BMC Gastroenterology最新文献

Background: Colonoscopy as a common screening practice to prevent colorectal cancer lacks strong evidence. NordICC, the first randomized trial of colonoscopy screening, reported no clear clinical benefit for colonoscopy in the intention-to-screen population with suggested benefit in the risk of colorectal incidence and cancer-specific mortality in the per-protocol analyses. However, although the study was designed to perform survival analysis, no survival outcomes were reported since the underlying assumption for hazard ratio was not valid. We aimed to assess whether colonoscopy screening is associated with improved survival outcomes compared with usual care.

Methods: We reconstructed patient-level data from the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the primary endpoints reported in NordICC for the intention-to-screen and adjusted per-protocol populations. The restricted-mean survival time difference (RMST-D) and restricted-mean time loss ratio (RMTL-R), which are robust alternatives to the hazard ratio without specific model assumptions, were calculated for colorectal cancer incidence and death.

Results: In this study, no significant difference in colorectal cancer incidence over 10 years was found in the intention-to-screen population (RMST-D: -0.68 days, 95% CI -3.9-2.6; RMTL-R: 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.22) or in the per-protocol analysis population (RMST-D: -2.9 days, 95% CI -6.5-0.67; RMTL-R: 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.35). In the intention-to-screen population, inviting individuals to colonoscopy did not improve colorectal-cancer death (RMST-D: -0.29 days, 95% CI -1.6-1.0; RMTL-R: 1.07, 95% CI 0.78-1.48). Over 10 years, in the per-protocol analysis, individuals who underwent colonoscopy survived an average of 1.1 more days free of colorectal cancer, but this difference was not statistically significant (RMST-D: 95% CI -0.13-2.3; RMTL-R: 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.07).

Conclusions: In this reanalysis of the NordICC data, no evidence of improvement in survival outcomes for participants invited to undergo colonoscopy compared to usual care was identified, even when assuming that all invited participants did undergo colonoscopy. Thus, our results do not support the use of colonoscopy as a population-wide screening test as a mean to decrease colorectal cancer incidence or death.

Registry: Not applicable.

Introduction: Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) are a devastating complication. Long-term impact of corrective hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for such injuries on post -surgery liver stiffness is lacking. Hence the aim of this study was to explore the extent of hepatic fibrosis in a cohort of patients with Strasberg E bile duct injuries who underwent HJ after a minimum follow-up of six months.

Methods: Out of 50 BDI presented over a period of 10-years, 19 patients with Strasberg type E, injuries that underwent HJ and completed a minimum 6-month follow-up [65.5 (7 -108)] period were selected. Data were prospectively collected on liver functions and liver stiffness was assessed using a Fibroscan. Their liver stiffness and degree of fibrosis was compared with (n = 38) age, gender and comorbidity matched controls.

Results: The median age was 47 (30-70) years, with 63% females. Primary HJ was performed in 84%, with a median time from injury to HJ of 7 (1-39) days. The total bilirubin was 16.5 (11.2) µmol/L, Alkaline Phosphatase was 102 (27.2) U/L, and Platelet count was 256 (77) x 10³. Liver stiffness (median 6.4 kPa) did not significantly differ from controls (5.3 kPa). Fibrosis assessment revealed comparable distribution of F0 to F3 fibrosis between the study and control groups (F0/F1: 68.4% vs. 84.4%, F2: 10.5% vs. 9.4%). However, all three patients with right hepatic artery injury (p = 0.003) and three of five patients with bile duct stricture had F3/F4 fibrosis.

Conclusions: Major BDI repair demonstrates comparable liver fibrosis in the absence of artery injury and anastomotic strictures. Measuring liver fibrosis could be valuable in the presence of arterial injuries or anastomotic strictures.

Background: Peritoneal drainage (PD) following laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) has long been considered beneficial for appendicitis patients, especially those with complicated appendicitis. However, recent research has raised doubts about the advantages of PD, as it not only fails to reduce postoperative complications but also prolongs the operative duration and hospital stay and incurs higher medical expenses. Given this controversy, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether drainage is necessary after LA for complicated appendicitis. This meta-analysis had registered in PROSPERO(ID: CRD42023472382).

Objective: This study assessed current evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential benefits of drainage versus no drainage following LA for complicated appendicitis.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Springer, and the Cochrane Library using the search terms "appendicitis", "laparoscopic appendectomy", and "drain" or "drainage" for studies published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2022. We employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria for study inclusion and exclusion. Primary outcomes included postoperative intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative intestinal obstruction, postoperative stump leakage, wound infection and postoperative visual analog scale(VAS) score, while secondary outcomes consisted of operative time, postoperative recovery time and total hospitalization duration. Studies with at least two outcomes were considered for meta-synthesis. Depending on I² values, fixed- or random effects models were used for data synthesis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for outcome comparisons between PD and no peritoneal drainage (NPD). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess and investigate inter-study heterogeneity.

Results: After conducting our literature search and screening, twelve studies were analyzed, comprising 3374 cases. During the comparison of primary outcomes between PD and NPD, the incidence of wound infection and postoperative VAS score were significantly higher in the PD group(P < 0.05). While during the comparison of secondary outcomes, the operative duration, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization duration were significantly longer in the PD group than in the NPD group(P < 0.05).

Conclusion: PD following LA for complicated appendicitis not only increases the incidence wound infection and aggravate patients' postoperative pain, but also prolongs the operative duration, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization duration. Therefore, routine PD after LA for acute complicated appendicitis is not recommended.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods: Conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the topic of immunonutrition and PD. Subsequently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, and finally conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: The analysis included a total of 10 RCTs with 574 patients, among whom 288 were in the immunonutrition group and 283 in the control group. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative infection-related complications (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.27-0.74; P = 0.002) and severe postoperative complications (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04) in the immunonutrition group compared to the control group. Additionally, patients in the immunonutrition group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD= -1.87; 95%CI -3.29 - -0.44; P = 0.01). However, the analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (P = 0.67). Furthermore, the incidence of specific complications and perioperative mortality rates also did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Perioperative immunonutrition in PD patients can reduce postoperative infection-related complications, but more high-quality RCTs are needed for further validation.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by relapsing inflammation of the colon. Tanshinone IIA, a compound derived from traditional Chinese medicine, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties and may enhance treatment outcomes when combined with mesalazine. This study aims to determine the overall response rate of Tanshinone IIA in combination with mesalazine for the treatment of UC.

Methods: We reviewed articles from the establishment of the databases until April 2023 in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM databases. They included a randomized controlled trial in which the intervention group was given tanshinone IIA plus mesalazine (T + M), while the comparative group was given only mesalazine (M). We removed duplicates or similar papers; papers with no available full text or incomplete data; animal research; and review and systematic review articles. STATA 15.1 was used to analyze the data.

Results: The perceived total effectiveness rate of T + M was found to be higher than M and the difference was found to be significant (P = 0.000). Additionally, pooled results show that TNF-α (P = 0.000) and CRP (P = 0.000) levels in the T + M group were all significantly lower than that in the M group. Furthermore, MHC-II expression in the T + M group was minors compared to that of the M group (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the T + M and M groups (P = 0.700).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that combining tanshinone IIA with mesalazine significantly enhances the overall treatment efficacy for ulcerative colitis compared to mesalazine alone. Tanshinone IIA also exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by reducing TNF-α, CRP levels, and MHC-II expression without notably increasing adverse events. Despite some limitations, these findings suggest that tanshinone IIA can be a promising adjunctive therapy for ulcerative colitis. Further large-scale, multi-center studies are needed to confirm these results and establish the long-term safety and effectiveness of this combination therapy.

Background: Decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is prone to recurrent episodes of decompensation following the initial event. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for subsequent decompensation and assess their impact on the outcomes of patients hospitalized for DC.

Methods: Patients with DC were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of new decompensated events during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for new decompensation. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between new decompensation and short-term mortality risk in these patients.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 339 patients with DC, with a median age of 57 years. During hospitalization, 83 patients (24.5%) experienced new decompensated events, with bacterial infections (BIs) being the most common (n = 46, 13.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.005) was the sole risk factor for new decompensation during hospitalization. Patients who experienced new decompensation had significantly higher 28-day (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (33.7% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) transplant-free mortality compared to those who did not. After adjusting for white cell count, C-reactive protein, and MELD score, new decompensation during hospitalization was identified as an independent risk factor for 28-day and 90-day mortality (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.42-4.87, P = 0.002 and HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.88, P = 0.033, respectively).

Conclusions: Patients with high MELD scores are susceptible to new decompensation during hospitalization, and the occurrence of new decompensation adversely affects short-term mortality in patients with DC.

Purpose: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is often accompanied by gastrointestinal motility disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and possible mechanism of transcutaneous gastric pacing (TGP) in early-stage AP patients.

Materials and methods: Sixty-five AP patients were randomly divided into conventional treatment group and TGP group. The serum ghrelin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) were used to assess the possible gastrointestinal hormonal mechanism involved. The parameters of electrogastrogram (EGG) were used to evaluate the gastric motility in AP patients. The first defecation time was used to assess the recovery of intestinal motility. The heart rate variability (HRV) test was performed to assess autonomic nervous function.

Results: Compared with the conventional treatment group, the TGP treatment significantly improved symptoms in early AP patients, and shortened the first defecation time (p < 0.05) and the hospital days (p < 0.05). The level of VIP (P < 0.05) was also decreased in TGP group. The percentage of normal gastric slow waves (GSWS) (p < 0.05) was increased. The interleukin (IL)-6 level was decreased (P < 0.05). Concurrently, the vagal activity (HF) was increased (p < 0.01), the sympathetic activity (LF) was decreased (p < 0.01), and the ratio of sympathetic vagal (LF/HF) was decreased (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The TGP treatment significantly improves the clinical symptoms in early AP patients. It also increases the percentage of normal GSWS. The therapeutic effect of TGP may be caused by autonomic nervous function mechanisms.

Background: Since 2015, an infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13, has been approved for commercial use in many countries, easing the economic burden borne by society and patients. Many clinical trials investigating CT-P13 for the treatment of IBD have been conducted and reported that it may be a substitute for infliximab. However, the differences between the efficacy of CT-P13 and infliximab-originator require further elucidation.

Methods: Data on the rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing of IBD were pooled for random-effects model meta-analysis using Stata MP 17. A total of 30 studies were included.

Results: The pooled risk of clinical remission rate of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis who were naïve to biologics at 08-14 weeks were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.58-0.75) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.43-0.54), respectively, and at 100-104 weeks were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.79) respectively. The pooled risk of clinical remission rate of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis who were transitioned from the original agent at 24-32 weeks were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.93), respectively, and at 48-54 weeks were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.86) respectively. The pooled rates for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46 to 0.67) at 08-14 weeks, and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42 to 0.85) at 48-54 weeks. RCT studies showed no significant change in efficacy after switching, whether Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.

Conclusions: CT-P13 is effective in short and long-term periods. The application of CT-P13 for the management of IBD was promising.

Objective: This research aimed to delineate the pharmacological mechanisms of 7-Hydroxycoumarin (7-HC) on ulcerative colitis (UC) employing network pharmacology and experimental validation.

Methods: To investigate the therapeutic effects of 7-HC on UC, a UC mouse model was established through the unrestricted intake of 3.0% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in their drinking water. Subsequently, we predicted the core targets and signaling pathways of 7-HC for the treatment of UC using the network pharmacology approach. Finally, the insights gained from network pharmacology were further validated by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation as well as in vivo experiments.

Results: Administering 7-HC orally to mice with UC led to a marked improvement in colitis indicators. Furthermore, 7-HC significantly lowered the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) in the colon and modulated oxidative stress markers (MPO, SOD). Subsequent studies identified 2 core targets (AKT1 and EGFR) in the colon of UC mice that were inhibited by 7-HC. Network pharmacology and experimental validation showed that 7-HC can reduce the expression of MAPK pathway markers P38, JNK, ERK, and their phosphorylation; 7-HC can also ameliorate UC by regulating the gut microbiome.

Conclusion: 7-HC demonstrates considerable efficacy in alleviating UC in mice, primarily through substantial diminution of tissue inflammation and oxidative stress. This is the first time that 7-HC has been found to treat UC by inhibiting the MAPK pathway and modulating the gut microbiota, providing a fresh perspective on the pharmacological mechanisms through which 7-HC operates in the management of UC.