Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-02DOI: 10.1111/avj.13472
A F Bullen, J W Macgregor, B Corbin, K Warren
Introduction: Physiological responses to anaesthesia are described for the first time in eastern barred bandicoot (EBB; Perameles gunnii) and southern brown bandicoot (SBB; Isoodon obesulus).
Method: Two hundred and six field anaesthetics were carried out on free-ranging bandicoots (82 EBB and 66 SBB) in North West Tasmania. Animals were induced and maintained under general anaesthesia using isoflurane administered via a face mask.
Results: On average, animals required 3% isoflurane for anaesthesia maintenance and recovered within 2-3 min of isoflurane being discontinued. SBB had higher respiratory rates than EBB. Otherwise, we found no significant differences in anaesthetic parameters between the bandicoot species, between sexes or for females with pouch young. Hypothermia was the only anaesthetic-associated adverse event during this study, occurring in 26 anaesthetics (12.6%). At the start of anaesthesia, bandicoots had a mean body temperature of 35.0°C (SEM 0.8, SD 1.2), and 95% of animals lost temperature during anaesthesia. Bandicoots with an initial body temperature of less than 34.5°C had 20 times greater risk (odds ratio 20.52, 95% CI 5.58-77.19) of developing hypothermia (defined as Tb < 33°C). Heart rates ranged from 100 to >300 beats per minute, and respiratory rates ranged from 8 to 64 breaths per minute. Data support a heart rate reference interval of 140-285 (mean 208, SD 42.72) and a respiratory rate interval of 10-34 for SBB (mean 21, SD 8.89) and 8-20 for EBB (mean 12, SD 4.72) during maintenance of inhalant anaesthesia.
Conclusions: With hypothermia the only anaesthesia-related adverse event during this study, results support the safety of this form of chemical restraint in the field and provide empirical data that may be used to guide anaesthesia for bandicoots. Results suggest that standard inhalational anaesthetic protocols are suitable for bandicoots irrespective of weight, sex and reproductive status.
简介:对麻醉的生理反应首次描述在东部横斑(EBB;Perameles gunnii)和南方棕色土豆科;Isoodon obesulus)。方法:对塔斯马尼亚州西北部自由放养的野鸡(82只EBB, 66只SBB)进行野外麻醉。用面罩给药异氟醚诱导和维持动物全身麻醉。结果:平均而言,动物需要3%异氟醚维持麻醉,并在停用异氟醚后2-3分钟内恢复。SBB组呼吸频率高于EBB组。除此之外,我们发现在不同种类、不同性别或育有育儿袋的雌性间,麻醉参数没有显著差异。低温是本研究中唯一与麻醉剂相关的不良事件,发生在26例麻醉剂中(12.6%)。麻醉开始时,兔兔的平均体温为35.0°C (SEM 0.8, SD 1.2), 95%的动物在麻醉期间体温下降。初始体温低于34.5°C的受试者发生低温(定义为每分钟300次,呼吸频率为每分钟8至64次)的风险高出20倍(优势比20.52,95% CI 5.58-77.19)。数据支持在吸入麻醉维持期间,SBB的心率参考间隔为140-285(平均208,标准差42.72),SBB的呼吸频率间隔为10-34(平均21,标准差8.89),EBB的呼吸频率间隔为8-20(平均12,标准差4.72)。结论:在本研究中,低温是唯一与麻醉相关的不良事件,结果支持这种形式的化学约束在该领域的安全性,并提供可用于指导麻醉的经验数据。结果表明,无论体重、性别和生殖状况如何,标准的吸入麻醉方案都适用于土拨鼠。
{"title":"Physiological parameter changes during field anaesthesia of bandicoots.","authors":"A F Bullen, J W Macgregor, B Corbin, K Warren","doi":"10.1111/avj.13472","DOIUrl":"10.1111/avj.13472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physiological responses to anaesthesia are described for the first time in eastern barred bandicoot (EBB; Perameles gunnii) and southern brown bandicoot (SBB; Isoodon obesulus).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred and six field anaesthetics were carried out on free-ranging bandicoots (82 EBB and 66 SBB) in North West Tasmania. Animals were induced and maintained under general anaesthesia using isoflurane administered via a face mask.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, animals required 3% isoflurane for anaesthesia maintenance and recovered within 2-3 min of isoflurane being discontinued. SBB had higher respiratory rates than EBB. Otherwise, we found no significant differences in anaesthetic parameters between the bandicoot species, between sexes or for females with pouch young. Hypothermia was the only anaesthetic-associated adverse event during this study, occurring in 26 anaesthetics (12.6%). At the start of anaesthesia, bandicoots had a mean body temperature of 35.0°C (SEM 0.8, SD 1.2), and 95% of animals lost temperature during anaesthesia. Bandicoots with an initial body temperature of less than 34.5°C had 20 times greater risk (odds ratio 20.52, 95% CI 5.58-77.19) of developing hypothermia (defined as T<sub>b</sub> < 33°C). Heart rates ranged from 100 to >300 beats per minute, and respiratory rates ranged from 8 to 64 breaths per minute. Data support a heart rate reference interval of 140-285 (mean 208, SD 42.72) and a respiratory rate interval of 10-34 for SBB (mean 21, SD 8.89) and 8-20 for EBB (mean 12, SD 4.72) during maintenance of inhalant anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With hypothermia the only anaesthesia-related adverse event during this study, results support the safety of this form of chemical restraint in the field and provide empirical data that may be used to guide anaesthesia for bandicoots. Results suggest that standard inhalational anaesthetic protocols are suitable for bandicoots irrespective of weight, sex and reproductive status.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":"506-517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144551823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TS Barnes, E Brayley, T Moore, R Allavena, J Meers, D McNab, R Thompson, J Hunnam, D Worsfold, R Cobbold
Australia's large populations of feral and extensively farmed livestock pose challenges to implementing response plans in the event of an Emergency Animal Disease outbreak. This study aimed to determine if a “Destroy and Let Lie” approach to carcass disposal (leaving carcasses in situ to decompose naturally after field euthanasia) would reliably inactivate Foot and Mouth Disease virus (FMDV) and African Swine Fever virus (ASFV) under Australian conditions. Ninety-five animals (24 each of cattle, sheep, goats and 23 pigs) were used across six trials, conducted in winter and summer, in three locations in Eastern Australia. After euthanasia, temperature and pH were measured at six internal anatomical sites hourly for 24 h, then less frequently for a further 24 h. Data were compared with published FMDV and ASFV inactivation thresholds to assess the likely effectiveness of field decomposition in reducing viral infectivity. Tissue pH levels generally declined for the first 6–12 h postmortem. Based on a pH threshold of <6, FMDV would be reliably inactivated in the thoracic and abdominal cavities and deep and superficial muscle sites. In contrast, no porcine tissues at any location in any season would provide inactivation of ASFV, based on a pH threshold of <3.9. “Destroy and Let Lie” appears to be a suitable approach to reduce risk of FMDV transmission from carcasses that cannot be disposed of using conventional means under Australian field conditions. This would not be the case for an ASF outbreak, where expected viral inactivation would be minimal.
{"title":"Predicted foot and mouth disease virus and African swine fever virus inactivation within carcasses undergoing field decomposition in three Australian climate zones","authors":"TS Barnes, E Brayley, T Moore, R Allavena, J Meers, D McNab, R Thompson, J Hunnam, D Worsfold, R Cobbold","doi":"10.1111/avj.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/avj.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Australia's large populations of feral and extensively farmed livestock pose challenges to implementing response plans in the event of an Emergency Animal Disease outbreak. This study aimed to determine if a “Destroy and Let Lie” approach to carcass disposal (leaving carcasses <i>in situ</i> to decompose naturally after field euthanasia) would reliably inactivate Foot and Mouth Disease virus (FMDV) and African Swine Fever virus (ASFV) under Australian conditions. Ninety-five animals (24 each of cattle, sheep, goats and 23 pigs) were used across six trials, conducted in winter and summer, in three locations in Eastern Australia. After euthanasia, temperature and pH were measured at six internal anatomical sites hourly for 24 h, then less frequently for a further 24 h. Data were compared with published FMDV and ASFV inactivation thresholds to assess the likely effectiveness of field decomposition in reducing viral infectivity. Tissue pH levels generally declined for the first 6–12 h postmortem. Based on a pH threshold of <6, FMDV would be reliably inactivated in the thoracic and abdominal cavities and deep and superficial muscle sites. In contrast, no porcine tissues at any location in any season would provide inactivation of ASFV, based on a pH threshold of <3.9. “Destroy and Let Lie” appears to be a suitable approach to reduce risk of FMDV transmission from carcasses that cannot be disposed of using conventional means under Australian field conditions. This would not be the case for an ASF outbreak, where expected viral inactivation would be minimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":"103 9","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444607/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ME Westman, SJ Coggins, M van Dorsselaer, JM Norris, RA Squires, M Thompson, R Malik
Progressive feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection dramatically shortens the lives of infected cats, causing acquired immunodeficiency, aplastic anaemia, lymphoma, leukaemia and other myeloproliferative diseases. The potential impact of regressive FeLV infection on the development of disease remains largely unknown, although there is evidence it contributes to lymphoma development. Despite a perception that there has been a general decline in the incidence of progressive FeLV infection in Australia and New Zealand, it remains an important health threat and the risk of infection should not be ignored. Clinicians should therefore have a thorough understanding of the complexities surrounding the diagnosis, management and prevention of this disease. Point-of-care (PoC) antigen testing using whole blood is the first step to detect progressive FeLV infection. Clinicians should remember the increased rate of false-positive results using such kits when the disease being detected is at a low prevalence. We therefore advise that confirmatory FeLV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to detect proviral DNA is essential before a PoC-positive cat can be confirmed as being FeLV-infected. Critically, progressively infected cats should not be euthanased because of a positive FeLV diagnosis, as some cats will remain healthy for many years. Regressively infected cats should not be used as blood donors, so blood donor programmes should include FeLV antigen and provirus PCR testing in their standard screening protocols. No cure currently exists for progressive or regressive FeLV infection; therefore, veterinarians should advocate to minimise the exposure of cats to FeLV as a first-line preventative strategy. The most reliable way to achieve this is for cats to be kept indoors, or with secured outdoor access (e.g., cat enclosures and secure gardens). Cats kept in this manner do not require FeLV vaccination. All animal holding facilities should aim to individually house untested adult cats to limit the spread of FeLV infection. For at-risk cats that cannot be kept indoors/enclosed, or for cats that live together with known FeLV-infected cats, vaccination should be undertaken. Two pentavalent vaccines containing inactivated whole-FeLV are currently available in Australia, whereas no FeLV vaccine is currently available in New Zealand. Given the unavailability of monovalent FeLV vaccines, we endorse the use of a pentavalent vaccine in Australia only in FeLV-endemic catteries or in situations where there is a demonstrable and substantial risk of FeLV exposure. Manufacturers are encouraged to reintroduce efficacious monovalent FeLV vaccines in Australia and New Zealand. Further research into potential antiretroviral therapy to treat FeLV infections in cats is needed.
{"title":"Feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection in domestic pet cats in Australia and New Zealand: Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and management","authors":"ME Westman, SJ Coggins, M van Dorsselaer, JM Norris, RA Squires, M Thompson, R Malik","doi":"10.1111/avj.13470","DOIUrl":"10.1111/avj.13470","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Progressive feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection dramatically shortens the lives of infected cats, causing acquired immunodeficiency, aplastic anaemia, lymphoma, leukaemia and other myeloproliferative diseases. The potential impact of regressive FeLV infection on the development of disease remains largely unknown, although there is evidence it contributes to lymphoma development. Despite a perception that there has been a general decline in the incidence of progressive FeLV infection in Australia and New Zealand, it remains an important health threat and the risk of infection should not be ignored. Clinicians should therefore have a thorough understanding of the complexities surrounding the diagnosis, management and prevention of this disease. Point-of-care (PoC) antigen testing using whole blood is the first step to detect progressive FeLV infection. Clinicians should remember the increased rate of false-positive results using such kits when the disease being detected is at a low prevalence. We therefore advise that confirmatory FeLV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to detect proviral DNA is essential before a PoC-positive cat can be confirmed as being FeLV-infected. Critically, progressively infected cats should not be euthanased because of a positive FeLV diagnosis, as some cats will remain healthy for many years. Regressively infected cats should not be used as blood donors, so blood donor programmes should include FeLV antigen and provirus PCR testing in their standard screening protocols. No cure currently exists for progressive or regressive FeLV infection; therefore, veterinarians should advocate to minimise the exposure of cats to FeLV as a first-line preventative strategy. The most reliable way to achieve this is for cats to be kept indoors, or with secured outdoor access (e.g., cat enclosures and secure gardens). Cats kept in this manner do not require FeLV vaccination. All animal holding facilities should aim to individually house untested adult cats to limit the spread of FeLV infection. For at-risk cats that cannot be kept indoors/enclosed, or for cats that live together with known FeLV-infected cats, vaccination should be undertaken. Two pentavalent vaccines containing inactivated whole-FeLV are currently available in Australia, whereas no FeLV vaccine is currently available in New Zealand. Given the unavailability of monovalent FeLV vaccines, we endorse the use of a pentavalent vaccine in Australia only in FeLV-endemic catteries or in situations where there is a demonstrable and substantial risk of FeLV exposure. Manufacturers are encouraged to reintroduce efficacious monovalent FeLV vaccines in Australia and New Zealand. Further research into potential antiretroviral therapy to treat FeLV infections in cats is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":"103 10","pages":"617-635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avj.13470","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144726965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}