and/or heavy metals. This study gives timely input into the Zero pollution action plan and makes recommendations to stakeholders within the urban context.
欧盟迫切需要为许多广泛存在的污染物确定基准水平,并根据零污染行动计划为这些污染物设定具体水平。迄今为止,对这一问题进行探讨的系统综述很少,取而代之的是文献计量分析。对这两种数据提取方法的有效性进行比较的研究更是少之又少。本研究旨在通过以下方式解决这两个问题:i) 建立城市土壤可用信息清单,突出证据差距并衡量零污染行动计划的遵守情况;ii) 比较这两种数据提取方法的方法和结果。通过 Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,收录了使用城市土壤和特定城市土壤威胁和/或挑战等术语的同行评审文章。值得注意的是,这两种方法检索到的初始文章数量总体上相似,而文献计量分析法删除的重复文章较少,排除的文章总体上也较少,因此每种方法纳入的文章总数均为系统综述的文章数量为 603 篇,文献计量分析的文章数量为 2372 篇。尽管如此,两种方法都确定了城市土壤的两大威胁和/或挑战与土壤有机碳和/或重金属有关。这项研究为 "零污染行动计划 "提供了及时的信息,并向城市中的利益相关者提出了建议。
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Characterization of the Major and Most Studied Urban Soil Threats in the European Union","authors":"Hannah Binner, Piotr Wojda, Felipe Yunta, Timo Breure, Andrea Schievano, Emanuele Massaro, Arwyn Jones, Jennifer Newell, Remigio Paradelo, Iustina Popescu Boajă, Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė, Teresa Tuttolomondo, Nicolò Iacuzzi, Giulia Bondi, Vesna Zupanc, Laure Mamy, Lorenza Pacini, Mauro De Feudis, Valeria Cardelli, Alicja Kicińska, Michael J. Stock, Hongdou Liu, Erdona Demiraj, Calogero Schillaci","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07288-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07288-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is an urgent need by the European Union to establish baseline levels for many widespread pollutants and to set out specific levels for these under the Zero pollution action plan. To date, few systematic reviews, superseded by bibliometric analyses, have explored this issue. Even less research has been carried out to compare the efficacy of these two data extraction approaches. This study aims to address these two issues by i) constructing an inventory of the available information on urban soils, highlighting evidence gaps and measuring compliance with the Zero pollution action plan, and by ii) comparing the methods and results of these two data extraction approaches. Through Scopus and Web of Science databases, peer-reviewed articles using the terms urban soil in combination with specific urban soil threats and/or challenges were included. Notably, both approaches retrieved a similar number of initial articles overall, while the bibliometric analysis removed fewer duplicates and excluded fewer articles overall, leaving the total number of articles included in each approach as: 603 articles in the systematic review and 2372 articles in the bibliometric analysis. Nevertheless, both approaches identified the two main urban soil threats and/or challenges to be linked to soil organic carbon and/or heavy metals. This study gives timely input into the Zero pollution action plan and makes recommendations to stakeholders within the urban context.</p>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.52,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1007/s11270-024-07275-2
Maidul I. Choudhury, Mikk Espenberg, Marc M. Hauber, Kuno Kasak, Samuel Hylander
Constructed wetlands and constructed floating wetlands are widely used for nitrogen (N) removal from surface water to combat eutrophication in freshwaters. Two main N removal pathways in freshwaters are plant biomass N uptake and denitrification, i.e. transformation of nitrate (NO3-) to nitrous oxide (N2O) or nitrogen gas (N2) by different microbes possessing nirK, nirS, nosZI, and nosZII genes. In this study, we tested woodchips-based floating beds (WFBs) as a nature-based and environment-friendly method to remove nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) from water. Moreover, we tested whether WFBs could support the growth of three selected plant species and the abundance of microbes on plant roots and woodchips as a proxy for WFBs’ denitrification potential. We conducted a greenhouse experiment for 90 days and measured NO3-N removal rates from water in WFBs mesocosms during five sampling occasions. Plant biomass production, biomass N uptake, and plant morphology related to N uptake and abundance of denitrifying organisms were measured at the end of the experiment. NO3-N removal rates were 29.17 ± 11.07, 28.18 ± 12.62, 25.28 ± 9.90, and 22.16 ± 7.79 mg L–1 d–1 m–2 (mean ± standard deviation) in Glyceria maxima, Juncus effusus, Filipendula ulmaria, and unplanted WFBs treatments, respectively for whole experimental period. N content in above- and belowground biomass of studied species ranged between 0.98 – 1.15 and 1.09 – 1.28 (% dry weight), respectively. Plant relative biomass production was 215 ± 61, 67 ± 18, and 7 ± 17 (% dry weight) for G. maxima, J. effusus and F. ulmaria, respectively. Denitrifiers were detected both on plant roots and woodchips, indicating WFBs’ denitrification potential. Our study highlights that WFBs could be applied to enhance NO3-N removal from surface water through plant biomass uptake and denitrification processes. Future studies should consider the long-term in situ application of WFBs for NO3-N removal from water.
{"title":"Application of Floating Beds Constructed with Woodchips for Nitrate Removal and Plant Growth in Wetlands","authors":"Maidul I. Choudhury, Mikk Espenberg, Marc M. Hauber, Kuno Kasak, Samuel Hylander","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07275-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07275-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Constructed wetlands and constructed floating wetlands are widely used for nitrogen (N) removal from surface water to combat eutrophication in freshwaters. Two main N removal pathways in freshwaters are plant biomass N uptake and denitrification, i.e. transformation of nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>-) to nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) or nitrogen gas (N<sub>2</sub>) by different microbes possessing <i>nirK</i>, <i>nirS</i>, <i>nosZI,</i> and n<i>osZII</i> genes. In this study, we tested woodchips-based floating beds (WFBs) as a nature-based and environment-friendly method to remove nitrate-nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) from water. Moreover, we tested whether WFBs could support the growth of three selected plant species and the abundance of microbes on plant roots and woodchips as a proxy for WFBs’ denitrification potential. We conducted a greenhouse experiment for 90 days and measured NO<sub>3</sub>-N removal rates from water in WFBs mesocosms during five sampling occasions. Plant biomass production, biomass N uptake, and plant morphology related to N uptake and abundance of denitrifying organisms were measured at the end of the experiment. NO<sub>3</sub>-N removal rates were 29.17 ± 11.07, 28.18 ± 12.62, 25.28 ± 9.90, and 22.16 ± 7.79 mg L<sup>–1</sup> d<sup>–1</sup> m<sup>–2</sup> (mean ± standard deviation) in <i>Glyceria maxima</i>, <i>Juncus effusus</i>, <i>Filipendula ulmaria,</i> and unplanted WFBs treatments, respectively for whole experimental period. N content in above- and belowground biomass of studied species ranged between 0.98 – 1.15 and 1.09 – 1.28 (% dry weight), respectively. Plant relative biomass production was 215 ± 61, 67 ± 18, and 7 ± 17 (% dry weight) for <i>G. maxima</i>, <i>J. effusus</i> and <i>F. ulmaria</i>, respectively. Denitrifiers were detected both on plant roots and woodchips, indicating WFBs’ denitrification potential. Our study highlights that WFBs could be applied to enhance NO<sub>3</sub>-N removal from surface water through plant biomass uptake and denitrification processes. Future studies should consider the long-term in situ application of WFBs for NO<sub>3</sub>-N removal from water.</p>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.52,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectual prevention and control of microplastics (MPs) in an environment is of great significance and a challenging task. The extensive usage and improper disposal of plastic materials increased the quantity of MPs in the surroundings, which poses potential issues for both flora and fauna. A recent survey reported that MPs can easily accumulate in human and animal bodies, which causes several adverse health problems such as inflammation, chronic disease, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, etc. MPs can also disturb the growth, reproduction, and survival of aquatic organisms, leading to a disruption of the food chain and ecosystem. Moreover, it acts as a toxin carrier and transports them into the biological system, leading to the accumulation of toxic compounds in the food chain that cause biomagnification. Therefore, effective MPs management is crucial to prevent and control the release of MPs into the environment. Strategies such as the 3R principle, public awareness, employing suitable solid waste management, and developing biodegradable alternatives to plastics can partially alleviate the hostile effect of MPs on the environment. However, this kind of strategy has not met the present-day demand to reduce waste MPs completely. In the future, available techniques like membrane filters, ultrasound, electrocoagulation, magnetic separation etc. must be combined with advanced technology like machine learning and artificial intelligence (MLAI) for the best performance to remove MPs. This review provides a source for further improvement for the effective prevention and control of waste MPs generation in an environment for sustainability, which can likely be achieved using appropriate technology.