BJU International最新文献

Background: Metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC) presents a therapeutic challenge despite advancements in treatment. Once mCRPC is attained, patients face limited survival prospects. Next-line systemic treatment (NEST) is the standard of care for progressive mCRPC, encompassing various therapeutic options with associated toxicity and costs. In patients with oligoprogressive mCRPC, data suggest that progression-directed therapy (PDT), such as metastasectomy or stereotactic body radiotherapy, delays the initiation of NEST.

Methods and design: The MEDCARE phase III trial aims to assess the impact of PDT on overall survival (OS) in oligoprogressive mCRPC. In this multicentric, randomised, prospective trial, we aim to randomise 246 patients in 1:1 allocation ratio between the standard-of-care therapy (surveillance or NEST) or PDT while continuing the current systemic treatment. Patients will be stratified based on number of progressive lesions (one vs ≥one), location of progressive lesions (local recurrence, N or M1a vs M1b or M1c) and previous systemic therapy (palliative androgen-deprivation therapy [pADT] vs pADT + androgen receptor-targeted agent or patients who received docetaxel in the past). The primary endpoint is OS, and the secondary endpoints include quality of life, radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), modified PFS, prostate cancer-specific survival and PDT-induced toxicity.

Discussion: This is the first randomised phase 3 trial in the setting of PDT in patients with oligoprogressive mCRPC with OS as the primary endpoint.

Objective: To further evaluate a genomic classifier (GC) in a cohort of patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-based genomic profiling has suggested utility in identifying a distinct tumour subgroup corresponding to a favourable prognosis in patients with bladder cancer.

Patients and methods: Transcriptome-wide expression profiling using Decipher Bladder was performed on transurethral resection of bladder tumour samples from a cohort of patients with high-grade, clinically organ-confined (cTa-T2N0M0) urothelial carcinoma (UC) who subsequently underwent RC without any neoadjuvant therapy (n = 226). The lncRNA-based luminal favourable status was determined using a previously developed GC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after RC. Secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality and upstaging at RC.

Results: In the study, 134 patients were clinical non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cTa/Tis/T1) and 92 patients were cT2. We identified 60 patients with luminal favourable subtype, all of which showed robust gene expression patterns associated with less aggressive bladder cancer biology. On multivariate analysis, patients with the luminal favourable subtype (vs without) were significantly associated with lower odds of upstaging to pathological (p)T3+ disease (odds ratio [OR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.82; P = 0.02), any upstaging (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83; P = 0.01), and any upstaging and/or pN+ (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-1.00; P = 0.05). Luminal favourable bladder cancer was significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.74; P = 0.007).

Conclusions: This study validates the performance of the GC for identifying UCs with a luminal favourable subtype, harbouring less aggressive tumour biology.

Objective: To conduct a population-based study examining cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) differences in patients with radiation-induced secondary bladder cancer (RT-BCa) vs those with primary bladder cancer (pBCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified patients with T_2-4N_0-3M₀ bladder cancer treated with RC, who had previously been treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy for prostate cancer, as well as patients with T_2-4N_0-3M₀ pBCa treated with RC. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were used to assess CSM after additional adjustment for OCM. The same methodology was then repeated based on organ-confined (OC: T₂N₀M₀) and non-organ-confined (NOC: T_3-4 and/or N_1-3) disease.

Results: Of 9957 RC patients, RT-BCa was identified in 347 (3%) compared with 9610 (97%) who had pBCa. In multivariable CRR models, no CSM differences were recorded in the overall comparison (P = 0.8), nor in sub-groups based on OC and NOC disease (P = 0.8 and 0.7, respectively). Conversely, multivariable CRR models identified RT-BCa as an independent predictor of 1.3-fold higher OCM in the overall cohort and of 1.5-fold higher OCM in those with NOC disease. In a sensitivity analysis of patients with NOC disease, EBRT was associated with higher OCM rates (hazard ratio 1.5). By contrast, OCM rates were not different in those with OC disease (P = 0.8).

Conclusion: Our study showed that RC for RT-BCa was associated with similar CSM rates as RC for pBCa, regardless of disease stage. However, patients who had undergone EBRT exhibited significantly higher OCM in the NOC sub-group.