首页 > 最新文献

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
The effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for psychosis in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A systematic review. 22q11.2 缺失综合征精神病药物治疗的有效性和耐受性:系统综述。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241233118
Maya Tanham, Renee Chen, Nicola Warren, Helen Heussler, James G Scott

Objective: The 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common microdeletion in humans with over 180 phenotypic expressions. Approximately 30-40% of affected individuals will develop psychosis and 25% meet the criteria for schizophrenia. Despite this, pharmacotherapy for managing psychosis in 22q11.2DS is poorly understood and 22q11.2DS psychosis is frequently labelled as treatment resistant. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for 22q11.2DS psychosis and evaluate the evidence for treatment resistance.

Method: A systematic search was performed using CINAHL, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Clinical Answers), EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to December 2022. It yielded 39 case reports, 6 case series and 1 retrospective study which met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Based on the current literature, individuals with 22q11.2DS psychosis experience a greater rate of medical co-morbidities such as cardiac arrhythmias, seizures and movement disorders, which complicate pharmacotherapy. Poor tolerability rather than poor clinical response motivates the switching of antipsychotics, which may explain the labelling of treatment resistance in the literature.

Conclusion: There are insufficient data to recommend a single antipsychotic for 22q11.2DS psychosis. Nonetheless, with proactive management of co-morbidities, antipsychotic medication in 22q11.2DS psychosis is an effective treatment commonly resulting in improvement in quality of life.

目的:22q11.2 缺失综合征(22q11.2DS)是人类最常见的微缺失,有 180 多种表型表现。约 30-40% 的患者会出现精神病,25% 的患者符合精神分裂症的标准。尽管如此,人们对治疗 22q11.2DS 精神病的药物疗法知之甚少,22q11.2DS 精神病经常被贴上耐药标签。本文旨在评估药物疗法治疗 22q11.2DS 精神病的有效性和耐受性,并评估治疗耐药性的证据:方法:从开始到 2022 年 12 月,我们使用 CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆(Cochrane 系统综述数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册和 Cochrane 临床答案)、EMBASE、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science Core Collection 进行了系统检索。结果显示,有 39 篇病例报告、6 篇系列病例和 1 篇回顾性研究符合纳入标准:根据现有文献,22q11.2DS 精神病患者合并心律失常、癫痫发作和运动障碍等内科疾病的比例较高,这使得药物治疗变得复杂。耐受性差而不是临床反应差促使患者更换抗精神病药物,这可能是文献中标注治疗耐药性的原因:结论:目前还没有足够的数据推荐使用单一的抗精神病药物来治疗 22q11.2DS 精神病。尽管如此,在积极治疗并发症的情况下,22q11.2DS 精神病患者服用抗精神病药物是一种有效的治疗方法,通常能改善患者的生活质量。
{"title":"The effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for psychosis in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A systematic review.","authors":"Maya Tanham, Renee Chen, Nicola Warren, Helen Heussler, James G Scott","doi":"10.1177/00048674241233118","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241233118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common microdeletion in humans with over 180 phenotypic expressions. Approximately 30-40% of affected individuals will develop psychosis and 25% meet the criteria for schizophrenia. Despite this, pharmacotherapy for managing psychosis in 22q11.2DS is poorly understood and 22q11.2DS psychosis is frequently labelled as treatment resistant. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for 22q11.2DS psychosis and evaluate the evidence for treatment resistance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was performed using CINAHL, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Clinical Answers), EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to December 2022. It yielded 39 case reports, 6 case series and 1 retrospective study which met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the current literature, individuals with 22q11.2DS psychosis experience a greater rate of medical co-morbidities such as cardiac arrhythmias, seizures and movement disorders, which complicate pharmacotherapy. Poor tolerability rather than poor clinical response motivates the switching of antipsychotics, which may explain the labelling of treatment resistance in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are insufficient data to recommend a single antipsychotic for 22q11.2DS psychosis. Nonetheless, with proactive management of co-morbidities, antipsychotic medication in 22q11.2DS psychosis is an effective treatment commonly resulting in improvement in quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"393-403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139929808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What set some young adults apart during the COVID-19 pandemic? Mental health trajectories, risk and protective factors in an Australian longitudinal study. 是什么让一些年轻人在 COVID-19 大流行期间与众不同?澳大利亚纵向研究中的心理健康轨迹、风险和保护因素。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231223690
Amarina Donohoe-Bales, Siobhan O'Dean, Scarlett Smout, Julia Boyle, Emma Barrett, Maree Teesson, Marlee Bower

Objective: Evidence suggests that young adults (aged 18-34) were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about their longer-term mental health changes beyond the early pandemic period. This article investigates heterogeneous trajectories of mental health among Australian young adults across 2 years of the pandemic and identifies a broad range of associated risk and protective factors.

Method: Young adults (N = 653, Mage = 27.8 years) from the longitudinal Alone Together Study were surveyed biannually between July 2020 and June 2022. Measures assessed anxiety (7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale) and depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire) symptoms at Waves 1-4, as well as demographic, psychological, adversity and COVID-19 factors at baseline.

Results: Four and three distinct trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively, were identified through growth mixture modelling. The proportion of participants in each anxiety trajectory were Asymptomatic (45.9%), Mild Stable (17.9%), Moderate-Severe Stable (31.1%) and Initially Severe/Recovering (5.1%). For depression, Mild Stable (58.3%), Moderate-Severe Stable (30.5%) and Reactive/Recovering (11.2%). Baseline factors associated with severe symptom trajectories included a lifetime mental health disorder, pre-pandemic stressful events, identifying as LGBTQIA+ and/or female, and experiencing one or more infection-control measures. Higher household income was protective.

Conclusion: Most young adults demonstrated stable trajectories of low or high symptoms during the pandemic, with smaller groups showing initially severe or reactive symptoms followed by marked improvements over time. Vulnerable subgroups (gender- or sexuality-diverse, those with prior adversity or pre-existing mental ill-health) may face ongoing impacts and require targeted psychosocial supports to assist their mental health recovery post-COVID-19 and in the event of future crises.

目的:有证据表明,年轻成年人(18-34 岁)受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响尤为严重,但人们对他们在大流行初期之后的长期心理健康变化却知之甚少。本文研究了澳大利亚年轻人在疫情发生后两年内心理健康的不同变化轨迹,并确定了一系列相关的风险和保护因素:2020年7月至2022年6月期间,每两年对 "孤独在一起 "纵向研究中的年轻成年人(人数=653,年龄=27.8岁)进行一次调查。调查评估了第1-4波的焦虑(7项广泛焦虑症量表)和抑郁(9项患者健康问卷)症状,以及基线时的人口、心理、逆境和COVID-19因素:结果:通过生长混合模型,我们分别发现了四种和三种不同的焦虑和抑郁症状轨迹。每种焦虑轨迹的参与者比例分别为无症状(45.9%)、轻度稳定(17.9%)、中度-严重稳定(31.1%)和初步严重/恢复(5.1%)。抑郁症方面,轻度稳定(58.3%)、中度严重稳定(30.5%)和反应性/恢复期(11.2%)。与严重症状轨迹相关的基线因素包括终生患有精神疾病、疫情发生前的应激事件、被认定为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者+和/或女性,以及经历过一次或多次感染控制措施。较高的家庭收入具有保护作用:大多数青壮年在大流行期间表现出稳定的低或高症状轨迹,少数群体最初表现出严重或反应性症状,随后随着时间的推移症状明显改善。易受伤害的亚群体(性别或性取向不同的群体、曾有过逆境或已有心理疾病的群体)可能会面临持续的影响,需要有针对性的社会心理支持,以帮助他们在COVID-19之后以及在未来发生危机时恢复心理健康。
{"title":"What set some young adults apart during the COVID-19 pandemic? Mental health trajectories, risk and protective factors in an Australian longitudinal study.","authors":"Amarina Donohoe-Bales, Siobhan O'Dean, Scarlett Smout, Julia Boyle, Emma Barrett, Maree Teesson, Marlee Bower","doi":"10.1177/00048674231223690","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231223690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence suggests that young adults (aged 18-34) were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about their longer-term mental health changes beyond the early pandemic period. This article investigates heterogeneous trajectories of mental health among Australian young adults across 2 years of the pandemic and identifies a broad range of associated risk and protective factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Young adults (<i>N</i> = 653, M<sub>age</sub> = 27.8 years) from the longitudinal Alone Together Study were surveyed biannually between July 2020 and June 2022. Measures assessed anxiety (7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale) and depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire) symptoms at Waves 1-4, as well as demographic, psychological, adversity and COVID-19 factors at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four and three distinct trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively, were identified through growth mixture modelling. The proportion of participants in each anxiety trajectory were Asymptomatic (45.9%), Mild Stable (17.9%), Moderate-Severe Stable (31.1%) and Initially Severe/Recovering (5.1%). For depression, Mild Stable (58.3%), Moderate-Severe Stable (30.5%) and Reactive/Recovering (11.2%). Baseline factors associated with severe symptom trajectories included a lifetime mental health disorder, pre-pandemic stressful events, identifying as LGBTQIA+ and/or female, and experiencing one or more infection-control measures. Higher household income was protective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most young adults demonstrated stable trajectories of low or high symptoms during the pandemic, with smaller groups showing initially severe or reactive symptoms followed by marked improvements over time. Vulnerable subgroups (gender- or sexuality-diverse, those with prior adversity or pre-existing mental ill-health) may face ongoing impacts and require targeted psychosocial supports to assist their mental health recovery post-COVID-19 and in the event of future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055410/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139416225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating ethnic diversity: Rethinking dementia prevention in Aotearoa New Zealand. 驾驭种族多样性:重新思考新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的痴呆症预防工作。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241240586
Etuini Ma'u, Sarah Cullum, Gary Cheung
{"title":"Navigating ethnic diversity: Rethinking dementia prevention in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Etuini Ma'u, Sarah Cullum, Gary Cheung","doi":"10.1177/00048674241240586","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241240586","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"381-384"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140179281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of best practice guidelines for clinical and community service providers to prevent suicide in LGBTQA+ young people: A Delphi expert consensus study. 为临床和社区服务提供者制定预防 LGBTQA+ 青少年自杀的最佳实践指南:德尔菲专家共识研究。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231223697
Penelope Strauss, Larissa Marion, Nicole Tm Hill, Dylan Gilbey, Zoe Waters, Julia K Moore, Marco Costanza, Michelle Lamblin, Jo Robinson, Ashleigh Lin, Yael Perry

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop best practice guidelines for preventing suicide and reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviours in LGBTQA+ young people (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, asexual, and those of other diverse sexualities and genders) within clinical and community service settings in Australia.

Methods: We conducted a Delphi expert consensus study. A systematic literature search and interviews with key informants informed an initial 270-item questionnaire. Two expert panels completed the questionnaire, delivered over two rounds: (1) Australian professionals with expertise in LGBTQA+ mental health/suicide prevention and (2) Australian LGBTQA+ young people aged 14-25 with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Items endorsed as 'essential' or 'important' by >80% of both expert panels were included in the guidelines.

Results: A total of 115 people participated in the Delphi process; n = 52 professionals completed Round 1, and n = 42 completed Round 2; n = 63 LGBTQA+ young people completed Round 1, and n = 50 completed Round 2. A total of 290 items were included in the guidelines and grouped into: (1) general principles for creating an affirming and inclusive environment for LGBTQA+ young people; (2) assessing suicide risk and working with suicidal LGBTQA+ young people; (3) considerations for specific LGBTQA+ populations; and (4) advocating for LGBTQA+ young people.

Conclusion: These guidelines are the first of their kind in Australia. They provide practical support to service providers regardless of prior training in LGBTQ+ identities or mental health, with the aim of reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviours, and preventing suicide, in LGBTQA+ young people.

研究目的本研究旨在为澳大利亚临床和社区服务环境中的 LGBTQA+ 青少年(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者/质疑者、无性恋者以及其他不同性取向和性别者)制定预防自杀、减少自杀想法和行为的最佳实践指南:我们开展了一项德尔菲专家共识研究。通过系统的文献检索和与主要信息提供者的访谈,我们获得了一份包含 270 个项目的初步调查问卷。两个专家小组分两轮完成了问卷:(1) 在 LGBTQA+ 心理健康/自杀预防方面拥有专业知识的澳大利亚专业人士;(2) 年龄在 14-25 岁、有自杀想法和/或行为经历的澳大利亚 LGBTQA+ 年轻人。两个专家小组中均有超过 80% 的人认为 "必要 "或 "重要 "的项目被纳入指南:共有 115 人参与了德尔菲进程;n = 52 名专业人士完成了第一轮,n = 42 名专业人士完成了第二轮;n = 63 名 LGBTQA+ 青少年完成了第一轮,n = 50 名 LGBTQA+ 青少年完成了第二轮。该指南共包含 290 个项目,分为:(1)为 LGBTQA+ 青少年营造肯定和包容环境的一般原则;(2)评估自杀风险并与有自杀倾向的 LGBTQA+ 青少年合作;(3)针对特定 LGBTQA+ 群体的注意事项;以及(4)为 LGBTQA+ 青少年进行宣传:这些指南在澳大利亚尚属首创。这些指南为服务提供者提供了切实可行的支持,无论他们之前是否接受过 LGBTQ+ 身份或心理健康方面的培训,其目的是减少 LGBTQA+ 青少年的自杀想法和行为,并预防自杀。
{"title":"Development of best practice guidelines for clinical and community service providers to prevent suicide in LGBTQA+ young people: A Delphi expert consensus study.","authors":"Penelope Strauss, Larissa Marion, Nicole Tm Hill, Dylan Gilbey, Zoe Waters, Julia K Moore, Marco Costanza, Michelle Lamblin, Jo Robinson, Ashleigh Lin, Yael Perry","doi":"10.1177/00048674231223697","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231223697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop best practice guidelines for preventing suicide and reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviours in LGBTQA+ young people (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, asexual, and those of other diverse sexualities and genders) within clinical and community service settings in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Delphi expert consensus study. A systematic literature search and interviews with key informants informed an initial 270-item questionnaire. Two expert panels completed the questionnaire, delivered over two rounds: (1) Australian professionals with expertise in LGBTQA+ mental health/suicide prevention and (2) Australian LGBTQA+ young people aged 14-25 with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Items endorsed as 'essential' or 'important' by >80% of both expert panels were included in the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 people participated in the Delphi process; <i>n</i> = 52 professionals completed Round 1, and <i>n</i> = 42 completed Round 2; <i>n</i> = 63 LGBTQA+ young people completed Round 1, and <i>n</i> = 50 completed Round 2. A total of 290 items were included in the guidelines and grouped into: (1) general principles for creating an affirming and inclusive environment for LGBTQA+ young people; (2) assessing suicide risk and working with suicidal LGBTQA+ young people; (3) considerations for specific LGBTQA+ populations; and (4) advocating for LGBTQA+ young people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These guidelines are the first of their kind in Australia. They provide practical support to service providers regardless of prior training in LGBTQ+ identities or mental health, with the aim of reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviours, and preventing suicide, in LGBTQA+ young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"425-434"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OPCAT: How an international treaty regarding torture is relevant to the Australian mental health system. 禁止酷刑公约任择议定书》:关于酷刑的国际条约如何与澳大利亚精神卫生系统相关。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231221419
Calina Ouliaris, Neeraj Gill, Melissa Castan, Suresh Sundram

The United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visits signatory nations to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). Its role is to monitor and support signatory nations in implementing and complying with the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). In October 2022, the United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visited Australia but was barred from visiting mental health wards in Queensland and all detention facilities in New South Wales leading to the termination of its visit. This breach of Australia's obligations under the OPCAT presents a significant setback for the rights of people with mental illness and other involuntarily detained populations. This piece sets out to demonstrate the relevance of OPCAT to the mental health system in Australia. Individuals who are detained for compulsory treatment in locked facilities such as acute psychiatric inpatient wards and forensic mental health facilities are deprived of their liberty, often out of public view. Thus, it highlights the ethical and professional obligations of all mental health professionals, especially psychiatrists, to safeguard the human rights of individuals being detained in mental health facilities as enshrined in Australia's international legal obligations under the OPCAT. Adhering to these obligations diminishes the risk of future human rights violations of people with mental illness.

联合国防范酷刑小组委员会访问《禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚公约任择议定书》(OPCAT)的签署国。其作用是监督和支持签署国执行和遵守《禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚公约》(《禁止酷刑公约》)。2022 年 10 月,联合国防范酷刑小组委员会访问了澳大利亚,但却被禁止访问昆士兰州的精神卫生病房和新南威尔士州的所有拘留设施,导致其访问被迫终止。澳大利亚违反了《禁止酷刑公约任择议定书》规定的义务,使精神病患者和其他非自愿被拘留者的权利遭受了重大挫折。本文旨在说明《禁止酷刑公约任择议定书》与澳大利亚精神卫生系统的相关性。因强制治疗而被拘留在诸如急性精神病住院病房和法医精神卫生设施等封闭设施中的人被剥夺了自由,而且往往是在公众视野之外。因此,它强调了所有心理健康专业人员,尤其是精神科医生的道德和专业义务,即保障被拘留在心理健康设施中的个人的人权,这是澳大利亚根据《禁止酷刑公约任择议定书》所承担的国际法律义务。遵守这些义务可以降低未来侵犯精神病患者人权的风险。
{"title":"OPCAT: How an international treaty regarding torture is relevant to the Australian mental health system.","authors":"Calina Ouliaris, Neeraj Gill, Melissa Castan, Suresh Sundram","doi":"10.1177/00048674231221419","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231221419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visits signatory nations to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). Its role is to monitor and support signatory nations in implementing and complying with the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). In October 2022, the United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visited Australia but was barred from visiting mental health wards in Queensland and all detention facilities in New South Wales leading to the termination of its visit. This breach of Australia's obligations under the OPCAT presents a significant setback for the rights of people with mental illness and other involuntarily detained populations. This piece sets out to demonstrate the relevance of OPCAT to the mental health system in Australia. Individuals who are detained for compulsory treatment in locked facilities such as acute psychiatric inpatient wards and forensic mental health facilities are deprived of their liberty, often out of public view. Thus, it highlights the ethical and professional obligations of all mental health professionals, especially psychiatrists, to safeguard the human rights of individuals being detained in mental health facilities as enshrined in Australia's international legal obligations under the OPCAT. Adhering to these obligations diminishes the risk of future human rights violations of people with mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055407/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in mental health support-seeking former-serving Australian defence force veterans. 寻求心理健康支持的前澳大利亚国防军退伍军人中的 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复合创伤后应激障碍。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241230197
Daniel Bressington, Philip Hyland, Hannah Steele, Mitchell Byrne, David Mitchell, Carol Keane, Mark Shevlin, Grace Ho, Janina Catalao Dionisio Murta, Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig, Xianliang Liu, Jianxia Zhai, Dominic Murphy, Thanos Karatzias

Background: ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder is a more severe condition than post-traumatic stress disorder, and recent studies indicate it is more prevalent among military samples. In this study, we tested the psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire, assessed the relative prevalence rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in the sample population and explored relationships between complex post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder and a range of risk factors.

Methods: Survey participants (N = 189) were mental health support-seeking former-serving veterans of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) recruited from primary care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial validity of the International Trauma Questionnaire.

Results: The latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire was best represented by a two-factor second-order model consistent with the ICD-11 model of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The International Trauma Questionnaire scale scores demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Overall, 9.1% (95% confidence interval = [4.8%, 13.5%]) met diagnostic requirements for post-traumatic stress disorder and an additional 51.4% (95% confidence interval = [44.0%, 58.9%]) met requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Those meeting diagnostic requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder were more likely to have served in the military for 15 years or longer, had a history of more traumatic life events and had the highest levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms.

Conclusion: The International Trauma Questionnaire can effectively distinguish between post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder within primary care samples of Australian Defence Force veterans. A significantly greater proportion of Australian Defence Force veterans met criteria for complex post-traumatic stress disorder than post-traumatic stress disorder. Australian military mental health services should adopt the International Trauma Questionnaire to routinely screen for complex post-traumatic stress disorder and develop complex post-traumatic stress disorder specific interventions to promote recovery in Australian Defence Force veterans with complex post-traumatic stress disorder.

背景:与创伤后应激障碍相比,ICD-11复杂创伤后应激障碍是一种更为严重的疾病,最近的研究表明,它在军队样本中更为普遍。在这项研究中,我们测试了国际创伤问卷的心理测量特性,评估了样本人群中创伤后应激障碍和复合型创伤后应激障碍的相对患病率,并探讨了复合型创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍与一系列风险因素之间的关系:调查参与者(N = 189)是从基层医疗机构招募的寻求心理健康支持的澳大利亚国防军(ADF)退伍军人。结果:国际心理创伤问卷的潜在结构为:"心理创伤"、"心理创伤"、"心理创伤"、"心理创伤 "和 "心理创伤":结果:国际创伤问卷的潜在结构通过一个与 ICD-11 复杂创伤后应激障碍模型一致的双因子二阶模型得到了最好的体现。国际创伤问卷的量表得分显示出极佳的内部可靠性。总体而言,9.1%(95% 置信区间 = [4.8%, 13.5%])的人符合创伤后应激障碍的诊断要求,另有 51.4%(95% 置信区间 = [44.0%, 58.9%])的人符合复杂创伤后应激障碍的诊断要求。符合复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断要求的人更有可能在军队服役 15 年或更长时间,有更多的创伤性生活事件史,抑郁、焦虑和应激症状水平最高:国际创伤问卷能有效区分澳大利亚国防军退伍军人初级保健样本中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍。符合复杂创伤后应激障碍标准的澳大利亚国防军退伍军人比例明显高于创伤后应激障碍。澳大利亚军事心理健康服务机构应采用国际创伤问卷对复杂创伤后应激障碍进行常规筛查,并制定针对复杂创伤后应激障碍的干预措施,以促进患有复杂创伤后应激障碍的澳大利亚国防军退伍军人的康复。
{"title":"ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in mental health support-seeking former-serving Australian defence force veterans.","authors":"Daniel Bressington, Philip Hyland, Hannah Steele, Mitchell Byrne, David Mitchell, Carol Keane, Mark Shevlin, Grace Ho, Janina Catalao Dionisio Murta, Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig, Xianliang Liu, Jianxia Zhai, Dominic Murphy, Thanos Karatzias","doi":"10.1177/00048674241230197","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241230197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder is a more severe condition than post-traumatic stress disorder, and recent studies indicate it is more prevalent among military samples. In this study, we tested the psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire, assessed the relative prevalence rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in the sample population and explored relationships between complex post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder and a range of risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey participants (<i>N</i> = 189) were mental health support-seeking former-serving veterans of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) recruited from primary care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial validity of the International Trauma Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire was best represented by a two-factor second-order model consistent with the ICD-11 model of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The International Trauma Questionnaire scale scores demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Overall, 9.1% (95% confidence interval = [4.8%, 13.5%]) met diagnostic requirements for post-traumatic stress disorder and an additional 51.4% (95% confidence interval = [44.0%, 58.9%]) met requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Those meeting diagnostic requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder were more likely to have served in the military for 15 years or longer, had a history of more traumatic life events and had the highest levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The International Trauma Questionnaire can effectively distinguish between post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder within primary care samples of Australian Defence Force veterans. A significantly greater proportion of Australian Defence Force veterans met criteria for complex post-traumatic stress disorder than post-traumatic stress disorder. Australian military mental health services should adopt the International Trauma Questionnaire to routinely screen for complex post-traumatic stress disorder and develop complex post-traumatic stress disorder specific interventions to promote recovery in Australian Defence Force veterans with complex post-traumatic stress disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"416-424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139705948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment guesses in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study: Accuracy, unblinding and influence on outcomes. 青少年抑郁症治疗研究中的治疗猜测:准确性、非绑定和对结果的影响。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231218623
Jon Jureidini, Joanna Moncrieff, Julie Klau, Natalie Aboustate, Melissa Raven

Objective: We evaluated the presence and impact of unblinding during the influential Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006286).

Method: Our analysis was part of a Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials reanalysis. Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study trialled fluoxetine, placebo, cognitive behaviour therapy or their combination, in treating adolescents with major depressive disorder. We analysed the accuracy of guesses of fluoxetine or placebo allocation, and their effects on change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised at 12 weeks.

Results: Of 221 participants allocated to fluoxetine or placebo, 151 adolescents (68%) had their guess about pill-treatment-arm allocation recorded at week 6, and guesses were recorded for 154 independent evaluators, 159 parents and 164 pharmacotherapists. All of these groups guessed treatment allocation more accurately than would be expected by chance (60-66% accuracy; all p-values ⩽ 0.004). Guesses did not become more accurate between 6 and 12 weeks and were not predicted by adverse events, though event documentation was poor. Treatment guess had a substantial and statistically significant effect on outcome (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised change mean difference 9.12 [4.69; 13.55], β = 0.334, p < 0.001), but actual treatment arm did not (1.53 [-2.83; 5.89], β = 0.056, p = 0.489). Removing guess from the analysis increased the apparent effect of treatment arm, making it almost statistically significant at the conventional alpha-level of 0.05 (p = 0.06).

Conclusions: For Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study, treatment guesses strongly predicted outcomes and may have led to the exaggeration of drug effectiveness in the absence of actual effects. The integrity of double-blinding in trials should be routinely assessed and reported.

目的: 我们评估了有影响力的青少年抑郁症治疗研究(ClinicalTrials.gov Identificates: NCT00006286)中是否存在解除盲法及其影响:我们评估了 "青少年抑郁症影响性治疗研究"(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006286)中是否存在解除盲法及其影响:我们的分析是 "恢复无形试验和废弃试验 "重新分析的一部分。青少年抑郁症治疗研究对氟西汀、安慰剂、认知行为疗法或它们的组合进行了试验,以治疗患有重度抑郁症的青少年。我们分析了氟西汀或安慰剂分配猜测的准确性,以及它们对12周后儿童抑郁评分量表(修订版)变化的影响:在221名被分配服用氟西汀或安慰剂的参与者中,151名青少年(68%)在第6周时记录了他们对药片治疗组分配的猜测,154名独立评估员、159名家长和164名药物治疗师也记录了他们的猜测。所有这些小组对治疗分配的猜测准确率都高于预期(准确率为 60-66%;所有 p 值均 ⩽ 0.004)。在 6 周和 12 周之间,猜测的准确性并没有提高,也不会受到不良事件的影响,尽管不良事件记录较差。治疗猜测对治疗结果有很大的统计学影响(儿童抑郁评分量表-修订版变化均值差异 9.12 [4.69; 13.55],β = 0.334,p < 0.001),但实际治疗臂没有影响(1.53 [-2.83; 5.89],β = 0.056,p = 0.489)。从分析中剔除 "猜测 "后,治疗组的表观效应有所增加,在传统的 0.05 α 水平上几乎具有统计学意义(p = 0.06):结论:在青少年抑郁症治疗研究中,治疗猜测对结果有很强的预测作用,可能导致在没有实际效果的情况下夸大药物的疗效。应定期评估和报告试验中双盲的完整性。
{"title":"Treatment guesses in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study: Accuracy, unblinding and influence on outcomes.","authors":"Jon Jureidini, Joanna Moncrieff, Julie Klau, Natalie Aboustate, Melissa Raven","doi":"10.1177/00048674231218623","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231218623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the presence and impact of unblinding during the influential Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006286).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our analysis was part of a Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials reanalysis. Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study trialled fluoxetine, placebo, cognitive behaviour therapy or their combination, in treating adolescents with major depressive disorder. We analysed the accuracy of guesses of fluoxetine or placebo allocation, and their effects on change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 221 participants allocated to fluoxetine or placebo, 151 adolescents (68%) had their guess about pill-treatment-arm allocation recorded at week 6, and guesses were recorded for 154 independent evaluators, 159 parents and 164 pharmacotherapists. All of these groups guessed treatment allocation more accurately than would be expected by chance (60-66% accuracy; all <i>p</i>-values ⩽ 0.004). Guesses did not become more accurate between 6 and 12 weeks and were not predicted by adverse events, though event documentation was poor. Treatment guess had a substantial and statistically significant effect on outcome (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised change mean difference 9.12 [4.69; 13.55], β = 0.334, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but actual treatment arm did not (1.53 [-2.83; 5.89], β = 0.056, <i>p</i> = 0.489). Removing guess from the analysis increased the apparent effect of treatment arm, making it almost statistically significant at the conventional alpha-level of 0.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study, treatment guesses strongly predicted outcomes and may have led to the exaggeration of drug effectiveness in the absence of actual effects. The integrity of double-blinding in trials should be routinely assessed and reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"355-364"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138827963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding and addressing racism in clinical encounters. 了解并解决临床工作中的种族主义问题。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231219854
Chanaka Wijeratne, Swapnil Sharma, Matthew Large
{"title":"Understanding and addressing racism in clinical encounters.","authors":"Chanaka Wijeratne, Swapnil Sharma, Matthew Large","doi":"10.1177/00048674231219854","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231219854","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"297-299"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138827964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is cognitive behavioral therapy more effective than pharmacotherapy for binge spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 认知行为疗法比药物疗法对暴饮暴食谱系障碍更有效吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231219593
Myrto T Samara, Niki Michou, Andreas S Lappas, Aikaterini Argyrou, Elissavet Mathioudaki, Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi, Eirini Tsekitsidi, Zoi A Polyzopoulou, Nikos Christodoulou, Georgios Papazisis, Michail Chourdakis

Objectives: Binge spectrum disorders are prevalent worldwide. Psychiatric and medical comorbidities are common, and societal costs are significant. Evidence-based treatment remains underutilized. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the recommended first-line treatment, but pharmacotherapy may be easier to access.

Interventions: Meta-analytic evidence directly comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy is lacking. We aimed to compare the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy interventions with any pharmacological treatment for binge spectrum disorders. We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists for randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with any pharmacotherapy for bulimia nervosa/binge eating disorder and performed pairwise meta-analytic evaluations.

Primary outcomes: Primary outcomes are remission and frequency of binges. Secondary outcomes are frequency of purges, response, eating disorder psychopathology, weight/body mass index, depression, anxiety, quality of life and dropouts.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with fluoxetine/imipramine/desipramine/methylphenidate/sibutramine were identified (N = 531). Cognitive behavioral therapy was superior to antidepressants in terms of remission, frequency of binges and eating disorder psychopathology. There were no statistically significant differences for any of the individual cognitive behavioral therapy vs drug comparisons in terms of response/depression/anxiety/weight/quality of life/dropouts. Cognitive behavioral therapy was not superior to sibutramine/methylphenidate for the primary outcomes.

Conclusions: Data are scarce, comparisons underpowered and, considering the inherent methodological limitations of psychotherapy trials, questions arise regarding the presumed superiority of cognitive behavioral therapy. Further research is needed.

目的:暴饮暴食谱系障碍在全球普遍存在。精神和医疗并发症很常见,社会成本也很高。循证治疗仍未得到充分利用。认知行为疗法是推荐的一线治疗方法,但药物疗法可能更容易获得:缺乏直接比较认知行为疗法和药物疗法的 Meta 分析证据。我们旨在比较认知行为疗法干预与任何药物治疗对暴饮暴食谱系障碍的效果。我们在PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、ClinicalTrials.gov和参考文献列表中检索了比较认知行为疗法与任何药物疗法治疗暴食症/进食障碍的随机对照试验,并进行了配对荟萃分析评估:主要结果:缓解和暴食频率是主要结果。次要结果包括暴食频率、反应、进食障碍心理病理学、体重/体重指数、抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和辍学:结果:11 项随机对照试验比较了认知行为疗法与氟西汀/丙咪嗪/地西普胺/哌甲酯/西布曲明(N = 531)。在缓解率、暴食频率和饮食失调精神病理学方面,认知行为疗法均优于抗抑郁药物。在反应/抑郁/焦虑/体重/生活质量/辍学方面,认知行为疗法与药物的单项比较差异均无统计学意义。就主要结果而言,认知行为疗法并不优于西布曲明/哌醋甲酯:数据稀缺,对比研究动力不足,考虑到心理疗法试验固有的方法局限性,认知行为疗法的假定优越性会引起质疑。需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Is cognitive behavioral therapy more effective than pharmacotherapy for binge spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Myrto T Samara, Niki Michou, Andreas S Lappas, Aikaterini Argyrou, Elissavet Mathioudaki, Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi, Eirini Tsekitsidi, Zoi A Polyzopoulou, Nikos Christodoulou, Georgios Papazisis, Michail Chourdakis","doi":"10.1177/00048674231219593","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231219593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Binge spectrum disorders are prevalent worldwide. Psychiatric and medical comorbidities are common, and societal costs are significant. Evidence-based treatment remains underutilized. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the recommended first-line treatment, but pharmacotherapy may be easier to access.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Meta-analytic evidence directly comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy is lacking. We aimed to compare the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy interventions with any pharmacological treatment for binge spectrum disorders. We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists for randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with any pharmacotherapy for bulimia nervosa/binge eating disorder and performed pairwise meta-analytic evaluations.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>Primary outcomes are remission and frequency of binges. Secondary outcomes are frequency of purges, response, eating disorder psychopathology, weight/body mass index, depression, anxiety, quality of life and dropouts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with fluoxetine/imipramine/desipramine/methylphenidate/sibutramine were identified (<i>N</i> = 531). Cognitive behavioral therapy was superior to antidepressants in terms of remission, frequency of binges and eating disorder psychopathology. There were no statistically significant differences for any of the individual cognitive behavioral therapy vs drug comparisons in terms of response/depression/anxiety/weight/quality of life/dropouts. Cognitive behavioral therapy was not superior to sibutramine/methylphenidate for the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data are scarce, comparisons underpowered and, considering the inherent methodological limitations of psychotherapy trials, questions arise regarding the presumed superiority of cognitive behavioral therapy. Further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"308-319"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139097218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disturbed interoception in body dysmorphic disorder: A framework for future research. 身体畸形障碍中紊乱的内感知:未来研究框架。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231215030
Paul M Jenkinson, Susan L Rossell

Body dysmorphic disorder is a severe psychiatric condition characterised by a preoccupation with a perceived appearance flaw or flaws that are typically not observable to others. Although significant advances in understanding the disorder have been made in the past decade, current explanations focus on cognitive, behavioural and visual perceptual disturbances that contribute to the disorder. Such a focus does not consider how perception of the internal body or interoception may be involved, despite (1) clinical observations of disturbed perception of the body in body dysmorphic disorder and (2) disturbed interoception being increasingly recognised as a transdiagnostic factor underlying a wide range of psychopathologies. In this paper, we use an existing model of hierarchical brain function and neural (predictive) processing to propose that body dysmorphic disorder involves defective interoception, with perceived appearance flaws being the result of 'interoceptive prediction errors' that cause body parts to be experienced as 'not just right'. We aim to provide a framework for interoceptive research into body dysmorphic disorder, and outline areas for future research.

躯体畸形障碍是一种严重的精神疾病,其特征是专注于自己认为的外貌缺陷,而这些缺陷通常是他人无法观察到的。尽管在过去十年中,人们对这种疾病的认识取得了重大进展,但目前的解释主要集中在认知、行为和视觉感知方面的障碍,而这些障碍是导致这种疾病的原因。尽管(1)临床观察发现躯体畸形障碍患者对身体的感知受到干扰,以及(2)人们越来越认识到干扰的内感知是导致多种精神病症的一个跨诊断因素,但这种关注点并没有考虑到对身体内部或内感知的感知可能是如何参与其中的。在本文中,我们利用现有的大脑分层功能和神经(预测)处理模型,提出身体畸形障碍涉及有缺陷的内感知,感知到的外观缺陷是 "内感知预测错误 "的结果,导致身体部位被体验为 "不恰到好处"。我们旨在为身体畸形障碍的内感知研究提供一个框架,并概述未来的研究领域。
{"title":"Disturbed interoception in body dysmorphic disorder: A framework for future research.","authors":"Paul M Jenkinson, Susan L Rossell","doi":"10.1177/00048674231215030","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674231215030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body dysmorphic disorder is a severe psychiatric condition characterised by a preoccupation with a perceived appearance flaw or flaws that are typically not observable to others. Although significant advances in understanding the disorder have been made in the past decade, current explanations focus on cognitive, behavioural and visual perceptual disturbances that contribute to the disorder. Such a focus does not consider how perception of the internal body or <i>interoception</i> may be involved, despite (1) clinical observations of disturbed perception of the body in body dysmorphic disorder and (2) disturbed interoception being increasingly recognised as a transdiagnostic factor underlying a wide range of psychopathologies. In this paper, we use an existing model of hierarchical brain function and neural (predictive) processing to propose that body dysmorphic disorder involves defective interoception, with perceived appearance flaws being the result of 'interoceptive prediction errors' that cause body parts to be experienced as 'not just right'. We aim to provide a framework for interoceptive research into body dysmorphic disorder, and outline areas for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"300-307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138486560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1