Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-18568-z
Omar A Zaki, Raja R Narayan, Rami Srouji, Thomas Boerner, Kenneth Seier, Mithat Gönen, Louise C Connell, Andrea Cercek, Nancy E Kemeny, Vinod P Balachandran, Jeffrey A Drebin, Kevin C Soares, T Peter Kingham, Alice C Wei, William R Jarnagin, Michael I D'Angelica
Background: Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy improves hepatic recurrence rates and survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the adjuvant setting. Dose reductions of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) are common due to hepatotoxicity. The impact of these dose adjustments on patient outcomes is unclear.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent adjuvant HAI pump placement for CRLM between January 2000 and October 2017. The study enrolled only patients intended to receive six cycles of FUDR. Hepatic recurrence and overall survival (OS) were correlated with the number of FUDR cycles and dose density, defined as the actual FUDR dose received divided by the expected total during six cycles.
Results: The study identified 344 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these 344 patients, 173 received up to four cycles of FUDR and 171 received > 4 cycles. The median dose density was 0.42 (range, 0.17-1.13). Competing risk analysis of the two groups showed no difference in risk for liver recurrence (p = 0.357). Neither the cycles of FUDR received (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.237) nor the FUDR dose density (HR, 1.26; p = 0.631) was associated with hepatic recurrence in the univariable analysis. Dose density was not associated with improved OS (HR, 1.35; p = 0.486), although in the multivariable analysis, increased FUDR cycles were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.86; p = 0.005).
Conclusions: In adjuvant HAI therapy for CRLM, neither the number of FUDR cycles nor the dose density of FUDR is associated with hepatic recurrence.
背景:肝动脉输注(HAI)化疗可提高结肠直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的肝脏复发率和生存率。由于肝毒性,HAI氟尿定(FUDR)的剂量减少是常见的。这些剂量调整对患者预后的影响尚不清楚。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2000年1月至2017年10月期间接受辅助HAI泵置入治疗CRLM的患者。该研究只招募了打算接受6个周期FUDR的患者。肝脏复发和总生存期(OS)与FUDR周期数和剂量密度相关,剂量密度定义为6个周期内实际接受的FUDR剂量除以预期的总剂量。结果:该研究确定了344例符合纳入标准的患者。在这344例患者中,173例接受了4个周期的FUDR治疗,171例接受了4个周期的FUDR治疗。中位剂量密度为0.42(范围0.17-1.13)。两组的竞争风险分析显示肝脏复发风险无差异(p = 0.357)。在单变量分析中,所接受的FUDR周期(风险比[HR], 0.93; p = 0.237)和FUDR剂量密度(风险比[HR], 1.26; p = 0.631)均与肝脏复发无关。虽然在多变量分析中,增加的FUDR周期与改善的OS相关(HR, 0.86, p = 0.005),但剂量密度与改善的OS无关(HR, 1.35; p = 0.486)。结论:在CRLM的辅助HAI治疗中,FUDR周期数和FUDR剂量密度与肝脏复发无关。
{"title":"Hepatic Recurrence Rate Based on Extent of Adjuvant Floxuridine Exposure After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.","authors":"Omar A Zaki, Raja R Narayan, Rami Srouji, Thomas Boerner, Kenneth Seier, Mithat Gönen, Louise C Connell, Andrea Cercek, Nancy E Kemeny, Vinod P Balachandran, Jeffrey A Drebin, Kevin C Soares, T Peter Kingham, Alice C Wei, William R Jarnagin, Michael I D'Angelica","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18568-z","DOIUrl":"10.1245/s10434-025-18568-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy improves hepatic recurrence rates and survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the adjuvant setting. Dose reductions of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) are common due to hepatotoxicity. The impact of these dose adjustments on patient outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent adjuvant HAI pump placement for CRLM between January 2000 and October 2017. The study enrolled only patients intended to receive six cycles of FUDR. Hepatic recurrence and overall survival (OS) were correlated with the number of FUDR cycles and dose density, defined as the actual FUDR dose received divided by the expected total during six cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 344 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these 344 patients, 173 received up to four cycles of FUDR and 171 received > 4 cycles. The median dose density was 0.42 (range, 0.17-1.13). Competing risk analysis of the two groups showed no difference in risk for liver recurrence (p = 0.357). Neither the cycles of FUDR received (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.237) nor the FUDR dose density (HR, 1.26; p = 0.631) was associated with hepatic recurrence in the univariable analysis. Dose density was not associated with improved OS (HR, 1.35; p = 0.486), although in the multivariable analysis, increased FUDR cycles were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.86; p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adjuvant HAI therapy for CRLM, neither the number of FUDR cycles nor the dose density of FUDR is associated with hepatic recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1490-1502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Standard treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) involves major hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy and biliary-enteric reconstruction (Ann Surg. 258:129-140; Ann Surg Oncol. 29:6759-6771). Some patients may develop recurrence or second primary malignancies involving the intrapancreatic bile duct (J Am Coll Surg. 221:1041-1049; Surgery. 163:732-738). In selected cases, re-resection including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may offer a valuable treatment option (Ann Surg. 262:121-129). However, reports of PD following prior PHCC surgery are extremely limited, and the technical aspects have not been systematically described (J Gastrointest Surg. 2015:19(12):2138-2145; J Med Case Rep. 2016:10(1):299).
Methods: Between January 2012 and May 2025, five patients underwent PD after previous PHCC surgery. Operative videos and records were reviewed to assess characteristic technical elements, including adhesiolysis around the hepaticojejunostomy, mesenteric dissection with preservation of the jejunal limb blood supply, and complex reconstruction strategies. Postoperative outcomes were collected from medical records. Based on these data, we evaluated the technical feasibility of PD in this setting and proposed a classification of reconstruction patterns.
Results: PD was successfully completed in all five cases. The median operative time was 463 minutes, and the median blood loss was 1155 mL. No complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher occurred. The original hepaticojejunostomy was preserved in all cases. In four cases, the existing afferent limb was used for pancreaticojejunostomy (Child or Whipple type). In the remaining case, a new elevated jejunal limb was created for double-tract reconstruction.
Conclusion: PD after prior PHCC surgery is technically feasible and can be safely performed. The proposed classification, along with the surgical video, may provide practical guidance for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making (see supplementary Figure 1).
背景:肝门周围胆管癌(PHCC)的标准治疗包括主要肝切除术合并尾状叶切除术和胆道-肠重建(Ann surgery . 258:129-140; Ann surgical Oncol. 29:6759-6771)。部分患者可复发或发生累及胰内胆管的第二原发恶性肿瘤(中华外科杂志。221:1041-1049;外科杂志。163:732-738)。在某些情况下,包括胰十二指肠切除术(PD)在内的再切除可能是一种有价值的治疗选择(Ann Surg. 262:121-129)。然而,先前PHCC手术后PD的报道非常有限,技术方面也没有系统的描述(J Gastrointest surgery . 2015:19(12):2138-2145;中华医学杂志,2016,10(1):299。方法:2012年1月至2025年5月,5例患者在既往PHCC手术后接受PD治疗。我们回顾了手术视频和记录,以评估特征性的技术要素,包括肝空肠吻合术周围粘连松解,肠系膜剥离以保留空肠肢体血液供应,以及复杂的重建策略。从医疗记录中收集术后结果。基于这些数据,我们评估了PD在这种情况下的技术可行性,并提出了重建模式的分类。结果:5例患者均成功完成PD。中位手术时间463分钟,中位失血量1155 mL,无Clavien-Dindo III级及以上并发症发生。所有病例均保留原肝空肠吻合术。其中4例采用患儿或Whipple型的现有输入肢行胰空肠吻合。在其余的病例中,一个新的空肠肢体被创建用于双道重建。结论:先前PHCC手术后PD在技术上是可行的,可以安全进行。所提出的分类以及手术视频可以为术前计划和术中决策提供实用指导(见补充图1)。
{"title":"Surgical Technique and Feasibility of Pancreaticoduodenectomy after Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Kota Sugiura, Atsushi Oba, Mamiko Miyashita, Hayato Baba, Ryota Ito, Gaku Shimane, Yui Sawa, Hiroyuki Shibata, Sho Kiritani, Kosuke Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yosuke Inoue, Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18571-4","DOIUrl":"10.1245/s10434-025-18571-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) involves major hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy and biliary-enteric reconstruction (Ann Surg. 258:129-140; Ann Surg Oncol. 29:6759-6771). Some patients may develop recurrence or second primary malignancies involving the intrapancreatic bile duct (J Am Coll Surg. 221:1041-1049; Surgery. 163:732-738). In selected cases, re-resection including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may offer a valuable treatment option (Ann Surg. 262:121-129). However, reports of PD following prior PHCC surgery are extremely limited, and the technical aspects have not been systematically described (J Gastrointest Surg. 2015:19(12):2138-2145; J Med Case Rep. 2016:10(1):299).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2012 and May 2025, five patients underwent PD after previous PHCC surgery. Operative videos and records were reviewed to assess characteristic technical elements, including adhesiolysis around the hepaticojejunostomy, mesenteric dissection with preservation of the jejunal limb blood supply, and complex reconstruction strategies. Postoperative outcomes were collected from medical records. Based on these data, we evaluated the technical feasibility of PD in this setting and proposed a classification of reconstruction patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PD was successfully completed in all five cases. The median operative time was 463 minutes, and the median blood loss was 1155 mL. No complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher occurred. The original hepaticojejunostomy was preserved in all cases. In four cases, the existing afferent limb was used for pancreaticojejunostomy (Child or Whipple type). In the remaining case, a new elevated jejunal limb was created for double-tract reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD after prior PHCC surgery is technically feasible and can be safely performed. The proposed classification, along with the surgical video, may provide practical guidance for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making (see supplementary Figure 1).</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1538-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-23DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-18798-1
Paul C M Andel, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, I Quintus Molenaar, Lois A Daamen, Vincent P Groot
{"title":"ASO Author Reflections: The Impact of Perioperative Treatment on Recurrence Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer.","authors":"Paul C M Andel, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, I Quintus Molenaar, Lois A Daamen, Vincent P Groot","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18798-1","DOIUrl":"10.1245/s10434-025-18798-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1642-1643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2
Jawon Hwang, Ki-Yoon Kim, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung
Background: Previous studies have validated the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer, but the feasibility of applying MIS to treat Borrmann type IV gastric cancer remains unclear. Given its distinct clinicopathological features, poor prognosis, and technical complexities in surgery, further investigation is needed. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between open surgery and MIS in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1025 patients who underwent open (n = 888) or minimally invasive (n = 137) gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups.
Results: After propensity score matching, each group included 112 matched patients. The MIS group had longer operative times (p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) than the open surgery group. Other perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences. Overall and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.741 and p = 0.707, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratios for death and recurrence following MIS compared with open surgery were 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.85, p = 0.396) and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.79, p = 0.308), respectively.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that MIS for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer may offer long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those with open surgery while preserving the inherent benefits of MIS.
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Borrmann Type IV Gastric Cancer: An Oncologically Sound Alternative to Open Surgery.","authors":"Jawon Hwang, Ki-Yoon Kim, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2","DOIUrl":"10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have validated the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer, but the feasibility of applying MIS to treat Borrmann type IV gastric cancer remains unclear. Given its distinct clinicopathological features, poor prognosis, and technical complexities in surgery, further investigation is needed. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between open surgery and MIS in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 1025 patients who underwent open (n = 888) or minimally invasive (n = 137) gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, each group included 112 matched patients. The MIS group had longer operative times (p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) than the open surgery group. Other perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences. Overall and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.741 and p = 0.707, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratios for death and recurrence following MIS compared with open surgery were 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.85, p = 0.396) and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.79, p = 0.308), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that MIS for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer may offer long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those with open surgery while preserving the inherent benefits of MIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1350-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145306877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}