Second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonists are recognized as being highly effective treatments for allergic-based disease and are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in the world. The newer antihistamines represent a heterogeneous group of compounds with markedly different chemical structures, a spectrum of antihistaminic properties, adverse effects, half-life, tissue distribution, metabolism and varying degrees of anti-inflammatory effects. Histamine is an important mast cell- and basophil-derived mediator that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma, resulting in smooth muscle contraction, mucus hypersecretion, and increased vascular permeability leading to mucosal edema. Antihistamines should never be used as monotherapy for asthma but there is evidence that these drugs give a measure of protection in histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that the use of second-generation antihistamines, as adjunct therapy, may benefit those patients whose allergic asthma co-exists with allergic rhinitis. Indeed, many patients present with both allergic rhinitis and asthma. The link between the upper and lower respiratory airways is now well established and there is increasing evidence that allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for the development of asthma. More recently, a number of novel antihistamines have been developed which are either metabolites of active drugs or enantiomers and there is emerging evidence that at least one of these drugs, desloratadine, may give significant symptomatic benefit in some types of asthma. It is of interest to note that cetirizine provides a primary pharmacological intervention strategy to prevent the development of asthma in specifically-sensitized high risk groups of infants. Moreover, the documented anti-inflammatory activities of antihistamines may provide a novel mechanism of action for the therapeutic control of virus-induced asthma exacerbations by inhibiting the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) by airway epithelial cells. Finally, several well-conducted studies suggest that combination therapy with antihistamines and antileukotrienes may be as effective as corticosteroid use in patients with allergic asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis.
{"title":"Second-generation antihistamines in asthma therapy: is there a protective effect?","authors":"Garry M Walsh","doi":"10.1007/BF03257160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonists are recognized as being highly effective treatments for allergic-based disease and are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in the world. The newer antihistamines represent a heterogeneous group of compounds with markedly different chemical structures, a spectrum of antihistaminic properties, adverse effects, half-life, tissue distribution, metabolism and varying degrees of anti-inflammatory effects. Histamine is an important mast cell- and basophil-derived mediator that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma, resulting in smooth muscle contraction, mucus hypersecretion, and increased vascular permeability leading to mucosal edema. Antihistamines should never be used as monotherapy for asthma but there is evidence that these drugs give a measure of protection in histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that the use of second-generation antihistamines, as adjunct therapy, may benefit those patients whose allergic asthma co-exists with allergic rhinitis. Indeed, many patients present with both allergic rhinitis and asthma. The link between the upper and lower respiratory airways is now well established and there is increasing evidence that allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for the development of asthma. More recently, a number of novel antihistamines have been developed which are either metabolites of active drugs or enantiomers and there is emerging evidence that at least one of these drugs, desloratadine, may give significant symptomatic benefit in some types of asthma. It is of interest to note that cetirizine provides a primary pharmacological intervention strategy to prevent the development of asthma in specifically-sensitized high risk groups of infants. Moreover, the documented anti-inflammatory activities of antihistamines may provide a novel mechanism of action for the therapeutic control of virus-induced asthma exacerbations by inhibiting the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) by airway epithelial cells. Finally, several well-conducted studies suggest that combination therapy with antihistamines and antileukotrienes may be as effective as corticosteroid use in patients with allergic asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03257160","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24162738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung transplantation has emerged as an option to prolong and increase the quality of life in patients with end-stage pulmonary lung disease. In lung transplant recipients, because of the high potential for acute and chronic allograft rejection, optimal selection, dosage and delivery of immunosuppressive medications is critical. Cystic fibrosis (CF), a multi-organ system disease that often includes pulmonary and gastrointestinal manifestations, represents the leading indication for bilateral lung transplantation. The gastrointestinal manifestations of CF, however, confound post-transplant management by causing significant variation in the rate and extent of absorption of orally administered immunosuppressive medications. Tacrolimus, a new calcineurin inhibitor, is increasingly employed as the primary immunosuppressive agent in lung transplant recipients. Unfortunately, tacrolimus itself exhibits variable bioavailability, particularly in CF transplant recipients. A novel approach to the absorption dilemma is administration of tacrolimus via the sublingual (SL) route. Little published information exists concerning the use of SL immunosuppression in transplant recipients. However, emerging evidence suggests that SL tacrolimus provides is an effective means of drug delivery particularly for CF lung transplant recipients. Preliminary results from a pilot study, demonstrate that SL delivery of tacrolimus achieves therapeutic serum levels, in lung transplant recipients with CF, over the first few postoperative months. In addition, the early postoperative use of SL tacrolimus has been associated with acceptable rates of transplant rejection and normal renal function in a cohort of 22 lung transplant recipients that included CF and non-CF transplant recipients. Potential pharmacokinetic advantages of the SL route of delivery include good permeability, rapid absorption, acceptable bioavailability and easy accessibility. From an economic standpoint, considerable cost savings could be achieved by using the SL rather than the intravenous route of drug delivery for tacrolimus. Comparative, prospective randomized trials are necessary to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of SL tacrolimus in lung transplant patients. Until such data are available, the use of SL tacrolimus should be considered in situations where alternative routes of delivery are unavailable or as part of ongoing research studies. Ultimately, SL tacrolimus may prove efficacious for short-term use in the early postoperative lung transplant recipients, particularly in patients with malabsorption problems such as CF transplant recipients.
{"title":"Sublingual tacrolimus for immunosuppression in lung transplantation: a potentially important therapeutic option in cystic fibrosis.","authors":"B Diane Reams, Scott M Palmer","doi":"10.1007/BF03256598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung transplantation has emerged as an option to prolong and increase the quality of life in patients with end-stage pulmonary lung disease. In lung transplant recipients, because of the high potential for acute and chronic allograft rejection, optimal selection, dosage and delivery of immunosuppressive medications is critical. Cystic fibrosis (CF), a multi-organ system disease that often includes pulmonary and gastrointestinal manifestations, represents the leading indication for bilateral lung transplantation. The gastrointestinal manifestations of CF, however, confound post-transplant management by causing significant variation in the rate and extent of absorption of orally administered immunosuppressive medications. Tacrolimus, a new calcineurin inhibitor, is increasingly employed as the primary immunosuppressive agent in lung transplant recipients. Unfortunately, tacrolimus itself exhibits variable bioavailability, particularly in CF transplant recipients. A novel approach to the absorption dilemma is administration of tacrolimus via the sublingual (SL) route. Little published information exists concerning the use of SL immunosuppression in transplant recipients. However, emerging evidence suggests that SL tacrolimus provides is an effective means of drug delivery particularly for CF lung transplant recipients. Preliminary results from a pilot study, demonstrate that SL delivery of tacrolimus achieves therapeutic serum levels, in lung transplant recipients with CF, over the first few postoperative months. In addition, the early postoperative use of SL tacrolimus has been associated with acceptable rates of transplant rejection and normal renal function in a cohort of 22 lung transplant recipients that included CF and non-CF transplant recipients. Potential pharmacokinetic advantages of the SL route of delivery include good permeability, rapid absorption, acceptable bioavailability and easy accessibility. From an economic standpoint, considerable cost savings could be achieved by using the SL rather than the intravenous route of drug delivery for tacrolimus. Comparative, prospective randomized trials are necessary to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of SL tacrolimus in lung transplant patients. Until such data are available, the use of SL tacrolimus should be considered in situations where alternative routes of delivery are unavailable or as part of ongoing research studies. Ultimately, SL tacrolimus may prove efficacious for short-term use in the early postoperative lung transplant recipients, particularly in patients with malabsorption problems such as CF transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 2","pages":"91-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256598","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24164004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with advanced emphysema. In some patients with emphysema who are candidates for lung transplantation, LVRS is an alternative treatment option to lung transplantation, or may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Generally accepted criteria for LVRS include severe non-reversible airflow obstruction due to emphysema associated with significant evidence of lung hyperinflation and air trapping. Both high resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and quantitative ventilation/perfusion scan are used to identify lung regions with severe emphysema which would be used as targets for lung resection. Bilateral LVRS is the preferred surgical approach compared with the unilateral procedure because of better functional outcome. Lung transplantation is the preferred surgical treatment in patients with emphysema with alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency and in patients with very severe disease who have homogeneous emphysema pattern on CT scan of the chest or very low diffusion capacity.
{"title":"Lung volume reduction surgery as a bridge to lung transplantation.","authors":"Francis C Cordova, Gerard J Criner","doi":"10.1007/BF03256625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256625","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with advanced emphysema. In some patients with emphysema who are candidates for lung transplantation, LVRS is an alternative treatment option to lung transplantation, or may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Generally accepted criteria for LVRS include severe non-reversible airflow obstruction due to emphysema associated with significant evidence of lung hyperinflation and air trapping. Both high resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and quantitative ventilation/perfusion scan are used to identify lung regions with severe emphysema which would be used as targets for lung resection. Bilateral LVRS is the preferred surgical approach compared with the unilateral procedure because of better functional outcome. Lung transplantation is the preferred surgical treatment in patients with emphysema with alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency and in patients with very severe disease who have homogeneous emphysema pattern on CT scan of the chest or very low diffusion capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 5","pages":"313-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256625","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The face of bronchiectasis may have changed in recent years but individual cases continue to pose difficult challenges. As childhood infection becomes less of a problem, alternative causes of bronchiectasis are increasingly recognized which themselves offer new problems of diagnosis and management. Evolving concepts of pathogenesis suggest alternative strategies for treatment but as yet the evidence base on which to make firm decisions is lacking. Antibacterial regimens are not universally applicable and individualized protocols with parenteral, nebulized or continuous antibacterial therapy are increasingly used in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite the theoretical appeal of using mucolytic or anti-inflammatory drugs their roles are still uncertain and have yet to be examined in adequate clinical trials. The factors determining disease progression are still poorly understood but in some patients worsening airflow obstruction heralds the onset of ventilatory failure. The management of the latter requires bronchodilators and controlled oxygen therapy, and strategies including non-invasive ventilation are increasingly an option. Changing indications for surgery are evident with fewer palliative resections but a developing role for transplantation.
{"title":"Changing paradigms in the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis.","authors":"Michael Greenstone","doi":"10.1007/BF03256627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The face of bronchiectasis may have changed in recent years but individual cases continue to pose difficult challenges. As childhood infection becomes less of a problem, alternative causes of bronchiectasis are increasingly recognized which themselves offer new problems of diagnosis and management. Evolving concepts of pathogenesis suggest alternative strategies for treatment but as yet the evidence base on which to make firm decisions is lacking. Antibacterial regimens are not universally applicable and individualized protocols with parenteral, nebulized or continuous antibacterial therapy are increasingly used in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite the theoretical appeal of using mucolytic or anti-inflammatory drugs their roles are still uncertain and have yet to be examined in adequate clinical trials. The factors determining disease progression are still poorly understood but in some patients worsening airflow obstruction heralds the onset of ventilatory failure. The management of the latter requires bronchodilators and controlled oxygen therapy, and strategies including non-invasive ventilation are increasingly an option. Changing indications for surgery are evident with fewer palliative resections but a developing role for transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 5","pages":"339-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256627","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common lethal genetic disorder that affects all ethnic populations; however, it is most prevalent in Caucasians. Intensive basic research over the last 20 years has resulted in a wealth of information regarding the CF gene, its protein product and the mutational basis of disease. This increased understanding has lead to the development of gene therapy for the treatment of CF pulmonary disease. Delivery of the CF gene to the airway requires direct in vivo transfer using vectors encoding for normal CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein. Several vectors are currently available for CF gene transfer and include both viral (adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses) and non-viral (liposomal) systems. Initial clinical trials with each of these vectors have demonstrated that gene transfer to the CF airway is possible. The efficiency of transfer and duration of expression, however, have been limited. The effects of gene transfer on correction of the basic ion transport defects have also been highly variable and inconsistent, irrespective of the vector. Currently, the risk of severe immunological reactions is the primary factor limiting the clinical advancement of gene therapy. Both the adenoviral and liposomal vectors are associated with significant acute inflammatory reactions. The adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses also elicit humoral immune responses that significantly reduce the efficiency of transgene expression and increase the risk of readministration. Several strategies are under investigation to improve the efficiency of gene transfer to the CF airway. These include overcoming local barriers in the lung, circumventing the immune response and improving vector internalization and/or uptake. Application of gene transfer in the child and possibly the fetus are also potential future clinical applications of gene therapy. However, despite considerable research with gene therapy, there is little evidence to suggest that a well tolerated and effective gene transfer method is imminent and aggressive use of conventional pharmacological therapies currently offer the greatest promise in the treatment of patients with CF.
{"title":"Current status of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis pulmonary disease.","authors":"Mary Jayne Kennedy","doi":"10.1007/BF03256628","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common lethal genetic disorder that affects all ethnic populations; however, it is most prevalent in Caucasians. Intensive basic research over the last 20 years has resulted in a wealth of information regarding the CF gene, its protein product and the mutational basis of disease. This increased understanding has lead to the development of gene therapy for the treatment of CF pulmonary disease. Delivery of the CF gene to the airway requires direct in vivo transfer using vectors encoding for normal CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein. Several vectors are currently available for CF gene transfer and include both viral (adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses) and non-viral (liposomal) systems. Initial clinical trials with each of these vectors have demonstrated that gene transfer to the CF airway is possible. The efficiency of transfer and duration of expression, however, have been limited. The effects of gene transfer on correction of the basic ion transport defects have also been highly variable and inconsistent, irrespective of the vector. Currently, the risk of severe immunological reactions is the primary factor limiting the clinical advancement of gene therapy. Both the adenoviral and liposomal vectors are associated with significant acute inflammatory reactions. The adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses also elicit humoral immune responses that significantly reduce the efficiency of transgene expression and increase the risk of readministration. Several strategies are under investigation to improve the efficiency of gene transfer to the CF airway. These include overcoming local barriers in the lung, circumventing the immune response and improving vector internalization and/or uptake. Application of gene transfer in the child and possibly the fetus are also potential future clinical applications of gene therapy. However, despite considerable research with gene therapy, there is little evidence to suggest that a well tolerated and effective gene transfer method is imminent and aggressive use of conventional pharmacological therapies currently offer the greatest promise in the treatment of patients with CF.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 5","pages":"349-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256628","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24161811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christophe Van de Wiele, Alberto Signore, Rudi Andre Dierckx
Radiolabeled cell-surface peptide receptor-binding molecules are emerging as an important class of radiopharmaceuticals. Their binding to specific cell membrane receptors allows for noninvasive assessment of regional receptor proteomics in vivo. Information thus obtained can be used for diagnostic purposes and for predicting and monitoring response to treatment. This paradigm also applies to pulmonary diseases. In this review, available radiopharmaceuticals of great potential or already in clinical use for imaging of lung cancer, lung inflammation and infection and pulmonary embolism are discussed. In lung cancer, somatostatin receptor imaging by means of technetium-99m (99mTc)-octreotide scintigraphy has proven useful for characterizing malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Additionally, several radiopharmaceuticals targeting tyrosine-kinase, e.g. 99mTc labeled epidermal growth factor and indium-111 (111In)-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid-trastuzumab, or G-protein coupled receptors, e.g. 99mTc-bombesin, iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide and 111In-tetraazacyclododecane tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-cholecystokinine-B, are being explored for their diagnostic as well as treatment monitoring potential. With the purpose of better evaluating the source of pulmonary embolism, as well as to differentiate acute from chronic deep venous thrombosis, several radiolabeled peptides targeting the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa fibrinogen receptor found on activated platelets have been developed. Out of these, 99mTc-P280 is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for scintigraphic imaging of suspected acute venous thrombosis in the lower extremities of patients. In the field of lung inflammation and infection, non-specific 111In and 99mTc-human polyclonal immunoglobulins have been successfully used to identify the presence and extent of Pneumocystis carinii, cytomegalovirus, Mycobaterium avium and fungal infections in patients with HIV infection. The clinical role of other radiopharmaceuticals such as 99mTc-J001X, a nonpyrogenic acylated polygalactoside isolated from Klebsiella pneumoniae and binding with high affinity to CD11b and CD14 lipopolysaccharide receptors expressed on monocytes/macrophages, and 111In-octreotide, binding to up-regulated somatostatin receptors on activated lymphocytes needs to be further defined.
{"title":"Peptide receptor imaging: advances in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases.","authors":"Christophe Van de Wiele, Alberto Signore, Rudi Andre Dierckx","doi":"10.1007/BF03256607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiolabeled cell-surface peptide receptor-binding molecules are emerging as an important class of radiopharmaceuticals. Their binding to specific cell membrane receptors allows for noninvasive assessment of regional receptor proteomics in vivo. Information thus obtained can be used for diagnostic purposes and for predicting and monitoring response to treatment. This paradigm also applies to pulmonary diseases. In this review, available radiopharmaceuticals of great potential or already in clinical use for imaging of lung cancer, lung inflammation and infection and pulmonary embolism are discussed. In lung cancer, somatostatin receptor imaging by means of technetium-99m (99mTc)-octreotide scintigraphy has proven useful for characterizing malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Additionally, several radiopharmaceuticals targeting tyrosine-kinase, e.g. 99mTc labeled epidermal growth factor and indium-111 (111In)-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid-trastuzumab, or G-protein coupled receptors, e.g. 99mTc-bombesin, iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide and 111In-tetraazacyclododecane tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-cholecystokinine-B, are being explored for their diagnostic as well as treatment monitoring potential. With the purpose of better evaluating the source of pulmonary embolism, as well as to differentiate acute from chronic deep venous thrombosis, several radiolabeled peptides targeting the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa fibrinogen receptor found on activated platelets have been developed. Out of these, 99mTc-P280 is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for scintigraphic imaging of suspected acute venous thrombosis in the lower extremities of patients. In the field of lung inflammation and infection, non-specific 111In and 99mTc-human polyclonal immunoglobulins have been successfully used to identify the presence and extent of Pneumocystis carinii, cytomegalovirus, Mycobaterium avium and fungal infections in patients with HIV infection. The clinical role of other radiopharmaceuticals such as 99mTc-J001X, a nonpyrogenic acylated polygalactoside isolated from Klebsiella pneumoniae and binding with high affinity to CD11b and CD14 lipopolysaccharide receptors expressed on monocytes/macrophages, and 111In-octreotide, binding to up-regulated somatostatin receptors on activated lymphocytes needs to be further defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 3","pages":"177-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256607","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24162296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Influenza virus infection accounts for significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures among persons worldwide. Approximately 20,000 to 40,000 people in the US die each year as a result of influenza. Individuals most susceptible to adverse outcomes include the elderly and those with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, renal failure, malignancy, or immunosuppression. Prior to the AIDS epidemic, underlying respiratory disease was the greatest risk factor for influenza-related hospitalization ranking third to heart disease and malignancy for risk of mortality. Although the influenza vaccine can help prevent pneumonia and hospitalization, it is limited by less than ideal immunization rates and the possibility of viral antigenic shifts that render the vaccine ineffective. Pharmacologic interventions play an important role in the management of influenza virus infection by shortening the duration of symptoms. The advent of the neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) zanamivir and oseltamivir has significantly affected the treatment of influenza. Unlike NAIs, the older therapeutic options amantadine and rimantadine may cause significant central nervous system adverse effects. In addition, amantadine and rimantadine are not active against influenza B viruses, whereas NAIs are active against both influenza A and B. Post-marketing surveillance of the NAIs has revealed that bronchospasm may occur in patients with underlying respiratory disease treated with the NAI zanamivir. Recent data suggest zanamivir is effective in patients with underlying respiratory disease, but the data are insufficient to elucidate the true risk of bronchospasm. Based on post-marketing reports, zanamivir should be used with caution in patients with asthma or COPD. Although oseltamivir has not been associated with any significant respiratory adverse effects, no data exist on the safety and efficacy of this NAI in patients with underlying respiratory disease.
{"title":"Neuraminidase inhibitors in patients with underlying airways disease.","authors":"John C Williamson, P Samuel Pegram","doi":"10.1007/BF03256597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Influenza virus infection accounts for significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures among persons worldwide. Approximately 20,000 to 40,000 people in the US die each year as a result of influenza. Individuals most susceptible to adverse outcomes include the elderly and those with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, renal failure, malignancy, or immunosuppression. Prior to the AIDS epidemic, underlying respiratory disease was the greatest risk factor for influenza-related hospitalization ranking third to heart disease and malignancy for risk of mortality. Although the influenza vaccine can help prevent pneumonia and hospitalization, it is limited by less than ideal immunization rates and the possibility of viral antigenic shifts that render the vaccine ineffective. Pharmacologic interventions play an important role in the management of influenza virus infection by shortening the duration of symptoms. The advent of the neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) zanamivir and oseltamivir has significantly affected the treatment of influenza. Unlike NAIs, the older therapeutic options amantadine and rimantadine may cause significant central nervous system adverse effects. In addition, amantadine and rimantadine are not active against influenza B viruses, whereas NAIs are active against both influenza A and B. Post-marketing surveillance of the NAIs has revealed that bronchospasm may occur in patients with underlying respiratory disease treated with the NAI zanamivir. Recent data suggest zanamivir is effective in patients with underlying respiratory disease, but the data are insufficient to elucidate the true risk of bronchospasm. Based on post-marketing reports, zanamivir should be used with caution in patients with asthma or COPD. Although oseltamivir has not been associated with any significant respiratory adverse effects, no data exist on the safety and efficacy of this NAI in patients with underlying respiratory disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 2","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256597","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24164003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious complication resulting from the migration of emboli to the lungs. Although deep venous thrombi are the most common source of emboli to the lungs, other important sources include air, amniotic fluid, fat and bone marrow. Regardless of the specific source of the emboli, very little progress has been made in the pharmacological management of this high mortality condition. Because the prognosis is linked to the degree of elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance, any therapeutic intervention to improve the hemodynamics would probably increase the low survival rate of this critical condition. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been widely tested and used in cases of pulmonary hypertension of different causes. In the last few years some authors have described beneficial effects of iNO in animal models of acute PE and in anecdotal cases of massive PE. The primary cause of death in massive PE that is caused by deep venous thrombi, gas or amniotic fluid, is acute right heart failure and circulatory shock. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance following acute PE is the cumulative result of mechanical obstruction of pulmonary vessels and pulmonary arteriolar constriction (attributable to a neurogenic reflex and to the release of vasoconstrictors). As such, the vasodilator effects of iNO could actively oppose the pulmonary hypertension following PE. This hypothesis is consistently supported by experimental studies in different animal models of PE, which demonstrated that iNO decreased (by 10 to 20%) the pulmonary artery pressure without improving pulmonary gas exchange. Although maximal vasodilatory effects are probably achieved by less than 5 parts per million iNO, which is a relatively low concentration, no dose-response study has been published so far. In addition to the animal studies, a few anecdotal reports in the literature suggest that iNO may improve the hemodynamics during acute PE. However, no prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial addressing this issue has been conducted to date. Future investigations addressing the effects of iNO combined with other drugs such as vasoconstrictors and inhibitors of phosphodiesterase III or V, may increase the responsiveness to iNO in acute PE.
{"title":"Is there a place for inhaled nitric oxide in the therapy of acute pulmonary embolism?","authors":"Jose E Tanus-Santos, Michael J Theodorakis","doi":"10.1007/BF03256606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious complication resulting from the migration of emboli to the lungs. Although deep venous thrombi are the most common source of emboli to the lungs, other important sources include air, amniotic fluid, fat and bone marrow. Regardless of the specific source of the emboli, very little progress has been made in the pharmacological management of this high mortality condition. Because the prognosis is linked to the degree of elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance, any therapeutic intervention to improve the hemodynamics would probably increase the low survival rate of this critical condition. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been widely tested and used in cases of pulmonary hypertension of different causes. In the last few years some authors have described beneficial effects of iNO in animal models of acute PE and in anecdotal cases of massive PE. The primary cause of death in massive PE that is caused by deep venous thrombi, gas or amniotic fluid, is acute right heart failure and circulatory shock. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance following acute PE is the cumulative result of mechanical obstruction of pulmonary vessels and pulmonary arteriolar constriction (attributable to a neurogenic reflex and to the release of vasoconstrictors). As such, the vasodilator effects of iNO could actively oppose the pulmonary hypertension following PE. This hypothesis is consistently supported by experimental studies in different animal models of PE, which demonstrated that iNO decreased (by 10 to 20%) the pulmonary artery pressure without improving pulmonary gas exchange. Although maximal vasodilatory effects are probably achieved by less than 5 parts per million iNO, which is a relatively low concentration, no dose-response study has been published so far. In addition to the animal studies, a few anecdotal reports in the literature suggest that iNO may improve the hemodynamics during acute PE. However, no prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial addressing this issue has been conducted to date. Future investigations addressing the effects of iNO combined with other drugs such as vasoconstrictors and inhibitors of phosphodiesterase III or V, may increase the responsiveness to iNO in acute PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 3","pages":"167-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256606","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24162295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients with allergic rhinitis frequently present with symptoms of nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, daytime somnolence and fatigue associated with decreased cognitive performance and impaired quality of life. Recent research has suggested that daytime somnolence in allergic rhinitis can be attributed to chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa leading to nasal congestion and obstructed nasal passageways resulting in disturbed sleep. Treating daytime somnolence due to allergic rhinitis requires a reduction in obstruction caused by nasal congestion. Currently available therapy for allergic rhinitis includes topical corticosteroids, sedating and nonsedating antihistamines, topical cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), decongestants, immunotherapy and topical ipratropium bromide. The effectiveness of antihistamines in patients with allergic rhinitis has long been established. However, results of placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of azelastine on sleep and daytime somnolence have produced conflicting results. Sleep improved with azelastine therapy, but there was a lack of evidence that azelastine significantly affected daytime sleepiness, sleep severity and nasal congestion. Sedating antihistamines exacerbate daytime somnolence and should be avoided in patients with allergic rhinitis. In a separate study, desloratadine failed to benefit sleep, but did not worsen daytime somnolence. Topical nasal cromolyn sodium is inconvenient to use and is unlikely to have a major effect on nasal congestion. Decongestants do decrease nasal congestion but the effect this has on sleep has not been adequately studied. Recent research has shown that topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment for alleviating nasal congestion secondary to allergic rhinitis. However, few studies have assessed the effect of topical corticosteroids on daytime fatigue and sleep. In 20 patients with allergic rhinitis and symptoms of daytime sleepiness, flunisolide significantly improved sleep quality and congestion but daytime sleepiness was not significantly improved. A similar study with fluticasone propionate showed improvement in nasal congestion and sleep but there was no significant change in objective sleep measurements recorded on polysomnography. Further research involving objective measures of sleep quality is necessary to determine the efficacy of medications in the treatment of allergic rhinitis associated with fatigue and daytime somnolence.
{"title":"Poor sleep and daytime somnolence in allergic rhinitis: significance of nasal congestion.","authors":"Sujani Kakumanu, Casey Glass, Timothy Craig","doi":"10.1007/BF03256609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256609","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with allergic rhinitis frequently present with symptoms of nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, daytime somnolence and fatigue associated with decreased cognitive performance and impaired quality of life. Recent research has suggested that daytime somnolence in allergic rhinitis can be attributed to chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa leading to nasal congestion and obstructed nasal passageways resulting in disturbed sleep. Treating daytime somnolence due to allergic rhinitis requires a reduction in obstruction caused by nasal congestion. Currently available therapy for allergic rhinitis includes topical corticosteroids, sedating and nonsedating antihistamines, topical cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), decongestants, immunotherapy and topical ipratropium bromide. The effectiveness of antihistamines in patients with allergic rhinitis has long been established. However, results of placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of azelastine on sleep and daytime somnolence have produced conflicting results. Sleep improved with azelastine therapy, but there was a lack of evidence that azelastine significantly affected daytime sleepiness, sleep severity and nasal congestion. Sedating antihistamines exacerbate daytime somnolence and should be avoided in patients with allergic rhinitis. In a separate study, desloratadine failed to benefit sleep, but did not worsen daytime somnolence. Topical nasal cromolyn sodium is inconvenient to use and is unlikely to have a major effect on nasal congestion. Decongestants do decrease nasal congestion but the effect this has on sleep has not been adequately studied. Recent research has shown that topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment for alleviating nasal congestion secondary to allergic rhinitis. However, few studies have assessed the effect of topical corticosteroids on daytime fatigue and sleep. In 20 patients with allergic rhinitis and symptoms of daytime sleepiness, flunisolide significantly improved sleep quality and congestion but daytime sleepiness was not significantly improved. A similar study with fluticasone propionate showed improvement in nasal congestion and sleep but there was no significant change in objective sleep measurements recorded on polysomnography. Further research involving objective measures of sleep quality is necessary to determine the efficacy of medications in the treatment of allergic rhinitis associated with fatigue and daytime somnolence.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 3","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256609","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24163999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Opinion and Evidence in Respiratory Medicine","authors":"Adis Editorial","doi":"10.1007/BF03257164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257164","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03257164","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52245653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}