Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104608
Vicki Durston , Charlotte E. Coles , Adele Gautier , Andrea L. Smith , Alexandra Lewis , Georgia Attfield , Fatima Cardoso
The systematic collection and analysis of high-quality advanced breast cancer (ABC) data is necessary to advance understanding, optimize care, and improve patient outcomes. High-quality data enables understanding of treatment effectiveness, thereby facilitating the development of innovative therapies. ABC data may also help to counter stigma, by demonstrating that many living with the disease continue to contribute meaningfully to society. Data is an essential tool in highlighting global inequities and advocating to overcome them, and prevalence data is key to determining the burden of ABC worldwide, informing healthcare policies and investment in ABC care.
This manuscript reviews global efforts to improve the collection and analysis of ABC data over the past decade. It highlights the advances and persistent challenges to high-quality data collection and proposes actions for the decade ahead. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New methodologies yield more accurate estimates of the number of people with ABC; b) Data linkage initiatives reveal ABC prevalence far higher than earlier projections; c) ABC-focused registries have advanced data collection globally over the decade; d) High-quality ABC data has been shown to drive treatment access and policy change; e) Persistent gaps in recurrence data and registries remain.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
{"title":"Collecting high-quality data for advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 2)","authors":"Vicki Durston , Charlotte E. Coles , Adele Gautier , Andrea L. Smith , Alexandra Lewis , Georgia Attfield , Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104608","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104608","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The systematic collection and analysis of high-quality advanced breast cancer (ABC) data is necessary to advance understanding, optimize care, and improve patient outcomes. High-quality data enables understanding of treatment effectiveness, thereby facilitating the development of innovative therapies. ABC data may also help to counter stigma, by demonstrating that many living with the disease continue to contribute meaningfully to society. Data is an essential tool in highlighting global inequities and advocating to overcome them, and prevalence data is key to determining the burden of ABC worldwide, informing healthcare policies and investment in ABC care.</div><div>This manuscript reviews global efforts to improve the collection and analysis of ABC data over the past decade. It highlights the advances and persistent challenges to high-quality data collection and proposes actions for the decade ahead. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New methodologies yield more accurate estimates of the number of people with ABC; b) Data linkage initiatives reveal ABC prevalence far higher than earlier projections; c) ABC-focused registries have advanced data collection globally over the decade; d) High-quality ABC data has been shown to drive treatment access and policy change; e) Persistent gaps in recurrence data and registries remain.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104608"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104558
Leonor Matos , Mette van Ramshorst , Volkmar Müller , Elisa Agostinetto , Sabine Linn , Matteo Lambertini , Veronique Dieras , Fanny le Du , Sofia Braga , Carmen Criscitiello , Katarzyna J. Jerzak , Gil Morgan , Sara Brucker , Patricia von Kroge , Renate Haidinger , Gema Rodríguez Recio , Eva Schumacher-Wulf , Mario Fontes Sousa , Francesco Schettini , Elena Laakmann
Background
Routine brain imaging screening (BIS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) without neurological symptoms is currently not recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We aimed to examine physicians and patients’ attitudes and perceptions toward BIS.
Methods
International cross-sectional online survey for patients and physicians, distributed from May 2023 to February 2024. Patients with BC diagnosis were deemed eligible for patients' survey completion and BC-treating physicians were invited to fill the physicians’ questionnaire.
Results
A total of 529 physicians from 50 countries (80 % European) responded, mostly medical oncologists (70 %) working in academic hospitals (53 %). Most physicians request BIS (65 %), mainly when extracranial progression occurs, especially for HER2+ and triple negative BC (TNBC). Among physicians never performing BIS (35 %), 91 % would in case of proved clinical benefit. A total of 545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years, 86 % had metastatic BC, 51 % hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 30 % HER2-positive (HER2+) and 19 % TNBC. BM were diagnosed in 11.5 % patients with metastatic BC. 85 % patients would like to undergo BIS, especially younger ones (p = 0.02) and with HR-disease (p = 0.03), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. Notably, 91 % of patients would like to receive information regarding BM, while only 13 % of physicians routinely address the issue.
Conclusions
These results underline the willingness of patients to know more about the prospects of BM development, in contrast to the lack of routine discussion of this topic by physicians. Further investigation is warranted to demonstrate the clinical utility of routine BIS.
{"title":"Brain imaging screening in metastatic breast cancer: patients’ and physicians’ perspectives","authors":"Leonor Matos , Mette van Ramshorst , Volkmar Müller , Elisa Agostinetto , Sabine Linn , Matteo Lambertini , Veronique Dieras , Fanny le Du , Sofia Braga , Carmen Criscitiello , Katarzyna J. Jerzak , Gil Morgan , Sara Brucker , Patricia von Kroge , Renate Haidinger , Gema Rodríguez Recio , Eva Schumacher-Wulf , Mario Fontes Sousa , Francesco Schettini , Elena Laakmann","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104558","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104558","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Routine brain imaging screening (BIS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) without neurological symptoms is currently not recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We aimed to examine physicians and patients’ attitudes and perceptions toward BIS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>International cross-sectional online survey for patients and physicians, distributed from May 2023 to February 2024. Patients with BC diagnosis were deemed eligible for patients' survey completion and BC-treating physicians were invited to fill the physicians’ questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 529 physicians from 50 countries (80 % European) responded, mostly medical oncologists (70 %) working in academic hospitals (53 %). Most physicians request BIS (65 %), mainly when extracranial progression occurs, especially for HER2+ and triple negative BC (TNBC). Among physicians never performing BIS (35 %), 91 % would in case of proved clinical benefit. A total of 545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years, 86 % had metastatic BC, 51 % hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 30 % HER2-positive (HER2+) and 19 % TNBC. BM were diagnosed in 11.5 % patients with metastatic BC. 85 % patients would like to undergo BIS, especially younger ones (p = 0.02) and with HR-disease (p = 0.03), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. Notably, 91 % of patients would like to receive information regarding BM, while only 13 % of physicians routinely address the issue.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results underline the willingness of patients to know more about the prospects of BM development, in contrast to the lack of routine discussion of this topic by physicians. Further investigation is warranted to demonstrate the clinical utility of routine BIS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104558"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144942450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104582
Adam Ofri , Sze Ki Melanie Tam , Suki Gill , Andrew J. Spillane
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Current pattern of care in radiation therapy for DCIS in Australia - where are we heading?” [The Breast 82(2025) 104482]","authors":"Adam Ofri , Sze Ki Melanie Tam , Suki Gill , Andrew J. Spillane","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104582","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104582"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145181786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104663
Georgia C. Wright , Luke T. Glover , Thomas J.E. Hubbard
Introduction
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in early breast cancer treatment and responses are highly variable. Accurate monitoring of tumour response is crucial for enabling precise surgical de-escalation, yet current methods are inadequate.
This systematic scoping review explores emerging technologies for predicting, monitoring, and diagnosing pre-operative breast cancer response to NACT.
Methods
A search of Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was conducted until January 26, 2024. Studies investigating ability to detect tumour response during or after NACT, and prior to surgery, were included, and placed into 12 technology categories. Those investigating novel technologies were further categorised by Technology Readiness Level.
Results
From 2497 studies, 1329 met the inclusion criteria. 479/1329 (36 %) investigated conventional imaging; 19 % (253) investigated MRI, 5 % (64) mammography/ultrasound, 0.5 % (6) computed tomography, 0.4 % (5) digital breast tomosynthesis. Established technologies included gene panels (134/1329; 10 %) and post treatment core biopsy 35/1329; (3 %). 107/1329 (8 %) of studies developed nomograms based on routine clinical investigations, and 493/1329 (37 %) correlated established biomarkers e.g. Ki-67 with pathological response.
81 studies (6 %) addressed novel technologies, such as circulating nucleic acids (49/81), diffuse optical imaging (17/81), and elastography (15/81). A Technology Readiness Assessment revealed that all were between Technology Readiness Level 2 (Invention and Research) and 6 (Large Scale).
Conclusions
The majority of current research activity focuses on optimising existing technologies which may never provide the step change in diagnostic accuracy required to advance surgical de-escalation. Research activity should be focused on identifying effective novel technologies and driving translation into the clinical environment.
{"title":"Emerging technologies for monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic scoping review","authors":"Georgia C. Wright , Luke T. Glover , Thomas J.E. Hubbard","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104663","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104663","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in early breast cancer treatment and responses are highly variable. Accurate monitoring of tumour response is crucial for enabling precise surgical de-escalation, yet current methods are inadequate.</div><div>This systematic scoping review explores emerging technologies for predicting, monitoring, and diagnosing pre-operative breast cancer response to NACT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search of Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was conducted until January 26, 2024. Studies investigating ability to detect tumour response during or after NACT, and prior to surgery, were included, and placed into 12 technology categories. Those investigating novel technologies were further categorised by Technology Readiness Level.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2497 studies, 1329 met the inclusion criteria. 479/1329 (36 %) investigated conventional imaging; 19 % (253) investigated MRI, 5 % (64) mammography/ultrasound, 0.5 % (6) computed tomography, 0.4 % (5) digital breast tomosynthesis. Established technologies included gene panels (134/1329; 10 %) and post treatment core biopsy 35/1329; (3 %). 107/1329 (8 %) of studies developed nomograms based on routine clinical investigations, and 493/1329 (37 %) correlated established biomarkers e.g. Ki-67 with pathological response.</div><div>81 studies (6 %) addressed novel technologies, such as circulating nucleic acids (49/81), diffuse optical imaging (17/81), and elastography (15/81). A Technology Readiness Assessment revealed that all were between Technology Readiness Level 2 (Invention and Research) and 6 (Large Scale).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The majority of current research activity focuses on optimising existing technologies which may never provide the step change in diagnostic accuracy required to advance surgical de-escalation. Research activity should be focused on identifying effective novel technologies and driving translation into the clinical environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104663"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145681782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613
Sarah McHutchison , Tarishi Desai , Hayley Jones , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso
A diagnosis of advanced breast cancer (ABC) can be life-altering, presenting challenges that extend far beyond the clinical domain. Among these challenges is the ability to continue or return to work, a decision often influenced by financial necessity, social support, and the psychological desire for normalcy. Yet, systemic barriers such as treatment-related side effects, physical and cognitive impairments, and workplace stigma frequently hinders people with ABC from maintaining employment. The right to work is fundamental to dignity, independence, and quality of life, but for people with ABC this right is too often denied due to a lack of workplace support and insufficient legal protection.
This manuscript explores the current landscape and future opportunities to advance the legal rights of people with ABC. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) ABC diagnosis severely limits work participation and employment retention; b) Legal protections for ABC patients and informal caregivers (often unpaid family members and friends) remain inconsistent globally; c) Flexible work policies can reduce economic loss and support workplace inclusion; d) ABC informal caregiver burden causes significant economic and social impact.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
{"title":"Advancing the legal rights of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 10)","authors":"Sarah McHutchison , Tarishi Desai , Hayley Jones , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A diagnosis of advanced breast cancer (ABC) can be life-altering, presenting challenges that extend far beyond the clinical domain. Among these challenges is the ability to continue or return to work, a decision often influenced by financial necessity, social support, and the psychological desire for normalcy. Yet, systemic barriers such as treatment-related side effects, physical and cognitive impairments, and workplace stigma frequently hinders people with ABC from maintaining employment. The right to work is fundamental to dignity, independence, and quality of life, but for people with ABC this right is too often denied due to a lack of workplace support and insufficient legal protection.</div><div>This manuscript explores the current landscape and future opportunities to advance the legal rights of people with ABC. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) ABC diagnosis severely limits work participation and employment retention; b) Legal protections for ABC patients and informal caregivers (often unpaid family members and friends) remain inconsistent globally; c) Flexible work policies can reduce economic loss and support workplace inclusion; d) ABC informal caregiver burden causes significant economic and social impact.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104613"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145619943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606
Kadri Altundag
{"title":"Pathologic complete response in TNBC: A shield against recurrence, but not the brain?","authors":"Kadri Altundag","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104606"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145312443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611
Anna Cabanes , Jenny Gilchrist , Marzia Zambon , Maya Gilbert , Alexandra Lewis , Georgia Attfield , Fatima Cardoso
For people living with advanced breast cancer (ABC), the complexities of making treatment decisions, adhering to medication regimens, and balancing the social and personal aspects of the disease can be overwhelming. People with ABC need comprehensive information and resources to understand their disease, prognosis, and treatment options. However, this information is often difficult to access, interpret or navigate, leaving many feeling confused, frustrated and helpless.
This manuscript evaluates the global ABC information landscape and its evolution since 2015, it analyzes the ongoing challenges faced by people with ABC, and outlines recommendations for the ABC community over the next decade. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) The availability of ABC information has increased, but topics remain limited; b) ABC information from healthcare professionals is often limited to clinical topics; c) Patient advocacy groups are now crucial, trusted sources of ABC information; d) Online ABC information presents both opportunities and challenges; e) Global disparities in access to some topics of ABC information persist.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
{"title":"Meeting the informational needs of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 6)","authors":"Anna Cabanes , Jenny Gilchrist , Marzia Zambon , Maya Gilbert , Alexandra Lewis , Georgia Attfield , Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For people living with advanced breast cancer (ABC), the complexities of making treatment decisions, adhering to medication regimens, and balancing the social and personal aspects of the disease can be overwhelming. People with ABC need comprehensive information and resources to understand their disease, prognosis, and treatment options. However, this information is often difficult to access, interpret or navigate, leaving many feeling confused, frustrated and helpless<strong>.</strong></div><div>This manuscript evaluates the global ABC information landscape and its evolution since 2015, it analyzes the ongoing challenges faced by people with ABC, and outlines recommendations for the ABC community over the next decade. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) The availability of ABC information has increased, but topics remain limited; b) ABC information from healthcare professionals is often limited to clinical topics; c) Patient advocacy groups are now crucial, trusted sources of ABC information; d) Online ABC information presents both opportunities and challenges; e) Global disparities in access to some topics of ABC information persist.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104611"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609
Shani Paluch-Shimon , Laura Biganzoli , Julie Torode , Ginny Mason , Sung-Bae Kim , Runcie C.W. Chidebe , Merel van Klinken , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso
Despite remarkable advances in the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC), profound disparities persist in outcomes and access to quality care globally. A multidisciplinary approach, where specialists collaborate on diagnosis, treatment planning, care continuity, and timely referrals, is widely recognized as the gold standard in ABC management and has been shown to lead to more accurate diagnoses, individualized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes. Depending on the healthcare system, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) may include a medical oncologist, a radiation/clinical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, specialist nurse, allied healthcare professionals, and administrative staff. A multidisciplinary approach to ABC care is recommended by international guidelines and endorsed by leading bodies such as the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).
This manuscript explores the current multidisciplinary care landscape in ABC, highlighting progress made, persistent challenges, and future directions. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New EUSOMA quality indicators set benchmarks for multidisciplinary ABC care; b) Most national guidelines now recommend multidisciplinary care for ABC; c) Surveys reveal uneven multidisciplinary team access, notably in low-income settings; d) Telemedicine and virtual MDTs expand access to ABC expertise; e) Palliative care remains poorly integrated in many MDTs globally.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
{"title":"Ensuring access to multidisciplinary care in advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 4)","authors":"Shani Paluch-Shimon , Laura Biganzoli , Julie Torode , Ginny Mason , Sung-Bae Kim , Runcie C.W. Chidebe , Merel van Klinken , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite remarkable advances in the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC), profound disparities persist in outcomes and access to quality care globally. A multidisciplinary approach, where specialists collaborate on diagnosis, treatment planning, care continuity, and timely referrals, is widely recognized as the gold standard in ABC management and has been shown to lead to more accurate diagnoses, individualized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes. Depending on the healthcare system, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) may include a medical oncologist, a radiation/clinical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, specialist nurse, allied healthcare professionals, and administrative staff. A multidisciplinary approach to ABC care is recommended by international guidelines and endorsed by leading bodies such as the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).</div><div>This manuscript explores the current multidisciplinary care landscape in ABC, highlighting progress made, persistent challenges, and future directions. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New EUSOMA quality indicators set benchmarks for multidisciplinary ABC care; b) Most national guidelines now recommend multidisciplinary care for ABC; c) Surveys reveal uneven multidisciplinary team access, notably in low-income settings; d) Telemedicine and virtual MDTs expand access to ABC expertise; e) Palliative care remains poorly integrated in many MDTs globally.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104609"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668
Sinéad N. Duggan , Mohammad Azharuddin , Rodolfo Hernández , Clare Robertson , David Cooper , Emma McCall , Paul Manson , Gianni Virgili , Mike Clarke , Shaun Treweek , Miriam Brazzelli
Background
Underdiagnosis of breast cancer is a concern for women with dense breasts. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the performance and cost-effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities plus standard mammography, versus mammography alone, for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for English-language studies published January 2014 to November 2024. Eligible studies compared the performance of a supplementary imaging modality with standard mammography in terms of cancer detection rate (CDR) in women with dense breasts undergoing screening. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment was conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. PROSPERO: CRD42024550250.
Results
Out of 1740 search results, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Versus mammography alone, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified 18·92 (95 % CI 15·41-22·43) additional cancers per 1000 screenings while digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) detected 1·69 (95 % CI 0·81-2·58), 2·3 (95 % CI 1·28-3·33), and 2·57 (95 % CI 0·99-4·14) additional cancers, respectively. One study of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) reported a CDR comparable to MRI. Economic modelling studies revealed heterogeneous results, with MRI showing potential under specific model assumptions.
Concluding statement
Standard mammography often fails to detect cancers in women with dense breasts. Supplementary MRI provides better detection than DBT, ABUS, and HHUS. CEM seems comparable to MRI, based on limited evidence. These findings should be considered in future screening policy reviews for women with dense breasts.
背景:乳腺癌的诊断不足是致密乳房妇女的一个问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了辅助成像方式加标准乳房x光检查与单独乳房x光检查在致密乳房女性中检测乳腺癌的性能和成本效益。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Database、Web of Science和CENTRAL,检索2014年1月至2024年11月发表的英文研究。符合条件的研究比较了辅助成像方式与标准乳房x线摄影在接受筛查的致密乳房妇女的癌症检出率(CDR)方面的表现。使用QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C评估偏倚风险。筛选、数据提取和质量评估由一名审稿人进行,并由另一名审稿人进行检查。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42024550250。结果:在1740个检索结果中,有36个研究符合纳入标准。与单独的乳房x光检查相比,磁共振成像(MRI)每1000次筛查发现18.92例(95% CI 15.41 - 22.43)额外的癌症,而数字乳房断层合成(DBT)、自动乳房超声(ABUS)和手持式超声(HHUS)分别发现1.69例(95% CI 0.81 - 1.58)、2.3例(95% CI 1.28 - 3.33)和2.57例(95% CI 0.99 - 4.14)额外的癌症。一项对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)的研究报告了与MRI相当的CDR。经济模型研究揭示了异质的结果,MRI显示了特定模型假设下的潜力。结束语:标准的乳房x光检查通常不能检测出致密乳房的癌症。辅助MRI比DBT, ABUS和hus提供更好的检测。基于有限的证据,CEM似乎与MRI相当。这些发现应该在未来对致密性乳房妇女的筛查政策审查中加以考虑。
{"title":"Supplemental imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review with economic considerations","authors":"Sinéad N. Duggan , Mohammad Azharuddin , Rodolfo Hernández , Clare Robertson , David Cooper , Emma McCall , Paul Manson , Gianni Virgili , Mike Clarke , Shaun Treweek , Miriam Brazzelli","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Underdiagnosis of breast cancer is a concern for women with dense breasts. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the performance and cost-effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities plus standard mammography, versus mammography alone, for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for English-language studies published January 2014 to November 2024. Eligible studies compared the performance of a supplementary imaging modality with standard mammography in terms of cancer detection rate (CDR) in women with dense breasts undergoing screening. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment was conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. PROSPERO: CRD42024550250.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1740 search results, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Versus mammography alone, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified 18·92 (95 % CI 15·41-22·43) additional cancers per 1000 screenings while digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) detected 1·69 (95 % CI 0·81-2·58), 2·3 (95 % CI 1·28-3·33), and 2·57 (95 % CI 0·99-4·14) additional cancers, respectively. One study of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) reported a CDR comparable to MRI. Economic modelling studies revealed heterogeneous results, with MRI showing potential under specific model assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Concluding statement</h3><div>Standard mammography often fails to detect cancers in women with dense breasts. Supplementary MRI provides better detection than DBT, ABUS, and HHUS. CEM seems comparable to MRI, based on limited evidence. These findings should be considered in future screening policy reviews for women with dense breasts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104668"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}