首页 > 最新文献

Annals Of Work Exposures and Health最新文献

英文 中文
Recommended flow rate of the aluminum cyclone for improved exposure assessment. 改进暴露评估的铝旋流器推荐流量。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf075
Sena Yang, Martin Harper, Emanuele Cauda, Taekhee Lee

Samples of the respirable fraction of airborne particles to which workers are exposed are an important component of many health protection programs, especially in those workplaces where there is a risk of health problems from exposure to respirable crystalline silica. The most common technique for size-selection of the respirable dust fraction is to use a miniature cyclone preselector, many of which are based on the "Higgens-Dewell" (HD) design. A variant of the HD cyclone, commonly referred to as the "aluminum (or aluminium) cyclone," was developed in Scandinavia. Early work showed that a flow rate of 2.2 l min-1 would be appropriate to meet the size-separation convention standardized under the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), while a later, non-peer-reviewed study suggested 2.5 l min-1 and this flow rate is currently recommended by the manufacturers. The International Sampler Comparison Group is working on revising the European Standard EN13205 on sampler performance testing for consideration as an ISO standard. In this work, 5 aluminum cyclone units were tested at 2.5 l min-1 and the cyclones were further tested at 2.3 and 2.2 l min-1 to determine the optimal flow rate. While the flow rate of 2.3 l min-1 had the lowest overall mean bias, a flow rate of 2.2 l min-1 gave bias <±10% over the whole area of size distributions of interest. This supports earlier findings and suggests that 2.2 l min-1 is the most accurate flow rate for sampling with the aluminum cyclone. However, 2.3 l min-1 also meets the specification of EN13205 in that the area of bias >±10% is minimal. The consequence of continuing to use the aluminum cyclone at 2.5 l min-1 is an underestimate of respirable particles when compared with the ISO convention.

工人接触到的空气中可吸入颗粒的样本是许多健康保护计划的重要组成部分,特别是在那些有暴露于可吸入结晶二氧化硅的健康问题风险的工作场所。可吸入粉尘组分的尺寸选择最常用的技术是使用微型旋风预选器,其中许多是基于“希根斯-德威尔”(HD)设计。HD气旋的一个变体,通常被称为“铝(或铝)气旋”,是在斯堪的纳维亚发展起来的。早期的研究表明,2.2 l min-1的流速适合满足国际标准化组织(ISO)的尺寸分离标准,而后来的一项非同行评审的研究建议2.5 l min-1,这是目前制造商推荐的流速。国际取样器比较小组正在修订取样器性能测试的欧洲标准EN13205,以考虑作为ISO标准。在本工作中,对5个铝制旋风装置进行了2.5 l min-1的试验,并对旋风装置进行了2.3和2.2 l min-1的试验,以确定最佳流量。虽然2.3 l min-1的流量具有最低的总体平均偏差,但2.2 l min-1的流量给偏差±10%是最小的。与ISO公约相比,继续使用2.5 l min-1的铝旋风的后果是低估了可吸入颗粒。
{"title":"Recommended flow rate of the aluminum cyclone for improved exposure assessment.","authors":"Sena Yang, Martin Harper, Emanuele Cauda, Taekhee Lee","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Samples of the respirable fraction of airborne particles to which workers are exposed are an important component of many health protection programs, especially in those workplaces where there is a risk of health problems from exposure to respirable crystalline silica. The most common technique for size-selection of the respirable dust fraction is to use a miniature cyclone preselector, many of which are based on the \"Higgens-Dewell\" (HD) design. A variant of the HD cyclone, commonly referred to as the \"aluminum (or aluminium) cyclone,\" was developed in Scandinavia. Early work showed that a flow rate of 2.2 l min-1 would be appropriate to meet the size-separation convention standardized under the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), while a later, non-peer-reviewed study suggested 2.5 l min-1 and this flow rate is currently recommended by the manufacturers. The International Sampler Comparison Group is working on revising the European Standard EN13205 on sampler performance testing for consideration as an ISO standard. In this work, 5 aluminum cyclone units were tested at 2.5 l min-1 and the cyclones were further tested at 2.3 and 2.2 l min-1 to determine the optimal flow rate. While the flow rate of 2.3 l min-1 had the lowest overall mean bias, a flow rate of 2.2 l min-1 gave bias <±10% over the whole area of size distributions of interest. This supports earlier findings and suggests that 2.2 l min-1 is the most accurate flow rate for sampling with the aluminum cyclone. However, 2.3 l min-1 also meets the specification of EN13205 in that the area of bias >±10% is minimal. The consequence of continuing to use the aluminum cyclone at 2.5 l min-1 is an underestimate of respirable particles when compared with the ISO convention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of Korean CARcinogen EXposure: 2020 update on IARC group 1 carcinogens. 韩国致癌物暴露的发展:国际癌症研究机构1类致癌物的2020年更新。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf079
Dong-Hee Koh, Sangjun Choi, Ju-Hyun Park, Sang-Gil Lee, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Inah Kim, Jeehee Min, Yujin Kim, Jihye Lee, Dong-Uk Park

Objectives: The Korean CARcinogen EXposure (K-CAREX) project previously assessed occupational exposure to 20 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 1 carcinogens in 2010. This study updated K-CAREX to reflect exposure data from 2020.

Methods: We selected 20 IARC Group 1 carcinogens for this update. Reference exposure prevalence estimates were calculated using 3 nationwide occupational databases: the Work Environment Measurement Database (WEMD), the Special Health Examination Database (SHED), and the Work Environment Condition Survey (WECS). Among 37 industrial hygienists from the previous study, 26 participated again, providing exposure estimates after reviewing reference estimates from the 3 data sources. The median of their estimates was used as the final exposure prevalence. The number of exposed workers was calculated by multiplying the final exposure prevalence by the 2020 national census data for each carcinogen and industry. Exposure intensity ratings were also estimated using the WEMD.

Results: Exposure prevalence and the number of exposed workers were estimated for 20 carcinogens across 232 industries. For example, in the "manufacture of basic chemicals" industry, benzene exposure prevalence was estimated at 9%, with 3,833 workers exposed and an exposure intensity rating of 2. The largest exposed population was to welding fumes (266,965 workers), followed by crystalline silica (246,807 workers), nickel (191,258 workers), and mineral oil mist (179,305 workers).

Conclusions: This updated data offers valuable insights into occupational carcinogen exposure, supporting cancer prevention efforts and future epidemiological studies.

目的:韩国致癌物暴露(K-CAREX)项目先前在2010年评估了20种国际癌症研究机构(IARC) 1类致癌物的职业暴露。这项研究更新了K-CAREX,以反映2020年以来的暴露数据。方法:我们选择了20种IARC 1组致癌物进行更新。参考暴露流行率估计值采用3个全国性职业数据库:工作环境测量数据库(WEMD)、特殊健康检查数据库(SHED)和工作环境状况调查(WECS)。在先前研究的37名工业卫生学家中,26名再次参与,在审查了来自3个数据源的参考估计后提供了暴露估计。他们的估计值的中位数被用作最终暴露流行率。暴露工人的数量是通过将最终暴露率乘以每种致癌物和行业的2020年全国人口普查数据来计算的。使用WEMD也估计了暴露强度等级。结果:估计了232个行业中20种致癌物的暴露率和暴露工人人数。例如,在“基础化学品制造”行业,苯暴露率估计为9%,有3,833名工人暴露,暴露强度等级为2。最大的暴露人群是焊接烟雾(266,965名工人),其次是结晶二氧化硅(246,807名工人),镍(191,258名工人)和矿物油雾(179,305名工人)。结论:这一最新数据为职业致癌物暴露提供了有价值的见解,支持癌症预防工作和未来的流行病学研究。
{"title":"Development of Korean CARcinogen EXposure: 2020 update on IARC group 1 carcinogens.","authors":"Dong-Hee Koh, Sangjun Choi, Ju-Hyun Park, Sang-Gil Lee, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Inah Kim, Jeehee Min, Yujin Kim, Jihye Lee, Dong-Uk Park","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Korean CARcinogen EXposure (K-CAREX) project previously assessed occupational exposure to 20 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 1 carcinogens in 2010. This study updated K-CAREX to reflect exposure data from 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 20 IARC Group 1 carcinogens for this update. Reference exposure prevalence estimates were calculated using 3 nationwide occupational databases: the Work Environment Measurement Database (WEMD), the Special Health Examination Database (SHED), and the Work Environment Condition Survey (WECS). Among 37 industrial hygienists from the previous study, 26 participated again, providing exposure estimates after reviewing reference estimates from the 3 data sources. The median of their estimates was used as the final exposure prevalence. The number of exposed workers was calculated by multiplying the final exposure prevalence by the 2020 national census data for each carcinogen and industry. Exposure intensity ratings were also estimated using the WEMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure prevalence and the number of exposed workers were estimated for 20 carcinogens across 232 industries. For example, in the \"manufacture of basic chemicals\" industry, benzene exposure prevalence was estimated at 9%, with 3,833 workers exposed and an exposure intensity rating of 2. The largest exposed population was to welding fumes (266,965 workers), followed by crystalline silica (246,807 workers), nickel (191,258 workers), and mineral oil mist (179,305 workers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated data offers valuable insights into occupational carcinogen exposure, supporting cancer prevention efforts and future epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attitudes of fire service personnel toward respiratory protection in wildland firefighting. 野外消防中消防人员对呼吸防护的态度。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf077
Eden Dawit, Shafaq Naeem, Sophia Vinegar, Laura Styles, Rachael M Jones

Wildland and wildland-urban interface (W/WUI) fires are increasing in frequency and intensity, increasing concerns about firefighters' exposure to hazardous smoke and the need for respiratory protection. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of California fire service personnel on the use of respiratory protective devices (RPDs), particularly powered air-purifying respirators, and a potential Cal/OSHA regulation mandating their use in W/WUI firefighting. Participants were experienced in W/WUI firefighting and had some role in their fire department related to respiratory protection or other aspect of firefighter safety. While all participants recognized the health risks associated with smoke exposure, including cancer and acute respiratory symptoms, and that RPDs would reduce their exposures, participants had concerns that RPDs would negatively affect fatigue, comfort, communication, mobility, and situational awareness. Some concerns specifically relate to the design of the RPDs. Most participants supported using RPDs in specific scenarios such as mop-up and prescribed burns, but fewer supported RPD use during high-exertion tasks like cutting line. Participants preferred flexibility or guidance rather than prescriptive regulation and advocated for engagement of firefighters in the development of any potential regulation to ensure practicality and feasibility. Some participants acknowledged resistance to change in the industry as a barrier for RPD adoption, but felt that evidence of RPD effectiveness and usability, including opportunities for training with devices and changes to device design, could assist with adoption. A programmatic regulation, coupled with education and engagement, can facilitate the incorporation of RPDs in W/WUI firefighting.

荒地和荒地-城市界面(W/WUI)火灾的频率和强度都在增加,这增加了人们对消防员暴露于有害烟雾和呼吸保护需求的关注。本定性研究探讨了加州消防人员对呼吸保护装置(rpd)使用的看法,特别是动力空气净化呼吸器,以及潜在的Cal/OSHA法规要求其在W/WUI消防中使用。参与者具有W/WUI消防经验,并在其消防部门担任呼吸保护或消防员安全其他方面的角色。虽然所有与会者都认识到与烟雾接触有关的健康风险,包括癌症和急性呼吸道症状,并且认识到烟雾接触会减少他们的接触,但与会者担心烟雾接触会对疲劳、舒适、沟通、行动能力和态势感知产生负面影响。有些问题特别与rpd的设计有关。大多数参与者支持在特定情况下使用RPD,如扫射和处方烧伤,但支持在高消耗任务中使用RPD的人较少,如切割线。与会者更喜欢灵活性或指导,而不是规定性的规定,并主张让消防员参与制定任何可能的规定,以确保实用性和可行性。一些与会者承认,行业对变革的抵制是采用RPD的一个障碍,但他们认为,RPD有效性和可用性的证据,包括设备培训的机会和设备设计的变化,可以帮助采用RPD。纲领性规定,加上教育和参与,可以促进将RPDs纳入W/WUI消防。
{"title":"Attitudes of fire service personnel toward respiratory protection in wildland firefighting.","authors":"Eden Dawit, Shafaq Naeem, Sophia Vinegar, Laura Styles, Rachael M Jones","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildland and wildland-urban interface (W/WUI) fires are increasing in frequency and intensity, increasing concerns about firefighters' exposure to hazardous smoke and the need for respiratory protection. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of California fire service personnel on the use of respiratory protective devices (RPDs), particularly powered air-purifying respirators, and a potential Cal/OSHA regulation mandating their use in W/WUI firefighting. Participants were experienced in W/WUI firefighting and had some role in their fire department related to respiratory protection or other aspect of firefighter safety. While all participants recognized the health risks associated with smoke exposure, including cancer and acute respiratory symptoms, and that RPDs would reduce their exposures, participants had concerns that RPDs would negatively affect fatigue, comfort, communication, mobility, and situational awareness. Some concerns specifically relate to the design of the RPDs. Most participants supported using RPDs in specific scenarios such as mop-up and prescribed burns, but fewer supported RPD use during high-exertion tasks like cutting line. Participants preferred flexibility or guidance rather than prescriptive regulation and advocated for engagement of firefighters in the development of any potential regulation to ensure practicality and feasibility. Some participants acknowledged resistance to change in the industry as a barrier for RPD adoption, but felt that evidence of RPD effectiveness and usability, including opportunities for training with devices and changes to device design, could assist with adoption. A programmatic regulation, coupled with education and engagement, can facilitate the incorporation of RPDs in W/WUI firefighting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effectiveness of integrated dust extraction units on hammer drills. 锤钻综合除尘装置的有效性。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf065
Adam Clarke, John Saunders, Kerry Grindle

Drilling is a common task throughout various industry sectors. When holes are drilled in silica-containing materials such as concrete, brick, and stone, respirable dust containing respirable crystalline silica (RCS) can be generated. Prolonged exposure to RCS can lead to silicosis, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Current good control practice includes the application of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) directly to the drills. This is via an external extraction system fitted to a shroud which extracts the dust generated during drilling. For several years, integrated LEV has been available for drills. Integrated LEV offers advantages over external LEV by providing increased portability, interlocked control, reduced trip hazards and reduced costs. However, little is known regarding the control effectiveness of integrated systems. The capture efficiency of 4 different integrated extractors and 1 external extraction system for controlling dust was measured using a real time respirable dust monitor. Furthermore, for 1 drill personal air sampling was conducted to assess the exposure potential to respirable dust from drilling repeatedly into concrete over a 1-h period using no LEV, integrated LEV, and external LEV options. The capture efficiency for respirable dust for 4 integrated drill LEV units ranged between 98.6% and 99.6%. This was comparable to the respirable dust capture efficiency provided by a self-sealing shroud fitted to an external extraction unit which provided efficiencies between 99.4% and 99.8%. The personal exposure testing showed respirable dust exposure was reduced by 87.6% for integrated LEV and 93.3% for external LEV fitted with a self-sealing shroud. The reason for the lower efficiency for the integrated LEV was attributed to dust generated as their dust bins were emptied more often throughout the tests. Given the size of the integrated LEV dust bins and the frequency at which they may require emptying, appropriate control measures to protect workers from dust exposure should be considered-eg emptying the units outdoors in conjunction with RPE.

钻井是各个行业的常见任务。在混凝土、砖、石材等含硅材料中钻孔时,会产生含可呼吸性二氧化硅(RCS)的呼吸性粉尘。长期接触RCS可导致矽肺病、肺癌、慢性阻塞性肺病。目前的良好控制措施包括直接对钻机进行局部排气通风。这是通过安装在防护罩上的外部提取系统来提取钻井过程中产生的粉尘。几年来,集成LEV已经可用于钻井。与外部LEV相比,集成LEV具有更多的便携性、联锁控制、减少行程危险和降低成本等优势。然而,人们对综合系统的控制效果知之甚少。采用实时呼吸性粉尘监测仪,对4种不同的综合除尘系统和1套外部除尘系统的除尘效果进行了测量。此外,对1个钻孔进行了个人空气采样,以评估在1小时内使用无LEV、综合LEV和外部LEV三种方案反复钻孔到混凝土中的可呼吸性粉尘的暴露潜力。4台一体化钻孔LEV机组对呼吸性粉尘的捕获效率在98.6% ~ 99.6%之间。这与安装在外部提取装置上的自密封罩所提供的呼吸性粉尘捕获效率相当,后者的效率在99.4%到99.8%之间。人体暴露试验结果表明,集成式LEV可减少87.6%的呼吸性粉尘暴露量,安装自密封罩的外部LEV可减少93.3%的呼吸性粉尘暴露量。综合LEV效率较低的原因是由于在整个测试过程中,由于其垃圾箱被频繁清空而产生的粉尘。考虑到集成LEV垃圾箱的大小和可能需要排空的频率,应考虑采取适当的控制措施来保护工人免受灰尘的影响——例如,在RPE的同时,将设备排空在室外。
{"title":"The effectiveness of integrated dust extraction units on hammer drills.","authors":"Adam Clarke, John Saunders, Kerry Grindle","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drilling is a common task throughout various industry sectors. When holes are drilled in silica-containing materials such as concrete, brick, and stone, respirable dust containing respirable crystalline silica (RCS) can be generated. Prolonged exposure to RCS can lead to silicosis, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Current good control practice includes the application of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) directly to the drills. This is via an external extraction system fitted to a shroud which extracts the dust generated during drilling. For several years, integrated LEV has been available for drills. Integrated LEV offers advantages over external LEV by providing increased portability, interlocked control, reduced trip hazards and reduced costs. However, little is known regarding the control effectiveness of integrated systems. The capture efficiency of 4 different integrated extractors and 1 external extraction system for controlling dust was measured using a real time respirable dust monitor. Furthermore, for 1 drill personal air sampling was conducted to assess the exposure potential to respirable dust from drilling repeatedly into concrete over a 1-h period using no LEV, integrated LEV, and external LEV options. The capture efficiency for respirable dust for 4 integrated drill LEV units ranged between 98.6% and 99.6%. This was comparable to the respirable dust capture efficiency provided by a self-sealing shroud fitted to an external extraction unit which provided efficiencies between 99.4% and 99.8%. The personal exposure testing showed respirable dust exposure was reduced by 87.6% for integrated LEV and 93.3% for external LEV fitted with a self-sealing shroud. The reason for the lower efficiency for the integrated LEV was attributed to dust generated as their dust bins were emptied more often throughout the tests. Given the size of the integrated LEV dust bins and the frequency at which they may require emptying, appropriate control measures to protect workers from dust exposure should be considered-eg emptying the units outdoors in conjunction with RPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterization of occupational exposure to airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics. 牙科诊所职业暴露于空气微粒和生物气溶胶的特征。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf073
Rubiyat E Islam, Lina Wik, Vibeke E Ansteinsson, Pål Graff, Shan Zienolddiny-Narui, Torunn K Ervik

Occupational exposure to airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics is a potential hazard to dental health workers. Current studies on airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics are limited and methodologically diverse, leaving gaps in the understanding of airborne particles in real-life dental settings. The aim of the study was to investigate the size, concentration, and composition of particles produced during dental procedures, and determine the exposure levels of dental personnel to respirable particles and bioaerosols in dental clinical environments with different characteristics. The study included two conventional dentist offices and one specialty clinic. The number concentration and size distribution of particles released during different dental procedures were monitored in real-time in dental procedure rooms. Personal samplers were used in parallel to collect the respirable and inhalable particle fractions. Total bacterial and total fungal DNA concentrations were quantified in the inhalable particle fraction by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Particle morphology and chemical composition were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The highest geometric mean value of the respirable particle mass concentration (0.06 mg/m3) was below the Norwegian occupational exposure limit for respirable dust of 5 mg/m3. Real-time sampling indicated that particle number concentrations were elevated during working hours in two clinics, with peak levels observed in one clinic coinciding with air polishing activities. The results also showed significant variations in bacterial and fungal DNA concentration levels (P < 0.0001). Many collected particles originated from powders used in dental treatments. Despite low respirable particle mass concentrations, increased levels of ultrafine particles during dental procedures highlight potential health risks to dental professionals. These findings also underscore the importance of advanced ventilation and safety measures to mitigate occupational exposure in dental environments.

牙科诊所的职业暴露于空气中的颗粒和生物气溶胶对牙科卫生工作者是一种潜在的危害。目前在牙科诊所对空气中颗粒和生物气溶胶的研究是有限的,方法多样,在现实生活中的牙科环境中对空气中颗粒的理解留下了空白。本研究的目的是调查牙科手术过程中产生的颗粒的大小、浓度和组成,并确定牙科人员在不同特征的牙科临床环境中对可吸入颗粒和生物气溶胶的暴露水平。这项研究包括两家传统牙医诊所和一家专科诊所。实时监测不同牙科手术过程中释放颗粒的数量、浓度和大小分布。同时使用个人采样器采集可吸入和可吸入颗粒物。采用液滴数字聚合酶链反应定量测定可吸入颗粒组分中细菌和真菌总DNA浓度。用扫描电镜对颗粒形貌和化学成分进行分析。可吸入颗粒物质量浓度最高几何平均值(0.06 mg/m3)低于挪威可吸入粉尘职业暴露限值(5 mg/m3)。实时采样显示,两个诊所的颗粒数浓度在工作时间内升高,其中一个诊所的峰值水平与空气抛光活动一致。结果还显示细菌和真菌DNA浓度水平存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。许多收集到的颗粒来自牙科治疗中使用的粉末。尽管可吸入颗粒物质量浓度较低,但牙科手术过程中超细颗粒物水平的增加凸显了牙科专业人员的潜在健康风险。这些发现也强调了先进的通风和安全措施的重要性,以减轻牙科环境中的职业暴露。
{"title":"Characterization of occupational exposure to airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics.","authors":"Rubiyat E Islam, Lina Wik, Vibeke E Ansteinsson, Pål Graff, Shan Zienolddiny-Narui, Torunn K Ervik","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational exposure to airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics is a potential hazard to dental health workers. Current studies on airborne particles and bioaerosols in dental clinics are limited and methodologically diverse, leaving gaps in the understanding of airborne particles in real-life dental settings. The aim of the study was to investigate the size, concentration, and composition of particles produced during dental procedures, and determine the exposure levels of dental personnel to respirable particles and bioaerosols in dental clinical environments with different characteristics. The study included two conventional dentist offices and one specialty clinic. The number concentration and size distribution of particles released during different dental procedures were monitored in real-time in dental procedure rooms. Personal samplers were used in parallel to collect the respirable and inhalable particle fractions. Total bacterial and total fungal DNA concentrations were quantified in the inhalable particle fraction by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Particle morphology and chemical composition were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The highest geometric mean value of the respirable particle mass concentration (0.06 mg/m3) was below the Norwegian occupational exposure limit for respirable dust of 5 mg/m3. Real-time sampling indicated that particle number concentrations were elevated during working hours in two clinics, with peak levels observed in one clinic coinciding with air polishing activities. The results also showed significant variations in bacterial and fungal DNA concentration levels (P < 0.0001). Many collected particles originated from powders used in dental treatments. Despite low respirable particle mass concentrations, increased levels of ultrafine particles during dental procedures highlight potential health risks to dental professionals. These findings also underscore the importance of advanced ventilation and safety measures to mitigate occupational exposure in dental environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Occupational disease disparities by migration status: comparison of migrant and non-migrant workers in the Australian artificial stone benchtop industry. 移民身份的职业病差异:澳大利亚人造石工作台行业移民和非移民工人的比较。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf063
Stella M Gwini, Ryan F Hoy, Fiona Hore-Lacy, Dunya Tomic, Deborah C Glass, Karen Walker-Bone

Objectives: Studies addressing the epidemiology of silicosis in the artificial stone benchtop industry have shown that this industry includes a large number of migrant workers in Victoria, Australia. The objective of the current analyses was to compare characteristics of migrant workers in the industry with nonmigrant workers.

Methods: Data were derived from artificial stone benchtop workers who had health assessments through a regulator-funded screening program between 2019 and 2024. Migrant workers were defined as workers born outside Australia or had used an interpreter during the assessment. Participant characteristics, lung function, and silicosis prevalence were summarized by migrant status and compared between groups.

Results: There were 1,040 workers (n = 536 migrant workers). Migrant workers were older at assessment than nonmigrant workers (median age 39 versus 33 years, P < 0.001). About 1 quarter of migrant workers used an interpreter (23.8%) and 52% spoke English at home. Silicosis prevalence was higher in migrant compared with nonmigrant workers (23% versus 15%, risk-ratio 1.54, and 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.04) and migrant workers who used an interpreter had double the risk of silicosis than those who did not (46% versus 18%, risk-ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.61 to 3.10). Prelegislative changes, experience of carrying out dry processing was reportedly higher in nonmigrant than migrant workers. Fewer jobs among migrant workers than nonmigrant workers were reported using recommended respirators (44 versus 53%) or ventilation (24% versus 30%).

Conclusions: The risk of silicosis in the artificial stone benchtop industry differed by migration status and was higher among those with lower English language proficiency. As the use of appropriate respirators or ventilation was lower among migrant workers, this suggests the need for improved occupational health and safety practices among migrant workers, making sure the messages are communicated in a manner that is language and culturally appropriate.

目的:针对人造石工作台行业矽肺病流行病学的研究表明,该行业包括澳大利亚维多利亚州的大量移民工人。当前分析的目的是比较该行业中移徙工人与非移徙工人的特征。方法:数据来自2019年至2024年间通过监管机构资助的筛查项目进行健康评估的人造石工作台工人。移民工人被定义为在澳大利亚以外出生或在评估期间使用翻译的工人。根据移民身份总结参与者特征、肺功能和矽肺患病率,并进行组间比较。结果:共有1040名工人(n = 536名农民工)。外来务工人员在评估时比非外来务工人员年龄大(中位年龄39岁比33岁,P < 0.001)。约1 / 4的农民工使用翻译(23.8%),52%的人在家说英语。农民工矽肺病患病率高于非农民工(23%对15%,风险比1.54,95%置信区间1.16至2.04),使用翻译的农民工矽肺病风险是不使用翻译的农民工的两倍(46%对18%,风险比2.24,95%置信区间1.61至3.10)。立法改革前,据报道,非移徙工人进行干法加工的经验高于移徙工人。据报道,使用推荐呼吸器(44比53%)或通气(24%比30%)的农民工比非农民工少。结论:人工石工作台行业矽肺病风险因移民身份而异,英语水平较低者矽肺病风险较高。由于移徙工人中使用适当呼吸器或通风设备的人数较少,这表明需要改进移徙工人的职业健康和安全做法,确保以语言和文化上适当的方式传达这些信息。
{"title":"Occupational disease disparities by migration status: comparison of migrant and non-migrant workers in the Australian artificial stone benchtop industry.","authors":"Stella M Gwini, Ryan F Hoy, Fiona Hore-Lacy, Dunya Tomic, Deborah C Glass, Karen Walker-Bone","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies addressing the epidemiology of silicosis in the artificial stone benchtop industry have shown that this industry includes a large number of migrant workers in Victoria, Australia. The objective of the current analyses was to compare characteristics of migrant workers in the industry with nonmigrant workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from artificial stone benchtop workers who had health assessments through a regulator-funded screening program between 2019 and 2024. Migrant workers were defined as workers born outside Australia or had used an interpreter during the assessment. Participant characteristics, lung function, and silicosis prevalence were summarized by migrant status and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,040 workers (n = 536 migrant workers). Migrant workers were older at assessment than nonmigrant workers (median age 39 versus 33 years, P < 0.001). About 1 quarter of migrant workers used an interpreter (23.8%) and 52% spoke English at home. Silicosis prevalence was higher in migrant compared with nonmigrant workers (23% versus 15%, risk-ratio 1.54, and 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.04) and migrant workers who used an interpreter had double the risk of silicosis than those who did not (46% versus 18%, risk-ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.61 to 3.10). Prelegislative changes, experience of carrying out dry processing was reportedly higher in nonmigrant than migrant workers. Fewer jobs among migrant workers than nonmigrant workers were reported using recommended respirators (44 versus 53%) or ventilation (24% versus 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of silicosis in the artificial stone benchtop industry differed by migration status and was higher among those with lower English language proficiency. As the use of appropriate respirators or ventilation was lower among migrant workers, this suggests the need for improved occupational health and safety practices among migrant workers, making sure the messages are communicated in a manner that is language and culturally appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145399917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and application of a wipe sampling method for detection of antibiotic surface contamination in hospital wards. 医院病房抗生素表面污染检测方法的研制与应用。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf067
Carina A Nilsson, Elizabeth Huynh, Dallal Rashdan, Andreas Tinnert, Maria Hedmer, Monica Kåredal

Background: Antibiotics are handled in large amounts at hospitals at many different wards due to the wide range of bacterial infections that are treated. Unnecessary use and occupational exposure to antibiotics should be avoided due to the risk of bacterial resistance development and adverse health effects including skin and respiratory hypersensitivity reactions in persons handling these drugs.

Objectives: To develop a wipe test method for sampling and quantification of surface contaminations of antibiotics, to assess the current contamination levels in Swedish hospitals, and to propose hygienic guidance values for antibiotics based on these measurements.

Methods: A screening wipe test method and subsequent mass spectrometric analysis of 6 of the most frequently used antibiotics in healthcare was developed and applied in a screening campaign of 16 hospital wards. Wipe tests were sampled from surfaces such as workbenches, floors, storage shelves and handles in medicine rooms, patient rooms, rinsing rooms, utility rooms and corridors.

Results: Antibiotics were detected in most of the samples (cefotaxime 84% positive samples, piperacillin 81%, cloxacillin 65%, metronidazole 53%, ciprofloxacin 20%, and penicillin V 14%). Median values ranged from not detected up to 160 pg/cm2 for the 6 different compounds and the highest results from an individual wipe sample were 27 × 106 pg/cm2 (cefotaxime) and 3.0 × 106 pg/cm2 (piperacillin). For cloxacillin, piperacillin, and metronidazole, lower levels of contamination were observed in medicine rooms when closed systems were used compared with samples collected in rooms where preparations were made without closed systems. Comparison of contamination levels showed that there were significant differences between different surface categories. Out of the most frequently detected antibiotics, ie cloxacillin, piperacillin, and cefotaxime, highest median values were found for surface categories floor and storage whereas lower median values were found for workbenches.

Conclusion: A widespread environmental contamination of antibiotics was observed in hospital wards that potentially can contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as health impacts of exposed personnel. Probable sources include compounding, handling and administration of drug tablets, antibiotic contaminated waste as well as other sources such as excretions from patients and contaminated drug vials. Current surface cleaning routines do not sufficiently reduce spills and leakage regardless of source.

背景:由于所治疗的细菌感染范围广泛,医院在许多不同的病房大量使用抗生素。应避免不必要地使用和职业接触抗生素,因为有可能产生细菌耐药性和不良健康影响,包括处理这些药物的人的皮肤和呼吸过敏反应。目的:开发一种用于抗生素表面污染采样和定量的擦拭试验方法,评估瑞典医院目前的污染水平,并根据这些测量结果提出抗生素的卫生指导值。方法:对医疗保健中6种最常用抗生素的筛查擦拭试验方法和随后的质谱分析进行了开发,并应用于16个医院病房的筛查活动。从工作台、地板、储物架和医疗室、病房、冲洗室、杂物间和走廊的把手等表面取样擦拭测试。结果:绝大多数样品检出抗生素(头孢噻肟阳性84%,哌拉西林阳性81%,氯西林阳性65%,甲硝唑阳性53%,环丙沙星阳性20%,青霉素V阳性14%)。6种不同化合物的中位数从未检测到160 pg/cm2不等,单个擦拭样品的最高结果为27 × 106 pg/cm2(头孢噻肟)和3.0 × 106 pg/cm2(哌拉西林)。对于氯西林、哌拉西林和甲硝唑,在使用封闭系统的药室中,与在不使用封闭系统的药室中收集的样品相比,观察到污染水平较低。污染程度的比较表明,不同表面类别之间存在显著差异。在最常检测到的抗生素中,即氯西林、哌拉西林和头孢噻肟,表面类别、地板和仓库的中位数最高,而工作台的中位数较低。结论:医院病房普遍存在抗生素环境污染,可能导致耐药菌的产生,并对暴露人员的健康造成影响。可能的来源包括药物片剂的配制、处理和给药、抗生素污染的废物以及其他来源,如患者的排泄物和受污染的药瓶。目前的表面清洁程序不足以减少泄漏和泄漏,无论其来源如何。
{"title":"Development and application of a wipe sampling method for detection of antibiotic surface contamination in hospital wards.","authors":"Carina A Nilsson, Elizabeth Huynh, Dallal Rashdan, Andreas Tinnert, Maria Hedmer, Monica Kåredal","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics are handled in large amounts at hospitals at many different wards due to the wide range of bacterial infections that are treated. Unnecessary use and occupational exposure to antibiotics should be avoided due to the risk of bacterial resistance development and adverse health effects including skin and respiratory hypersensitivity reactions in persons handling these drugs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a wipe test method for sampling and quantification of surface contaminations of antibiotics, to assess the current contamination levels in Swedish hospitals, and to propose hygienic guidance values for antibiotics based on these measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A screening wipe test method and subsequent mass spectrometric analysis of 6 of the most frequently used antibiotics in healthcare was developed and applied in a screening campaign of 16 hospital wards. Wipe tests were sampled from surfaces such as workbenches, floors, storage shelves and handles in medicine rooms, patient rooms, rinsing rooms, utility rooms and corridors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antibiotics were detected in most of the samples (cefotaxime 84% positive samples, piperacillin 81%, cloxacillin 65%, metronidazole 53%, ciprofloxacin 20%, and penicillin V 14%). Median values ranged from not detected up to 160 pg/cm2 for the 6 different compounds and the highest results from an individual wipe sample were 27 × 106 pg/cm2 (cefotaxime) and 3.0 × 106 pg/cm2 (piperacillin). For cloxacillin, piperacillin, and metronidazole, lower levels of contamination were observed in medicine rooms when closed systems were used compared with samples collected in rooms where preparations were made without closed systems. Comparison of contamination levels showed that there were significant differences between different surface categories. Out of the most frequently detected antibiotics, ie cloxacillin, piperacillin, and cefotaxime, highest median values were found for surface categories floor and storage whereas lower median values were found for workbenches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A widespread environmental contamination of antibiotics was observed in hospital wards that potentially can contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as health impacts of exposed personnel. Probable sources include compounding, handling and administration of drug tablets, antibiotic contaminated waste as well as other sources such as excretions from patients and contaminated drug vials. Current surface cleaning routines do not sufficiently reduce spills and leakage regardless of source.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using casual inference and machine learning with exposure determinant modeling to identify important workplace controls. 使用随机推理和机器学习与暴露决定因素建模来识别重要的工作场所控制。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf069
Abas Shkembi, Mohammed Abbas Virji, Jie He, Kowit Nambunmee, Pablo Ruiz-Rudolph, Richard L Neitzel

Objectives: Exposure determinant modeling can help industrial hygienists understand where, when, and how to control occupational exposures for their particular work environment. Yet, in practice, the ability to evaluate exposure determinants is degraded by selection bias (where only a subset of all exposed workers is sampled) and the statistical issue of "small n, large p" (few samples but many exposure determinants). This study explored the application of the causal inference framework and machine learning algorithms in exposure determinant modeling using a "small n, large p" example of potential determinants of heavy metal concentrations among informal electronic waste recycling workers.

Methods: As a case study, we used a multivariable logistic regression model to construct inverse probability weights to account for selection bias into a video substudy of 41 of 226 possible workers monitored for exposures to heavy metals. Forty-four determinants of biomarkers (eg tool use, job tasks, and personal protective equipment use) were quantified through video monitoring. Concentrations of heavy metals in blood (Pb and Mn) and urine (Ni and Cu) were sampled. We identified the best-performing biomarker determinant model by comparing the leave-one-out cross-validation root-mean-squared error (LOOCV-RMSE) of 5 models: 2 traditional models (multivariate linear regression and forward selection), and 3 machine learning algorithms (LASSO, boosted regression trees, and random forests). Using the best-performing model, we estimated reductions in heavy metal concentrations through hypothetical workplace controls to identify the most important determinant of biomarker concentrations.

Results: The random forest model had the lowest LOOCV-RMSE and was used as the final biomarker determinant model. Stopping workers from bending their backs while dismantling e-waste was the most important determinant of heavy metal concentrations. Using blood Pb as an example, this translated to an estimated reduction of 0.81 µg/dL (95% confidence interval: 0.66, 0.98) in comparison with maintaining the status quo. Using a traditional regression model (forward selection without inverse probability weights), back bending was not identified as an important determinant of blood Pb.

Discussion: Our causal inference approach with machine learning algorithms overcomes the common limitations of exposure determinant modeling and produces easy-to-interpret estimates of biomarker concentration reductions from hypothetical workplace controls. This can aid industrial hygienists in choosing the most effective hazard controls that can be contextualized to their particular work setting.

目的:暴露决定因素建模可以帮助工业卫生学家了解在何处、何时以及如何控制其特定工作环境的职业暴露。然而,在实践中,评估暴露决定因素的能力因选择偏差(仅对所有暴露工人的一个子集进行抽样)和“小n,大p”的统计问题(样本很少,但暴露决定因素很多)而降低。本研究利用非正式电子废物回收工人重金属浓度潜在决定因素的“小n,大p”例子,探讨了因果推理框架和机器学习算法在暴露决定因素建模中的应用。方法:作为案例研究,我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型构建逆概率权重来解释选择偏差,并对226名可能受到重金属暴露监测的工人中的41名进行视频子研究。44个生物标志物的决定因素(如工具使用、工作任务和个人防护装备的使用)通过视频监控进行量化。测定血液中重金属(铅、锰)和尿液中重金属(镍、铜)的浓度。通过比较5种模型的留一交叉验证均方根误差(LOOCV-RMSE),我们确定了表现最佳的生物标志物决定模型:2种传统模型(多元线性回归和正向选择)和3种机器学习算法(LASSO、增强回归树和随机森林)。使用性能最好的模型,我们通过假设的工作场所控制来估计重金属浓度的降低,以确定生物标志物浓度的最重要决定因素。结果:随机森林模型具有最低的LOOCV-RMSE,可作为最终的生物标志物决定模型。阻止工人在拆解电子垃圾时弯腰驼背是重金属浓度的最重要决定因素。以血铅为例,与维持现状相比,这相当于估计减少0.81微克/分升(95%置信区间:0.66,0.98)。使用传统的回归模型(没有逆概率权重的正向选择),背部弯曲没有被确定为血铅的重要决定因素。讨论:我们使用机器学习算法的因果推理方法克服了暴露决定因素建模的常见局限性,并从假设的工作场所控制中产生易于解释的生物标志物浓度降低估计。这可以帮助工业卫生学家选择最有效的危害控制,可以根据其特定的工作环境。
{"title":"Using casual inference and machine learning with exposure determinant modeling to identify important workplace controls.","authors":"Abas Shkembi, Mohammed Abbas Virji, Jie He, Kowit Nambunmee, Pablo Ruiz-Rudolph, Richard L Neitzel","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Exposure determinant modeling can help industrial hygienists understand where, when, and how to control occupational exposures for their particular work environment. Yet, in practice, the ability to evaluate exposure determinants is degraded by selection bias (where only a subset of all exposed workers is sampled) and the statistical issue of \"small n, large p\" (few samples but many exposure determinants). This study explored the application of the causal inference framework and machine learning algorithms in exposure determinant modeling using a \"small n, large p\" example of potential determinants of heavy metal concentrations among informal electronic waste recycling workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a case study, we used a multivariable logistic regression model to construct inverse probability weights to account for selection bias into a video substudy of 41 of 226 possible workers monitored for exposures to heavy metals. Forty-four determinants of biomarkers (eg tool use, job tasks, and personal protective equipment use) were quantified through video monitoring. Concentrations of heavy metals in blood (Pb and Mn) and urine (Ni and Cu) were sampled. We identified the best-performing biomarker determinant model by comparing the leave-one-out cross-validation root-mean-squared error (LOOCV-RMSE) of 5 models: 2 traditional models (multivariate linear regression and forward selection), and 3 machine learning algorithms (LASSO, boosted regression trees, and random forests). Using the best-performing model, we estimated reductions in heavy metal concentrations through hypothetical workplace controls to identify the most important determinant of biomarker concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest model had the lowest LOOCV-RMSE and was used as the final biomarker determinant model. Stopping workers from bending their backs while dismantling e-waste was the most important determinant of heavy metal concentrations. Using blood Pb as an example, this translated to an estimated reduction of 0.81 µg/dL (95% confidence interval: 0.66, 0.98) in comparison with maintaining the status quo. Using a traditional regression model (forward selection without inverse probability weights), back bending was not identified as an important determinant of blood Pb.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our causal inference approach with machine learning algorithms overcomes the common limitations of exposure determinant modeling and produces easy-to-interpret estimates of biomarker concentration reductions from hypothetical workplace controls. This can aid industrial hygienists in choosing the most effective hazard controls that can be contextualized to their particular work setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach. 预测来自一般和职业环境的总化学暴露的相关暴露源:决策树方法的探索。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf062
Hasnaa Chettou, Natalie Von Goetz, Katleen De Brouwere, Ilse Bente Ottenbros, Clément Blassiau, Amélie Crépet, David Vernez

Objectives: To understand the total exposure of a human population to a chemical, it is necessary to aggregate exposures from different exposure routes (ingestion, inhalation, dermal uptake) and exposure sources (eg food, air, consumer products) from different environments (ie general, occupational, consumer use). Preventive actions or regulatory decisions require decisions to be taken on priority exposure routes and sources. This study explores the development of a quantitative decision tree to identify relevant exposure sources in the context of aggregate exposure. As a case study for spray applications, it focuses on joint exposure to a specific chemical in a consumer product through domestic use of hairspray, and exposure at the workplace involving surface spraying, such as spray application of paints.

Methods: Determinant of the exposure models ART (for workers) and ConsExpo (for the general population) were used to generate a wide range of realistic exposure scenarios. The dominance of one source over another was analyzed through pairwise random comparisons. Exposure estimates from one source containing a specific determinant are compared with those from the other source, scaled by a dominance ratio that defines how much higher one source's exposure must be to be considered dominant. For each comparison, the number of times one source exceeds the other by at least a dominance ratio is counted, resulting in the occurrence. The occurrence is compared with a predefined threshold (eg 80%). If the threshold is met or exceeded, the higher-contributing source is considered dominant and no exposure aggregation is needed; otherwise, aggregation of both sources is recommended.

Results: The findings indicated that the use of high- or medium-specification glove boxes, as forms of permanent encapsulation or encasing of the emission source, results in occupational exposure that is negligible compared with the exposure from consumer product use. When these glove boxes were used, hair spray exposure was the dominant source in 89% and 82% of cases, for high and medium specifications, respectively. A spraying activity with surface liquids performed outdoors (close to buildings) showed a significant trend toward occupational exposure dominance in 81% of cases. Using these three determinants, a three-layer quantitative decision tree was built to help users quickly decide whether aggregation was relevant before performing calculations. Aggregation was suggested in 91% of cases and avoided it in 9%.

目的:为了了解人类对某种化学品的总暴露量,有必要汇总不同暴露途径(摄入、吸入、皮肤吸收)和不同环境(即一般、职业、消费使用)暴露源(如食物、空气、消费品)的暴露量。预防行动或监管决定需要对优先暴露途径和来源作出决定。本研究探讨了定量决策树的发展,以确定在总暴露的背景下相关的暴露源。作为喷雾应用的案例研究,它侧重于通过家庭使用发胶共同暴露于消费品中的特定化学物质,以及在工作场所涉及表面喷涂的暴露,例如喷涂油漆。方法:使用ART(工人)和ConsExpo(一般人群)暴露模型的决定因素来生成广泛的现实暴露情景。通过两两随机比较分析了一个源对另一个源的优势。将含有特定决定因素的一种源的暴露估计与另一种源的暴露估计进行比较,并按优势比进行衡量,优势比定义了一个源的暴露必须高出多少才被认为是优势。对于每次比较,计算一个源超过另一个源至少一个优势比的次数,从而导致发生。发生率与预定义的阈值(例如80%)进行比较。如果达到或超过阈值,则认为高贡献源占主导地位,不需要进行暴露聚合;否则,建议对两个源进行聚合。结果:研究结果表明,使用高规格或中等规格的手套箱,作为永久封装或封装排放源的形式,导致的职业暴露与使用消费品的暴露相比可以忽略不计。当使用这些手套箱时,对于高规格和中等规格,分别有89%和82%的病例暴露于发胶是主要来源。在室外(靠近建筑物)进行的表面液体喷涂活动显示出81%的病例中职业暴露占主导地位的显著趋势。利用这三个决定因素,构建了一个三层定量决策树,以帮助用户在执行计算之前快速确定聚合是否相关。91%的病例建议合并,9%的病例避免合并。
{"title":"Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach.","authors":"Hasnaa Chettou, Natalie Von Goetz, Katleen De Brouwere, Ilse Bente Ottenbros, Clément Blassiau, Amélie Crépet, David Vernez","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the total exposure of a human population to a chemical, it is necessary to aggregate exposures from different exposure routes (ingestion, inhalation, dermal uptake) and exposure sources (eg food, air, consumer products) from different environments (ie general, occupational, consumer use). Preventive actions or regulatory decisions require decisions to be taken on priority exposure routes and sources. This study explores the development of a quantitative decision tree to identify relevant exposure sources in the context of aggregate exposure. As a case study for spray applications, it focuses on joint exposure to a specific chemical in a consumer product through domestic use of hairspray, and exposure at the workplace involving surface spraying, such as spray application of paints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Determinant of the exposure models ART (for workers) and ConsExpo (for the general population) were used to generate a wide range of realistic exposure scenarios. The dominance of one source over another was analyzed through pairwise random comparisons. Exposure estimates from one source containing a specific determinant are compared with those from the other source, scaled by a dominance ratio that defines how much higher one source's exposure must be to be considered dominant. For each comparison, the number of times one source exceeds the other by at least a dominance ratio is counted, resulting in the occurrence. The occurrence is compared with a predefined threshold (eg 80%). If the threshold is met or exceeded, the higher-contributing source is considered dominant and no exposure aggregation is needed; otherwise, aggregation of both sources is recommended.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that the use of high- or medium-specification glove boxes, as forms of permanent encapsulation or encasing of the emission source, results in occupational exposure that is negligible compared with the exposure from consumer product use. When these glove boxes were used, hair spray exposure was the dominant source in 89% and 82% of cases, for high and medium specifications, respectively. A spraying activity with surface liquids performed outdoors (close to buildings) showed a significant trend toward occupational exposure dominance in 81% of cases. Using these three determinants, a three-layer quantitative decision tree was built to help users quickly decide whether aggregation was relevant before performing calculations. Aggregation was suggested in 91% of cases and avoided it in 9%.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Worker exposure to persistent organic pollutants, as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and biological hazards during the processing of waste upholstered domestic seating in Great Britain. 在英国,工人在处理废物时暴露于持久性有机污染物,如多溴联苯醚和生物危害中。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf066
Rebecca J Gosling, Andrew T Simpson, Claire Bailey, Peter E J Baldwin, Samantha Lord

Pressure to increase rates of recycling in Great Britain is expected to increase to meet circular economy and net zero drivers. There are concerns about worker exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) during the processing and recycling of waste upholstered domestic seating (WUDS). The aim of this study was to understand worker exposures to POPs, specifically the flame retardants polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and other airborne substances hazardous to health, when WUDS go through the recycling process. Five WUDS processing sites were visited by a health and safety executive occupational hygienist, who collected worker and static air samples, bulk dust and bulk material samples, and assessed control measures in use. All exposures to inhalable dust and PBDEs were significantly below occupational exposure limits, while exposures to airborne bacteria and fungi were elevated at most sites. Exposures to endotoxins were above the recommended health-based nonbinding occupational exposure limits at 4 sites. Across all sites, recommended control measures were only partially met, indicating that exposures to airborne dust and biological agents could be reduced that these sites.

英国提高回收率的压力预计会增加,以满足循环经济和净零驱动。在处理和回收废弃软垫家庭座椅(WUDS)过程中,工人可能会接触到持久性有机污染物(POPs)。本研究的目的是了解工人在废柴回收过程中接触持久性有机污染物,特别是阻燃剂多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)和其他有害健康的空气传播物质的情况。一名健康和安全行政职业卫生学家访问了5个污水处理场所,收集了工人和静态空气样本、散装粉尘和散装材料样本,并评估了正在使用的控制措施。所有可吸入粉尘和多溴二苯醚的暴露量都明显低于职业暴露限值,而在大多数地点,空气中细菌和真菌的暴露量都有所增加。在4个地点,内毒素暴露超过了建议的基于健康的非约束性职业暴露限值。在所有场址,建议的控制措施仅部分得到满足,这表明这些场址可以减少空气中灰尘和生物剂的接触。
{"title":"Worker exposure to persistent organic pollutants, as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and biological hazards during the processing of waste upholstered domestic seating in Great Britain.","authors":"Rebecca J Gosling, Andrew T Simpson, Claire Bailey, Peter E J Baldwin, Samantha Lord","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pressure to increase rates of recycling in Great Britain is expected to increase to meet circular economy and net zero drivers. There are concerns about worker exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) during the processing and recycling of waste upholstered domestic seating (WUDS). The aim of this study was to understand worker exposures to POPs, specifically the flame retardants polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and other airborne substances hazardous to health, when WUDS go through the recycling process. Five WUDS processing sites were visited by a health and safety executive occupational hygienist, who collected worker and static air samples, bulk dust and bulk material samples, and assessed control measures in use. All exposures to inhalable dust and PBDEs were significantly below occupational exposure limits, while exposures to airborne bacteria and fungi were elevated at most sites. Exposures to endotoxins were above the recommended health-based nonbinding occupational exposure limits at 4 sites. Across all sites, recommended control measures were only partially met, indicating that exposures to airborne dust and biological agents could be reduced that these sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals Of Work Exposures and Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1