首页 > 最新文献

King's law journal : KLJ最新文献

英文 中文
The Potential for International Regulation of Gig Economy Issues 零工经济问题的国际监管潜力
Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1789442
Tonia Novitz
The rapidly increasing hire of labour through platforms or ‘apps’ has attracted considerable attention. Most current debates focus on whether those engaged in ‘gig economy’ work can be characterise...
通过平台或“应用程序”迅速增加的劳动力招聘引起了相当大的关注。目前的大多数争论都集中在那些从事“零工经济”工作的人是否可以被描述成……
{"title":"The Potential for International Regulation of Gig Economy Issues","authors":"Tonia Novitz","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1789442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1789442","url":null,"abstract":"The rapidly increasing hire of labour through platforms or ‘apps’ has attracted considerable attention. Most current debates focus on whether those engaged in ‘gig economy’ work can be characterise...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"52 1","pages":"275 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79542517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
When the Corporate Veil is Lifted: Synergies of Public Labour Institutions and Platform Workers 当企业面纱被揭开:公共劳动机构和平台工人的协同效应
Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1784077
J. López, Alexandre de le Court
‘My boss is not an algorithm’. With that slogan, platform workers have denounced the invisibility of the employer in some production systems in the gig economy. The issue posed by that invisibility...
“我的老板不是一个算法”。在这一口号下,平台工人谴责了在零工经济的一些生产系统中雇主的隐形性。隐形带来的问题……
{"title":"When the Corporate Veil is Lifted: Synergies of Public Labour Institutions and Platform Workers","authors":"J. López, Alexandre de le Court","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1784077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1784077","url":null,"abstract":"‘My boss is not an algorithm’. With that slogan, platform workers have denounced the invisibility of the employer in some production systems in the gig economy. The issue posed by that invisibility...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"26 1","pages":"324 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87951016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Wages and Working Time in the ‘Gig Economy’ “零工经济”中的工资和工作时间
Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1790820
Angela C. Davies
Since the gig economy began to form part of the public consciousness, many labour lawyers have been preoccupied with one central question: are people working in the gig economy employees, or more l...
自从零工经济开始成为公众意识的一部分以来,许多劳工律师一直专注于一个核心问题:在零工经济中工作的人是雇员,还是更多人?
{"title":"Wages and Working Time in the ‘Gig Economy’","authors":"Angela C. Davies","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1790820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1790820","url":null,"abstract":"Since the gig economy began to form part of the public consciousness, many labour lawyers have been preoccupied with one central question: are people working in the gig economy employees, or more l...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"14 1","pages":"250 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75214362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Between Sein and Sollen of Labour Law: Civil (and Constitutional) Law Perspectives on Platform Workers 在劳工法的Sein和Sollen之间:平台工人的民事(和宪法)法律视角
Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1789443
Vincenzo Pietrogiovanni
The production structure that companies of the so-called ‘platform capitalism’ adopt is based—in very essential terms—on the idea of resorting to the collaboration of an indefinite quantity of work...
所谓的“平台资本主义”公司所采用的生产结构——从本质上讲——是基于一种理念,即求助于无限量的工作的合作……
{"title":"Between Sein and Sollen of Labour Law: Civil (and Constitutional) Law Perspectives on Platform Workers","authors":"Vincenzo Pietrogiovanni","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1789443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1789443","url":null,"abstract":"The production structure that companies of the so-called ‘platform capitalism’ adopt is based—in very essential terms—on the idea of resorting to the collaboration of an indefinite quantity of work...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"71 1","pages":"313 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75670605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Playing Catch-Up but Falling Short: Regulating Work in the Gig Economy in Australia 追赶但不达标:监管澳大利亚零工经济中的工作
Pub Date : 2020-04-28 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1789433
A. Forsyth
There has been quite rapid growth in the size of the gig or platform economy in Australia over the last five years. In 2016, it was estimated that around 0.5% of the workforce or just under 80,000 ...
在过去的五年里,澳大利亚的零工或平台经济的规模增长相当迅速。2016年,据估计,大约0.5%的劳动力或不到8万人……
{"title":"Playing Catch-Up but Falling Short: Regulating Work in the Gig Economy in Australia","authors":"A. Forsyth","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1789433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1789433","url":null,"abstract":"There has been quite rapid growth in the size of the gig or platform economy in Australia over the last five years. In 2016, it was estimated that around 0.5% of the workforce or just under 80,000 ...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"18 1","pages":"287 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85526646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Covid-19: Government by Decree Covid-19:政令政府
Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1759398
K. Ewing
On 24 September 2019, the United Kingdom Supreme Court held that an attempt by the then Conservative government to prorogue Parliament was unlawful.1 In doing so, the Court powerfully re-asserted t...
2019年9月24日,英国最高法院裁定,当时的保守党政府试图休会的企图是非法的在这样做时,法院有力地再次断言……
{"title":"Covid-19: Government by Decree","authors":"K. Ewing","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1759398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1759398","url":null,"abstract":"On 24 September 2019, the United Kingdom Supreme Court held that an attempt by the then Conservative government to prorogue Parliament was unlawful.1 In doing so, the Court powerfully re-asserted t...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74468632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Challenging (Again) the Undemocratic Form of the Common Law: Codification as a Method of Making the Law Accessible to Citizens 挑战(再一次)普通法的不民主形式:法典化作为一种使法律为公民所用的方法
Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1741150
Eva Steiner
The subject of codification of the so-called unwritten or common law is a subject of extreme importance, not only to the lawyer but to the layman. The science of jurisprudence is of interest only t...
所谓不成文法或普通法的编纂问题,不仅对律师,而且对外行来说,都是一个极其重要的问题。法学只有在……
{"title":"Challenging (Again) the Undemocratic Form of the Common Law: Codification as a Method of Making the Law Accessible to Citizens","authors":"Eva Steiner","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1741150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1741150","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of codification of the so-called unwritten or common law is a subject of extreme importance, not only to the lawyer but to the layman. The science of jurisprudence is of interest only t...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"64 1","pages":"27 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79243906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Declaratory Fiction 宣言式小说
Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1741160
Liron Shmilovits
The Greek philosopher Parmenides believed that nothing ever changed. The appearance of change, he claimed, was an illusion. His disciple, Zeno, invented a famous paradox— wherein Achilles could not outrun a tortoise —to prove that motion and change were impossible. It is said that Diogenes the Cynic responded by standing up and walking about. Unsurprisingly, the no-change theory never gained a wide following. But it was not until the development of calculus, in the seventeenth century, that the flaw in Zeno’s paradox was understood. Achilles finally won the race. And yet, Parmenides is not completely without followers these days. It is ‘trite law’, to use a trite expression, that judicial decisions have retroactive effect. By the magic of the declaratory theory, a judicial decision embodies the law as it has always been, notwithstanding previous decisions to the contrary. No change is possible. For no judge has the ability to change the law—only to declare what it has been from time immemorial. Achilles cannot outrun the tortoise. This is the paradox of the common law. On the one hand, judges abjure the declaratory theory, asserting the right to change the law. On the other hand, they say that their latest pronouncement is the law unchanged. Take Lord Hoffmann’s word for it: ‘To say that [judges] never change the law is a fiction... But... a judicial decision changes the law retrospectively... ’ The law changes, but it has always been the same. As the French say: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. The more things change, the more
希腊哲学家巴门尼德相信一切都不会改变。他声称,变化的表象是一种幻觉。他的弟子芝诺发明了一个著名的悖论——阿喀琉斯跑不过乌龟——来证明运动和变化是不可能的。据说,犬儒派第欧根尼的反应是站起来四处走动。不出所料,不变理论从未获得广泛的追随。但直到17世纪微积分的发展,芝诺悖论的缺陷才被理解。阿喀琉斯最终赢得了比赛。然而,巴门尼德现在并非完全没有追随者。用一个老生常谈的说法来说,司法判决具有追溯效力,这是“陈腐的法律”。由于声明性理论的魔力,一项司法判决一如既往地体现了法律,尽管以前的判决与之相反。改变是不可能的。因为没有一个法官有能力改变法律——他只能宣布自古以来的法律。阿喀琉斯跑不过乌龟。这就是普通法的悖论。一方面,法官放弃声明说,主张修改法律的权利。另一方面,他们说他们的最新声明是法律不变。就拿霍夫曼勋爵的话来说:“说(法官)从不改变法律是一种虚构……但是…一项司法判决追溯地改变了法律。“法律会变,但一直都是一样的。正如法国人所说:加上改变,加上c 'est la même选择。事情变化得越多,就越多
{"title":"The Declaratory Fiction","authors":"Liron Shmilovits","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1741160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1741160","url":null,"abstract":"The Greek philosopher Parmenides believed that nothing ever changed. The appearance of change, he claimed, was an illusion. His disciple, Zeno, invented a famous paradox— wherein Achilles could not outrun a tortoise —to prove that motion and change were impossible. It is said that Diogenes the Cynic responded by standing up and walking about. Unsurprisingly, the no-change theory never gained a wide following. But it was not until the development of calculus, in the seventeenth century, that the flaw in Zeno’s paradox was understood. Achilles finally won the race. And yet, Parmenides is not completely without followers these days. It is ‘trite law’, to use a trite expression, that judicial decisions have retroactive effect. By the magic of the declaratory theory, a judicial decision embodies the law as it has always been, notwithstanding previous decisions to the contrary. No change is possible. For no judge has the ability to change the law—only to declare what it has been from time immemorial. Achilles cannot outrun the tortoise. This is the paradox of the common law. On the one hand, judges abjure the declaratory theory, asserting the right to change the law. On the other hand, they say that their latest pronouncement is the law unchanged. Take Lord Hoffmann’s word for it: ‘To say that [judges] never change the law is a fiction... But... a judicial decision changes the law retrospectively... ’ The law changes, but it has always been the same. As the French say: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. The more things change, the more","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"74 1","pages":"59 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85645205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Aberrant Tort of Lawful Means Conspiracy? 合法手段合谋的异常侵权行为?
Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1747790
Stephen Daly
The lawful means conspiracy tort provides an actionable claim where two (or more) parties combine to engage in a lawful activity, but do so with the predominant purpose of harming the claimant, and...
合谋侵权的合法手段提供了一种可诉的索赔,当两个(或更多)当事人联合从事合法活动,但这样做的主要目的是损害索赔人,并且……
{"title":"The Aberrant Tort of Lawful Means Conspiracy?","authors":"Stephen Daly","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1747790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1747790","url":null,"abstract":"The lawful means conspiracy tort provides an actionable claim where two (or more) parties combine to engage in a lawful activity, but do so with the predominant purpose of harming the claimant, and...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"51 1","pages":"145 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85672900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Judicial Role in a Democracy 试论司法在民主制度中的作用
Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09615768.2020.1771814
Alan L. Bogg, K. Ewing
This volume is dedicated to an examination of the judicial role in law –making, inspired in part by the current debate about the legitimacy of the judicial role. We begin what is a lively and eclectic collection of excellent papers with a piece by Eva Steiner which goes to the heart of the matter by examining how judicial law-making through the common law can be justified in a democracy, making a powerful case for better codification of the law in the civilian style. This is followed by Mike MacNair’s paper in which he contests the idea that the judicial role can be eliminated, but asks instead how it can be better contained. Engaging with a familiar debate on the Left about the judicial role, in a historically rich and vivid analysis, Mike Macnair argues ‘that the idea of wholly eliminating either trust in judges, or the use of judicial office for political purposes, is illusory. What is possible is to reduce trust in judges’. He then shows how this would be possible. This is followed in turn by Liron Shmilovits who reverts to analytical jurisprudence to address the late Barry Nicholas’ dilemma for the lawyer, that the law is ‘something which has its own life, which exists independently of [him or her] and is merely applied by [him or her], and yet [he or she] must on occasion in practice make law’. The solution in a sophisticated paper is to re-adopt the ‘declaratory theory’ of judicial decision-making as ‘a beneficial fiction that should be retained for reasons of principle, justice and pragmatism’. In the final three papers of the collection the focus tilts from the theoretical to a consideration of the judicial role in a number of different areas of law. Gillian Douglas and Stephen Gilmore explore the ‘legitimate bounds of the judicial development of family law in England and Wales’, and in particular ‘the legitimate scope of judicial power to offer general guideline judgments ‘controlling’ the exercise of discretion’. This is an important paper, which raises questions about the similar exercise of judicial power in other fields.
本卷是专门审查的司法角色在法律制定,部分灵感来自当前辩论的合法性的司法角色。我们从Eva Steiner的一篇文章开始这是一个生动而兼收并取的优秀论文合集这篇文章进入了问题的核心通过研究如何通过普通法制定司法法律在民主制度下是合理的,为更好地编纂民事风格的法律提出了强有力的理由。紧随其后的是Mike MacNair的论文,他在论文中对司法角色可以被取消的观点提出了质疑,而是提出了如何更好地控制司法角色的问题。麦克·麦克尼尔(Mike Macnair)参与了左派关于司法角色的熟悉辩论,他对历史进行了丰富而生动的分析,认为“完全消除对法官的信任或将司法职位用于政治目的的想法是虚幻的。”可能的是减少对法官的信任。然后他展示了这是如何可能的。随后,Liron Shmilovits又回到分析法学,为律师解决了已故的Barry Nicholas的困境,即法律是“有自己的生命的东西,它独立于[他或她]而存在,仅仅由[他或她]应用,然而[他或她]必须在实践中偶尔制定法律”。在一篇复杂的论文中,解决方案是重新采用司法决策的“声明理论”,将其作为“出于原则、正义和实用主义的原因而应保留的有益虚构”。在文集的最后三篇论文中,重点从理论转向对司法在许多不同法律领域中的作用的考虑。Gillian Douglas和Stephen Gilmore探讨了“英格兰和威尔士家庭法司法发展的合法界限”,特别是“提供一般指导性判决的司法权的合法范围”,以控制“自由裁量权的行使”。这是一篇重要的论文,它对其他领域类似的司法权行使提出了疑问。
{"title":"Exploring the Judicial Role in a Democracy","authors":"Alan L. Bogg, K. Ewing","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2020.1771814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1771814","url":null,"abstract":"This volume is dedicated to an examination of the judicial role in law –making, inspired in part by the current debate about the legitimacy of the judicial role. We begin what is a lively and eclectic collection of excellent papers with a piece by Eva Steiner which goes to the heart of the matter by examining how judicial law-making through the common law can be justified in a democracy, making a powerful case for better codification of the law in the civilian style. This is followed by Mike MacNair’s paper in which he contests the idea that the judicial role can be eliminated, but asks instead how it can be better contained. Engaging with a familiar debate on the Left about the judicial role, in a historically rich and vivid analysis, Mike Macnair argues ‘that the idea of wholly eliminating either trust in judges, or the use of judicial office for political purposes, is illusory. What is possible is to reduce trust in judges’. He then shows how this would be possible. This is followed in turn by Liron Shmilovits who reverts to analytical jurisprudence to address the late Barry Nicholas’ dilemma for the lawyer, that the law is ‘something which has its own life, which exists independently of [him or her] and is merely applied by [him or her], and yet [he or she] must on occasion in practice make law’. The solution in a sophisticated paper is to re-adopt the ‘declaratory theory’ of judicial decision-making as ‘a beneficial fiction that should be retained for reasons of principle, justice and pragmatism’. In the final three papers of the collection the focus tilts from the theoretical to a consideration of the judicial role in a number of different areas of law. Gillian Douglas and Stephen Gilmore explore the ‘legitimate bounds of the judicial development of family law in England and Wales’, and in particular ‘the legitimate scope of judicial power to offer general guideline judgments ‘controlling’ the exercise of discretion’. This is an important paper, which raises questions about the similar exercise of judicial power in other fields.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"12 1","pages":"25 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78807900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
King's law journal : KLJ
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1