American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions最新文献

Delivery of therapeutic genes to the lungs is an attractive strategy to correct a variety of pulmonary dysfunctions such as cystic fibrosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, pulmonary hypertension, asthma, and lung cancer. Different delivery routes such as intratracheal instillation, aerosol and intravenous injection have been utilized with varying degrees of efficiency. Both viral and non-viral vectors, with their respective strengths and weaknesses, have achieved significant levels of transgene expression in the lungs. However, the application of gene therapy for the treatment of pulmonary disease has been handicapped by various barriers to the delivery vectors such as serum proteins during intravenous delivery, and surfactant proteins and mucus in the airway lumen during topical application of therapeutic genes. Immune and cytokine responses against the delivery vehicle are also major problems encountered in pulmonary gene therapy. Despite these shortcomings much progress has been made to enhance the efficiency, as well as lower the toxicity of gene therapy vehicles in the treatment of pulmonary disorders such as cystic fibrosis, lung cancer and asthma.

Evidence suggests that allergy is a significant triggering factor in asthma in children and adults alike. In immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated allergic reactions, sensitization occurs when allergen-specific B cells are stimulated and switched to IgE antibody production by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 provided by helper T cells type 2 (Th2). The IgE antibodies act by arming cells bearing either the high-affinity (FcepsilonRI) or low-affinity (FcepsilonRII or CD23) receptor. The subsequent interaction of allergen with IgE-FcepsilonRI complexes on mast cells and basophils causes cross-linking of receptors that triggers the release of a variety of inflammatory mediators, cytokines and chemokines. Therefore, the ability to lower circulating free IgE levels is desirable because most individuals are exposed to multiple allergens to which they are sensitive at any given time. Omalizumab (formerly known as rhuMAb-E25) is a recently developed humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody directed at the FcepsilonRI binding domain of human IgE. It inhibits binding of IgE to mast cells without provoking mast cell activation. Preliminary clinical data from randomized controlled trials have shown that the addition of omalizumab to standard asthma therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid and rescue medication use. The compound is also well tolerated. Omalizumab represents a novel therapeutic approach in the management of asthma.

A spectrum of anti-inflammatory properties, evidence of anti-infective action against Pseudomonas aeruginosa at sub-inhibitory concentrations and positive clinical experience in patients with diffuse panbronchiolitis, a disease with features in common with cystic fibrosis (CF), has prompted research to evaluate the role of macrolide therapy in patients with CF. Newer macrolides such as azithromycin have the advantage of improved tolerability and a prolonged intracellular half-life requiring an infrequent dosing regimen. Results from initial studies suggest a benefit from several months of macrolide therapy in patients with CF. An improvement in lung function was initially shown in a small open study in children, while maintenance of lung function compared with placebo, reduced acute respiratory exacerbations, and reduced systemic markers of inflammation were demonstrated in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of macrolide therapy in adult patients with CF. Additional controlled studies are required to determine optimal drug, dosage, and duration of therapy, and long-term adverse effects of prolonged therapy with macrolides in patients with CF. The potential, with long-term use, to induce resistance against other bacteria colonizing the upper respiratory tract e.g. pneumococci has not been explored. Measurement of cytokines and inflammatory mediators from the sputum of patients with CF is technically difficult and does not correlate with disease activity. There is a need for easily measurable, reproducible and clinically meaningful end-points for evaluation of new therapies in CF. The choice of appropriate outcome measures, apart from lung function, to monitor disease activity needs careful consideration in clinical trials determining the efficacy of macrolides in patients with CF. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of macrolides in the treatment of CF are not expected for some years although macrolides are already being prescribed for long-term use in some centers. There is a need for further research into mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action of macrolides in the lungs of patients with CF and whether or not such therapy may be beneficial in the long term.

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. It has been shown that when treated in its early stages, survival rates improve. Despite this, controversy remains regarding screening for the early detection of lung cancer, primarily because mortality reductions were not observed in the trials that studied chest x-ray and sputum cytology. Nevertheless, renewed interest in screening, due in part to better screening options, has prompted further research exploring the potential cost-effectiveness of implementing lung cancer screening programs. This article provides a critical review of the literature of economic evaluations of lung cancer screening programs. The focus of this review is the methodology implemented in these studies. Based on an electronic search of the literature (Pubmed, Medline and CancerLit) from Sep 1988-Sep 2001, seven articles that quantified the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening programs were identified. For most of the studies, the cost-effectiveness aspect was a minor component with little or no description of the methods. Although some studies focused more on estimating the economic efficiency of screening, their methodology was weak and still not well documented. Only two studies implemented fully a cost-effectiveness analysis and provided the necessary level of detail. If consensus can be reached regarding the clinical benefit of lung cancer screening, future studies related to cost-effectiveness would have to be implemented on much sounder methodology. The publications reviewed do provide preliminary support for the economic efficiency of screening for lung cancer.

The idea of studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in order to predict their efficacy has long been of interest. Traditionally, serum drug concentrations have been evaluated against the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a given pathogen; however, infection site-specific data continue to gain interest from clinicians. Despite methodological limitations, progress in techniques has improved the clinical significance of data generated. Rather than using tissue homogenates which fail to differentiate between interstitial and intracellular concentrations, newer collection techniques focus on sampling of matrices that allow for this differentiation. These collection techniques now allow one to accurately describe beta-lactam and aminoglycoside interstitial penetrations, as well as, the interstitial and phagocytic concentrations of macrolides and fluoroquinolones. By using these specific data and the MICs of infecting pathogens, it is hoped that conclusions can be drawn by a clinician as to the appropriateness of the choice of an antibacterial.

Unlabelled: Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist which is used as a preventive treatment for persistent asthma in patients > or =2 years of age. In children aged 6 to 14 years montelukast (5 mg/day) treatment resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, primary clinical outcome) during an 8-week randomized, double-blind trial. Moreover, significant improvements were observed for a range of secondary endpoints assessing symptoms, exacerbation rates, beta-agonist usage and quality of life. Concomitant administration of montelukast (5 mg/day) and inhaled budesonide (200 microg twice daily) resulted in a trend towards an increase in FEV1 (p=0.06, primary endpoint) and a statistically significant reduction in both as-needed beta2-agonist usage and the percentage of days with asthma exacerbations compared with budesonide plus placebo. No significant differences were observed in asthma-related quality of life between the two groups. During clinical trials both improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage were generally observed within 1 day after initiation of therapy in children 2 to 14 years of age with persistent asthma. Data from a randomized, nonblind trial in 6- to 11-year-old children and a 6-month extension to this trial suggest that both compliance to therapy and patient satisfaction are greater for montelukast than for either inhaled cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate) or inhaled beclomethasone. In addition, patients and parents preferred oral montelukast over cromolyn sodium. In 2- to 5-year-old children with persistent asthma, montelukast (4 mg/day) treatment resulted in significant improvements in a range of outcomes, such as as-needed beta2-agonist usage, symptom scores and percentage of days with asthma symptoms, as assessed during a randomized, double-blind trial primarily designed to assess tolerability. Data from small randomized, double-blind trials suggest that montelukast reduces exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children. Montelukast is generally well tolerated. The frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated children of all ages was comparable to that in patients receiving placebo.

Conclusion: Oral montelukast has shown efficacy as a preventive treatment for asthma during clinical trials in children aged 2 to 14 years. The drug offers benefits over more standard therapies such as inhaled cromolyn sodium and nedocromil in terms of compliance and convenience. In addition, the drug offers significant benefits when added to inhaled corticosteroids (according to secondary endpoints). Montelukast offers an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option for children with asthma.