Sarah G. Hoffman, Luke R. Benson, Conner S. Philson, Rachel Y. Chock, Joseph N. Curti, César F. Flores-Negrón, Gregory F. Grether
Mutualistic interactions between species are widespread and important for community structure and ecosystem function. In a changing environment, the proximate mechanisms that maintain mutualisms affect their stability and susceptibility to perturbation. In ant-plant mutualisms, ants defend their host plants against herbivores or competing plants in exchange for housing or food. While the phenomenon of species exchanging services for resources is well documented, how such arrangements are maintained is not. There are at least four hypothesized mechanisms through which plants use sugar to induce ant defense against herbivores. Three such hypotheses (“deficit”, “fuel for foraging”, “predictable rewards”) predict that the appearance of a new sugar source near the host plant would increase the rate of ant attacks against herbivores, but the fourth hypothesis (“attract and distract”) predicts the opposite. To examine how the mutualism between Triplaris americana and Pseudomyrmex dendroicus would be affected, we simulated the appearance of a novel sugar source at a random half of 34 T. americana trees with P. dendroicus colonies. Compared to control colonies, those with access to the sugar source were less likely to attack herbivorous insects (Nasutitermes sp. termites). Thus, our findings support the “attract and distract” hypothesis. We infer that this ant-plant mutualism could be destabilized by the appearance of an alternative sugar source, such as a nectar-producing plant or honeydew-excreting insect. More broadly, we conclude that the mechanisms responsible for maintaining mutualistic relationships are relevant for understanding how ecological communities are affected by environmental change.
Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.
{"title":"Reduction in mutualistic ant aggressive behavior upon sugar supplementation","authors":"Sarah G. Hoffman, Luke R. Benson, Conner S. Philson, Rachel Y. Chock, Joseph N. Curti, César F. Flores-Negrón, Gregory F. Grether","doi":"10.1111/btp.13390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13390","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mutualistic interactions between species are widespread and important for community structure and ecosystem function. In a changing environment, the proximate mechanisms that maintain mutualisms affect their stability and susceptibility to perturbation. In ant-plant mutualisms, ants defend their host plants against herbivores or competing plants in exchange for housing or food. While the phenomenon of species exchanging services for resources is well documented, how such arrangements are maintained is not. There are at least four hypothesized mechanisms through which plants use sugar to induce ant defense against herbivores. Three such hypotheses (“deficit”, “fuel for foraging”, “predictable rewards”) predict that the appearance of a new sugar source near the host plant would increase the rate of ant attacks against herbivores, but the fourth hypothesis (“attract and distract”) predicts the opposite. To examine how the mutualism between <i>Triplaris americana</i> and <i>Pseudomyrmex dendroicus</i> would be affected, we simulated the appearance of a novel sugar source at a random half of 34 <i>T. americana</i> trees with <i>P. dendroicus</i> colonies<i>.</i> Compared to control colonies, those with access to the sugar source were less likely to attack herbivorous insects (<i>Nasutitermes</i> sp. termites). Thus, our findings support the “attract and distract” hypothesis. We infer that this ant-plant mutualism could be destabilized by the appearance of an alternative sugar source, such as a nectar-producing plant or honeydew-excreting insect. More broadly, we conclude that the mechanisms responsible for maintaining mutualistic relationships are relevant for understanding how ecological communities are affected by environmental change.</p><p>Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.13390","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142665921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The ecosystems of The Tropics comprise a majority of the planet's biodiversity, approximately 40% of its terrestrial surface area, and half the human population. Despite this, Tropical Biology has historically been conceptualized as a specialized subdiscipline of the Biological Sciences. I assessed the validity of this assumption and conclude that it depends on the framework and evidence used to evaluate it. I suggest that the way forward as a discipline is not for Tropical Biologists to drop the geographic adjective that unites them, but to recenter The Tropics as the foundation of ecology and evolutionary biology.
Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.
{"title":"Is there really such a thing as Tropical Biology?","authors":"Emilio M. Bruna","doi":"10.1111/btp.13387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13387","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ecosystems of The Tropics comprise a majority of the planet's biodiversity, approximately 40% of its terrestrial surface area, and half the human population. Despite this, Tropical Biology has historically been conceptualized as a specialized subdiscipline of the Biological Sciences. I assessed the validity of this assumption and conclude that it depends on the framework and evidence used to evaluate it. I suggest that the way forward as a discipline is not for Tropical Biologists to drop the geographic adjective that unites them, but to recenter The Tropics as the foundation of ecology and evolutionary biology.</p><p>Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142748880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Change in land-use patterns affects a landscape by changing the composition of local flora and fauna. The lateritic plateaus in Konkan are one such example of this rapid land-use change. Although these plateaus are rich in endemic flora and fauna, they are considered as “wastelands” due to lack of woody vegetation and thus, are subjected to various land-uses. Mango cultivation in this region has become a major source of income due to its Alphonso variety of mangoes. Hence, over the last few decades, many plateaus have been converted into mango orchards. However, how the conversion of plateaus to mango orchards has affected species composition of different groups of organisms remains unclear. In the present study, we sampled the lateritic plateaus and plateaus converted into mango orchards in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, to investigate the response of the reptile communities. We observed more species heterogeneity in the orchards compared to the unaltered sites. Moreover, it appeared that there was a species turnover when the plateaus were converted into orchards. The generalist and widespread species such as agamids and skinks and very few specialist species were comparatively more abundant in the orchards. On the contrary, the plateaus without orchards harbored more specialist species such as Hemidactylus albofasciatus (n = 62, in unaltered sites vs. n = 5 in the orchards), Echis carinatus (n = 15 in unaltered sites and none in the orchards) and Ophisops jerdonii (n = 45 in unaltered site vs. n = 12 in the orchards) compared to the generalist species.
{"title":"More the merrier? influence of mango orchards on the composition of the reptile communities of the lateritic plateaus, Maharashtra, India","authors":"Prathamesh Amberkar, Rahul Mungikar","doi":"10.1111/btp.13388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13388","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Change in land-use patterns affects a landscape by changing the composition of local flora and fauna. The lateritic plateaus in Konkan are one such example of this rapid land-use change. Although these plateaus are rich in endemic flora and fauna, they are considered as “wastelands” due to lack of woody vegetation and thus, are subjected to various land-uses. Mango cultivation in this region has become a major source of income due to its Alphonso variety of mangoes. Hence, over the last few decades, many plateaus have been converted into mango orchards. However, how the conversion of plateaus to mango orchards has affected species composition of different groups of organisms remains unclear. In the present study, we sampled the lateritic plateaus and plateaus converted into mango orchards in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, to investigate the response of the reptile communities. We observed more species heterogeneity in the orchards compared to the unaltered sites. Moreover, it appeared that there was a species turnover when the plateaus were converted into orchards. The generalist and widespread species such as agamids and skinks and very few specialist species were comparatively more abundant in the orchards. On the contrary, the plateaus without orchards harbored more specialist species such as <i>Hemidactylus albofasciatus</i> (<i>n</i> = 62, in unaltered sites vs. <i>n</i> = 5 in the orchards), <i>Echis carinatus</i> (<i>n</i> = 15 in unaltered sites and none in the orchards) and <i>Ophisops jerdonii</i> (<i>n</i> = 45 in unaltered site vs. <i>n</i> = 12 in the orchards) compared to the generalist species.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142665927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}