Marie Semmler, Maurice Heimer, Can Aydogdu, Benazir Enzinger, Isabel Brinkmann, Frederik Kolligs, Gerald B Schulz, Christian G Stief, Philipp M Kazmierczak, Jozefina Casuscelli, Lennert Eismann
{"title":"Deep early tumour shrinkage in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.","authors":"Marie Semmler, Maurice Heimer, Can Aydogdu, Benazir Enzinger, Isabel Brinkmann, Frederik Kolligs, Gerald B Schulz, Christian G Stief, Philipp M Kazmierczak, Jozefina Casuscelli, Lennert Eismann","doi":"10.1111/bju.70174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70174","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146164007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to ‘Complications of vasectomy: results from a prospective audit of 105 393 procedures’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bju.70154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70154","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146153386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To investigate the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Methods: A narrative review was carried out using PubMed and searching for English articles published from January 2015 to May 2025.
Results: After the screening process, 12 retrospective studies comparing outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with ICI-based regimens, with or without CN (either upfront or deferred) were deemed eligible. Of those, six indicated a survival benefit for patients undergoing CN in combination with ICIs with hazards ratios ranging from 0.19 to 0.63, a finding that remains consistent within the upfront CN subgroup. However, the included studies' retrospective nature, inherent selection, and immortal time biases limit definitive conclusions. Ongoing phase III randomised trials, NORDIC-SUN (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03977571) and Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-1931 (also known as PROBE; NCT04510597), are evaluating the role of deferred CN after initial ICI therapy, while the role of upfront CN in the ICI era will be likely elucidated by SEVURO-CN (NCT05753839) trial.
Conclusion: Our findings highlight reconsidering the importance of CN in the ICI era, potentially driven by the influence of tumour burden on anti-cancer immunity and the limited efficacy of ICIs against primary tumours. Future research, ideally through randomised trials involving patients suitable for safe surgery, should aim to clarify the optimal timing of CN in the context of ICI therapy.
目的:探讨细胞减原性肾切除术(CN)在免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗转移性肾癌(mRCC)中的作用。方法:使用PubMed进行叙述性回顾,检索2015年1月至2025年5月发表的英文文章。结果:在筛选过程之后,12项回顾性研究比较了接受基于ci的方案治疗的mRCC患者的结局,有或没有CN(前期或延期)被认为是合格的。其中,6项研究表明,接受CN联合ICIs的患者的生存获益,风险比从0.19到0.63不等,这一发现在前期CN亚组中保持一致。然而,纳入研究的回顾性、内在选择和不朽的时间偏差限制了明确的结论。正在进行的III期随机试验NORDIC-SUN (ClinicalTrials.gov标识号:NCT03977571)和Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-1931(也称为PROBE; NCT04510597)正在评估延迟CN在初始ICI治疗后的作用,而先期CN在ICI时代的作用可能会通过SEVURO-CN (NCT05753839)试验来阐明。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在ICI时代重新考虑CN的重要性,这可能是由肿瘤负荷对抗癌免疫的影响和ICI对原发性肿瘤的有限疗效所驱动的。未来的研究,理想情况下是通过随机试验纳入适合安全手术的患者,旨在明确在ICI治疗背景下CN的最佳时机。
{"title":"Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: back to the future?","authors":"Rocco Simone Flammia, Riccardo Campi, Eugenio Bologna, Riccardo Bertolo, Costantino Leonardo, Fabio Calabrò, Daniele Amparore, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.1111/bju.70168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was carried out using PubMed and searching for English articles published from January 2015 to May 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the screening process, 12 retrospective studies comparing outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with ICI-based regimens, with or without CN (either upfront or deferred) were deemed eligible. Of those, six indicated a survival benefit for patients undergoing CN in combination with ICIs with hazards ratios ranging from 0.19 to 0.63, a finding that remains consistent within the upfront CN subgroup. However, the included studies' retrospective nature, inherent selection, and immortal time biases limit definitive conclusions. Ongoing phase III randomised trials, NORDIC-SUN (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03977571) and Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-1931 (also known as PROBE; NCT04510597), are evaluating the role of deferred CN after initial ICI therapy, while the role of upfront CN in the ICI era will be likely elucidated by SEVURO-CN (NCT05753839) trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight reconsidering the importance of CN in the ICI era, potentially driven by the influence of tumour burden on anti-cancer immunity and the limited efficacy of ICIs against primary tumours. Future research, ideally through randomised trials involving patients suitable for safe surgery, should aim to clarify the optimal timing of CN in the context of ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146164004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Seung Wook Lee, Seung Hwan Lee, Jae Heon Kim, Joon Hwa Noh, Jun Ho Lee, U‐Syn Ha, Cheol Young Oh, Taek Won Kang, Gyeongseop Lee, Sangchul Lee, Deok Hyun Han, Jun Hyun Han, Sang Hoon Song, Hyun Jun Park, Byung Ha Chung, Gyeong Eun Min, In Gab Jeong, Kyung Hyun Moon, Won Tae Kim, Ji Youl Lee, Choung‐Soo Kim
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed‐dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride and tadalafil vs monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods This phase III trial enrolled 667 patients. After screening and washout, eligible patients were stratified by the baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and randomised (1:1:1) to receive FDC dutasteride 0.5 mg/tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.5/5 mg), dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tadalafil 5 mg for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in total IPSS from baseline to Week 48. Efficacy and safety were assessed at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Results In total, 619 patients were analysed for efficacy. The least squares (LS) mean (standard error [ se] ) change in total IPSS at 48 weeks from baseline was −9.49 (0.37) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.40 (0.37) for dutasteride 0.5 mg group (LS mean difference [LSMD] –5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] −6.13 to −4.50; P < 0.001), and −9.53 (0.36) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.24 (0.37) for tadalafil 5 mg group (LSMD –5.29, 95% CI −6.30 to −4.27; P < 0.001). The FDC 0.5/5 mg group demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in quality of life. Although the maximum urinary flow rate and post‐void residual volume improved in all groups, differences were not statistically significant. In the comparison between the FDC 0.5/5 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg groups, the LSMD (95% CI) of change from baseline to Week 48 in the international index of erectile function ‐ erectile function (IIEF ‐ EF) total score was 4.03 (2.35 to –5.71) ( P < 0.05). Among the 655 patients analysed for safety, treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 32.88% (FDC 0.5/5 mg) vs 21.20% (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and 26.48% (tadalafil 5 mg), with few serious adverse events observed. Conclusions The FDC 0.5/5 mg demonstrated superior efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile compared with dutasteride and tadalafil monotherapies in patients with BPH.
{"title":"Combined therapy with dutasteride and tadalafil vs dutasteride or tadalafil monotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomised phase III trial","authors":"Seung Wook Lee, Seung Hwan Lee, Jae Heon Kim, Joon Hwa Noh, Jun Ho Lee, U‐Syn Ha, Cheol Young Oh, Taek Won Kang, Gyeongseop Lee, Sangchul Lee, Deok Hyun Han, Jun Hyun Han, Sang Hoon Song, Hyun Jun Park, Byung Ha Chung, Gyeong Eun Min, In Gab Jeong, Kyung Hyun Moon, Won Tae Kim, Ji Youl Lee, Choung‐Soo Kim","doi":"10.1111/bju.70163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70163","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed‐dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride and tadalafil vs monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods This phase III trial enrolled 667 patients. After screening and washout, eligible patients were stratified by the baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and randomised (1:1:1) to receive FDC dutasteride 0.5 mg/tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.5/5 mg), dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tadalafil 5 mg for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in total IPSS from baseline to Week 48. Efficacy and safety were assessed at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Results In total, 619 patients were analysed for efficacy. The least squares (LS) mean (standard error [ <jats:sc>se]</jats:sc> ) change in total IPSS at 48 weeks from baseline was −9.49 (0.37) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.40 (0.37) for dutasteride 0.5 mg group (LS mean difference [LSMD] –5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] −6.13 to −4.50; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001), and −9.53 (0.36) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.24 (0.37) for tadalafil 5 mg group (LSMD –5.29, 95% CI −6.30 to −4.27; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001). The FDC 0.5/5 mg group demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in quality of life. Although the maximum urinary flow rate and post‐void residual volume improved in all groups, differences were not statistically significant. In the comparison between the FDC 0.5/5 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg groups, the LSMD (95% CI) of change from baseline to Week 48 in the international index of erectile function ‐ erectile function (IIEF ‐ EF) total score was 4.03 (2.35 to –5.71) ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.05). Among the 655 patients analysed for safety, treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 32.88% (FDC 0.5/5 mg) vs 21.20% (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and 26.48% (tadalafil 5 mg), with few serious adverse events observed. Conclusions The FDC 0.5/5 mg demonstrated superior efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile compared with dutasteride and tadalafil monotherapies in patients with BPH.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146153388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicolas A Soputro, Lin Wang, Karim Daher, Abdulrahman Al-Bayati, Mohamad Watfa, Salim K Younis, Mohammad El-Hussein, Ruben Olivares, Riccardo Autorino, Christopher J Weight, Jihad Kaouk, Jane K Nguyen, Nima Almassi
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) for identifying detrusor muscle presence during transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).
Patients and methods: A total of 36 specimens from 17 patients were prospectively collected. The resected surfaces were analysed intraoperatively using CFM to evaluate the presence of detrusor muscle. All CFM images were independently reviewed by two board-certified genitourinary pathologists and two urology trainees, who have completed the necessary CFM training. Interobserver agreement was assessed, and diagnostic concordance between the CFM interpretations, standard cystoscopic evaluation, and final haematoxylin and eosin analysis, were analysed.
Results: All specimen preparations and CFM scanning were completed within 5 min. Interobserver agreement between the two pathology reviewers was 91.7%. When compared with final histopathology, expert pathology readers achieved strong diagnostic performance using CFM, with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.5%, and negative PV(NPV) of 90%. By comparison, the urology trainees yielded a sensitivity of 61.9%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 66.7%, while standard cystoscopic assessment demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 50%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion: Confocal fluorescence microscopy represents a feasible and promising adjunct for real-time intraoperative assessment of TURBT specimen adequacy and resection quality. Although expert pathology readers demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, acceptable accuracy can also be achieved by urology trainees with necessary training and additional experience. Nevertheless, larger, multi-institutional studies remain required to validate these findings and to further define the safe implementation of CFM in contemporary diagnosis and surgical management of bladder cancer.
{"title":"Intraoperative evaluation of detrusor muscle during transurethral resection of bladder tumour using confocal fluorescent microscopy.","authors":"Nicolas A Soputro, Lin Wang, Karim Daher, Abdulrahman Al-Bayati, Mohamad Watfa, Salim K Younis, Mohammad El-Hussein, Ruben Olivares, Riccardo Autorino, Christopher J Weight, Jihad Kaouk, Jane K Nguyen, Nima Almassi","doi":"10.1111/bju.70165","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bju.70165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) for identifying detrusor muscle presence during transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 36 specimens from 17 patients were prospectively collected. The resected surfaces were analysed intraoperatively using CFM to evaluate the presence of detrusor muscle. All CFM images were independently reviewed by two board-certified genitourinary pathologists and two urology trainees, who have completed the necessary CFM training. Interobserver agreement was assessed, and diagnostic concordance between the CFM interpretations, standard cystoscopic evaluation, and final haematoxylin and eosin analysis, were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All specimen preparations and CFM scanning were completed within 5 min. Interobserver agreement between the two pathology reviewers was 91.7%. When compared with final histopathology, expert pathology readers achieved strong diagnostic performance using CFM, with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.5%, and negative PV(NPV) of 90%. By comparison, the urology trainees yielded a sensitivity of 61.9%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 66.7%, while standard cystoscopic assessment demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 50%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Confocal fluorescence microscopy represents a feasible and promising adjunct for real-time intraoperative assessment of TURBT specimen adequacy and resection quality. Although expert pathology readers demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, acceptable accuracy can also be achieved by urology trainees with necessary training and additional experience. Nevertheless, larger, multi-institutional studies remain required to validate these findings and to further define the safe implementation of CFM in contemporary diagnosis and surgical management of bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146163976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kevin G Keane, Richard Gauci, Roslyn J Francis, Andrew M Scott, Cynthia Hawks, Andrisha-Jade Inderjeeth, Ian D Davis, Jayne Lim, Andrew Redfern, Dickon Hayne
{"title":"SUBDUE-3: SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab-<sup>89</sup>zirconium injEction; a phase 0 biodistribution study protocol.","authors":"Kevin G Keane, Richard Gauci, Roslyn J Francis, Andrew M Scott, Cynthia Hawks, Andrisha-Jade Inderjeeth, Ian D Davis, Jayne Lim, Andrew Redfern, Dickon Hayne","doi":"10.1111/bju.70153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70153","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146164060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristijan Skok, Lukas Scheipner, Sebastian Mannweiler, Karl Kashofer, Ariane Aigelsreiter, Ivana Milosevic, Conrad Leitsmann, Herbert Augustin, Martina Rößmann-Tsybrovskyy, Sascha Ahyai, Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Johannes Mischinger
To assess the diagnostic accuracy, workflow feasibility, and downstream compatibility of fluorescence confocal microscopy (Histolog® Scanner [HS]; SamanTree Medical SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) compared with frozen section (FS) for intraoperative margin evaluation (IME) during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
评估荧光共聚焦显微镜(Histolog®Scanner [HS]; SamanTree Medical SA, Lausanne, Switzerland)与冷冻切片(FS)在保神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)术中边缘评估(IME)的诊断准确性、工作流程可行性和下游兼容性。
{"title":"Feasibility and workflow analysis of confocal microscopy in robot-assisted prostatectomy","authors":"Kristijan Skok, Lukas Scheipner, Sebastian Mannweiler, Karl Kashofer, Ariane Aigelsreiter, Ivana Milosevic, Conrad Leitsmann, Herbert Augustin, Martina Rößmann-Tsybrovskyy, Sascha Ahyai, Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Johannes Mischinger","doi":"10.1111/bju.70157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70157","url":null,"abstract":"To assess the diagnostic accuracy, workflow feasibility, and downstream compatibility of fluorescence confocal microscopy (Histolog® Scanner [HS]; SamanTree Medical SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) compared with frozen section (FS) for intraoperative margin evaluation (IME) during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"295 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146138371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment on 'Impact of perioperative nutrition on recovery after radical cystectomy: a randomised trial'.","authors":"Longtu Ma, Zeming Qiu, Zhilong Dong","doi":"10.1111/bju.70160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth Day, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Elizabeth Waine, Rebecca Martin, Adam W. Nelson, Alexandra J. Colquhoun, Helena Burden, Benjamin Ayres, Vishwanath Hanchanale, Jonathan Aning, James Douglas, Niyati Lobo
Objective To characterise contemporary practice patterns in female radical cystectomy (RC) across the UK and Ireland, focusing on preoperative counselling, operative strategies, and postoperative care. Subjects and Methods A 36‐item survey was distributed to consultant urologists performing RC, identified via the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) and Cancer Alliances. The questionnaire addressed surgeon demographics, preoperative assessment and counselling, operative decision‐making including organ‐ and nerve‐sparing techniques, and survivorship care. Responses were analysed descriptively; group comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum and Fisher's exact tests. Results A total of 64 surgeons responded (56.1% [64/114]), representing 41 cystectomy centres (70.7% [41/58]). Preoperative assessment of sexual activity (68.8%) and menopausal status (78.1%) was common, whereas sexual orientation (15.6%) and prolapse (26.6%) were rarely addressed. Female surgeons were significantly more likely to enquire about menopausal status ( P = 0.025). Counselling on sexual dysfunction (98.4%) and vaginal shortening (96.9%) was routine, but other complications, including prolapse (68.8%), menopause (82.8%), or fistula (6.3%), were inconsistently discussed. Organ‐sparing practice varied: 28.1% rarely or never performed organ preservation, citing oncological concerns. High‐volume centres were more likely to offer organ‐sparing RC ( P = 0.013). Over half reported inadequate access to female‐specific rehabilitation services, with most centres lacking formal pathways for vaginal complications. Conclusions Female RC practice across the UK and Ireland is heterogeneous, with clear gaps in preoperative counselling, uptake of organ‐sparing techniques, and survivorship care. There is an urgent need for standardised, evidence‐based pathways and consensus guidance to optimise outcomes for female patients.
{"title":"Contemporary practice patterns in female radical cystectomy: results of a UK and Ireland survey","authors":"Elizabeth Day, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Elizabeth Waine, Rebecca Martin, Adam W. Nelson, Alexandra J. Colquhoun, Helena Burden, Benjamin Ayres, Vishwanath Hanchanale, Jonathan Aning, James Douglas, Niyati Lobo","doi":"10.1111/bju.70159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70159","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To characterise contemporary practice patterns in female radical cystectomy (RC) across the UK and Ireland, focusing on preoperative counselling, operative strategies, and postoperative care. Subjects and Methods A 36‐item survey was distributed to consultant urologists performing RC, identified via the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) and Cancer Alliances. The questionnaire addressed surgeon demographics, preoperative assessment and counselling, operative decision‐making including organ‐ and nerve‐sparing techniques, and survivorship care. Responses were analysed descriptively; group comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum and Fisher's exact tests. Results A total of 64 surgeons responded (56.1% [64/114]), representing 41 cystectomy centres (70.7% [41/58]). Preoperative assessment of sexual activity (68.8%) and menopausal status (78.1%) was common, whereas sexual orientation (15.6%) and prolapse (26.6%) were rarely addressed. Female surgeons were significantly more likely to enquire about menopausal status ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.025). Counselling on sexual dysfunction (98.4%) and vaginal shortening (96.9%) was routine, but other complications, including prolapse (68.8%), menopause (82.8%), or fistula (6.3%), were inconsistently discussed. Organ‐sparing practice varied: 28.1% rarely or never performed organ preservation, citing oncological concerns. High‐volume centres were more likely to offer organ‐sparing RC ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.013). Over half reported inadequate access to female‐specific rehabilitation services, with most centres lacking formal pathways for vaginal complications. Conclusions Female RC practice across the UK and Ireland is heterogeneous, with clear gaps in preoperative counselling, uptake of organ‐sparing techniques, and survivorship care. There is an urgent need for standardised, evidence‐based pathways and consensus guidance to optimise outcomes for female patients.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146098414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}