Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition最新文献

Objectives: Little is known about decision regret following extremely premature birth. We assessed decision regret in women who delivered an extremely premature infant, comparing decision regret scores based on resuscitation decision.

Methods: Electronic survey assessment of decision regret using a validated tool included women who delivered at 22-25 completed weeks of gestation at two hospitals 2004-2019. Comparison of 'active care', 'comfort care' and 'other' groups was quantified and comments reviewed.

Results: 442 of 787 (56%) eligible women were contacted, 242 of 442 (55%) completed surveys, response rate 242 of 787 (31%). Women not contacted were younger (p=0.0001) and/or delivered in an earlier year (p=0.002). There was a higher percentage of white women who completed the survey (p=0.004). Decision regret was elevated in all groups, varied widely, but was lower in 'active care' compared with 'comfort care' (Decision Regret Score 14 vs 39, p<0.0001). Lower decision regret occurred in women who recalled a prenatal consult (p=0.014) or identified as the primary decision-maker compared with women who perceived the doctor had a major role (p=0.02) or made the decision (p<0.0001). Lower decision regret occurred in women whose infant was alive at survey completion compared with women whose infant died in the hospital (p<0.0001) or after discharge (p=0.01).

Conclusions: Decision regret was elevated in all groups. Women who recalled prenatal consultation, identified as the primary decision-maker, chose intensive care and/or whose infant survived had lower regret scores.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04074525.

Objective: To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation.

Design: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Setting: Two neonatal intensive care units.

Methods: Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs).

Results: One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions.

Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols.

Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.

Objective: When extremely premature birth at the limits of viability is imminent, shared decision-making with parents regarding the infant's treatment is widely recommended. Aligning decisions with parental values can be challenging. So, this study aims to get insight into (1) what values parents considered important in their decision, (2) whether their decision was based on intuition and/or rational analysis and (3) parental suggestions on how to help explore and articulate values during prenatal counselling.

Design: A qualitative study was performed among Dutch parents who experienced (imminent) extremely premature birth. Diversity was aimed for through purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were coded and themes were derived from the data.

Results: Nineteen interviews were performed. Results show what parents considered important in their decision, such as the infants' future, family life and 'giving a chance'. Most parents made their decision more intuitively rather than rationally, for others both coexisted. Particularly fathers and parents who opted for palliative comfort care experienced the decision as rational. Parents would have liked to explore values, but found it challenging. They suggested strategies and conditions to help explore and articulate their values during counselling, such as a multidisciplinary approach.

Conclusions: Various considerations and underlying values were found to be important. Parents recognise the influence of emotions and intuition in decision-making and struggle to articulate their values, emphasising the need for guidance. Healthcare providers should engage in open, personalised discussions to facilitate value exploration, enabling informed decisions aligned with parental values.

Background: Heat-inactivated probiotics (HPs) may provide an effective alternative to live probiotics (P) by avoiding their risks (eg, probiotic sepsis) while retaining the benefits. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a HP in very preterm (VP: gestation <32 weeks) infants.

Methods: VP infants were randomly allocated to receive a HP or P mixture (Bifidobacterium breve M-16V, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis M-63, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BB536, total 3×10⁹CFU/day) assuring blinding. Primary outcome was faecal calprotectin (FCP) levels were compared after 3 weeks of supplementation. Secondary outcomes included faecal microbiota and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels.

Results: 86 VP infants were randomised to HP or P group (n=43 each). Total FCP and SCFA were comparable between HP and P groups within 7 days (T1) and between day 21 and 28 (T2) after supplementation. At T2, median (range) FCP was 75 (8-563) in the HP group and 80 (21-277) in the P group (p=0.71). Propionate was significantly raised in both groups, while butyrate was significantly raised in the HP group (all p<0.01). Bacterial richness and diversity increased but was comparable between HP and P (p>0.05). Beta diversity showed similar community structures in both groups (all p>0.05). Changes in faecal Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacteriacae levels were comparable in both groups at T1 and T2. There was no probiotic sepsis.

Conclusions: HP was safe and showed no significant difference in FCP as compared with a live probiotic. Adequately powered trials are needed to assess the effects of HP on clinically significant outcomes in preterm infants.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12618000489291.

Objective: To investigate the perspectives of experienced parents regarding guidelines and personalisation for managing imminent extremely premature births (22-26 weeks gestational age (GA)) . The study examined four scenarios: no guideline, a guideline based on GA, a guideline based on GA plus other factors and a guideline based on a calculated prognosis.

Design: Nineteen semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with Dutch parents who experienced (imminent) extremely premature births between 23+5 and 26+2 weeks of gestation. Diversity was aimed for through purposive sampling from a database created prior to this study. Four of the parents opted for palliative care. Among the parents who chose intensive care, in nine cases the infant(s) survived.

Results: All participants acknowledged the necessity of having a periviability guideline because it would provide valuable decision-making support, and counterbalance decisions solely based on parental instincts to save their infant. Parents preferred guidelines that considered multiple prognostic factors beyond GA alone, without overwhelming parents with information, because more information would not necessarily make the decision easier for parents. Personalisation was defined by parents mainly as 'being seen and heard' and associated with building relationships with healthcare professionals and effective communication between them and professionals.

Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of having a periviability guideline including multiple prognostic factors to assist parents in making decisions at the limit of viability, and the importance of a personalised care approach to meet parental needs in the context of imminent extremely preterm birth.