American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions最新文献

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate and is inhaled via the Diskus powder inhaler. In three randomized, double-blind, 24-week or 52-week studies in >2850 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg twice daily (in one study) and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 microg twice daily (in the other studies) provided greater improvement in lung function than placebo or either component alone at the same nominal dosage. Both strengths of the combination product administered twice daily resulted in clinically meaningful increases in scores in health-related quality-of-life questionnaires that were specific for respiratory disease. Improvements in this and almost all other secondary measures of efficacy, including symptomatic outcomes, were significantly greater with the combination product than with placebo. Administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate as a combination product did not result in any untoward interactions that affected the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic or tolerability profiles of the individual components. Candidiasis, hoarseness/dysphonia, throat irritation and headache occurred more frequently with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with placebo in patients with COPD.

Diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB) is characterized by chronic sinobronchial infection and diffuse bilateral micronodular pulmonary lesions consisting of inflammatory cells. Studies on disease etiology point to a genetic predisposition unique to Asians. Early therapy for DPB was largely symptomatic. The advent of macrolide antibiotics, including erythromycin, roxithromycin and clarithromycin, has strikingly changed disease prognosis. Low-dose, long-term macrolide therapy for DPB originated from detailed observations of response to therapy in a single patient. The bactericidal activity of macrolides, particularly erythromycin, is not a significant factor for their clinical efficacy in DPB. Firstly, irrespective of bacterial clearance, clinical improvement is observed in patients treated with erythromycin. Secondly, even in cases with bacterial superinfection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to macrolides, treatment has proved effective. Thirdly, the recommended dosage of macrolides produces peak levels in tissue that are below the minimum inhibitory concentrations for major pathogenic bacteria that colonize the airway. In the last two decades, the possible mechanism underlying the effectiveness of macrolide therapy has been extensively studied. The proposed mechanism of action includes inhibition of excessive mucus and water secretion from the airway epithelium, inhibition of neutrophil accumulation in the large airway, inhibition of lymphocyte and macrophage accumulation around the small airway, and modulation of bacterial virulence. The great success of macrolide therapy in diffuse panbronchiolitis may extend its application to the treatment of other chronic inflammatory disorders. If the anti-inflammatory activity of macrolides is independent of their bactericidal effect, new anti-inflammatory macrolides without antimicrobial activity should be developed to minimize emergence of macrolide-resistant micro-organisms.

Asthma is orchestrated by cytokine products of activated T cells. Glucocorticoids are thought to ameliorate asthma at least partly through T cell inhibition. Consequently, other T cell immunomodulatory agents have been assessed for asthma therapy. Since these agents may have serious unwanted effects, attention has been focused on patients with severe asthma refractory to maximal topical, and additional systemic glucocorticoid therapy. Although gold salts show a modest but significant glucocorticoid-sparing effect in severe asthma, lung function is not improved and not all patients respond. The minimum duration of a valid trial of therapy is probably 6 months. Unwanted effects include dermatitis, hepatic dysfunction, proteinuria and interstitial pneumonitis. Meta-analysis of trials of methotrexate in oral glucocorticoid-dependent asthma have confirmed that concomitant weekly methotrexate for a minimum of 3 to 6 months enables significant (approximately 20%) overall reduction in oral glucocorticoid requirements, although only approximately 60% of patients show a significant response. There is little effect on lung function. Blood count and liver function must be monitored. Opportunistic infection is rare but potentially fatal. Cyclosporine, administered for at least 3 months, is effective in only a proportion of patients with oral glucocorticoid-dependent asthma, where it may improve disease severity and/or enable oral glucocorticoid dosage reductions. Regular monitoring of renal function, blood pressure and blood concentrations of cyclosporine is required. The evidence that intravenous immunoglobulin (Ig) is of any benefit in patients with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma is at present equivocal. The therapy is expensive and associated with a high incidence of unwanted effects (fever, aseptic meningitis, urticaria). The macrolides tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) have end effects similar to those of cyclosporine. Brequinar sodium, mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide are inhibitors of de novo synthesis of pyrimidines and purines, to which T cells are particularly sensitive. Such drugs may in theory be beneficial for therapy of patients with oral glucocorticoid-dependent asthma. Humanized anti-CD4, anti-IgE and anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibodies, and other cytokine inhibitors such as soluble IL-4 receptor have entered early trials. The worth of current immunomodulatory drugs is limited since: (i) not all patients respond, and response cannot be predicted a priori; (ii) the high incidence of unwanted effects makes it difficult to assess overall benefit/risk ratios; (iii) there is increased risk of opportunistic infection and (theoretically) neoplasia; (iv) there are many relative and absolute contraindications to therapy; and (v) there is lack of knowledge about the long-term effects, beneficial or otherwise, of therapy.

Leukotrienes have been known in the field of immunology since the 1930s. At that time they were referred to as the slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis. They were not, however, characterized until the 1980s, when they were noted to be formed during the breakdown of arachidonic acid by the enzyme 5-lipoxygenase. The leukotrienes consist of leukotriene (LT) A4, LTB4, LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4, so named because the molecule was originally isolated from leukocytes and therefore its carbon backbone contains three double bonds in series, which constitutes a trion. This structural information provided the key to the oxidative pathway of lipometabolism, known as the 5-lipoxygenase. Leukotrienes are classified as inflammatory mediators, and therefore they are produced by a number of cell types, particularly mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, macrophages and monocytes. With the identification of asthma, allergic rhinitis and paranasal sinusitis associated with inflammatory pathways, the leukotrienes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of these conditions and have become targets for therapeutic modulation. Leukotriene synthesis inhibitors have been used successfully in the treatment of patients with asthma where they have demonstrated the ability to induce bronchial dilatation, provide protection against broncho-provocation tests and significantly diminish symptoms. When it was serendipitously noted that patients who had concomitant nasal pathology also showed improvement, leukotriene synthesis inhibitors were used as adjuvant therapy in the management of patients with rhinitis, sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Preliminary studies have demonstrated improvements in nasal airflow and reduced recurrence of nasal polyps as noted by endoscopy and imaging studies. Leukotriene synthesis inhibitors therefore appear to be a novel treatment modality for patients with rhinitis, sinusitis and nasal polyps when used as adjunctive therapy.

Objective and design: Measurement of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) may show benefits of asthma treatments not revealed by objective monitoring and can complement clinical and physiological assessments of treatment outcome. HR-QOL was measured in four countries in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination and budesonide in patients aged > or =12 years with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids.

Methods: Patients received, twice daily, either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg (Seretide/ Advair) via Diskus inhaler (n = 55) or budesonide 800 microg (Pulmicort) via Turbuhaler (n = 58). Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) at baseline and after 12 weeks treatment (or early withdrawal). The analysis included 113 patients.

Results: Mean improvement in AQLQ scores achieved clinical importance in all four domains in the salmeterol/fluticasone group (AQLQ change > or =0.5), but in only two domains in the budesonide group. Although the mean overall improvement in AQLQ scores observed in the salmeterol/fluticasone group was significantly greater than that observed in the budesonide group (difference of 0.45; p = 0.002), the difference was less than the minimal important difference (0.5). Nevertheless, further analysis showed that the number-needed-to-treat was only 3.4. This indicates that only 3.4 patients need to be treated with the salmeterol/fluticasone combination for one patient to experience a meaningful improvement in HR-QOL, relative to monotherapy with an increased dose of budesonide.

Conclusion: Treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate resulted in superior gains in HR-QOL relative to increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition which is particularly prevalent in patients with asthma and chronic cough. Physiologic changes caused by asthma and chronic cough promote acid reflux. GERD is also considered by many investigators as a factor contributing to airway inflammation. An etiological relationship between GERD and asthma/chronic cough and vice versa has been supported by a large number of experimental and clinical findings and refuted by others. Although further controlled studies are needed to clarify this relationship, GERD and asthma/chronic cough appear to be linked to each other. The association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough involves nerve reflexes, cytokines, inflammatory and neuroendocrine cells and, in some patients, tracheal aspiration of refluxing gastric fluids. GERD may present with typical symptoms but can also be asymptomatic. Sensitive methods for diagnosing GERD are available, which include esophageal pH monitoring, acid provocative tests, modified barium swallow and endoscopy. Consideration of the association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough is of practical value in the management of chronic cough or asthma resistant to treatment. Treatment of GERD in patients with asthma has been consistently shown to improve respiratory symptoms but not necessarily pulmonary function tests. Surgical treatment can be a useful and cost-effective approach in selected patients with asthma and GERD.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic condition of unknown etiology with an unfavorable outcome from progressively deteriorating respiratory function, leading ultimately to death from respiratory failure. It is characterized by sequential acute lung injury resulting in progressive fixed tissue fibrosis, architectural distortion and loss of function. An excess of profibrotic cytokines and/or a deficiency in antifibrotic cytokines have been implicated in the pathological process as has excessive oxidation. IPF is distinguished from other forms of diffuse pulmonary fibrosis by the presence of the specific histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonitis. Oral corticosteroids are the usual treatment, but objective response rates are poor and good quality studies do not exist. Other therapies either alone or in combination with corticosteroids are widely used, including azathioprine, colchicine, cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. There is a paucity of good quality information regarding the effectiveness of most noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents. Older studies of lesser methodological quality have shown benefits from these drugs, generally when added to corticosteroids. Many were retrospective reviews or uncontrolled, nonrandomized, open-label, prospective studies and often included other histological patterns of disease which are now thought to respond better to immunosuppressive agents. The results of intervention with colchicine and azathioprine have been disappointing when assessed by good quality trials using modern diagnostic criteria. Modern high quality studies are lacking for several agents, notably cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. The older agents may yet prove to be effective but further good quality trials will be necessary to assess these agents adequately. Other new anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antifibrotic or anticytokine compounds are largely untried or unreported. One trial using interferon-gamma-1b showed a significant improvement in pulmonary function but there are concerns regarding the generalizability of this study. Pirfenidone, cyclosporine and acetylcysteine may also prove to be of benefit but current studies are of insufficient quality to allow for any conclusions to be drawn. Currently there is no good evidence to support the routine use of oral corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, penicillamine, colchicine, cyclosporine or any other immunosuppressive, antifibrotic or immunomodulatory agent in the management of IPF. Interferon, pirfenidone and other new agents may be of benefit but further studies are required. Any recommendations for treatment must therefore be made on an individual and empiric basis. As some other forms of pulmonary fibrosis may respond better to immunosuppressive agents, it remains important to make an accurate diagnosis, by open lung biopsy if necessary.