首页 > 最新文献

BJU International最新文献

英文 中文
October's reviewers of the month 十月份的月度评论员
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16524
{"title":"October's reviewers of the month","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bju.16524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"134 4","pages":"509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142313307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whole‐body MRI for staging prostate cancer: a narrative review 用于前列腺癌分期的全身核磁共振成像:叙述性综述
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16514
Andrew M. Fang, Justin R. Gregg, Curtis Pettaway, Jingfei Ma, Janio Szklaruk, Tharakeswara K. Bathala, Devaki Shilpa S. Surasi, Brian F. Chapin
ObjectiveTo present a narrative review regarding the diagnostic accuracy of whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in staging patients with high‐risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) and compare it to established imaging modalities.MethodsA narrative review was carried out using PubMed using the following keywords: ‘whole body’, ‘magnetic resonance imaging’, ‘MRI’, ‘prostate cancer’, ‘risk stratification’, and ‘staging’. Articles that evaluated WBMRI as the imaging modality to stage patients with HRPCa were included, while studies that solely assessed for biochemical recurrence or metastatic disease progression were excluded.ResultsIn the evaluation of lymphatic metastases, WBMRI has demonstrated a comparable, if not improved, sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging of computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, WBMRI demonstrates improved sensitivity and specificity in detecting bone metastases compared to bone scintigraphy (BS). However, with advent of prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands for positron emission tomography (PET), the diagnostic performance of WBMRI to detect metastatic disease appears inferior.ConclusionsThe diagnostic capabilities of WBMRI exceed that of conventional imaging of CT and BS in detecting metastatic disease in patients with HRPCa. However, WBMRI does not perform as well as PSMA PET/CT. Further study on cost comparisons between WBMRI and PSMA PET/CT are needed, as well as evaluations of combined PSMA PET/MRI are needed.
目的就全身磁共振成像(WBMRI)在对高危前列腺癌(HRPCa)患者进行分期时的诊断准确性进行综述,并将其与已有的成像模式进行比较:全身"、"磁共振成像"、"MRI"、"前列腺癌"、"风险分层 "和 "分期"。结果 在评估淋巴转移方面,与传统的计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,WBMRI 的灵敏度和特异性即使没有提高,也不相上下。此外,与骨闪烁成像(BS)相比,WBMRI 在检测骨转移方面的灵敏度和特异性也有所提高。结论在检测 HRPCa 患者的转移性疾病方面,WBMRI 的诊断能力超过了传统的 CT 和 BS 成像。然而,WBMRI 的表现不如 PSMA PET/CT。需要进一步研究 WBMRI 和 PSMA PET/CT 的成本比较,并对 PSMA PET/MRI 进行联合评估。
{"title":"Whole‐body MRI for staging prostate cancer: a narrative review","authors":"Andrew M. Fang, Justin R. Gregg, Curtis Pettaway, Jingfei Ma, Janio Szklaruk, Tharakeswara K. Bathala, Devaki Shilpa S. Surasi, Brian F. Chapin","doi":"10.1111/bju.16514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16514","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo present a narrative review regarding the diagnostic accuracy of whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in staging patients with high‐risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) and compare it to established imaging modalities.MethodsA narrative review was carried out using PubMed using the following keywords: ‘whole body’, ‘magnetic resonance imaging’, ‘MRI’, ‘prostate cancer’, ‘risk stratification’, and ‘staging’. Articles that evaluated WBMRI as the imaging modality to stage patients with HRPCa were included, while studies that solely assessed for biochemical recurrence or metastatic disease progression were excluded.ResultsIn the evaluation of lymphatic metastases, WBMRI has demonstrated a comparable, if not improved, sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging of computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, WBMRI demonstrates improved sensitivity and specificity in detecting bone metastases compared to bone scintigraphy (BS). However, with advent of prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands for positron emission tomography (PET), the diagnostic performance of WBMRI to detect metastatic disease appears inferior.ConclusionsThe diagnostic capabilities of WBMRI exceed that of conventional imaging of CT and BS in detecting metastatic disease in patients with HRPCa. However, WBMRI does not perform as well as PSMA PET/CT. Further study on cost comparisons between WBMRI and PSMA PET/CT are needed, as well as evaluations of combined PSMA PET/MRI are needed.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"601 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142276941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in the characterisation of indeterminate renal masses: a pilot study 使用 99mTc-tetrofosmin 对不确定的肾肿块进行定性:一项试点研究
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16507
Ergi Spiro, Salikh Murtazaliev, Alireza Amindarolzarbi, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Krystyna M. Jones, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Basil Kaufmann, Mohamad E. Allaf, Christian P. Pavlovich, Nirmish Singla, Lilja B. Solnes, Michael A. Gorin, Steven P. Rowe
{"title":"The use of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in the characterisation of indeterminate renal masses: a pilot study","authors":"Ergi Spiro, Salikh Murtazaliev, Alireza Amindarolzarbi, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Krystyna M. Jones, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Basil Kaufmann, Mohamad E. Allaf, Christian P. Pavlovich, Nirmish Singla, Lilja B. Solnes, Michael A. Gorin, Steven P. Rowe","doi":"10.1111/bju.16507","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bju.16507","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"134 6","pages":"929-931"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142276802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microwave vs radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses: perioperative and oncological outcomes 微波与射频消融术治疗肾脏小肿块:围手术期和肿瘤学结果
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16528
Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Franco Orsi, Stefano Luzzago, Giovanni Mauri, Francesco A. Mistretta, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Chiara Vaccaro, Marco Tozzi, Daniele Maiettini, Gianluca Varano, Stefano Caramella, Paolo Della Vigna, Matteo Ferro, Guido Bonomo, Zhe Tian, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Ottavio De Cobelli, Gennaro Musi
ObjectiveTo conduct a comprehensive comparison of microwave ablation (MWA) vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA) outcomes in the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs), specifically: TRIFECTA ([i] complete ablation, [ii] absence of Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III complications, and [iii] absence of ≥30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate) achievement, operative time (OT), and local recurrence rate (LRR).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 531 patients with SRMs (clinical T1a–b) treated with MWA or RFA at a single centre (2008–2022). First, multivariable logistic regression models were used for testing TRIFECTA achievement. Second, multivariable Poisson regression models were used to evaluate variables associated with longer OT. Finally, Kaplan–Meier plots depicted LRR over time. All analyses were repeated after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsOf 531 patients with SRMs, 373/531 (70.2%) underwent MWA and 158/531 (29.8%) RFA. MWA demonstrated superior TRIFECTA achievement (314/373 [84.2%]) compared to RFA (114/158 [72.2%], P = 0.001). These differences were driven by higher rates of complete ablation in MWA‐ vs RFA‐treated patients (348/373 [93.3%] vs 137/158 [86.7%], P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models, MWA was associated with higher TRIFECTA achievement, compared to RFA, before (odds ratio [OR] 1.92, P = 0.008) and after PSM (OR 1.99, P = 0.023). Finally, the median OT was shorter for MWA vs RFA (105 vs 115 min; P = 0.002). At Poisson regression analyses, MWA predicted shorter OT before (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.86, P < 0.001) and after PSM (IRR 0.85, P < 0.001). Local recurrence occurred in 17/373 (4.6%) MWA‐treated patients and 21/158 (13.3%) RFA‐treated patients (P = 0.29) after a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 24 (8–46) months. There were no differences in the LRR in Kaplan–Meier plots before (P = 0.29) and after PSM (P = 0.42).ConclusionMicrowave ablation provides higher TRIFECTA achievement, and shorter OT than RFA. No significant differences were found regarding the LRR.
目的对微波消融(MWA)与射频消融(RFA)治疗肾小肿块(SRM)的疗效进行综合比较,特别是:TRIFECTA([i]完全消融,[ii]无 Clavien-Dindo ≥III 级并发症,[iii]无估计肾小球滤过率下降≥30%)成就、手术时间 (OT) 和局部复发率 (LRR)。患者和方法我们回顾性分析了在一个中心接受 MWA 或 RFA 治疗的 531 例 SRM(临床 T1a-b)患者(2008-2022)。首先,使用多变量逻辑回归模型检验 TRIFECTA 的成就。其次,使用多变量泊松回归模型评估与更长 OT 相关的变量。最后,Kaplan-Meier 图描述了随着时间推移的 LRR。结果 在 531 例 SRM 患者中,373 例/531 例(70.2%)接受了 MWA 治疗,158 例/531 例(29.8%)接受了 RFA 治疗。与 RFA(114/158 [72.2%],P = 0.001)相比,MWA 的 TRIFECTA 成功率更高(314/373 [84.2%])。MWA与RFA治疗患者的完全消融率较高(348/373 [93.3%] vs 137/158 [86.7%],P = 0.001),从而导致了这些差异。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,MWA 与 RFA 相比,在 PSM 之前(赔率 [OR] 1.92,P = 0.008)和之后(OR 1.99,P = 0.023),MWA 与更高的 TRIFECTA 成效相关。最后,MWA 与 RFA 相比,中位手术时间更短(105 分钟与 115 分钟;P = 0.002)。在泊松回归分析中,MWA 预测 PSM 之前(发病率比 [IRR] 0.86,P <0.001)和之后(IRR 0.85,P <0.001)的 OT 更短。中位(四分位间)随访 24 (8-46) 个月后,17/373(4.6%)例 MWA 治疗患者和 21/158(13.3%)例 RFA 治疗患者出现局部复发(P = 0.29)。在 PSM 之前(P = 0.29)和之后(P = 0.42)的 Kaplan-Meier 图中,LRR 没有差异。结论与 RFA 相比,微波消融的 TRIFECTA 成效更高,OT 时间更短,但 LRR 没有明显差异。
{"title":"Microwave vs radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses: perioperative and oncological outcomes","authors":"Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Franco Orsi, Stefano Luzzago, Giovanni Mauri, Francesco A. Mistretta, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Chiara Vaccaro, Marco Tozzi, Daniele Maiettini, Gianluca Varano, Stefano Caramella, Paolo Della Vigna, Matteo Ferro, Guido Bonomo, Zhe Tian, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Ottavio De Cobelli, Gennaro Musi","doi":"10.1111/bju.16528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16528","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo conduct a comprehensive comparison of microwave ablation (MWA) vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA) outcomes in the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs), specifically: TRIFECTA ([i] complete ablation, [ii] absence of Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III complications, and [iii] absence of ≥30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate) achievement, operative time (OT), and local recurrence rate (LRR).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 531 patients with SRMs (clinical T1a–b) treated with MWA or RFA at a single centre (2008–2022). First, multivariable logistic regression models were used for testing TRIFECTA achievement. Second, multivariable Poisson regression models were used to evaluate variables associated with longer OT. Finally, Kaplan–Meier plots depicted LRR over time. All analyses were repeated after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsOf 531 patients with SRMs, 373/531 (70.2%) underwent MWA and 158/531 (29.8%) RFA. MWA demonstrated superior TRIFECTA achievement (314/373 [84.2%]) compared to RFA (114/158 [72.2%], <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). These differences were driven by higher rates of complete ablation in MWA‐ vs RFA‐treated patients (348/373 [93.3%] vs 137/158 [86.7%], <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models, MWA was associated with higher TRIFECTA achievement, compared to RFA, before (odds ratio [OR] 1.92, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.008) and after PSM (OR 1.99, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.023). Finally, the median OT was shorter for MWA vs RFA (105 vs 115 min; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.002). At Poisson regression analyses, MWA predicted shorter OT before (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.86, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and after PSM (IRR 0.85, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Local recurrence occurred in 17/373 (4.6%) MWA‐treated patients and 21/158 (13.3%) RFA‐treated patients (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.29) after a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 24 (8–46) months. There were no differences in the LRR in Kaplan–Meier plots before (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.29) and after PSM (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.42).ConclusionMicrowave ablation provides higher TRIFECTA achievement, and shorter OT than RFA. No significant differences were found regarding the LRR.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142236360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: quality‐of‐life outcomes of the ROBOtic‐assisted vs conventional open partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial 回复:ROBOtic 辅助与传统开放式肾部分切除术(ROBOCOP)II 试验的生活质量结果
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16532
Mithilesh Yadav, Sambit Tripathy, Kirti Singh, Swarnendu Mandal, Manoj Kumar Das, Kalandi Barik, Prasant Nayak
{"title":"Re: quality‐of‐life outcomes of the ROBOtic‐assisted vs conventional open partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial","authors":"Mithilesh Yadav, Sambit Tripathy, Kirti Singh, Swarnendu Mandal, Manoj Kumar Das, Kalandi Barik, Prasant Nayak","doi":"10.1111/bju.16532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16532","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142231510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in mutations across tumour sizes in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma 透明细胞肾细胞癌不同肿瘤大小的突变差异
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16527
Steven M. Monda, Benjamin W. Carney, Allison M. May, Shuchi Gulati, Simpa S. Salami, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Evan T. Keller, Nicolai A. Huebner, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Marc A. Dall'Era
ObjectiveTo assess the distribution of key mutations across tumour sizes in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and secondarily to examine the prognostic impact of aggressive mutations in smaller ccRCCs.Patient and MethodsThe distribution of mutations (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1 and CDKN2A loss) across tumour sizes was assessed in 1039 ccRCCs treated with nephrectomy in cohorts obtained from the Tracking Cancer Evolution (TRACERx), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Cancer Genomics of the Kidney (CAGEKID) projects. Logistic regression was used to model the presence of each mutation against size. In our secondary analysis, we assessed a subset of ccRCCs ≤7 cm for associations of key aggressive mutations (SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss) with metastasis, invasive disease and overall survival, while controlling for size. A subset of localised tumours ≤7 cm was also used to assess associations with recurrence after nephrectomy.ResultsOn logistic regression, each 1‐cm increase in tumour size was associated with aggressive mutations, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, at odds ratios (ORs) of 1.09, 1.10 and 1.19 (P < 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed between tumour size and PBRM1 (OR 1.02; P = 0.23). VHL was mildly negatively associated with a 1‐cm increase in size (OR 0.95; P = 0.01). Among tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 and CDKN2A loss were associated with metastatic disease at ORs of 3.86 and 3.84 (P < 0.05) while controlling for tumour size. CDKN2A loss was associated with worse overall survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.19 (P = 0.03). Among localised tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 was associated with worse recurrence‐free survival (HR 2.00; P = 0.03).ConclusionLarge and small ccRCCs are genomically different. Aggressive mutations, namely, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, are rarely observed in small ccRCCs and are observed more frequently in larger tumours. However, when present in tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 mutations and CDKN2A loss were still independently associated with invasive disease, metastasis, worse survival, and recurrence after resection, after controlling for size.
目的评估透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)不同大小肿瘤中关键突变的分布情况,其次研究侵袭性突变对较小ccRCC预后的影响。患者和方法在追踪癌症演变(TRACERx)、癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和肾脏癌症基因组学(CAGEKID)项目获得的队列中,对1039例接受肾切除术治疗的ccRCC进行了肿瘤大小突变(VHL、PBRM1、SETD2、BAP1和CDKN2A缺失)分布评估。我们使用逻辑回归法建立了每个突变存在与大小的模型。在二次分析中,我们对≤7厘米的ccRCC子集进行了评估,以确定关键侵袭性突变(SETD2、BAP1和CDKN2A缺失)与转移、浸润性疾病和总生存的关系,同时控制肿瘤大小。结果在逻辑回归中,肿瘤大小每增加1厘米与侵袭性突变(SETD2、BAP1和CDKN2A缺失)相关的几率比(ORs)分别为1.09、1.10和1.19(P <0.001),而肿瘤大小与PBRM1之间无明显相关性(OR 1.02; P = 0.23)。VHL与肿瘤增大1厘米呈轻度负相关(OR 0.95; P = 0.01)。在≤7厘米的肿瘤中,SETD2和CDKN2A缺失与转移性疾病相关,OR值分别为3.86和3.84(P < 0.05),同时控制肿瘤大小。CDKN2A 缺失与较差的总生存率有关,危险比 (HR) 为 2.19(P = 0.03)。在≤7厘米的局部肿瘤中,SETD2与较差的无复发生存率相关(HR 2.00;P = 0.03)。在小型ccRCC中很少观察到侵袭性突变,即SETD2、BAP1和CDKN2A缺失,而在大型肿瘤中则更常见。然而,当肿瘤≤7厘米时,SETD2突变和CDKN2A缺失仍与侵袭性疾病、转移、生存率降低和切除后复发独立相关,但已控制了肿瘤的大小。
{"title":"Differences in mutations across tumour sizes in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma","authors":"Steven M. Monda, Benjamin W. Carney, Allison M. May, Shuchi Gulati, Simpa S. Salami, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Evan T. Keller, Nicolai A. Huebner, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Marc A. Dall'Era","doi":"10.1111/bju.16527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16527","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo assess the distribution of key mutations across tumour sizes in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and secondarily to examine the prognostic impact of aggressive mutations in smaller ccRCCs.Patient and MethodsThe distribution of mutations (<jats:italic>VHL</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>PBRM1</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>BAP1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss) across tumour sizes was assessed in 1039 ccRCCs treated with nephrectomy in cohorts obtained from the Tracking Cancer Evolution (TRACERx), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Cancer Genomics of the Kidney (CAGEKID) projects. Logistic regression was used to model the presence of each mutation against size. In our secondary analysis, we assessed a subset of ccRCCs ≤7 cm for associations of key aggressive mutations (<jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>BAP1</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss) with metastasis, invasive disease and overall survival, while controlling for size. A subset of localised tumours ≤7 cm was also used to assess associations with recurrence after nephrectomy.ResultsOn logistic regression, each 1‐cm increase in tumour size was associated with aggressive mutations, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>BAP1</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss, at odds ratios (ORs) of 1.09, 1.10 and 1.19 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed between tumour size and <jats:italic>PBRM1</jats:italic> (OR 1.02; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.23). <jats:italic>VHL</jats:italic> was mildly negatively associated with a 1‐cm increase in size (OR 0.95; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.01). Among tumours ≤7 cm, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss were associated with metastatic disease at ORs of 3.86 and 3.84 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05) while controlling for tumour size. <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss was associated with worse overall survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.19 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03). Among localised tumours ≤7 cm, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic> was associated with worse recurrence‐free survival (HR 2.00; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03).ConclusionLarge and small ccRCCs are genomically different. Aggressive mutations, namely, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>BAP1</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss, are rarely observed in small ccRCCs and are observed more frequently in larger tumours. However, when present in tumours ≤7 cm, <jats:italic>SETD2</jats:italic> mutations and <jats:italic>CDKN2A</jats:italic> loss were still independently associated with invasive disease, metastasis, worse survival, and recurrence after resection, after controlling for size.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142174731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes in over 1100 patients (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group) 机器人辅助肾切除术:1100 多名患者的手术和中期肿瘤治疗效果(ROBUUST 2.0 合作小组)
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16526
Francesco Ditonno, Antonio Franco, Zhenjie Wu, Linhui Wang, Firas Abdollah, Giuseppe Simone, Andres F. Correa, Matteo Ferro, Sisto Perdonà, Daniele Amparore, Raj Bhanvadia, Stephan Brönimann, Dhruv Puri, Dinno F. Mendiola, Reuben Ben-David, Sol C. Moon, Courtney Yong, Farshad S. Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eugenio Bologna, Leslie Claire Licari, Marco Finati, Gabriele Tuderti, Emma Helstrom, Marco Tozzi, Antonio Tufano, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Chandru P. Sundaram, Reza Mehrazin, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Francesco Porpiglia, Nirmish Singla, Vitaly Margulis, Alessandro Antonelli, Hooman Djaladat, Riccardo Autorino

Objective

To analyse surgical, functional, and mid-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) in a contemporary large multi-institutional setting.

Patients and Methods

Data were retrieved from the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STtudy (ROBUUST) 2.0 database, an international, multicentre registry encompassing data of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing curative surgery between 2015 and 2022. The analysis included all consecutive patients undergoing RANU except those with missing data in predictors. Detailed surgical, pathological, and postoperative functional data were recorded and analysed. Oncological time-to-event outcomes were: recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, with a 3-year cut-off. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was built to evaluate predictors of each oncological outcome.

Results

A total of 1118 patients underwent RANU during the study period. The postoperative complications rate was 14.1%; the positive surgical margin rate was 4.7%. A postoperative median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of −13.1 (−27.5 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline was observed. The 3-year RFS was 59% and the 3-year MFS was 76%, with a 3-year OS and CSS of 76% and 88%, respectively. Significant predictors of worse oncological outcomes were bladder-cuff excision, high-grade tumour, pathological T stage ≥3, and nodal involvement.

Conclusions

The present study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the increasing adoption of RANU. The procedure consistently offers low surgical morbidity and can provide favourable mid-term oncological outcomes, mirroring those of open NU, even in non-organ-confined disease.

在当代大型多机构环境中分析机器人辅助肾切除术(RANU)的手术、功能和中期肿瘤治疗效果。
{"title":"Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes in over 1100 patients (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group)","authors":"Francesco Ditonno,&nbsp;Antonio Franco,&nbsp;Zhenjie Wu,&nbsp;Linhui Wang,&nbsp;Firas Abdollah,&nbsp;Giuseppe Simone,&nbsp;Andres F. Correa,&nbsp;Matteo Ferro,&nbsp;Sisto Perdonà,&nbsp;Daniele Amparore,&nbsp;Raj Bhanvadia,&nbsp;Stephan Brönimann,&nbsp;Dhruv Puri,&nbsp;Dinno F. Mendiola,&nbsp;Reuben Ben-David,&nbsp;Sol C. Moon,&nbsp;Courtney Yong,&nbsp;Farshad S. Moghaddam,&nbsp;Alireza Ghoreifi,&nbsp;Eugenio Bologna,&nbsp;Leslie Claire Licari,&nbsp;Marco Finati,&nbsp;Gabriele Tuderti,&nbsp;Emma Helstrom,&nbsp;Marco Tozzi,&nbsp;Antonio Tufano,&nbsp;Soroush Rais-Bahrami,&nbsp;Chandru P. Sundaram,&nbsp;Reza Mehrazin,&nbsp;Mark L. Gonzalgo,&nbsp;Ithaar H. Derweesh,&nbsp;Francesco Porpiglia,&nbsp;Nirmish Singla,&nbsp;Vitaly Margulis,&nbsp;Alessandro Antonelli,&nbsp;Hooman Djaladat,&nbsp;Riccardo Autorino","doi":"10.1111/bju.16526","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bju.16526","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To analyse surgical, functional, and mid-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) in a contemporary large multi-institutional setting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data were retrieved from the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STtudy (ROBUUST) 2.0 database, an international, multicentre registry encompassing data of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing curative surgery between 2015 and 2022. The analysis included all consecutive patients undergoing RANU except those with missing data in predictors. Detailed surgical, pathological, and postoperative functional data were recorded and analysed. Oncological time-to-event outcomes were: recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, with a 3-year cut-off. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was built to evaluate predictors of each oncological outcome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 1118 patients underwent RANU during the study period. The postoperative complications rate was 14.1%; the positive surgical margin rate was 4.7%. A postoperative median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of −13.1 (−27.5 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> from baseline was observed. The 3-year RFS was 59% and the 3-year MFS was 76%, with a 3-year OS and CSS of 76% and 88%, respectively. Significant predictors of worse oncological outcomes were bladder-cuff excision, high-grade tumour, pathological T stage ≥3, and nodal involvement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the increasing adoption of RANU. The procedure consistently offers low surgical morbidity and can provide favourable mid-term oncological outcomes, mirroring those of open NU, even in non-organ-confined disease.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"134 6","pages":"967-975"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bju.16526","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A decade long insight into patient views on kidney cancer care delivery 长达十年的肾癌患者对肾癌护理服务看法的深入研究
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16530
Sabrina H. Rossi, Geraldine Fox, Malcolm Packer, Andrew Greaves, Maxine Tran, Natalie Charnley, Grenville Oades, Ekaterini Boleti, Grant D. Stewart
<p>Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is crucial to ensure that patient care and research is relevant to patient needs and is more likely to have a positive impact. Indeed, previous research priority setting initiatives in kidney cancer, which have led to tangible research programmes, have actively involved patients and their carers [<span>1</span>]. A continued focus on the patients and the public perspective of kidney cancer diagnosis and treatment is imperative. Kidney Cancer UK, a UK kidney cancer charity, carried out a survey of patients with kidney cancer annually over the last decade. Here, we report longitudinal survey results and reflect on the future direction of kidney cancer care and how they link to research priorities in the UK.</p><p>Kidney Cancer UK delivered an annual patient survey, distributed on-line via the QuestionPro platform and via post, between 2014 and 2023. This was publicised via social media platforms (including the charity's website, Facebook, Instagram and X). Additionally, the survey was sent to clinicians and cancer nurse specialists for distribution to patients. The questionnaire focused on the patients’ experience on diagnosis, treatment and information/support received. Survey participation increased over time, with 68 completed in 2013, >300 participants from 2019 onwards and >500 participants in 2022 and 2023.</p><p>A consistent survey finding was that patients feel the pathway to diagnosis for kidney cancer could be improved. Interestingly, the proportion of respondents waiting >3 months for a specialist kidney cancer diagnosis underwent a sharp rise in 2020, increasing from around 11–18% in the preceding years to 33%, with levels remaining stable since then (Fig. 1). This may be partly related to delays in diagnosis following the coronavirus pandemic, however, there was no improvement in subsequent years, perhaps reflecting growing NHS pressures. NHS data suggest an increased backlog with growing waiting times to see a specialist in secondary care and increased waiting lists for treatment [<span>2</span>]. Timely diagnosis remains a key area for improvement and is a target for NHS England. One in four patients reported that their GP initially misdiagnosed their symptoms as an alternative condition, and they felt that this delayed their diagnosis. This proportion has remained static over the last 4 years (Fig. 1). Indeed, kidney cancer is often asymptomatic or results in non-specific symptoms. Only 19% of survey participants reported haematuria. This is in keeping with UK data demonstrating that only 23% of patients diagnosed with renal cancer report visible haematuria, and this is more commonly associated with advanced tumour stage (49% having Stage III–IV disease) [<span>3</span>]. Although increased public awareness of kidney cancer symptoms has been successfully achieved through public health ‘Blood in the Pee’ Campaigns in England, this was associated with increased early-s
虽然有 5%的参与者表示他们在 2014 年获得了临床试验机会,但这一比例在过去十年中基本保持不变,到 2023 年只有 13% 的参与者获得了临床试验机会(图 1)。这是一个需要重点改进的关键领域。此外,消融疗法的使用也没有增加,10 年间有 6% 的患者报告接受过消融疗法(图 1)。这些数据与英国肾癌协会(Kidney Cancer UK)对英格兰肾癌服务质量绩效审计(Quality Performance Audit)的结果一致,其中只有 3% 的 T1 肿瘤接受了消融治疗[6]。事实上,改进肾脏小肿块的特征描述、诊断和管理已被确定为研究重点[1]。2023 年,37% 的患者表示他们对诊断的沟通方式不满意。这一比例在过去十年中基本保持不变(图 1)。同样,41%-53% 的患者认为他们在诊断时没有得到足够的信息,这一比例在过去十年中也保持不变。例如,在 2023 年,43% 的参与者表示在诊断时没有得到信息传单(图 1)。获得指定关键工作者或癌症专科护士详细信息的患者比例普遍下降,从 2014 年的 40% 降至 2023 年的 21%。提供患者信息传单、获得指定的关键工作者和良好的沟通都是英国肾癌护理的主要审核目标。独立的患者调查也反映出英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中沟通不良的问题[7],据推测,这可能是医疗系统压力日益增大的次要原因。一项关于英国国家医疗服务体系投诉的研究表明,近一半(48%)的投诉与沟通不畅有关[8]。总之,这些纵向调查数据凸显了改善肾癌患者早期检测和诊断途径、加强患者沟通和支持以及更公平地获得治疗方案的必要性(图 1)。这些数据并非审计和临床研究的常规数据,这凸显了 PPIE 的重要性。我们承认该调查存在一些局限性,即受访者是自行选择的患者群体,人口统计学特征(包括诊断时的分期)不详。尽管如此,10 年纵向数据的获取凸显了随着时间推移的趋势,包括大流行病对患者护理的潜在影响,这也是这项工作的优势所在。
{"title":"A decade long insight into patient views on kidney cancer care delivery","authors":"Sabrina H. Rossi, Geraldine Fox, Malcolm Packer, Andrew Greaves, Maxine Tran, Natalie Charnley, Grenville Oades, Ekaterini Boleti, Grant D. Stewart","doi":"10.1111/bju.16530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16530","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is crucial to ensure that patient care and research is relevant to patient needs and is more likely to have a positive impact. Indeed, previous research priority setting initiatives in kidney cancer, which have led to tangible research programmes, have actively involved patients and their carers [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. A continued focus on the patients and the public perspective of kidney cancer diagnosis and treatment is imperative. Kidney Cancer UK, a UK kidney cancer charity, carried out a survey of patients with kidney cancer annually over the last decade. Here, we report longitudinal survey results and reflect on the future direction of kidney cancer care and how they link to research priorities in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Kidney Cancer UK delivered an annual patient survey, distributed on-line via the QuestionPro platform and via post, between 2014 and 2023. This was publicised via social media platforms (including the charity's website, Facebook, Instagram and X). Additionally, the survey was sent to clinicians and cancer nurse specialists for distribution to patients. The questionnaire focused on the patients’ experience on diagnosis, treatment and information/support received. Survey participation increased over time, with 68 completed in 2013, &gt;300 participants from 2019 onwards and &gt;500 participants in 2022 and 2023.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;A consistent survey finding was that patients feel the pathway to diagnosis for kidney cancer could be improved. Interestingly, the proportion of respondents waiting &gt;3 months for a specialist kidney cancer diagnosis underwent a sharp rise in 2020, increasing from around 11–18% in the preceding years to 33%, with levels remaining stable since then (Fig. 1). This may be partly related to delays in diagnosis following the coronavirus pandemic, however, there was no improvement in subsequent years, perhaps reflecting growing NHS pressures. NHS data suggest an increased backlog with growing waiting times to see a specialist in secondary care and increased waiting lists for treatment [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Timely diagnosis remains a key area for improvement and is a target for NHS England. One in four patients reported that their GP initially misdiagnosed their symptoms as an alternative condition, and they felt that this delayed their diagnosis. This proportion has remained static over the last 4 years (Fig. 1). Indeed, kidney cancer is often asymptomatic or results in non-specific symptoms. Only 19% of survey participants reported haematuria. This is in keeping with UK data demonstrating that only 23% of patients diagnosed with renal cancer report visible haematuria, and this is more commonly associated with advanced tumour stage (49% having Stage III–IV disease) [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Although increased public awareness of kidney cancer symptoms has been successfully achieved through public health ‘Blood in the Pee’ Campaigns in England, this was associated with increased early-s","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 根治性膀胱切除术前的心肺运动测试:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16476
Allen Ao Guo, Kieran Zeng, Ymer Bushati, Paul Kim, Wenjie Zhong, Venu Chalasani, Matthew Winter
To identify the association between cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC), as RC is historically associated with high rates of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality.
目的:确定心肺运动测试(CPET)与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)结果之间的关系,因为根治性膀胱切除术历来与短期和长期的高发病率和死亡率有关。
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Allen Ao Guo, Kieran Zeng, Ymer Bushati, Paul Kim, Wenjie Zhong, Venu Chalasani, Matthew Winter","doi":"10.1111/bju.16476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16476","url":null,"abstract":"To identify the association between cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC), as RC is historically associated with high rates of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142166242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy from primary tumour characteristics 根据原发肿瘤特征预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16482
Matthew J. Roberts, Nathan Papa, Hans Veerman, Katelijne de Bie, Andrew Morton, Anthony Franklin, Sheliyan Raveenthiran, William J. Yaxley, Maarten L. Donswijk, Henk G. van der Poel, Hemamali Samaratunga, David Wong, Nicholas Brown, Robert Parkinson, Troy Gianduzzo, Boon Kua, Geoffrey D. Coughlin, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Louise Emmett, Pim J. van Leeuwen, John W. Yaxley, André N. Vis
To construct and externally calibrate a predictive model for early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) incorporating clinical and modern imaging characteristics of the primary tumour.
结合原发肿瘤的临床和现代成像特征,构建并从外部校准根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后早期生化复发(BCR)的预测模型。
{"title":"Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy from primary tumour characteristics","authors":"Matthew J. Roberts, Nathan Papa, Hans Veerman, Katelijne de Bie, Andrew Morton, Anthony Franklin, Sheliyan Raveenthiran, William J. Yaxley, Maarten L. Donswijk, Henk G. van der Poel, Hemamali Samaratunga, David Wong, Nicholas Brown, Robert Parkinson, Troy Gianduzzo, Boon Kua, Geoffrey D. Coughlin, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Louise Emmett, Pim J. van Leeuwen, John W. Yaxley, André N. Vis","doi":"10.1111/bju.16482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16482","url":null,"abstract":"To construct and externally calibrate a predictive model for early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) incorporating clinical and modern imaging characteristics of the primary tumour.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJU International
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1