首页 > 最新文献

American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions最新文献

英文 中文
The etiology and management of pregnancy rhinitis. 妊娠鼻炎的病因及处理。
Eva K Ellegård

Pregnancy rhinitis is defined as nasal congestion in the last 6 or more weeks of pregnancy, without other signs of respiratory tract infection and with no known allergic cause, with complete resolution of symptoms within 2 weeks after delivery. Pregnancy rhinitis occurs in approximately one-fifth of pregnancies, can appear at almost any gestational week, and affects the woman and possibly also the fetus. The pathogenesis of pregnancy rhinitis is not clear, but placental growth hormone is suggested to be involved. Smoking and sensitization to house dust mites are probable risk factors. It is often difficult to make a differential diagnosis from sinusitis: nasendoscopy of a decongested nose is the diagnostic method of choice. In some cases ultrasound or x-ray may be necessary. Sinusitis should be treated aggressively with increased doses of beta-lactam antibiotics and antral irrigation. Nasal decongestants give good temporary relief from pregnancy rhinitis, but they tend to be overused, leading to the development of rhinitis medicamentosa. Corticosteroids have not been shown to be effective in pregnancy rhinitis, and their systemic administration should be avoided during pregnancy. Nasal corticosteroids may be administered to pregnant women when indicated for other sorts of rhinitis. Nasal alar dilators and saline washings are safe means to relieve nasal congestion, but the ultimate treatment for pregnancy rhinitis remains to be found.

妊娠期鼻炎定义为妊娠最后6周或更长时间内出现鼻塞,无其他呼吸道感染体征,无已知过敏原因,分娩后2周内症状完全消退。妊娠鼻炎发生在大约五分之一的妊娠中,几乎可以在任何妊娠周出现,并影响妇女和胎儿。妊娠期鼻炎的发病机制尚不清楚,但可能与胎盘生长激素有关。吸烟和对室内尘螨过敏是可能的危险因素。鼻窦炎通常很难鉴别诊断:鼻塞减充血的鼻内窥镜检查是诊断方法的选择。在某些情况下,超声波或x射线可能是必要的。鼻窦炎应积极治疗,增加剂量的-内酰胺类抗生素和窦灌洗。鼻减充血剂对妊娠鼻炎有很好的暂时缓解作用,但它们往往被过度使用,导致鼻炎药物性发展。皮质类固醇尚未被证明对妊娠鼻炎有效,在妊娠期间应避免全身使用。当有其他类型鼻炎的适应症时,可给孕妇使用鼻皮质类固醇。鼻翼扩张器和生理盐水冲洗是缓解鼻塞的安全方法,但妊娠鼻炎的最终治疗方法仍有待发现。
{"title":"The etiology and management of pregnancy rhinitis.","authors":"Eva K Ellegård","doi":"10.1007/BF03256674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnancy rhinitis is defined as nasal congestion in the last 6 or more weeks of pregnancy, without other signs of respiratory tract infection and with no known allergic cause, with complete resolution of symptoms within 2 weeks after delivery. Pregnancy rhinitis occurs in approximately one-fifth of pregnancies, can appear at almost any gestational week, and affects the woman and possibly also the fetus. The pathogenesis of pregnancy rhinitis is not clear, but placental growth hormone is suggested to be involved. Smoking and sensitization to house dust mites are probable risk factors. It is often difficult to make a differential diagnosis from sinusitis: nasendoscopy of a decongested nose is the diagnostic method of choice. In some cases ultrasound or x-ray may be necessary. Sinusitis should be treated aggressively with increased doses of beta-lactam antibiotics and antral irrigation. Nasal decongestants give good temporary relief from pregnancy rhinitis, but they tend to be overused, leading to the development of rhinitis medicamentosa. Corticosteroids have not been shown to be effective in pregnancy rhinitis, and their systemic administration should be avoided during pregnancy. Nasal corticosteroids may be administered to pregnant women when indicated for other sorts of rhinitis. Nasal alar dilators and saline washings are safe means to relieve nasal congestion, but the ultimate treatment for pregnancy rhinitis remains to be found.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"2 6","pages":"469-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256674","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
Preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: therapeutic potential of mucolytic agents. 预防慢性支气管炎和慢性阻塞性肺病的恶化:黏液溶解剂的治疗潜力。
Phillippa J Poole, Peter N Black

It is important to find interventions that will reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD, because of their effect on morbidity and healthcare expenditure. A Cochrane systematic review included 23 studies that had evaluated the effects of treatment with mucolytic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Mucolytic treatment was associated with a significant reduction of 0.79 exacerbations per patient per year compared with placebo, a 29% decrease. Patients who received treatment with mucolytic agents were twice as likely to remain exacerbation-free in the study period than if they had received placebo, with six patients needing regular treatment with mucolytic agents for 3-6 months to achieve one less exacerbation over that time. Treatment with mucolytic agents resulted in nearly 7 days less illness per patient per year. How mucolytic agents work is unknown, although they may reduce exacerbations by altering mucus production, antioxidation, or antibacterial or immunostimulatory effects. They do not appear to affect the decline in lung function that occurs in COPD. The treatment appears to be without any adverse effects, apart from the need to take oral medication daily. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the point at which the costs of treatment and non-treatment were equal was 1.2 less exacerbations per year. This is higher than the effect observed in the Cochrane review, suggesting that treating everyone with COPD with mucolytic agents would not be cost effective. Those with more frequent and severe exacerbations appear to have the most to gain.

由于干预措施对发病率和卫生保健支出的影响,找到能够降低COPD恶化频率和严重程度的干预措施是很重要的。Cochrane系统回顾纳入了23项研究,这些研究评估了溶黏液剂治疗慢性支气管炎或COPD患者的效果。与安慰剂相比,黏液溶解治疗与每位患者每年0.79次恶化的显著减少相关,减少了29%。在研究期间,接受黏液溶解剂治疗的患者保持无恶化的可能性是接受安慰剂治疗的两倍,有6名患者需要接受3-6个月的黏液溶解剂常规治疗,以在此期间减少一次恶化。使用黏液溶解剂治疗,每位患者每年的患病天数减少了近7天。黏液溶解剂的作用机制尚不清楚,但它们可能通过改变黏液生成、抗氧化、抗菌或免疫刺激作用来减少病情恶化。它们似乎不会影响COPD患者肺功能的下降。除了需要每天口服药物外,这种治疗似乎没有任何副作用。成本效益分析表明,治疗和非治疗费用相等的点是每年减少1.2次恶化。这比Cochrane综述中观察到的效果要高,表明用溶黏液剂治疗所有COPD患者并不具有成本效益。那些病情更频繁和更严重的人似乎获益最多。
{"title":"Preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: therapeutic potential of mucolytic agents.","authors":"Phillippa J Poole,&nbsp;Peter N Black","doi":"10.1007/BF03256664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is important to find interventions that will reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD, because of their effect on morbidity and healthcare expenditure. A Cochrane systematic review included 23 studies that had evaluated the effects of treatment with mucolytic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Mucolytic treatment was associated with a significant reduction of 0.79 exacerbations per patient per year compared with placebo, a 29% decrease. Patients who received treatment with mucolytic agents were twice as likely to remain exacerbation-free in the study period than if they had received placebo, with six patients needing regular treatment with mucolytic agents for 3-6 months to achieve one less exacerbation over that time. Treatment with mucolytic agents resulted in nearly 7 days less illness per patient per year. How mucolytic agents work is unknown, although they may reduce exacerbations by altering mucus production, antioxidation, or antibacterial or immunostimulatory effects. They do not appear to affect the decline in lung function that occurs in COPD. The treatment appears to be without any adverse effects, apart from the need to take oral medication daily. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the point at which the costs of treatment and non-treatment were equal was 1.2 less exacerbations per year. This is higher than the effect observed in the Cochrane review, suggesting that treating everyone with COPD with mucolytic agents would not be cost effective. Those with more frequent and severe exacerbations appear to have the most to gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"2 5","pages":"367-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256664","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Flunisolide HFA Flunisolide HFA
Richard J Martin
{"title":"Flunisolide HFA","authors":"Richard J Martin","doi":"10.1007/BF03256631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256631","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256631","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52217466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Flunisolide HFA Flunisolide HFA
O. D. Wolthers
{"title":"Flunisolide HFA","authors":"O. D. Wolthers","doi":"10.1007/bf03256632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03256632","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/bf03256632","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52217624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合治疗
N. Hanania
{"title":"Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"N. Hanania","doi":"10.1007/BF03256621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256621","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"229 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256621","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52217144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合治疗
D. Mahler
{"title":"Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"D. Mahler","doi":"10.1007/BF03256620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256620","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256620","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52216977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合治疗
W. Backer
{"title":"Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"W. Backer","doi":"10.1007/BF03256619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256619","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256619","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52216944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beta2-agonist eutomers: a rational option for the treatment of asthma? β -受体激动剂:治疗哮喘的合理选择?
David W Boulton, J Paul Fawcett

Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as albuterol (salbutamol) and terbutaline and their long-acting analogs salmeterol and formoterol are widely used as bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma. They are chiral drugs historically marketed as racemic mixtures of an active (eutomer) and essentially inactive (distomer) stereoisomer. Despite their obvious therapeutic value and widespread use, beta2-agonists have been implicated, somewhat controversially, in causing an increase in asthma mortality and a deterioration of asthma control by a mechanism that remains elusive. Inherent toxicity of the distomers has been widely touted as an explanation and has given rise to pressure for the replacement of the racemates with pure eutomer formulations (the so-called chiral or racemic switch). This has culminated in the recent introduction into clinical practice of the single active stereoisomer of albuterol (levalbuterol) and the promise of other pure beta2-agonist eutomer formulations to follow. This article examines the evidence on which these chiral switches are based. Clinical studies designed to reveal negative effects of beta2-agonists have searched for reductions in lung function, increases in airway responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor mediators and worsening of asthma control. Crossover studies administering the pure stereoisomers and racemate of albuterol have not shown a clear superiority of the pure eutomer formulation over the racemate in terms of either bronchial hyperresponsiveness, tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotective effects or improvements in lung function. Clinical toxicity of beta2-agonist distomers on any aspect of asthmatic lung function has also not been demonstrated in the relatively short-term inhalational studies (single dose or repeated dose studies <1 week) that have been carried out. In animal studies, the administration of beta2-agonist racemates and distomers has been shown to enhance bronchial hyperresponsiveness but only in ovalbumin-sensitized animals where the relevance to humans is questionable. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of beta(2)-agonist stereoisomers appear to be essentially similar whether administered as single stereoisomers or as racemates. Levalbuterol may be slightly more potent than an equivalent dose given as racemate, but there is some evidence that it forms a small amount of the distomer in vivo which detracts somewhat from its purported benefits over use of the racemate. Whilst there remains a clear need for studies of longer duration with sensitive clinical endpoints to evaluate the benefits of beta2-agonist eutomers and to investigate distomer toxicity, the chiral switch for beta2-agonists in general, and for albuterol in particular, does not appear to be justified on the basis of the evidence available to date.

β 2-肾上腺素受体激动剂(β 2-激动剂)如沙丁胺醇和特布他林及其长效类似物沙美特罗和福莫特罗被广泛用作支气管扩张剂治疗哮喘。它们是手性药物,历史上作为活性(同聚体)和非活性(异聚体)立体异构体的外消旋混合物销售。尽管β 2激动剂具有明显的治疗价值和广泛的应用,但其引起哮喘死亡率增加和哮喘控制恶化的机制仍不明确,这在一定程度上存在争议。二消体的固有毒性已被广泛吹捧为一种解释,并引起了用纯自聚体代替外消旋体的压力(所谓的手性或外消旋开关)。这在最近沙丁胺醇的单一活性立体异构体(左旋沙丁胺醇)引入临床实践以及其他纯β - 2激动剂自聚体制剂的前景中达到高潮。本文考察了这些手性开关所依据的证据。临床研究旨在揭示β 2激动剂的负面影响,研究发现肺功能降低,气道对支气管收缩介质的反应性增加,哮喘控制恶化。交叉研究表明,沙丁胺醇的纯立体异构体和外消旋体制剂在支气管高反应性、支气管保护作用的快速反应或肺功能改善方面没有明显优于外消旋体制剂。在相对短期的吸入性研究(单次给药或重复给药研究)中,β 2激动剂对哮喘肺功能的任何方面的临床毒性也未得到证实
{"title":"Beta2-agonist eutomers: a rational option for the treatment of asthma?","authors":"David W Boulton,&nbsp;J Paul Fawcett","doi":"10.1007/BF03256624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as albuterol (salbutamol) and terbutaline and their long-acting analogs salmeterol and formoterol are widely used as bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma. They are chiral drugs historically marketed as racemic mixtures of an active (eutomer) and essentially inactive (distomer) stereoisomer. Despite their obvious therapeutic value and widespread use, beta2-agonists have been implicated, somewhat controversially, in causing an increase in asthma mortality and a deterioration of asthma control by a mechanism that remains elusive. Inherent toxicity of the distomers has been widely touted as an explanation and has given rise to pressure for the replacement of the racemates with pure eutomer formulations (the so-called chiral or racemic switch). This has culminated in the recent introduction into clinical practice of the single active stereoisomer of albuterol (levalbuterol) and the promise of other pure beta2-agonist eutomer formulations to follow. This article examines the evidence on which these chiral switches are based. Clinical studies designed to reveal negative effects of beta2-agonists have searched for reductions in lung function, increases in airway responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor mediators and worsening of asthma control. Crossover studies administering the pure stereoisomers and racemate of albuterol have not shown a clear superiority of the pure eutomer formulation over the racemate in terms of either bronchial hyperresponsiveness, tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotective effects or improvements in lung function. Clinical toxicity of beta2-agonist distomers on any aspect of asthmatic lung function has also not been demonstrated in the relatively short-term inhalational studies (single dose or repeated dose studies <1 week) that have been carried out. In animal studies, the administration of beta2-agonist racemates and distomers has been shown to enhance bronchial hyperresponsiveness but only in ovalbumin-sensitized animals where the relevance to humans is questionable. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of beta(2)-agonist stereoisomers appear to be essentially similar whether administered as single stereoisomers or as racemates. Levalbuterol may be slightly more potent than an equivalent dose given as racemate, but there is some evidence that it forms a small amount of the distomer in vivo which detracts somewhat from its purported benefits over use of the racemate. Whilst there remains a clear need for studies of longer duration with sensitive clinical endpoints to evaluate the benefits of beta2-agonist eutomers and to investigate distomer toxicity, the chiral switch for beta2-agonists in general, and for albuterol in particular, does not appear to be justified on the basis of the evidence available to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 5","pages":"305-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256624","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Adult respiratory distress syndrome: do selective anticoagulants help? 成人呼吸窘迫综合征:选择性抗凝剂有帮助吗?
Steven Idell

The adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a form of acute lung injury that is characterized by florid extravascular fibrin deposition. Thrombosis in the pulmonary vasculature and disseminated intravascular coagulation have also been observed in association with ARDS. Fibrin deposition does not occur in the normal lung but is virtually universal in acute lung injury induced by disparate insults. A large body of basic and preclinical evidence further implicates abnormalities of pathways of fibrin turnover in the pathogenesis of acute inflammation and fibrotic repair. Coagulation is locally upregulated in the injured lung, while fibrinolytic activity is depressed. These abnormalities occur concurrently and favor alveolar fibrin deposition. The systemic derangements of fibrin turnover in sepsis are similar to those that occur in the injured lung. Recent clinical trials demonstrate that interventions using selective anticoagulation can provide a mortality advantage and that selective anticoagulants differ in their ability to provide clinical benefit. Preclinical trials in primates with sepsis-induced ARDS now indicate that anticoagulant interventions that block the extrinsic coagulation pathway can protect against the development of pulmonary fibrin deposition as well as lung dysfunction and acute inflammation. These observations provide proof of principle that key steps in the coagulation cascade are appropriate therapeutic targets to prevent the development of acute lung injury in ARDS. Ongoing studies and prior publications also support the hypothesis that reversal of the fibrinolytic defect in ARDS could protect against the development of acute lung injury. In all, these studies suggest that fibrin deposition in the injured lung as well as abnormalities of coagulation and fibrinolysis are integral to the pathogenesis of ARDS. The ability of selective anticoagulants to effectively and safely alter clinical outcome in ARDS remains to be determined.

成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种急性肺损伤的形式,其特征是丰富的血管外纤维蛋白沉积。肺血管内血栓形成和弥散性血管内凝血也被观察到与ARDS有关。纤维蛋白沉积不发生在正常肺中,但在不同损伤引起的急性肺损伤中几乎普遍存在。大量的基础和临床前证据进一步表明,在急性炎症和纤维化修复的发病机制中,纤维蛋白转换途径的异常。损伤肺局部凝血功能上调,而纤溶活性降低。这些异常同时发生,有利于肺泡纤维蛋白沉积。脓毒症中纤维蛋白转换的全身性紊乱与损伤肺中发生的紊乱相似。最近的临床试验表明,使用选择性抗凝的干预措施可以提供死亡率优势,选择性抗凝剂在提供临床益处的能力方面存在差异。在败血症诱导的ARDS灵长类动物中进行的临床前试验表明,阻断外源性凝血途径的抗凝干预可以防止肺纤维蛋白沉积、肺功能障碍和急性炎症的发生。这些观察结果为凝血级联的关键步骤是预防ARDS急性肺损伤发展的适当治疗靶点提供了原理证明。正在进行的研究和先前的出版物也支持这样的假设,即逆转ARDS的纤溶缺陷可以防止急性肺损伤的发展。综上所述,这些研究表明,损伤肺中的纤维蛋白沉积以及凝血和纤维蛋白溶解异常是ARDS发病机制的组成部分。选择性抗凝剂有效和安全地改变ARDS临床结局的能力仍有待确定。
{"title":"Adult respiratory distress syndrome: do selective anticoagulants help?","authors":"Steven Idell","doi":"10.1007/BF03257165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a form of acute lung injury that is characterized by florid extravascular fibrin deposition. Thrombosis in the pulmonary vasculature and disseminated intravascular coagulation have also been observed in association with ARDS. Fibrin deposition does not occur in the normal lung but is virtually universal in acute lung injury induced by disparate insults. A large body of basic and preclinical evidence further implicates abnormalities of pathways of fibrin turnover in the pathogenesis of acute inflammation and fibrotic repair. Coagulation is locally upregulated in the injured lung, while fibrinolytic activity is depressed. These abnormalities occur concurrently and favor alveolar fibrin deposition. The systemic derangements of fibrin turnover in sepsis are similar to those that occur in the injured lung. Recent clinical trials demonstrate that interventions using selective anticoagulation can provide a mortality advantage and that selective anticoagulants differ in their ability to provide clinical benefit. Preclinical trials in primates with sepsis-induced ARDS now indicate that anticoagulant interventions that block the extrinsic coagulation pathway can protect against the development of pulmonary fibrin deposition as well as lung dysfunction and acute inflammation. These observations provide proof of principle that key steps in the coagulation cascade are appropriate therapeutic targets to prevent the development of acute lung injury in ARDS. Ongoing studies and prior publications also support the hypothesis that reversal of the fibrinolytic defect in ARDS could protect against the development of acute lung injury. In all, these studies suggest that fibrin deposition in the injured lung as well as abnormalities of coagulation and fibrinolysis are integral to the pathogenesis of ARDS. The ability of selective anticoagulants to effectively and safely alter clinical outcome in ARDS remains to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 6","pages":"383-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03257165","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates: a comparative review. 表面活性剂治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较综述。
Sean B Ainsworth, David W A Milligan

Exogenous surfactant therapy has been part of the routine care of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) since the beginning of the 1990s. Discoveries that led to its development as a therapeutic agent span the whole of the 20th century but it was not until 1980 that the first successful use of exogenous surfactant therapy in a human population was reported. Since then, randomized controlled studies demonstrated that surfactant therapy was not only well tolerated but that it significantly reduced both neonatal mortality and pulmonary air leaks; importantly, those surviving neonates were not at greater risk of subsequent neurological impairment. Surfactants may be of animal or synthetic origin. Both types of surfactants have been extensively studied in animal models and in clinical trials to determine the optimum timing, dose size and frequency, route and method of administration. The advantages of one type of surfactant over another are discussed in relation to biophysical properties, animal studies and results of randomized trials in neonatal populations. Animal-derived exogenous surfactants are the treatment of choice at the present time with relatively few adverse effects related largely to changes in oxygenation and heart rate during surfactant administration. The optimum dose of surfactant is usually 100 mg/kg. The use of surfactant with high frequency oscillation and continuous positive pressure modes of respiratory support presents different problems compared with its use with conventional ventilation. The different components of surfactant have important functions that influence its effectiveness both in the primary function of the reduction of surface tension and also in secondary, but nonetheless just as important, role of lung defense. With greater understanding of the individual surfactant components, particularly the surfactant-associated proteins, development of newer synthetic surfactants has been made possible. Despite being an effective therapy for RDS, surfactant has failed to have a significant impact on the incidence of chronic lung disease in survivors. Paradoxically the cost of care has increased as surviving neonates are more immature and consume a greater proportion of neonatal intensive care resources. Despite this, surfactant is considered a cost-effective therapy for RDS compared with other therapeutic interventions in premature infants.

自20世纪90年代初以来,外源性表面活性剂治疗已成为早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)常规护理的一部分。导致其发展成为一种治疗剂的发现跨越了整个20世纪,但直到1980年才首次成功地在人群中使用外源性表面活性剂治疗。从那时起,随机对照研究表明,表面活性剂治疗不仅耐受性良好,而且显著降低新生儿死亡率和肺漏气;重要的是,那些存活下来的新生儿随后出现神经损伤的风险并不大。表面活性剂可能来源于动物或人工合成。这两种类型的表面活性剂已在动物模型和临床试验中进行了广泛的研究,以确定最佳的时间、剂量大小和频率、给药途径和方法。本文讨论了一种表面活性剂相对于另一种表面活性剂的生物物理特性、动物研究和新生儿随机试验的结果。动物源性外源性表面活性剂是目前的首选治疗方法,其副作用相对较少,主要与表面活性剂给药期间氧合和心率的变化有关。表面活性剂的最佳用量通常为100mg /kg。使用具有高频振荡和连续正压模式的表面活性剂进行呼吸支持与使用常规通气相比存在不同的问题。表面活性剂的不同成分具有重要的功能,影响其降低表面张力的主要功能和肺部防御的次要功能,但同样重要。随着对各个表面活性剂组分,特别是与表面活性剂相关的蛋白质的进一步了解,开发新的合成表面活性剂成为可能。尽管表面活性剂是一种有效的治疗RDS的方法,但它未能对幸存者慢性肺病的发病率产生显著影响。矛盾的是,随着存活下来的新生儿更加不成熟,并且消耗了新生儿重症监护资源的更大比例,护理成本也增加了。尽管如此,与其他早产儿治疗干预措施相比,表面活性剂被认为是一种具有成本效益的治疗RDS的方法。
{"title":"Surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates: a comparative review.","authors":"Sean B Ainsworth,&nbsp;David W A Milligan","doi":"10.1007/BF03257169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exogenous surfactant therapy has been part of the routine care of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) since the beginning of the 1990s. Discoveries that led to its development as a therapeutic agent span the whole of the 20th century but it was not until 1980 that the first successful use of exogenous surfactant therapy in a human population was reported. Since then, randomized controlled studies demonstrated that surfactant therapy was not only well tolerated but that it significantly reduced both neonatal mortality and pulmonary air leaks; importantly, those surviving neonates were not at greater risk of subsequent neurological impairment. Surfactants may be of animal or synthetic origin. Both types of surfactants have been extensively studied in animal models and in clinical trials to determine the optimum timing, dose size and frequency, route and method of administration. The advantages of one type of surfactant over another are discussed in relation to biophysical properties, animal studies and results of randomized trials in neonatal populations. Animal-derived exogenous surfactants are the treatment of choice at the present time with relatively few adverse effects related largely to changes in oxygenation and heart rate during surfactant administration. The optimum dose of surfactant is usually 100 mg/kg. The use of surfactant with high frequency oscillation and continuous positive pressure modes of respiratory support presents different problems compared with its use with conventional ventilation. The different components of surfactant have important functions that influence its effectiveness both in the primary function of the reduction of surface tension and also in secondary, but nonetheless just as important, role of lung defense. With greater understanding of the individual surfactant components, particularly the surfactant-associated proteins, development of newer synthetic surfactants has been made possible. Despite being an effective therapy for RDS, surfactant has failed to have a significant impact on the incidence of chronic lung disease in survivors. Paradoxically the cost of care has increased as surviving neonates are more immature and consume a greater proportion of neonatal intensive care resources. Despite this, surfactant is considered a cost-effective therapy for RDS compared with other therapeutic interventions in premature infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 6","pages":"417-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03257169","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
期刊
American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1