Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology最新文献

Objective: Explore the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) scores from the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests (cANT, cVNT) as embedded validity indicators (EVIs).

Method: A retrospective design of 98 consecutively referred youth aged 6-15 years (M = 11.28, SD = 2.80) that completed neuropsychological evaluation at a tertiary-care academic medical center.

Results: Invalid performance (i.e., ≥2 failed PVTs) occurred in 12.2% of the sample, with base rates of failure on individual PVTs ranging from 1.0% to 30.6%. Area under the curve (AUC) showed statistical significance for the auditory (AUC = 0.811, p = .004) but not the visual TOT. Logistic regression indicated the combination of both TOT scores with other PVTs increased correct identification of invalid performance to 85.7% versus 75% without TOT scores.

Conclusion: The utility of the TOT as a language-based EVI is one of many potential advantages of the cANT and cVNT compared to other confrontation naming tests. To confirm this, future studies with more diverse populations are warranted.

Objective: Within a sample of young athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), to explore the frequency of disclosed and nondisclosed concussions, identify reasons the youth did not report a suspected concussion, and learn the frequency that the youth still practiced or played in a game after a suspected concussion.

Method: Cross-sectional surveys were completed by 448 youth athletes (ages 8-14 years) and a corresponding parent (or caregiver). As part of larger respective surveys, questions regarding ADHD status and concussion history were asked of the youth and parents. Data regarding 40 youth with ADHD were available for analyses. Due to the low frequency of concussive injuries within the total sample, descriptive statistics and qualitative techniques were used to contextualize the data.

Results: The youth with ADHD were not more likely to experience at least one diagnosed concussion or nondisclosed concussion as compared to non-ADHD controls. Three of 40 youth athletes with ADHD (8%) had been diagnosed with a concussion, whereas 5 (13%) self-reported a nondisclosed concussion. Not wanting to lose playing time and not wanting to miss a game were the two most endorsed reasons for concussion nondisclosure.

Conclusions: More research is needed to understand the present results considering other research that puts similarly aged athletes with ADHD at greater risk for concussion. Education for youth with ADHD might help reduce the number of nondisclosed concussions that have a more complex recovery trajectory in this population.

Objective: Develop and preliminarily validate recognition subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).

Method: 49 older adults with no cognitive impairment were compared to 53 individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder (e.g., dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and traumatic brain injury) and 22 individuals with a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression and anxiety) on three recognition subtests (list, story, and figure) for Form B of the RBANS in this observational study.

Results: The individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder performed significantly poorer on most of the recognition scores compared to those with no cognitive impairment and those with a primary psychiatric disorder, with these latter two groups being largely comparable. In the entire sample, for the recognition subtests, education only correlated with figure recognition scores, and neither age nor gender influenced recognition scores. The RBANS indexes correlated with most of the recognition scores in the expected directions.

Conclusions: The group differences in performance on these recognition subtests preliminarily validate these scores on Form B, which were not previously available. Furthermore, these scores tended to not be influenced by age, education, or gender, although they were related to overall cognitive functioning. Additional validation is needed in larger, better clinically-defined, and more diverse samples. Nonetheless, these findings support the inclusion of the newly-developed Form B recognition subtests in future clinical practice and research settings to enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment recommendations.

Objective: To critically examine the assumption that protective orders are adequately protective of sensitive psychological/neuropsychological test information. Attorneys at times claim that to adequately cross-examine neuropsychological experts, they require direct access to protected test information, rather than having test data analyzed by retained neuropsychological experts. As a compromise, judges sometimes order that protected test information be released to attorneys under a protective order.

Method: An appointed writing group of forensic experts developed a position paper addressing the history of protective orders and their presumed effectiveness in protecting psychological and neuropsychological test content. The expert panel consisted of 12 forensic neuropsychologists, a forensic neuropsychologist/attorney, and a forensic psychologist/attorney.

Results: Eight reasons are enumerated as to why protective orders do not sufficiently safeguard protected psychological/neuropsychological information and thereby jeopardize future use of the tests. Recommendations are provided to the expert witness practitioner for navigating demands by non-psychologists for direct access to protected test information.

Conclusions: There is strong agreement within the practicing neuropsychology community that test security is a vital matter, which, if properly enforced, can ensure the validity of present and future psychological and neuropsychological assessments but, if ineffectively managed, will undermine such evaluations. Because the effectiveness of protective orders has not been, and cannot be, guaranteed, protected psychological and neuropsychological test information should not be released under a protective order.

Objective: Classifications such as Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia (CIND) are thought to represent the transitory, pre-clinical phase of dementia. However, increasing research demonstrates that CIND represents a nonlinear, unstable entity that does not always lead to imminent dementia. The present study utilizes a longitudinal repeated measures design to gain a thorough understanding of CIND classification stability patterns and identify predictors of future stability. The objectives were to i) explore patterns of longitudinal stability in cognitive status across multiple assessments and ii) investigate whether select baseline variables could predict 6-year CIND stability patterns.

Method: Participants (N = 259) included older adults (aged 65-90 years) from Project MIND, a six-year longitudinal repeated measures design in which participants were classified as either normal cognition (NC) or CIND at each annual assessment. A latent transition analysis approach was adapted in order to identify and characterize transitions in CIND status across annual assessments. Participants were classified as either Stable NC, Stable CIND, Progressers, Reverters, or Fluctuaters. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to test whether baseline predictors were associated with cognitive status stability patterns.

Results: The sample demonstrated high rates of reversion and fluctuation in CIND status across annual assessments. Additionally, premorbid IQ and CIND severity (i.e., single vs. multi-domain impairment) at baseline were significantly associated with select stability outcomes.

Conclusions: CIND status was unstable for several years following baseline assessment and cognitive reserve may delay or protect against demonstrable cognitive impairment. Further, consideration of cognitive impairment severity at the time of initial classification may improve CIND classifications.

Objective: To meet the growing demand for timely diagnosis in the new era of disease-modifying medications for Alzheimer's disease (AD), the present study aimed to reduce clinic wait times by developing and refining an abbreviated neuropsychological battery to assess individuals with a suspected amnestic process (i.e., Early-Stage AD Pathway).

Method: Early-Stage AD Pathway patients were referred by an internal neurology provider who determined that the patient had: (1) an amnestic clinical presentation, (2) a normal neurological examination, and (3) a Montreal Cognitive Assessment total score between 18 and 25. These patients were scheduled for a 2-h neuropsychological evaluation, including a brief clinical interview and an abbreviated testing battery. We evaluated n = 19 patients in the Early-Stage AD Pathway and compared them to 114 older adults referred via traditional clinic procedures (i.e., General Clinic).

Results: Most individuals evaluated via the Early-Stage AD Pathway were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; 68.4%) or mild dementia (21.1%) through the neuropsychological evaluation. Rate of diagnosis of MCI/dementia was comparable between groups. The average number of days between initial referral and completion of the neuropsychological evaluation was significantly lower (Mdiff = 145.8 days, U = 1867.500, p < 0.001) for the Early-Stage AD Pathway group than for the General Clinic group, as the former could be scheduled more flexibly.

Conclusions: Implementing an abbreviated neuropsychological assessment process significantly reduced the time between referral and evaluation to identify individuals who may be eligible for emerging pharmacological treatments for AD and/or non-pharmacological interventions in a timely manner.

Objective: Technology can be combined with psychological interventions to support older adults with memory concerns. Using a bi-phasic design, cognitive rehabilitation (CR) was integrated with off-the-shelf technology and delivered to two people with cognitive impairment, and one care partner.

Method: Pre- and post-intervention assessments were completed for all participants. Individuals with memory problems received pre- and post-intervention remote neuropsychological assessment (i.e., Rey auditory verbal learning test; mental alternations test; animal fluency), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). The care partner completed the HADS, Zarit burden interview, and neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire. Change metrics incorporated reliable change indices where possible. Goals were tracked using the Canadian occupation performance measure; these data were analyzed through visual inspection. A research journal (used to document intervention process) was analyzed thematically.

Results: Results cautiously suggested our integration was feasible and acceptable across several technologies and varying goals. Across participants, significant changes in goal progress suggested the integration of technology with CR successfully facilitated goal performance and satisfaction. The research journal underscored the importance of a visual component, intervention flexibility, and a strong therapeutic alliance in integrating technology and CR.

Conclusions: CR and technology present a promising avenue for supporting people living with cognitive impairment. Further exploration of technology and CR with a range of etiologies and target goals is warranted.

Objective: To examine correlates of the discrepancy between subjective cognitive complaints and processing speed performance in a sample of military personnel with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method: About 235 U.S. military service members (31 noninjured controls [NIC], 69 injured controls [IC], 70 uncomplicated mild TBI [mTBI], and 65 complicated mild/moderate/severe TBI [sTBI]) prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal TBI study completed neuropsychological testing, performance validity tests, and self-report measures of cognitive complaints and psychological symptoms. Service members were categorized as "Accurate Estimators," "Underestimators," and "Overestimators" based on discrepancies between their subjective cognition and processing speed performance.

Results: The NIC group was less likely to underestimate their cognitive abilities than the mTBI group (p < .05). Discrepancy groups significantly differed in processing speed scores (p < .001), with underestimators demonstrating the best objective cognitive performance. Spearman correlations revealed significant positive correlations between unadjusted discrepancy scores and psychological symptoms in the NIC, IC, and sTBI groups (ps < 0.05) but not the mTBI group (ps > 0.05). In contrast, discrepancy scores adjusted for premorbid intelligence were consistently and positively correlated with psychological symptoms across all injury groups (ps < 0.05).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that mTBI injuries may increase the likelihood of a patient underestimating their cognitive performance. Further, premorbid cognitive functioning is an important factor in evaluating discrepancies in self-reported cognitive complaints and processing speed performance.

Objective: The influence of depression on the relationship between cognition and daily living in aging Mexican American adults requires further investigation, given projected trends in general growth as well as prevalence of depression and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in this population.

Method: In the present study, we examined the extent to which depression (assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale - 15 item version) moderated the association between reported daily functioning (assessed using the Functional Activities Questionnaire [FAQ]) and objective neuropsychological performance in aging Mexican American adults in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort.

Results: Worse reported daily functioning (higher FAQ scores) was associated with worse memory and language performance among participants without elevated depression symptoms (ps < .05), but no associations were observed among those with elevated symptoms (ps > .05). Moreover, depression did not moderate associations of reported daily functioning with performance in attention and working memory or executive functioning and processing speed (ps > .05).

Conclusions: Aging Mexican American adults with elevated depression symptoms may have subjective informant reports of daily functioning that are discrepant from their objective performance on formal tests of memory and language. Within the context of neuropsychological evaluations for ADRD, failure to adequately assess mood to inform the nature of cognitive and/or functional changes could result in misdiagnosis and lead to delayed, premature, and/or improper intervention with this population.