首页 > 最新文献

Blood Pressure Monitoring最新文献

英文 中文
Validation of the ANDON KD-7920 wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020 protocol. 根据ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020协议,在普通人群中验证ANDON KD-7920腕压监测仪。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000740
Duan Li, Yiming Li, Jiaheng Li, Yuan Gu, Fujun Shang

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the ANDON KD-7920 oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020.

Methods: The same arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement among qualified participants according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020. The validation results were assessed following the criteria of the protocol, and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to present the difference between the test device and reference results.

Results: A total of 90 participants were included in the study. According to criterion 1 of the validation protocol, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference readings was 0.76 ± 6.23 mmHg and -0.13 ± 5.57 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which met the requirements of less than 5 ± 8 mmHg. According to the criterion 2, the average differences between the test device and reference readings per participant were 0.76 ± 5.56 mmHg and -0.13 ± 5.27 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which also met the requirements.

Conclusion: The ANDON KD-7920 wrist blood pressure monitor passed all the requirements of the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020 and can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in general population.

目的:本研究旨在根据ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020标准评估ANDON KD-7920振荡腕压监测仪在普通人群中的准确性。方法:根据ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020,对符合条件的参与者使用相同的臂序贯法测量血压。根据方案的标准评估验证结果,并使用Bland-Altman散点图来表示测试装置与参考结果之间的差异。结果:本研究共纳入90名受试者。根据验证方案标准1,试验装置的收缩压和舒张压与参考读数差值的平均值±SD分别为0.76±6.23 mmHg和-0.13±5.57 mmHg,满足小于5±8 mmHg的要求。根据标准2,每位受试者的收缩压和舒张压与参考读数的平均差异分别为0.76±5.56 mmHg和-0.13±5.27 mmHg,也符合要求。结论:安东KD-7920腕压监测仪通过了ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020的所有要求,可推荐临床使用和普通人群自我测量。
{"title":"Validation of the ANDON KD-7920 wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020 protocol.","authors":"Duan Li, Yiming Li, Jiaheng Li, Yuan Gu, Fujun Shang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000740","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the ANDON KD-7920 oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The same arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement among qualified participants according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020. The validation results were assessed following the criteria of the protocol, and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to present the difference between the test device and reference results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 participants were included in the study. According to criterion 1 of the validation protocol, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference readings was 0.76 ± 6.23 mmHg and -0.13 ± 5.57 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which met the requirements of less than 5 ± 8 mmHg. According to the criterion 2, the average differences between the test device and reference readings per participant were 0.76 ± 5.56 mmHg and -0.13 ± 5.27 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which also met the requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ANDON KD-7920 wrist blood pressure monitor passed all the requirements of the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020 and can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"93-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142999260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Microlife BP3T01-1B blood pressure monitoring device in adults and adolescents according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol. 根据ISO 81060-2:2018协议验证Microlife BP3T01-1B成人和青少年血压监测装置。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000739
Beate Botta, Carsten Bramlage, Violetta Hachaturyan, Lena Jost, Peter Bramlage

Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is crucial for the diagnosis and ongoing management of hypertension. Only devices that have been validated using an established protocol should be used to measure BP. The aim of this study was to validate the Microlife BP3T01-1B, an automated upper-arm BP measuring device, according to the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018) standard protocol.

Methods: BP measurements were performed in 85 adults and adolescents (age range: 13-86 years) using the same-arm sequential method of the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 protocol, alternating between the test device and a reference mercury sphygmomanometer.

Results: A total of 255 valid comparisons were available for the analysis of criterion 1. The mean ± SD difference between the test device and the reference device values was -2.56 ± 7.53 mmHg for SBP and -3.10 ± 5.65 mmHg for DBP. The mean differences met the pass criterion of less than or equal to ±5 mmHg and the SD values met the pass criterion of ≤8 mmHg. All 85 participants were included in the analysis of criterion 2. The mean ± SD intraindividual difference between the test and reference devices was -2.56 ± 6.15 mmHg for SBP and -3.10 ± 4.85 mmHg for DBP. Both were within the required pass range of SD ≤6.43 mmHg for SBP and SD ≤6.20 mmHg for DBP.

Conclusion: The Microlife BP3T01-1B BP monitoring device fulfilled the criteria of the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018) protocol in a general population and can be recommended for the measurement of BP in adults and adolescents.

背景:准确测量血压(BP)对高血压的诊断和持续治疗至关重要。只有已通过既定方案验证的设备才能用于测量血压。本研究的目的是根据DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018)标准协议验证Microlife BP3T01-1B,这是一种自动上臂血压测量装置。方法:采用DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11协议的同臂顺序法对85名成人和青少年(年龄范围:13-86岁)进行血压测量,在测试装置和参考汞血压计之间交替进行。结果:标准1的分析共有255个有效对照。试验装置与参考装置值的平均±SD差为收缩压-2.56±7.53 mmHg,舒张压-3.10±5.65 mmHg。平均差值满足小于等于±5 mmHg的通过标准,SD值满足≤8 mmHg的通过标准。所有85名参与者被纳入标准2的分析。试验装置与参考装置之间的个体内平均±SD差异为收缩压-2.56±6.15 mmHg,舒张压-3.10±4.85 mmHg。两者均在收缩压SD≤6.43 mmHg和舒张压SD≤6.20 mmHg的要求通过范围内。结论:Microlife BP3T01-1B血压监测装置在普通人群中符合DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018)协议的标准,可推荐用于成人和青少年的血压测量。
{"title":"Validation of the Microlife BP3T01-1B blood pressure monitoring device in adults and adolescents according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol.","authors":"Beate Botta, Carsten Bramlage, Violetta Hachaturyan, Lena Jost, Peter Bramlage","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000739","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000739","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is crucial for the diagnosis and ongoing management of hypertension. Only devices that have been validated using an established protocol should be used to measure BP. The aim of this study was to validate the Microlife BP3T01-1B, an automated upper-arm BP measuring device, according to the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018) standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BP measurements were performed in 85 adults and adolescents (age range: 13-86 years) using the same-arm sequential method of the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 protocol, alternating between the test device and a reference mercury sphygmomanometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 valid comparisons were available for the analysis of criterion 1. The mean ± SD difference between the test device and the reference device values was -2.56 ± 7.53 mmHg for SBP and -3.10 ± 5.65 mmHg for DBP. The mean differences met the pass criterion of less than or equal to ±5 mmHg and the SD values met the pass criterion of ≤8 mmHg. All 85 participants were included in the analysis of criterion 2. The mean ± SD intraindividual difference between the test and reference devices was -2.56 ± 6.15 mmHg for SBP and -3.10 ± 4.85 mmHg for DBP. Both were within the required pass range of SD ≤6.43 mmHg for SBP and SD ≤6.20 mmHg for DBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Microlife BP3T01-1B BP monitoring device fulfilled the criteria of the DIN EN ISO 81060-2:2018-11 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018) protocol in a general population and can be recommended for the measurement of BP in adults and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142999398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wide pulse pressure as a novel predictor of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. 宽脉压作为初步经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者造影剂引起的急性肾损伤的新预测因子。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000738
Cemalettin Yilmaz, Büşra Güvendi Şengör, Regayip Zehir, Ahmet Ferhat Kaya, Mehmet Hasan Özdil, Barkin Kültürsay

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) is pivotal in managing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, it introduces potential risks, such as contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pulse pressure (PP) and CI-AKI incidence in diabetic patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study conducted between 2021 and 2022, 590 diabetic STEMI patients undergoing p-PCI were categorized based on the presence of wide PP. Individuals with PP ≥ 65 mmHg were classified as the 'wide PP (+) group', while those with PP < 65 mmHg were classified as the 'wide PP (-) group'. To determine independent predictors of CI-AKI, multivariable logistic regression models were applied. After establishing the base model, blood pressure indices, including PP, SBP, DBP, mean arterial pressure, and pulsatility were added to the model using the stepwise selection method.

Results: Among the patients, 18.3% ( n  = 108) were in the wide PP (+) group, while 81.7% ( n  = 482) were in the wide PP (-) group. The incidence of hypertension, SBP, PP, and the risk of CI-AKI were higher in the wide PP (+) group. Multivariable analysis recognized PP, wide PP, and pulsatility as independent CI-AKI predictors [odds ratio (OR): 1.024, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003-1.045, P  = 0.025; OR: 1.684, 95% CI: 1.025-2.769, P  = 0.040; OR: 13.816, 95% CI: 2.069-92.245, P  = 0.007, respectively].

Conclusion: Increased PP emerges as an independent predictor for CI-AKI in diabetic patients undergoing p-PCI.

背景:原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(p-PCI)是治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的关键;然而,它引入了潜在的风险,如造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)。本研究旨在探讨糖尿病患者脉压(PP)与CI-AKI发生率的关系。方法:在这项于2021年至2022年进行的回顾性研究中,590名接受p-PCI治疗的糖尿病STEMI患者根据宽PP的存在进行分类。PP≥65 mmHg的个体被归类为“宽PP(+)组”,而PP患者则被归类为“宽PP(+)组”。结果:18.3% (n = 108)的患者属于宽PP(+)组,81.7% (n = 482)的患者属于宽PP(-)组。宽PP(+)组高血压、收缩压、PP发生率和CI-AKI风险较高。多变量分析发现PP、宽PP和脉搏是独立的CI- aki预测因子[比值比(OR): 1.024, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.003-1.045, P = 0.025;Or: 1.684, 95% ci: 1.025-2.769, p = 0.040;OR: 13.816, 95% CI: 2.069-92.245, P = 0.007]。结论:PP升高是行p-PCI的糖尿病患者CI-AKI的独立预测因子。
{"title":"Wide pulse pressure as a novel predictor of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Cemalettin Yilmaz, Büşra Güvendi Şengör, Regayip Zehir, Ahmet Ferhat Kaya, Mehmet Hasan Özdil, Barkin Kültürsay","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000738","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) is pivotal in managing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, it introduces potential risks, such as contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pulse pressure (PP) and CI-AKI incidence in diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study conducted between 2021 and 2022, 590 diabetic STEMI patients undergoing p-PCI were categorized based on the presence of wide PP. Individuals with PP ≥ 65 mmHg were classified as the 'wide PP (+) group', while those with PP < 65 mmHg were classified as the 'wide PP (-) group'. To determine independent predictors of CI-AKI, multivariable logistic regression models were applied. After establishing the base model, blood pressure indices, including PP, SBP, DBP, mean arterial pressure, and pulsatility were added to the model using the stepwise selection method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients, 18.3% ( n  = 108) were in the wide PP (+) group, while 81.7% ( n  = 482) were in the wide PP (-) group. The incidence of hypertension, SBP, PP, and the risk of CI-AKI were higher in the wide PP (+) group. Multivariable analysis recognized PP, wide PP, and pulsatility as independent CI-AKI predictors [odds ratio (OR): 1.024, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003-1.045, P  = 0.025; OR: 1.684, 95% CI: 1.025-2.769, P  = 0.040; OR: 13.816, 95% CI: 2.069-92.245, P  = 0.007, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased PP emerges as an independent predictor for CI-AKI in diabetic patients undergoing p-PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142999415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Power exercises with elastic bands combined with endurance training improve pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure, and functional parameters in older adults. 弹力带力量练习与耐力训练相结合可改善老年人的脉压、收缩压和功能参数。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000733
Luiz Filipe Costa Chaves, Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Samir Sotão, Thiago Matheus Sousa, Danielle da Silva Dias, Paulo Adriano Schwingel, Cristiano Mostarda

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of power training (PT) using elastic bands combined with endurance training (ET) on pulse pressure (PP), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP), autonomic response (AR), and functional parameters in older adults.

Methods: Thirty participants were randomly assigned to the control group ( n  = 15) and the intervention group (IG) ( n  = 15). IG participants performed PT with elastic bands combined with ET twice weekly for 8 weeks. PP, SBP, DBP, AR, and functional parameters were assessed before and after 8 weeks.

Results: PP, SBP, and functional parameters significantly improved after 8 weeks in the IG ( P  < 0.05). The study also found a clinically significant reduction in the SBP (Δ = -16.5 mmHg; η2p  = 0.36) and DBP (Δ = -4.3 mmHg; η2p  = 0.26), and a clinical reduction in the 5-Repetition Sit-To-Stand test ( η2p  = 0.63) and the elbow flexion test ( η2p  = 0.51).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that PT with elastic bands combined with ET improves PP, SBP, and functional parameters in older adults. Hence, our combined training protocol can be an easily accessible, low-cost, nonpharmacological strategy for strength, and conditioning professionals to prescribe as an exercise intervention to older adults.

研究目的本研究旨在探讨使用弹力带进行力量训练(PT)并结合耐力训练(ET)对老年人脉压(PP)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)、自律神经反应(AR)和功能参数的影响:将 30 名参与者随机分配到对照组(15 人)和干预组(15 人)。干预组参与者使用弹力带结合 ET 进行 PT,每周两次,持续 8 周。在 8 周前和 8 周后对 PP、SBP、DBP、AR 和功能参数进行评估:结果:8 周后,IG 的 PP、SBP 和功能参数均有明显改善(P < 0.05)。研究还发现,SBP(Δ = -16.5 mmHg;η2p = 0.36)和 DBP(Δ = -4.3 mmHg;η2p = 0.26)的临床降幅明显,5-重复坐立测试(η2p = 0.63)和肘关节屈曲测试(η2p = 0.51)的临床降幅也明显:我们的研究结果表明,使用弹力带进行 PT 并结合 ET 可改善老年人的 PP、SBP 和功能参数。因此,我们的综合训练方案可以成为一种方便、低成本、非药物性的策略,供力量和调理专业人员作为运动干预措施用于老年人。
{"title":"Power exercises with elastic bands combined with endurance training improve pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure, and functional parameters in older adults.","authors":"Luiz Filipe Costa Chaves, Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Samir Sotão, Thiago Matheus Sousa, Danielle da Silva Dias, Paulo Adriano Schwingel, Cristiano Mostarda","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000733","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of power training (PT) using elastic bands combined with endurance training (ET) on pulse pressure (PP), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP), autonomic response (AR), and functional parameters in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants were randomly assigned to the control group ( n  = 15) and the intervention group (IG) ( n  = 15). IG participants performed PT with elastic bands combined with ET twice weekly for 8 weeks. PP, SBP, DBP, AR, and functional parameters were assessed before and after 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PP, SBP, and functional parameters significantly improved after 8 weeks in the IG ( P  < 0.05). The study also found a clinically significant reduction in the SBP (Δ = -16.5 mmHg; η2p  = 0.36) and DBP (Δ = -4.3 mmHg; η2p  = 0.26), and a clinical reduction in the 5-Repetition Sit-To-Stand test ( η2p  = 0.63) and the elbow flexion test ( η2p  = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that PT with elastic bands combined with ET improves PP, SBP, and functional parameters in older adults. Hence, our combined training protocol can be an easily accessible, low-cost, nonpharmacological strategy for strength, and conditioning professionals to prescribe as an exercise intervention to older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of dynamic resistance training on postexercise hypotension and its mechanisms in hypertensive men. 动态阻力训练对高血压男性运动后低血压的影响及其机制。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000737
Rafael Yokoyama Fecchio, Julio C S de Sousa, Laura Oliveira-Silva, Natan D da Silva Junior, Andrea Pio-Abreu, Giovânio V da Silva, Luciano F Drager, David A Low, Cláudia L M Forjaz

Background: A possible chronic effect of exercise training is the attenuation of the acute decrease in blood pressure (BP) observed after the execution of a session of exercise [i.e. called postexercise hypotension (PEH)]. However, there are few empirical data regarding this issue, and the possible mechanisms involved in this blunted response have not been studied.

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of dynamic resistance training (DRT) on PEH and its systemic, vascular, and autonomic mechanisms.

Methods: Data from 16 middle-aged treated hypertensive men who underwent DRT (eight exercises, 50% of 1RM, three sets until moderate fatigue) three times/week for 10 weeks were analyzed. Before and after the training period, the participants underwent an experimental session in which BP (auscultation), systemic hemodynamics (CO 2 rebreathing), vascular function (duplex ultrasound), and cardiovascular autonomic modulation (spectral analysis of heart rate and BP variabilities) were assessed before and after a session of DRT.

Results: DRT reduced preexercise systolic BP and mitigated the systolic PEH that occurred before but not after the training period ( P  = 0.017). DRT did not change the diastolic PEH that occurred with similar magnitude before and after the training period ( P  = 0.024). DRT did not change the PEH mechanisms, except for cardiac sympathovagal balance that increased significantly more after the session of DRT conducted in the posttraining evaluation ( P  = 0.017).

Conclusion: In medicated hypertensive men, 10 weeks of DRT decreased preexercise systolic BP, abolished systolic PEH, and induced a greater increase in postdynamic resistance exercise sympathovagal balance.

背景:运动训练的一种可能的慢性效应是在进行一次运动后观察到的血压(BP)的急性下降(即称为运动后低血压(PEH))的衰减。然而,关于这一问题的经验数据很少,并且尚未研究这种迟钝反应的可能机制。目的:本研究旨在评估动态阻力训练(DRT)对PEH的影响及其系统、血管和自主机制。方法:对16名接受DRT治疗的中年高血压患者的数据进行分析(8项运动,50%的1RM, 3组直到中度疲劳),每周3次,持续10周。在训练前后,参与者进行了一次实验,在一次DRT前后评估血压(听诊)、全身血流动力学(二氧化碳再呼吸)、血管功能(双超声)和心血管自主调节(心率和血压变异的频谱分析)。结果:DRT降低了运动前的收缩压,减轻了训练前而非训练后的收缩性PEH (P = 0.017)。DRT没有改变训练前后相似程度的舒张性PEH (P = 0.024)。DRT没有改变PEH的机制,除了在训练后评估中进行DRT后,心脏交感迷走神经平衡显著增加(P = 0.017)。结论:在接受药物治疗的高血压患者中,10周DRT可降低运动前收缩压,消除收缩期PEH,并诱导运动后阻力运动交感迷走神经平衡显著增加。
{"title":"Effects of dynamic resistance training on postexercise hypotension and its mechanisms in hypertensive men.","authors":"Rafael Yokoyama Fecchio, Julio C S de Sousa, Laura Oliveira-Silva, Natan D da Silva Junior, Andrea Pio-Abreu, Giovânio V da Silva, Luciano F Drager, David A Low, Cláudia L M Forjaz","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000737","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A possible chronic effect of exercise training is the attenuation of the acute decrease in blood pressure (BP) observed after the execution of a session of exercise [i.e. called postexercise hypotension (PEH)]. However, there are few empirical data regarding this issue, and the possible mechanisms involved in this blunted response have not been studied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the effects of dynamic resistance training (DRT) on PEH and its systemic, vascular, and autonomic mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 16 middle-aged treated hypertensive men who underwent DRT (eight exercises, 50% of 1RM, three sets until moderate fatigue) three times/week for 10 weeks were analyzed. Before and after the training period, the participants underwent an experimental session in which BP (auscultation), systemic hemodynamics (CO 2 rebreathing), vascular function (duplex ultrasound), and cardiovascular autonomic modulation (spectral analysis of heart rate and BP variabilities) were assessed before and after a session of DRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DRT reduced preexercise systolic BP and mitigated the systolic PEH that occurred before but not after the training period ( P  = 0.017). DRT did not change the diastolic PEH that occurred with similar magnitude before and after the training period ( P  = 0.024). DRT did not change the PEH mechanisms, except for cardiac sympathovagal balance that increased significantly more after the session of DRT conducted in the posttraining evaluation ( P  = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In medicated hypertensive men, 10 weeks of DRT decreased preexercise systolic BP, abolished systolic PEH, and induced a greater increase in postdynamic resistance exercise sympathovagal balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142999317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Education differences in blood pressure trajectories by sex through midlife: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2018. 中年时期不同性别血压轨迹的教育差异:1999-2018年全国健康与营养调查的结果。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000726
Rose Calixte, Ayanna Besson, Kunika Chahal, Mark S Kaplan

Objective: Although it has long been established that age and sex play a role in blood pressure levels across the lifespan, the extent to which educational attainment moderates these relationships has been understudied. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess educational differences in SBP, DBP, and pulse pressure (PP) trajectories among men and women through the midlife years.

Method: We conducted an analysis of pooled data from the 1999 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to assess whether education moderates blood pressure measurements among men and women over the midlife years. Statistical analyses were performed using survey-weighted linear and quadratic regressions to assess these trajectories.

Results: During midlife, women with at least a college degree maintained the lowest average level of SBP compared to men at all education levels and women with a high school diploma or less. They also maintained the lowest level of PP, though not different from men with at least a college degree and women with less than a college degree. However, no educational differences were observed in DBP between men and women during the midlife years.

Conclusion: Our study shows clear delineation in the trajectories of PP and SBP by education such that a 4-year education is more protective than some college and a high school degree, particularly among women. These results highlight the need to consider upstream policy interventions (education policy initiatives) that could reduce population-wide elevated blood pressure.

目的:虽然年龄和性别在整个生命周期中对血压水平的影响早已得到证实,但教育程度在多大程度上调节了这些关系却一直未得到充分研究。因此,本研究旨在评估男性和女性在中年时期SBP、DBP和脉压(PP)轨迹的教育差异:我们对 1999 年至 2018 年全国健康与营养调查的汇总数据进行了分析,以评估教育程度是否会影响中年男性和女性的血压测量结果。使用调查加权线性和二次回归进行统计分析,以评估这些轨迹:结果:在中年时期,与所有教育水平的男性和只有高中或高中以下文凭的女性相比,至少拥有大学文凭的女性的 SBP 平均水平最低。尽管与至少拥有大学学历的男性和大学学历以下的女性相比没有差异,但她们的血压也保持在最低水平。然而,在中年时期,没有观察到男性和女性在 DBP 方面存在教育差异:结论:我们的研究表明,受教育程度不同,PP 和 SBP 的变化轨迹有明显的区别,四年制教育比大专和高中学历更具有保护作用,尤其是对女性而言。这些结果突出表明,有必要考虑上游政策干预措施(教育政策措施),以降低整个人群的血压升高。
{"title":"Education differences in blood pressure trajectories by sex through midlife: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2018.","authors":"Rose Calixte, Ayanna Besson, Kunika Chahal, Mark S Kaplan","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000726","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000726","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although it has long been established that age and sex play a role in blood pressure levels across the lifespan, the extent to which educational attainment moderates these relationships has been understudied. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess educational differences in SBP, DBP, and pulse pressure (PP) trajectories among men and women through the midlife years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an analysis of pooled data from the 1999 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to assess whether education moderates blood pressure measurements among men and women over the midlife years. Statistical analyses were performed using survey-weighted linear and quadratic regressions to assess these trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During midlife, women with at least a college degree maintained the lowest average level of SBP compared to men at all education levels and women with a high school diploma or less. They also maintained the lowest level of PP, though not different from men with at least a college degree and women with less than a college degree. However, no educational differences were observed in DBP between men and women during the midlife years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows clear delineation in the trajectories of PP and SBP by education such that a 4-year education is more protective than some college and a high school degree, particularly among women. These results highlight the need to consider upstream policy interventions (education policy initiatives) that could reduce population-wide elevated blood pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654444/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High job stress evaluated using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire as an independent risk factor for hypertension among a Japanese male occupational population. 使用简要工作压力问卷评估高工作压力作为日本男性职业人群高血压的独立危险因素。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000730
Hiromitsu Sekizuka, Hirohisa Kato, Toshiya Ishii, Satoko Nagumo

Objective: Stress and working environments are risk factors for hypertension. A new occupational health policy called the Stress Check Program was started in Japan in 2015. Therefore, we clarified whether the presence or absence of high job stress (HJS) as determined using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is related to the comorbidity of hypertension.

Methods: The results of a single year's BJSQ and medical examinations were investigated for 18 629 active Japanese male office workers who were 30-59 years old. The presence or absence of HJS was assessed using the BJSQ and investigated using a personal computer in a medical interview. Furthermore, the relationships between HJS and hypertension comorbidity were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the subjects was 43.8 ± 10.3 years old, and the proportion of subjects with HJS was 10%. After adjustment for age and lifestyle habits, HJS was associated with a risk of hypertension comorbidity (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.36; P = 0.022). HJS was a significant hypertensive comorbidity factor.

Conclusion: HJS measured using the BJSQ independently contributed to hypertension comorbidity among male office workers.

目的:压力和工作环境是高血压的危险因素。2015年,日本启动了一项名为“压力检查计划”的新职业健康政策。因此,我们澄清了使用简要工作压力问卷(BJSQ)确定的高工作压力(HJS)的存在或不存在是否与高血压合并症有关。方法:对18 629名30 ~ 59岁的日本在职男性上班族进行1年BJSQ和体格检查。使用BJSQ评估HJS的存在与否,并在医学访谈中使用个人电脑进行调查。进一步分析HJS与高血压合并症的关系。结果:受试者平均年龄为43.8±10.3岁,HJS患者比例为10%。在调整年龄和生活习惯后,HJS与高血压合并症的风险相关(优势比,1.18;95%置信区间为1.02-1.36;p = 0.022)。HJS是高血压的重要合并症因素。结论:使用BJSQ独立测量的HJS与男性办公室工作人员的高血压合并症有关。
{"title":"High job stress evaluated using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire as an independent risk factor for hypertension among a Japanese male occupational population.","authors":"Hiromitsu Sekizuka, Hirohisa Kato, Toshiya Ishii, Satoko Nagumo","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000730","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stress and working environments are risk factors for hypertension. A new occupational health policy called the Stress Check Program was started in Japan in 2015. Therefore, we clarified whether the presence or absence of high job stress (HJS) as determined using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is related to the comorbidity of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of a single year's BJSQ and medical examinations were investigated for 18 629 active Japanese male office workers who were 30-59 years old. The presence or absence of HJS was assessed using the BJSQ and investigated using a personal computer in a medical interview. Furthermore, the relationships between HJS and hypertension comorbidity were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the subjects was 43.8 ± 10.3 years old, and the proportion of subjects with HJS was 10%. After adjustment for age and lifestyle habits, HJS was associated with a risk of hypertension comorbidity (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.36; P = 0.022). HJS was a significant hypertensive comorbidity factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HJS measured using the BJSQ independently contributed to hypertension comorbidity among male office workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":"30 1","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of wearing N95 masks for 10 hours on ambulatory blood pressure in healthy adults. 佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时对健康成年人活动血压的影响。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000729
Zachary Zeigler, Anthony Acevedo, Isiaha Mews, Dalton Lesser, Abby Koornneef

The impact of wearing a face mask for an extended duration is unknown. This study aimed to determine if wearing a face mask for 10 h impacts blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness. Subjects received an ambulatory blood pressure cuff and were asked to wear it for 10 h while readings were taken every 15 min. During the face mask trial, subjects wore an N95 mask for 10 h. During the control, subjects did not wear a mask. Subjects were randomized to start their trial. An accelerometer was given to ensure no physical activity differences. Linear mixed models were used to determine group differences, and McNemar test was used to assess frequency differences when determining BP load. Twelve college-aged (20.5 ± 1.5 years) male ( n  = 5) and female ( n  = 7) individuals with normal BP participated in this study. There were no differences in time spent in any physical activity domain (all P  > 0.05). There was no difference in brachial SBP ( P  = 0.688), brachial DBP ( P  = 0.063), central SBP ( P  = 0.875), central DBP ( P  = 0.246), heart rate ( P  = 0.125), and augmentation pressure ( P  = 0.158) between conditions. During mask condition, augmentation pressure was reduced by 5.2 ± 3.1% compared to control ( P  < 0.001). There were no frequency differences in the number of BP readings above 140 mmHg for SBP ( P  = 0.479) and >90 mmHg for DBP ( P  = 0.212). The current study found that wearing an N95 mask for 10 h did not affect brachial or central BP but significantly decreased augmentation pressure.

长时间佩戴口罩的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定戴口罩 10 小时是否会影响血压(BP)和动脉僵化。受试者收到一个动态血压袖带,并被要求佩戴 10 小时,每隔 15 分钟测量一次血压。在面罩试验期间,受试者佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时。受试者随机开始试验。受试者佩戴加速度计,以确保没有体力活动差异。在确定血压负荷时,使用线性混合模型确定组间差异,并使用 McNemar 检验评估频率差异。12 名大学年龄(20.5 ± 1.5 岁)、血压正常的男性(5 人)和女性(7 人)参加了这项研究。他们在任何体力活动领域花费的时间均无差异(P>0.05)。不同条件下的肱动脉SBP(P = 0.688)、肱动脉DBP(P = 0.063)、中心SBP(P = 0.875)、中心DBP(P = 0.246)、心率(P = 0.125)和增强压(P = 0.158)均无差异。在掩蔽条件下,增强压比对照组降低了 5.2 ± 3.1%(P < 0.001)。在血压读数超过 140 mmHg(SBP)(P = 0.479)和 >90 mmHg(DBP)(P = 0.212)时,没有频率差异。本研究发现,佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时不会影响肱动脉血压或中心血压,但会显著降低增强压。
{"title":"Effect of wearing N95 masks for 10 hours on ambulatory blood pressure in healthy adults.","authors":"Zachary Zeigler, Anthony Acevedo, Isiaha Mews, Dalton Lesser, Abby Koornneef","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000729","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000729","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of wearing a face mask for an extended duration is unknown. This study aimed to determine if wearing a face mask for 10 h impacts blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness. Subjects received an ambulatory blood pressure cuff and were asked to wear it for 10 h while readings were taken every 15 min. During the face mask trial, subjects wore an N95 mask for 10 h. During the control, subjects did not wear a mask. Subjects were randomized to start their trial. An accelerometer was given to ensure no physical activity differences. Linear mixed models were used to determine group differences, and McNemar test was used to assess frequency differences when determining BP load. Twelve college-aged (20.5 ± 1.5 years) male ( n  = 5) and female ( n  = 7) individuals with normal BP participated in this study. There were no differences in time spent in any physical activity domain (all P  > 0.05). There was no difference in brachial SBP ( P  = 0.688), brachial DBP ( P  = 0.063), central SBP ( P  = 0.875), central DBP ( P  = 0.246), heart rate ( P  = 0.125), and augmentation pressure ( P  = 0.158) between conditions. During mask condition, augmentation pressure was reduced by 5.2 ± 3.1% compared to control ( P  < 0.001). There were no frequency differences in the number of BP readings above 140 mmHg for SBP ( P  = 0.479) and >90 mmHg for DBP ( P  = 0.212). The current study found that wearing an N95 mask for 10 h did not affect brachial or central BP but significantly decreased augmentation pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor in different positions according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020). 根据 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准(ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020),对 G.LAB MD6300 上臂血压计的不同位置进行验证。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000732
Rui Cheng, Linyi Li, Jinfeng Chen, Jie Ren, Yi Wan

Objective: To validate the accuracy of the G.LAB MD6300 oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor in the sitting, supine, and right lateral decubitus position in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020).

Methods: The qualified participants were recruited in the study and the same left-arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement according to the Universal Standard. The validation results were assessed for the three positions and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to show the difference between the test device and reference results.

Results: A total of 85 participants were included in the analysis. The mean differences between the test device and reference readings were 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg, 0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg, and - 0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg for SBP and DBP for the validation criterion 1 in the sitting position, supine with upward palm position, and right lateral decubitus position with downward left palm flat on left side position, respectively. Furthermore, the mean differences and their standard deviations for SBP and DBP calculated according to criterion 2 in the ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 were acceptable in all three positions.

Conclusion: The G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor fulfilled the validation criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) in the sitting position, and its accuracy in the supine and right lateral decubitus position was acceptable and roughly equivalent to that in the sitting position. Therefore, it can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in the general population.

目的根据美国医学仪器促进协会/欧洲高血压学会/国际标准化组织(AAMI/ESH/ISO)通用标准(ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020),验证 G.LAB MD6300示波上臂式血压计在普通人群中坐位、仰卧位和右侧卧位的准确性:研究招募了合格的参与者,并根据通用标准使用相同的左臂顺序法进行血压测量。对三个位置的验证结果进行评估,并使用布兰-阿尔特曼散点图来显示测试设备与参考结果之间的差异:结果:共有 85 名参与者参与了分析。对于验证标准 1,在坐位、仰卧位手掌向上、右侧卧位左手掌向下平放在左侧位置时,测试设备和参考读数的平均差分别为 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg、0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg 和 -0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg。此外,根据 ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 标准 2 计算的 SBP 和 DBP 的平均差及其标准偏差在所有三种体位下均可接受:G.LAB MD6300 上臂式血压计在坐位时符合 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准 (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) 的验证标准,在仰卧位和右侧卧位时的准确度也可以接受,与坐位时的准确度基本相当。因此,可以建议将其用于临床和普通人群的自我测量。
{"title":"Validation of the G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor in different positions according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020).","authors":"Rui Cheng, Linyi Li, Jinfeng Chen, Jie Ren, Yi Wan","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000732","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000732","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the accuracy of the G.LAB MD6300 oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor in the sitting, supine, and right lateral decubitus position in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The qualified participants were recruited in the study and the same left-arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement according to the Universal Standard. The validation results were assessed for the three positions and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to show the difference between the test device and reference results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 participants were included in the analysis. The mean differences between the test device and reference readings were 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg, 0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg, and - 0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg for SBP and DBP for the validation criterion 1 in the sitting position, supine with upward palm position, and right lateral decubitus position with downward left palm flat on left side position, respectively. Furthermore, the mean differences and their standard deviations for SBP and DBP calculated according to criterion 2 in the ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 were acceptable in all three positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor fulfilled the validation criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) in the sitting position, and its accuracy in the supine and right lateral decubitus position was acceptable and roughly equivalent to that in the sitting position. Therefore, it can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening for orthostatic hypotension and de-escalation of antihypertensives: insight into confounding factors, alternative methods of diagnosis, and recent studies. 筛查体位性低血压和降压药物的降级:对混杂因素、替代诊断方法和最新研究的见解。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000720
Rhea Trivedi, Sameer Ahmad, Aayush Visaria
{"title":"Screening for orthostatic hypotension and de-escalation of antihypertensives: insight into confounding factors, alternative methods of diagnosis, and recent studies.","authors":"Rhea Trivedi, Sameer Ahmad, Aayush Visaria","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000720","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":"30 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1