首页 > 最新文献

BMJ Open Respiratory Research最新文献

英文 中文
Effect of smoking on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and potential mechanistic pathways: a multicountry cohort study. 吸烟对耐药结核病治疗结果的影响和潜在的机制途径:一项多国队列研究。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003777
Matthew L Romo, Allison LaHood, Helen R Stagg, Carole D Mitnick, Letizia Trevisi, Cathy Hewison, Shrivani Padayachee, Edwin Herrera Flores, Lawrence Oyewusi, Palwasha Y Khan, Helena Huerga, Mathieu Bastard, Michael L Rich, Girum Bayissa Tefera, Mahmud Rashitov, Ohanna Kirakosyan, Aga Krisnanda, Atyrkul Toktogonova, Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui, Camilo Gómez-Restrepo, Tina Kotrikadze, Molly F Franke

Background: People who smoke are at increased risk of unfavourable tuberculosis treatment outcomes compared with those who do not, but the pathways that explain this disparity are unclear.

Objective: To estimate the difference in a successful end-of-treatment outcome by smoking status among people with multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) and to examine if this difference changes if people who smoked had the same retention in treatment as those who did not smoke.

Design and methods: Using data from the prospective endTB Observational Study, we estimated the difference in treatment success by cigarette smoking status, adjusting for baseline confounders including demographics, social history and comorbidities. To examine how this difference changed if everyone was retained in treatment, we censored participants who were lost to follow-up and applied inverse probability of censoring weights to simulate this scenario.

Results: Among 1786 participants in 12 countries, 539 (30.2%) reported smoking at least one cigarette daily. People who smoked were more frequently found in post-Soviet countries and had a complex social history (eg, incarceration and substance use) and infectious comorbidities (eg, hepatitis C). At the end of treatment, 73.5% of people who smoked and 80.3% of people who did not smoke had treatment success (risk difference in percentage points: -6.8, 95% CI -11.1 to -2.6). After adjusting for baseline confounders, the risk difference was similar (-5.2 percentage points), but the 95% CI was less precise (-14.1 to 3.2). When simulating a scenario in which everyone was retained in treatment, the risk difference was attenuated (-1.9 percentage points; 95% CI -11.1 to 4.7).

Conclusion: People who smoked had a lower frequency of MDR/RR-TB treatment success than those who did not smoke. Eliminating loss to follow-up reduced this difference by smoking status, suggesting that pathways related to retention in treatment were a major driver of this disparity.

背景:与不吸烟的人相比,吸烟的人结核病治疗结果不利的风险增加,但解释这种差异的途径尚不清楚。目的:估计多药或利福平耐药结核病(MDR/RR-TB)患者吸烟状况对成功结束治疗结果的影响,并检查如果吸烟的人与不吸烟的人在治疗中保持相同的时间,这种差异是否会改变。设计和方法:使用前瞻性终末结核病观察性研究的数据,我们估计了吸烟状况在治疗成功方面的差异,并调整了基线混杂因素,包括人口统计学、社会历史和合并症。为了检验如果每个人都继续接受治疗,这种差异是如何变化的,我们审查了那些失去随访的参与者,并应用审查权的逆概率来模拟这种情况。结果:在12个国家的1786名参与者中,539名(30.2%)报告每天至少吸烟一支。吸烟的人在苏联解体后的国家更为常见,并且有复杂的社会历史(例如,监禁和药物使用)和传染性合并症(例如,丙型肝炎)。在治疗结束时,73.5%的吸烟者和80.3%的不吸烟者获得了治疗成功(风险百分点差异:-6.8,95% CI -11.1至-2.6)。在调整基线混杂因素后,风险差异相似(-5.2个百分点),但95% CI不太精确(-14.1至3.2)。当模拟每个人都接受治疗的情景时,风险差异减弱(-1.9个百分点;95% CI -11.1至4.7)。结论:吸烟人群的MDR/RR-TB治疗成功率低于不吸烟人群。排除随访损失后,吸烟状况降低了这一差异,表明与治疗保持相关的途径是造成这一差异的主要原因。
{"title":"Effect of smoking on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and potential mechanistic pathways: a multicountry cohort study.","authors":"Matthew L Romo, Allison LaHood, Helen R Stagg, Carole D Mitnick, Letizia Trevisi, Cathy Hewison, Shrivani Padayachee, Edwin Herrera Flores, Lawrence Oyewusi, Palwasha Y Khan, Helena Huerga, Mathieu Bastard, Michael L Rich, Girum Bayissa Tefera, Mahmud Rashitov, Ohanna Kirakosyan, Aga Krisnanda, Atyrkul Toktogonova, Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui, Camilo Gómez-Restrepo, Tina Kotrikadze, Molly F Franke","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003777","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who smoke are at increased risk of unfavourable tuberculosis treatment outcomes compared with those who do not, but the pathways that explain this disparity are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the difference in a successful end-of-treatment outcome by smoking status among people with multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) and to examine if this difference changes if people who smoked had the same retention in treatment as those who did not smoke.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Using data from the prospective endTB Observational Study, we estimated the difference in treatment success by cigarette smoking status, adjusting for baseline confounders including demographics, social history and comorbidities. To examine how this difference changed if everyone was retained in treatment, we censored participants who were lost to follow-up and applied inverse probability of censoring weights to simulate this scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1786 participants in 12 countries, 539 (30.2%) reported smoking at least one cigarette daily. People who smoked were more frequently found in post-Soviet countries and had a complex social history (eg, incarceration and substance use) and infectious comorbidities (eg, hepatitis C). At the end of treatment, 73.5% of people who smoked and 80.3% of people who did not smoke had treatment success (risk difference in percentage points: -6.8, 95% CI -11.1 to -2.6). After adjusting for baseline confounders, the risk difference was similar (-5.2 percentage points), but the 95% CI was less precise (-14.1 to 3.2). When simulating a scenario in which everyone was retained in treatment, the risk difference was attenuated (-1.9 percentage points; 95% CI -11.1 to 4.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People who smoked had a lower frequency of MDR/RR-TB treatment success than those who did not smoke. Eliminating loss to follow-up reduced this difference by smoking status, suggesting that pathways related to retention in treatment were a major driver of this disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742115/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design of the MIST study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial of pirfenidone solution for inhalation in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis. MIST研究的设计:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的2b期试验,吡非尼酮溶液用于进行性肺纤维化患者的吸入。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003059
Martin Kolb, Tamera J Corte, Jeremy Feldman, Steven D Nathan, Colin Reisner, Deepthi Nair, Felix Woodhead, Howard Lazarus, Craig Conoscenti

Introduction: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a debilitating progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Oral pirfenidone has been studied in non-IPF ILDs, but in smaller academic studies, it did not achieve a statistically significant change in the primary endpoint. Increased systemic exposure with oral administration may lead to substantial adverse events and limit its utility. Clinical data support inhaled pirfenidone for the treatment of PPF with improved tolerability compared with orally administered pirfenidone.

Methods and analysis: Approximately 300 patients with PPF will be randomised 2:1:2 to one of three treatment arms: AP01 100 mg two times per day, AP01 50 mg two times per day or placebo two times per day by oral inhalation using the investigational eFlow Nebuliser System (PARI Pharma GmbH, Germany). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in forced vital capacity at week 52. The main secondary endpoints are change in quality of life measurements from baseline to 52 weeks, time to disease progression and change in lung fibrosis scores based on high-resolution CT from baseline to 52 weeks.

Trial registration number: NCT06329401.

进行性肺纤维化(PPF)是间质性肺疾病(ILDs)患者肺纤维化的衰弱性进展,而不是特发性肺纤维化(IPF)。口服吡非尼酮已经在非ipf患者中进行了研究,但在较小的学术研究中,它在主要终点没有实现统计学上显著的改变。口服给药增加全身暴露可能导致大量不良事件并限制其效用。临床数据支持吸入吡非尼酮治疗PPF,与口服吡非尼酮相比,耐受性提高。方法和分析:大约300名PPF患者将以2:1:2的比例随机分配到三个治疗组中的一个:AP01 100mg每天2次,AP01 50mg每天2次,或安慰剂每天2次,使用试验性eFlow雾化器系统(PARI Pharma GmbH,德国)口服吸入。主要终点是第52周时强迫肺活量与基线相比的变化。主要的次要终点是从基线到52周的生活质量测量的变化,到疾病进展的时间以及基于高分辨率CT的肺纤维化评分从基线到52周的变化。试验注册号:NCT06329401。
{"title":"Design of the MIST study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial of pirfenidone solution for inhalation in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.","authors":"Martin Kolb, Tamera J Corte, Jeremy Feldman, Steven D Nathan, Colin Reisner, Deepthi Nair, Felix Woodhead, Howard Lazarus, Craig Conoscenti","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003059","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a debilitating progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Oral pirfenidone has been studied in non-IPF ILDs, but in smaller academic studies, it did not achieve a statistically significant change in the primary endpoint. Increased systemic exposure with oral administration may lead to substantial adverse events and limit its utility. Clinical data support inhaled pirfenidone for the treatment of PPF with improved tolerability compared with orally administered pirfenidone.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Approximately 300 patients with PPF will be randomised 2:1:2 to one of three treatment arms: AP01 100 mg two times per day, AP01 50 mg two times per day or placebo two times per day by oral inhalation using the investigational eFlow Nebuliser System (PARI Pharma GmbH, Germany). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in forced vital capacity at week 52. The main secondary endpoints are change in quality of life measurements from baseline to 52 weeks, time to disease progression and change in lung fibrosis scores based on high-resolution CT from baseline to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06329401.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742111/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the use and perceptions of cannabis and vaping post-cannabis legalisation in people with cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorder: survey results from a large Canadian adult cystic fibrosis clinic. 评估囊性纤维化和cftr相关疾病患者在大麻合法化后对大麻的使用和看法:来自加拿大一家大型成人囊性纤维化诊所的调查结果。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002715
Renee Dagenais, Emma Karlsen, Kathleen Lee, Bradley Stuart Quon

Background: This study characterised the use and perceptions of cannabis and vaping in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-related disorder followed by a large Canadian adult CF clinic. It also aimed to assess whether cannabis legalisation in Canada affected perceived benefits and harms, and whether media attention regarding e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) affected perceptions of vaping.

Methods: An electronic questionnaire was emailed to all clinic patients on 23 April 2021, and remained open until 28 October 2021.

Results: 110 individuals completed the questionnaire, of whom 43% identified as a current user of cannabis. As a result of legalisation, 14% of respondents reported change in their perceptions of cannabis, primarily related to decreased stigma and increased awareness of medical indications and potential side effects. Cannabis was reported as being used medically for 85% of current users, with stress, insomnia/lack of sleep, and anxiety being the most common symptoms treated; the majority reported it to be somewhat or very effective to manage symptoms. Overall, 33% of respondents had tried vaping, but only 7% considered themselves current vapers. For 45% of respondents, the 2019 EVALI epidemic was reported to have changed perceptions of potential short-term and long-term effects associated with vaping, with increased awareness of potential harms.

Conclusions: Cannabis use was common, with a reported increase since its legalisation in this population. EVALI media attention was reported to increase awareness for potential harms associated with vaping. CF healthcare providers are well positioned to provide education and support so patients can make informed decisions about cannabis use and vaping.

背景:本研究描述了囊性纤维化(CF)和CF跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)相关疾病患者对大麻和电子烟的使用和感知,随后在加拿大一家大型成人CF诊所进行了研究。该研究还旨在评估加拿大大麻合法化是否会影响人们对电子烟的看法,以及媒体对电子烟或电子烟产品使用相关肺损伤(EVALI)的关注是否会影响人们对电子烟的看法。方法:于2021年4月23日通过电子邮件向所有临床患者发送电子问卷,并一直开放到2021年10月28日。结果:110人完成了调查问卷,其中43%的人认为自己是目前的大麻使用者。由于大麻合法化,14%的答复者报告说,他们对大麻的看法发生了变化,这主要与减少耻辱和提高对医疗指征和潜在副作用的认识有关。据报告,85%的现有使用者医用大麻,压力、失眠/睡眠不足和焦虑是最常见的治疗症状;大多数人报告说,它对控制症状有些或非常有效。总体而言,33%的受访者尝试过电子烟,但只有7%的人认为自己现在是电子烟使用者。据报道,45%的受访者表示,2019年EVALI疫情改变了他们对电子烟潜在短期和长期影响的看法,提高了他们对潜在危害的认识。结论:大麻的使用是普遍的,据报道,自从大麻在这一人群中合法化以来,大麻的使用有所增加。据报道,EVALI媒体的关注提高了人们对电子烟潜在危害的认识。CF医疗保健提供者有能力提供教育和支持,以便患者能够就大麻使用和电子烟做出明智的决定。
{"title":"Evaluating the use and perceptions of cannabis and vaping post-cannabis legalisation in people with cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorder: survey results from a large Canadian adult cystic fibrosis clinic.","authors":"Renee Dagenais, Emma Karlsen, Kathleen Lee, Bradley Stuart Quon","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002715","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study characterised the use and perceptions of cannabis and vaping in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-related disorder followed by a large Canadian adult CF clinic. It also aimed to assess whether cannabis legalisation in Canada affected perceived benefits and harms, and whether media attention regarding e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) affected perceptions of vaping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic questionnaire was emailed to all clinic patients on 23 April 2021, and remained open until 28 October 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 individuals completed the questionnaire, of whom 43% identified as a current user of cannabis. As a result of legalisation, 14% of respondents reported change in their perceptions of cannabis, primarily related to decreased stigma and increased awareness of medical indications and potential side effects. Cannabis was reported as being used medically for 85% of current users, with stress, insomnia/lack of sleep, and anxiety being the most common symptoms treated; the majority reported it to be somewhat or very effective to manage symptoms. Overall, 33% of respondents had tried vaping, but only 7% considered themselves current vapers. For 45% of respondents, the 2019 EVALI epidemic was reported to have changed perceptions of potential short-term and long-term effects associated with vaping, with increased awareness of potential harms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis use was common, with a reported increase since its legalisation in this population. EVALI media attention was reported to increase awareness for potential harms associated with vaping. CF healthcare providers are well positioned to provide education and support so patients can make informed decisions about cannabis use and vaping.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digitally assessed home FEV1 to identify the cause of poorly controlled asthma: a protocol paper for a prospective replicate cohort study. 数字评估家庭FEV1以确定控制不良哮喘的原因:一项前瞻性重复队列研究的协议文件。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003696
Cara M Gill, Patrick J Kerr, Ciara Ottewill, Vincent Brennan, Helen Doherty, Orla Smith, Elaine MacHale, Breda Cushen, Dorothy Ryan, Garrett Greene, Richard W Costello

Introduction: A significant proportion of patients with asthma remain uncontrolled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators. Multiple reasons exist for this. Suboptimal inhaler adherence, inadequate inhaler technique and continuous exposure to allergens are often found to contribute to poor asthma control. Additionally, symptoms from some comorbid conditions, such as obesity, GORD and deconditioning, may be perceived as arising from asthma. The first priority should always be to confirm if asthma is the cause of the patients' current symptoms.

Methods & analysis: In this protocol paper, we describe the design of a prospective cohort replicate study. We will test the hypothesis that digitally acquired data on lung function and medication use can better establish that asthma is the cause of symptoms, rather than guideline-recommended practice. Patients with clinician-diagnosed asthma who remain uncontrolled despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment will be enrolled. Over 26 weeks and five visits, lung function, markers of T2 inflammation and symptoms will be repeatedly assessed. The 'ground truth' diagnosis for each patient will be established using a multimodal template comprised of lung function, T2 inflammation data, response to treatment, assessment of alternative diagnoses and patient outcome over time.The primary aim of this study is to compare guideline-recommended methods to diagnose asthma with a novel metric derived from digitally measured lung function in combination with T2 inflammation, which has been developed in an independent cohort of patients with severe asthma and a healthy control group. In secondary analysis, we will assess the direct costs and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Ethics & dissemination: The trial was approved by the Beaumont Hospital's Research & Ethics Committee, REC number 21/89. Participants completed an informed, written consent form. Data will be analysed, anonymised and reported in relevant peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. Data will be anonymised prior to publication.

Trial registration number: NCT05357274.

导读:尽管使用吸入皮质类固醇和支气管扩张剂治疗,很大比例的哮喘患者仍然无法控制。这其中有多种原因。不理想的吸入器依从性、不适当的吸入器技术和持续暴露于过敏原通常是导致哮喘控制不良的原因。此外,一些合并症的症状,如肥胖、GORD和身体机能减退,可能被认为是由哮喘引起的。首先要确定哮喘是否是患者目前症状的原因。方法与分析:在这篇协议文件中,我们描述了一个前瞻性队列重复研究的设计。我们将检验这样一种假设,即数字化获取的肺功能和药物使用数据可以更好地确定哮喘是症状的原因,而不是指南推荐的做法。临床诊断的哮喘患者,尽管吸入皮质类固醇治疗仍不受控制,将被纳入。在26周和5次就诊期间,将反复评估肺功能、T2炎症标志物和症状。每位患者的“基本事实”诊断将使用由肺功能、T2炎症数据、治疗反应、替代诊断评估和患者长期预后组成的多模式模板建立。本研究的主要目的是比较指南推荐的诊断哮喘的方法与基于数字测量肺功能和T2炎症的新指标,该指标已在严重哮喘患者和健康对照组的独立队列中开发。在二次分析中,我们将评估这种方法的直接成本和成本效益。伦理与传播:该试验已获博蒙特医院研究与伦理委员会批准,REC号21/89。参与者填写了一份知情的书面同意书。数据将被分析、匿名化,并在相关的同行评议期刊以及国家和国际会议上报告。数据将在公布前匿名处理。试验注册号:NCT05357274。
{"title":"Digitally assessed home FEV<sub>1</sub> to identify the cause of poorly controlled asthma: a protocol paper for a prospective replicate cohort study.","authors":"Cara M Gill, Patrick J Kerr, Ciara Ottewill, Vincent Brennan, Helen Doherty, Orla Smith, Elaine MacHale, Breda Cushen, Dorothy Ryan, Garrett Greene, Richard W Costello","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003696","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with asthma remain uncontrolled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators. Multiple reasons exist for this. Suboptimal inhaler adherence, inadequate inhaler technique and continuous exposure to allergens are often found to contribute to poor asthma control. Additionally, symptoms from some comorbid conditions, such as obesity, GORD and deconditioning, may be perceived as arising from asthma. The first priority should always be to confirm if asthma is the cause of the patients' current symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods & analysis: </strong>In this protocol paper, we describe the design of a prospective cohort replicate study. We will test the hypothesis that digitally acquired data on lung function and medication use can better establish that asthma is the cause of symptoms, rather than guideline-recommended practice. Patients with clinician-diagnosed asthma who remain uncontrolled despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment will be enrolled. Over 26 weeks and five visits, lung function, markers of T2 inflammation and symptoms will be repeatedly assessed. The 'ground truth' diagnosis for each patient will be established using a multimodal template comprised of lung function, T2 inflammation data, response to treatment, assessment of alternative diagnoses and patient outcome over time.The primary aim of this study is to compare guideline-recommended methods to diagnose asthma with a novel metric derived from digitally measured lung function in combination with T2 inflammation, which has been developed in an independent cohort of patients with severe asthma and a healthy control group. In secondary analysis, we will assess the direct costs and cost-effectiveness of this approach.</p><p><strong>Ethics & dissemination: </strong>The trial was approved by the Beaumont Hospital's Research & Ethics Committee, REC number 21/89. Participants completed an informed, written consent form. Data will be analysed, anonymised and reported in relevant peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. Data will be anonymised prior to publication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05357274.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742105/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline characteristics from the EXCITING-ILD registry. EXCITING-ILD登记的基线特征。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002902
Katharina Buschulte, Hans-Joachim Kabitz, Lars Hagmeyer, Peter Hammerl, Albert Esselmann, Conrad Wiederhold, Dirk Skowasch, Christoph Stolpe, Marcus Joest, Stefan Veitshans, Marc Höffgen, Phillen Maqhuzu, Larissa Schwarzkopf, Andreas Hellmann, Michael Pfeifer, Juergen Behr, Rainer Karpavicius, Andreas Guenther, Markus Polke, Philipp Höger, Vivien Somogyi, Christoph Lederer, Philipp Markart, Michael Kreuter

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a group of more than 200 different subtypes. They vary widely in terms of incidence, prognosis and treatment, yet real-life data from Germany are sparse.

Methods: The prospective Exploring Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Interstitial Lung Diseases (EXCITING)-ILD registry included patients with all different ILD subtypes from different healthcare settings. Follow-up ranged from 36 months to 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively. Baseline characteristics, diagnostic and treatment information are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. The Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to quantify differences between groups. Line plots and bar plots were used for graphical presentation.

Results: A total of 601 patients (60.7% men, mean age 64.3 years) from 32 centres were included in the EXCITING-ILD registry. The most common subtypes were sarcoidosis with 26.6% (n=160) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with 25.3% (n=152). Pulmonary hypertension was present in 8.7% of patients (n=52), with high incidences in connective tissue disease-associated ILD (16.3%) and pneumoconiosis (27.3%). The mean forced vital capacity was 76.4% predicted, and the mean DLCO-SB (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide) was 54.1% predicted. The mean time to diagnosis was 38.8 months (SD 64.4) and was significantly shorter when the diagnosis was made after multidisciplinary discussion (31.6 vs 49.2 months, p<0.001). The frequency of surgical lung biopsies decreased over time in the registry, whereas the proportion of cryobiopsies showed a notable increase. In IPF, the number of patients treated with antifibrotics increased from 35.2% before 2015 to 48.4% in 2019.

Conclusion: The EXCITING-ILD registry describes the frequency of ILD subtypes, ILD-related impairments, selected comorbidities and diagnostic and treatment patterns in a representative German population.

背景:间质性肺疾病(ILDs)包括200多种不同的亚型。它们在发病率、预后和治疗方面差异很大,但来自德国的真实数据很少。方法:研究间质性肺病的临床和流行病学特征(EXCITING)-ILD登记包括来自不同医疗机构的所有不同ILD亚型的患者。随访时间为36个月至5年。对数据进行描述性分析。基线特征、诊断和治疗信息以绝对数字和百分比表示。采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验来量化组间差异。采用线形图和条形图进行图形表示。结果:来自32个中心的601例患者(60.7%为男性,平均年龄64.3岁)被纳入EXCITING-ILD登记。最常见的亚型是结节病,占26.6% (n=160),特发性肺纤维化(IPF)占25.3% (n=152)。8.7%的患者(n=52)存在肺动脉高压,结缔组织病相关ILD(16.3%)和尘肺病(27.3%)的发病率较高。平均强迫肺活量预测值为76.4%,平均一氧化碳弥散量预测值为54.1%。平均诊断时间为38.8个月(标准差64.4),多学科讨论后诊断时间明显缩短(31.6个月vs 49.2个月)。结论:EXCITING-ILD登记描述了具有代表性的德国人群中ILD亚型、ILD相关损伤、选择的合并症和诊断和治疗模式的频率。
{"title":"Baseline characteristics from the EXCITING-ILD registry.","authors":"Katharina Buschulte, Hans-Joachim Kabitz, Lars Hagmeyer, Peter Hammerl, Albert Esselmann, Conrad Wiederhold, Dirk Skowasch, Christoph Stolpe, Marcus Joest, Stefan Veitshans, Marc Höffgen, Phillen Maqhuzu, Larissa Schwarzkopf, Andreas Hellmann, Michael Pfeifer, Juergen Behr, Rainer Karpavicius, Andreas Guenther, Markus Polke, Philipp Höger, Vivien Somogyi, Christoph Lederer, Philipp Markart, Michael Kreuter","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002902","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002902","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a group of more than 200 different subtypes. They vary widely in terms of incidence, prognosis and treatment, yet real-life data from Germany are sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective Exploring Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Interstitial Lung Diseases (EXCITING)-ILD registry included patients with all different ILD subtypes from different healthcare settings. Follow-up ranged from 36 months to 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively. Baseline characteristics, diagnostic and treatment information are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. The Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to quantify differences between groups. Line plots and bar plots were used for graphical presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 601 patients (60.7% men, mean age 64.3 years) from 32 centres were included in the EXCITING-ILD registry. The most common subtypes were sarcoidosis with 26.6% (n=160) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with 25.3% (n=152). Pulmonary hypertension was present in 8.7% of patients (n=52), with high incidences in connective tissue disease-associated ILD (16.3%) and pneumoconiosis (27.3%). The mean forced vital capacity was 76.4% predicted, and the mean DLCO-SB (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide) was 54.1% predicted. The mean time to diagnosis was 38.8 months (SD 64.4) and was significantly shorter when the diagnosis was made after multidisciplinary discussion (31.6 vs 49.2 months, p<0.001). The frequency of surgical lung biopsies decreased over time in the registry, whereas the proportion of cryobiopsies showed a notable increase. In IPF, the number of patients treated with antifibrotics increased from 35.2% before 2015 to 48.4% in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EXCITING-ILD registry describes the frequency of ILD subtypes, ILD-related impairments, selected comorbidities and diagnostic and treatment patterns in a representative German population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a clinical prediction model for falls in individuals with COPD. 慢性阻塞性肺病患者跌倒的临床预测模型的建立。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002556
Khang Trong Nguyen, Dina Brooks, Luciana G Macedo, Cindy Ellerton, Roger S Goldstein, Jennifer Alison, Gail Dechman, Samantha Harrison, Anne E Holland, Annemarie Lee, Alda Marques, Lissa Spencer, Michael K Stickland, Elizabeth H Skinner, Kimberley Joy Haines, Marla K Beauchamp

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is linked to an increased risk of falls, however, there is no accurate method for predicting falls in this population. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for falls in individuals with COPD.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a recent fall prevention trial. Participants with COPD who reported a 12-month history of falls, concerns with balance or recent near falls were tracked for falls over 12 months prospectively. Baseline data included demographics and measures of balance, mobility and health status. A predictive model was developed using backward-selected multivariate logistic regression with fall status (no falls versus ≥1 fall) as the dependent variable and 17 baseline candidate predictors as independent variables. Using the bootstrap resampling method for internal validation, model performance was assessed for discrimination by the concordance (c) statistic and calibration by the expected to observed (E:O) ratio, calibration in the large (CITL) and calibration slope. The final model was adjusted for optimism using the bootstrap shrinkage factor.

Results: Of 178 participants (mean age 73±9 years; 83 females), 74 (42%) reported ≥1 fall over 12 months, totalling 188 falls. The predictive model identified three factors associated with 12-month future falls: reporting a 12-month history of ≥2 falls (OR=3.59, CI (1.65 to 7.82)), more chronic conditions (OR=1.14, CI (1.01 to 1.28)) and worse Timed Up and Go Dual-Task test scores (OR=1.04, CI (1.00 to 1.09)). The final prediction model achieved acceptable discrimination (c-statistic=0.69, CI (0.61 to 0.78)) and calibration (E:O ratio=1.01, CITL=-0.01 and calibration slope=0.93).

Conclusions: A history of ≥2 falls, having more chronic conditions and impaired mobility under cognitive demand predicts future falls in individuals with COPD. The prediction model showed acceptable internal validation. External validation is needed to confirm these findings.

Trial registration number: NCT02995681; clinicaltrials.gov.

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)与跌倒风险增加有关,然而,在这一人群中没有准确的预测跌倒的方法。本研究旨在开发并内部验证COPD患者跌倒的临床预测模型。方法:利用最近一项预防跌倒试验的数据进行二次分析。报告有12个月跌倒史、担心平衡或最近差点跌倒的COPD参与者在未来12个月内进行了跌倒追踪。基线数据包括人口统计和平衡、流动性和健康状况的测量。采用后向选择的多变量logistic回归建立预测模型,以跌倒状态(无跌倒vs≥1次跌倒)为因变量,17个基线候选预测因子为自变量。采用自举重采样方法进行内部验证,通过一致性(c)统计量评估模型性能的判别性,并通过期望观测值(E:O)比、大校准(CITL)和校准斜率来校准模型性能。最后的模型使用自举收缩因子进行乐观调整。结果:178名参与者(平均年龄73±9岁,女性83名),74名(42%)报告在12个月内跌倒≥1次,共计188次跌倒。预测模型确定了与未来12个月跌倒相关的三个因素:报告12个月≥2次跌倒史(OR=3.59, CI(1.65至7.82)),更多的慢性疾病(OR=1.14, CI(1.01至1.28))和更差的Timed Up和Go双任务测试分数(OR=1.04, CI(1.00至1.09))。最终的预测模型获得了可接受的判别(c-statistic=0.69, CI(0.61 ~ 0.78))和校准(E:O比值=1.01,CITL=-0.01,校准斜率=0.93)。结论:跌倒史≥2次、有更多慢性疾病和认知需求下的活动能力受损预示着COPD患者未来的跌倒。预测模型具有良好的内部验证。需要外部验证来证实这些发现。试验注册号:NCT02995681;clinicaltrials.gov。
{"title":"Development of a clinical prediction model for falls in individuals with COPD.","authors":"Khang Trong Nguyen, Dina Brooks, Luciana G Macedo, Cindy Ellerton, Roger S Goldstein, Jennifer Alison, Gail Dechman, Samantha Harrison, Anne E Holland, Annemarie Lee, Alda Marques, Lissa Spencer, Michael K Stickland, Elizabeth H Skinner, Kimberley Joy Haines, Marla K Beauchamp","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002556","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is linked to an increased risk of falls, however, there is no accurate method for predicting falls in this population. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for falls in individuals with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a recent fall prevention trial. Participants with COPD who reported a 12-month history of falls, concerns with balance or recent near falls were tracked for falls over 12 months prospectively. Baseline data included demographics and measures of balance, mobility and health status. A predictive model was developed using backward-selected multivariate logistic regression with fall status (no falls versus ≥1 fall) as the dependent variable and 17 baseline candidate predictors as independent variables. Using the bootstrap resampling method for internal validation, model performance was assessed for discrimination by the concordance (c) statistic and calibration by the expected to observed (E:O) ratio, calibration in the large (CITL) and calibration slope. The final model was adjusted for optimism using the bootstrap shrinkage factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 178 participants (mean age 73±9 years; 83 females), 74 (42%) reported ≥1 fall over 12 months, totalling 188 falls. The predictive model identified three factors associated with 12-month future falls: reporting a 12-month history of ≥2 falls (OR=3.59, CI (1.65 to 7.82)), more chronic conditions (OR=1.14, CI (1.01 to 1.28)) and worse Timed Up and Go Dual-Task test scores (OR=1.04, CI (1.00 to 1.09)). The final prediction model achieved acceptable discrimination (c-statistic=0.69, CI (0.61 to 0.78)) and calibration (E:O ratio=1.01, CITL=-0.01 and calibration slope=0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A history of ≥2 falls, having more chronic conditions and impaired mobility under cognitive demand predicts future falls in individuals with COPD. The prediction model showed acceptable internal validation. External validation is needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02995681; clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection in cystic fibrosis before and after initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor: now is not the time to lower the guard. 非结核分枝杆菌感染的囊性纤维化前后开始elexaftor /tezacaftor/ivacaftor:现在不是时候降低警惕。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003204
Ieuan Edward Shepherd Evans, Daniel Smith, Daniel Henderson, Timothy Riddles, Philip Masel, Vanessa Moore, Andrew J Burke, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid

Background: The prevalence of infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has been increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over the past 30 years. Emerging reports of beneficial effects of CFTR modulators, particularly elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), on the rates of NTM acquisition and persistence are encouraging. In this observational study, we evaluate the impact of the introduction of ETI on the prevalence of NTM infection within a cohort of pwCF living in sub-tropical Queensland, Australia.

Methods: We examined the impact of ETI introduction on rates of NTM isolation in pwCF attending an adult CF centre and two large regional clinics providing CF care. Data on NTM infection were collected for a minimum of 2 years pre- and post-initiation of ETI.

Results: In total, 271 (84.2%) were commenced on ETI with 33 (12.2%) of these pwCF isolating an NTM species on one or more occasion. The number of pwCF isolating Mycobacterium abscessus (Mabs) remained static across the 4-year period of analysis. However, there was a trend towards declining numbers of pwCF isolating either Mycobacterium intracellulare or other NTM species across the surveillance period.

Conclusions: ETI therapy was not associated with reduced rates of NTM isolation from sputum over the first 2 years of treatment. However, at a species level, two distinct patterns of change were seen with a trend towards a reduction in the isolation of M. intracellulare, while the rates of Mabs isolation remained unchanged. The reasons for this remain unclear at present but highlight the need for ongoing vigilance with screening for NTM in the setting of ETI therapy.

背景:在过去的30年里,囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者中非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)感染的患病率一直在增加。关于CFTR调节剂,特别是萃取剂/萃取剂/萃取剂(ETI)对NTM获取率和持久性的有益影响的新报告令人鼓舞。在这项观察性研究中,我们评估了在澳大利亚昆士兰州亚热带地区的pwCF队列中引入ETI对NTM感染流行率的影响。方法:我们研究了ETI引入对在一家成人CF中心和两家提供CF治疗的大型地区诊所就诊的pwCF患者NTM分离率的影响。在ETI开始前后至少收集2年的NTM感染数据。结果:共有271例(84.2%)进行了ETI检测,其中33例(12.2%)在一次或多次检测中分离出NTM物种。在4年的分析期间,分离脓肿分枝杆菌(Mabs)的pwCF数量保持不变。然而,在整个监测期间,分离胞内分枝杆菌或其他NTM物种的pwCF数量呈下降趋势。结论:在治疗的前2年,ETI治疗与痰中NTM分离率的降低无关。然而,在物种水平上,有两种明显的变化模式,即胞内支原体的分离率呈下降趋势,而单克隆抗体的分离率保持不变。其原因目前尚不清楚,但强调需要在ETI治疗的背景下持续警惕NTM筛查。
{"title":"Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection in cystic fibrosis before and after initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor: now is not the time to lower the guard.","authors":"Ieuan Edward Shepherd Evans, Daniel Smith, Daniel Henderson, Timothy Riddles, Philip Masel, Vanessa Moore, Andrew J Burke, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003204","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has been increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over the past 30 years. Emerging reports of beneficial effects of <i>CFTR</i> modulators, particularly elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), on the rates of NTM acquisition and persistence are encouraging. In this observational study, we evaluate the impact of the introduction of ETI on the prevalence of NTM infection within a cohort of pwCF living in sub-tropical Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the impact of ETI introduction on rates of NTM isolation in pwCF attending an adult CF centre and two large regional clinics providing CF care. Data on NTM infection were collected for a minimum of 2 years pre- and post-initiation of ETI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 271 (84.2%) were commenced on ETI with 33 (12.2%) of these pwCF isolating an NTM species on one or more occasion. The number of pwCF isolating <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (Mabs) remained static across the 4-year period of analysis. However, there was a trend towards declining numbers of pwCF isolating either <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i> or other NTM species across the surveillance period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ETI therapy was not associated with reduced rates of NTM isolation from sputum over the first 2 years of treatment. However, at a species level, two distinct patterns of change were seen with a trend towards a reduction in the isolation of <i>M. intracellulare</i>, while the rates of Mabs isolation remained unchanged. The reasons for this remain unclear at present but highlight the need for ongoing vigilance with screening for NTM in the setting of ETI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 and its impact on healthcare services provided to patients with COPD: a qualitative study. COVID-19及其对COPD患者医疗服务的影响:一项定性研究
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003196
Abdullah Aljahan, Rachel E Jordan, James Hodgkinson

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted primary healthcare for chronic disease patients, including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Information about whether virtual or remote consultations were effective or acceptable to patients with COPD is sparse. E-consultation and telephone triage strategies were deployed, with the vast majority of triaged consultations taking place over the phone or through video calls. This study explored the views of patients with COPD and providers on the effects of the pandemic on their health and healthcare, and barriers to/enablers of remote consultations.

Methods: 12 semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted via telephone/Zoom among patients with COPD and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the West Midlands, UK. Patients with COPD were recruited from the Birmingham Lung Improvement StudieS (BLISS) cohort. HCPs were approached via an advert distributed through general practitioner practices that were part of the BLISS cohort; brief adverts were disseminated to several professional organisations throughout the West Midlands area and social media. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six steps of thematic analysis.

Results: Three major themes around coping and life adjustment, NHS service accessibility and healthcare inequalities related to e-health literacy.

Conclusion: Post-pandemic priorities should include enhancing remote consultation training for providers, with a focus on rapport-building and care delivery. Equally important are providing flexible healthcare access, continuity of care and targeted support for vulnerable patients with COPD to maintain essential services during crises.

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对慢性疾病患者(包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者)的初级卫生保健产生了重大影响。关于虚拟或远程会诊对慢性阻塞性肺病患者是否有效或可接受的信息很少。采用了电子咨询和电话分诊策略,其中绝大多数分诊是通过电话或视频通话进行的。本研究探讨了慢性阻塞性肺病患者和提供者对大流行对其健康和医疗保健的影响的看法,以及远程咨询的障碍/促成因素。方法:在英国西米德兰兹郡的慢性阻塞性肺病患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)中通过电话/Zoom进行了12次半结构化访谈和开放式问题。COPD患者从伯明翰肺改善研究(BLISS)队列中招募。通过在BLISS队列的全科医生诊所中分发的广告与hcp接触;简短的广告被传播到西米德兰兹地区的几个专业组织和社交媒体上。访谈分析采用Braun和Clarke的六步主题分析。结果:三个主要主题围绕应对和生活调整、NHS服务可及性和与电子卫生素养相关的卫生保健不平等。结论:大流行后的优先事项应包括加强对提供者的远程会诊培训,重点是建立关系和提供护理。同样重要的是,为易受伤害的慢性阻塞性肺病患者提供灵活的医疗服务、持续的护理和有针对性的支持,以在危机期间维持基本服务。
{"title":"COVID-19 and its impact on healthcare services provided to patients with COPD: a qualitative study.","authors":"Abdullah Aljahan, Rachel E Jordan, James Hodgkinson","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003196","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted primary healthcare for chronic disease patients, including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Information about whether virtual or remote consultations were effective or acceptable to patients with COPD is sparse. E-consultation and telephone triage strategies were deployed, with the vast majority of triaged consultations taking place over the phone or through video calls. This study explored the views of patients with COPD and providers on the effects of the pandemic on their health and healthcare, and barriers to/enablers of remote consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>12 semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted via telephone/Zoom among patients with COPD and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the West Midlands, UK. Patients with COPD were recruited from the Birmingham Lung Improvement StudieS (BLISS) cohort. HCPs were approached via an advert distributed through general practitioner practices that were part of the BLISS cohort; brief adverts were disseminated to several professional organisations throughout the West Midlands area and social media. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six steps of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes around coping and life adjustment, NHS service accessibility and healthcare inequalities related to e-health literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-pandemic priorities should include enhancing remote consultation training for providers, with a focus on rapport-building and care delivery. Equally important are providing flexible healthcare access, continuity of care and targeted support for vulnerable patients with COPD to maintain essential services during crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12742183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
British Thoracic Society Training Standards for Pleural Procedures. 英国胸科学会胸膜手术训练标准。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-21 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003548
Andrew E Stanton, Avinash Aujayeb, Eihab O Bedawi, Alice Davies, Beenish Iqbal, Kirsty Laing, Dana Li, Izhaq Masih, David McCracken, Laura McNaughton, Kate Parrott, Maria Parsonage, Gerrard Phillips, Ben Probyn, Matthew Tate, Alanna Hare

The British Thoracic Society responded to a call from the pleural community to establish a new Training Standard for pleural procedures, relevant to all health care professionals. This should be seen as an enhancement to aspects of existing curricula and be supportive in giving clarity to learners and trainers about expectations for training and practice in pleural procedures.

英国胸科学会回应了来自胸膜界的呼吁,建立了一个新的胸膜手术培训标准,与所有卫生保健专业人员相关。这应被视为对现有课程各方面的加强,并有助于使学习者和培训人员清楚了解对胸膜手术的培训和实践的期望。
{"title":"British Thoracic Society Training Standards for Pleural Procedures.","authors":"Andrew E Stanton, Avinash Aujayeb, Eihab O Bedawi, Alice Davies, Beenish Iqbal, Kirsty Laing, Dana Li, Izhaq Masih, David McCracken, Laura McNaughton, Kate Parrott, Maria Parsonage, Gerrard Phillips, Ben Probyn, Matthew Tate, Alanna Hare","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003548","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The British Thoracic Society responded to a call from the pleural community to establish a new Training Standard for pleural procedures, relevant to all health care professionals. This should be seen as an enhancement to aspects of existing curricula and be supportive in giving clarity to learners and trainers about expectations for training and practice in pleural procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12730779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145817641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and COPD: a multicentre prospective study. 非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)与COPD:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-21 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003691
Eva Tabernero, Amaia Aramburu, Raquel Sanchez, Borja Santos, Nerea Ortiz, Ines Lopez de Calle, Larraitz Garcia, Elena Urra, Patricia Sobradillo

Introduction: An increase in airway isolates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has been observed, particularly in patients with previous lung damage. Inhaled corticosteroids may increase the risk of NTM lung disease. NTM isolation is of therapeutic importance, especially when macrolides are used. There are few data on the actual prevalence of NTM isolation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Objective: To determine the prevalence of NTM isolation and NTM pulmonary disease according to the ATS/ERS/IDSA 2020 criteria in patients with high-risk COPD. As a secondary objective, we sought to identify risk factors for NTM isolation and developing NTM pulmonary disease in patients with COPD.

Methods: Prospective multicentre observational study based on the collection of three sputum samples in a year, for standard, mycobacteria and fungi cultures, in patients with high-risk COPD (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s<50% and/or ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year), with a 12-month follow-up. Patients with at least two good-quality samples were included.

Results: 305 patients were initially selected, of which only 258 had at least two valid samples. NTM was isolated in 15% of patients (n=39), though only 8 (3%) met the ATS 2020 criteria for NTM disease. The most commonly isolated species was mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for NTM isolation: low body weight, alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, inhaled corticosteroids and cancer. NTM disease was only associated with body mass index <21.

Conclusions: NTM isolation is more common than expected in patients with COPD and may have implications for treatment. It is associated with low body weight, AAT deficiency, inhaled corticosteroid use and cancer.

导读:已观察到非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)气道分离株的增加,特别是在既往肺损伤的患者中。吸入皮质类固醇可能增加NTM肺病的风险。NTM的分离具有重要的治疗意义,特别是当使用大环内酯类药物时。关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者NTM分离的实际流行率的数据很少。目的:根据ATS/ERS/IDSA 2020标准确定高危COPD患者NTM隔离和NTM肺病的流行情况。作为次要目标,我们试图确定NTM分离和COPD患者发生NTM肺病的危险因素。方法:前瞻性多中心观察性研究,基于一年内收集三份痰样本,用于标准、分枝杆菌和真菌培养,高风险COPD患者(支气管扩张剂后用力呼气量为1 s)。结果:最初选择305例患者,其中只有258例患者至少有两个有效样本。15%的患者(n=39)分离出NTM,但只有8例(3%)符合ATS 2020 NTM疾病的标准。最常见的分离种是鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)。多因素分析确定了NTM分离的以下危险因素:低体重、α -1抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)缺乏、吸入皮质类固醇和癌症。结论:NTM分离在COPD患者中比预期的更常见,可能对治疗有影响。它与低体重、AAT缺乏、吸入性皮质类固醇使用和癌症有关。
{"title":"Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and COPD: a multicentre prospective study.","authors":"Eva Tabernero, Amaia Aramburu, Raquel Sanchez, Borja Santos, Nerea Ortiz, Ines Lopez de Calle, Larraitz Garcia, Elena Urra, Patricia Sobradillo","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003691","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An increase in airway isolates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has been observed, particularly in patients with previous lung damage. Inhaled corticosteroids may increase the risk of NTM lung disease. NTM isolation is of therapeutic importance, especially when macrolides are used. There are few data on the actual prevalence of NTM isolation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of NTM isolation and NTM pulmonary disease according to the ATS/ERS/IDSA 2020 criteria in patients with high-risk COPD. As a secondary objective, we sought to identify risk factors for NTM isolation and developing NTM pulmonary disease in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicentre observational study based on the collection of three sputum samples in a year, for standard, mycobacteria and fungi cultures, in patients with high-risk COPD (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s<50% and/or ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year), with a 12-month follow-up. Patients with at least two good-quality samples were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients were initially selected, of which only 258 had at least two valid samples. NTM was isolated in 15% of patients (n=39), though only 8 (3%) met the ATS 2020 criteria for NTM disease. The most commonly isolated species was mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for NTM isolation: low body weight, alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, inhaled corticosteroids and cancer. NTM disease was only associated with body mass index <21.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NTM isolation is more common than expected in patients with COPD and may have implications for treatment. It is associated with low body weight, AAT deficiency, inhaled corticosteroid use and cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12718591/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145817608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1