首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition最新文献

英文 中文
Doxapram for apnoea of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5-6 years. 多沙普仑治疗早产儿呼吸暂停与 5-6 岁时的神经发育结果。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326170
Ludovic Tréluyer, Elodie Zana-Taieb, Pierre-Henri Jarreau, Valérie Benhammou, Pierre Kuhn, Mathilde Letouzey, Laetitia Marchand-Martin, Wes Onland, Véronique Pierrat, Lauren Saade, Pierre Yves Ancel, Héloïse Torchin

Objective: To assess the long-term neurodevelopmental impact of doxapram for treating apnoea of prematurity.

Design: Secondary analysis of the French national cohort study EPIPAGE-2. Recruitment took place in 2011. A standardised neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at age 5-6 years. A 2:1 propensity score matching was used to control for the non-randomised assignment of doxapram treatment.

Setting: Population-based cohort study.

Patients: All children born before 32 weeks' gestation alive at age 5-6 years.

Interventions: Blind and standardised assessment by trained neuropsychologists and paediatricians at age 5-6 years.

Main outcome measures: Neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5-6 years assessed by trained paediatricians and neuropsychologists: cerebral palsy, developmental coordination disorders, IQ and behavioural difficulties. A composite criterion for overall neurodevelopmental disabilities was built.

Results: The population consisted of 2950 children; 275 (8.6%) received doxapram. Median (IQR) gestational age was 29.4 (27.6-30.9) weeks. At age 5-6 years, complete neurodevelopmental assessment was available for 60.3% (1780 of 2950) of children and partial assessment for 10.6% (314 of 2950). In the initial sample, children receiving doxapram had evidence of greater clinical severity than those not treated. Doxapram treatment was associated with overall neurodevelopmental disabilities of any severity (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.92, p=0.02). Eight hundred and twenty-one children were included in the 2:1 matched sample. In this sample, perinatal characteristics of both groups were similar and doxapram treatment was not associated with overall neurodevelopmental disabilities (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.57, p=0.63).

Conclusions: In children born before 32 weeks' gestation, doxapram treatment for apnoea of prematurity was not associated with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

目的:评估多沙普仑治疗早产儿呼吸暂停对神经发育的长期影响:评估多沙普仑治疗早产儿呼吸暂停对神经发育的长期影响:法国国家队列研究 EPIPAGE-2 的二次分析。2011年进行了招募。对5-6岁儿童进行了标准化神经发育评估。采用2:1倾向得分匹配法控制多沙普仑治疗的非随机分配:背景:基于人群的队列研究:干预措施:由受过训练的神经科医生进行盲法和标准化评估:干预措施:由训练有素的神经心理学家和儿科医生对5-6岁儿童进行盲法标准化评估:由训练有素的儿科医生和神经心理学家对 5-6 岁儿童的神经发育结果进行评估:脑瘫、发育协调障碍、智商和行为障碍。结果:研究对象包括2950名儿童,其中275名(8.6%)接受了多沙普仑治疗。胎龄中位数(IQR)为29.4周(27.6-30.9周)。5-6岁时,60.3%的儿童(2950名儿童中的1780名)接受了完整的神经发育评估,10.6%的儿童(2950名儿童中的314名)接受了部分评估。在初始样本中,接受多沙普仑治疗的儿童比未接受治疗的儿童有更严重的临床症状。多沙普仑治疗与任何严重程度的总体神经发育障碍均有关联(OR 1.43,95% CI 1.07至1.92,P=0.02)。821名儿童被纳入2:1匹配样本。在该样本中,两组围产期特征相似,多沙普仑治疗与总体神经发育障碍无关(OR 1.09,95% CI 0.76至1.57,P=0.63):在妊娠32周前出生的儿童中,多沙普仑治疗早产儿呼吸暂停与神经发育障碍无关。
{"title":"Doxapram for apnoea of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5-6 years.","authors":"Ludovic Tréluyer, Elodie Zana-Taieb, Pierre-Henri Jarreau, Valérie Benhammou, Pierre Kuhn, Mathilde Letouzey, Laetitia Marchand-Martin, Wes Onland, Véronique Pierrat, Lauren Saade, Pierre Yves Ancel, Héloïse Torchin","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326170","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the long-term neurodevelopmental impact of doxapram for treating apnoea of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the French national cohort study EPIPAGE-2. Recruitment took place in 2011. A standardised neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at age 5-6 years. A 2:1 propensity score matching was used to control for the non-randomised assignment of doxapram treatment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Population-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All children born before 32 weeks' gestation alive at age 5-6 years.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Blind and standardised assessment by trained neuropsychologists and paediatricians at age 5-6 years.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5-6 years assessed by trained paediatricians and neuropsychologists: cerebral palsy, developmental coordination disorders, IQ and behavioural difficulties. A composite criterion for overall neurodevelopmental disabilities was built.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 2950 children; 275 (8.6%) received doxapram. Median (IQR) gestational age was 29.4 (27.6-30.9) weeks. At age 5-6 years, complete neurodevelopmental assessment was available for 60.3% (1780 of 2950) of children and partial assessment for 10.6% (314 of 2950). In the initial sample, children receiving doxapram had evidence of greater clinical severity than those not treated. Doxapram treatment was associated with overall neurodevelopmental disabilities of any severity (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.92, p=0.02). Eight hundred and twenty-one children were included in the 2:1 matched sample. In this sample, perinatal characteristics of both groups were similar and doxapram treatment was not associated with overall neurodevelopmental disabilities (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.57, p=0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children born before 32 weeks' gestation, doxapram treatment for apnoea of prematurity was not associated with neurodevelopmental disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"443-449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139478147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fantoms. Fantoms.
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327488
Ben J Stenson
{"title":"Fantoms.","authors":"Ben J Stenson","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327488","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":"109 4","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141426193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns (SURV1VE): A cluster randomised controlled trial. 在对窒息新生儿进行心肺复苏时,持续充气和胸外按压与 3:1 的胸外按压和通气比(SURV1VE):分组随机对照试验。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326383
Georg M Schmölzer, Gerhard Pichler, Anne Lee Solevåg, Brenda Hiu Yan Law, Souvik Mitra, Michael Wagner, Daniel Pfurtscheller, Maryna Yaskina, Po-Yin Cheung

Objective: In newborn infants requiring chest compression (CC) in the delivery room (DR) does continuous CC superimposed by a sustained inflation (CC+SI) compared with a 3:1 compression:ventilation (3:1 C:V) ratio decreases time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Design: International, multicenter, prospective, cluster cross-over randomised trial.

Setting: DR in four hospitals in Canada and Austria, PARTICIPANTS: Newborn infants >28 weeks' gestation who required CC.

Interventions: Hospitals were randomised to CC+SI or 3:1 C:V then crossed over to the other intervention.

Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was time to ROSC, defined as the duration of CC until an increase in heart rate >60/min determined by auscultation of the heart, which was maintained for 60 s. Sample size of 218 infants (109/group) was sufficient to detect a clinically important 33% reduction (282 vs 420 s of CC) in time to ROSC. Analysis was intention-to-treat.

Results: Patient recruitment occurred between 19 October 2017 and 22 September 2022 and randomised 27 infants (CC+SI (n=12), 3:1 C:V (n=15), two (one per group) declined consent). All 11 infants in the CC+SI group and 12/14 infants in the 3:1 C:V group achieved ROSC in the DR. The median (IQR) time to ROSC was 90 (60-270) s and 615 (174-780) s (p=0.0502 (log rank), p=0.16 (cox proportional hazards regression)) with CC+SI and 3:1 C:V, respectively. Mortality was 2/11 (18.2%) with CC+SI versus 8/14 (57.1%) with 3:1 C:V (p=0.10 (Fisher's exact test), OR (95% CI) 0.17; (0.03 to 1.07)). The trial was stopped due to issues with ethics approval and securing trial insurance as well as funding reasons.

Conclusion: The time to ROSC and mortality was not statistical different between CC+SI and 3:1 C:V.

Trial registration: NCT02858583.

目的:对于需要在产房(DR)进行胸外按压(CC)的新生儿,与按压:通气(3:1 C:V)比例为 3:1 相比,持续按压叠加持续通气(CC+SI)是否会缩短自发性循环(ROSC)恢复时间:国际、多中心、前瞻性、分组交叉随机试验:环境: 加拿大和奥地利四家医院的 DR:干预措施:主要结果测量指标:主要结果为ROSC时间,即CC持续到心脏听诊确定心率上升>60/min并维持60秒的时间。218名婴儿(109名/组)的样本量足以检测到ROSC时间缩短了33%(282秒与420秒CC),这在临床上具有重要意义。分析方法为意向治疗:患者招募时间为 2017 年 10 月 19 日至 2022 年 9 月 22 日,共随机招募了 27 名婴儿(CC+SI(n=12),3:1 C:V(n=15),2 人(每组 1 人)拒绝同意)。CC+SI组的所有11名婴儿和3:1 C:V组的12/14名婴儿在DR中均实现了ROSC。CC+SI和3:1 C:V的ROSC时间中位数(IQR)分别为90(60-270)秒和615(174-780)秒(p=0.0502(对数秩),p=0.16(cox比例危险回归))。CC+SI的死亡率为2/11(18.2%),而3:1 C:V的死亡率为8/14(57.1%)(P=0.10(费雪精确检验),OR(95% CI)为0.17;(0.03至1.07))。由于伦理审批、确保试验保险以及资金等问题,试验被终止:结论:CC+SI和3:1 C:V的ROSC时间和死亡率没有统计学差异:NCT02858583.
{"title":"<u>Su</u>stained inflation and chest comp<u>r</u>ession <u>v</u>ersus 3:<u>1</u> chest compression to <u>v</u>entilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated n<u>e</u>wborns (SURV1VE): A cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Georg M Schmölzer, Gerhard Pichler, Anne Lee Solevåg, Brenda Hiu Yan Law, Souvik Mitra, Michael Wagner, Daniel Pfurtscheller, Maryna Yaskina, Po-Yin Cheung","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326383","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In newborn infants requiring chest compression (CC) in the delivery room (DR) does continuous CC superimposed by a sustained inflation (CC+SI) compared with a 3:1 compression:ventilation (3:1 C:V) ratio decreases time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>International, multicenter, prospective, cluster cross-over randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>DR in four hospitals in Canada and Austria, PARTICIPANTS: Newborn infants >28 weeks' gestation who required CC.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Hospitals were randomised to CC+SI or 3:1 C:V then crossed over to the other intervention.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome was time to ROSC, defined as the duration of CC until an increase in heart rate >60/min determined by auscultation of the heart, which was maintained for 60 s. Sample size of 218 infants (109/group) was sufficient to detect a clinically important 33% reduction (282 vs 420 s of CC) in time to ROSC. Analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient recruitment occurred between 19 October 2017 and 22 September 2022 and randomised 27 infants (CC+SI (n=12), 3:1 C:V (n=15), two (one per group) declined consent). All 11 infants in the CC+SI group and 12/14 infants in the 3:1 C:V group achieved ROSC in the DR. The median (IQR) time to ROSC was 90 (60-270) s and 615 (174-780) s (p=0.0502 (log rank), p=0.16 (cox proportional hazards regression)) with CC+SI and 3:1 C:V, respectively. Mortality was 2/11 (18.2%) with CC+SI versus 8/14 (57.1%) with 3:1 C:V (p=0.10 (Fisher's exact test), OR (95% CI) 0.17; (0.03 to 1.07)). The trial was stopped due to issues with ethics approval and securing trial insurance as well as funding reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time to ROSC and mortality was not statistical different between CC+SI and 3:1 C:V.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02858583.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"428-435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228189/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139428410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants. 早产儿使用不同传感器读取脉搏血氧仪读数的随机交叉研究。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325961
Christian Achim Maiwald, Christoph E Schwarz, Katrin Böckmann, Laila Springer, Christian F Poets, Axel Franz

Objective: In extremely preterm infants, different target ranges for pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) may affect mortality and morbidity. Thus, the impact of technical changes potentially affecting measurements should be assessed. We studied SpO2 readings from different sensors for systematic deviations.

Design: Single-centre, randomised, triple crossover study.

Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients: 24 infants, born at <32 weeks' gestation, with current weight <1500 g and without right-to-left shunt via a patent ductus arteriosus.

Interventions: Simultaneous readings from three SpO2 sensors (Red Diamond (RD), Photoplethysmography (PPG), Low Noise Cabled Sensors (LNCS)) were logged at 0.5 Hz over 6 hour/infant and compared with LNCS as control using analysis of variance. Sensor position was randomly allocated and rotated every 2 hours. Seven different batches each were used.

Outcomes: Primary outcome was the difference in SpO2 readings. Secondary outcomes were differences between sensors in the proportion of time within the SpO2-target range (90-95 (100)%).

Results: Mean gestational age at birth (±SD) was 274/7 (±23/7) weeks, postnatal age 20 (±20) days. 134 hours of recording were analysed. Mean SpO2 (±SD) was 94.0% (±3.8; LNCS) versus 92.2% (±4.0; RD; p<0.0001) and 94.5% (±3.9; PPG; p<0.0001), respectively. Mean SpO2 difference (95% CI) was -1.8% (-1.9 to -1.8; RD) and 0.5% (0.4 to 0.5; PPG). Proportion of time in target was significantly lower with RD sensors (84.8% vs 91.7%; p=0.0001) and similar with PPG sensors (91.1% vs 91.7%; p=0.63).

Conclusion: There were systematic differences in SpO2 readings between RD sensors versus LNCS. These findings may impact mortality and morbidity of preterm infants, particularly when aiming for higher SpO2-target ranges (eg, 90-95%).

Trial registration number: DRKS00027285.

目的:对于极早产儿,脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)的不同目标范围可能会影响死亡率和发病率。因此,应对可能影响测量结果的技术变化的影响进行评估。我们研究了不同传感器的 SpO2 读数是否存在系统性偏差:单中心、随机、三交叉研究:地点:三级新生儿重症监护病房:干预措施以 0.5 Hz 的频率记录三个 SpO2 传感器(红钻石传感器 (RD)、光电血压计 (PPG)、低噪音有线传感器 (LNCS))在 6 小时/婴儿期间的同步读数,并使用方差分析将其与作为对照的 LNCS 进行比较。传感器位置随机分配,每 2 小时轮换一次。共使用了七个不同的批次:主要结果是 SpO2 读数的差异。次要结果是不同传感器在 SpO2 目标范围(90-95 (100)%)内的时间比例差异:出生时的平均胎龄(±SD)为 274/7 (±23/7) 周,产后年龄为 20 (±20) 天。分析了 134 个小时的记录。平均 SpO2(±SD)为 94.0%(±3.8;LNCS)与 92.2%(±4.0;RD);P2 差值(95% CI)分别为-1.8%(-1.9 至-1.8;RD)和 0.5%(0.4 至 0.5;PPG)。RD传感器的目标时间比例明显较低(84.8% vs 91.7%;P=0.0001),PPG传感器的目标时间比例与之相似(91.1% vs 91.7%;P=0.63):结论:RD 传感器与 LNCS 之间的 SpO2 读数存在系统性差异。这些发现可能会影响早产儿的死亡率和发病率,尤其是在追求更高的 SpO2 目标范围(如 90-95%)时:DRKS00027285.
{"title":"Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants.","authors":"Christian Achim Maiwald, Christoph E Schwarz, Katrin Böckmann, Laila Springer, Christian F Poets, Axel Franz","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-325961","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-325961","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In extremely preterm infants, different target ranges for pulse oximeter saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) may affect mortality and morbidity. Thus, the impact of technical changes potentially affecting measurements should be assessed. We studied SpO<sub>2</sub> readings from different sensors for systematic deviations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre, randomised, triple crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>24 infants, born at <32 weeks' gestation, with current weight <1500 g and without right-to-left shunt via a patent ductus arteriosus.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Simultaneous readings from three SpO<sub>2</sub> sensors (Red Diamond (RD), Photoplethysmography (PPG), Low Noise Cabled Sensors (LNCS)) were logged at 0.5 Hz over 6 hour/infant and compared with LNCS as control using analysis of variance. Sensor position was randomly allocated and rotated every 2 hours. Seven different batches each were used.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Primary outcome was the difference in SpO<sub>2</sub> readings. Secondary outcomes were differences between sensors in the proportion of time within the SpO<sub>2</sub>-target range (90-95 (100)%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean gestational age at birth (±SD) was 27<sup>4/7</sup> (±2<sup>3/7</sup>) weeks, postnatal age 20 (±20) days. 134 hours of recording were analysed. Mean SpO<sub>2</sub> (±SD) was 94.0% (±3.8; LNCS) versus 92.2% (±4.0; RD; p<0.0001) and 94.5% (±3.9; PPG; p<0.0001), respectively. Mean SpO<sub>2</sub> difference (95% CI) was -1.8% (-1.9 to -1.8; RD) and 0.5% (0.4 to 0.5; PPG). Proportion of time in target was significantly lower with RD sensors (84.8% vs 91.7%; p=0.0001) and similar with PPG sensors (91.1% vs 91.7%; p=0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were systematic differences in SpO<sub>2</sub> readings between RD sensors versus LNCS. These findings may impact mortality and morbidity of preterm infants, particularly when aiming for higher SpO<sub>2</sub>-target ranges (eg, 90-95%).</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>DRKS00027285.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"391-396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228211/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138827898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parent-reported health outcomes at preschool age in preterm survivors: a population-based cohort study. 早产儿学龄前健康状况的家长报告:基于人群的队列研究。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326136
Sydney MacDonald, Alexandra Stratas, Anne R Synnes, Navjot Sandila, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Prakesh S Shah, Satvinder Ghotra

Objective: Literature on health status (HS) and health-related quality of life of preterm survivors at preschool age is sparse. Further, little is known about the relationship between parent-reported HS outcomes and standardised neurodevelopmental outcomes measured in preterm survivors at preschool age. Our objective was to evaluate parent-reported child HS outcomes and their relationship to neurodevelopmental outcomes at 36 months of age in very preterm survivors.

Design: Prospective population-based cohort study.

Setting: Perinatal follow-up programme.

Patients: Infants <31 weeks' gestational age born from 2014 to 2016.

Outcome measures: Parents completed the Health Status Classification System for Pre-School Children questionnaire at 36 months. At the same age, neurodevelopmental assessments were completed to determine neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). NDI was categorised as none, 'mild' or 'significant' (moderate or severe cerebral palsy, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition <70, blind or required hearing aid).

Results: Of 118 children, 87 (73.7%) parents reported their child had an HS concern (mild: 61 (51%); moderate: 16 (13.6%); and severe: 10 (8.5%)). Mild and significant NDIs were observed in 17 (14.4%) and 14 (11.9%) children, respectively. For the 14 (12%) children with significant NDI, 7 (50.0%) parents reported severe and 4 (28.6%) reported moderate concerns. Conversely, for 26 (22%) children with parent-reported moderate to severe concerns, 11 (42.3%) met the criteria for significant NDI. There was a moderate positive correlation between parental concern and NDI status (Spearman correlation=0.46, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Parental HS concerns only moderately correlated with the NDI status. Of the 12% of children with significant NDI, only half of the parents reported severe HS concerns.

目的:有关学龄前早产儿健康状况(HS)和健康相关生活质量的文献很少。此外,关于家长报告的健康状况结果与早产儿学龄前标准化神经发育结果之间的关系也知之甚少。我们的目标是评估父母报告的儿童 HS 结果及其与极早产儿 36 个月大时神经发育结果之间的关系:设计:基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:患者:婴儿结果测量:父母在婴儿36个月时填写学龄前儿童健康状况分类系统问卷。在同一年龄段完成神经发育评估,以确定神经发育障碍(NDI)。神经发育障碍分为无、"轻度 "或 "重度"(中度或重度脑瘫,贝利婴幼儿发育量表--第三版):在 118 名儿童中,有 87 名(73.7%)家长表示他们的孩子有 HS 方面的问题(轻度:61 名(51%);中度:16 名(13.6%);重度:15 名(13.6%)):16(13.6%);严重:10(8.5%)。分别有 17 名(14.4%)和 14 名(11.9%)儿童出现轻度和重度 NDI。在 14 名(12%)有显著 NDI 的儿童中,7 名(50.0%)家长表示严重关切,4 名(28.6%)表示中度关切。相反,在 26 名(22%)家长报告有中度至重度担忧的儿童中,有 11 名(42.3%)达到了显著 NDI 的标准。家长的担忧与 NDI 状态之间存在中度正相关(Spearman correlation=0.46,p 结论:家长对 HS 的担忧与 NDI 状态仅有中度相关性。在 12% 有显著 NDI 的儿童中,只有一半的家长表示对 HS 有严重的担忧。
{"title":"Parent-reported health outcomes at preschool age in preterm survivors: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Sydney MacDonald, Alexandra Stratas, Anne R Synnes, Navjot Sandila, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Prakesh S Shah, Satvinder Ghotra","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326136","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Literature on health status (HS) and health-related quality of life of preterm survivors at preschool age is sparse. Further, little is known about the relationship between parent-reported HS outcomes and standardised neurodevelopmental outcomes measured in preterm survivors at preschool age. Our objective was to evaluate parent-reported child HS outcomes and their relationship to neurodevelopmental outcomes at 36 months of age in very preterm survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective population-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Perinatal follow-up programme.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants <31 weeks' gestational age born from 2014 to 2016.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Parents completed the Health Status Classification System for Pre-School Children questionnaire at 36 months. At the same age, neurodevelopmental assessments were completed to determine neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). NDI was categorised as none, 'mild' or 'significant' (moderate or severe cerebral palsy, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition <70, blind or required hearing aid).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 118 children, 87 (73.7%) parents reported their child had an HS concern (mild: 61 (51%); moderate: 16 (13.6%); and severe: 10 (8.5%)). Mild and significant NDIs were observed in 17 (14.4%) and 14 (11.9%) children, respectively. For the 14 (12%) children with significant NDI, 7 (50.0%) parents reported severe and 4 (28.6%) reported moderate concerns. Conversely, for 26 (22%) children with parent-reported moderate to severe concerns, 11 (42.3%) met the criteria for significant NDI. There was a moderate positive correlation between parental concern and NDI status (Spearman correlation=0.46, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parental HS concerns only moderately correlated with the NDI status. Of the 12% of children with significant NDI, only half of the parents reported severe HS concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"436-442"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138884008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. 澳大利亚先天性膈疝十大研究重点:James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327108
Roberto Chiletti, Courtney Vodopic, Emiko Hunt, Jess Lawer, Monique Bertinetti, Stephanie Malarbi, Valerie Kyritsis, Scott Petersen, David Stewart, Jean Hellstern, Michael Stewart, Leah Hickey, David G Tingay, Trisha M Prentice

Objectives: The Gaps in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Journey Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was developed in collaboration with CDH Australia, James Lind Alliance (JLA) and the Murdoch Children's Research Institute to identify research priorities for people with CDH, their families and healthcare workers in Australasia.

Design: Research PSP in accordance with the JLA standardised methodology.

Setting: Australian community and institutions caring for patients with CDH and their families.

Patients: CDH survivors, families of children born with CDH (including bereaved) and healthcare professionals including critical care physicians and nurses (neonatal and paediatric), obstetric, surgical, allied health professionals (physiotherapists, speech pathologists and speech therapists) and general practitioners.

Main outcome measure: Top 10 research priorities for CDH.

Results: 377 questions, from a community-based online survey, were categorised and collated into 50 research questions. Through a further prioritisation process, 21 questions were then discussed at a prioritisation workshop where they were ranked by 21 participants (CDH survivors, parents of children born with CDH (bereaved and not) and 11 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals) into their top 10 research priorities.

Conclusion: Stakeholders' involvement identified the top 10 CDH-related research questions, spanning from antenatal care to long-term functional outcomes, that should be prioritised for future research to maximise meaningful outcomes for people with CDH and their families.

目标:先天性膈疝(CDH)之旅中的空白点优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP)是与澳大利亚 CDH 协会、詹姆斯-林德联盟(JLA)和默多克儿童研究所合作开发的,旨在为澳大拉西亚的 CDH 患者、其家人和医护人员确定研究优先事项:设计:根据 JLA 标准化方法开展 PSP 研究:环境:澳大利亚社区和护理 CDH 患者及其家属的机构:患者:CDH幸存者、CDH患儿家属(包括遗属)和医护人员,包括重症监护医生和护士(新生儿和儿科)、产科、外科、专职医护人员(物理治疗师、言语病理学家和言语治疗师)以及全科医生:对社区在线调查中的 377 个问题进行了分类,并整理成 50 个研究问题。通过进一步的优先排序过程,21 个参与者(CDH 幸存者、CDH 患儿的父母(丧子者和非丧子者)以及 11 名多学科医护人员)在优先排序研讨会上讨论了 21 个问题,并将其排序为 10 大研究重点:利益相关者的参与确定了与 CDH 相关的 10 大研究问题,从产前护理到长期功能性结果,这些问题都应列为未来研究的优先事项,以便为 CDH 患者及其家庭带来最大的有意义的结果。
{"title":"Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.","authors":"Roberto Chiletti, Courtney Vodopic, Emiko Hunt, Jess Lawer, Monique Bertinetti, Stephanie Malarbi, Valerie Kyritsis, Scott Petersen, David Stewart, Jean Hellstern, Michael Stewart, Leah Hickey, David G Tingay, Trisha M Prentice","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Gaps in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Journey Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was developed in collaboration with CDH Australia, James Lind Alliance (JLA) and the Murdoch Children's Research Institute to identify research priorities for people with CDH, their families and healthcare workers in Australasia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Research PSP in accordance with the JLA standardised methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australian community and institutions caring for patients with CDH and their families.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>CDH survivors, families of children born with CDH (including bereaved) and healthcare professionals including critical care physicians and nurses (neonatal and paediatric), obstetric, surgical, allied health professionals (physiotherapists, speech pathologists and speech therapists) and general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Top 10 research priorities for CDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>377 questions, from a community-based online survey, were categorised and collated into 50 research questions. Through a further prioritisation process, 21 questions were then discussed at a prioritisation workshop where they were ranked by 21 participants (CDH survivors, parents of children born with CDH (bereaved and not) and 11 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals) into their top 10 research priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholders' involvement identified the top 10 CDH-related research questions, spanning from antenatal care to long-term functional outcomes, that should be prioritised for future research to maximise meaningful outcomes for people with CDH and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141330289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying neonatal transport research priorities: a modified Delphi consensus. 确定新生儿转运研究的优先事项:修改后的德尔菲共识。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327213
Aarti Mistry, Andrew Leslie, Shalini Ojha, Don Sharkey

Objectives: With increasing advances in neonatal transport, a focused research strategy is required to increase the evidence base towards providing optimal care. We aimed to identify the most important neonatal transport research questions as prioritised by parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Design: Key stakeholders participated in a modified three-stage Delphi consensus process. Research questions were identified and submitted through two survey stages before the final priority setting workshop.

Participants: Parents of babies who received neonatal care, neonatal HCPs and stakeholders.

Outcome: Identify the top 10 research priorities for neonatal transport.

Results: Overall, 269 survey responses from HCPs/stakeholders (n=161) and parents (n=108) were analysed from two survey rounds. Consensus was reached on 22 of 43 research priorities for the final priority setting workshop. The agreed top research priorities covered the domains of: (1) Pain assessment and management, (2) Long-term neurological outcomes, (3) Impact of transfer on birth-related brain injury, (4) Investigating risk of transport, (5) Safety restraints for infants, (6) Optimal temperature management, (7) Respiratory management and outcomes, (8) Benchmarking of important of transport measures, (9) Understanding transport environmental exposures, (10) Mental health and burden of transfer on families.

Conclusion: We have identified the top research questions for neonatal transport through an extensive process actively engaging parents, HCPs and key stakeholders. Targeted funding and research resources, directed towards addressing these prioritised research areas, will inform evidence-based practices and international frameworks specific to neonatal transport, helping minimise research waste and ultimately improve outcomes for these high-risk infants and their families.

目的:随着新生儿转运技术的不断进步,需要制定一项重点突出的研究战略,以增加提供最佳护理的证据基础。我们旨在确定家长和医护人员(HCPs)优先考虑的最重要的新生儿转运研究问题:设计:主要利益相关者参与了经过修改的三阶段德尔菲共识过程。在最后的优先级确定研讨会之前,通过两个调查阶段确定并提交了研究问题:参与人员:接受新生儿护理的婴儿家长、新生儿保健专业人员和利益相关者:结果:确定新生儿转运的 10 大研究重点:两轮调查共分析了 269 份调查问卷,分别来自保健专业人员/利益相关者(n=161)和家长(n=108)。在 43 个优先研究事项中,有 22 个在最后的优先事项确定研讨会上达成了共识。商定的首要研究重点涵盖以下领域(1) 疼痛评估和管理,(2) 长期神经系统结果,(3) 转运对出生相关脑损伤的影响,(4) 调查转运风险,(5) 婴儿安全约束,(6) 最佳体温管理,(7) 呼吸管理和结果,(8) 重要转运措施基准,(9) 了解转运环境暴露,(10) 心理健康和转运对家庭造成的负担:通过家长、医疗保健人员和主要利益相关者的广泛参与,我们确定了新生儿转运的首要研究问题。针对这些优先研究领域的有针对性的资金和研究资源将为新生儿转运的循证实践和国际框架提供信息,有助于最大限度地减少研究浪费,并最终改善这些高风险婴儿及其家庭的预后。
{"title":"Identifying neonatal transport research priorities: a modified Delphi consensus.","authors":"Aarti Mistry, Andrew Leslie, Shalini Ojha, Don Sharkey","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With increasing advances in neonatal transport, a focused research strategy is required to increase the evidence base towards providing optimal care. We aimed to identify the most important neonatal transport research questions as prioritised by parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Key stakeholders participated in a modified three-stage Delphi consensus process. Research questions were identified and submitted through two survey stages before the final priority setting workshop.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Parents of babies who received neonatal care, neonatal HCPs and stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Identify the top 10 research priorities for neonatal transport.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 269 survey responses from HCPs/stakeholders (n=161) and parents (n=108) were analysed from two survey rounds. Consensus was reached on 22 of 43 research priorities for the final priority setting workshop. The agreed top research priorities covered the domains of: (1) Pain assessment and management, (2) Long-term neurological outcomes, (3) Impact of transfer on birth-related brain injury, (4) Investigating risk of transport, (5) Safety restraints for infants, (6) Optimal temperature management, (7) Respiratory management and outcomes, (8) Benchmarking of important of transport measures, (9) Understanding transport environmental exposures, (10) Mental health and burden of transfer on families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have identified the top research questions for neonatal transport through an extensive process actively engaging parents, HCPs and key stakeholders. Targeted funding and research resources, directed towards addressing these prioritised research areas, will inform evidence-based practices and international frameworks specific to neonatal transport, helping minimise research waste and ultimately improve outcomes for these high-risk infants and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141299862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to 'Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants' by Maiwald et al. 对 Maiwald 等人撰写的 "早产儿不同传感器脉搏血氧仪读数的随机交叉研究 "的回应
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327165
Vikrant Sharma, Steven J Barker, Augusto Sola, Daniel Cantillon, Rebecca Sorci, William C Wilson
{"title":"Response to 'Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants' by Maiwald <i>et al</i>.","authors":"Vikrant Sharma, Steven J Barker, Augusto Sola, Daniel Cantillon, Rebecca Sorci, William C Wilson","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327165","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141178843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival and unique clinical practices of extremely preterm infants born at 22-23 weeks' gestation in Japan: a national survey. 日本妊娠 22-23 周极度早产儿的存活率和独特的临床实践:一项全国性调查。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326355
Tetsuya Isayama, Kei Miyakoshi, Fumihiko Namba, Mariko Hida, Ichiro Morioka, Keisuke Ishii, Susumu Miyashita, Shuichiro Uehara, Yoshiaki Kinoshita, Sachie Suga, Katsutoshi Nakahata, Atsushi Uchiyama, Katsufumi Otsuki

Objectives: To investigate prognosis and clinical practices of infants born at 22-23 weeks' gestational age (wkGA) in Japan.

Design: A national institutional-level electronic questionnaire surveys performed in September 2021.

Setting: All perinatal centres across Japan.

Patients: Infants born at 22-23 wkGA in 2018-2020.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of active resuscitation and survival at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge, and various clinical practices.

Results: In total, 255 of 295 NICUs (86%) responded. Among them, 145 took care of infants born at 22-23 wkGA and answered the questions regarding their outcomes and care. In most NICUs (129 of 145 (89%)), infants born at 22+0 wkGA can be actively resuscitated. In almost half of the NICUs (79 of 145 (54%)), infants born at ≥22+0 wkGA were always actively resuscitated. Among 341 and 757 infants born alive at 22 and 23 wkGA, respectively, 85% (291 of 341) and 98% (745 of 757) received active resuscitation after birth. Among infants actively resuscitated at birth, 63% (183 of 291) and 80% (594 of 745) of infants born at 22 and 23 wkGA survived, respectively. The survey revealed unique clinical management for these infants in Japan, including delivery with caul in caesarean section, cut-cord milking after clamping cord, immediate intubation at birth, hydrocortisone use for chronic lung disease, analgesia/sedation use for infants on mechanical ventilation, routine echocardiography and brain ultrasound, probiotics administration, routine glycerin enema and skin dressing to prevent pressure ulcers.

Conclusions: Many 22-23 wkGA infants were actively resuscitated in Japan and had a high survival rate. Various unique clinical practices were highlighted.

目的调查日本胎龄 22-23 周(wkGA)新生儿的预后和临床实践:设计:2021 年 9 月进行的全国性机构级电子问卷调查:背景:日本全国所有围产中心:主要结果指标:主要结果测量:新生儿重症监护室(NICU)出院时的积极复苏比例和存活率,以及各种临床实践:在 295 个新生儿重症监护室中,共有 255 个(86%)做出了回应。其中,145 个新生儿重症监护室接收了 22-23 wkGA 出生的婴儿,并回答了有关其预后和护理的问题。在大多数新生儿重症监护室(145 所中的 129 所(89%))中,22+0 wkGA 出生的婴儿可以进行积极的复苏。在近一半的新生儿重症监护室(145 个新生儿中的 79 个(54%))中,≥22+0 wkGA 时出生的婴儿总是能得到积极的复苏。在分别于 22 和 23 wkGA 出生的 341 和 757 名存活婴儿中,85%(341 名中的 291 名)和 98%(757 名中的 745 名)在出生后接受了积极的复苏。在出生时接受积极复苏的婴儿中,分别有 63% (291 例中的 183 例)和 80% (745 例中的 594 例)在 22 和 23 wkGA 出生时存活。调查显示,日本对这些婴儿采取了独特的临床管理措施,包括剖腹产时使用脐带绕颈分娩、脐带钳夹后剪断脐带挤奶、出生时立即插管、使用氢化可的松治疗慢性肺病、对使用机械通气的婴儿使用镇痛/镇静剂、常规超声心动图和脑部超声检查、服用益生菌、常规甘油灌肠和皮肤敷料以预防压疮:结论:在日本,许多 22-23 周婴幼儿都得到了积极的复苏,并且存活率很高。结论:在日本,许多 22-23 周岁的GA 婴儿都得到了积极抢救,存活率很高。
{"title":"Survival and unique clinical practices of extremely preterm infants born at 22-23 weeks' gestation in Japan: a national survey.","authors":"Tetsuya Isayama, Kei Miyakoshi, Fumihiko Namba, Mariko Hida, Ichiro Morioka, Keisuke Ishii, Susumu Miyashita, Shuichiro Uehara, Yoshiaki Kinoshita, Sachie Suga, Katsutoshi Nakahata, Atsushi Uchiyama, Katsufumi Otsuki","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate prognosis and clinical practices of infants born at 22-23 weeks' gestational age (wkGA) in Japan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A national institutional-level electronic questionnaire surveys performed in September 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All perinatal centres across Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants born at 22-23 wkGA in 2018-2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of active resuscitation and survival at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge, and various clinical practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 255 of 295 NICUs (86%) responded. Among them, 145 took care of infants born at 22-23 wkGA and answered the questions regarding their outcomes and care. In most NICUs (129 of 145 (89%)), infants born at 22<sup>+0</sup> wkGA can be actively resuscitated. In almost half of the NICUs (79 of 145 (54%)), infants born at ≥22<sup>+0</sup> wkGA were always actively resuscitated. Among 341 and 757 infants born alive at 22 and 23 wkGA, respectively, 85% (291 of 341) and 98% (745 of 757) received active resuscitation after birth. Among infants actively resuscitated at birth, 63% (183 of 291) and 80% (594 of 745) of infants born at 22 and 23 wkGA survived, respectively. The survey revealed unique clinical management for these infants in Japan, including delivery with caul in caesarean section, cut-cord milking after clamping cord, immediate intubation at birth, hydrocortisone use for chronic lung disease, analgesia/sedation use for infants on mechanical ventilation, routine echocardiography and brain ultrasound, probiotics administration, routine glycerin enema and skin dressing to prevent pressure ulcers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many 22-23 wkGA infants were actively resuscitated in Japan and had a high survival rate. Various unique clinical practices were highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141079678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing and dosage of intrapartum prophylactic penicillin for preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease: assessing maternal and umbilical cord blood concentration. 产前预防性青霉素预防早发 B 组链球菌病的时机和剂量:评估母体和脐带血的浓度。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-326986
Stine Yde Nielsen, Elke Hoffmann-Lücke, Tine Brink Henriksen, Camilla Mirian Hartvigsen, Rikke Bek Helmig, Mohammed Rohi Khalil, Jens Kjølseth Møller, Lars Henning Pedersen, May Murra, Eva Greibe

Objective: Timing of administration of antibiotics and concentrations in maternal blood and the umbilical cord blood are important prerequisites for optimal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of neonatal early-onset group B streptococcus (GBS) disease. This cohort study aimed to explore penicillin concentrations in mothers and infants at birth in relation to time elapsed from administration to delivery and to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for GBS.

Main outcome measures: Penicillin G concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood in relation to time and dose from administration to time of delivery.

Results: In 44 mother-infant dyads, median maternal penicillin G concentration was 0.2 mg/L (IQR 0-0.8 mg/L; range 0-1.6 mg/L). Median infant penicillin G concentration was 1.2 mg/L (IQR 0.5-5.0 mg/L; range 0-12.7 mg/L). In all infants (N=38) born less than 4 hours after the latest IAP administration, penicillin G concentrations far exceeded MIC (0.125 mg/L), even after short time intervals between IAP administration and birth. The highest plasma concentrations were reached in umbilical cord blood within 1 hour from IAP administration to birth.For 44 mother-infant dyads, maternal concentrations were very low compared with their infants'; particularly, very high concentrations were seen in the 20 infants with only one dose of IAP.

Conclusion: High concentrations of penicillin G were found in umbilical cord blood of infants born less than 4 hours after IAP administration, well above the MIC for GBS.

目的:抗生素的给药时机以及母体血液和脐带血中的浓度是对新生儿早发型乙型链球菌(GBS)疾病进行最佳产前抗生素预防(IAP)的重要前提。这项队列研究旨在探讨出生时母婴体内的青霉素浓度与从用药到分娩的时间以及对 GBS 的最小抑菌浓度 (MIC) 的关系:产妇和脐带血中青霉素 G 的浓度与从用药到分娩的时间和剂量的关系:44对母婴中,母体青霉素G浓度中位数为0.2毫克/升(IQR为0-0.8毫克/升;范围为0-1.6毫克/升)。婴儿青霉素 G 浓度中位数为 1.2 毫克/升(IQR 0.5-5.0 毫克/升;范围 0-12.7 毫克/升)。在最近一次注射 IAP 后不到 4 小时出生的所有婴儿(38 人)中,青霉素 G 的浓度都远远超过了 MIC 值(0.125 mg/L),即使注射 IAP 和出生之间的间隔时间很短也是如此。在 44 对母婴组合中,母婴体内的青霉素 G 浓度与婴儿体内的青霉素 G 浓度相比非常低;特别是在 20 个只服用过一次 IAP 的婴儿体内,青霉素 G 浓度非常高:结论:在注射 IAP 后不到 4 小时出生的婴儿的脐带血中发现了高浓度的青霉素 G,远高于 GBS 的 MIC 值。
{"title":"Timing and dosage of intrapartum prophylactic penicillin for preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease: assessing maternal and umbilical cord blood concentration.","authors":"Stine Yde Nielsen, Elke Hoffmann-Lücke, Tine Brink Henriksen, Camilla Mirian Hartvigsen, Rikke Bek Helmig, Mohammed Rohi Khalil, Jens Kjølseth Møller, Lars Henning Pedersen, May Murra, Eva Greibe","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-326986","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-326986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Timing of administration of antibiotics and concentrations in maternal blood and the umbilical cord blood are important prerequisites for optimal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of neonatal early-onset group B streptococcus (GBS) disease. This cohort study aimed to explore penicillin concentrations in mothers and infants at birth in relation to time elapsed from administration to delivery and to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for GBS.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Penicillin G concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood in relation to time and dose from administration to time of delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 44 mother-infant dyads, median maternal penicillin G concentration was 0.2 mg/L (IQR 0-0.8 mg/L; range 0-1.6 mg/L). Median infant penicillin G concentration was 1.2 mg/L (IQR 0.5-5.0 mg/L; range 0-12.7 mg/L). In all infants (N=38) born less than 4 hours after the latest IAP administration, penicillin G concentrations far exceeded MIC (0.125 mg/L), even after short time intervals between IAP administration and birth. The highest plasma concentrations were reached in umbilical cord blood within 1 hour from IAP administration to birth.For 44 mother-infant dyads, maternal concentrations were very low compared with their infants'; particularly, very high concentrations were seen in the 20 infants with only one dose of IAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High concentrations of penicillin G were found in umbilical cord blood of infants born less than 4 hours after IAP administration, well above the MIC for GBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140904031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1