首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition最新文献

英文 中文
Umbilical cord management strategies and risk of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 脐带管理策略和早产儿脑室内出血的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-10-05 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-329006
Ilari Kuitunen, Marjut Haapanen, Maiju Kekki, Panu Kiviranta

Objectives: To assess the comparative effectiveness of different umbilical cord management strategies for preventing intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study sources: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2025 for relevant randomised controlled trials.

Participants: All preterm neonates born <37+0 weeks of gestation.

Interventions: All umbilical cord management strategies, including immediate cord clamping (ICC), delayed cord clamping (DCC), intact umbilical cord milking (I-UCM), cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM), intact cord stabilisation (ICS), physiology-based cord clamping and extrauterine placental perfusion.

Main outcome measures: Any grade IVH (grades I-IV) and severe IVH (grades III-IV).

Data synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Analyses were stratified for very preterm (<32 weeks) and extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks).

Results: Forty-nine studies with 8706 neonates were included. Thirty-five direct comparisons between strategies were made, but no clear evidence of benefit or harm emerged. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, often downgraded due to imprecision, risk of bias and inconsistency. The most frequent comparison was DCC versus ICC, with 14 studies (RR 0.90, CI 0.65 to 1.26) for any grade IVH and 11 studies (RR 1.14, CI 0.69 to 1.87) for severe IVH. The second most common comparison, DCC versus I-UCM, showed no benefit: RR 1.03 (CI 0.80 to 1.32; eight studies, 2200 participants) and RR 0.77 (CI 0.35 to 1.66; seven studies, 2032 participants). ICS versus DCC was the only comparison which was rated as moderate certainty of evidence for both, any grade IVH (RR 0.96, CI 0.82 to 1.13) and severe IVH (RR 0.91, CI 0.62 to 1.35).

Conclusions: No umbilical cord management strategy was clearly associated with increased or decreased IVH risk. Evidence certainty was generally low to very low, primarily due to bias and imprecision.

目的:评估不同脐带管理策略预防早产儿脑室内出血(IVH)的比较效果。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究来源:检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science从成立到2025年3月的相关随机对照试验。干预措施:所有脐带管理策略,包括立即脐带夹紧(ICC)、延迟脐带夹紧(DCC)、完整脐带挤奶(I-UCM)、切断脐带挤奶(C-UCM)、完整脐带稳定(ICS)、基于生理的脐带夹紧和子宫外胎盘灌注。主要结局指标:任何IVH (I-IV级)和严重IVH (III-IV级)。数据综合:随机效应荟萃分析计算95% ci的风险比(RRs)。对极早产儿进行分层分析(结果:纳入49项研究,共8706名新生儿。在35种不同的策略之间进行了直接比较,但没有明确的证据表明是有益还是有害。证据的确定性从中等到极低不等,往往由于不精确、偏倚风险和不一致而降级。最常见的比较是DCC与ICC,有14项研究(RR 0.90, CI 0.65至1.26)针对任何级别的IVH,有11项研究(RR 1.14, CI 0.69至1.87)针对严重IVH。第二种最常见的比较,DCC与I-UCM,没有显示出任何益处:RR为1.03 (CI 0.80至1.32;8项研究,2200名参与者),RR为0.77 (CI 0.35至1.66;7项研究,2032名参与者)。ICS与DCC是唯一被评为中度证据确定性的比较,任何级别IVH (RR 0.96, CI 0.82至1.13)和严重IVH (RR 0.91, CI 0.62至1.35)。结论:没有脐带管理策略与IVH风险的增加或降低明显相关。证据确定性一般较低至非常低,主要是由于偏见和不精确。
{"title":"Umbilical cord management strategies and risk of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ilari Kuitunen, Marjut Haapanen, Maiju Kekki, Panu Kiviranta","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-329006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the comparative effectiveness of different umbilical cord management strategies for preventing intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2025 for relevant randomised controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All preterm neonates born <37+0 weeks of gestation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All umbilical cord management strategies, including immediate cord clamping (ICC), delayed cord clamping (DCC), intact umbilical cord milking (I-UCM), cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM), intact cord stabilisation (ICS), physiology-based cord clamping and extrauterine placental perfusion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Any grade IVH (grades I-IV) and severe IVH (grades III-IV).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Analyses were stratified for very preterm (<32 weeks) and extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine studies with 8706 neonates were included. Thirty-five direct comparisons between strategies were made, but no clear evidence of benefit or harm emerged. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, often downgraded due to imprecision, risk of bias and inconsistency. The most frequent comparison was DCC versus ICC, with 14 studies (RR 0.90, CI 0.65 to 1.26) for any grade IVH and 11 studies (RR 1.14, CI 0.69 to 1.87) for severe IVH. The second most common comparison, DCC versus I-UCM, showed no benefit: RR 1.03 (CI 0.80 to 1.32; eight studies, 2200 participants) and RR 0.77 (CI 0.35 to 1.66; seven studies, 2032 participants). ICS versus DCC was the only comparison which was rated as moderate certainty of evidence for both, any grade IVH (RR 0.96, CI 0.82 to 1.13) and severe IVH (RR 0.91, CI 0.62 to 1.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No umbilical cord management strategy was clearly associated with increased or decreased IVH risk. Evidence certainty was generally low to very low, primarily due to bias and imprecision.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Duration of apnoea before start of backup ventilation during nCPAP in extremely preterm infants and time spent within the SpO2 target: a randomised cross-over study. 极早产儿nCPAP期间后备通气开始前的呼吸暂停持续时间和SpO2目标内的时间:一项随机交叉研究
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328734
Stephanie Ströbele, Tibor Jung, Dominik Kraft, Nadine Forsteneichner, Eva-Maria Mair, Lisa Schiefele, Sebastian Schmid, Markus Waitz, Vanessa Linhoff, Antje Westhoff, Jens Dreyhaupt, Keywan Sohrabi, Harald Ehrhardt

Objective: Central apnoea due to immaturity of the respiratory drive constitutes the main cause of frequent and prolonged desaturations in extremely preterm (EPT) infants <28 weeks. We investigated the impact of varying the duration of apnoea before backup ventilation (BUV) on the measures of oxygenation in EPT infants during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy.

Design: Single-centre randomised cross-over trial.

Setting: Level 3 neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients: 24 EPT infants on nCPAP with BUV.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the time spent within a predefined oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (88%-95% or ≥88% with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) =0.21) during start of BUV after 4 s of apnoea duration (AD 4) or 16 s of apnoea duration (AD 16) RESULTS: The study was successfully completed in 22 children (median gestational age 24+5 weeks, birth weight 628 g, postnatal age 48 days). Mean time spent within the SpO2 target didn't differ between AD 4 and AD 16 (66.9% vs 67.2%, p=0.88). There were no differences in the time below or above the SpO2 target, prolonged (>30 s, >60 s, >120 s) and severe (<80%, <70%) episodes of hypoxaemias and cerebral tissue oxygenation. Mean FiO2, mean airway pressure, transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure, heart rate and respiratory frequency did not differ while the rate of BUV was significantly higher during AD 4.

Conclusion: Reducing the time of apnoea until start of BUV didn't improve the time spent within the SpO2 target in respiratory unstable EPT infants. Our data demand intensified efforts to specify these settings of non-invasive respiratory support that better achieve this important clinical goal.

Trial registration number: DRKS00031911.

目的:呼吸驱动不成熟导致的中枢性呼吸暂停是极早产儿(EPT)频繁和长时间去饱和的主要原因。环境:三级新生儿重症监护病房。患者:24例EPT患儿接受nCPAP合并BUV治疗。主要结局指标:主要结局指标是在4 s呼吸暂停持续时间(AD 4)或16 s呼吸暂停持续时间(AD 16)后BUV开始时在预定的氧饱和度(SpO2)目标(88%-95%或≥88%吸入氧分数(FiO2) =0.21)内度过的时间。结果:22名儿童(中位胎龄24+5周,出生体重628 g,出生后48天)成功完成研究。在AD 4和AD 16中,SpO2目标内的平均时间没有差异(66.9% vs 67.2%, p=0.88)。SpO2低于或高于目标时间、延长时间(bbb30 s、bbb60 s、>20 s)和严重时间(>20 s)无差异,平均气道压、经皮二氧化碳压、心率和呼吸频率在AD 4期间无差异,但BUV率明显升高。结论:减少呼吸不稳定EPT患儿的呼吸暂停时间并不能改善其SpO2目标时间。我们的数据需要加强努力,明确这些无创呼吸支持的设置,以更好地实现这一重要的临床目标。试验注册号:DRKS00031911。
{"title":"Duration of apnoea before start of backup ventilation during nCPAP in extremely preterm infants and time spent within the SpO<sub>2</sub> target: a randomised cross-over study.","authors":"Stephanie Ströbele, Tibor Jung, Dominik Kraft, Nadine Forsteneichner, Eva-Maria Mair, Lisa Schiefele, Sebastian Schmid, Markus Waitz, Vanessa Linhoff, Antje Westhoff, Jens Dreyhaupt, Keywan Sohrabi, Harald Ehrhardt","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328734","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328734","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Central apnoea due to immaturity of the respiratory drive constitutes the main cause of frequent and prolonged desaturations in extremely preterm (EPT) infants <28 weeks. We investigated the impact of varying the duration of apnoea before backup ventilation (BUV) on the measures of oxygenation in EPT infants during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre randomised cross-over trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 3 neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>24 EPT infants on nCPAP with BUV.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the time spent within a predefined oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) target (88%-95% or ≥88% with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) =0.21) during start of BUV after 4 s of apnoea duration (AD 4) or 16 s of apnoea duration (AD 16) RESULTS: The study was successfully completed in 22 children (median gestational age 24+5 weeks, birth weight 628 g, postnatal age 48 days). Mean time spent within the SpO<sub>2</sub> target didn't differ between AD 4 and AD 16 (66.9% vs 67.2%, p=0.88). There were no differences in the time below or above the SpO<sub>2</sub> target, prolonged (>30 s, >60 s, >120 s) and severe (<80%, <70%) episodes of hypoxaemias and cerebral tissue oxygenation. Mean FiO<sub>2</sub>, mean airway pressure, transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure, heart rate and respiratory frequency did not differ while the rate of BUV was significantly higher during AD 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reducing the time of apnoea until start of BUV didn't improve the time spent within the SpO<sub>2</sub> target in respiratory unstable EPT infants. Our data demand intensified efforts to specify these settings of non-invasive respiratory support that better achieve this important clinical goal.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>DRKS00031911.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145181883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parent reports as developmental outcome measures in neonatal trials: the way forward? 父母报告在新生儿试验中作为发展结果的衡量标准:前进的方向?
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328570
Samantha Johnson, Neil Marlow
{"title":"Parent reports as developmental outcome measures in neonatal trials: the way forward?","authors":"Samantha Johnson, Neil Marlow","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328570","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145147465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening for pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: when, how often and does it matter? 支气管肺发育不良早产儿肺动脉高压筛查:何时、多久、重要吗?
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328405
Samuel J Gentle, Waldemar A Carlo, Namasivayam Ambalavanan

Objective: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) is the most severe endotype of BPD; there is insufficient evidence to support the optimal screening strategy in at-risk infants. We hypothesised that serial echocardiography throughout hospitalisation would improve PH detection with increased negative predictive value (NPV) beyond 36 week's postmenstrual age (PMA).

Study design: This was a single centre cohort study conducted between 2017 and 2023. In infants with BPD-PH, all echocardiograms preceding a diagnostic echocardiogram were included and considered false negatives for prediction of later PH. In infants with BPD alone, all echocardiograms were included and were considered true negatives. These indices were then used to estimate the sensitivity and NPV of echocardiographic screening for PH. In addition, we compared the performance of four different potential echocardiographic screening approaches on the ability to identify infants with BPD-PH.

Results: Data from 394 infants were available for this analysis of whom 258 had BPD alone and 136 had BPD-PH. 2542 echocardiograms were used in estimates of diagnostic accuracy. The highest NPVs occurred with echocardiographic screening starting at 36 weeks' and continuing monthly until discharge. Detection of BPD-PH among infants with BPD differed by screening strategy: 34.5% for comprehensive screening, 20.0% for early screening, 15.0% for singular screening and 30.7% for late screening (p<0.05).

Conclusions: While the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic screening increases at and beyond 36 weeks' PMA, obtaining a singular echocardiogram may be an insufficient screening strategy for the detection of BPD-PH in at-risk infants.

目的:支气管肺发育不良(BPD)相关肺动脉高压(BPD- ph)是BPD最严重的内分型;没有足够的证据支持高危婴儿的最佳筛查策略。我们假设在整个住院期间进行连续超声心动图检查可以改善PH检测,并增加月经后36周(PMA)后的阴性预测值(NPV)。研究设计:这是一项在2017年至2023年间进行的单中心队列研究。对于患有BPD- ph的婴儿,在诊断性超声心动图之前的所有超声心动图都被包括在内,并被认为是假阴性,以预测后来的ph。对于单独患有BPD的婴儿,所有超声心动图都被包括在内,并被认为是真阴性。然后使用这些指标来估计超声心动图筛查ph的敏感性和NPV。此外,我们比较了四种不同的潜在超声心动图筛查方法在识别BPD-PH婴儿能力方面的表现。结果:394名婴儿的数据可用于该分析,其中258名单独患有BPD, 136名患有BPD- ph。2542张超声心动图用于估计诊断准确性。超声心动图筛查的npv最高,从36周开始,每月持续到出院。不同筛查策略对BPD患儿BPD- ph的检出率存在差异:综合筛查34.5%,早期筛查20.0%,单一筛查15.0%,晚期筛查30.7% (p结论:超声心动图筛查的诊断准确性在PMA 36周及以上有所提高,但单一超声心动图可能不足以检测高危婴儿BPD- ph。
{"title":"Screening for pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: when, how often and does it matter?","authors":"Samuel J Gentle, Waldemar A Carlo, Namasivayam Ambalavanan","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-328405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-328405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) is the most severe endotype of BPD; there is insufficient evidence to support the optimal screening strategy in at-risk infants. We hypothesised that serial echocardiography throughout hospitalisation would improve PH detection with increased negative predictive value (NPV) beyond 36 week's postmenstrual age (PMA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a single centre cohort study conducted between 2017 and 2023. In infants with BPD-PH, all echocardiograms preceding a diagnostic echocardiogram were included and considered false negatives for prediction of later PH. In infants with BPD alone, all echocardiograms were included and were considered true negatives. These indices were then used to estimate the sensitivity and NPV of echocardiographic screening for PH. In addition, we compared the performance of four different potential echocardiographic screening approaches on the ability to identify infants with BPD-PH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 394 infants were available for this analysis of whom 258 had BPD alone and 136 had BPD-PH. 2542 echocardiograms were used in estimates of diagnostic accuracy. The highest NPVs occurred with echocardiographic screening starting at 36 weeks' and continuing monthly until discharge. Detection of BPD-PH among infants with BPD differed by screening strategy: 34.5% for comprehensive screening, 20.0% for early screening, 15.0% for singular screening and 30.7% for late screening (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic screening increases at and beyond 36 weeks' PMA, obtaining a singular echocardiogram may be an insufficient screening strategy for the detection of BPD-PH in at-risk infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145005879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for children born very preterm: a systematic review. 预测早产儿的长期神经发育结果:一项系统综述。
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328891
Alice Burnett, Samuel B Axford, Abdulbasit M Seid, Peter J Anderson, Jamie L Waterland, Courtney P Gilchrist, Joy Olsen, Ngoc Nguyen, Alicia Spittle, Lex W Doyle, Jeanie Ling Yoong Cheong

Context: Children born very preterm (<32 weeks' gestation) have increased risk of neurodevelopmental difficulties compared with those born at term. While various neonatal exposures have been linked with later developmental challenges, identifying those at risk of difficulties later in childhood remains a challenge but is essential for targeting early intervention and counselling families.

Objective: To systematically review and synthesise the evidence regarding early medical and environmental factors for neurodevelopmental impairment, cognitive, motor and behavioural outcomes for children born very preterm.

Design: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were searched for articles between 1 January 1990 and 29 April 2024 reporting on a representative, prospective geographical, network-based or multisite cohorts of children born <32 weeks' gestation.

Main outcome measures: Neurodevelopmental impairment, cognitive, motor and emotional-behavioural functioning in children aged 36 months to 18 years. Data were extracted and reported descriptively due to heterogeneity in study measures.

Results: From 18 012 records, 29 studies from 16 cohorts were included. Brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, male sex and lower socioeconomic status were the most consistent predictors of neurodevelopmental impairment, IQ, working memory, cerebral palsy, fine motor skills and some behavioural measures. Emotional problems were generally not associated with neonatal variables investigated to date.

Conclusion: Numerous factors are independently associated with childhood outcomes after being born very preterm, with specific predictors varying across domains of functioning and limited available evidence for some predictor-outcome combinations. Knowledge of these factors may assist in targeting those at highest risk for closer surveillance and early intervention.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022368957.

背景:极早产儿童(目的:系统地回顾和综合有关极早产儿童神经发育障碍、认知、运动和行为结果的早期医学和环境因素的证据。设计:检索MEDLINE、Embase和PubMed在1990年1月1日至2024年4月29日期间报道的具有代表性、前瞻性地理、基于网络或多站点的出生儿童队列的文章。主要结局指标:36个月至18岁儿童的神经发育障碍、认知、运动和情绪行为功能。由于研究测量的异质性,数据被提取并描述性地报告。结果:从18012份记录中,纳入了来自16个队列的29项研究。脑损伤、支气管肺发育不良、男性和较低的社会经济地位是神经发育障碍、智商、工作记忆、脑瘫、精细运动技能和一些行为指标最一致的预测因素。迄今为止,情绪问题通常与新生儿变量调查无关。结论:许多因素与非常早产后的儿童结局独立相关,具体的预测因素在不同的功能领域有所不同,一些预测结果组合的现有证据有限。了解这些因素可能有助于针对高危人群进行更密切的监测和早期干预。普洛斯彼罗注册号crd42022368957。
{"title":"Predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for children born very preterm: a systematic review.","authors":"Alice Burnett, Samuel B Axford, Abdulbasit M Seid, Peter J Anderson, Jamie L Waterland, Courtney P Gilchrist, Joy Olsen, Ngoc Nguyen, Alicia Spittle, Lex W Doyle, Jeanie Ling Yoong Cheong","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Children born very preterm (<32 weeks' gestation) have increased risk of neurodevelopmental difficulties compared with those born at term. While various neonatal exposures have been linked with later developmental challenges, identifying those at risk of difficulties later in childhood remains a challenge but is essential for targeting early intervention and counselling families.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and synthesise the evidence regarding early medical and environmental factors for neurodevelopmental impairment, cognitive, motor and behavioural outcomes for children born very preterm.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were searched for articles between 1 January 1990 and 29 April 2024 reporting on a representative, prospective geographical, network-based or multisite cohorts of children born <32 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Neurodevelopmental impairment, cognitive, motor and emotional-behavioural functioning in children aged 36 months to 18 years. Data were extracted and reported descriptively due to heterogeneity in study measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 18 012 records, 29 studies from 16 cohorts were included. Brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, male sex and lower socioeconomic status were the most consistent predictors of neurodevelopmental impairment, IQ, working memory, cerebral palsy, fine motor skills and some behavioural measures. Emotional problems were generally not associated with neonatal variables investigated to date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous factors are independently associated with childhood outcomes after being born very preterm, with specific predictors varying across domains of functioning and limited available evidence for some predictor-outcome combinations. Knowledge of these factors may assist in targeting those at highest risk for closer surveillance and early intervention.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022368957.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144991445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parent and practitioner experiences of opt-out consent in neonatal intensive care: a mixed methods study within a trial. 新生儿重症监护中家长和医生选择退出同意的经验:一项试验中的混合方法研究。
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-08-31 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328693
Tracy Mitchell, Izabela Andrzejewska, Cheryl Battersby, Christina Cole, Zoe Daskalopoulou, Jon Dorling, Chris Gale, Michaela Graham, Marie Hubbard, Pollyanna Hardy, Madeleine Hurd, Andrew Robert King, Brett James Manley, David Murray, Elizabeth Nuthall, Heather O'Connor, Shalini Ojha, Calum T Roberts, Amy Rodriquez, Charles Christoph Roehr, Kayleigh Stanbury, Lyvonne Tume, Lauren Young, Kerry Woolfall

Background: In neonatal trials, verbal opt-out consent has been used to reduce burden on families and make recruitment more efficient and representative. It involves information provision through posters and leaflets before randomisation, and parents can verbally 'opt out' of their baby being randomised to the trial. There is limited understanding of how opt-out consent is operationalised in a multicentre neonatal trial, and its acceptability to staff and parents.

Objective: To explore views and experiences of verbal opt-out consent in neoGASTRIC, a neonatal randomised trial comparing routine and no routine measurements of gastric contents in preterm babies.

Methods: A mixed methods (questionnaires, interviews and focus groups) process evaluation within a trial.

Setting: Four UK neonatal units.

Participants: 253 participants: 167 staff (149 questionnaires; 18 across two focus groups), 86 parents (85 questionnaires; 15 interviews; 14 took part in both).

Results: Parents and staff supported opt-out consent in neoGASTRIC as interventions were viewed as low risk and non-invasive. Parents appreciated an appropriately timed research conversation; only 21% noticed study information banners/posters. Operationalisation of opt-out consent varied in terms of when information was provided and randomisation timing. Women approached during labour or within hours of birth reported feeling overwhelmed and lacking capacity to consider research. Some staff operationalised a modified opt-in approach.

Conclusions: An appropriately timed verbal opt-out approach to consent was seen acceptable as proportionate in the neonatal context in a low-risk trial comparing different accepted clinical, non-pharmaceutical, practices. Findings informed neoGASTRIC and will guide approaches to consent in this setting.

背景:在新生儿试验中,口头选择退出同意已被用于减轻家庭负担,使招募更有效率和代表性。它包括在随机分配之前通过海报和传单提供信息,父母可以口头“选择退出”他们的孩子被随机分配到试验中。对于选择退出同意在多中心新生儿试验中是如何运作的,以及工作人员和家长对其可接受性的理解有限。目的:探讨新生儿随机试验neoGASTRIC中口头选择退出同意的观点和经验,该试验比较了早产儿常规和非常规胃内容物测量。方法:采用混合方法(问卷调查、访谈和焦点小组)在试验中进行评价。环境:四个英国新生儿病房。参与者:253名参与者;167名工作人员(149份问卷;18份来自两个焦点小组);86名家长(85份问卷;15份访谈;14份同时参与)。结果:家长和工作人员支持neoGASTRIC的选择退出同意,因为干预措施被认为是低风险和无创的。家长们喜欢在适当的时间进行研究谈话;只有21%的人注意到研究信息横幅/海报。选择退出同意的操作在提供信息的时间和随机化时间方面有所不同。在分娩期间或分娩数小时内接近的妇女报告说,她们感到不知所措,缺乏考虑研究的能力。一些工作人员采用了修改后的选择加入办法。结论:在一项低风险试验中,比较不同的可接受的临床非药物实践,在新生儿背景下,适当的时间口头选择退出方法被认为是可接受的。研究结果为neoGASTRIC提供了信息,并将指导这种情况下的同意方法。
{"title":"Parent and practitioner experiences of opt-out consent in neonatal intensive care: a mixed methods study within a trial.","authors":"Tracy Mitchell, Izabela Andrzejewska, Cheryl Battersby, Christina Cole, Zoe Daskalopoulou, Jon Dorling, Chris Gale, Michaela Graham, Marie Hubbard, Pollyanna Hardy, Madeleine Hurd, Andrew Robert King, Brett James Manley, David Murray, Elizabeth Nuthall, Heather O'Connor, Shalini Ojha, Calum T Roberts, Amy Rodriquez, Charles Christoph Roehr, Kayleigh Stanbury, Lyvonne Tume, Lauren Young, Kerry Woolfall","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In neonatal trials, verbal opt-out consent has been used to reduce burden on families and make recruitment more efficient and representative. It involves information provision through posters and leaflets before randomisation, and parents can verbally 'opt out' of their baby being randomised to the trial. There is limited understanding of how opt-out consent is operationalised in a multicentre neonatal trial, and its acceptability to staff and parents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore views and experiences of verbal opt-out consent in neoGASTRIC, a neonatal randomised trial comparing routine and no routine measurements of gastric contents in preterm babies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods (questionnaires, interviews and focus groups) process evaluation within a trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four UK neonatal units.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>253 participants: 167 staff (149 questionnaires; 18 across two focus groups), 86 parents (85 questionnaires; 15 interviews; 14 took part in both).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents and staff supported opt-out consent in neoGASTRIC as interventions were viewed as low risk and non-invasive. Parents appreciated an appropriately timed research conversation; only 21% noticed study information banners/posters. Operationalisation of opt-out consent varied in terms of when information was provided and randomisation timing. Women approached during labour or within hours of birth reported feeling overwhelmed and lacking capacity to consider research. Some staff operationalised a modified opt-in approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An appropriately timed verbal opt-out approach to consent was seen acceptable as proportionate in the neonatal context in a low-risk trial comparing different accepted clinical, non-pharmaceutical, practices. Findings informed neoGASTRIC and will guide approaches to consent in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should we abandon ARA and DHA supplementation in preterm infants? 我们应该放弃对早产儿补充ARA和DHA吗?
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328746
Wolfgang Bernhard, Axel R Franz, Christian F Poets
{"title":"Should we abandon ARA and DHA supplementation in preterm infants?","authors":"Wolfgang Bernhard, Axel R Franz, Christian F Poets","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does whole-body in-utero MRI in those with suspected fetal abnormalities improve antenatal care? A single-centre retrospective cohort study. 怀疑胎儿异常的全身子宫内MRI是否能改善产前护理?单中心回顾性队列研究。
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-328547
Hang Cheong Derek Ng, Christopher Harris, Victoria Stern, Anthony R Hart, Elspeth Helen Whitby

Objective: To determine whether full body in-utero MRI (iuMRI) rather than targeted imaging adds useful clinical information when a fetal anomaly is suspected in the brain or the body.

Design: Single-centre retrospective cohort study, from October 2011 to May 2022.

Setting: Regional fetal MRI service in Sheffield, UK.

Patients: All pregnant people undergoing iuMRI.

Interventions: iuMRI of the brain and body was reviewed by a fetal radiologist, and the results discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

Main outcome measures: Additional abnormalities detected on iuMRI outside of the initial area of interest on ultrasound.

Results: 1876 participants: 916 participants had a fetus with brain anomalies only on ultrasound, of which 12 (1.3%) had additional body abnormalities on iuMRI. 960 participants had body anomalies only on ultrasound, of whom 8 (0.8%) had an additional brain abnormality. The additional findings from 12 cases (0.6% of whole cohort) added useful clinical information to guide care or counselling.

Conclusion: If brain or body anomalies are found on ultrasound in the fetus, whole-body iuMRI reveals additional abnormalities in a small number of cases. However, these may provide important information that changes counselling or care. Further research is required to determine how significant this impact is for clinicians and families, whether normal findings reassure families, how long whole-body iuMRI adds to the MRI acquisition time and the health economics implications.

目的:确定当怀疑胎儿在大脑或身体中出现异常时,全身子宫内MRI (iuMRI)是否比靶向成像更能提供有用的临床信息。设计:单中心回顾性队列研究,时间为2011年10月至2022年5月。设置:区域胎儿MRI服务在谢菲尔德,英国。患者:所有接受iuMRI的孕妇。干预措施:由胎儿放射科医生审查脑和身体的iuMRI,并由多学科小组讨论结果。主要结果测量:在超声检查的初始感兴趣区域之外,在iuMRI上检测到额外的异常。结果:1876名参与者:916名参与者的胎儿仅在超声上有脑异常,其中12名(1.3%)参与者在iuMRI上有额外的身体异常。960名参与者仅在超声上有身体异常,其中8人(0.8%)有额外的大脑异常。来自12例(占整个队列的0.6%)的额外发现增加了有用的临床信息,以指导护理或咨询。结论:如果超声检查发现胎儿脑或身体异常,在少数情况下,全身iuMRI显示额外的异常。然而,这些可能提供改变咨询或护理的重要信息。需要进一步的研究来确定这种影响对临床医生和家庭有多重要,正常的发现是否让家庭放心,全身iuMRI增加了MRI获取时间的多长时间以及健康经济学意义。
{"title":"Does whole-body in-utero MRI in those with suspected fetal abnormalities improve antenatal care? A single-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hang Cheong Derek Ng, Christopher Harris, Victoria Stern, Anthony R Hart, Elspeth Helen Whitby","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328547","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether full body in-utero MRI (iuMRI) rather than targeted imaging adds useful clinical information when a fetal anomaly is suspected in the brain or the body.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre retrospective cohort study, from October 2011 to May 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional fetal MRI service in Sheffield, UK.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All pregnant people undergoing iuMRI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>iuMRI of the brain and body was reviewed by a fetal radiologist, and the results discussed by a multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Additional abnormalities detected on iuMRI outside of the initial area of interest on ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1876 participants: 916 participants had a fetus with brain anomalies only on ultrasound, of which 12 (1.3%) had additional body abnormalities on iuMRI. 960 participants had body anomalies only on ultrasound, of whom 8 (0.8%) had an additional brain abnormality. The additional findings from 12 cases (0.6% of whole cohort) added useful clinical information to guide care or counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If brain or body anomalies are found on ultrasound in the fetus, whole-body iuMRI reveals additional abnormalities in a small number of cases. However, these may provide important information that changes counselling or care. Further research is required to determine how significant this impact is for clinicians and families, whether normal findings reassure families, how long whole-body iuMRI adds to the MRI acquisition time and the health economics implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving outcomes for very preterm babies in England: does place of birth matter? Findings from OPTI-PREM, a national cohort study. 改善英国早产儿的预后:出生地重要吗?OPTI-PREM是一项全国性队列研究。
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327474
Thillagavathie Pillay, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Victor Banda, Helen Campbell, Kelvin Dawson, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, Neena Modi, Elaine M Boyle, Oliver Rivero-Arias

Objective: Babies born between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks of gestation contribute substantially towards infant mortality and morbidity. In England, their care is delivered in maternity services colocated with highly specialised neonatal intensive care units (NICU) or less specialised local neonatal units (LNU). We investigated whether birth setting offered survival and/or morbidity advantages to inform National Health Service delivery.

Design: Retrospective national cohort study.

Setting: LNU, NICU, England.

Patients: UK National Neonatal Research Database whole population data for births between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks of gestation, discharged from/died within neonatal units between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We linked baby-level data to mortality information from the Office for National Statistics.

Outcome measures: Death during neonatal care, up to 1 year (infant mortality), surgically treated necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury (SBI), bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Intervention: Birth in NICU versus LNU setting. We used an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between the nearest NICU and LNU) estimation approach to determine treatment effect.

Results: Of 18 847 babies (NICU: 10 379; LNU: 8468), 574 died in NICU/LNU care, and 121 postdischarge (infant mortality 3.7%). We found no effect of birth setting on neonatal or infant mortality. Significantly more babies born into LNU settings experienced SBI (mean difference -1.1% (99% CI -2.2% to -0.1%)). This was attenuated after excluding births at 27 weeks, and early postnatal transfers.

Conclusions: In England, LNU teams should use clinical judgement, risk assessing benefits of transfer versus risk of SBI for preterm births at 27 weeks of gestation. 28 weeks of gestation is a safe threshold for preterm birth in either NICU/LNU settings.

Trial registration number: NCT02994849/ISRCTN74230187.

目的:妊娠27+0至31+6周出生的婴儿对婴儿死亡率和发病率有重要影响。在英格兰,他们的护理是在产科服务中提供的,与高度专业化的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)或不太专业的地方新生儿病房(lu)配合使用。我们调查了是否出生环境提供生存和/或发病率优势,以告知国家卫生服务提供。设计:回顾性国家队列研究。单位:英国LNU, NICU。患者:英国国家新生儿研究数据库2014年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间出生在妊娠27+0至31+6周之间、从新生儿病房出院/死亡的全人群数据。我们将婴儿水平的数据与国家统计局的死亡率信息联系起来。结局指标:新生儿护理期间死亡,最多1年(婴儿死亡率),手术治疗的坏死性小肠结肠炎,早产儿视网膜病变,严重脑损伤(SBI),支气管肺发育不良。干预:新生儿重症监护病房与新生儿重症监护病房的对比。我们使用工具变量(产妇在最近的NICU和LNU之间的额外旅行时间)估计方法来确定治疗效果。结果:18847例新生儿(NICU: 10379例;新生儿重症监护病房:8468人),574人在新生儿重症监护病房/新生儿重症监护病房死亡,121人在出院后死亡(婴儿死亡率3.7%)。我们没有发现出生环境对新生儿或婴儿死亡率的影响。在lu环境中出生的婴儿明显更多地经历了SBI(平均差异-1.1% (99% CI -2.2%至-0.1%))。在排除27周分娩和早期产后转移后,这种情况有所减弱。结论:在英国,LNU团队应该使用临床判断,风险评估转移的益处与27周妊娠早产儿SBI的风险。无论是NICU还是lu,妊娠28周都是早产的安全阈值。试验注册号:NCT02994849/ISRCTN74230187。
{"title":"Improving outcomes for very preterm babies in England: does place of birth matter? Findings from OPTI-PREM, a national cohort study.","authors":"Thillagavathie Pillay, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Victor Banda, Helen Campbell, Kelvin Dawson, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, Neena Modi, Elaine M Boyle, Oliver Rivero-Arias","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327474","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Babies born between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation contribute substantially towards infant mortality and morbidity. In England, their care is delivered in maternity services colocated with highly specialised neonatal intensive care units (NICU) or less specialised local neonatal units (LNU). We investigated whether birth setting offered survival and/or morbidity advantages to inform National Health Service delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective national cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>LNU, NICU, England.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>UK National Neonatal Research Database whole population data for births between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation, discharged from/died within neonatal units between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We linked baby-level data to mortality information from the Office for National Statistics.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Death during neonatal care, up to 1 year (infant mortality), surgically treated necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury (SBI), bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Birth in NICU versus LNU setting. We used an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between the nearest NICU and LNU) estimation approach to determine treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 847 babies (NICU: 10 379; LNU: 8468), 574 died in NICU/LNU care, and 121 postdischarge (infant mortality 3.7%). We found no effect of birth setting on neonatal or infant mortality. Significantly more babies born into LNU settings experienced SBI (mean difference -1.1% (99% CI -2.2% to -0.1%)). This was attenuated after excluding births at 27 weeks, and early postnatal transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In England, LNU teams should use clinical judgement, risk assessing benefits of transfer versus risk of SBI for preterm births at 27 weeks of gestation. 28 weeks of gestation is a safe threshold for preterm birth in either NICU/LNU settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02994849/ISRCTN74230187.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"444-451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142891504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cerebral injury and long-term neurodevelopment impairment in children following severe fetomaternal transfusion: a retrospective cohort study. 严重母婴输血后儿童脑损伤和长期神经发育障碍:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328135
Salma El Emrani, Marie-Louise van der Hoorn, Ratna N G B Tan, Sylke J Steggerda, Linda S de Vries, Monique C Haak, Jeanine M M van Klink, Masja de Haas, Lotte E van der Meeren, Enrico Lopriore

Objective: Fetomaternal transfusion (FMT) is associated with increased perinatal mortality and morbidity, but data on postnatal outcomes are scarce. Our aim was to determine the incidence of adverse short-termand long-term sequelae of severe FMT.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Dutch tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients: Liveborn neonates with FMT admitted in 2017-2022.

Main outcome measures: Severe FMT was defined as ≥30 mL of fetal red blood cells in the maternal circulation diagnosed with positive Kleihauer-Betke/flow cytometry test. Adverse outcomes were compared between severe and mild FMT (10-30 mL blood loss) to highlight the impact of FMT severity. Primary outcome was an adverse composite outcome consisting of neonatal mortality or severe neurological morbidity (ie, severe cerebral injury and/or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 2 years). Secondary outcome was perinatal asphyxia.

Results: 109 neonates with FMT were included, 16 with severe FMT and 93 with mild FMT. Neonatal mortality occurred in 19% (3/16) of neonates with severe FMT and in 4% (4/93) with mild FMT (p=0.063). Perinatal asphyxia was diagnosed in 25% (4/16) of neonates with severe FMT compared with 6% (6/93) with mild FMT (p=0.038). Long-term outcome was assessed in 60 neonates. NDI occurred in 22% (2/9) of children with severe FMT compared with 16% (8/51) with mild FMT (p=0.637). Adverse outcome occurred in 43% (95% CI 38 to 50%) of neonates with severe FMT compared with 18% (95% CI 17% to 24%) with mild FMT (p=0.074).

Conclusion: Neonatal mortality or long-term neurological morbidity occurred in 38%-50% of children with fetal blood loss and anaemia due to severe FMT.

目的:胎母输血(FMT)与围产期死亡率和发病率增加有关,但有关产后结局的数据很少。我们的目的是确定严重FMT的不良短期和长期后遗症的发生率。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:荷兰三级新生儿重症监护病房。患者:2017-2022年住院的FMT活产新生儿。主要观察指标:重度FMT定义为经Kleihauer-Betke/流式细胞术检测阳性的母体循环中胎儿红细胞≥30 mL。比较严重和轻度FMT (10- 30ml失血)的不良结局,以突出FMT严重程度的影响。主要转归是由新生儿死亡率或严重神经系统疾病(即2岁时严重脑损伤和/或神经发育障碍(NDI))组成的不良综合转归。次要结局为围产期窒息。结果:109例新生儿FMT,其中重度FMT 16例,轻度FMT 93例。重度FMT患儿死亡率为19%(3/16),轻度FMT患儿死亡率为4% (4/93)(p=0.063)。重度FMT患儿围生期窒息发生率为25%(4/16),轻度FMT患儿为6% (6/93)(p=0.038)。对60名新生儿的长期预后进行了评估。重度FMT患儿的NDI发生率为22%(2/9),而轻度FMT患儿的NDI发生率为16% (8/51)(p=0.637)。重度FMT新生儿的不良结局发生率为43% (95% CI 38 ~ 50%),轻度FMT为18% (95% CI 17% ~ 24%) (p=0.074)。结论:严重FMT所致胎儿失血和贫血患儿的新生儿死亡率或长期神经系统疾病发生率为38%-50%。
{"title":"Cerebral injury and long-term neurodevelopment impairment in children following severe fetomaternal transfusion: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Salma El Emrani, Marie-Louise van der Hoorn, Ratna N G B Tan, Sylke J Steggerda, Linda S de Vries, Monique C Haak, Jeanine M M van Klink, Masja de Haas, Lotte E van der Meeren, Enrico Lopriore","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-328135","DOIUrl":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-328135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetomaternal transfusion (FMT) is associated with increased perinatal mortality and morbidity, but data on postnatal outcomes are scarce. Our aim was to determine the incidence of adverse short-termand long-term sequelae of severe FMT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dutch tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Liveborn neonates with FMT admitted in 2017-2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Severe FMT was defined as ≥30 mL of fetal red blood cells in the maternal circulation diagnosed with positive Kleihauer-Betke/flow cytometry test. Adverse outcomes were compared between severe and mild FMT (10-30 mL blood loss) to highlight the impact of FMT severity. Primary outcome was an adverse composite outcome consisting of neonatal mortality or severe neurological morbidity (ie, severe cerebral injury and/or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 2 years). Secondary outcome was perinatal asphyxia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>109 neonates with FMT were included, 16 with severe FMT and 93 with mild FMT. Neonatal mortality occurred in 19% (3/16) of neonates with severe FMT and in 4% (4/93) with mild FMT (p=0.063). Perinatal asphyxia was diagnosed in 25% (4/16) of neonates with severe FMT compared with 6% (6/93) with mild FMT (p=0.038). Long-term outcome was assessed in 60 neonates. NDI occurred in 22% (2/9) of children with severe FMT compared with 16% (8/51) with mild FMT (p=0.637). Adverse outcome occurred in 43% (95% CI 38 to 50%) of neonates with severe FMT compared with 18% (95% CI 17% to 24%) with mild FMT (p=0.074).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal mortality or long-term neurological morbidity occurred in 38%-50% of children with fetal blood loss and anaemia due to severe FMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"473-478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143051001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1