首页 > 最新文献

BJU International最新文献

英文 中文
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program audit of contemporary perioperative care for radical cystectomy. 国家外科质量改进计划对根治性膀胱切除术的当代围手术期护理进行审核。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16492
John Pfail, Jasmin Capellan, Rachel Passarelli, Alain Kaldany, Kevin Chua, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Arnav Srivastava, David Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Henry A Pitt, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour

Objective: To examine the impact of increased compliance to contemporary perioperative care measures, as outlined by enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, among patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

Patients and methods: From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database we captured patients undergoing RC between 2019 and 2021. We identified five perioperative care measures: regional anaesthesia block, thromboembolism prophylaxis, ≤24 h perioperative antibiotic administration, absence of bowel preparation, and early oral diet. We stratified patients by the number of measures utilised (one to five). Statistical endpoints included 30-day complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and optimal RC outcome. Optimal RC outcome was defined as absence of any postoperative complication, re-operation, prolonged LOS (75th percentile, 8 days) with no readmission. Multivariable regressions with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess the association between use of contemporary perioperative care measures and outcomes.

Results: Of the 3702 patients who underwent RC, 73 (2%), 417 (11%), 1010 (27%), 1454 (39%), and 748 (20%) received one, two, three, four, and five interventions, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increased perioperative care measures were associated with lower odds of any complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.73), and shorter LOS (β -0.82, 99% CI -0.99 to -0.65). Furthermore, patients with increased compliance to contemporary care measures had increased odds of an optimal outcome (OR 1.38, 99% CI 1.26-1.51).

Conclusions: Among the measures we assessed, greater adherence yielded improved postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing RC. Our work supports the efficacy of ERAS protocols in reducing the morbidity associated with RC.

目的研究在接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的患者中加强遵守术后恢复(ERAS)指南所概述的现代围手术期护理措施的影响:我们从国家外科质量改进计划数据库中收集了 2019 年至 2021 年期间接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者。我们确定了五项围手术期护理措施:区域麻醉阻滞、血栓栓塞预防、围手术期抗生素用药≤24 h、无肠道准备和早期口服饮食。我们根据采用措施的数量(1 至 5 项)对患者进行了分层。统计终点包括 30 天并发症、住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和最佳 RC 结果。最佳 RC 结果定义为无任何术后并发症、再次手术、住院时间延长(第 75 百分位数,8 天)且无再次入院。采用Bonferroni校正进行多变量回归,以评估现代围手术期护理措施的使用与结果之间的关联:在接受 RC 的 3702 名患者中,分别有 73 人(2%)、417 人(11%)、1010 人(27%)、1454 人(39%)和 748 人(20%)接受了一项、两项、三项、四项和五项干预措施。通过多变量分析,围手术期护理措施的增加与任何并发症的发生几率降低(几率比 [OR] 0.66,99% 置信区间 [CI] 0.6-0.73)和 LOS 缩短(β -0.82,99% CI -0.99--0.65)有关。此外,患者对现代护理措施的依从性越高,获得最佳结果的几率就越大(OR 1.38,99% CI 1.26-1.51):结论:在我们评估的措施中,更严格遵守这些措施可改善接受 RC 患者的术后效果。我们的研究支持 ERAS 方案在降低 RC 相关发病率方面的功效。
{"title":"National Surgical Quality Improvement Program audit of contemporary perioperative care for radical cystectomy.","authors":"John Pfail, Jasmin Capellan, Rachel Passarelli, Alain Kaldany, Kevin Chua, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Arnav Srivastava, David Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Henry A Pitt, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour","doi":"10.1111/bju.16492","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bju.16492","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of increased compliance to contemporary perioperative care measures, as outlined by enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, among patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database we captured patients undergoing RC between 2019 and 2021. We identified five perioperative care measures: regional anaesthesia block, thromboembolism prophylaxis, ≤24 h perioperative antibiotic administration, absence of bowel preparation, and early oral diet. We stratified patients by the number of measures utilised (one to five). Statistical endpoints included 30-day complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and optimal RC outcome. Optimal RC outcome was defined as absence of any postoperative complication, re-operation, prolonged LOS (75th percentile, 8 days) with no readmission. Multivariable regressions with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess the association between use of contemporary perioperative care measures and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3702 patients who underwent RC, 73 (2%), 417 (11%), 1010 (27%), 1454 (39%), and 748 (20%) received one, two, three, four, and five interventions, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increased perioperative care measures were associated with lower odds of any complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.73), and shorter LOS (β -0.82, 99% CI -0.99 to -0.65). Furthermore, patients with increased compliance to contemporary care measures had increased odds of an optimal outcome (OR 1.38, 99% CI 1.26-1.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the measures we assessed, greater adherence yielded improved postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing RC. Our work supports the efficacy of ERAS protocols in reducing the morbidity associated with RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628928/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141858970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TYTOCARE™ home telemonitoring device after radical cystectomy to optimise postoperative outcomes TYTOCARE™家庭远程监测设备在根治性膀胱切除术后优化术后结果
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16637
Daniele Amparore, Sabrina De Cillis, Marco Colombo, Valentina Garzena, Michele Sica, Enrico Checcucci, Alberto Piana, Federico Piramide, Alberto Quarà, Matteo Manfredi, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia
ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine programme for home telemonitoring during the early postoperative period following radical cystectomy (RC) in a prospective single‐centre study.Materials and MethodsThe study included patients aged <80 years with internet access who underwent RC at our institution between March 2021 and August 2023. Upon discharge, patients were monitored at home using the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine system. Daily, patients completed a symptom questionnaire and recorded heart rate, body temperature, intestinal sounds, and urine output, and wound/ostomy evaluations via photos. Weekly televisits via the TYTOCARETM platform and app were scheduled, with additional controls as needed. After 30 days, patients assessed their satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100) and a Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; 1–5) and any technical issues were documented. A control group of patients, who underwent RC in the same study period but who did not take part in a postoperative telemonitoring programme, was chosen for comparison, with analysis of demographics, peri‐operative data, postoperative complications and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge.ResultsA total of 16 patients were included in the TYTOCARETM group, and 88 in the control group. The mean VAS satisfaction scores were 86.4 (patients) and 92.3 (healthcare providers). The mean TSQ score was 4.3, indicating high satisfaction. All TYTOCARETM patients reported they would use and recommend the device. Two patients encountered minor technical issues, which were easily resolved. The TYTOCARETM group had a shorter hospital stay (11 vs 14 days; P = 0.04) and fewer medical complications ( 2/16 vs 21/88; P = 0.02). No TYTOCARETM patients were readmitted within 30 days, compared to 20.4% in the control group.ConclusionThe TYTOCARETM telemonitoring programme seems to be feasible and highly adhered to by patients and caregivers, with reductions in length of hospital stay, medical complications and hospital readmissions within the first 30 days post‐discharge.
目的:在一项前瞻性单中心研究中,评估TYTOCARE™远程医疗项目在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)术后早期家庭远程监测中的作用。材料和方法该研究纳入了2021年3月至2023年8月期间在我们机构接受RC的80岁可上网患者。出院后,患者在家中使用TYTOCARE™远程医疗系统进行监测。患者每天完成一份症状问卷,记录心率、体温、肠音、尿量,并通过照片对伤口/造口进行评估。通过TYTOCARETM平台和应用程序安排每周的电视节目,并根据需要进行额外的控制。30天后,患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS;0-100)和远程医疗满意度问卷(TSQ;1-5)和任何技术问题都被记录下来。选择在同一研究期间接受RC但未参加术后远程监测计划的对照组进行比较,分析人口统计学、围手术期数据、术后并发症和出院后30天内的再入院情况。结果TYTOCARETM治疗组16例,对照组88例。VAS满意度平均分为86.4分(患者)和92.3分(医护人员)。TSQ平均得分为4.3分,满意度较高。所有TYTOCARETM患者都表示他们会使用并推荐该设备。两名患者遇到了一些小的技术问题,这些问题很容易解决。TYTOCARETM组住院时间较短(11天vs 14天;P = 0.04)和更少的医疗并发症(2/16 vs 21/88;P = 0.02)。30天内没有TYTOCARETM患者再次入院,而对照组为20.4%。结论TYTOCARETM远程监护方案似乎是可行的,并且患者和护理人员高度遵守,减少了住院时间、医疗并发症和出院后30天内的再入院率。
{"title":"TYTOCARE™ home telemonitoring device after radical cystectomy to optimise postoperative outcomes","authors":"Daniele Amparore, Sabrina De Cillis, Marco Colombo, Valentina Garzena, Michele Sica, Enrico Checcucci, Alberto Piana, Federico Piramide, Alberto Quarà, Matteo Manfredi, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia","doi":"10.1111/bju.16637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16637","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine programme for home telemonitoring during the early postoperative period following radical cystectomy (RC) in a prospective single‐centre study.Materials and MethodsThe study included patients aged &lt;80 years with internet access who underwent RC at our institution between March 2021 and August 2023. Upon discharge, patients were monitored at home using the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine system. Daily, patients completed a symptom questionnaire and recorded heart rate, body temperature, intestinal sounds, and urine output, and wound/ostomy evaluations via photos. Weekly televisits via the TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> platform and app were scheduled, with additional controls as needed. After 30 days, patients assessed their satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100) and a Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; 1–5) and any technical issues were documented. A control group of patients, who underwent RC in the same study period but who did not take part in a postoperative telemonitoring programme, was chosen for comparison, with analysis of demographics, peri‐operative data, postoperative complications and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge.ResultsA total of 16 patients were included in the TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> group, and 88 in the control group. The mean VAS satisfaction scores were 86.4 (patients) and 92.3 (healthcare providers). The mean TSQ score was 4.3, indicating high satisfaction. All TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> patients reported they would use and recommend the device. Two patients encountered minor technical issues, which were easily resolved. The TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> group had a shorter hospital stay (11 vs 14 days; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.04) and fewer medical complications ( 2/16 vs 21/88; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.02). No TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> patients were readmitted within 30 days, compared to 20.4% in the control group.ConclusionThe TYTOCARE<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup> telemonitoring programme seems to be feasible and highly adhered to by patients and caregivers, with reductions in length of hospital stay, medical complications and hospital readmissions within the first 30 days post‐discharge.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142888104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group” 对“我们如何降低机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术合并体内新膀胱后的发病率?”欧洲泌尿外科协会机器人泌尿科科学工作组关于术后并发症的报告
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16619
<p>Pellegrino F., Martini A., Falagario U.G. et al. How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group, BJU Int. 2024 Jun;133(6):673–677. doi: 10.1111/bju.16283</p><p>The author affiliations published in the June 2024 issue were incorrect. Additionally, the surname of one coauthor was misspelled. The correct author affiliations and surnames appear below:</p><p>Francesco Pellegrino<sup>1,3,7</sup>, Alberto Martini<sup>9</sup>, Ugo Giovanni Falagario<sup>4,8</sup>, Juhana Rautiola<sup>7</sup>, Antonio Russo<sup>2,10</sup>, Laura S Mertens<sup>11</sup>, Luca Di Gianfrancesco<sup>6</sup>, Carlo Andrea Bravi <sup>14,15,18</sup>, Jonathan Vollemaere<sup>20</sup>, Muhammad Abdeen<sup>20</sup>, Marco Moschini<sup>1,3</sup>, Mikolaj Mendrek<sup>21</sup>, Eirik Kjøbli<sup>24</sup>, Stephan Buse<sup>22</sup>, Carl Wijburg<sup>13</sup>, Alae Touzani<sup>9,25</sup>, Guillaume Ploussard<sup>9</sup>, Alessandro Antonelli<sup>5</sup>, Laura Schwenk<sup>26</sup>, Jan Ebbing<sup>26</sup>, Nikhil Vasdev<sup>19</sup>, Gabriel Froelicher<sup>27</sup>, Hubert John<sup>27</sup>, Abdullah Erdem Canda<sup>28,29</sup>, Mevlana Derya Balbay<sup>28,30</sup>, Marcel Stoll<sup>23</sup>, Sebastian Edeling<sup>23</sup>, Camille Berquin<sup>16</sup>, Charles Van Praet<sup>16</sup>, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah<sup>21</sup>, Stefan Siemer<sup>20</sup>, Michael Stoeckle<sup>20</sup>, Alexander Mottrie<sup>14,15</sup>, Frederiek D'Hondt<sup>14,15</sup>, Alessandro Crestani<sup>6</sup>, Angelo Porreca<sup>6</sup>, Alberto Briganti<sup>1,3</sup>, Francesco Montorsi<sup>1,3</sup>, Hendrik van der Poel<sup>11,12</sup>, Karel Decaestecker<sup>17,16,32</sup>, Richard Gaston<sup>10</sup>, Abolfazl Hosseini<sup>7</sup>, N Peter Wiklund<sup>8,31</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup>Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; <sup>2</sup>Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; <sup>3</sup>Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; <sup>4</sup>Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; <sup>5</sup>Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; <sup>6</sup>Oncological Urology, IRCCS Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy; <sup>7</sup>Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; <sup>8</sup>Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden; <sup>9</sup>Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; <sup>10</sup>Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France; <sup>11</sup>Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; <sup>12</sup>Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; <sup>13</sup>Department of Urolog
佩莱格里诺F,马提尼A,法拉格里奥U.G.等。如何降低机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术伴体内新膀胱的发病率?欧洲泌尿外科协会机器人泌尿外科科学工作组关于术后并发症的报告,BJU国际医学杂志,2024年6月;133(6):673-677。doi: 10.1111 /北大。16283 2024年6月刊上发表的作者归属不正确。此外,一位合著者的姓氏也拼错了。正确的作者关系和姓氏如下:Francesco pellegrino 1,3,7、Alberto Martini9、Ugo Giovanni falagario4,8、Juhana Rautiola7、Antonio russo2,10、Laura S Mertens11、Luca Di Gianfrancesco6、Carlo Andrea Bravi 14,15,18、Jonathan Vollemaere20、Muhammad Abdeen20、Marco moschini1,3、Mikolaj Mendrek21、Eirik kj约bli24、Stephan Buse22、Carl Wijburg13、Alae touzani9,25、Guillaume Ploussard9、Alessandro Antonelli5、Laura Schwenk26、Jan Ebbing26、Nikhil Vasdev19、Gabriel Froelicher27、Hubert John27, Abdullah Erdem canda28,29, Mevlana Derya balbay28,30, Marcel Stoll23, Sebastian Edeling23, Camille Berquin16, Charles Van Praet16, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah21, Stefan Siemer20, Michael Stoeckle20, Alexander mottrie14,15, Frederiek D' hondt14,15, Alessandro Crestani6, Angelo Porreca6, Alberto briganti1,3, Francesco montorsi1,3, Hendrik Van der poel11,12, Karel decaestecker17,16,32, Richard Gaston10, Abolfazl Hosseini7, N Peter wiklund8,31意大利米兰圣拉斐尔科学研究所;2意大利米兰圣拉斐尔医院泌尿外科;3意大利米兰圣拉斐尔大学vita - salute;4意大利福贾大学泌尿外科与器官移植科,福贾;5意大利维罗纳大学泌尿外科;6意大利帕多瓦,IRCCS威尼托肿瘤研究所泌尿肿瘤科;7瑞典索尔纳,卡罗林斯卡大学附属医院泌尿外科;8瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡医学院分子医学与外科学系;9法国Quint Fonsegrives La Croix du Sud医院泌尿科;10法国波尔多圣奥古斯丁诊所泌尿科;11荷兰癌症研究所泌尿外科,荷兰阿姆斯特丹;12阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心泌尿外科,荷兰阿姆斯特丹;13荷兰阿纳姆Rijnstate医院泌尿科;14比利时阿尔斯特OLV医院泌尿外科;15奥尔西学院,根特,比利时;16根特大学医院泌尿外科,比利时根特;17比利时根特Maria Middelares医院泌尿外科;18英国伦敦皇家马斯登NHS基金会泌尿科;19英国斯蒂夫尼奇利斯特医院赫特福德郡和贝德福德郡泌尿肿瘤中心泌尿科;20萨尔大学泌尿外科和儿科泌尿外科,德国洪堡/萨尔;21德国格罗瑙圣安东尼奥医院泌尿外科、泌尿肿瘤与机器人辅助外科;22德国埃森Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus泌尿外科;23德国汉诺威Vinzenz医院泌尿外科;24特隆赫姆大学附属医院St. Olavs医院泌尿科,挪威特隆赫姆;25摩洛哥卡萨布兰卡国际肿瘤中心泌尿外科;26瑞士巴塞尔大学医院泌尿外科;27瑞士温特图尔温特图尔州立医院泌尿科;28土耳其伊斯坦布尔科ßc大学医学院泌尿外科;29RMK AIMES (Rahmi M. Koßc介入医学、教育和模拟学院),土耳其伊斯坦布尔;30土耳其伊斯坦布尔美国医院泌尿外科;31西奈山伊坎医学院泌尿外科,纽约,美国;32根特大学医学院人体结构与修复系,比利时根特我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bju.16619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16619","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Pellegrino F., Martini A., Falagario U.G. et al. How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group, BJU Int. 2024 Jun;133(6):673–677. doi: 10.1111/bju.16283&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;The author affiliations published in the June 2024 issue were incorrect. Additionally, the surname of one coauthor was misspelled. The correct author affiliations and surnames appear below:&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Francesco Pellegrino&lt;sup&gt;1,3,7&lt;/sup&gt;, Alberto Martini&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;, Ugo Giovanni Falagario&lt;sup&gt;4,8&lt;/sup&gt;, Juhana Rautiola&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;, Antonio Russo&lt;sup&gt;2,10&lt;/sup&gt;, Laura S Mertens&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;, Luca Di Gianfrancesco&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;, Carlo Andrea Bravi &lt;sup&gt;14,15,18&lt;/sup&gt;, Jonathan Vollemaere&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;, Muhammad Abdeen&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;, Marco Moschini&lt;sup&gt;1,3&lt;/sup&gt;, Mikolaj Mendrek&lt;sup&gt;21&lt;/sup&gt;, Eirik Kjøbli&lt;sup&gt;24&lt;/sup&gt;, Stephan Buse&lt;sup&gt;22&lt;/sup&gt;, Carl Wijburg&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;, Alae Touzani&lt;sup&gt;9,25&lt;/sup&gt;, Guillaume Ploussard&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;, Alessandro Antonelli&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;, Laura Schwenk&lt;sup&gt;26&lt;/sup&gt;, Jan Ebbing&lt;sup&gt;26&lt;/sup&gt;, Nikhil Vasdev&lt;sup&gt;19&lt;/sup&gt;, Gabriel Froelicher&lt;sup&gt;27&lt;/sup&gt;, Hubert John&lt;sup&gt;27&lt;/sup&gt;, Abdullah Erdem Canda&lt;sup&gt;28,29&lt;/sup&gt;, Mevlana Derya Balbay&lt;sup&gt;28,30&lt;/sup&gt;, Marcel Stoll&lt;sup&gt;23&lt;/sup&gt;, Sebastian Edeling&lt;sup&gt;23&lt;/sup&gt;, Camille Berquin&lt;sup&gt;16&lt;/sup&gt;, Charles Van Praet&lt;sup&gt;16&lt;/sup&gt;, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah&lt;sup&gt;21&lt;/sup&gt;, Stefan Siemer&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;, Michael Stoeckle&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;, Alexander Mottrie&lt;sup&gt;14,15&lt;/sup&gt;, Frederiek D'Hondt&lt;sup&gt;14,15&lt;/sup&gt;, Alessandro Crestani&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;, Angelo Porreca&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;, Alberto Briganti&lt;sup&gt;1,3&lt;/sup&gt;, Francesco Montorsi&lt;sup&gt;1,3&lt;/sup&gt;, Hendrik van der Poel&lt;sup&gt;11,12&lt;/sup&gt;, Karel Decaestecker&lt;sup&gt;17,16,32&lt;/sup&gt;, Richard Gaston&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;, Abolfazl Hosseini&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;, N Peter Wiklund&lt;sup&gt;8,31&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;Oncological Urology, IRCCS Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy; &lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; &lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden; &lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; &lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France; &lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; &lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;Department of Urolog","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142887228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inhibition of phosphodiesterases 1 and 4 prevents myofibroblast transformation in Peyronie's disease 抑制磷酸二酯酶1和4可防止Peyronie病的肌成纤维细胞转化
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16631
Sophie L. Harding, Marcus M. Ilg, Stephen A. Bustin, David J. Ralph, Selim Cellek
To investigate which phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoforms are expressed in fibroblasts isolated from the tunica albuginea (TA) of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD), and to measure the potency of PDE inhibitors in preventing transformation of these fibroblasts to profibrotic myofibroblasts.
研究从佩氏病(PD)患者的白膜(TA)分离的成纤维细胞中表达哪些磷酸二酯酶(PDE)亚型,并测量PDE抑制剂在阻止这些成纤维细胞向纤维化肌成纤维细胞转化方面的效力。
{"title":"Inhibition of phosphodiesterases 1 and 4 prevents myofibroblast transformation in Peyronie's disease","authors":"Sophie L. Harding, Marcus M. Ilg, Stephen A. Bustin, David J. Ralph, Selim Cellek","doi":"10.1111/bju.16631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16631","url":null,"abstract":"To investigate which phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoforms are expressed in fibroblasts isolated from the tunica albuginea (TA) of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD), and to measure the potency of PDE inhibitors in preventing transformation of these fibroblasts to profibrotic myofibroblasts.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External validation of predictive models for antibiotic susceptibility of urine culture 尿培养抗生素敏感性预测模型的外部验证
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16626
Glenn T. Werneburg, Daniel D. Rhoads, Alex Milinovich, Sean McSweeney, Jacob Knorr, Lyla Mourany, Alex Zajichek, Howard B. Goldman, Georges‐Pascal Haber, Sandip P. Vasavada
ObjectiveTo develop, externally validate, and test a series of computer algorithms to accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results at the time of clinical diagnosis, up to 3 days before standard urine culture results become available, with the goal of improving antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsMachine learning algorithms were developed and trained to predict susceptibility or resistance using over 4.7 million discrete AST classifications from urine cultures in a cohort of adult patients from outpatient and inpatient settings from 2012 to 2022. The algorithms were validated on a cohort from a geographically‐distant hospital system, ~1931 km (~1200 miles) from the training cohort facilities, from the same time period. Finally, algorithms were clinically validated in a contemporary cohort and compared to the empiric therapy prescribed by clinicians. Appropriateness of the antibiotics selected by clinicians and the algorithm during the clinical validation was compared.ResultsAlgorithms were accurate during clinical validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.71–0.94) for all 11 tested antibiotics. The algorithms’ accuracy improved as the organism was identified (AUC 0.79–0.97). In external validation in a geographically‐distant cohort, the algorithms remained accurate even without additional training on this group (AUC 0.69–0.87). When the algorithms were trained on the antibiogram from the geographically‐distant hospital, the accuracy improved (AUC 0.70–0.93). When algorithms’ performances were tested against clinicians in a contemporary cohort for the empiric prescription of oral antibiotics, the drug agent suggested by the algorithms more frequently resulted in adequate empiric coverage.ConclusionsMachine learning algorithms trained on a large dataset are accurate in prediction of urine culture susceptibility vs resistance up to 3 days prior to urine AST availability. Clinical implementation of such an algorithm could improve both clinical care and antimicrobial stewardship.
目的开发、外部验证和测试一系列计算机算法,以便在临床诊断时准确预测抗生素敏感性试验(AST)结果,最多可在标准尿培养结果公布前3天,以改善抗生素管理和患者预后。研究人员开发并训练了机器学习算法,利用2012年至2022年门诊和住院成年患者尿液培养的470多万个离散AST分类来预测易感性或耐药性。该算法在同一时间段内,在距离培训队列设施约1931公里(约1200英里)的地理位置较远的医院系统的队列中进行验证。最后,在当代队列中对算法进行了临床验证,并与临床医生开出的经验疗法进行了比较。比较临床验证时临床医生选择的抗生素与算法的适宜性。结果对11种抗生素进行临床验证时,算法均准确(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] 0.71 ~ 0.94)。随着生物的识别,算法的准确性得到提高(AUC为0.79-0.97)。在地理位置较远的队列的外部验证中,即使没有对该组进行额外的训练,算法仍然准确(AUC为0.69-0.87)。当算法在地理位置较远的医院的抗生素谱上进行训练时,准确性得到提高(AUC为0.70-0.93)。当算法的性能与临床医生在当代队列中对口服抗生素的经验性处方进行测试时,算法建议的药物更频繁地导致足够的经验覆盖。结论在大数据集上训练的机器学习算法在尿AST可用前3天预测尿培养敏感性和耐药性方面是准确的。这种算法的临床实施可以改善临床护理和抗菌药物管理。
{"title":"External validation of predictive models for antibiotic susceptibility of urine culture","authors":"Glenn T. Werneburg, Daniel D. Rhoads, Alex Milinovich, Sean McSweeney, Jacob Knorr, Lyla Mourany, Alex Zajichek, Howard B. Goldman, Georges‐Pascal Haber, Sandip P. Vasavada","doi":"10.1111/bju.16626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16626","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo develop, externally validate, and test a series of computer algorithms to accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results at the time of clinical diagnosis, up to 3 days before standard urine culture results become available, with the goal of improving antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsMachine learning algorithms were developed and trained to predict susceptibility or resistance using over 4.7 million discrete AST classifications from urine cultures in a cohort of adult patients from outpatient and inpatient settings from 2012 to 2022. The algorithms were validated on a cohort from a geographically‐distant hospital system, ~1931 km (~1200 miles) from the training cohort facilities, from the same time period. Finally, algorithms were clinically validated in a contemporary cohort and compared to the empiric therapy prescribed by clinicians. Appropriateness of the antibiotics selected by clinicians and the algorithm during the clinical validation was compared.ResultsAlgorithms were accurate during clinical validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.71–0.94) for all 11 tested antibiotics. The algorithms’ accuracy improved as the organism was identified (AUC 0.79–0.97). In external validation in a geographically‐distant cohort, the algorithms remained accurate even without additional training on this group (AUC 0.69–0.87). When the algorithms were trained on the antibiogram from the geographically‐distant hospital, the accuracy improved (AUC 0.70–0.93). When algorithms’ performances were tested against clinicians in a contemporary cohort for the empiric prescription of oral antibiotics, the drug agent suggested by the algorithms more frequently resulted in adequate empiric coverage.ConclusionsMachine learning algorithms trained on a large dataset are accurate in prediction of urine culture susceptibility vs resistance up to 3 days prior to urine AST availability. Clinical implementation of such an algorithm could improve both clinical care and antimicrobial stewardship.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metastatic risk in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a tool incorporating sex, size, and grade 透明细胞肾细胞癌的转移风险:一个结合性别、大小和分级的工具
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16624
Frederik F. Thomsen, Marcus Westerberg, Rasmus D. Petersson, Rasmine Bak, Julie Bak Lindholst, Hayder Al-Husseinawi, Emma Heeno, Nessn H. Azawi
To identify predictors of metastases, estimate the proportion of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases according to these predictors, and subsequently create a risk table showing the absolute difference in metastasis proportion for each 10 mm increase in tumour size.
为了确定转移的预测因子,根据这些预测因子估计转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)病例的比例,随后创建一个风险表,显示肿瘤大小每增加10mm,转移比例的绝对差异。
{"title":"Metastatic risk in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a tool incorporating sex, size, and grade","authors":"Frederik F. Thomsen, Marcus Westerberg, Rasmus D. Petersson, Rasmine Bak, Julie Bak Lindholst, Hayder Al-Husseinawi, Emma Heeno, Nessn H. Azawi","doi":"10.1111/bju.16624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16624","url":null,"abstract":"To identify predictors of metastases, estimate the proportion of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases according to these predictors, and subsequently create a risk table showing the absolute difference in metastasis proportion for each 10 mm increase in tumour size.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142857537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sharing surgical images on social media: a snapshot of practices and some reflections for improvement 在社交媒体上分享手术图像:实践快照与改进思考
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16625
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Ali Talyshinskii, Christian Arvei Moen, Ingunn Roth, Lazaros Tzelves, Christian Beisland, Bhaskar K Somani
Click on the article title to read more.
点击文章标题阅读更多内容。
{"title":"Sharing surgical images on social media: a snapshot of practices and some reflections for improvement","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Ali Talyshinskii, Christian Arvei Moen, Ingunn Roth, Lazaros Tzelves, Christian Beisland, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1111/bju.16625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16625","url":null,"abstract":"Click on the article title to read more.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142825539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of patient positioning during surgery on neuropathies after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial 机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后患者体位对神经病变的影响:一项随机对照试验
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16623
Nico Christian Grossmann, Fabian Joel Aschwanden, Julian Cornelius, Christian Malkmus, Leutrim Zahiti, Pascal Viktorin, Lea Fierley, Einar Wilder‐Smith, Philipp Baumeister, Agostino Mattei, Christian Daniel Fankhauser
ObjectiveTo investigate whether ankle braces or shoulder support used for fixation during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), where patients are commonly positioned in the head‐down Trendelenburg position, differ in their potential to cause peripheral nerve injury.Patients and MethodsA prospective, double‐blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer between May 2020 and September 2021 using the da Vinci® Si system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Patients were randomly assigned to either the shoulder or ankle brace fixation group and were positioned in a modified lithotomy position. Neurological examinations were performed pre‐ and postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of any peripheral neuropathy on the first postoperative day.ResultsA total of 98 patients were treated using the da Vinci Si system: 46 in the lithotomy lower fixation group and 52 in the lithotomy upper fixation group. Both groups mainly recorded neuropathies in the lower extremity, with a total incidence of 6.9% for lower neuropathies and 3.9% for upper neuropathies. All neuropathies were sensory, with one exception in the upper fixation group presenting a motor deficit. Over a median follow‐up of 12 months, no neuropathies persisted. Neuropathy on the first postoperative day was observed in 15% of patients in the upper fixation group and 6.5% in the lower fixation group (P = 0.2).ConclusionWe observed neuropathies in a clinically relevant proportion of men undergoing RARP. We were not able to demonstrate a significant difference regarding postoperative neuropathies between ankle braces or shoulder support during RARP.
目的探讨在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中,患者通常采用头朝下的Trendelenburg体位,踝关节支架或肩部支架用于固定是否会引起周围神经损伤。患者和方法:在2020年5月至2021年9月期间,使用达芬奇®Si系统(Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA)对接受前列腺癌RARP治疗的患者进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。患者被随机分配到肩关节或踝关节支架固定组,并采用改良的取石体位。术前和术后进行神经学检查。主要终点是术后第一天周围神经病变的发生率。结果采用达芬奇系统治疗98例患者,其中下部取石组46例,上部取石组52例。两组均以下肢神经病变为主,下肢神经病变总发生率为6.9%,上肢神经病变总发生率为3.9%。所有神经病变均为感觉神经病变,上固定组有一例例外,表现为运动障碍。中位随访期为12个月,无神经病变。上固定组术后第一天出现神经病变的占15%,下固定组术后第一天出现神经病变的占6.5% (P = 0.2)。结论:在接受RARP的男性患者中,我们观察到一定比例的患者存在神经性病变。在RARP期间,我们无法证明踝关节支架或肩部支撑在术后神经病变方面有显著差异。
{"title":"Impact of patient positioning during surgery on neuropathies after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Nico Christian Grossmann, Fabian Joel Aschwanden, Julian Cornelius, Christian Malkmus, Leutrim Zahiti, Pascal Viktorin, Lea Fierley, Einar Wilder‐Smith, Philipp Baumeister, Agostino Mattei, Christian Daniel Fankhauser","doi":"10.1111/bju.16623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16623","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo investigate whether ankle braces or shoulder support used for fixation during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), where patients are commonly positioned in the head‐down Trendelenburg position, differ in their potential to cause peripheral nerve injury.Patients and MethodsA prospective, double‐blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer between May 2020 and September 2021 using the da Vinci<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> Si system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Patients were randomly assigned to either the shoulder or ankle brace fixation group and were positioned in a modified lithotomy position. Neurological examinations were performed pre‐ and postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of any peripheral neuropathy on the first postoperative day.ResultsA total of 98 patients were treated using the da Vinci Si system: 46 in the lithotomy lower fixation group and 52 in the lithotomy upper fixation group. Both groups mainly recorded neuropathies in the lower extremity, with a total incidence of 6.9% for lower neuropathies and 3.9% for upper neuropathies. All neuropathies were sensory, with one exception in the upper fixation group presenting a motor deficit. Over a median follow‐up of 12 months, no neuropathies persisted. Neuropathy on the first postoperative day was observed in 15% of patients in the upper fixation group and 6.5% in the lower fixation group (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.2).ConclusionWe observed neuropathies in a clinically relevant proportion of men undergoing RARP. We were not able to demonstrate a significant difference regarding postoperative neuropathies between ankle braces or shoulder support during RARP.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142815502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of social media in education: how to maximise learning 社交媒体在教育中的作用:如何使学习最大化
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16621
Thomas Hughes, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"The role of social media in education: how to maximise learning","authors":"Thomas Hughes, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1111/bju.16621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16621","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142809733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival after trimodal therapy in octogenarians with organ‐confined urothelial bladder cancer 三联疗法治疗80多岁器官限制性尿路上皮性膀胱癌患者的生存率
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16622
Mattia Longoni, Francesco Di Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Fabian Falkenbach, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Zhe Tian, Jordan A. Goyal, Nicola Longo, Salvatore Micali, Markus Graefen, Gennaro Musi, Felix K. H. Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Marco Moschini, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I. Karakiewicz
ObjectivesIt is not known whether cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) differences distinguish radical cystectomy (RC) from trimodal therapy (TMT) in octogenarians harbouring organ‐confined (T2N0M0) urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder (UCUB).MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2021), CSM and other‐cause mortality (OCM) rates were computed in octogenarian patients with organ‐confined UCUB undergoing either TMT or RC. Smoothed cumulative incidence plots depicted 5‐year CSM and OCM rates according to RC vs TMT. Competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted, adjusting for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Nearest‐neighbour 1:1 propensity‐score matching (PSM) for age and gender was also applied. Sensitivity analyses were additionally performed, focusing on White patients.ResultsOf 2335 octogenarian patients with T2N0M0 UCUB, 1562 (66.3%) received TMT and 793 (33.7%) received RC. Of those, 2082 (88.4%) were White. TMT rates increased from 53.5% in 2004 to 82.2% in 2021 (P < 0.001). The 5‐year CSM rate was 50.1% for TMT vs 31.1% for RC. After multivariable CRR, TMT independently predicted 1.7‐fold higher CSM (P < 0.001). After additional PSM, TMT also independently predicted 1.7‐fold higher CSM (P < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses exclusively focusing on White patients, almost identical results were recorded.ConclusionRates of TMT have nearly doubled in octogenarian patients with organ‐confined UCUB in recent years; however, CSM rates after TMT are also nearly twice as high as those observed after RC. It is crucial to communicate these observations.
目前尚不清楚癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)差异是否能区分八十多岁患有器官限制性(T2N0M0)尿路上皮性膀胱癌(UCUB)的根治性膀胱切除术(RC)和三模式治疗(TMT)。方法在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2004-2021)中,计算80多岁接受TMT或RC的器官受限型UCUB患者的CSM和其他原因死亡率(OCM)。平滑的累积发病率图描述了根据RC和TMT的5年CSM和OCM发病率。拟合竞争风险回归(CRR)模型,调整年龄、性别和种族/民族。年龄和性别的最近邻1:1倾向得分匹配(PSM)也被应用。另外进行敏感性分析,重点是白人患者。结果2335例老年T2N0M0型UCUB患者中,1562例(66.3%)接受TMT治疗,793例(33.7%)接受RC治疗。其中,白人为2082人(88.4%)。TMT率从2004年的53.5%上升到2021年的82.2% (P <;0.001)。TMT的5年CSM率为50.1%,而RC为31.1%。多变量CRR后,TMT独立预测CSM高1.7倍(P <;0.001)。在额外的PSM后,TMT也独立预测CSM增加1.7倍(P <;0.001)。在专门针对白人患者的敏感性分析中,几乎记录了相同的结果。结论近年来,80多岁器官受限型UCUB患者TMT发生率几乎增加了一倍;然而,TMT后的CSM率也几乎是RC后的两倍。传达这些观察结果是至关重要的。
{"title":"Survival after trimodal therapy in octogenarians with organ‐confined urothelial bladder cancer","authors":"Mattia Longoni, Francesco Di Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Fabian Falkenbach, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Zhe Tian, Jordan A. Goyal, Nicola Longo, Salvatore Micali, Markus Graefen, Gennaro Musi, Felix K. H. Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Marco Moschini, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I. Karakiewicz","doi":"10.1111/bju.16622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16622","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesIt is not known whether cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) differences distinguish radical cystectomy (RC) from trimodal therapy (TMT) in octogenarians harbouring organ‐confined (T2N0M0) urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder (UCUB).MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2021), CSM and other‐cause mortality (OCM) rates were computed in octogenarian patients with organ‐confined UCUB undergoing either TMT or RC. Smoothed cumulative incidence plots depicted 5‐year CSM and OCM rates according to RC vs TMT. Competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted, adjusting for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Nearest‐neighbour 1:1 propensity‐score matching (PSM) for age and gender was also applied. Sensitivity analyses were additionally performed, focusing on White patients.ResultsOf 2335 octogenarian patients with T2N0M0 UCUB, 1562 (66.3%) received TMT and 793 (33.7%) received RC. Of those, 2082 (88.4%) were White. TMT rates increased from 53.5% in 2004 to 82.2% in 2021 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). The 5‐year CSM rate was 50.1% for TMT vs 31.1% for RC. After multivariable CRR, TMT independently predicted 1.7‐fold higher CSM (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). After additional PSM, TMT also independently predicted 1.7‐fold higher CSM (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). In sensitivity analyses exclusively focusing on White patients, almost identical results were recorded.ConclusionRates of TMT have nearly doubled in octogenarian patients with organ‐confined UCUB in recent years; however, CSM rates after TMT are also nearly twice as high as those observed after RC. It is crucial to communicate these observations.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142815503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJU International
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1