Multiple studies have shown that testing contributes to learning at all educational levels. In this observational classroom study, we report the use of a learning tool developed for a Genetics and Molecular Biology course at the college level. An interactive set of practice exams that included 136 multiple choice questions (MCQ) or matching queries was developed in the open-source Moodle platform. All MCQ questions contained four answer choices and configured for immediate feedback upon answering. Feedback consisted of providing the right answer and a short explanation of the learning objective examined. The interactive material was tested and refined for several semesters. Usefulness of this tool was assessed in two distinct settings: (1) during a face-to-face semester (Fall 2019) by comparing the grades in a final departmental exam between students who used the tool and those who did not, and (2) during an online semester (Fall 2020) by analyzing the grades in the first and last attempts on study sessions and students' performance in monthly exams. We found that when solving practice tests, students obtained a significantly higher scores in the last attempt compared with their first attempt, and that students who used the material performed better than those who did not. In all cases, answering the practice exams was optional, but students made full use of them preferentially during the online semester. This classroom research exemplifies the documented effectiveness of practice tests enhanced with feedback in biological sciences education through an open-source learning platform.
{"title":"Use of practice tests with immediate feedback in an undergraduate molecular biology course","authors":"Javier Plasencia","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21695","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21695","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple studies have shown that testing contributes to learning at all educational levels. In this observational classroom study, we report the use of a learning tool developed for a Genetics and Molecular Biology course at the college level. An interactive set of practice exams that included 136 multiple choice questions (MCQ) or matching queries was developed in the open-source Moodle platform. All MCQ questions contained four answer choices and configured for immediate feedback upon answering. Feedback consisted of providing the right answer and a short explanation of the learning objective examined. The interactive material was tested and refined for several semesters. Usefulness of this tool was assessed in two distinct settings: (1) during a face-to-face semester (Fall 2019) by comparing the grades in a final departmental exam between students who used the tool and those who did not, and (2) during an online semester (Fall 2020) by analyzing the grades in the first and last attempts on study sessions and students' performance in monthly exams. We found that when solving practice tests, students obtained a significantly higher scores in the last attempt compared with their first attempt, and that students who used the material performed better than those who did not. In all cases, answering the practice exams was optional, but students made full use of them preferentially during the online semester. This classroom research exemplifies the documented effectiveness of practice tests enhanced with feedback in biological sciences education through an open-source learning platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/a6/BMB-51-65.PMC10100347.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9303013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal clubs are well regarded as a highly effective means of engaging graduate students with the contemporary research literature, where individual students prepare and deliver presentations on selected research articles to their peers, followed by a group discussion. Regular journal clubs have the advantage of enhancing student scientific reading, assessment and communication skills as well as developing a better understanding of the field. We developed a flipped journal club program as part of the one semester module ‘Genomics Research Methods’ with the goal of enhancing—and quantifying—individual student ability to engage with the genomics scientific literature. This involves all students and faculty reviewing a given manuscript, with the former submitting research relevant questions they would wish to ask the presenting student at the journal club, and the latter grading them. These questions are then ranked based on their median grade, and subsequently discussed in class. This cycle repeats weekly until all students have presented. Our analysis of question grade data over three consecutive years demonstrated clear improvements in student performance for all students between the start and end of the module. While no difference in performance was noted based on gender over the full semester, improvement in performance was significantly evident for the female cohort between the start and end of the module. Our results are consistent with module survey feedback of overall reported enhanced research self-efficacy. This demonstrates that this flipped journal club implementation is a highly effective means of both assessing and improving individual student learning in genomics research ability. The involvement of the teaching faculty furthermore offers a means to foster a dynamic research community for all participants involved. This methodology is easily transferable to other bioscience graduate/undergraduate programs seeking to effectively teach essential research ability skills and enhance student self-efficacy.
{"title":"Teaching graduate research skills in genomics via an integrated ‘flipped’ journal club program","authors":"Aaron Golden","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21694","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21694","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Journal clubs are well regarded as a highly effective means of engaging graduate students with the contemporary research literature, where individual students prepare and deliver presentations on selected research articles to their peers, followed by a group discussion. Regular journal clubs have the advantage of enhancing student scientific reading, assessment and communication skills as well as developing a better understanding of the field. We developed a flipped journal club program as part of the one semester module ‘Genomics Research Methods’ with the goal of enhancing—and quantifying—individual student ability to engage with the genomics scientific literature. This involves all students and faculty reviewing a given manuscript, with the former submitting research relevant questions they would wish to ask the presenting student at the journal club, and the latter grading them. These questions are then ranked based on their median grade, and subsequently discussed in class. This cycle repeats weekly until all students have presented. Our analysis of question grade data over three consecutive years demonstrated clear improvements in student performance for all students between the start and end of the module. While no difference in performance was noted based on gender over the full semester, improvement in performance was significantly evident for the female cohort between the start and end of the module. Our results are consistent with module survey feedback of overall reported enhanced research self-efficacy. This demonstrates that this flipped journal club implementation is a highly effective means of both assessing <i>and improving</i> individual student learning in genomics research ability. The involvement of the teaching faculty furthermore offers a means to foster a dynamic research community for all participants involved. This methodology is easily transferable to other bioscience graduate/undergraduate programs seeking to effectively teach essential research ability skills and enhance student self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/b7/BMB-51-57.PMC10098841.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9652587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The mission of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education (BAMBEd) is to “enhance [...] student learning in Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and related sciences.” And yet, our learning environments are far from equitable, with student outcomes that are highly segregated by resource allocation and opportunity. From global reckonings with gender inequality4–7 and racism8–13 to a pandemic that shined a spotlight on inequitable learning conditions, a 21st-first-century life sciences education requires reflection on whose needs are being met in our classrooms and whose contributions (and potential) are being unsupported and ignored. An equitable learning environment goes far beyond access to technology. Equitable teaching practices question the norms in our classrooms—from structure and content to context and the voices of authority represented by class materials. When these norms send the message to students that they do not belong, that they are not supported, that their contributions does not matter—then the learning environment is structurally designed for them to fail, regardless of the knowledge or talent they bring to our classrooms and laboratories. Given the inequities seen in molecular life sciences classrooms around the globe, we call for rapid communications (of no more than 1000 words) that address the unmet needs of the historically marginalized students in our classrooms. Submissions will be quickly reviewed, with accepted manuscripts fast-tracked for publication. Manuscripts accepted under this call will be included in a virtual special issue of BAMBEd that focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and access (DEIJA) in life sciences education. Submissions should center DEIJA within the scholarly work, going beyond the experiences of majority of students and instead identifying challenges, strategies, and opportunities for providing an equitable learning environment for all students, such as follows:
{"title":"Call for papers on diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and access (DEIJA) in molecular life sciences education","authors":"Daniel R. Dries, Rou-Jia Sung, Phillip A. Ortiz","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21687","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21687","url":null,"abstract":"The mission of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education (BAMBEd) is to “enhance [...] student learning in Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and related sciences.” And yet, our learning environments are far from equitable, with student outcomes that are highly segregated by resource allocation and opportunity. From global reckonings with gender inequality4–7 and racism8–13 to a pandemic that shined a spotlight on inequitable learning conditions, a 21st-first-century life sciences education requires reflection on whose needs are being met in our classrooms and whose contributions (and potential) are being unsupported and ignored. An equitable learning environment goes far beyond access to technology. Equitable teaching practices question the norms in our classrooms—from structure and content to context and the voices of authority represented by class materials. When these norms send the message to students that they do not belong, that they are not supported, that their contributions does not matter—then the learning environment is structurally designed for them to fail, regardless of the knowledge or talent they bring to our classrooms and laboratories. Given the inequities seen in molecular life sciences classrooms around the globe, we call for rapid communications (of no more than 1000 words) that address the unmet needs of the historically marginalized students in our classrooms. Submissions will be quickly reviewed, with accepted manuscripts fast-tracked for publication. Manuscripts accepted under this call will be included in a virtual special issue of BAMBEd that focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and access (DEIJA) in life sciences education. Submissions should center DEIJA within the scholarly work, going beyond the experiences of majority of students and instead identifying challenges, strategies, and opportunities for providing an equitable learning environment for all students, such as follows:","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"50 6","pages":"559-560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47451945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Phillip Gough, Oliver Bown, Craig R. Campbell, Philip Poronnik, Pauline M. Ross
Biomedical science students need to learn to code. Graduates face a future where they will be better prepared for research higher degrees and the workforce if they can code. Embedding coding in a biomedical curriculum comes with challenges. First, biomedical science students often experience anxiety learning quantitative and computational thinking skills and second biomedical faculty often lack expertise required to teach coding. In this study, we describe a creative coding approach to building coding skills in students using the packages of Processing and Arduino. Biomedical science students were taught by an interdisciplinary faculty team from Medicine and Health, Science and Architecture, Design and Planning. We describe quantitative and qualitative responses of students to this approach. Cluster analysis revealed a diversity of student responses, with a large majority of students who supported creative coding in the curriculum, a smaller but vocal cluster, who did not support creative coding because either the exercises were not sufficiently challenging or were too challenging and believed coding should not be in a Biomedical Science curriculum. We describe how two creative coding platforms, Processing and Arduino, embedded and used to visualize human physiological data, and provide responses to students, including those minority of students, who are opposed to coding in the curriculum This study found a variety of students responses in a final year capstone course of an undergraduate Biomedical Science degree where future pathways for students are either in research higher degrees or to the workforce with a future which will be increasingly data driven.
{"title":"Student responses to creative coding in biomedical science education","authors":"Phillip Gough, Oliver Bown, Craig R. Campbell, Philip Poronnik, Pauline M. Ross","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21692","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21692","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomedical science students need to learn to code. Graduates face a future where they will be better prepared for research higher degrees and the workforce if they can code. Embedding coding in a biomedical curriculum comes with challenges. First, biomedical science students often experience anxiety learning quantitative and computational thinking skills and second biomedical faculty often lack expertise required to teach coding. In this study, we describe a creative coding approach to building coding skills in students using the packages of Processing and Arduino. Biomedical science students were taught by an interdisciplinary faculty team from Medicine and Health, Science and Architecture, Design and Planning. We describe quantitative and qualitative responses of students to this approach. Cluster analysis revealed a diversity of student responses, with a large majority of students who supported creative coding in the curriculum, a smaller but vocal cluster, who did not support creative coding because either the exercises were not sufficiently challenging or were too challenging and believed coding should not be in a Biomedical Science curriculum. We describe how two creative coding platforms, Processing and Arduino, embedded and used to visualize human physiological data, and provide responses to students, including those minority of students, who are opposed to coding in the curriculum This study found a variety of students responses in a final year capstone course of an undergraduate Biomedical Science degree where future pathways for students are either in research higher degrees or to the workforce with a future which will be increasingly data driven.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"44-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/bf/BMB-51-44.PMC10099880.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9297245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to explore the strengths and weaknesses of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of its primary stakeholders, namely professors and students, and to provide practical solutions. Design is a qualitative study. We enrolled 22 faculty members and 58 students purposively. Research data were collected through a data collection checklist and via email and continued until the data were saturated. The qualitative content analyses were the basis of analysis in this study. Strengths were presented in 6 themes and 26 subthemes, weaknesses in 5 themes and 23 subthemes, and solutions were presented in 5 themes and 20 subthemes. Save money, time and energy; use modern software and educational technologies; and the ability to individualize education were among the strengths of e-learning. The most important weaknesses related to e-learning include infrastructure difficulties, problems related to the ability of professors and students to use educational systems. The most beneficial solutions offered included improving and upgrading the e-learning infrastructure, empowering professors and students to use educational systems. We concluded that using online teaching has many strengths as well as some weaknesses. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses can help policymakers plan better.
{"title":"Investigating the strengths and weaknesses of online education during COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of professors and students of medical universities and proposing solutions: A qualitative study","authors":"Hosein Ameri, Mina Mahami-Oskouei, Simin Sharafi, Saeede Saadatjoo, Maryam Miri, Morteza Arab-Zozani","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21691","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21691","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to explore the strengths and weaknesses of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of its primary stakeholders, namely professors and students, and to provide practical solutions. Design is a qualitative study. We enrolled 22 faculty members and 58 students purposively. Research data were collected through a data collection checklist and via email and continued until the data were saturated. The qualitative content analyses were the basis of analysis in this study. Strengths were presented in 6 themes and 26 subthemes, weaknesses in 5 themes and 23 subthemes, and solutions were presented in 5 themes and 20 subthemes. Save money, time and energy; use modern software and educational technologies; and the ability to individualize education were among the strengths of e-learning. The most important weaknesses related to e-learning include infrastructure difficulties, problems related to the ability of professors and students to use educational systems. The most beneficial solutions offered included improving and upgrading the e-learning infrastructure, empowering professors and students to use educational systems. We concluded that using online teaching has many strengths as well as some weaknesses. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses can help policymakers plan better.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877551/pdf/BMB-51-94.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10713445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Most textbooks and lecturers present Michaelis–Menten kinetics using the equation v = Vmax[S]/(Km + [S]). There are advantages to presenting this relationship in a slightly different form, namely v = Vmax/{1 + (Km/[S])}. We articulate advantages for single-substrate reactions and extend the formalism to include the three classes of bi-substrate reactions.
{"title":"A recommendation on the teaching of Michaelis–Menten kinetics in biochemistry courses","authors":"Andrew J. Howard","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21689","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21689","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most textbooks and lecturers present Michaelis–Menten kinetics using the equation <i>v</i> = <i>V</i><sub>max</sub>[S]/(<i>K</i><sub>m</sub> + [S]). There are advantages to presenting this relationship in a slightly different form, namely <i>v</i> = <i>V</i><sub>max</sub>/{1 + (<i>K</i><sub>m</sub>/[S])}. We articulate advantages for single-substrate reactions and extend the formalism to include the three classes of bi-substrate reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10702466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The COVID-19 pandemic created an unpredictable and stressful situation for both students and instructors. With current instruction largely occurring in an online environment, we propose that increased flexibility in course structure will best support student learning. Flexible course structure offers a trauma-aware approach to teaching, is in line with the Universal Design for Learning, and increases student motivation and meaningful learning. It can also provide more authentic experiences akin to science-based careers. We provide several specific suggestions for incorporating flexibility in one's class, as well as outline considerations and caveats. Our hope is that flexibility necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to inspire change in future course design and educational paradigms.
{"title":"The case for flexibility in online science courses: Strategies and caveats","authors":"Krystal Nunes, Nicole Laliberté, Fiona Rawle","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21690","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21690","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic created an unpredictable and stressful situation for both students and instructors. With current instruction largely occurring in an online environment, we propose that increased flexibility in course structure will best support student learning. Flexible course structure offers a trauma-aware approach to teaching, is in line with the Universal Design for Learning, and increases student motivation and meaningful learning. It can also provide more authentic experiences akin to science-based careers. We provide several specific suggestions for incorporating flexibility in one's class, as well as outline considerations and caveats. Our hope is that flexibility necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to inspire change in future course design and educational paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"89-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10713441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Helen Onyeaka, Paolo Passaretti, Taghi Miri, Abarasi Hart, Claudia Favero, Christian K. Anumudu, Phillip Robbins
The limited capabilities of teaching laboratories, combined with an increasing number of students enrolled in university, require constant augmentation of instructional approaches. By enhancing laboratory demonstrations with digital technology, these structural issues can be addressed while at the same time enhancing student understanding and learning. Our case study focuses on the fermentation lab part of the Reaction Equilibria and Thermodynamics (RET) module, a first-year chemical engineering course at the University of Birmingham. Video demonstrations were used to introduce students to the laboratory set-ups and walk them through each step and technique. The video demonstrations allowed the students to attend the in-person lab sessions having established knowledge and understanding of the processes involved and the outcomes desired, which decreased the burden on the facilities and the staff. A knowledge-based quiz and a student survey conducted at the end of the module showed that the pre-lab videos encouraged more active participation in the laboratory sessions and reinforced learning. Approximately 70% of the students polled in the first survey conducted within this project felt more confident going into the laboratory sessions after watching the pre-lab videos and attempting the knowledge quiz, while 92% of the students polled in the second survey judged the pre-lab video sessions as beneficial to them. Overall, the teaching method has the potential to improve student participation and access, boost confidence and learning, and provided a more structured and flexible approach to laboratory learning outcomes.
{"title":"Pre-lab video demonstrations to enhance students' laboratory experience in a first-year chemical engineering class","authors":"Helen Onyeaka, Paolo Passaretti, Taghi Miri, Abarasi Hart, Claudia Favero, Christian K. Anumudu, Phillip Robbins","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21688","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21688","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The limited capabilities of teaching laboratories, combined with an increasing number of students enrolled in university, require constant augmentation of instructional approaches. By enhancing laboratory demonstrations with digital technology, these structural issues can be addressed while at the same time enhancing student understanding and learning. Our case study focuses on the fermentation lab part of the Reaction Equilibria and Thermodynamics (RET) module, a first-year chemical engineering course at the University of Birmingham. Video demonstrations were used to introduce students to the laboratory set-ups and walk them through each step and technique. The video demonstrations allowed the students to attend the in-person lab sessions having established knowledge and understanding of the processes involved and the outcomes desired, which decreased the burden on the facilities and the staff. A knowledge-based quiz and a student survey conducted at the end of the module showed that the pre-lab videos encouraged more active participation in the laboratory sessions and reinforced learning. Approximately 70% of the students polled in the first survey conducted within this project felt more confident going into the laboratory sessions after watching the pre-lab videos and attempting the knowledge quiz, while 92% of the students polled in the second survey judged the pre-lab video sessions as beneficial to them. Overall, the teaching method has the potential to improve student participation and access, boost confidence and learning, and provided a more structured and flexible approach to laboratory learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/29/BMB-51-29.PMC10092182.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9351023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Teaching in the time of post-COVID-19","authors":"Phillip A. Ortiz","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21686","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21686","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"50 6","pages":"558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10323001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To kick things off in this new feature, which we call “DEIJA Views: International Conversations in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and Accessibility,” we write our own reflection on what DEIJA looks like in contemporary institutions of higher education in the United States. This reflection includes an examination of the beginnings of DEI work in the US, a view of where we currently stand, and a prospective look forward. We hope you, in turn, find inspiration to share your own view of DEIJA work in your community. In doing so, we hope to find commonalities and differences, challenges and opportunities, support and criticism from colleagues all around the world. As we begin, we recognize that we are writing this article from the ancestral lands of the Wahpekute and Mdewakanton bands of the Dakota Nation, currently occupied by Carleton College; as well as from the ancestral lands of the Onöñda'gaga, the Oneida Nation, the people of the Standing Stone, and the Susquehannock Nation, each belonging to the Haudenosaunee Alliance often called the Iroquois Confederacy, currently occupied by Juniata College. We honor with gratitude the people who have stewarded the land through the generations and their ongoing contributions to these regions. We acknowledge the ongoing injustices that have been committed against these peoples and Nations, and we wish to interrupt this legacy, beginning with acts of healing and honest storytelling about these places. We also recognize that our own experiences can influence the perspectives we share below, and we include a statement of positionality to situate our identities as educators in the context of this editorial (Box 1).
{"title":"DEIJA views: International conversations in diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and accessibility","authors":"Rou-Jia Sung, Daniel R. Dries","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21683","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bmb.21683","url":null,"abstract":"To kick things off in this new feature, which we call “DEIJA Views: International Conversations in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and Accessibility,” we write our own reflection on what DEIJA looks like in contemporary institutions of higher education in the United States. This reflection includes an examination of the beginnings of DEI work in the US, a view of where we currently stand, and a prospective look forward. We hope you, in turn, find inspiration to share your own view of DEIJA work in your community. In doing so, we hope to find commonalities and differences, challenges and opportunities, support and criticism from colleagues all around the world. As we begin, we recognize that we are writing this article from the ancestral lands of the Wahpekute and Mdewakanton bands of the Dakota Nation, currently occupied by Carleton College; as well as from the ancestral lands of the Onöñda'gaga, the Oneida Nation, the people of the Standing Stone, and the Susquehannock Nation, each belonging to the Haudenosaunee Alliance often called the Iroquois Confederacy, currently occupied by Juniata College. We honor with gratitude the people who have stewarded the land through the generations and their ongoing contributions to these regions. We acknowledge the ongoing injustices that have been committed against these peoples and Nations, and we wish to interrupt this legacy, beginning with acts of healing and honest storytelling about these places. We also recognize that our own experiences can influence the perspectives we share below, and we include a statement of positionality to situate our identities as educators in the context of this editorial (Box 1).","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10712653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}